web
counter
 

Tear Ducts: Unscathed

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (50)



Dear John Movie.jpg

After an interminable five weeks of studio movies, Dear John was a most unexpected surprise: It was a film. I would stop far short of calling it a good film, but it had the elements of one: It had actual performances, instead of line readings mixed with funny and/or serious faces; it had a story, instead of a high concept; and it had a director. An honest to God director.

I have no doubt that the Nicholas Sparks novel that Dear John was based on was a sappy, tear-jerking piece of paperback trash, but Lasse Hallström (Cider House Rules, What’s Eating Gilbert Grape) managed to rein (r-e-i-n) it in — the sentimentality was restrained and, at times, even holstered. Given the source material, I doubt any director could’ve won me over, but at least Hallström didn’t offend, nor did he attempt to bang on the heart strings until they were frayed and weak.

The result, however, is actually a film that’s more boring than sappy — Hallström doesn’t tell you that the two people at the center of the story are in love, he tries to show you. And that takes time — it takes a lengthy, slow-paced exposition that drags. That exposition is also all of what the marketing of Dear John presents, suggesting that it’s a cheesy, treacly teenage love drama. It’s really more of an adult soap opera, though that’s not exactly a ringing endorsement.

It’s early 2001, and a special forces officer John Tyree (Channing Tatum), is on leave for two weeks, goofing off on the beach, when he meets Savannah Curtis (Amanda Seyfried). They are immediately taken with one another, and spend those two weeks getting to know one another in almost painful detail. John has a tough guy past that he’s mellowed from, and he lives with his autistic father (the always fantastic Richard Jenkins), who collects coins. Meanwhile, Savannah is somewhat naive and overly kind-hearted.

Once it’s established that they’re in love via walks on the beach and the necessary musical montage, John goes back to the service with promises that they’ll write letters. And write. And write. And so we have to suffer through letter after letter after letter, until 9/11, when John becomes torn between his patriotic duty to re-enlist against Savanah’s wishes, or return home to be with his lady.

Dear John unfolds predictably, and then not. Hallström, it seems, almost takes pains not to give his target audience exactly what they want, which is The Notebook. It’s clearly a spiritual successor to that movie, but it’s not as effusively sentimental — it doesn’t beat you over the head with a loud score or weepy histrionics. I actually appreciated that about Dear John, but I suspect a lot of the women in the audience wanted more, and may have left unsatisfied, while I left relieved that Hallström didn’t try too hard to manipulate.

Nevertheless, Hallström didn’t have a lot to work with — Channing Tatum, even as the stone-faced military guy, is weak and unconvincing. And while the autism subplots gave Richard Jenkins an opportunity to actually act, they felt extraneous (the same goes for Henry Thomas, who had a strong turn as the father of an autistic kid that lived next door to Savannah). Doe-eyed Amanda Seyfried was her usual doe-eyed Amanda Seyfried self — she’s pretty, and likable, but she’s not really much more than that yet.

It’s a decent love story, though. There’s even a kernel of genuine heart in it. It’s not a love story that I’m particularly drawn to — it’s Legends of the Fall only less sweeping and half as dramatic — but I could actually see how a certain audience could leave the theater and not feel disappointed. That’s hardly a recommendation, but it’s at least the first time in 2010 that I’ve left a theater and not felt completely ripped off.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He is forced to run obnoxious ads in order to remain so. If you would like to point out a spelling, factual, or grammatical error, please have the courtesy to email him. Otherwise, comments are very welcome below.









From Paris with Love Review | Taylor Lautner Signs on to Star as Stretch Armstrong













Comments

you're in a good mood. i like that.

Posted by: podface at February 5, 2010 7:50 PM

Well then, it's safe to say it doesn't have the book's ending. Because if you can walk away satisfied, something had to change. Man that book sucked, and I even like some of Nick Spark's work.

Posted by: KatSings at February 5, 2010 8:00 PM

REIN it in.

R-e-i-n.

Dear god.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at February 5, 2010 8:08 PM

Sorry.

I may have a shorter temper than usual, because it appears I now have to click past a commercial/film preview EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. I want to read something or post a comment here.

This site was loading slowly enough as it was.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at February 5, 2010 8:11 PM

That man cannot act. I will not see any movie where he is the lead.

Also, whenever I hear his name, I see Stockard Channing in my mind and am momentarily perplexed.I blame him for being perplexed.

Posted by: Kate at June (formerly Kate) at February 5, 2010 8:13 PM

*Spoiler Alert*

@Katsings, the ending is different in the film. Tim dies, even after John pays for his treatment, and then John and Savannah end up together.

Posted by: becks at February 5, 2010 8:13 PM

Maryscott, thank you, I thought it was just me. It's gotten to the point that I've gotten very hesitant about actually visiting over the last couple weeks.

Posted by: TheMaskedEmu at February 5, 2010 8:20 PM

John Cena, is that you?

Posted by: sailboat at February 5, 2010 8:23 PM

I want to see Channing Tatum fight Hayden Christensen to the death.

Posted by: Stoat(Cat) at February 5, 2010 8:31 PM

I want to see Channing Tatum fight Hayden Christensen to the death.

That's kinda mean. And totally justified.

But wait, that means only one of them dies, right? No good.

Posted by: MM at February 5, 2010 8:33 PM

I'm delighted that Henry Thomas is working again. That guy is fun as hell.

Posted by: replica at February 5, 2010 8:38 PM

Man, I don't know what is going on with you people and your computers, but I NEVER get the adds. The "bing" stuff is annoying and pervasive, but I don't have any problems with slow loading screens or preview interruptions.

Maybe (and this is just a suggestion) you should look into buying a computer that wasn't made in the 1990s. Nowadays, they have computers with Ram measured in GIGABITES! I KNOW! It's pretty spectacular. Also, the various browsers allow for a lot of options when it comes to eliminating adds. Even my work computer doesn't have problems, and it's a hand-built prototype of Bill Gates' (nearly said "Steve Jobs" just so I could use the words "hand" and "job" in the same sentence).

I tease, but seriously the only thing more annoying than the adds is having to listen to people constantly bitch about the adds. It pays for the site people, and the site is awesome (except for those pesky adds).

So anyway, what have we learned? 512mb of RAM ain't cutting it. Seek out Firefox. And if you absolutely MUST complain, please have the foresight to write the overlords personally rather than cluttering up the comment pages.

If I can learn how to do it, you can learn how to do it.

Posted by: superasente at February 5, 2010 9:04 PM

Has anyone still seen Channing Tatum and Wentworth Miller in a room at the same time? Is the goatee the only difference in between? I still sense conspiracy...Chanworth Miltum...I shall expose you...

Posted by: D-Day at February 5, 2010 9:09 PM

Piss off. :) I reserve my right to complain, thank you very much. No need to snark. They are the WORST kinds of ads that come up..on my firefox. Automatic play, full volume, on any thread, not just the main site page...ugh...On my computer with tons of memory. You just cluttered this obviously soon to be popular thread with 4 paragraphs of anti-anti-ad propaganda. Egads!

Posted by: Kate at June (formerly Kate) at February 5, 2010 9:11 PM

firefox and adblock plus keep my browser ad free on every site i visit.

Posted by: stopthemadness at February 5, 2010 9:15 PM

What's it gonna take to get a "fap" tonight?

Posted by: D-Day at February 5, 2010 9:16 PM

Just as there are people who want to voice their annoyance with the adds, there are people who want to voice their annoyance with the add-complainers. I've had my say. My soul is refreshed.

By all means, continue your discussion of "My Other Notebook" or whatever this movie is called. Is this the one Seyfried get's neked in?

Posted by: superasente at February 5, 2010 9:37 PM

Jesus, Maryscott, do you only show up to bitch? Christ.

Posted by: I Love Beets at February 5, 2010 10:01 PM

Henry Thomas? Woohoo, I didn't know he was in this! *fap fap fap* Happy, D-Day?

Posted by: meaux at February 5, 2010 10:23 PM

I tease, but seriously the only thing more annoying than the adds is having to listen to people constantly bitch about the adds.

Closely followed by people who insist on repeatedly misspelling the word "ads".

Posted by: branded at February 5, 2010 10:30 PM

*sigh* True.

Posted by: superasente at February 5, 2010 10:33 PM

That'll do meaux

Posted by: D-Day at February 5, 2010 10:49 PM

About the annoying ads -

I have Firefox with AdBlock AND Flashblock, and they were still getting through to me. But I was told to reset my cookies and see if that helped. It didn't... until I set my browser to stop accepting third party cookies AND to never accept cookies from Pajiba.com. Sure, I have to type in my name, email & website every damn time I post, but now I have absolutely no problems getting the site to load.

