free counter with statistics Cirque du Freak Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

va_upload.jpg
It Ain't Harry Potter


Cirque du Freak: The Vampire's Assistant / Steven Lloyd Wilson

Film Reviews | October 26, 2009 | Comments (37)


You know what I love? I love people who watch lots of horror movies and read horror books. Because they believe what they read and hear, and come packing silly things like crosses and holy water, instead of weapons which could do some damage, like guns and hand grenades. -Mr. Crepsley (from the book, sadly, not the film)

Cirque du Freak: The Vampire’s Assistant painfully exemplifies the trickiest part of making a PG-13 film. It is a movie plagued by not knowing what it wants to be, a schizophrenia extending all the way into its title. “Cirque du Freak” is intriguing, dark, and funny, teetering on the edge of R. “The Vampire’s Assistant” is boring, trite and mediocre, teetering on the edge of PG. The latter is not improved by its combination with the former, constantly conspiring to bring the entire film down to its level.

The basic set up is that Crepsley (John C. Reilly) is an old vampire who is discovered by a pair of teenage boys. One thing leads to another and they become vampires (this is all on the movie poster so it’s not spoilery). Destiny says the same vague crap it always does: chosen ones, yada yada, so it is written, prophecied, so on and so on. The gist of the story’s conflict is that there are two warring sides amongst vampires: those who drain and kill their victims, and those who merely take a furtive taste while leaving their victims alive. Otherwise known in technical terms as “evil” and “good.”

There is a hell of a decent cast assembled here, slumming it in oddball minor roles hoping that this has a $50 million weekend and turns into the next Harry Potter cash cow for half a dozen films. Salma Hayek, Willem Dafoe, Orlando Jones, Jane Krakowski, Ken Watanabe, Kristen Schaal, Ray Stevenson. John C. Reilly is surprising, holding up a role that never regresses into the poor man’s Will Ferrell that he’s made his bread and butter over the last few years. He portrays a genuinely fascinating character: a dark, witty, reluctantly honorable, tragic figure who just wants to be done with the fighting and fade off into obscurity. Brooding vampires are a cliché, but Reilly never really broods, managing to endow Crepsley with a genuinely tired sadness that is rarely seen. Reilly’s scenes are simply captivating, and from the moment he appears on screen, you want to know more about this character. His interactions with Hayek, Dafoe, and even his assistant hint at a deep and fascinating character who commands the respect of everyone who knows him, even his enemies.

It’s too bad that he’s not the main character.

Instead the film’s narrative focus is on Crepsley’s assistant, Darren Shan, played by Chris Massoglia. Massoglia is unable to muster any charisma of any kind, portraying a dull and unemotive sixteen-year-old with whom we as the audience at no point ever sympathize or identify. He brings all the personality of a piece of cardboard to the role and is blander than a liter of distilled water. The fault’s not all his; the script endows his character with essentially no characterization. Darren is average in every way: average parents, average home, decent grades, no real problems, no real triumphs. He’s not a character, he’s an aggregate statistic of what normal is. The only attempt at giving him some personality is to establish that he hates freaks and that he’s obsessed with spiders. So that’s the hook that’s supposed to get us interested in him as a character: he’s a douchebag with a creepy hobby. His entire character arc is an after-school special: golly gee willikers, freaks aren’t so bad (there’s even a fucking montage), and you’ve got to just be yourself — which ends up being the key to the plot, of course.

The other focus is on Darren’s best friend Steve, who is the after-school special version of a bad kid. He has problems with teachers, his dad’s gone and his mom’s an alcoholic. He’s also obsessed with vampires and so naturally is totally cool with killing people at the drop of a hat. What is this, a Jack Chick tract? All it’s missing is Dungeons & Dragons making him commit suicide, a joint turning him into a crack whore, and a hug from the scout master turning him gay. Look kid, I know school’s tough and life’s not fair, but maybe in your particular case, your mom’s a drunk because her son’s an asshole.

The highlights of the film are Crepsley at times openly mocking Darren. “No! No!” Crepsley insists in that slow and furious tone of explaining obvious concepts to idiots when Darren asks if he can turn into a bat, “That. Is. Bullshit.” It’s all in the disdainful delivery. The first half of the film is dominated by Crepsley and these sorts of interchanges, which makes it very enjoyable, but the second half deteriorates into cliché after trite cliché, culminating in an ending of such monumental narrative laziness that it is in every way equivalent to “the fighting should stop now, we will go our separate ways until the sequel, because the script says we should.”

