blogspot
visitor
District 9 Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

3262_7739543817.jpg
Us and Them


District 9 / Steven Lloyd Wilson

Film Reviews | March 6, 2010 | Comments (126)


Neill Blomkamp is a South African director who got his start as a 3D animator for a variety of sci-fi films and television series (including “Stargate SG-1,” “Dark Angel,” and “Smallville”). In 2005, he directed a short six minute film entitled Alive in Joburg, a faux documentary that explored the idea of extraterrestrial refugees exploited in South Africa. The film impressed Peter Jackson of Lord of the Rings fame enough that he backed Blomkamp with $30 million to adapt the themes of Alive in Joburg into the feature length District 9.

The resulting film is simply fantastic.

The film uses documentary footage to establish that 20 years prior to the film’s start, an alien spacecraft coasted down and halted above Johannesburg, South Africa. For months it hovered there, before teams were sent to cut into the hull. They find refugees, too sick and terrified to be of any threat or any help. They are shuttled down to Earth, a refugee camp is established called “District 9.” First contact is nothing like anticipated. The leadership of the aliens is apparently dead or absent. The survivors are ignorant laborers with no education or knowledge of the ship’s technology. What technology there is cannot be stripped and used by humans. It is partly biological in nature, only functioning in the hands of one of the aliens.

After 20 years, sentiment has turned against the million aliens, slurred as “prawns,” living in District 9. Many contend that the money spent supporting the aliens is a waste, better spent on human problems. The stagnant situation is not viable in the long run. At last, control of the camp is turned over to a private conglomerate, MNU, which sets out to move the aliens far outside of Johannesburg into concentration camps. It’s all wrapped in petty legalism. The aliens must be notified individually of eviction, keeping it all legal and within regulations. Teams are dispatched with armed escorts in order to get signatures from each alien resident in the district.

After the documentary introduction, we zoom in to the point of view of Wikus van der Merwe (Sharlto Copley), a low-level bureaucrat put in charge of the forced migration. Wikus is introduced dorkily struggling with a clip-on microphone and rambling to the camera about the nature of their work. He’s meek and endearingly incompetent, but with an undercurrent of intelligence and strength gleaming through. He understands the alien language, can communicate with them. He’s a quick study of alien behaviors and culture, explaining to the cameras how they make nests, how they eat the rubber tires off of unguarded cars, how to stop a fight before it starts by tossing them food. The cruelty with an honest face becomes rapidly apparent as Wikus supervises the destruction of an alien nest. Joking with a new guy about keeping a souvenir of his first “abortion,” he points out that when the flamethrowers hit the eggs, they explode and sound just like popcorn popping. The brutality is casual, a shrug to the perpetrators because the victims aren’t human. Then the critical moment: Wikus accidentally sprays himself with a black fluid that makes him sick. His team leaves the district, but Wikus’ condition steadily worsens until the horrifying revelation that makes him a target.

Sharlto Copley superbly conveys the descent of a fundamentally decent and quiet man into the depths of hell, transforming from a meek office drone into someone taking up arms to save his own life. It’s a beautiful performance, resembling Edward Norton’s metamorphosis in Fight Club. There’s a particular moment of desperation that ratchets the horror of Wikus’ predicament even tighter: when he stands at a payphone collect calling everyone he knows, none of them accepting the call. “We’ve been friends for 19 years!” He shrieks.

Other characterization is done with a quick hand, letting broad brush strokes show us who these people are, not meandering too deeply as the story moves quickly along. The brutal father in law, the too-pretty wife, the meek bureaucrats, the vicious mercenaries, the superstitious human gangs preying on the prawns. Even the aliens: father, son, red-shirt.

At its heart, the film is about the lines we draw around “us” and “them,” and how truly shaky those lines are. We can accept any sort of horror, any torture, as long as it isn’t one of us. The film feeds on the horror implicit in how easy it is to carry a one and move someone back and forth across that line. A man in charge of an operation can in five minutes become nothing more than a pile of resources “worth billions of dollars,” that must be harvested quickly. Anesthesia? That’s for people not things, it might interfere with the procedure. Vivisection first, get the heart out as quickly as possible.

Bits and pieces of humor run throughout, laugh-out-loud gallows humor. The authorities release photoshopped footage of Wikus screwing one of the aliens to explain his condition, to turn the sentiment of any friends and family against helping him. It’s mined here and there, a thug asking Wikus late in the film whether he’d used a condom. An alien asks Wikus why he killed a man after insisting that there should be no killing and Wikus erupts with the inarguable logic of “that was before he tried to kill me.

It is an intelligent and layered film, but as the old adage goes, ideas are boring, so if you must tell a story about ideas, be sure to wrap it with a bunch of explosions. MNU’s primary concern is in figuring out a way to allow humans to use the prodigiously powerful alien weapons. And these aren’t wee little ray guns, we’re talking exotic rifles that auto-target and detonate people like spam in a microwave. And the jaw dropping kingmaker: gorgeous ten foot tall power armor that single-handedly eradicates entire squads of soldiers sent to take it down.

One complaint of other reviewers has been that the central questions of the film are never resolved. They’re missing the point. We never find out why the aliens came, why most of them seem to have no understanding of their own technology, why they never rose up against those holding them. But that’s because the story is told tightly focused on Wikus. He is preoccupied with survival during the 72 hours over which the film unfolds. He is not in any position to learn those tidbits, and the answers, while tempting, are completely irrelevant to the story being told here. If given, such answers would just be tacked on, gratuitous to the personal journey of Wikus.

The film ends in a curious mix of triumph, tragedy and ominous anticipation. One hopes that the implied and inevitable sequel can live up to the high bar set in District 9.

Steven Lloyd Wilson is the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. He is a hopeless romantic who can be found wandering San Diego’s strip malls and suburbs looking for his mislaid soul and waiting for the revolution to come. Burning Violin is still published weekly on Wednesdays at www.burningviolin.com, along with assorted fiction and other ramblings.


Avatar Review | The Hurt Locker Review





Comments

JUST got back from seeing this movie, it was every bit as awesome as implied here, what are you doing, get in the car, go go go etcetc.

Posted by: danny at August 14, 2009 7:31 PM

I was at a midnight showing last night. Didn't know what to expect but was completely blown away by how...great the film was. The music fit in too...the CGI wasn't bad...it was a sci-fi movie that was relateable.

Great review!

Posted by: Luke at August 14, 2009 7:32 PM

I am really excited about this movie.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at August 14, 2009 7:33 PM

Ooooohhhhhhhhhh CANNOT. WAIT.

Posted by: Ginger at August 14, 2009 7:33 PM

They’re missing the point. We never find out why the aliens came, why most of them seem to have no understanding of their own technology, why they never rose up against those holding them. But that’s because the story is told tightly focused on Wikus.

Absolutely. I made this very point in my review. Good stories narrow their focus. Bad stories try to be about everything and answer every question. These objections are minor quibbles at best.

Posted by: Rubin Safaya at August 14, 2009 7:34 PM

I had my hopes up so much for this movie, and I was biting my nails waiting to see the verdict provided by this site. You have no idea how happy I am to hear how awesome it is.

