web
counter
 

He's Still Chasing Amy... So to Speak

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (45)



cop-outdad.jpg

Kevin Smith has fallen victim to what a lot of us occasionally fall victim to: insecurity. He’s been making movies for 15 years, and despite critical and cult success, Smith has never broken the $30 million ceiling. He’s a niche director. It didn’t matter how much of himself he put into a movie (see Chasing Amy), how much he amped up the ribald (see Zack and Miri Make a Porno) or how much he tried to inject heart into a film (see the misguided Jersey Girl), his movies couldn’t break that barrier.

I can sympathize with Smith’s frustration, and I think I understand why he decided to direct Cop Out. He looked at the script and he figured this is a Kevin Smith movie without a Kevin Smith sensibility. You can say whatever you want about Kevin Smith — and I know audiences are divided — but he’s not a dumb guy. He’s got a sophomoric sense of humor, but it’s balanced by slight sophistication, an understanding of human dynamics, and a touch of levity. He must have looked at Mark and Robb Cullen’s script and thought, “This is everything that I am not.” And then he thought, “If the movies I make can’t make more than $30 million, then it must be me.” So, he jumped at the chance to direct Cop Out because it meant the commercial success that’s always eluded him. Add Bruce Willis, and he’s guaranteed to make more than $30 million and find that box-office success he craves, right?

He’s still chasing Amy; it’s just that now Amy is mainstream success.

The jury’s still out, and my guess is that Bruce Willis doesn’t compensate for the deservedly terrible reviews that Cop Out has received and it bombs like no other Kevin Smith movie has, and Amy slips through his fat fingers again. Cop Out is an awful film, badly acted, atrociously scripted, and directed with Smith’s brand of mediocrity (people don’t love Smith for his directing capabilities; they love him for his scripts). Save for a few mildly amusing moments featuring Seann William Scott, Cop Out is completely irredeemable. Some may want to call it the worst movie of the year, and while I’d stop short of that (have you seen Leap Year?), it is the most disappointing, even if expectations are kept in check.

In it, Bruce Willis and Tracy Morgan play best friends and police partners (there’s never any conflict between them, which is something of a no no in buddy cop flicks). (For convenience sake, I’m going to refer to the characters by the actors’ names.) The plot is ridiculously simple: Willis and Morgan have been suspended from the force for a bad bust. Nevertheless, Willis needs $48,000 to pay for his daughter’s wedding (Michelle Trachtenberg) and save face by avoiding having her step-father (Jason Lee) pay for it. Willis has a rare $80,000 baseball card; he attempts to sell it; he’s robbed (by Seann William Scott’s character); and that baseball card finds its way into the hands of a Latino gang-leader. Willis and Morgan have to track it down, pay for the wedding, and save the day.

If there’s one thing that Cop Out has in common with other Kevin Smith movies, it’s that it’s not about the plot. It’s about the exchanges, here between Willis and Morgan’s characters. Unfortunately, the chemistry is flat, and the humor is non-existent. It’s a series of the sort of jokes you’d expect to hear in a Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer movie — dick and fart jokes without an ounce of subtext to them. At one point, Tracy Morgan goes on a four-minute ad-libbed diatribe about his bowel movements, which ranks as one of the most painful scenes I’ve ever had to suffer through.

Cop Out is meant to be a throwback to the old-school ’80s cop movies, but it only succeeds in replicating the shoddy production values and the cheesy synthesizer music (it says a lot about the movie that the bad synth is the best part of the film). The action scenes are poorly directed; Bruce Willis walks through the movie like he’s one of those out-of-touch Dads trying to be cool and hip; and Tracy Morgan’s non-sequitur humor is forced even for Tracy Morgan. It really is a movie that’s embarrassing for everyone involved.

Most, including myself, have been quick to call Cop Out Kevin Smith’s sell-out movie. And it is, in part. But I don’t think it was about selling out. I think it was about finding some mainstream acceptance, even if it meant compromising his integrity, and even if it meant damaging his Clerks reputation. I think that Smith thought that a $50 or $60 million box-office success would validate him as director, that it would relieve some of that insecurity he’s been carrying for a decade and a half. He made it for the same reason he made Jersey Girl — he thought if he could mimic a mainstream sensibility, he’d get some mainstream acceptance.

