web
counter
 

Crazy, Stupid, Love Review: Still Searching for that Dare to Be Great Romantic Comedy

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (33)



Crazy-Stupid-Love-Movie (1).jpg

Everything that is associated with — and what many people dislike about — romantic comedies is front and center in Crazy, Stupid Love: Big, schmaltzy romantic gestures; zany misunderstandings; ridiculous makeovers (with the obligatory montage); preposterous leaps of logic; lack of context for the character’s actions; the pour-your-heart-out public speech (at a graduation, no less) and one dumb plot contrivance after another. Under different circumstances with different talent attached, Crazy, Stupid, Love might’ve been no different than any of Ashton Kutcher/Katherine Heigl style romantic comedy to roll out the Hollywood factory every year.

And yet it’s not. If you can temper your groans — and the movie is good enough that it’s not hard to do so — Crazy, Stupid, Love is a sweet, low-key love story, the absolute best movie you could hope for given the circumstances. Steve Carell is likable and lovely, Ryan Goslin is douchebag-charming, Emma Stone is sweet and endearing, and Julianne Moore is, well, she’s in it. The performances are so remarkable, and the direction is so sure handed that, despite your brain’s many misgivings, it’s an easy film to like.

The opening scenes are illustrative of what is right and wrong about the rest of the film. Over dinner, schlumpy Cal (Steve Carell) — in sneakers and a suit a size too big — asks for dessert, and his wife, Emily (Julianne Moore) asks for a divorce. On the ride home, Emily reveals that she’d been sleeping with a co-worker (Kevin Bacon), and Cal jumps out of the moving car. It’s silly and more than a little preposterous, but Carell — full-on wounded soul — sells it and immediately we’re invested in his character.

That character, after moving out, spends the next few nights at a bar where he witnesses the most extraordinarily likable douchebag I’ve ever seen on film take one woman home after another, delivering the same lines to the same kind of buxom plasticine fembots with the same results. Eventually, the womanizer, Jacob (Ryan Gosling), decides he no longer wants to watch the sad-sack Cal mope over his drinks night after night. Jacob decides to turn Cal into an older version of himself. Cal readily agrees because he wants to win his wife back. An unlikely friendship is born.

It works, too — the style-and-personality makeover, that is — and that’s mostly because Carell has never been better than he is in this movie. He is flat-out fucking remarkable, combining his characters from Date Night and Dan in Real Life into a better versions of both: He is wounded, remorseful, and angry, and you can feel every bit of it in his sad, soulful eyes. This is how good Steve Carell’s performance in Crazy, Stupid, Love is: After his Pygmalion transformation, you actually believe — despite what your eyes are telling you — that Steve Carell is a genuinely good-looking guy. We often hear that confidence makes a man more attractive, but you actually witness that in Crazy, Stupid, Love.

The meat of the story is about Cal’s attempts to win back his wife, but where it gets preposterous is all the other little subplots that threaten to detonate the central love story. For instance, Cal and Emily have a 13-year-old son, Robbie (Jonah Bobo), who is in love with his 17-year-old babysitter, Jessica (Analeigh Tipton), who in turn is in love with Cal. Robbie’s infatuation with Jessica plays parallel to Cal’s attempts to win back his wife, and the word “soul-mate” is tossed around more than it should be in a grown-up film. Meanwhile, Jacob ends up falling in love with Hannah (Emma Stone), a recent law school grad trying to shake her “PG-13” existence by banging the slutty guy at the bar. As per the studio formula, she gets under his skin, he changes his ways, and they fall in love.

Coincidences pile on top of coincidences, and the story comes to an all-too-convenient and wildly absurd head that’s almost too hard to swallow, even if it does tastes delicious. Part of you will be rolling your eyes while the other will be awwwwing your goddamn heart out. It’s a winning movie, no doubt, and one that I’d recommend to anyone that has a soft spot for romantic comedies. It’s just that it’s a hard movie to love. But it’s an even harder movie not to love.

The biggest disappointment I have is with how much better Crazy, Stupid, Love could’ve been given the performances and the level of talent involved. You’ve got an Oscar caliber actor in Gosling; the incredibly likable and cute Emma Stone; the winsome Steve Carell, who has occasionally displayed a knack for dramatic performances; and Julianne Moore, who, well, she cries really well. Each of them crush every scene they’re in, but it would’ve been nice if they’d been given better scenes with which to work. Indeed, if Crazy Stupid, Love had been able to shed all its Hollywood obligations and the silly subplots, there’s a really sweet and warm love story buried beneath the contrivances. It’s still a good summer movie, but if it hadn’t tried so hard to be a crowd-pleaser, it could’ve been a great Oscar-season movie.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



It's My Duty. I'm a Missionary: Hollywood's Worst Man-'do Mistakes | Cowboys & Aliens Review | It's All the Same, Only the Names Will Change









Comments

Automatic disqualification for this juxtaposition:

Julianne Moore + comedy

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at July 29, 2011 1:39 PM

Mrs. Julien
Automatic disqualification for this juxtaposition:

Julianne Moore + comedy

So you're saying you don't like The Big Lebowski?