Now I have to wait until tomorrow night to see it! Curses! :shakes fist at sky:

Posted by: Jackie Bea at August 14, 2009 7:38 PM

I've been waiting all day for your review (you are the only assholes in the interwebs that I trust). I'm going to see this tonight. YAY!!! So glad it's fantastic.

Posted by: Peach at August 14, 2009 7:39 PM

Yes!!!

I saw this for work a couple of weeks back and absolutely loved it. I'm actually planning to see it again tomorrow, and giddy with anticipation.

I'm glad you not only dug it, but understood it so insightfully. Great review, Steven!

Posted by: ShinyKate at August 14, 2009 7:51 PM

Oh thank Godtopus, I was going to have to cut some bitches if this one tanked.

Thanks for the review SLW.

Posted by: admin at August 14, 2009 8:01 PM

I am deeply relieved! I have been waiting for this since seeing the first trailer posted on this site and now am really looking forward to it.

Posted by: Spender at August 14, 2009 8:08 PM

Feeling VERY optimistic about this one.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 14, 2009 8:14 PM

I'm hoping to see this on the weekend. I'm 90% going to experience the film, and 10% going to see if they put my name in the credits.

Posted by: Lauren at August 14, 2009 8:24 PM

I can't read your review, which is killing me because I love your pieces, but I don't want to read any real reviews until I've seen the movie. I'm so anxious to see this one, and I don't know if I can get there until at least Sunday evening. Anyway, my point is that I can't wait to see this film and I can't wait to come back and read your review.

Posted by: Cindy at August 14, 2009 8:53 PM

Allllright. Seeing this tomorrow.

Posted by: Mick J at August 14, 2009 8:58 PM

ok, i've barely skimmed the comments to gather that this doesn't suck. i'm reading no further until after i see it tomorrow.
why, oh why can't the bugs fly home? i'm going cRa-Zy!

Posted by: gp at August 14, 2009 9:36 PM

Yes! Between this movie and Moon, I think that 2009 is a good year for scifi. Mr Stardust and I are going to catch this tomorrow night. Can't wait.

Posted by: stardust savant at August 14, 2009 9:45 PM

I'm glad to hear the film is as good as it looks. Can't wait to see it. I just hope that between actually being a quality film and the amount of marketing they seem to have done for it, it gets some big numbers. It would be a little tiny soothing balm on the burn of shitty Transformers/GI Joe doing so well.

Also, I know this has been brought up before in other discussions, but I think it always bears repeating. A good story is a good story, and there are really only a handful of story themes that we humans play out over and over again. "Us vs. them" is one, love in the face of obstacles (a la Romeo & Juliet) is another, etc. It's somewhat beside the point to say, "Well, this story rips off this older story", or, "That's just xxx story in a different wrapper." Yeah, all the stories have been told already. Every work of fiction is just some variation on a known theme.

The question is, how well is the story told? Some people prefer their themes dressed up in a costume drama, some prefer spaceships and guys in rubber suits. No matter what the "genre" it's wrapped in, a good story is a good story. Period.

Posted by: MM at August 14, 2009 9:47 PM

Totally agree: this movie was good mix between thought-provoking ideas and good action. I was even surprised by where the plot went a couple times, meaning the film didn't take the cheesy way out. Loved it.

Side note: Did Wikus remind anyone else of Murray from Flight of the Conchords?

Posted by: kelsy at August 14, 2009 9:57 PM

Just got back from seeing it. Fascinating movie, particularly in the parallels it draws in terms of the Districts and the Apartheid-era townships, and how quickly people forgot what those days were like. It's xenophobia serves as an interesting allegory for the townships that still exist, and how people, despite wanting to feel sympathetic towards its denizens, are really just disdainful. Even the title, District 9, is an interesting homage, the ET version of District Six, the old township that the government used to repeatedly demolish to try to drive the black residents away.

All of its political and social subtext aside, it's a fucking great movie, and a brilliant sci-fi movie. Great review, SLW.

Posted by: TK at August 14, 2009 10:19 PM

Really freaking excited for this one.

Posted by: Kiddo at August 14, 2009 10:32 PM

Aweseome. The viral ads didn't really interest me. But after this review I really want to see this film.

Posted by: EricD at August 14, 2009 10:43 PM


I just got back. This was a great movie. I can't imagine someone not liking it, but I'm sure it'll happen.

Folks wanted to adopt the little Johnson boy.

To the large and beastly red-headed woman who sat in front of me: the look of horror on your pudgy face when I asked you to please turn off your goddamned cell phone in the middle of the *spoiler* lab escape scene almost made up for the irritation of having the screen blaze to life and blind my row. It did not, however make up for the sight of your ugly ass bare feet up on the railing all night.

Glad you texted her back, though; I'm relieved to know that she got the toilet paper she wanted.

Anyway, amongst all of the shitty movies that have come out this summer, District 9 is what my brother would call "a diamond in a goat's ass".

I hope this movie does well. The line for the next showing extended into the parking lot.

Posted by: laredo at August 14, 2009 10:49 PM

I just saw this with Dad, and we both loved it. An intellectually stimulating film served with a side of beautiful destruction, what's not to love.

Peter Jackson seemed to combine the different violence's of Lord of the Rings with his old school horror days, and the result is spectacular. Add that with an ingenious commentary on racism, scapegoating, Nazism, and survival, and you have the stuff of legend. I say, without reservation, that District 9 is the best film of the year so far, and yes, I did see 500 Days (of Summer), Moon, Coraline, Up, and Star Trek.

Although, I wouldn't recommend this movie for the weak of heart. It's gory as all hell. Blood and goyle fly around the screen like fireworks, and the film is very dark in both humor, and premise. But if you can get past that, you're in for brilliance. Nice review, Stripe, you really did this film justice.

Posted by: George at August 14, 2009 11:09 PM

Saw the midnight show, thought it was pretty good. Really enjoyed the clever social satire for about 3/4s of the movie; the *SPOILER* "Transformers" ending, eh, not so much. Seems liked something this smart deserved not to lower itself to a standard shoot-em-up.

Still, I had high (but not ridiculous) expectations and it pretty much met them.

Now to badger the South African native I work with to go see it. I hear there are a lot of inside Suthafrikn jokes he'll probably get.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at August 14, 2009 11:36 PM

Could I take a moderately corrupted 12 year old to see this?

Posted by: chris at August 15, 2009 12:21 AM

Uh, about the 12 year old...

MINOR SPOILERS
Your best judgement, but I cringed a lot (in a good way for me though): Nails are ripped off, bodies explode in cascades of blood in multiple ways, limbs are severed and then smashed, there's lots of beatings, executions, etc.

Posted by: Stacynotstacey at August 15, 2009 12:29 AM

Not to mention there are 127 f-bombs, but your 12-year-old probably hears that many in the school hallways every day. Unless he/she goes to public school, then it's probably fewer.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at August 15, 2009 12:47 AM

At least I think that's what I was hearing, it wasn't always easy to tell with the Suthafrikn and alien accents. I know an Irish barmaid who pronounces it fookin, and it sounds like poetry.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at August 15, 2009 12:49 AM

Thanks for the input. The f-bombs don't bother me. The graphic violence a little more... he's old enough to know that Twilight sucks while Let The Right One In does not. If I take him, I'll make up a safe word.

