free counter with statistics Bruno Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

brunorev.jpg
You Can't Go Home Again


Bruno / Daniel Carlson

Film Reviews | July 10, 2009 | Comments (104)


The easiest way to sum up the multiple problems with Bruno, writer and actor Sacha Baron Cohen’s follow-up to 2006’s Borat, is to recall the 1949 Looney Tunes animated short “Curtain Razor.” The cartoon starred Porky Pig as a talent agent auditioning oddball acts, the culmination of which was a wolf who drank a variety of poisons and explosives before swallowing a lit match and exploding. Porky, finally amazed, exclaims, “Say, that really is terrific!” Then the door to his office opens and the wolf’s ghost walks in, forlornly complaining, “Yeah, but there’s just one tiny little thing wrong with it: I can only do it once.” Baron Cohen went all out in the first film, a series of candid camera bits involving his awkward immigrant character interacting with small-town Americans, and he tries to repeat that film’s comedic skill and occasional trenchant sociopolitical insight with a new film about, well, an awkward immigrant character interacting with small-town Americans. It’s not that there are no laughs to be had in Bruno; it’s that there are fewer than you’d want, and they arrive almost before the scenes do. The film feels familiar before it even begins to unspool, and returning director Larry Charles’ set-ups feel cheaper and somehow more exploitive than in the earlier film. Bruno goes further than many other comedies in attempting to wrestle certain issues, like the way conservative Americans deal with gays or how some people will do anything for a taste of fame, but the film stops well short of making any new or even interesting points on either front. Most of all, it feels like a dead man trying to come back to life.

Bruno (Baron Cohen) is a gay Austrian fashionista and the host of a local show dedicated to the fashion industry. The film, set up to play like a documentary of Bruno’s life and travels, feels a bit slicker and more scripted than Borat, but the real problem makes itself known right away: This time around, it’s going to be a lot harder for Baron Cohen to get away with his brand of punking people by forcing them to react to his over-the-top character. He jets off to Milan for fashion week, boasting of having backstage access, where he wears a suit made of Velcro and winds up wrecking half the dressing area before stumbling onto the runway and strutting his stuff. But the choppy sequence plays out almost too quickly to enjoy its premise or wonder what will happen, and one official starts herding the camera toward the door before Bruno can even do any damage. The narrative says he’s fired from his TV gig for his incompetence, transitioning to his futile attempts to get into other events in town, but these scenes don’t feel like Bruno’s struggle with rejection: They play like Baron Cohen trying to crash fashion shows and being stopped by knowing security guards. The levels of unreality here are infinitely harder to delineate than in Borat, mainly because it was obviously tougher for Baron Cohen to put together another roadshow after the success of his first film and after his next one was announced. None of the sequences lasts very long, as if Baron Cohen was constantly on the verge of being found out. It’s often impossible to tell what’s really happening versus what purpose it’s being used for, which makes for diverting existential conundrums on the nature of the film but also makes for a messy, uninvolving story. This isn’t a bit on Baron Cohen’s “Da Ali G Show.” This is a feature film, and the finished product limps across the finish line at 83 erratic, disconnected minutes.

Let go from his show, Bruno resolves to travel to the United States to become famous, pursuing several roads to get there. Just as Borat allowed Baron Cohen to examine how some Americans from the small-town South dealt with an obscure foreigner, Bruno lets him taunt the same group with the presence of a flamboyant gay man. To Baron Cohen’s credit, he usually doesn’t have to give them that much rope before they hang themselves, whether it’s the hunting party who visibly bristle at his “Sex and the City” references to the minister who tries to “convert” Bruno back to heterosexuality. Then again, it’s not exactly shocking that some people from that part of the country are homophobic, and Bruno starts spinning its wheels by trying to act like this is a revelation. What’s more, Borat dipped its feet in the same water, parading Baron Cohen and Ken Davitian naked through town whenever possible. The best moments in Bruno aren’t the ones where Baron Cohen conducts uncomfortable interviews with these people, but where he allows himself to just exist near them, passing through their mostly white worlds like a confusing storm.

