web
counter
 

Dogtooth Review: It's Cool To Love Your Family

By TK | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (20)



dogtooth12.jpg

IMDB’s genre tags for Dogtooth are “Comedy” and “Drama.”

Believe me when I tell you with great certainty that it is neither of those things. It is one of the few truly mystifying, almost indescribable films that I’ve seen, and it will likely take a while to get its twisted, stilted puzzle out of my head.

Dogtooth, the Greek film directed by Giorgos Lanthimos, is about a family’s life in an isolated country estate. The Father (no one’s names are ever mentioned) works a dull job at a factory, the Mother stays home and watches their three teenaged/young adult children — two daughters and a son. In some sort of unexplained, morbidly fascinating experiment, the parents teach the children that they may never leave the confines of their walled-in grounds, under any circumstance, lest they perish from the evils and dangers that roam the outer world. They have no television reception (only a VCR to play home movies), no radio, or telephone. The world of the three children is the world that their parents have taught them. The children are all strangely childlike, yet lack a natural child’s curiosity — a trait that is strictly enforced by their parents.

It sounds like a twist on Shayamalan’s The Village, and that’s so very not accurate. Because the Parents are slowly creating monsters, in their own eerie, tragic fashion. The children spend their days doing chores ranging from vacuuming floors to grooming their parents. They communicate affection via hugs… and licking each other. They play games when they’re alone — games like “who can hold their fingers under scalding hot water for the longest” and “who will wake up first after we chloroform ourselves.”

And that’s only the beginning. The parents also teach the children random incorrect words — “sea” is a chair, and the salt shaker is “telephone.” It makes no sense, until you realize that the words that they’re substituting are all words representative of the outside world. The parents’ lives revolve around ensuring that the children never leave, telling them that they can only leave when they loose a “dogtooth,” or one of their canines, which will demonstrate that they are old enough. They claim that they had a sibling who left too early, and now desperately roams the wilderness outside alone, but never to return. In fact, their only contact with the outside world is the woman that Father drives to the house (blindfolded) and pays to have sex with the son.

It is a singularly unusual film, for so many reasons. Dogtooth is one of those films that I don’t even know if I can call “good.” It lacks many of the conventions of a normal film — the performances are universally wooden and monotone, with only hints of emotion from any of the characters. Even as Father administers an occasional savage beating to one of the children, expressions barely change — for either of them. The film is virtually without music, except for the piano or guitar playing of the Son. The camera work is absolutely riveting — it is, for almost the entire film, completely fixed. No tracking shots, no movement. It jumps from angle to angle, but any given shot is almost perfectly still. If someone walks out of its eye, then the camera simply continues to focus on the now-unoccupied space, as if you’re meant to watch the space itself, and not those that occupy it. It’s unsettling in many ways, ways that I find hard to describe.

Hell, the whole film is profoundly disconcerting, and that feeling is in and of itself peculiar, especially since for the majority of its duration, it feels like it lacks any sense of trajectory or purpose. It wanders almost aimlessly from vignette to vignette, with little sense of transition or connection. Instead, it plays like a series of random observations of this strangely awful, cult-like family. It’s only upon careful observation, and subtly over time, that one realizes that (unsurprisingly) each child is slowly manifesting signs of self-destruction, the product of the bizarre abuses doled out by the Parents, headed towards disaster.

It’s that inertia, interspersed with some shocking and disturbing scenes, that make the film such a jarring, visceral experience. You find yourself constantly wondering what the hell is going on (the parents’ motivations are only vaguely alluded to), and the lack of any sense of conventional narrative keeps the viewer consistently off-balance. But make no mistake — while Dogtooth is a deeply disturbing, intense, and twisted film — it’s not anything close to torture porn (though one scene with a cat will definitely put some people off). It doesn’t relish in violence or torture or suffering, and though the children are punished at times, it isn’t in any revolting, sick sense. And perhaps that’s what makes it all the more riveting to experience. It’s terrifying in a far more subtle, subversive way. Its horrifyingly dull sense of sexuality plays into that as well — the sex scenes, be they between Son and his de facto concubine, or between Father and Mother, are all sickly passionless and devoid of any sense of the erotic or affection. The film is replete with copious nudity and sex, some of it surprisingly explicit, but its total lack of titillation or sensuality make it all the more unnerving.

Dogtooth is one of the most creative, remarkable, and peculiar films I’ve ever seen, but the jury’s still out on whether or not that’s a good thing. I suppose that very sense of off-balanced anxiety that it creates makes it a success, but it’s not for everyone (though I must say — the ending is absolutely perfect). It’s risky, gripping film making unlike any other, but it also makes the viewer squeamish as hell and deeply unsettled. For those willing to endure it, it’s a fascinating, difficult, but ultimately thought-provoking experience.

Dogtooth is currently available on Netflix Instant Watch









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Wham-O Repped By ICM | A F*cking Hula Hoop Has An Agent Before I Do. And I Do All My Own Nude Scenes. | Rick, Buddy, We Miss You | Pajiba Love









Comments

This sounds like it's right up my alley. Great review,TK.

