406_1219926167.jpg
Statham Drops the Hammer. There's Blood on the Pavement.


Crank: High Voltage / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | April 17, 2009 | Comments (58)


Sensitive readers: Step off. I’m about to unleash some Id in here. Ladies: Strap on your fuck-me boots again. Fellas: Are you ready to get your cinematic junk wet? Crank: High Voltage is a dirty, little backseat hate-fuck of a movie, one that will leave you writhing and raw and ready to jump back on. Want to know what the experience is like? Put your hang-low in a power socket. Get it stanky. You like how that feels? Welcome to Crank: High Voltage. If Sigmund Freud were still around to see it, he’d leave the theater, walk straight home, and fuck his mother. Twice.

When I heard that Neveldine/Taylor was doing a sequel to Crank, my first thought was: What the hopping fuck? He fell out of a helicopter at the end of the first movie. How could they plausibly bring Chev Chelios back to life? The answer? There is no plausible way. In fact, implausibility is the Crank franchise’s central motif. And thank the Good Lord and Savior for it. High Voltage, like its predecessor, is an hour-and-a-half of hyper-fueled, frenetic preposterousness. It is dumb so massive and full-circle that it runs the bases, trots back out to left field, and boomerangs so violently that it will rip out your cerebral cortex and fuck you with it. And you will ask for more even while you’re spitting up blood.

And what of the plot? Who gives a rat’s ass? Here’s what you need to know: Jason Statham is in it. He runs spectacularly fast, grunts, kicks the shit out of people, and screws Amy Smart in ways you didn’t even think were imaginable. On a horse track. During a horse race. In the opening minutes of Crank: High Voltage, Statham dips a shotgun into a bucket of oil and shoves it barrel-deep into a fat man’s ass. Indeed, there are enough breasts, bullets, and butts in High Voltage to supply a week’s worth of Feebles hijacked “Sesame Street” episodes on the glory of the Letter B. And nothing in Crank 2 makes sense. You will walk out of the theater seven times dumber than when you walked in. And you’ll be thankful for it.

High Voltage picks up where Crank left off. Statham is Chev Chelios. He fell from a helicopter, bounced off a car, and landed on the pavement. Still alive, if barely. Given how well he demonstrated the strength of his heart in the first Crank, an old dude’s (David Carradine) henchmen decides to scrape him off the street, pull out his heart for transplanting and replace it with an artificial one (while Chelios is still awake), and use the rest of his organs for spare parts. Chelios wakes up three months later, before they can remove his tiny Statham, and wreaks massive hell in an effort to track down the whereabouts of his heart, which he needs to replace the artificial one that’s running on a weak, portable battery. To keep himself alive, Chelios has to keep electricity pumping to his heart, which he does by jumper-cabling himself, sticking his finger in a cigarette lighter socket, rubbing up against an elderly lady, and whatever other degenerate act it takes. He’s assisted in his quest by his debauched, ass-slapping doctor (Dwight Yoakum), a prostitute (Bai Ling) that thinks that Chelios is his Kevin Costner to her Whitney Houston, and even Kaylo’s twin brother, Venus (Efren Ramirez), who has full-body Tourettes, which means he frequently breaks into Electric Boogaloo seizures for no apparent reason. It’s awesome.

There’s absolutely no pretension to High Voltage. It doesn’t want to be anything other than what it is: A series of shitballs retarded action sequences and strippers built around a nonexistent plot with a sole intention of trying to outdo the first Crank. And up until the last few minutes — when it just devolves into silly, sweat-dream weirdness — it at least matches the first installment. It is not a great movie, nor is it a movie that would appeal to anything other than your action-flick libido, but it fun. It’s moral depravity at its best. And it kicks sweet, sweet ass.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. You can email him or leave a comment below.


Week in Review 04/18/09 | State of Play Review





Comments

Yes, please.

Posted by: annoyingmouse at April 17, 2009 3:03 PM

If Sigmund Freud we’re still around to see it, he’d leave the theater, walk straight home, and fuck his mother. Twice.

HA HA HA HA HA!!

Posted by: Julie at April 17, 2009 3:06 PM

SUPER TURKISH!

Posted by: Hurp Durp at April 17, 2009 3:08 PM

There is a plot? What is that doing in there?

Posted by: Melody at April 17, 2009 3:10 PM

Sweet Jesus fucking Mary YES!!!! When I saw the preview for this, I knew all my dreams had come true. I realized the franchise had completely gone around the bend and balls to the wall. No plot, nothing makes sense and I LOVE IT. I remember the night after watching the first time with my SO. Now THAT was a night to remember. Statham, you truly are a god. Also, I think "tiny Statham" must be some kind of typing mistake. There is nothing tiny about that man.