What I don’t think that Kevin Smith understands, however, is that there are five million people who adore the ever living shit out of his fat ass. We will tolerate the bad movies and the missteps, as long as Kevin Smith continues to be genuine and candid. And as long as he continues to remain true to himself. More than any other director working, Smith engages with his fans, even if he doesn’t listen to them. And in my opinion, having five million people adore you is a lot substantially better than having 15 million people willing to part with $10 for two hours of meaningless entertainment (something that Cop Out doesn’t deliver). Five million people can’t give Kevin Smith the box-office respect he wants, but we can provide him the support he needs to continue doing what he professes to love: making the kind of movies that he wants to watch.

Cop Out is not one of those movies, and in the months and years ahead, if Smith continues to be as genuine and candid as he has been in the past, he will own up to it, just as he owned up to Jersey Girl. His fans will forgive him. And he can go back to making the under-performing movies that we respect.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He is forced to run obnoxious ads in order to remain so. If you would like to point out a spelling, factual, or grammatical error, please have the courtesy to email him. Otherwise, comments are very welcome below.









The Secret of Kells Review | The Pajiba Book Club: Lolita













Comments

$48,000 for a wedding? You're kidding? The kids could buy two cars for that. They could put the downpayment on a nice house for that. $48,000 for a wedding? Elope. You're just as married if you elope. And then get all your friends to throw you a party at their expense.

Posted by: BWeaves at February 26, 2010 3:32 PM

Still says "Sean Michael Scott" in the fourth par. DAMMIT, ROWLES

Posted by: Arran at February 26, 2010 3:47 PM

I agree w/ Bweaves. My brother had the same idea. He built his house and built his daughters bedroom windows low to the ground so that they could elope when they decided they wanted to get married. (Reno is only a couple of hours away).

Unfortunately, it didn't quite work out that way.

But it sure as hell didn't run him 48k each!

Posted by: UncleJR at February 26, 2010 3:47 PM

Isn't it Seann William Scott? For a moment, I thought the guy from The Office was making a cameo.

Posted by: Brie at February 26, 2010 3:48 PM

Bad word of mouth on this movie has spread like a virus. I haven't found a single positive review.

This saddens me mightily, as I like Kevin Smith and thought he'd deliver a smart satire/homage of a stale movie formula. It's such a target-rich environment, and I can't understand how the hell he missed so badly.

Posted by: Jerce at February 26, 2010 3:52 PM

Well, the previews for this are painful to sit through so the review isn't surprising. Disappointing, but not surprising. The problem is Tracy Morgan, the guy is not an actor. He's a personality. He's funny in small doses, but giving him the movie to run with while Willis plays the straight man is just a bad idea.

Posted by: TylerDFC at February 26, 2010 4:00 PM

So basically, Kevin Smith one of the Tracy Jordan movies that they show us clips of on 30 Rock? But worse?

Posted by: Jeni at February 26, 2010 4:01 PM

Did anyone catch Tracy Morgan on The Daily Show the other night? Hilarious.

And yet this looks like Paul Blart without the box office money...

Posted by: D-Day at February 26, 2010 4:11 PM

"But I don’t think it was about selling out. I think it was about finding some mainstream acceptance, even if it meant compromising his integrity, and even if it meant damaging his Clerk’s reputation."

Isn't this kind of the definition of selling out? Compromising your integrity for commercial success?

Posted by: kyle at February 26, 2010 4:30 PM

'But I don’t think it was about selling out. I think it was about finding some mainstream acceptance, even if it meant compromising his integrity, and even if it meant damaging his Clerk’s reputation.'

But that's the very definition of selling out.

Posted by: Steph at February 26, 2010 4:38 PM

"So, he jumped at the chance to direct Cop Out because it meant the commercial success that’s always eluded him"

Why not just simplify the language and say he did it for the money?

Posted by: PaddyDog at February 26, 2010 4:39 PM

Balls

Posted by: Steph at February 26, 2010 4:42 PM

This makes me really sad, honestly, but I can't say it's surprising.

Honestly, Tracy Morgan has found that thing he does well, and now that's what he does. Which is FINE for a movie like this. But am I the only one who feels like Bruce Willis was HORRIBLY miscast?

Posted by: Smokin at February 26, 2010 4:47 PM

BWeaves, how many movies would Hollywood have to trash if their characters just did sensible things instead of having an extravagant, blow-all-your-savings wedding? I'm too lazy to list but there have got to be SO MANY movies that wouldn't exist if not for the ridiculous wedding plot cliche.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at February 26, 2010 5:02 PM

Wait, didn't Smith sell out when he tried to make a Judd Apatow movie right down to getting Seth Rogan to star? (Zak and Miri)

Or when he tried to counter the criticism that his films were visually uninteresting by hiring one of the best living cinematographers and still managed to push out a piece of crap? (Jersey Girl)

Or when he tried make an action comedy sequel to his original indie hit (Mallrats, Jay and Silent Bob, and Clerks 2)

Posted by: Dave at February 26, 2010 5:30 PM

Part of the problem is that people look at Tracy Morgan on "30 Rock" and think that someone who is hilarious in bits and pieces of an ensemble show would be just as entertaining in the lead role of a movie. Those people are WRONG. Something that is funny when confined to five minutes of dialogue just becomes painful when you try to stretch it out to 90 minutes of film. This is why most SNL movies bomb.