Co-written by Baron Cohen, Anthony Hines, Dan Mazer, and Jeff Schaffer, with Peter Baynham also sharing a story credit, the film’s weak narrative is built to let Baron Cohen investigate and mock the lengths people will go to just to become famous in America. Sometimes this takes the shape of Bruno’s bizarre quests to do something worthy of renown, like solving the Middle East crisis, making a sex tape, or adopting a black infant to style himself after Angelina Jolie. At other times, Bruno lets his marks do the talking, as in the jaw-dropping sequence in which he interviews parents of young children for a prospective photo shoot with his own baby, asking them increasingly inane and dangerous questions just to determine how much risk they’re willing to invite on their kids to land a lousy magazine spread. The scene is funny in a terrifying way, and it’s the most effective salvo Baron Cohen fires against the American desire for exhibitionism.

And yet there’s no denying that Baron Cohen is fast running out of ways to make his shtick work on this scale. The scenes in which he interacts with “real people” aren’t staged — that amount of tension and discomfort are impossible to fake — but it’s his run-ins with established stars and the larger entertainment industry that really make Bruno head-scratching. Borat concluded with the hero’s attempt to kidnap Pamela Anderson, one of the few sequences that blurred the line between scripted mockumentary and hidden camera show, but Bruno is replete with Hollywood personalities and situations that could easily be in on the joke given Baron Cohen’s success, skill, and connections. At one point, Bruno tries to become a TV star and winds up as an extra on NBC’s “Medium,” but the amount of screwing around he does on set and the consternation he causes star Miguel Sandoval feel disingenuous because he’s not out in the sticks but dancing in the belly of the beast. Baron Cohen’s satire is meant to mock the media, but when you can’t tell what’s real and aren’t sure what to believe, it gets a lot harder to laugh without feeling like the butt of the joke instead of its audience. Baron Cohen’s genuine intelligence and comedic ability are close to being squandered when, instead of creating a comedy focusing on the world around him, he makes a film that steadily becomes nothing more than a tribute to its creator. Worst of all, I’ve already seen this trick.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.


I Love You Beth Cooper Review | The Commitment by Dan Savage



Comments

I hope everyone I know that still talks in the "borat" voice doesn't start doing the "bruno" voice.

Posted by: eden at July 10, 2009 6:09 PM

It's sad that, judging from your review, this movie turned out exactly as I thought it would when I first heard it announced however many years ago.

Posted by: Bistro at July 10, 2009 6:23 PM

I never really cared for Borat in the first place. It just seemed like a social equivalent of "Jackass", where he makes small-minded people feel uncomfortable. Bruno looks much the same - neither entertaining nore really insightful.

Posted by: Leftylad at July 10, 2009 6:28 PM

Never saw "Borat", won't be seeing this. Cohen reminds me of a shock-jock, and I've never been a fan of those, either.

Posted by: Se7en2 at July 10, 2009 6:33 PM

Perhaps a a little too much analysis for a silly movie made to make us forget about our troubles for 84 minutes.

Posted by: Sacha at July 10, 2009 6:44 PM

I don't know. I thought the movie was a bit hillarious, if not gut-wrentchingly upsetting at parts. The reaction the crowd at the cage match has, is alone, pretty unsettling and disgusting. Maybe its not as funny as it is a painful flick.

Posted by: brian at July 10, 2009 7:15 PM

Dan, perhaps everything seemed like a retread to you because of all those commercials, web clips, etc that combined make up the whole godamned movie.

I feel like I have already seen the movie.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at July 10, 2009 7:21 PM

I really hope that Baron Cohen moves on and has a successful career now that all the "Da Ali G Show" characters have been played out (including his terribly awful Ali G movie pre-fame). He is such an intelligent man, and I think that the way he plays/preys on people's psyches can be brilliant at times. One article I read called him a "comic anarchist" and I think that's a true diagnosis of his work so far (not including, of course, his awesome turn in Talledega Nights).