Posted by: VentureSister at April 17, 2009 3:17 PM

Is it weird that I'm turned on right now?

Posted by: TK at April 17, 2009 3:20 PM

Not at all TK, we already knew you swooned over Corey Haim.

Posted by: Julie at April 17, 2009 3:22 PM

I can't believe I kind of want to see this movie now. Well done Dustin. The first paragraph of the review is particularly awesome. Of course, seeing Amy Smart look very nice on Craig Ferguson last night isn't hurting the cause.

Posted by: Dave at April 17, 2009 3:23 PM

I'm dizzy just from reading this. I'm in.

Posted by: dugs at April 17, 2009 3:24 PM

Well this just sounds implausible.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at April 17, 2009 3:26 PM

TK, it's the mullet isn't it?

Posted by: Melody at April 17, 2009 3:30 PM

Hands down one of the best reviews I have EVER read and now I need to go change my pants. HOLY SHIT.

To keep himself alive, Chelios has to keep electricity pumping to his heart, which he does by jumper-cabling himself, sticking his finger in a cigarette lighter socket, rubbing up against an elderly lady, and whatever other degenerate act it takes.

Wow. WOW. WOW.

Posted by: figgy at April 17, 2009 3:34 PM

Now I just want to see the episode of Meet the Feebles with their very special guest star...Jason Statham Yaaaaaaaayyyy!!!

Posted by: Adam C at April 17, 2009 3:37 PM

Oh god. Meet the Feebles. Hippo nipples. Excuse me while I sob under my desk.

Posted by: Julie at April 17, 2009 3:41 PM

Dustin, I'm glad you and I are on the same page re: Crank. I was afraid I'd have to sift through a bunch of reviews bitching about how the movie doesn't have a plot and is full of debauchery, all while avoiding the only question I want answered: "Is it awesome?"

You, sir, have answered that question.

Posted by: Macafee at April 17, 2009 3:44 PM

I will drag my husband to see this movie, he'll roll his eyes and complain under his breath but he will go. The dirty, naughty things I'll do to him afterwards makes sitting through a movie this spectacularly stupid worth it.

My husband pretends to hate Statham movies but in actuality, he loves them.

Because the Statham makes me behave in a manner that my mother would not approve of.

Posted by: Kelly at April 17, 2009 3:45 PM

It is the mullet.

Wait... what?

Posted by: TK at April 17, 2009 3:45 PM

Ooh, boy. I think we're gonna need an intervention here.

Posted by: figgy at April 17, 2009 3:59 PM

There is no level of awesome high enough to describe CRANK.

Maybe it should just be CRANK! It will be used to describe anything that is undescribable.

"Dude, that Bob Segar concert was CRANK!"
"Wow, that sex that we had for the very first time was CRANK!"
"Man, Crank: High Voltage was CRANK!"

Posted by: annoyingmouse at April 17, 2009 3:59 PM

"Crank High Voltage is a dirty, little backseat hate-fuck of a movie, one that will leave you writhing and raw and ready to jump back on"

I'll take two.

Posted by: Mick J at April 17, 2009 4:11 PM

It bored me. Sorry.

Posted by: Clee Shay at April 17, 2009 4:21 PM

I am experiencing a tightening of the upper-pantle region. It is not unpleasant.

I also have an inappropriately graphic sexual comment that I want to make, but, I'm turning over a new leaf and attempting to appear more dignified.

Posted by: admin at April 17, 2009 4:30 PM

It shocked me to my fucking core.

Posted by: PigsinSpace at April 17, 2009 4:31 PM

Dustin, you must be really excited, because this review is riddled with typos and they're making me want to punch you in your own hang-low.

Why you gotta fuck with me on a rainy day? I made muffins, man. MUFFINS.

Posted by: Sharon at April 17, 2009 4:46 PM

I also have an inappropriately graphic sexual comment that I want to make, but, I'm turning over a new leaf and attempting to appear more dignified.

AAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA
*GASP*
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Whee! Tell me another one.

Posted by: figgy at April 17, 2009 4:50 PM

I have the feeling that this movie will leave me all sweaty with my clothes on backward and inside-out. And then it won't call me later. But I'll be there just the same.

Posted by: greer at April 17, 2009 4:53 PM

I.AM.THERE.

So, it kinda surprised me that "Action" was the least-liked genre on the poll post. Just sayin'.

Posted by: MM at April 17, 2009 5:36 PM

I will try to do this politely:

I would let this movie to perform a certain four-letter sexual act to my esophagus until my tonsils were forced out of a certain oriface usually reserved for the expulsion of waste products. And I wouldn't care if it never called me again.