Posted by: chris at August 15, 2009 1:00 AM

But did you see Drag Me to Hell, George?
Top that!

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at August 15, 2009 1:54 AM

Let me second the "best year of the movie" title for District 9.

You want suspense? D9 has it. You want tremendous action? D9 tops GI Joe and Transformers by miles! You want drama? D9 has moments of far more emotional context than Michael Mann's Public Enemies.

Blomkamp continues using the same faux-docu style from his short films and lends an air of believability to the proceedings. He shows a far sturdier hand at directing action than Michael Bay did with Transformer 2! And the special effects blend in so seamlessly that you buy the "prawns" as existing in that space next to the humans.

But what really hits you is the story and how Blomkamp has crafted a beautiful allegory about humanity and how we tend to ignore its qualities in one another. Seeing District 9 and the treatment of the aliens, it's not difficult to draw comparisons to places like Darfur, the City of God and the Paris Slums' riots.

Great movie. The best movie.

Posted by: Fredo at August 15, 2009 2:28 AM

Copley was really good. The movie doesn't work if you don't care about what happens to him and he certainly made me care. I was even rooting for the aliens. Definitely one of the best movies I've seen this year.

Posted by: Dave at August 15, 2009 2:44 AM

Just got back from seeing it. It was...heavy. The Mr. & I didn't talk about it for 10-15 minutes after we left - just kind of absorbed. Highly recommended.

Posted by: That_Damn_Monkey at August 15, 2009 3:08 AM

I didn't know fx could look so damn good at that budget. Way to wield that camera, Mr. Blomkamp. Here's to your next trip!

Posted by: coryo at August 15, 2009 3:49 AM

It is an intelligent and layered film, but as the old adage goes, ideas are boring, so if you must tell a story about ideas, be sure to wrap it with a bunch of explosions.

I saw District 9 last night, and this sums it up perfectly. It sort of strays from documentary to action flick and then back to documentary. It's like a poorly-endowed Hollywood producer came in late in the game and said "EXPLOSIONS! Need more EXPLOSIONS!"

Which is not to say it wasn't a great film.
Merciless social commentary = good
Merciless social commentary + giant laser guns = awesome!

Posted by: Whiny Dancer at August 15, 2009 6:53 AM

I don't know if you guys have seen the short film Yellow that Neill Blomkamp did but you can check it out on youtube at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jmd8BDiB-qU

Posted by: Stacynotstacey at August 15, 2009 7:01 AM

Saw it last night, and it's pretty intense. *SPOILER* Wikus' personal transformation/journey from oppressor to oppressed was the real story, wrapped up in the pretties of an action film. I loved the documentary style for history, and was impressed with the misdirection it provided in the beginning.

As my husband said when we left, "Rednecks got nothin' on South Afrikaans." But yah, we realized that they were representative of humans as a whole.

Overall, an excellent sci-fi movie because it had a real story.

Posted by: gemthing at August 15, 2009 7:10 AM

OMG, he looks so handsome. He is my favorite. Just saw his profile on milllionaire personals site ___________W e a l t h y D a t e r. C O M_________ last week. I am wondering what kind of relationship he is looking for on that site.

Posted by: lookmalia at August 15, 2009 8:47 AM

This has to be my favorite movie of the year. The representation of the


**SPOILER***

Nigerian arms dealers is dead on including the belief in witchcraft. I worked in Lagos for a while and had the misfortune to interact with people in that profession. It looked like Wirkus was walking into a back street slum market in Area Boys territory, even including the muzzled hyena.

Posted by: Adam C at August 15, 2009 9:08 AM

Fredo and coryo are right about the FX, which are seamless and entirely believable in the context of the world the movie creates.

One thing I thought was interesting: From the start we're encouraged to look at the aliens as vile and loathesome and stupid, and they ARE, so we can easily identify with their oppressors: I sure wouldn't want these ... THINGS living next to me. Better to shuttle the ugly bastards out into the middle of the desert where I won't have to think about how disgusting they are. It isn't until halfway through that we're encouraged to sympathize with them at all.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at August 15, 2009 10:41 AM

BTW, the weekend hijack thread will be "The Time Traveler's Wife."

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at August 15, 2009 10:44 AM

Saw this late last night in a Nashville theater full of teenage date couples who were clearly expecting something more along the lines of Alien vs Predator. I'd be hard-pressed to guess whether the post-film deathly silence and desperate scramble for the exits was more a product of disappointed confusion or fundamental trauma. The way this is being marketed (here, anyway) as a dumb monster movie is the sort of bait-and-switch that I can wholeheartedly approve of, reminiscent of the misty past, wherein the whole fucking plot of the movie wasn't given away in the trailer.

Not that you need someone who comments once a year - maybe - to tell you, but you've got to see this.

Posted by: jed at August 15, 2009 11:22 AM

Much of the gallows humor seemed lost on the crowd, but our group loved it. We had the same type of audience as jed except add in a few groups of teenage boys out for a fun "kill the aliens" movie. I am not sure I have ever seen teenage boys so quiet after a movie. Even out in the parking lot the mood was somber. Two big thumbs up for encouraging introspection while delivering an excellent action film. I was worried about the documentary feel, but it made it all the more believable. As many others have said, GREAT MOVIE!

Posted by: Lively at August 15, 2009 1:21 PM

Yeah, jed. There was a lot of inappropriate clapping in my theatre. Not. Cool. And yeah we weren't encouraged to sympathize for the first long while in the movie, but if you ever go to a city with a slum like that, you're not encouraged to acknowledge the people inside exist at all. The movie was existing honestly and by eventually encouraging us to root for the aliens, pulling a much more real and effecting switch than if we'd been on their side from the beginning. The first time you walk through Kibera slum in Nairobi, you're not sure you can be on their side. But you have no choice but to be.

Posted by: coryo at August 15, 2009 1:35 PM

I'm now going back into my past and inserting constructed memories to the effect that there was a District 9 toy line in the 80s that was really cool and fun to play with, and was supported by a decent comic book, but had a terrible animated show to sell the line, and as a result, everyone thought that the property was only a stupid kids' cartoon and could never be anything more. For years, it was thought by suits that there was no compelling and realistic story at its core that could be translated into cinema and pay off everyone's frustrations with the poor handling by the ham-fisted toy company and animation house that spawned it. Then Jackson and Blomkamp come along and vindicate the property with an excellent film adaptation.

This story, one of humanity and inhumanity revealed through the medium of a scientific development, was crafted in harmony with an action movie featuring robots, aliens, spaceships, elite military forces, and fascinating space guns.

That they did that shouldn't be amazing.

Posted by: laredo at August 15, 2009 3:03 PM

The brutal father in law, the too-pretty wife, the meek bureaucrats, the vicious mercenaries, the superstitious human gangs preying on the prawns.