Posted by: Ariel at July 10, 2009 7:44 PM

first review i've disagreed with in a while. bruno was great, go see it.

Posted by: darshlon at July 10, 2009 7:46 PM

The commercials for this are terrible. They're on tv, they're on Hulu, they're in my dreams. If I had any interest in this film before, the ad campaign destroyed it. I am audibly boycotting it.
And Dan writes really pretty reviews.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at July 10, 2009 7:46 PM

I've already said how much I detest these humiliate-the-stranger situations. They exploit people when they don't know they're being humiliated, and even with all their 'consent form' they're no better than Joe Francis and his Girls Gone Wild band of repugnant human beings. Borat was disgusting (really, read about some of the 'methods' they used to get their footage) and Bruno just seems equally repulsive. I hate this man.

Posted by: figgy at July 10, 2009 8:23 PM

A momentary 'jack, but: Kballs, I have some possibly helpful information for you at the end of the Eyes thread.

OK, done.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at July 10, 2009 8:24 PM

Oh Danny boy, the pipes, the pipes are calling
From glen to glen, and down the mountain side
The summer's gone, and all the flowers are dying
'Tis you, 'tis you must go and I must bide.
But come ye back when summer's in the meadow
Or when the valley's hushed and white with snow
'Tis I'll be here in sunshine or in shadow
Oh Danny boy, oh Danny boy, I love you so.

And if you come, when all the flowers are dying
And I am dead, as dead I well may be
You'll come and find the place where I am lying
And kneel and say an "Ave" there for me.

And I shall hear, tho' soft you tread above me
And all my dreams will warm and sweeter be
If you'll not fail to tell me that you love me
I'll simply sleep in peace until you come to me.

I'll simply sleep in peace until you come to me.

Posted by: Guess Who! at July 10, 2009 8:25 PM

DC broke the seal on Loony tunes references.

I agree with him up to a point. I am glad this type of movie is being made. I am not sure from a social stance, that any new insights need to be discovered. If anything, I wish he had nailed them down more. Still, he's trying out his comedy off stage, in public. I dig that. He looked like he was going to get hit more often in this movie than at any time during Da Ali G show or Borat. I call his sometimes vile disgusting low-brow humor brilliant never the less. I tend to side with the brazen prankster, and at least this guy says something more than Tom Green or Trigger Happy TV. I will probably like this more in rerun or DVD, but the overexposure from Borat and all the media make the film-going experience fall flat.

Posted by: Jackseppelin at July 10, 2009 8:41 PM

When I went to see this the theatre was half full. The audience seemed confused about whose point of view they agreed with.
There were derisive noises when the stage parents were trying to pimp out their kiddies, but when the gay-converter man started mouthing off about women, there was a lot of agreement. At the cage fight when Bruno was psyching the crowd with anti-gay stuff, a lot of the audience was getting psyched in the same way. Then with the final twist, I could feel the awkward-fumes drifting over the audience.

Oh, and when Bruno called himself the second most famous misunderstood Austrian, someone said: "who was the other one?"

Posted by: Igor at July 10, 2009 9:09 PM

eden, let's hope not, because I don't think most people (myself included) could do it recognizably or well. Hahaha yikes.

Posted by: Caroline at July 10, 2009 10:28 PM

I was late to Borat, so it was kind of overblown by hype and expectations, but I was really bored by it. Like, thumbing-through-a-National-Geographic-and-reading-the-articles-bored by the end of it. My most vivid memory of Borat was that light pollution in Europe is messing with the migrational patterns of several species of birds.

So maybe this would be fresh to me, but I'll probably let it go by.

Posted by: Barabajagalla at July 10, 2009 11:41 PM

Oh, whee, goody. Another look-at-the-dumb-Southern-hicks movie. As a Virginian, I just can't get enough of being mocked for where I live.