Posted by: cockroach at July 29, 2011 1:48 PM

I'm glad to hear that this movie is at least watchable. But then again, Baby Goose can do no wrong in my eyes.

Posted by: Pat at July 29, 2011 1:52 PM

It's the exception that proves the rule.

Everytime I read your name Cockroach, I hear it in the voice of the Muppet creature playing "Who Am I" in the Muppet Christmas Carol and it gives me joy.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at July 29, 2011 1:52 PM

I'm having trouble with your assertion that Steve Carrel isn't a good-looking guy.

He has perfectly regular features, a proportional body, good skin, nice hair, great eyes... All of the ingredients are there. I wouldn't say he's GORGEOUS, but yeah, he's always been a handsome man.

Then again, the appeal of Jason Momoa is completely lost on me. He's decent-looking, but MY GOD, does he strike me as a cheesy lunkhead. So maybe my barometer for male attractiveness is off.

Posted by: SeaKat at July 29, 2011 2:07 PM

Well, as you know, I *do* have a soft spot for rom-coms, so I'm glad to hear that this one is worth watching.

Posted by: tamatha at July 29, 2011 2:54 PM

Most important, how was Analeigh, of America's Next Top Model fame, in her first named role? Tyra actually told her she should go into acting, so I'm curious if that crazy-ass bitch was actually right about something for a change.

(Oh, that's where she's from? She was OK. A little too model-y for a 17-year-old babysitter; she had a couple of really cute scenes, though. -- DR)

Posted by: baboocole at July 29, 2011 3:08 PM

Why all this hate for Julianne Moore? You can find nice things to say about Steve Carell but not Moore?! I hate you. And more than I hate Steve Carell.

Posted by: budski at July 29, 2011 3:10 PM

It's the exception that proves the rule.

I never would've expected you of all people to use that fakakta phrase, Mrs. Julien.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at July 29, 2011 3:14 PM

Dustin, this movie won me over with the trailer so there was nothing that was going to get in the way of my heading to theaters to see it but its nice to know that mt schmoopy, rom-com lovin self will at least gave a good time of it.

As hot as the Gosling looks (photoshopped abs or not, DAYUM) the only thing that does worry me is that Gosling spends the whole movie looking as oompa loompa ish as he does in the trailer. I mean I know nothing screams playa douche like an extreme tan and it's all for the character but, yuck.

Posted by: smijca at July 29, 2011 3:26 PM

Agreed, SeaKat. I've always found Carell attractive.

Posted by: anon33 at July 29, 2011 3:31 PM

I went and saw it this morning because going to the movies sounded WAY better than going to work.

And the movie was better than it had a right to be. Carrell and Gosling killed it, and Emma Stone is always delightful. Her scenes with Gosling were charming and adorable but not in a stupid way.

Also? Thank you for the Analeigh Tiption tidbit. It was bugging me most of the movie that I recognized her from somewhere. Now I can rest easy.

Posted by: MyySharona at July 29, 2011 3:46 PM

I'm willing to go along with everything you say here (despite your horrific record on rom coms) EXCEPT the claim that I will believe Steve Carrell is a genuinely good-looking man. NOPE.

Posted by: PaddyDog at July 29, 2011 3:50 PM

INRE: Julianne Moore + Comedy

Her anecdote on Letterman involving KFC and the L.I.E. was quite amusing. Maybe she should look for scripts that don't require her crying.

Posted by: JrFanBoy at July 29, 2011 4:24 PM

I am deeply shamed MelBivDevoe.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at July 29, 2011 4:30 PM

I also think Steve Carell is a good looking guy. And why the Pajiba group-think concerning Moore? How do some of you determine who's on the latest list of actors that it's "cool" to hate on? Or vice versa... deciding some odd looking man such as Matt Smith or Benedict Cumberpatch is the sexiest, most desirable man in the universe.

It's odd and frankly rather herd-like.

Posted by: snapnhiss at July 29, 2011 4:53 PM

So she cheats on Steve Carrell and we are treated to a movie about him trying to win her back?

How refreshing. I want a romantic comedy to end where she takes him back and then catches him sleeping with her sister in her bed. "Payback is a bitch." CREDITS.

Also, I want to order a "desert" at a restaurant.

Posted by: maka at July 29, 2011 4:56 PM


a weird review. ..seems that we judge the film by the actors. i
like romcoms as a genre and agree that the chemistry between the leads is a crucial element and the cast has a key role in how the
film is judged. i thought that the goodwin/krasinski tandem in
" something borrowed " was as good as anything here yet that movie
was smashed by the critics including pajiba. as a matter of fact,
your favorite punching bag, " 27 dresses " had a decent matchup
with heigl/marsden but it seems cool to trash her just as it seems
cool to salivate over steve carrell who is excellent. the commenter above mentioned a herd mentality. check it out the
next time you review a romcom.