Thank you for that.

My movie crew and I saw this last night. All of us are African-American. Many in the group felt the portrayal of the Nigerian gangs as superstitious, savage criminals was another in a long line of racially charged slights against native African peoples. Two felt the point of the movie was to illustrate how ALL humans were the superstitious savage criminals in an effort o induce out sympathy for the aliens. I was one of them.

I'm glad to have confirmation that I'm not the only one who "got it".

Posted by: ceejeemcbeegee at August 15, 2009 3:35 PM

"the portrayal of the Nigerian gangs as superstitious, savage criminals was another in a long line of racially charged slights against native African peoples."

Well, the key word there is Nigerian gangs, not Nigerians as a people. I'm from South Africa, go back every year or so, and in the townships, that's a wholly accurate description of the Nigerian gangs.

Posted by: TK at August 15, 2009 4:54 PM

Guy I work with is a South African native, lived there through high school. I was telling him about the Nigerian gang in the movie and he said it's true, such gangsters have become a big problem, running drugs and such. Apparently they're the Bolivians of the Africa.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at August 15, 2009 5:09 PM

This movie is the mark Hollywood has been missing all summer.

Posted by: laredo at August 15, 2009 6:12 PM

I have to also disagree with your friends but for a different reason. The reason we see Nigerians portrayed in this as savage criminals is because this movie only really focuses on District 9. The reason you don't see any friendly Nigerians in this movie is because of this simple point: what the hell would friendly nigerians be doing living in an alien inturnment camp in South Africa? That's a bit of a trip isn't it? The only ones that made the trip did so for that one horrible purpose. They made it perfectly clear that all the normal citizens wanted to be as far away as possible. The movie was showing all the different groups preying on the alien refugees and the fact that MNU was the worst of them all proves that they are mistaken. Anyone who disagrees with the Nigerians depiction in this movie should first hang out with a Nigerian gang for awhile and then go ahead and disagree once they know what they're talking about. Anything else is just a broad overgeneralisation that shows one's propensity to finding slights where they do not exist. I, for one do not feel like a victim because the viscious MNU soldiers were white.

Posted by: Smatt584 at August 15, 2009 6:19 PM

Just walked out of a matinee showing. Steven, your review is excellent and spot-on. The audience's take on the film was mixed. I think a third of the group was turned off by the multiple layers to the film, the other third was shocked by the violence and unpleasant nature of several scenes, while my third was happy to have seen the best science fiction movie in years. Yes, I did put the "science fiction" modifier on there, but I'll also say it's one of the best films I've seen this year. And to bucdaddy's comment about the slow evolution of the audience's feelings toward the "prawns", I think not only was this intentional on Blomkamp's part, but also key to his overall message.

Posted by: NJ at August 15, 2009 6:54 PM

how they eat the rubber tires off of unguarded cars
---
Strange that in 20 years the South Africans couldn't figure out a way to make money and keep the aliens fat and happy by solving the world's tire-recycling problem. Imagine if they taught the prawns to fart condoms and shit boots.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at August 15, 2009 7:39 PM

I worked for Eoyal Dutch Shell as a security contractor in Nigeria and the portrayal of the Nigerian gangs is completely accurate down to the hyena I mentioned before and one usually real bastard in charge either in a wheelchair or on crutches...

Posted by: Adam C at August 15, 2009 7:48 PM

In regard to the Nigerian gangs in the film, they also act as a great foil to the MNU. Not to put too fine a point on it, but both sides want to dismember and consume Wikus. Sure, the Nigerians want to use a machete and literally eat his flesh whereas the MNU will dice him up surgically and feed his flesh into their labs, but the basic impulse is exactly the same: consume my enemy and I gain his strength.

I think it is a very conscious decision by the director to have two distinct sets of oppressors, one essentially black, one essentially white. Though there were blacks working with MNU (both of Wikus' companions at the beginning, for example), the later mercenaries were (I believe) exclusively white. So you've got the somewhat stereotypical rich white multinational and the somewhat stereotypical poor black native gangs, and both act with exactly the same brutality towards the prawns. Again, not to put too fine a point on it, but the idea here is that oppression is a crime of power, not of ideology, race, or class. Those designations might be useful tools for the oppressors, but they are means not ends. At the end of the day, the boot is on your neck because it suits the whims of the wearer.

Posted by: Steven Lloyd Wilson at August 15, 2009 7:48 PM

That's Royal Dutch Shell, not some Milne donkey company...

Posted by: Adam C at August 15, 2009 7:50 PM

Excellent point, SLW. I was thinking about ceejeemcbeegee's comment and wondering what he/she thinks about "savage criminals" like Mugabe and al-Bashir. Thugs and dictators don't usually respect color lines.

Like all good science fiction films should, this one grows more interesting after you've seen it.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at August 15, 2009 8:25 PM

"Like all good science fiction films should, this one grows more interesting after you've seen it."

And, I suspect, will grow more even interesting after repeated viewings. I've already cleared a space on ye olde DVD shelf.

Posted by: TK at August 15, 2009 8:42 PM

Yet another writer who doesn't understand the difference between a review and an overview.

Posted by: Malon at August 15, 2009 8:49 PM

I just saw this movie today and I LOVED it. I want to have its babies... tiny, mothership-repairing, prawn babies.

I can't even remember the last time I left a theater and thought "I want to see this movie again, immediately!"

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at August 16, 2009 12:05 AM

test

Posted by: Jessie at August 16, 2009 12:14 AM

D-9 was the sh*t - period. It's not my favorite movie this year (THIRST!) but I would see it again and again.

Nothing like intelligent sci-fi with big ass guns and imploding bad guys.

Posted by: Grrravy at August 16, 2009 12:58 AM

Who imploded? All I saw was folks a'poppin'.

Posted by: coryo at August 16, 2009 3:26 AM

All I can say about this flick: YES, YES, A THOUSAND TIMES YES!

This is the kind of flick you must see twice or more to catch other subtle nuances that you didn't catch the first time because you were to busy trying to register how stunning this one is.

Sequel? Please!

Posted by: Brittany at August 16, 2009 8:25 AM

I went to an afternoon showing and loved it, as did the rest of the people in theater, most of whom applauded. As the credits started to roll, some guy stood up and yelled "You are easily pleased!"

First thought: Who let Comic Book Guy in?

Second thought: I bet that asshole reads Pajiba.

So 'fess up, guys: who was it?

Posted by: myid8myego at August 16, 2009 9:26 AM

Let the backlash begin!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at August 16, 2009 10:07 AM

I loved it. It's pretty frickin great. I didn't laugh but once or twice because it's such a nervy and unsettling film, but I am sure I will laugh more on repeated visits. I don't expect this will do much in the American public since the humans are so unlikeable, but a good size swath of people will appreciate this kind of film who have not been desensitized with all of the other loud splodey schlock out there this summer.

Very cool flick, I concur.

Posted by: jackseppelin at August 16, 2009 11:42 AM

eeeeee i'm going at 5:00 today eeeeeeEEEEEeeeeEE!