I think Baron Cohen is extremely talented, but one commercial was all it took to know this was Borat II.

Pass.

Posted by: ahamos at July 10, 2009 11:51 PM

ahamos, Don't give me that put-upon bullshit. You Virginians are considered positively cosmopolitan compared with the national impression of your 55 former northwestern counties.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at July 10, 2009 11:56 PM

tcfkab, I responded on the old thread. I need some guidance here. It is at the point that I jerk my eyes up in the hopes that the shit in my eyeballs will get out of my main line of sight.

PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Kballs at July 11, 2009 12:48 AM

TCFKAB,
Regardless of my desperate post above, I need to know a few things:
1. Did you have Lasik or any other corrective surgery before this Vitrectomy? (I had Lasik in Jan. 2007, so this makes all the difference)
2. What kind of horrible pain are you talking about?
3. What goes on during the surgery? (Fuck anyone who might see it, just tell me)
4. Do I have to find a specialist for this?
5. Where did you get it done?
6. How much did it cost?
7. Do you have any recurrences in your repaired eye?
I spent $5K on Lasik and want to clean my useless eyes.

Posted by: Kballs at July 11, 2009 1:07 AM

I agree that its a bit watered down because it follows almost the exact same format as Borat. But there was a lot to laugh at. And I think when done right, like here and with Howard Stern, the "shock jock" type thing works.

Posted by: Dave at July 11, 2009 1:09 AM

Fuck my eyes.

Oh the weather outside is weather . . .

When life gives you lemons, just say, "Fuck the lemons," and bail.

Yes, I'm watching "Forgetting Sarah Marshall" on HBO Signature. Yay DirecTV!

But seriously, my eyes are fucking screwed.

Posted by: Kballs at July 11, 2009 1:41 AM

I thought one of the biggest problems with "Bruno" was that Bruno is a much less sympathetic character compared to Borat. Borat is naive but well-intentioned -- Bruno is naive but self-centered and superficial, making it much harder to care about the outcome of his exploits.

And yes, if you've seen the previews, don't bother going to the movie -- you've already seen the funniest parts.

Posted by: tiff at July 11, 2009 7:11 AM

I happen to know that if you put the three words "BlaCk" and "W h i T e"and "L o V i n g"" together,and input this url with".com".There you can meet hundreds of thousands of nice single girls and guys in your city and find the Beauty of life. The SEXY women and men are a real eye-popper .Dating, , romance,sexy girls,it all happens here.

Posted by: kelly at July 11, 2009 8:20 AM

I happen to know that if you put the three words "BlaCk" and "W h i T e"and "L o V i n g"" together,and input this url with".com".There you can meet hundreds of thousands of nice single girls and guys in your city and find the Beauty of life. The SEXY women and men are a real eye-popper .Dating, , romance,sexy girls,it all happens here.

Posted by: kelly at July 11, 2009 8:23 AM

So what I'm understanding here...correct me if I'm wrong, is that you're not giving me...any money. So, now I'm left, basically, with nothing -- I'm left with ZERO, in which-in which-what can DO with zero? What can I...I can't do ANYTHING with it. I need to...this is my LIFE here, we're talking about! We're not just talkin' about, you know, something else, we're talking about MY life. You know? It's forcing me to do something I don't want to do: to leave. To go out--and just leave. And go home and say...make a clean CUT here, and say: "No way, Corky! You're not puttin' up with these people!" And, I'll tell you why I can't put up with you people....because you're BASTARD PEOPLE. That's what you are--you're just bastard people. And, I'm going home and I'm gonna--I'm gonna...BITE MY PILLOW! 's what I'm gonna do!

[storms off]

Posted by: gunnertec at July 11, 2009 8:34 AM

Maybe Cohen and Maher can do the next movie together with the climatic scene involving an ass beating by a conservative, Jesus loving motorcycle gang. That would be the perfect ending to this genre for these assholes.

Posted by: richmac at July 11, 2009 9:22 AM

Posted by: gunnertec at July 11, 2009 8:34 AM

i want another corky st. clair movie now!

i said, NOW!

Posted by: gp at July 11, 2009 9:41 AM

i second the call for more corky st. clair.

my "remains of the day" lunchbox and "my dinner with andre" action figures have provided immeasurable joy.

Posted by: celery at July 11, 2009 9:53 AM

"Then again, it’s not exactly shocking that some people from that part of the country are homophobic"

I enjoy this site, but I'm getting really fucking tired of seeing entire parts of this enormous country pigeon-holed as a bunch of ignorant idiots. If it was said in jest that would be fine, but it sure looks like its meant to be taken seriously. Pajiba writers have a bigger fetish for environmental determinism than Lovecraft did.

As for this movie, I guarantee that if you dropped a bunch of textbook liberals in a tent in the woods and had a flamboyant gay foreigner crawl in with them naked, you wouldn't get a reaction much different than the one in this movie.

Also, the homophobia in the movie would be harder to swallow (see what i did there?) if Cohen's character wasn't, well, an offensive stereotype deliberately designed to get a strong reaction from hapless everymen who don't know what a 'waiver' is. Wouldn't it be better for the gay rights movement to have a character that shows homosexuals as being just regular people? Some people would say 'well, that wouldn't be funny'. But this movie isn't just trying to be funny, its trying to make a point about homosexuality and how its viewed by Americans.

Just to give credit where credit is due though, it was a moment in movie gold when he tells a terrorist that 'King' Osama Bin Laden looks like a dirty wizard. God that was awesome.

Posted by: Matt 2.0 at July 11, 2009 9:53 AM

the second most famous misunderstood Austrian, someone said: "who was the other one?"

I think he meant the current Governor of California.

I don't know why Baron Cohen felt the need to target the same "marks" as he did with Borat. As someone stated above, Borat could get away with his antics because he came off as a naive innocent.

Bruno always felt like Baron Cohen's way to deflate those self-centered egomaniacs in the media spotlight. I wonder why he didn't go after those targets instead of going back to the God-fearin', middle-America, homophobic rednecks.

Posted by: Fredo at July 11, 2009 10:55 AM

Kballs, (the rest of you may not wish to read this, it's kinda gross)

No, I did not have Lasik before. My eye doctor(s) has never really been able to figure out why I had massive clouds of floaters in my left eye. I just did. And yes, I too was to the point where I had to jerk my head around to try to get them out of my field of view (and if you who ignored my warning above, you probably know what I mean by floaters. They're the little squiggly hairlike things that sometimes float across your field of vision; well, I had big dust bunnies like that in my eye). Floaters are caused by the innner lining of the eye shedding cells, for whatever reason.

The procedure is literally to remove the vitreous of the eyeball and replace it, like with a saline solution or something else that will keep the eyeball round. Yes, this means the doctor pokes a hole in your eyeball and sucks out the jelly inside. IIRC, It was done under local anesthetic, so I literally saw the needle in my eye from my POV, and the drugs were good enough I didn't care.

I had it done by a specialist, but this was 10 or more years ago, and besides the fact I don't recall how much it was that's probably not relevant to whatever the price might be now.

My recollection is that it was more of a hassle than that there was genuine pain. I had to place a shield over the eye every night for awhile, there were lots of eyedrops involved, and it was difficult to see for several weeks, especially under harsh overhead lighting, like in my office (I wore a baseball cap for awhile to try to shield it fom that).

This eye has had several other problems. I had a detached retina, for one thing, and for another I had problems getting the interior pressure of the eye under control. So in a separate surgery sometime later I had a shunt placed atop the eyeball to ease the pressure. I also have glaucoma, and I've had an artificial lens implant, all in the same eye.

The right eye, fortunately, is fine, and because of it although I'm 52 I maintain something like 20-40 vision. Things are a little blurry through the left eye, but I could read with it if I had to.