I hate giving recommendations on films like this. On the one hand, John C. Reilly and his portrayal of Crepsley are wonderful, the actual circus of freaks is full of entertaining glimpses of creepy and strange characters (“would you like to eat my hands? They grow back, but they taste wonderful”) and the world portrayed resonates with hidden depth. Unfortunately the actual main story, plot, and characters are torn from a horrible after-school special attempt to add a message to Halloween. Maybe rent it on DVD if there’s nothing else at the video store, and fast forward through anything without Crepsley? Wait for a YouTube cutup that strips out the lousy half of the movie?

I’ve gotten two things out of it. I’d really like to see John C. Reilly do something good with no connection whatsoever to the Will Ferrell crew. And I’d like to dig up the dozen-book series upon which Cirque du Freak is based. It is fairly well regarded, though a bit obscure, and I’ve got that niggling suspicion that the books are vastly superior to the film.

Steven Lloyd Wilson is a hopeless romantic and the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. His novel, ramblings, and assorted fictions coalesce at www.burningviolin.com.


Man Camp Seth Gordon | Pajiba Love 10/26/09



Comments

Maybe I'll dust off the old series of books too. Kept me pretty entertained in my Jr. High days.

Posted by: George at October 26, 2009 12:08 PM

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA John C. Reilly looks like an IDIOT.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 26, 2009 12:12 PM

What is this, a Jack Chick tract? All it’s missing is Dungeons & Dragons making him commit suicide, a joint turning him into a crack whore, and a hug from the scout master turning him gay. Look kid, I know school’s tough and life’s not fair, but maybe in your particular case, your mom’s a drunk because her son’s an asshole.

Yeah, you are my hero now, whether you like it or not.

Posted by: Vermillion at October 26, 2009 12:15 PM

"slumming it in oddball minor roles hoping that this has a $50 million weekend and turns into the next Harry Potter..."


/FAIL
//more like 6 million

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 26, 2009 12:15 PM

All it’s missing is Dungeons & Dragons making him commit suicide

Yes, I watched "Mazes And Monsters" when it first aired. Hey, it had Tom Hanks and Chris Makepeace! I liked those guys! The hell happened to Chris? You didn't think his bodyguard was gonna have a more impressive career. No, he ended up co-starring in a movie with Robert Rusler, and then...oblivion.

Posted by: Jay at October 26, 2009 12:15 PM

The title of this movie does nothing to help it's cause.

The assembled words are almost cringeworthy, and when I hear it in my head it just conjures up images of the goth kids in my high school who wrote death poetry and extolled the marvels of bad, gory horror movies. Could have saved themselves some trouble with "The Cirque" or "The Circus Assistant" instead.

And I personally dispute the "poor man's Will Ferrell" description. Willy's gone downhill enough that he is his own poor man unto himself (excuse that black hole of a description). Reilly was more entertaining in Talladega Nights anyway.

SHAKE 'N BAKE!

Posted by: D-Day at October 26, 2009 12:18 PM

Even though this piece of crap is getting the reaming it deserves I can't help but wonder if Christopher Walken would have been a better choice for Crepsley.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 26, 2009 12:25 PM

" I’d really like to see John C. Reilly do something good with no connection whatsoever to the Will Ferrell crew."

Try "Hard Eight", (which IMDB is calling "Sydney"), if you haven't already seen it. J.C. isn't the star, but he's good in it, and it's a great movie.

Trust me on this

-Ralphie

Posted by: Ralphie at October 26, 2009 12:26 PM

lol...really? I found a place that many players are hoo king up with h ot mo dels, seems the club called: __Tallconnect Co M___, do you hear this before?

Posted by: gary at October 26, 2009 12:33 PM

John C. Reilly is the shit. I loathe Will Farell, and I get the Reilly has made a few stupid comedies, but he is a really fine character actor, and a man's gotta eat. I think he takes the stupid roles because he is a real actor who actually wants to work, and takes the better roles when he can. He ain't pretty enough to be picky.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at October 26, 2009 12:48 PM

Reilly was also excellent in Criminal and Gangs of New York, dude can do mean bad-ass with the best of them. He just *looks* like a dork here.

Oh and any Reilly fan NEEDS to see what he does on Tim and Eric and Tom goes to the Mayor.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 26, 2009 12:49 PM

Nice review. Haven't heard much about it, maybe a commercial or two, but that's about it.

No real surprise it's a piece of crap, though. Evidently some coked up loser in H'wood thought "vampires are hot, this could be it".

Welcome to the unemployment line, asshole!

Also, I see the spambots are out again!

Posted by: UncleJR at October 26, 2009 12:49 PM

I though John C. Reilly was the best part of Chicago. Loved his "Mr. Cellophane" scene.

Posted by: Jenilane at October 26, 2009 12:51 PM

Sounds just like Harry Potter.
When the adults are on-screen the movies are great, when it is just Harry, Ron and Hermione...not so much.