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at August 16, 2009 12:32 PM

Fresh off the comments section of Time Traveller's Wife and am returning here to bring up the - to my mind, related - question of emotional manipulation. I liked D9 a lot, and I agree with the reviewer and other commenters that it has much more complexity than it has been awarded (I'm not sure, btw, that I'm ready to dismiss an Apartheid movie as "done" at this stage anyway). I agree, too, that the movie has an interesting ark, in which we feel repulsed by the aliens and only gradually get to know them.

But I felt like the "prawns" that convert us to their side are *too* good and *too* innocent victims of circumstance. I felt like CJ and Lil' Prawn were beyond reproach in everything they did, almost naive in contrast to their intelligence and to the horrors going on all around them. Couldn't there have been more complexity in these characters? Perhaps in the sequel?

Posted by: digger at August 16, 2009 1:15 PM

I was thinking about ceejeemcbeegee's comment and wondering what he/she thinks about "savage criminals" like Mugabe and al-Bashir.

Huh? I was one of the two in my group defending the portrayal of the Nigerian gangs.

Posted by: ceejeemcbeegee at August 16, 2009 1:53 PM

Well, the key word there is Nigerian gangs, not Nigerians as a people.

TK, I think their genuine concern was that mainstream Americans (read: White people) wouldn't see the difference between Nigerian gangs and Nigerian people. You have to admit that in the media Blacks/African Americans/Africans tend to be looked at as a whole groups, and hardly ever as sub-sets of a whole or even as individuals. When ONE of us messes up, it's reflects upon ALL of us.

After this brilliance that is D9, my hope is that more people could make that distinction than could not.

Posted by: ceejeemcbeegee at August 16, 2009 2:09 PM

@digger: I think the Lil' Prawn is innocent (like a kid normally is). But CJ is clearly lying to Wikus when he says he can fix him on his ship -- or at least lying by omitting that he doesn't have enough fluid to fix him AND get back home fast.

Also, why didn't he take the rest of his stranded species back? After seeing his people being subjects for experiments, he's so mad and desperate to free them that he powers up his ship...and leaves over 2 million behind?

(Yes, I know that all of that sets up the motivation for "District 10").

Posted by: Fredo at August 16, 2009 2:50 PM

*spoiler*
(is there anyone who hasn't seen this yet?)
as to why christopher didn't take everyone with him, it was my understanding that he was going to get help and come back.

Posted by: gp at August 16, 2009 2:53 PM

But I felt like the "prawns" that convert us to their side are *too* good and *too* innocent victims of circumstance.

Digger, I think they HAD to be so good to illustrate how bad everyone else was.

And **SPOILERS** I thought it was pretty fucked up for Christopher to let Wilkum think fixing his arm would be a swift process. Wilkum didn't ask how long it would take, but Chris knew and he didn't volunteer that info.

Posted by: ceejeemcbeegee at August 16, 2009 3:24 PM

I think they HAD to be so good to illustrate how bad everyone else was.

The point is the "prawns" are the forgotten, the abused and ignored. They're a great analogy to every group of people who has been exploited, vilified and persecuted.

The smart way Blomkamp got away with it is by having them be the worker bees and not the leaders. They're the "Joe Sixpacks" of the prawn world.

Posted by: Fredo at August 16, 2009 4:00 PM

It's WAY amusing witnessing the collective wood of the Pajiba community over D9. I'm especially intrigued by the Nigerian gang subtext, which is hard to imagine being explored in any seriousness on any other website. I'll have to see if I can coax my stepson into seeing it again, since there's no way Mrs. G will sit through a gore-fest (she's squeamish that way, which is the same reason she'll never watch another Quentin Tarantino movie after Pulp Fiction even though the next one stars Brad Pitt) and I'm out of town on business.

Nice review, Stripe, you really did this film justice.

Posted by: George at August 14, 2009 11:09 PM

That's Stipe42 to you, George -- I'm taking Stripe for myself. I've always assumed SLW had a fondness for REM, but I don't know the origin story.

Posted by: Che Grovera at August 16, 2009 4:22 PM

SPOILER QUESTION FOR THOSE WHO ALREADY SAW THE MOVIE

Did anyone else get the impression Christopher was commander, or at least a member of the original command crew of the ship? I haven't seen anyone else mention that but it really seemed that he knew so much because it was his ship in the first place, he wasn't just a worker who learned. And before being taken they dropped the command module in order to protect him and his (possible) crew, of which he was now the last.

Freaking excellent movie. I would totally be on board for a sequel with this one. I really thought the final shot was going to be Christopher returning with a group of ships and the last thing we see is them arrive and the screen cuts to black.

Posted by: TylerDFC at August 16, 2009 4:46 PM

Just got back from seeing it and I fully concure with the commenters before me: it's excellent. I certainly could have done without the Transformeresque battle but otherwise an excellent film. Unfortunately, most of my theater was full of people wanting to see assplody things and totally missed the complexities of the narrative. I actually heard one Axe wearer say that they should have seen GI Joe. I wanted to respond that they should have as they were taking up valuable elbow room.

Posted by: admin at August 16, 2009 6:30 PM

I actually heard one Axe wearer...

Posted by: admin at August 16, 2009 6:30 PM

I wear Axe. What's it to you?

Posted by: Che Grovera at August 16, 2009 7:44 PM

"At the end of the day, the boot is on your neck because it suits the whims of the wearer."
Excellent point, Mr. Wilson, and a fantastic way to summarize the point of the entire film. When Wikus points out a 'gang sign' on an alien shack, it was as if he could have been in Alexandra, in East L.A., in Thailand, in Bombay, in the Warsaw Ghetto, or in an internment camp for the Japanese - anywhere else that sentient beings are stripped of their dignity by the collateral damage done by the desires of the fortunate wielders of power. Humans are capable of atrocities no matter where they are, and the social problems plaguing people who've been abused by power make it easier to disdain them, no matter how they look or act. The prawns seem like easily dismissible animals because they've been reduced to a primal scrabble for food and resources that, for lack of a better word, dehumanizes them and makes them objects of contempt.
***SPOILER***

The lab scene was a horrific example of just what happens when we allow prejudices to diminish the value of other beings. It was reminiscent of what I am sure Dr. Mengele was responsible for in Nazi Germany. This was the first time that I have been able to identify on a visceral level with the tragedies of genocide and poverty I've been known about my whole life, and I only wish more people were ready to see this movie and think about it.

Posted by: misslit20 at August 16, 2009 7:55 PM

I wear Axe. What's it to you?

I think I could smell you in the theater next to me. In between assplosions, of course.

Posted by: admin at August 16, 2009 8:17 PM

If all I smell next to me in a theater is Axe, I'm not going to bitch.

Posted by: laredo at August 16, 2009 8:26 PM

I wear Axe. What's it to you?

A) I don't believe you. I think you're just spoiling for a squabble.

B) However, it's your business if you want to wear lady-repellent. Knock yourself out. Along with any bystanders who get too close.

Posted by: Jerce at August 16, 2009 8:43 PM

Huh? I was one of the two in my group defending the portrayal of the Nigerian gangs.