Posted by: Craig at February 26, 2010 5:35 PM

Why is Tracy Morgan dressed as a cell phone? I do NOT want to be the person who has to dial 555-0852.

Posted by: BWeaves at February 26, 2010 6:19 PM

If my daughter asks for $48K for a wedding, I'm going to spend about $48 to bolt a ladder to her window and be done with it.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at February 26, 2010 6:21 PM

Are parents still paying for their kid's weddings? I would expect a contribution (like pick up the bar tab or pay for flowers), but to expect your folks to pay that much seems bananos to me. My brother's wedding was $70K, but he and his wife paid for the whole shebang.

Posted by: malechai at February 26, 2010 6:45 PM

I realized that the thing about Kevin Smith is that his movies aren't the shit-to-end-all-shit, but I really want to kick it & get crunk with him. He probably has all the best toys, comics, weed, booze, & spare bedrooms, & I want to fucks with all of 'em.

Posted by: the new transported man at February 26, 2010 7:24 PM

Weddings are expensive, so depending on where you live and how many people are coming and what kind of standards you have for a proper banquet, it could REALLY run the tab up. The median for America is something like $35,000, which is of course driven up by extravagant weddings, so $48,000 still seems like kind of a lot for a cop's daughter. I dunno. Whatever.

I completely understand all of the costs that pile up though. To a point, anyway, because there's always that wedding premium and if I could figure out a way to book my upcoming reception while not telling them it's a reception (I considered calling it a banquet to see if I got cheaper rates, but I suspect they'd catch on when I ordered a cake and came in dressed in a ridiculously fabulous dress - my friend the seamstress's wedding gift - and the guests looked suspiciously like two families coming together, and then they'd just charge me extra anyway or something), I would.

But since my experience is in EVENT production, not wedding production, I'm used to making up all those completely understandable event costs by charging admission. So part of me kinda wants to charge admission to my reception in lieu of getting presents, and I probably would, except that I think only my friends would really "get" it while my parents and future in-laws would be mortified. I'd really much rather have an amazing party because everyone chipped in a little and had a great time than some household items that, yes, we'll need for our home together but can just get ourselves later.

And I've gone way off topic. Not unusual for me.

Posted by: Nat Kittyface at February 26, 2010 7:31 PM

I'm not sure I grasp Kevin Smith's line of thinking. So let's recap his career thus far.

For the most part he has been able to make the movies that he writes the way he wants to, and despite the fact they are not runaway financial mother lodes, he is given the opportunity to make more of them again and again. He has a loyal fanbase who in fact are the reason why most of his projects are at least profitable both in the theaters & home video. From what I've seen he is given respect among others in the industry, is called upon to voice his personal and professional opinions, lives comfortably and has even invested some of his monies in other businesses venues that assure him personal stability even if he were never to make another film. These are all things most filmmakers would do anything to gain and he has it.

That said, about the only logic I can fathom for him agreeing to take part in this production is for one reason and one reason only- Money. He wants to take in a bigger check than he has thus far. That's the only thing this movie would help him achieve that he doesn't already have (it certainly has no chance in Hell of winning him any awards). He wants the big enchilada payoff that inferior directors with better box office receipts have and he's willing to give up the "Kevin Smith Feeling" (if I may borrow from Barton Fink) to do so.

It is selling out in every sense of the term. There's no shame in wanting a big payout so long as you're honest with it. Not that I think it would ever happen, but if he stated after the movie left the theaters that he just did it for the money, I'd respect that more than some bullshit line about how good he thinks the movie is- especially if he knows otherwise.

Posted by: bleujayone at February 26, 2010 7:34 PM

Another director who had one good idea.

Posted by: , at February 26, 2010 7:56 PM

I for one, am NOT gonna fall for the all too predictable hipster routine. This review is a typical Pajiba assassination. This shit ALWAYS happens here when someone achieves a modicum of success. DEAL WITH IT.

I, will NOT be a party to this travesty.