This sounds like a good DVD for the Netflix queue.

Posted by: jules at October 26, 2009 12:58 PM

Jenilane!
You took the words right outta my mouth!
He was totally underrated in Chicago!

Posted by: courtney at October 26, 2009 12:59 PM

Yeah, he was awesome in Chicago. Not my favorite part, but damn good.

And my adoration of Jane, extending from 30 Rock, makes me want to see this. But probably not till it hits Netflix.

Posted by: Gabs at October 26, 2009 1:07 PM

Do we get a Sea-Lion molested Turtle Girl in this movie?

Posted by: laredo at October 26, 2009 1:11 PM

I was planning on waiting for the DVD to come out anyway. From the trailers, the title (and that it contains John C. Reilly)I figured it was a spoof movie of Twilight and other vampire related movies in the same vein that Reilly did with Walk Hard. Don't get me wrong, Walk Hard was pretty funny, but I came in with very, very low expectations (I had last seen him in Talladega Nights) and I had a free rental at Blockbuster.

Now that I see it's actually not a spoof, I'll make sure to rent it.

Posted by: alphawhiskey at October 26, 2009 1:12 PM

The books are probably worth a read... I was into them massively as a kid and even went to meet the author at a local book club when he was just starting out. He admitted back then that he'd love the film adapatation to be treated like the Harry Potter's but that it was unlikely to happen.

Id recommend the books though quite good and a lot slower paced than the film as the film combines the first three books. They are packed full of horror. They arent amazing though and are definitely young adult fare rather than for adults.

Still I loved them when I was younger and am pretty disappointed that the film looks like a sunny suburban vampire comedy than roald dahl-esque kids go to freak show and nick spiders.

Posted by: jim of the lower case at October 26, 2009 1:22 PM

@JAY

Chris Makepeace voiced a character for Oblivion?

Posted by: ThunderSacTriumph at October 26, 2009 2:09 PM

I've never seen John C Reilly in a movie where I didn't think he was excellent. The guy is a great actor and funny as all hell.
But I won't see this. The previews make it look like the tween's answer to the vampire trend, but only the kids whose parents think Twilight is too risque for their little'uns. Every line I heard in the trailer was cringeworthy, and that unfortunately includes Reilly's.
I'm happy to read in this review that he's actually good in this, but given what I've seen from the trailer, this is NOT something I'll be seeing.

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at October 26, 2009 2:33 PM

I can't help but wonder if Christopher Walken would have been a better choice for Crepsley

Christopher Walken is always a better choice for anything. always.

Posted by: EricD at October 26, 2009 3:02 PM

There was a guy handing Jack Chick comics out at Oktoberfest this weekend. Sadly, I had to tell him good day as he did not have the Halloween issue "Don't Lick the Devil's Cock".

I checked their website to see what sort of tardtaculous anti-Halloween platform they had going. From their list of tips regarding dealing with trick or treaters:

"10. Won't be home? Leave a box of Chick tracts at your front door with instructions."

Said instructions are, of course:

Happy Halloween! Please take one booklet each to share with your family and friends. We don't know how many kids will be coming by tonight and we'd hate to run out. As you may have guessed, since we have the lights on but no decorations of any kind (well, barring the lighted NASCAR nativity scene we put up last week) we don't have any candy, but we have put out little religious tracts disguised as festive comic books. That's much better than candy, right?

Now, down to business. You'll find that the finish of our automobile is delicate and likely to suffer damage from exposure to raw egg whites and yolks. The 14 dozen eggs that you see on the sidewalk have all been left to rot in their packages for 3 weeks, so you know they'll do the trick. Also, we've parked the car on the street to facilitate your fusillade. Next, our home windows are quite fragile and the rocks of our front yard are notoriously sharp and heavy. We've opened the curtains so that our Hummel figurines and Precious Moments statues may share in our window panes' shattery fates. Oh, we are home, but any flaming bags of dogshit will likely burn out long before we'll consider leaving the cover we've sought since noon under our beds. I'm sure the repeated knocking and doorbell ringing will probably be quite festive, though. We've cut down all the trees in the front yard, but the roof of the house will be a real mess when covered with the toilet paper rolls you'll find on the porch. Finally, you'll note of course that the new white paint job on the house will be quire susceptible to filthy words written on the siding in human excrement. Well, I guess that's it! Have a safe and happy Halloween!

Posted by: laredo at October 26, 2009 3:44 PM

Christopher Walken is always a better choice for anything. always.

I'd almost agree with EricD, but this is one time I'd rather not see Mr. Walken jump on a grenade. But I doubt it would make a big difference on the level of suck involved here. This movie appears to suck at about the same level as Jenna Jameson on a triple hit of E.