Posted by: ceejeemcbeegee at August 16, 2009 1:53 PM
---
My sincere 'pologies, I must have misread your comment.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at August 16, 2009 8:54 PM

I wear Axe. What's it to you?

A) I don't believe you. I think you're just spoiling for a squabble.

Posted by: Jerce at August 16, 2009 8:43 PM

Curses. Foiled again. Here's the right idea:

If all I smell next to me in a theater is Axe, I'm not going to bitch.

Posted by: laredo at August 16, 2009 8:26 PM

Posted by: Che Grovera at August 16, 2009 9:06 PM

it looks sad. If I got see this will I cry for the aliens??? :(

Posted by: erika at August 16, 2009 10:14 PM

Yes, Erika. Yes you will. Dude, when I went to see this, two people actually walked out. They walked the fuck out! Of an excellently awesome movie! I thought about dumping my popcorn on their shoes, but I'm a greedy bastard. And I don't wear Axe.

Posted by: Captain Steve at August 16, 2009 10:40 PM

You'll weep that a decent sci-fi action movie is being treated as an art house think piece because the rest of the films out now are such shite.

I feel very fortunate that the south Tulsa rednecks in my viewing dug the flick. I would have felt renewed shame for my birthplace if folks had not "got" this one.

Posted by: laredo at August 16, 2009 11:25 PM

oh wow, laredo, i can't remember if i knew you were in tulsa too or not. maybe i did.

but there are a LOT of tulsans on pajiba. it's like we've been corraled.
into our own district....

oh god no.

Posted by: gp at August 17, 2009 12:30 AM

Best sci fi movie in years (best of the decade maybe?). also possibly the best movie of the summer hell even the year, i loved the hangover but d9 blew me away!

Posted by: SomethingToTakeTheEdgeOff at August 17, 2009 12:33 AM

I'm kinda new around these parts.

Yes, Hangover, District 9, Moon...these alone did not disappoint me this summer.

I can't say enough about the production design of Moon and District 9. After years of smeary blobs of CGI shit created by art school dropouts, it's nice to see some hardware that looks like it could actually work.

Posted by: laredo at August 17, 2009 12:44 AM

Really great movie - I am glad everyone found it to be so. Had no idea what it was about when I went in; was very pleasantly surprised. Apart from the story being really good, the movie was also very well done. Definitely made me sad to think about how gross and cruel people can be; I also wonder if parts of the movie make south africans cringe because of their own history. Thought it was interesting someone brought up that people had some unanswered missing-the-point type questions - none of those ever occured to me while watching the film (where did they come from, why did they land, why couldn't they leave, etc). A breath of fresh air among all the crappy summer blockbusters.

Posted by: surly suzie at August 17, 2009 1:51 AM

Jesus fucking Christ. This only comes out in SA in TWO WEEKS TIME. Aaaargh.

Posted by: Saartjie at August 17, 2009 6:25 AM

WANT.TO.GO. NOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWW!!!

Posted by: dammitjanet at August 17, 2009 8:47 AM

Am I the only one who found the little child alien cute? *spoiler* When he comes up to Wikus and holds out his arm and says, "We are the same", my heart melted a little bit. Of course Wikus reacted like a douche and I wanted to shout at him, "Don't push the child, what is WRONG with you!".

I also had the unfortunate experience of having a group of teenagers sit behind me in the theater. After the movie I could hear them laughing and talking about the "weird accents". One girl even said, "Why is that guy trying to sound British? He doesn't even sound British!". I had to physically restrain myself from shouting at this girl that the movie takes place in South Africa, and that is how they speak there, and OH MY GOD WHAT ARE THEY TEACHING YOU KIDS IN SCHOOL THESE DAYS, CAN YOU EVEN PICK OUT SOUTH AFRICA ON A MAP?!!

End rant.

Posted by: Norwego at August 17, 2009 9:52 AM

Um...I suppose now's a good enough time to remind everyone I'm a former Tulsan, born and raised.

Cascia Hall class of '87, y'all. Yes, I'm old. I also have a power ring. Deal with it.

Back on thread - I can't wait to see D9, and am very happy that it's actually both as thought provoking and "neato" as it seemed.

Posted by: Green Lantern at August 17, 2009 10:22 AM

Jesus christ, I want to see this again. Saw it at a midnight screening with my brothers, my girlfriend, and a huge geek friendly audience. Everything a year's wait should be worth.

Posted by: Doctor Controversy at August 17, 2009 10:47 AM

The only people who won't like this movie are those mind-numbed sycophants of formulaic plots. As mentioned in the review, it's irrelevant to the story why the alien leaders are gone. But I'm sure many people will decide this is a bad movie because they didn't get "closure". Since the lack of closure was one of the aspects of this movie that truly worked, I'm desperately hoping that the obligatory sequel won't attempt to be that closure and wind up as just another simple, boring formula designed to make a few more bucks to the detriment of a surprisingly good movie.

And kudos to the director for selecting the unknown Sharlto Copley for the lead instead of Nicolas Cage or whatever still recognizeable falling star was willing to sign on. Copley's Wikus was fantastic!

Posted by: altan at August 17, 2009 12:12 PM

This movie was fuckin great. I was trying to explain to my friends that if they told the who what where when and whys of the aliens coming to earth it would of been stupid. There is no way to explain all of that without the movie turning into complete bullshit.

One word to describe this movie: CLEAN. Wouldn't change a thing.

Posted by: Sad Rockstar at August 17, 2009 1:01 PM

TylerDFC,

Answer to your SPOILER questions, meaning SPOILER answer:
I read an interview with Blomkamp, I think linked from Pajiba, in which he addressed that question. He said that he like the idea of certain among the population rising up to fill the vacuum left by the leadership. And yeah, it took twenty years, but it happened. A sort of group survival method/initiative and it just started with Christopher.

SPOILER done.

Posted by: coryo at August 17, 2009 1:48 PM

This was done as a movie with James Caan, right? I mean, in the end, we are talking about a better remake of Alien Nation.

Posted by: Chuck B. at August 17, 2009 2:04 PM

Norwego - I thought the lil' alien was cute too.

Chuck B. - Not really, since the aliens in this movie were totally segregated.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at August 17, 2009 3:38 PM

Chuck B. >> District 9 is much more action-driven than Alien Nation, which I thought was more of a buddy-cop action-drama.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at August 17, 2009 3:47 PM

I'm a little surprised that there are no complaints about the incessant camera-shake.

I personally had no problem, but two people in my group were sick by the end.

Pussies ;-)

Posted by: brutus at August 17, 2009 5:40 PM

At its heart, the film is about the lines we draw around “us” and “them,” and how truly shaky those lines are.
Sounds like this is the social commentary "Crash" wishes it was.

Posted by: ShannonAnn at August 17, 2009 5:48 PM

Awesome movie... highly recommend..