Shame on you Rowles, how do you sleep with yourself?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 26, 2010 10:59 PM

Yeah, being knee-deep in wedding planning myself, I have to say $48k is sadly not that out of range with reality.

My fiance and I really didn't want a big wedding, so we decided to keep everything "really small" and "simple" and we're still not that far from that figure. Once your parents start inviting "people who will be insulted otherwise" and you get done setting up the place, the food, the booze and the music, you're just done financially.

If I could start over (and I suppose I still could, but we'd lose a lot of down payments), but if I could go back to myself 6 months ago when we started planning, I would shake myself and tell myself: Elope! The party won't be worth it!

Posted by: Lindsay at February 27, 2010 12:28 AM


previews are intended to entice moviegoers to part with some
coin when said movie is released. the preview for " cop out "
was so bad you could only guess at what they were thinking. and
they were the highlights.

hey, dustin, i know that you despised " leap year " and that it has
replaced " 27 dresses " as evil incarnate but do you really think
it was worse than " when in rome " and " valentine's day "?

Posted by: snake at February 27, 2010 1:31 AM

Lindsay, the venues pretty much rely on bar and food for all their profit on your event, so that's where they'll do their best to screw you, whether you're a wedding or a paid event like a concert. I was just informed by our reception venue that, unless I'm hearing them wrong (and I'm going to act like I did and see if they'll be uncomfortable enough to just go along with me because this is LUDICROUS), there's a $35/head charge for NOT USING THEIR DINNER SERVICE. What the FUCKING FUCK? I just saved you a shit-ton of kitchen staff pay and food costs and I have to pay you more than my entire outside vendor dinner will cost because I don't want YOUR dinner? It's madness. We too are planning a small wedding (which just jumped up by like 12 people because I made the mistake of telling my mom anything about the guest list, because out came that list of people who'll be insulted if we don't invite them...), and it would STILL come out to over $2,000 to NOT FEED MY GUESTS the venue's food. My mind, it cannot wrap around this concept, so I can only hope I heard it wrong or the lady didn't understand me correctly or something.

As for bar, you're honestly better off just buying the liquor yourself wholesale by the case if your venue will allow it. It ends up being way cheaper and you're not wasting money on booze nobody's gonna drink. It's the venues' policies on outside food and beverage, intended to discourage this kind of practicality, that will frequently prevent you from doing stuff like that and, you know, spending a REASONABLE amount of money.

Posted by: Nat Kittyface at February 27, 2010 2:23 AM

Just as an FYI, Kevin made less money on this movie than he did on Dogma. Everyone took paycuts to get the movie an R rating. So "he did it for the money" doesn't really fit.

Posted by: Arran at February 27, 2010 3:25 AM

My issue with this review is how you assume every reason why he made this movie. Why make all these excuses for his shitty directing.

There is only one reason he made it : He needed a job.

The guy is a terrible, terrible director.

Posted by: Horace H. Kempster at February 27, 2010 4:21 AM

My advice to anyone in the expensive wedding industry -- get out as soon as you can find something else. We're going through a long-term, fundamental change in our economic culture, and one of the first casualties will be lavish (or, if not lavish, then lavishly priced, as Lindsey and Nat are describing) ceremonies for ordinary people. And the industry that's grown up around "making sure everything is perfect" will become an anachronism.

At least, that's what I hope happens. Can't you tell?

Posted by: sansho1 at February 27, 2010 7:58 AM

Arran-

It's called "performance percentage". And yeah, it really means you do it for the money. You give up some of you salary now and in return you are wagering that you'll more than make up for it later. Essentially, you become a producer & investor on the film. Your payout is then a percentage of the box office receipts rather than a straight fee. James Cameron operates like this all the time, which is why his last two studio films have made him richer than God.

Willis, Morgan and producer Marc Platt all did this as well as Smith. I can assure you they did not take a pay cut because they were feeling charitable. They did so because they felt the movie in anything less than an "R" rated format would not be successful. Nobody wants a bomb on their record because it usually affects both payouts and offer quality of future jobs. Their options were to take their straight fee and leave it at that convinced the movie would tank or put up the money themselves for the changes and get less money up front, but potentially get even more in return later if the altered movie was successful. It's a gamble that happens more often in movie making than people realize and like any gambling it doesn't always yield success.


Posted by: bleujayone at February 27, 2010 10:55 AM

Kevin Smith is at best a below average film director with a cult following. Though I love Tracy Morgan but by having Morgan is his movie Smith signifies that he is fresh out of ideas. Sad that a director this is only in his thirties is already at a crossroad in his career. Let us hope and pray that Smith’s fast descent into total obscurity is both painless and educational. And the small fortune he amassed along the way will soften his landing.