So... try that.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at February 5, 2010 10:56 PM

Also, this:

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He is forced to run obnoxious ads in order to remain so. If you would like to point out a spelling, factual, or grammatical error, please have the courtesy to email him. Otherwise, comments are very welcome below.

is why I heart you so, Rowles.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at February 5, 2010 10:59 PM

i myself usually watch it (right now, it's the crazies!!)(or let it play under what i'm doing until it finishes) and go so far as clicking a couple a day.
but for every 1 complaint, there's usually 2 or 3 suggestions on how to get around them.

jesus christ though, people, the ads are what pay for the site. grow a fucking pair and act like you've got some sense.

also, hey meaux.

Posted by: gp at February 5, 2010 11:49 PM

Seriously, I never see an ad.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at February 5, 2010 11:50 PM

I saw this the other night as a free preview... Movies based on Nicholas Sparks books usually make me a bit twitchy (esp. The Notebook. God, that movie.), but this really isn't all that terrible. I thought the relationship between John and his father was handled well and I found that plot line far more interesting that the romantic story. Plus, it was great to see Henry Thomas all grown up.

Posted by: Jess at February 6, 2010 12:18 AM

Can I point something out? You don't actually have a RIGHT to complain. If Pajiba claimed to provide goods or services that you paid for and then didn't receive, then you'd have a right to complain.

Unfortunately, people cannot stop you from behaving like a whinging little brat, but that does not mean your behaviour is protected by law, mkay? (And please, don't insult the awesomeness the 'Free Speech' Right by using that as an excuse to bitch about something as inconsequential (and avoidable) as some stupid pop-ups, because seriously, that's the behaviour of a twatwaffle.)

Posted by: ScienceGeek at February 6, 2010 3:50 AM

Fuck off, Beets. I come here to do plenty more than complain, which you know perfectly fucking well. I had a beef, I aired it, eat me.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at February 6, 2010 3:50 AM

Dammit, I lost a word...
...awesomeness of the 'Free Speech' Right...

And thanks for the review, Dustin.

Posted by: ScienceGeek at February 6, 2010 3:55 AM

Maryscott, may I make a suggestion?
Perhaps next time you decide to air one of your beefs, you could try doing it politely?

Posted by: ScienceGeek at February 6, 2010 5:50 AM

Honestly, we're still complaining about the ads around here? How many times do people have to keep bringing this up. Websites need revenue, people. It's a fact, so deal with it. If you're worried about the sound, mute your speakers for a few minutes. If it's the loading speed, come on, have a little perspective--I mean, it's a couple of minutes' wait, not the fucking pony express.

Meanwhile, if you've got a better suggestion on how the site can make a buck, I'm sure the powers that be would consider them. But good luck with that.

Also, I'm with ScienceGeek. Would it kill folks to just be nice around here?

Oh, and hey gp!

Posted by: meaux at February 6, 2010 7:38 AM

@superasente, well said.

Posted by: rich diculous at February 6, 2010 8:21 AM

Well said, Meaux.

*snickering at the Pony Express bring me my internets*

Posted by: TWoP_Fan at February 6, 2010 10:11 AM

Interested in a discrete and mutually beneficial relationship? http://AgelessOnly.com gives you a chance to make your life better.

Posted by: Patty at February 6, 2010 10:53 AM

She's right. Can't we focus on what really matters? Like discrete and mutually beneficial relationships. How else will you make your life better?

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at February 6, 2010 11:20 AM

Spambot "Patty" gave me an EXTRA laugh, seeing "discrete" means separate while "discreet" means on-the-down-low. Is spambot advertising relationships where you don't actually spend any time with people? Fascinating. I guess painstakingly avoiding people I hate WOULD be mutually beneficial.

Also, I use Firefox with NoScript. I decide what scripts go through to my screen and what scripts don't. It's a very easy way to decide what ads you are and aren't okay with. Problem solved.

Posted by: Nat Kittyface at February 6, 2010 11:32 AM

Oh, man: I hate talking about the ads. The fact that we even have them makes me ill. And no matter how many comments I leave or how many posts I write, I'm still going to get emails complaining about them.

But they are a necessary evil. And the thing about Internet advertising now: Banner ads don't work anymore. Readers like them because they can be completely ignored, which sort of ruins the point of advertising. These obnoxious ads, on the other hand, are effective at least inasmuch as people actually see them. In the future, there will probably be 30 second ads before you can open any web page. It's the only way to get anyone to pay attention to them. I hate it. The readers hate it. But advertisers just won't pay for something that no one pays attention to.

That said: If your browser is working correctly and has cookies enabled (if it's not IE 5 or whatever), you should see only one of those video ads every 24 hours, which you should be able to click out of after five seconds. (Sometimes, it gets glitchy on Google Chrome). It's the best trade-off we can get.

If there are other questions or concerns about the ads that I haven't answered above, please feel free to ask. I'll answer to the best of my ability.

Posted by: Dustin Rowles at February 6, 2010 12:07 PM

I might also point out: We now have a mobile site. It's still a work in progress, but there aren't any ads on it. It runs quickly. And you can read the comments, too (you just can't leave a comment - yet).

Posted by: Dustin Rowles at February 6, 2010 12:09 PM

Ads, schmads. What I wanna know is, does Channing Tatum get his dance on or what? I'm guessing not, but why else would they hire that guy? He's cute, but a little boring, unless he's spinning on his head or taking off his shirt. Either one is acceptable. So which is it?

Posted by: Chickaboom at February 6, 2010 12:50 PM

Nat Kittyface, I took it to mean that she is peddling relationships only to people who are already in one - a discrete relationship from the one you are currently in. Or does she mean a discrete relationship from all the relationships you currently have? Perhaps Spambot is offering us all a completely new kind of relationship, totally different than any we have been in before.

Now that I think about it, both of our explanations are probably completely true.

Posted by: Phaeolus at February 6, 2010 2:54 PM

I LOVE Charming Potato, but will acknowledge that's he's a terrible actor. I LOVE Amanda Seyfried's breasts, until I remember how boring the person they're attached to is. I have no idea why i'm making this post, as i will obviously avoid this movie. Mmm.. boobs!

Posted by: Mikey Likes It at February 6, 2010 10:37 PM

Also, if Henry Thomas is the ET kid, (which i'm too lazy to look up and will thusly assume [correctly] that i'm right), he makes awful movies. run. RUN.

Posted by: Mikey Likes It at February 7, 2010 2:33 AM

Would it kill folks to just be nice around here? -- meaux

I wouldn't be surprised...
Besides, I think that's against the mission statement.

Posted by: Rykker at February 7, 2010 8:33 PM

this movie rocked and savannah and john ended up together after tim died..... I'm glad that they are together..but i feel bad for tim! :(

Posted by: Jerry at February 7, 2010 8:55 PM

Sounds alright, it was sold out at my theatre this weekend and I wasn't annoyed by that. I am actually glad that someone is making a movie (even if it is a cheesy romance movie) about a soldier and his love being apart. People need to see that.

Nice review.

Posted by: Mebe at February 8, 2010 2:39 AM

Sweet LORD with the fucking spoilers people. I have been waiting and WAITING for this film to come out, and now that I know someone dies and somebody else kisses some other person, my entire DAY is ruined. Assholes.

Posted by: Kolby at February 8, 2010 5:04 PM

@Kolby,

Don't feel bad about the spoilers, the movie wasn't that great. My friends and I became "those people" because the random ass "TWIST" made no sense.

Now I have to read the book, because Savannah's reasoning behind marrying Tim (Henry Thomas in full pedo beard) made no sense. There were many ways she could've taken care of the autistic kid. Completely took me out of the movie, though Tatum's face was pricless at the reveal, I agree Channing, WTF???

Seyfried was awful in this movie. When Tatum told her his dad had died, her eyes got so wide, we just started laughing because they be bug eyes going on.

Also, I take issue with the costume department because those shirts she was wearing made her boobs look awful and it was hella distracting. Though, they did make good choices regarding Tatum's surfing outfit, mmmm his back, those shoulders... I'll be in my bunk.

Posted by: kilmo at February 9, 2010 1:53 AM

What?

Posted by: Kolby at February 9, 2010 4:56 PM


a perfect review. i anticipated a " nights in rodanthe "weeper
that would spend most of the time dragging every last tear from
the ducts of sparks addicts. not the case. not a very good film but
a film nonetheless. it would have been better if channing tatum
had a modicum of acting talent.

Posted by: snake at February 24, 2010 7:14 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time