Posted by: snake at July 29, 2011 6:10 PM

Thank you Mrs Julien...I can't get the Muppet Christmas Carol song out of my head now!

Posted by: TheEmpress at July 29, 2011 6:45 PM

The presence of Bacon sells it for me, I'll be netflixing it as soon as it hits the stream.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at July 29, 2011 9:24 PM

commenting on this thread is going to out me as having seen TWO romantic comedies just this week and then rushing home to see what Pajiba had to say about them but, eff it. It did happen. There is a scene at the bar need the end (no spoilers) between Carrell and Gosling that pretty much destroyed me and I distinctly thought "in less capable hands this scene would be cringe-worthy and here I am sobbing." Total testament to how truly good both those guys are. Same goes for Emma Stone-that girl is so hot but so smart and so talented. Plus whatever, apparently all the screen writers in Hollywood have been listening to a lot of Footloose era Kenny Loggins because there is much talk about "anything worth my love is worth the fight" but here it worked.

Posted by: replikate at July 30, 2011 1:56 AM

Carell's nostrils are gigantic.

Posted by: lawnjart at July 30, 2011 10:38 AM

Note to potential parents: If you're going to name your child some stupidly-spelled variation of Anna Lee, keep both "n"s.

Posted by: Todd at July 30, 2011 1:20 PM

Posted by: Darcy at July 30, 2011 2:26 PM

The thing that is weird to me is that Ryan Gosling is attractive? I've always thought he looked like Peter Stormare ("I'm hungry now ya know" and "pancakes house" from Fargo). Goofy looking and a little psychotic looking.

But yeah, with great abs.

Posted by: MRod at July 30, 2011 9:52 PM

That Cracked article is a joke or fever dream, because adult humans who are reasonably lucid could never write that Mussolini piece. If it was sincere, it wouldn't as stupid as 'How To Spot A Quadroon', but it wouldn't be the most edifying thing I've read either.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at July 30, 2011 10:12 PM

False. This movie is really good, whether or not I've been jaded by the rest of the schlock offered up this summer.

I'd say that the chemistry amongst the cast is reason enough alone to see the movie. I almost enter every movie with Steve Carrell in it expecting to hate him, but he consistently proves me wrong-- especially in this movie.

Posted by: Dr. Turkelton at July 31, 2011 7:56 PM

Ps. You gave a better review of insidious (which is TERRIBLE in my opinion and am clearly still bitter about) than this.

How and why?

Posted by: Dr. Turketon at July 31, 2011 8:01 PM

Saw this and liked it a lot. Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone had such an easy, believable chemistry, and Carrell was great as always.

I started to cringe every time the son and babysitter were onscreen though. Their storylines were just uncomfortable and not very funny or moving.

Posted by: Mel C. at August 1, 2011 9:49 AM

Someone should mention how deliciously asshole-ish Josh Groban was. (That someone would be me.) J'adore!

Posted by: Donut Plains at August 1, 2011 11:02 AM


can't understand the love for this flick. there isn't a single
relationship that a viewer can get invested in. the kid and
babysitter is ridiculous, the babysitter and carrell goes nowhere
so why even introduce it. the carrell/moore marriage is a boring
matchup and it's hard to root for either one let alone both.

finally, gosling is one of the finest contemporary actors with a
limitless future but noone could salvage the script he was given.
we see his shoes and confident manner so we know he is a real
stud but we only hear him say " let's get outta here " to a
succession of females who are far too good looking to be out
trolling in a singles bar. neither the script nor the director
develops his character. they simply ask you to connect the dots.
emma stone is always on her game but she also suffers from a
throwaway role.

" friends with benefits " is far superior. at least the leads get to
establish a relationship on screen with sharp, witty dialogue.

one plus for gosling is that he shows enough to establish his
versatility and give evidence that , given an intelligent script,
he can handle a comedic role. speaking of versatility, when is steve carrell going to emerge from the poor soul roles that
appear to be his fate.

Posted by: snake at August 3, 2011 1:54 AM

Went to see this last night and enjoyed the hell out of it. It meanders a little in the middle (and I agree, the subplot with the kids gets...well...silly) but pulls together nicely. And while the big connect the dots conflict near the end SHOULD have been ridiculous in the bad way, instead it was a scene I enjoyed the hell out of. I just found everyone so likeable in this movie. It really did a nice job.

Posted by: KatSings at August 4, 2011 8:28 AM

I just saw this and thought it was really cute! It felt a bit long in the middle, and the little kid was kind of annoying, but it was definitely cute. Some really funny scenes, and Carrell and Gosling were fantastic together. They actually had far, far more chemistry together than Carrell and Moore, which kinda dampened things down a bit for me. Moore just needs to stop having that permanent "I'm about to stop sobbing" face and try to have some fun for once. I wish she and Marissa Tomei had changed places in the casting.

Posted by: Figgy at August 5, 2011 12:15 AM