Posted by: Orrin Hatch at February 27, 2010 1:00 PM

I chose my reception location specifically because it was a winery, so the wine was wholesale. And they still screwed me over on the price. They came up to my dad right after the father/daughter dance and demanded that he pay the tab at that time, because the manager was leaving. They had given us a list in writing of what the reception would cost, but the bill was $1k more than what we had been told, because apparently it hadn't included tax and service? Of course, since we didn't bring the list with us to our wedding, we had no proof. I'm sure I did things wrong, but I had no idea I was supposed to bring all the paperwork with me to the wedding (or that we would be expected to pay the balance that night- all our other vendors sent us bills.)

Posted by: Phaeolus at February 27, 2010 2:10 PM

A) $48K for a wedding? Absolutely ridiculous.

We "eloped," if you want to call it that. That is, we went to Las Vegas and got married. Oddly, the marriage was still legal. And we didn't go into fucking DEBT right off the fucking bat.

FORTY EIGHT THOUSAND DOLLARS FOR A FUCKING PARTY???

B)Ditto everyone else who has pointed out that you said he wasn't selling out and then pretty much defined selling out as you said what he WAS doing.

C) Dear fucking god, when will Tracy Morgan's career die, already?

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at February 27, 2010 2:14 PM

I had the unfortunate opportunity to sit through this movie.
The best part occured when Morgan was 'acting' out various lines from movies.
"Yippiekay YAY MotherF**ker!"
Willis says-straight faced- "I haven't seen that one, I dunno."

And then when Sean William Scott is talking to his jailmate, who confesses to knitting.
The score was awful, the casting was poor, the alternate cop duo was painful to watch. The plot was jello-y. Yuck.

Posted by: Kelly at February 27, 2010 7:20 PM

Well, I haven't seen the movie, though I did honestly find the trailers funny. I agree with most of what you said about Kevin Smith selling out, but selling out doesn't necessarily make a movie bad.
It seems to me that you guys are bitter that he sold out, so you're being a lot harder on this movie than you should be. I think you guys decided not to like it as soon as you heard of it. You are completely determined to hate this movie. (I think BarbadoSlim said the same thing with about 75% less words, hehe.)
I do find it a little strange that Smith directed this movie. As someone else said, he's always been known for his writing, not his directing. Why direct a movie that's similar to what you're well-known for writing, but that was written by someone else?

Posted by: Corntree at February 28, 2010 8:51 PM

Oh, I did find the Chasing Amy metaphor very apt. Glad you used that.

Posted by: Corntree at February 28, 2010 8:52 PM

Seeking the successful singles and take care of you - perhaps financially? http://euageless.com/ celebrates age gap dating and romance.

Posted by: Jim at February 28, 2010 9:39 PM

Oh, for the love of god.

Dustin, the fact is, he sold out, and he did it in such an obvious way that it's embarassing. When someone's stupid enough to make a ton of money, they do it naturally, and it's a fairly entertaining experience. (Exhibit A, James Cameron) But when it's this obvious, it's just painful.

Posted by: George at February 28, 2010 11:58 PM

I agree with this whole article. I love Kevin Smith, I can't help it.

Posted by: Mebe at March 1, 2010 3:28 AM

Kevin Smith=meh.

Weddings=too expensive. We had a 10am wedding and followed it up with a very casual reception with finger foods and punch. It was in a Baptist church so drinking and dancing were not an option anyway. We even had pigs-in-a-blanket. Not sophisticated fare, but I didn't care. It still cost way too much money.

Posted by: lainiefig at March 1, 2010 9:08 AM

I thought this movie was funny as hell. 8/10

Watching it stoned may have helped I dunno.

Posted by: kada at September 3, 2010 11:26 PM

I thought it was going to be some boring old post, but it really compensated for my time. I will post a link to this page on my blog. I am sure my visitors will find that very useful.I think you have done an excellent job with your blog. I will return in the near future.I had bookmark it :)

Posted by: wholesale fashion dresses at January 5, 2011 9:57 PM

The article truly worth reading. I discovered it again well crafted as well as conveniently acceptable. I want to i think many thanks for an hour or two you spent to write it again. We're extremely pleased not to mention look forward to coming blog post.

Posted by: Raguel Kereluk at January 7, 2011 4:39 PM

Hello, just wanted to let you kow how much of an interesting read this was. Look forward to the next installment.

Posted by: where does justin bieber live at March 5, 2011 5:51 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time