Posted by: Xtreme at October 26, 2009 3:58 PM

I must admit when I first saw JCR in the trailer, I spit out my mouthful of whatever I was eating and was overcome with mirth for about half an hour.

Doesn't sound worth my while, even if he is good in it.

Posted by: Jelinas at October 26, 2009 4:36 PM

You know what would have improved this movie?

If John C Reilly had been playing the role of the vampire as if he was Chest Rockwell.

Posted by: Fredo at October 26, 2009 4:39 PM

The books really are quite good, even if the movie looks a bit shite.

Posted by: Shay at October 26, 2009 5:36 PM

I actually feel sorry for this movie, on the one hand, it's a vampire movie, and I've been waging an unending holy war against them, but on the other hand, it at least sounds like it's trying to do something original. It's a shame Cirque de Freak isn't the popular series.

I knew it couldn't be worse than Twilight.

Posted by: George at October 26, 2009 5:41 PM

Stephen! Want to find a good little film with him? See "The Promotion". It's got him and Stifler (I know) in it, but it's a fun little offbeat comedy with a simple premise. I always found Sean William Scott funny, but in horrible, HORRIBLE movies. It was nice to see the 2 in something simple that lets them be ridiculous on their own.

John C. Reilly was also the only good thing in "Chicago" and "The Perfect Storm".

I'm sorry, I just love him as Dr. Steve Brule on "Tim and Eric Awesome Show Great Job!"

Posted by: AlexaCastro at October 26, 2009 10:28 PM

"Poor man's Will Ferrell"??

DUDE. Don't be dissing my Reilly! He was brilliant and HILARIOUS in Boogie Nights and he's been great in every movie he's ever been in. Even the little bullshit roles like the boss in 'Never Been Kissed'. Especially in movies like Step Brothers and Talladega Nights because he is one of those actors who can stay in character FOREVER and ad-lib loads of lively material with a completely straight face. He's a great compliment to Will Ferrell but he is by NO means a poor man's ANYone. He's awesome completely by himself. You can see that in any role he plays.

I'm sure I don't have to name all the other movies that he was "good" in with "no connection whatsoever to the Will Ferrell crew". IMDB and comments above me pretty much have that covered but I will say if you have to say something like that, you really aren't seeing enough JCR films. I recommend starting with the PT Anderson crew and checking out 'Hard Eight', then watching the directors commentary (cause its awesome) and go from there. Until then, I just can't give much credit to what you say about this weird-looking, John C. Reilly vampire movie.

Posted by: bubblegumshoe at October 26, 2009 11:58 PM

Whenever I see the title I think of Zooey Deschanel saying 'Cirque de Face' in The Good Girl.

Posted by: Carrie at October 27, 2009 10:43 AM

i did not like the movie as much as the book to much diffrens

Posted by: wesley whitlatch at October 27, 2009 2:25 PM

i did not like the movie as much as the book to much diffrens you suck

Posted by: wesley whitlatch at October 27, 2009 2:26 PM

I think of that too,Carrie! I think that "circus of the face" quote was like, the only part of that movie I remember.

Posted by: bubblegumshoe at October 27, 2009 3:20 PM

UGH. Don't bother looking for the books. They're terrible; I read them in highschool around the same time I discovered and fell in love with "The Vampire Diaries" and even /I/ could see they were shit. First giveaway? The author's pen name is Darren Shan, thus the main character's name, and his real name is Darren O'Shaughnessy. Self-insert much? The writing is trite and juvenile, the plots simple, cliched and totally unimaginative.

Coming from someone who was obsessed for /years/, I am so over vampires now. Since when did they stop being monsters and start being LAME?

God I cannot begin to tell you how much I hate those books. Yes, they are short and easy to read, but why would you waste your time? Read something by the Australian author Kim Wilkins if you want freaking awesome macabre fantasy.

Posted by: Cookie at October 28, 2009 8:24 AM

I knew this was a terrible movie when Steve (the bad kid) looked up at Crepsley with those big goo-goo eyes and tried to lay his sob story at the vampire's feet. I seriously thought the kid was joking until later in the movie, it hit me: "Oh. It was just terrible acting."

Also, does anyone think that Steve looks like Budnik from Salute Your Shorts?

Posted by: duckandcover at October 28, 2009 1:47 PM

I hate to burst anyone's bubble, but this movie sucked!! I thought it was going to be a hell of a lot better than that. Maybe they will be able to pull off part two. Yes...everybody knows by the way it ended that there will be a part two!

Posted by: Amber at November 9, 2009 3:25 PM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment: