free counter with statistics Dead Snow Review | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

deadsnow.png
We Came to Play, It's What We Do


Dead Snow / Phillip Stephens

Film Reviews | June 18, 2009 | Comments (21)


Tommy Wirkola’s Dead Snow heavily relies on the past, far too content to stack homage upon homage than to forge something unique. The film is little more than a formula larded with references to Wirkola’s favorite films, making Dead Snow nothing more than goofy fan service and a visceral thrill-ride for horror fans. And that’s fine, I guess. I certainly had fun watching the film romp giddily through its gory collage, and the premise - Nazi zombies (!) - is enough to coast on kitsch value alone. Wirkola subscribes to the idea that, so long as the premise is sufficiently ridiculous, there’s no reason for a film to have any depth. I won’t argue with that, but this means his pastiche effort won’t be remembered with the same fervor as his inspirations.

Eight medical students are vacationing in the frigid north of Finnmark, using their Easter break to enjoy some beer-swilling outdoorsy antics when they stumble upon a conclave of undead Nazis slaughtered during the Norwegian occupation. Wirkola enjoys setting up his pins, knowing the audience will be fully aware of the splatterfest in store during the second half, where the film will shift from thriller to slapstick comedy. I’ve mentioned that Wirkola is reference-happy, but it needs to be underscored - Dead Snow is unapologetic, lifting entire segments from Peter Jackson and the Evil Dead franchise (as well as one plagiarized moment from The Descent). One character proudly bears a Braindead (Dead Alive) t-shirt and boasts openly of his fondness for Sam Raimi - probably a stand-in for Wirkola himself.

Despite a tiny budget of about $2 million, Dead Snow looks and sounds great. Production value and camerawork are certainly up to snuff - Aussie cinematographer Matt Weston shoots the action scenes like an extreme sports commercial, with characters heaving in slow-motion with axes and chainsaws akimbo to rend undead flesh, a perfect fit for Wirkola’s meta of pastiche and parody.

Dead Snow certainly earns points for enthusiasm; the last act finds Wirkola doing almost nothing save trying to out-gore the previous scene, as blood rockets from chainsaw wounds and intestines are uncoiled like fleshy ropes. The nastiest moment in the film is, however, a borderline coprophagous sex scene. Wirkola shares Peter Jackson’s perverse joy in presenting the most lurid visuals imaginable and then rubbing the audience’s face in them. The film is as fun as it is asinine, it’s just a shame that Wirkola had nothing new to add to the equation. Homages are always welcome, but Dead Snow’s existence is nothing more than an excuse to pile as many together as possible, nostalgic retrieval without inherent motivation. Now that Wirkola has aired out his resume, it’s time for him to start honing his own ideas rather than endlessly rehashing the past with no intention of moving on.

Phillip Stephens lives in Fayetteville, AR.


Pajiba Love 06/18/09 | Eloquent Eloquence 06/18/09



Comments

the last act finds Wirkola doing almost nothing save trying to out-gore the previous scene, as blood rockets from chainsaw wounds and intestines are uncoiled like fleshy ropes.

SOLD!

Posted by: figgy at June 18, 2009 2:30 PM

I had to look up "coprophageous". I'm not happy I did.

Posted by: eddie at June 18, 2009 2:40 PM

I knew there was a problem when I didn't recognize this word: coprophageous.I really should have known better when I had google define it and failed. Why, why, why did I have to open up a page that had it in the title? WHY is there a word for that!

Unimaginably Gross shit people do should work just fine

Posted by: "luker" the barbarian at June 18, 2009 2:43 PM

What figgy said.

Posted by: admin at June 18, 2009 2:44 PM

Oh dear, it's been so long since I've been by, I feel out of touch. And to start back, a movie about Zombies!

*Sniff* I've missed it here.

Posted by: Xtreme at June 18, 2009 2:44 PM

Eddie: jinx! 1,2,3,4,5,6,

Posted by: "luker" the barbarian at June 18, 2009 2:49 PM

Well, coprophageous will never replace gleet as my favorite word of all time.

Posted by: BWeaves at June 18, 2009 3:00 PM

Bweaves:
So not going to work....I have temporarily learned my lesson. As far as I'm concerned, gleet is the sound Beaker from the muppet show made, and that is ALL DAMNIT!

Posted by: "luker" the barbarian at June 18, 2009 3:02 PM

Ms. Spender is much more a fan of the genre but even I could find a lot of flat-out belly laughs in this movie. I liked the idea that the "Nazombies" were not slow, stupid and clumsy but clever, calculating and very quick on their feet. Was it great? No. Memorable? Hardly. Fun? You betcha!
See it at a matinee, though.

Posted by: Spender at June 18, 2009 3:06 PM

Third you, figgy!

Well, coprophageous will never replace gleet as my favorite word of all time.

Posted by: BWeaves at June 18, 2009 3:00 PM

Yes, a word I learned from "Requiem for a Gleet", wherein Al said....

Swearengen: "Oh God! Mother take me!"
just before Doc stuck a nice, cold, metal probe up his tallywacker.

Posted by: dammitjanet at June 18, 2009 3:16 PM

Sadly, I know what "coprophageous" means because I have a dog.

Posted by: MM at June 18, 2009 3:24 PM

"coprophageous" should be "coprophagous." if you're going to use big words, please spell them correctly.

Oh god...I just shit my pants. Now I feel like a real idiot for lecturing someone else.

Posted by: sosumi at June 18, 2009 3:43 PM

According to Meriam-Webster online, you've misspelled coprophageous. It should be coprophagous. (I had to look it up too)

Posted by: Monkeyboy at June 18, 2009 3:45 PM

Oops, I misspelled Merriam!

Posted by: Monkeyboy at June 18, 2009 3:47 PM

None of these are as bad as sootikin, courtesy of Ranylt.
That word is the perfect revenge. "Oh yeah? Well look up sootikin".

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at June 18, 2009 3:51 PM

Whatever, I thought it was great. Totally loved it. Highly recommended.

Posted by: MDA at June 18, 2009 3:54 PM

I don't have to read the article. The title is a great reference.

Posted by: ChristianH at June 18, 2009 4:50 PM

Anyone who owns a dog should know what coprophagy is.

The one that grosses me out (and I don't gross-out easily) is 'blumpkin.'
The twisted fuck who thought that one up should have his skull caved-in; slowly.

Posted by: Rykker at June 18, 2009 7:14 PM

Smegma

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at June 18, 2009 9:25 PM

Out of twisted curiousity I looked up all those words. If you will please excuse me, I think I will now go stab myself in the face with a fork. I'm fairly sure the sensation will be far more pleasant.

Posted by: redhead at June 18, 2009 10:53 PM

Dear Jesus God, I'm trying to eat here! Why don't I learn?

I've got a cutesier one for ya--frass. Insect poop. I bring it up only because it's the sole bit of knowledge I've retained from my aquatic biology course in college.

Guts and gore don't bother me, but poop--that's where I draw the line. People, you are not supposed to base recreational activities around your excrement.

Posted by: DeadBessie at June 19, 2009 9:41 AM