Posted by: Ron at August 17, 2009 6:09 PM

Who caught the "Tetra Vaal" easter egg during the MNU building assault? Fess up. :-)

Posted by: Barry at August 18, 2009 2:26 PM

Hmmm
Aliens in big ship: check

Aliens slave workers: check

Aliens have no knowledge of their tech : Check

Aliens deal with prejudice : Check

Alien mcgufin at the movie center: Check

Perspective? Different
Dressing: Chase not buddy cop.
Person realizing right of aliens:Check

I dunno....seems pretty close to Alien Nation to me. At least superficially so.

Posted by: Chuck B. at August 18, 2009 3:15 PM

Just got back from seeing it and loved it so much I'm commenting on what is surely a dead thread.
ROCKED MY FACE OFF, just like I was hoping for.
Interesting as hell, placing it in Johannesburg. Amazing, just amazing. I'm finally getting that whole "sci-fi" thing. Maybe. Says the girl who is addicted to Doctor Who and Torchwood and the like, but still insists that she doesn't like sci-fi.

Posted by: myysharona (formerly Sharon) at August 21, 2009 1:56 AM

Saw this last nite and all i can say was i had several geekasm in the theater. I went tru every a series of emotion that i didnt think was possible for a sci fi movie.

SPOILER
1

2

3

The alien weapons were so fokin awesome. ppl exploding like watermelon left and right.

the whole Mech Warrior thing?

HOLY SHIT!!!!!!!!! I was so so pumped.

And when Wickus actually goes back for Chris? And he was shielding him and then tells Chris to go on without him? It was so so powerful despite having seen those kind of scenes before.

It's because of how much Wickus despised him from the betrayal and before because he is a prawn n all.

And when the robot turns back and goes shitballs crazy on the MNUs? HHAhahaha. i was screaming inside. AWESOME! AWESOME! AWESOME!

If anyone knows what MechWarrior is, then you'll get it. Someone was saying how the robot thing ruined it, IT SO DIDN'T!!!!

@TylerDFC

OMG! You're so right bout the command module thinG!!!! i totally missed it. I was thinking bout it though while watching it. How could Chris build such a ship under his shack wit all dat junk they find. The 20 yrs thing kinda helped.

BUt you're right. Chris was part of the command.

And i thought the reason he was so smart compared to the rest and can actually operate all dat hardware was bcoz of the 20 yrs. 20 yrs is too short for evolution.

He also said dat Wickus destroyed 20 yrs of work.

He dropped down with the command module to refuel. took em 20 yrs to find gas though.

BY THE WAY, did anyone else think that it's weird how the fuel for a spacecraft can also turn you into a prawn? Anyone? A bit too convenient if you ask me. Dats my only, only complaint btw. everything else was crazy awesome.

too bad the ppl i went wit are from those Australia crowd who thought it was "Different" and "It was ok" and this not so into movies guy who thought the prawns had shitty graphics.

I didnt even bother trying to explain how awesome D9 is. Some ppl are just.... blind.

Posted by: haplo at August 21, 2009 1:26 PM

do try to ignore the typos above. just did 4.5 hrs of intense indoor rock climbing.

i'm so out of it but i just had to do this before the page gets too old...

Posted by: haplo at August 21, 2009 1:30 PM

Hmm. I must have seen a different movie. I thought the idea was fantastic but for me, it never delivered. This is my favorite genre in movies. The good ones are few and far between. What do I think was a great film? The first "Alien" movie.

Posted by: Ken at August 21, 2009 7:17 PM

Also, I realized that the theater was showing the original Alive in Joburg as part of the pre-movie stuff. It was great, and very well done. I can see why Jackson squeed all over himself when he saw it.

Posted by: myysharona (formerly Sharon) at August 21, 2009 8:49 PM

Just saw this last night and wanted to put my 0.02 in.

Just brilliant. I had the same reaction afterwards as a few of you, where all I could do is sit in silence, mulling.

I can't even begin to put my thoughts about this movie into words - it's just amazing.

And I also thought the little alien kid was adorable.

Posted by: redhead at August 22, 2009 2:03 AM

Just saw it tonight, loved it, but...SPOILERS!:

I can't quite get over the fact that the alien ship was left hovering totally deserted, empty of the swarms of people I would think would be, in our real world, dedicating their lives to studying such a thing (hmmm...a stowaway or two as a sequel plot-point?), and that the aliens were, while segregated, not quarantined, studied, and supervised by a group of people representing nations worldwide. Not to mention that life went on as usual under this trillion ton ship that was kept aloft who knows how. No worries of it falling someday? Or suddenly exploding/shooting out death rays? Or just emitting dangerous chemicals/fumes/whatever? And why on earth wouldn't anybody have ever tried working WITH the aliens to figure out how to get the darn ship (or anything else) running? And with all of that technology there was no way for the aliens to radio for help? Finally, if the humans want them gone, why not encourage their departure to the mothership instead of trying to shoot them down?

Finally, my guess on the alien population...perhaps it was a prison ship? That would explain their needing to be cut out of their own ship instead of getting back home on their own safely (how sick aliens then thrived, relatively speaking, in an atmosphere alien to them is yet another question.) And perhaps Christopher et. al. were the only fellows with techie brains/crimes on board, explaining the lack of organization/motivation on the part of the others (and the ease at which they were left behind by Chris and his progeny.)

But all in all, great character study, and I'm looking forward to the sequel. Oh, and did anyone note the pictures of children on our hero's wife's dresser at the end of the movie? They looked old enough to be his, yet I don't believe they were ever mentioned. Found that interesting.

Posted by: Lesli at August 23, 2009 12:55 AM

I had a heated discussion after this movie ended with a friend. The implications, ramifications, pathos, the flaws of human emotion. This movie deserves to the BEST alien movie ever made. Hands down.

Gonna buy this film in DVD.

Posted by: tallulahc at August 24, 2009 1:13 PM

Is it weird that I keep checking my teeth after seeing this movie?

I loved D9 and I'm not a big SciFi fan by any means. Compelling story, well-done CGI, awesome acting.

Posted by: monkeyhateclean at August 24, 2009 3:44 PM

Sorry for the longish post, but I've got a dissenting opinion and I wanted to make sense with it. Spoilers...

The emotional scenes in the movie were extremely well-done. Copley does a fantastic job; from the establishing scenes to his casual brutality to his descent into despair, I totally dig his performance. The "lab weapons testing scene" was very emotionally engaging thanks to the superb acting. SFX were very well-done, the aliens look awesome, and when something can be described as a Tesla weapon, I roll around on the floor with joy.

But I thought the sets of "bad guys" were one-dimensional and boring. The portrayal of the MNU guys was especially disappointing, since they could have rationalized the evil: possible benefits to humanity of studying the aliens, advances in computing, medicine, biotechnology, and all the things an advanced civilization could bring, in exchange for a single human life or a handful of alien lives, and isn't that worth the cost, etc etc... you know, make them seem like anything other than your standard-issue action-movie stupid bad guy. I don't know if "empathizing with the villains" is becoming cliche, but it would have made them interesting, AND it would have made Wikus's actions a lot more compelling.