Posted by: Jadine at February 1, 2011 12:52 PM

The more I read about this film, the more confused I am. I know I want to see it and I guess that's good enough. An excellent review regardless.

Posted by: Robert at February 1, 2011 1:03 PM

I've had this film on my list since you guys posted the trailer, and, coincidentally, saw it last night on Netflix.

Every word in this review is dead-on. I just can't put my finger on exactly how to describe this movie, nor why it's so disturbing. It's not overtly anything, really. It's like drinking milk that you think might be a bit off, and instead of being able to enjoy the milk, you are constantly trying to detect the offness. It's all you can think of.

I kept thinking that it would delve into a kind of Flowers in the Attic type of situation, but it never does. Then I thought it was going to be more like a torture-porn situation, but that never went anywhere either. I came to realize that the parents are completely sold on this bizarre little world they created, and they legitimately love their offspring, fucked up as it seems. It's not some sort of experiment.

It's certainly not a comedy... it's weird that it would be tagged as such. Anyone who finds this film funny should have their head examined. Disturbingly absurd might be more descriptive.

I agree with TK in that I can't really say it's a good movie, but I can say that I would recommend watching it in much the same way as I would ask a friend to taste that spoiled milk, to see if they taste the same thing.

Posted by: logar at February 1, 2011 1:05 PM

I'm intrigued. Queuing.

Posted by: Paultera at February 1, 2011 1:19 PM

A cat gets killed for dramatic effect; I'm not watching it. Sorry, gotta stand up for my little furballs.

Posted by: the new transported man at February 1, 2011 1:24 PM

Ok, I added it to my queue but as I did so I noticed that the DVD cover has a NY Times quote on the front - "Hilarious". Someone thought this was a hoot and the studio thought it was a proper critique to use.

Posted by: Paultera at February 1, 2011 1:26 PM

Ditto Jadine.

I was so curious about this when I saw it pop up on Netflix Instant - unfortunately their reviewers aren't the most reliable source...

Posted by: mae at February 1, 2011 1:30 PM

I was waiting for this review - nicely done, TK. When I read about it, I got a feeling of something akin to Never Let Me Go. Looking forward to...feeling weird?

Posted by: Cindy at February 1, 2011 1:38 PM

the new transported man: You know that cat-killing scene is fake, right?

Posted by: logar at February 1, 2011 1:49 PM

Great movie/review.

Also is that a Feist reference in the headline?

Posted by: headmonkeys at February 1, 2011 1:53 PM

I really, really liked this film. I couldn't quite put a name to what I was feeling when I watched this but TK hit it on the head: disconcerted.

Posted by: JapJay at February 1, 2011 2:16 PM

As the daughter-in-law of Greeks, I can assure you that they do go to great lengths to make sure their children never really leave them.
That is all I can tell you about the accuracy of this film since I will never see it because of the aforementioned cat issues.

Posted by: PaddyDog at February 1, 2011 2:56 PM

I also thought of Never Let Me Go before watching it...isolated kids with no sense of the real world, etc. But the similarities end there. This movie is really, reeeeally weird.

Stupidly, I watched it with no knowledge of what it was about. I completely missed that the stranger was a prostitute. I thought she was an eldest sister and they were going for a Flowers-in-the-Attic thing.

Posted by: Skyler Durden at February 1, 2011 4:45 PM

Oh wow, logar had the same thought. So I wasn't alone when I went there.

Posted by: Skyler Durden at February 1, 2011 4:47 PM

Sounds like something to cheer for in the Oscars night.

Posted by: schmerpes at February 1, 2011 5:55 PM

If the presence of kitten murder is the only factor driving you away from this you should take the plunge and see it.

They cut right before he does it.

Though they do then have a shot of the ADORABLE little carcass afterwards. Even disemboweled kittens still bring the cute.

Posted by: aroorda at February 1, 2011 9:32 PM

Cat people who can't see a movie because of cat death are bad humans.

Go back to cat thread and stay there.

Garrgh.

Fuck cats.

Posted by: Peter G at February 2, 2011 12:06 AM

This review was fantastic and dead on. Dogtooth had me puzzled on how to feel and this review justified what I had already thought.
I could see this one gaining momentum over time just by word of mouth.

Posted by: kyle at February 5, 2011 4:16 PM

I found myself laughing uncontrollably at certain points but it certainly wasn't funny at all. I think it was just a physical reaction to the sheer discomfort of everything going on.

But I can say I was pretty damn impressed by it overall and the review is spot on. It was definitely a visceral experience if nothing else. And there were certain shots that blew me away- technically speaking it was all very well done. But I don't think it's movie I'll ever revisit again. Except for that guitar/dance scene. I want to learn that song and dance immediately. That actually was hilarious.

Oh and one more thing- This movie is the worst thing to happen to my poorly conceived notion of Greek people since My Big Fat Greek Wedding.

Posted by: THRILLHO at February 10, 2011 1:41 AM

Fuck Peter G! I am sick of seeing violence to animals in movies and Greece is the owrst country in Europe for lack of animal welfare. What a piece of shit movie.

Posted by: nick at February 28, 2011 9:09 AM