Posted by: admin at April 17, 2009 5:54 PM

'atta boy, admin.

Posted by: figgy at April 17, 2009 6:15 PM

Thanks, Dustin. Reading this made me feel less sick. I feel happy to be alive. All glory to The Stantham!

Posted by: George at April 17, 2009 6:28 PM

Y'mean "mouth raped 'til you piss your tonsils"?

Me too, man. Me too. Hell I didn't know what to think of the first "Crank" 'til I watched it on a whim, knowing Statham from the first "Transporter" movie. It is truly with "Crank" that my Statham worship bloomed from admiration to flat-out man crush.

I have since recommended it to all the friends I have that like action films...that is to say ALL of them...starting with my father who turned me on to Dirty Harry and James Bond movies before I was old enough to know anything else.

And all jokes and wordplay aside it's nice to know "Crank 2" is at LEAST as good as it's predecessor.

That's all I've got. Can't wait. GO TEAM STATHAM!

Posted by: Green Lantern at April 17, 2009 6:45 PM

This movie will make men pregnant -- and I'm not just talking about guys who were once chick either.

Posted by: Fredo at April 17, 2009 6:53 PM

I'm ready to start breastfeed.

Posted by: Fredo at April 17, 2009 6:56 PM

"Guess" is right.

Come on Dustin, bring him back. This site is way to white without "you-know- who" to balance things out. And if you ban him, it would only be fair of you to ban me for that Observe and Report thread.

Posted by: George at April 17, 2009 7:41 PM

Nice try there, spambot. You can't out-do Dustin's awesome review.

I've got a few useless extra brain cells hanging around. This movie is the remedy. Must. see.

Posted by: stardust savant at April 17, 2009 7:43 PM

Hey George, I'm Black! I don't count because I don't comment much? ;-) I won an "Eloquent"... got the Murdertank tee to prove it. But I took that shit and ran, dude. Gotta go out on a high note and all.

We Negroes are here, but we mostly like to watch the White people get all frothy... good times.

Posted by: ceejeemcbeegee at April 17, 2009 8:04 PM

Oh hell YES.

Posted by: Snath at April 17, 2009 8:39 PM

figs, getting a little out of control here, are we?

Good.

Saw the trailer in a theater and it's possibly the first numbskulled/boneheadedly stupid movie I've wanted to see in ... ever?

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at April 18, 2009 1:03 AM

It's the power of Statham!

Posted by: figgy at April 18, 2009 2:16 AM

I am too excited about this movie, to the point that I actually feel sorry for the poor sods that'll be sat in my vicinity at the cinema. Wellies and ear-plugs will be an essential requirement.

Posted by: Lisa S at April 18, 2009 6:11 AM


I get it. I understand that this site isn't afraid of the popular, that it has no hipster pretension. But does that have to mean that we have no taste? Must the blue ribbon always go to the movie that soothes the white id? Where whiteness is recast in more manly terms? When we cheer for the Statham, as he plows Amy Smart around the world, in broad daylight, and in front of thousands, are we really cheering for a return of the White Man in primitive form? We aren't applauding the acting here, nor the casting, the set design, the cinematography, the directing, etc.; only Statham's embodiment of a rejuvenated white id? If, instead of watching the movie, Freud were to read this thread, he be thinking that a bunch of us have issues, specifically that we feel our manhood is under assault, and that only a ritual and spectacular fucking of some blond in front of the globe can redeem us. Get over it boys.

Posted by: Lance at April 18, 2009 6:20 AM

Lance,

I'm sorry, but sometimes a man OR a woman wants to go to a movie to be entertained. Thousands of years of evolution has shaped us to like pretty people, violence, shiny things, and explosions--and i'm pretty goddamn sure that's not a "white thing". While I understand that people like Wes Anderson movies, and i think they have a time and a place, why the hell shouldn't you be able to give your id a little playground time?

If you lock mr. id away, you are either delusional (as everyone has one and everyone has guilty pleasures) or just plain stupid. Statham is the taco of acting. A taco is not appropriate for breakfast, it certainly won't impress the ladies on a date, but oh man, when you've just done a 10 hour work day reading spreadsheets and you haven't had sex in a week, a taco sounds perfect, regardless of who you are. Even hippies can eat a fish taco or an organically raised, free trade, vegan mixture of beans taco and get the mind-blowing release that they deserve (assuming the hippie, cough, worked). Perhaps statham isn't your flavor of taco and angelina jolie IS, but i sincerely believe there is a taco for you lance, a delicious one waiting out there for you to give it a chance.