The aliens' behavior towards each other and the humans seemed too, well, human. I didn't pick up that we were "supposed" to be repulsed by them at first, since they struck me right away as human-esque. I understand that they're stand-ins for human groups, and I guess you can't do that while exploring cool concepts behind alien cultures, but I find it hard to believe that a civilization capable of interstellar travel would be so similar to ours -- or would crumble after twenty years in an Earth slum. Even if you wanted to go with the movie's explanation, then why not posit that the aliens would have totally died out if not for the creation of D9? That sets up MNU as misguided heroes who at least try SOME rationalization for their behavior. Then they could argue for D9/D10 as acts of graciousness on humanity's part, a necessary but flawed system of keeping the aliens alive.

Finally, I didn't think the references to oppression and apartheid were all that deep or subtle. Yes, oppression is bad. Dehumanizing people -- or I guess I should say, devaluing life -- leads to acts of monstrous evil. Anyone with a passing knowledge of standard sci-fi plots, or anyone who took psych 101 and read about prison experiments, is familiar with this. I hope that isn't what people are referring to when they say the movie is "intelligent" or "layered," and I hope there's something I'm missing, because it'd be depressing to think that concepts from a middle school reading list count as "intellectualism."

I understand my opinion probably isn't shared by many, and I hope I've explained myself to the point where this post doesn't read like "INSERT STANDARD ISSUE BACKLASH HERE", I just felt the movie was moderate: it's not bad, but I don't think it's mind-blowingly good, either. More importantly for me, it's not as good as it could have been.

Posted by: Atman at August 25, 2009 2:05 AM

BY THE WAY, did anyone else think that it's weird how the fuel for a spacecraft can also turn you into a prawn? Anyone? A bit too convenient if you ask me. Dats my only, only complaint btw. everything else was crazy awesome.

Posted by: haplo at August 21, 2009 1:26 PM

Nope, if all of their weapons respond only to the prawn's biological DNA, what more the ships?

Posted by: Cathy at August 28, 2009 10:54 AM

I agree with you, Atman, 100%. I had heard lots of glowing comments from friends, and was surprised and disappointed to find the movie heavy-handed and obvious in its social commentary, as well as predictable and cliched in its action. What, you're going to set a movie about oppression in Johannesburg? Shocker.

Posted by: Lily at August 29, 2009 2:42 AM

Awesome movie -- outstanding storytelling, white-knuckle pacing (and I'm NOT usually a fan of "action"), and terrific acting. Yes, quite a few elements in the story were familiar and a bit simplistic, but it was nevertheless an absorbing and thought-provoking film. We detected similarities to the character arc in "The Lives of Others" and "Children of Men," among others.

By the way, can anyone tell me who plays the alpha mercenary -- the blue-eyed sadist? I never caught the character's name, so the list of credits on IMDB isn't helpful. Thanks in advance.

Posted by: flickfan at August 29, 2009 11:25 PM

I am terribly sorry, but it seems as if none of you have ever read any good science fiction in your lives. This is one of the worst films I have ever seen. Without a question, made for people to think they have seen something significant. The allegory was apparently too simple for them to be able to make it have a considerable impact on the viewer. The idea is marvellous, dont get me wrong but there is no way the movie succeeded. It is filled with logical inconsistencies, bad acting, completely one dimensional characters, and worse of all a horrendous script. This movie at its core was supposed to achieve the difficult task of pushing the allegory (with aliens this was only that much more difficult) to allow the viewer to understand the true horror of the situation. "Discrict 9" however was simply your usual hollywood overly sentimental action "blow up the bad asshole" film that sadly achieved nothing more but occasional (and highly innapropriate) laughs and the wish that you hadnt just wasted 15 bucks and 2 hours when you could have rented a film like "Come and See" and actually felt somthing significant.
I mean this was even worse than "Julie and Julia"
and that is hard to beat.
This movie tried to be brilliant, funny, touching, sentimental, relevant, upstirring, and serious all at once, without forgetting to appeal to as many people as possible in order to make money.
In short Peter Jackson, whether producing or directing, once again proved to be a person worthy of being ignored.

Ut omnium rerum, sic litterarum quoque intemperantia laboramus.
-Seneca

Posted by: IMiR at August 30, 2009 3:40 AM


A few ounces of black fluid will power a massive starship for intergalactic travel? A few ounces of the same black fluid can also be used to change a human into an alien?!?

And you can get this black fluid by distilling it from alien tech, but for some reason there wasn't any on the freaking city-sized mother ship and they didn't bother making any from the massive tons of tech they had on board? Then what the hell is powering the massive mothership and allowing it to sit there in the sky?

Why, instead of using the massive firepower of the mothership to negotiate what they needed from the humans, they starved themselves and waited to be put into slums?

Come on, give us even the tiniest explanation to hang our disbelief on.

Because it definitely was a fun one to watch.

Posted by: SmellyGirl at August 31, 2009 11:54 AM

I have a friend that stood in line to see transformers and then told me how great it was. i would like to thank Distric 9 personally for teaching us that just because the premise of a film is fantastic(sci fi) that doesnt mean it has to be a ridiculous bubblegum explosion/comedyfest. (see xmen, transformers, gijoe, etc etc)

Posted by: wickedwhisper at September 2, 2009 1:04 PM

No awesome visual effects, but the plot and the characters blew me away. Great movie.

Posted by: watch love happens at September 8, 2009 10:38 AM

To geek out, having just been blown away by this movie:

@SmellyGirl: I viewed the McGuffin black canister as an alien Duracell, of a kind much more powerful than those in the guns; the canister was dead but some meth-lab chemistry catalyzed whatever bio-agent fuels their tech and boom, Duracell charged. The ship was always there, it just took a jumpstart. And if we're assuming the alien tech was DNA activated and miraculously prawns are carbon-based life forms--why not allow that their super powerful bio-reagent fuel might be capable of reverse-engineering a host to match its needs?

Also, knowing that most super-tankers on our oceans are generally manned by cut-rate contract crews largely from my ancestral Philippines, paid a pittance and written off as expendable to the pirates of the African coasts, I thought there was ample explanation for the intergalactic deckhands angle too...

Incredible movie, never thought I'd see a mech-fight transcend eye-candy, but M. Bay: do you see what happens when the pretty shiny shit is given appreciable limitations, story coherence, and some fucking reason for wrecking house? Damn that was solid...

Mark that as the second awesome "District ___" of this year!

Posted by: eskiimomo at September 9, 2009 5:20 AM

Uhm, I don´t know what to think....first of all the film was VERY hard to watch...more disgusting than breathtaking throughout 3/4 of the film...

I mean, even if xenophobia was very, very strong among the white population during Apartheid, I can´t imagine that black people produced the same feelings of disgust in white people than these aliens did in me....it doesn´t need such a film to make people understand situations like the Apartheid...considering that the film also tried very hard to satisfy the horror-blood-action-addicts during half of the film.

And @ IMir: even if I didn´t like the film myself, your "review" is pointless and goofs on the film, without giving any reasonable explanation why the film is bad. And comparing it to "Julie and Julia"?? Sorry, but this is the proof that you don´t have a clue about films and why they are made....

Posted by: Zean-Chris at September 14, 2009 12:19 PM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.