Posted by: "luker" the barbarian at April 18, 2009 10:05 AM

Now I'm hungry.

Posted by: jM at April 18, 2009 10:51 AM

Lance appreciates the Muppets on a much deeper level than you.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at April 18, 2009 11:22 AM

Holy Cow--now I really want a taco. Stupid wisdom tooth extraction...

Posted by: brenia at April 18, 2009 11:37 AM

Lance, I have to agree with Luker. It's about entertainment. Watching a "little backseat hate-fuck of a movie" does not stoke the "white Id", but just the Id. Yes, it speaks to a primal urge in us.The majority of us (that is a disclaimer, I would hope everyone), however, possess enough presence of mind to control our primal urges or appease them in an acceptable manor.

Will I see Crank 2? Yes. Will I enjoy it? You bet! Will I be left "writhing and raw and ready to jump back on. I sincerely hope so! Will this initiate the fall of Modern Civilization? Not likely. Loosen up a bit Lance, you might find you like it.

Posted by: Eyvi at April 18, 2009 12:35 PM

"luker" the barbarian, nice comment. I'm glad you stuck with the handle and made it your own.

I also like to play violent video games, Lance. Sometimes, just for the sheer joy of blowing shit up. I'm such a fucking caveman.

Posted by: admin at April 18, 2009 1:44 PM

Lance... Did you just read Fight Club? C'mon, you can admit it. I know it's really deep. There's no shame in admitting to it.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at April 18, 2009 2:58 PM


I agree. "It" - this site, or our love of movies, whatever - is about entertainment. So how the fuck to you propose to assess *that*? I mean, are all tacos the same? If you say yes, then you're a moron. Or your ill-informed. So then, if you say no, and if this piece of shit film is another taco, is it a good one or a bad one? And why? I'm all for mind candy, and all about the popular, but that doesn't mean I don't have a greater appreciation for mind candy that tastes good (i.e., has something going on that I can measure, judge comparatively). We can love the popular, friends, but also want more from it than a bad taco, which brings the shits, not enlightenment, not real pleasure, nor even some sort of primal satisfaction.

So everyone loves "the Statham." What the f that is about? What does it do for you? For us? Do you know anyone who takes "it" seriously who wouldn't ask that question? Are all we all trolling for comment of the week, here.

And please, don't assume that I watched Fight Club and got all into its politics. I have miles, brothers and sisters. But as cheap tacos go, at least FC didn't leave me clutching my bleeding ass, dehydrated, and fumbling with the imodium.

Posted by: Lance at April 18, 2009 5:39 PM

Sooo... If I haven't seen Crank would I be able to follow this one?

Posted by: Kayanne at April 18, 2009 6:33 PM

I just saw the movie Saturday afternoon and movie had me howling with joyful laughter from start to finish to ending credits with the outakes. It was a wonderful way to spend an afternoon. I am hoping the movie going public can take the rods out of their as_es and go and see this wonderful movie with absolutely no social redeeming value except that it is fun, fun, fun.

Posted by: Mr.Cee at April 18, 2009 7:48 PM

you know why statham could never EVER rape me?

Posted by: gp at April 18, 2009 11:08 PM

well, it ain't because i can run faster.

Posted by: gp at April 19, 2009 12:13 PM

I got the feeling that a shirtless Statham was the bait they gave you for this review, dustin.

Posted by: james at April 19, 2009 9:21 PM

Saw it at the 12AM premiere... Jaw left on floor in theater. Went back to theater the following Saturday to retrieve jaw, saw film for a second time with 3 people. 4 peoples jaws left on theater floor... we're going back this Monday the 20th, bringing more friends to drop more jaws, repeat ad nauseum. Best-movie-ever. FUCK the other reviews. 10/10 flick. Will SURPASS Fight Club status years later, count on it. -EK

Posted by: ExPunkStar at April 20, 2009 3:47 AM

So everyone loves "the Statham." What the f that is about? What does it do for you?

It makes me want to fuck all night. So does watching Angelina Jolie shoot people, watching James Bond kick the crap out of some guy, watching Wolverine get all snarly and slice shit open -- hell, even Vin Diesel can bring it (if not lately). Stylized violence turns me on. If I want a thinky movie, I know where to find one. But life isn't all Remains of the Day, nor should it be.

Posted by: Reba at April 20, 2009 10:20 AM

What Reba said.

Posted by: Sweetie Dahling at April 20, 2009 12:16 PM

This movie is a fucking scream! and fucking Maynard James Keenan is in it!

Posted by: david at April 22, 2009 5:08 PM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.