Bottom line for your purposes, though, is that the vitrectomy worked. I just closed my right eye and looked at a blank wall with my left, and there are zero floaters. None. (I did, once, have a laser treatment to clean up the artificial lens, which tends to develop a kind of film on it over time.)

I go to see the doctor twice a year, to keep an eye (see what I did there?) on the pressure and the glaucoma. They run me through some video-game kinds of tests and so far they seem to have both those issues under control.

I wish you luck. I know how frustrating and maddening it can be to shake your head for 30 seconds and have them float right back into line with your book.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at July 11, 2009 12:10 PM

The commercials for this are terrible. They're on tv, they're on Hulu, they're in my dreams. If I had any interest in this film before, the ad campaign destroyed it. I am audibly boycotting it.

Oh, DVR, I love you for so many reasons.

Posted by: George at July 11, 2009 12:16 PM

"I think he meant the current Governor of California."

please tell me you're joking

Posted by: grendel at July 11, 2009 12:17 PM

One more thing I should point out: I've had so much work done on that eye that my recollections of the procedures and the aftermath of them kind blur together, so everything I wrote is my BEST RECOLLECTION of what it was like. But for the particular procedure we're talking about for your case, whatever I had to endure was absolutely worth it to be able to see reasonably well again.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at July 11, 2009 12:18 PM

Um, Fredo... Oh...

Es macht nichts.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at July 11, 2009 12:30 PM

Did... did you just refer to a Sasha Baron Cohen vehicle and a Warner Brothers classic cartoon in the same paragraph?

There oughta be a law against that sort of blasphemy.

That is all.

Posted by: Sorcha at July 11, 2009 1:07 PM

Then again, it’s not exactly shocking that some people from that part of the country are homophobic

So...I live in Atlanta, I'm gay, and virtually all of my close friends are gay. Atlanta hosts one of the largest (if not THE largest, I've heard from some sources that it's bigger than the one in San Fran) Gay Pride parades in the country.

Sure, there are people who live in the South who disagree with homosexuality for whatever reasons but that doesn't negate the fact that there are some pretty big (relative) gay populations in North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Florida. People seem to easily forget that homophobes (like rednecks) live everywhere, not just in the Dirrty Dirrty.

PS - Isn't it kind of funny that a tiny Midwestern state legalizes gay marriage before Minnesota, California, or New York?

Posted by: Annie_Reckson at July 11, 2009 1:39 PM

Yeah, I didn't even read your review beyond that funny-sounding Looney Tunes bit with the wolf -- it's just too long.

But did you see how unfunny Bruno's Top Ten reading was on David Letterman?

M'gawd it was completely atrocious.

Posted by: Racicot at July 11, 2009 3:21 PM

Is Bruno terrible? Oh hell yes it is, but I was laughing my ass off every second of it. I wouldn't even call it a guilty pleasure. Sometimes it's perfectly ok to watch a bad movie and love it.

Posted by: UncivilizedMike at July 11, 2009 3:26 PM

YeaGawds.
The south has the Bible Belt and The Base. The more people that take the Bible literally, the more homophobes you have. It's not pigonholing. It just is.
Here in Seattle we have a lot of white with dreadlocked stinky hippies.
In California there is lots of sillicone.
And the Midwest is full of sturdy women.

It's Bruno. Do not expect nuance.

Posted by: FrankieZapatista at July 11, 2009 3:52 PM

I figured as much. Borat was overrated. After the first 20 minutes, I got bored and was waiting for the funny stuff to start. It never did. The movie just felt awkward and long.

Posted by: Brie at July 11, 2009 5:05 PM

Ok so I just saw it in a matinee:

1. Everyone is right about the best bits already in the trailers and stuff you can find online. Seriously. Every single scene I would have considered in the top ten scenes of the movie, I had already seen. Kinda diluted the laughs a bit.

2. Yep, the plot structure is almost exactly that of Borat. I lost a bit of respect for Cohen with that. He apparently has one formula.

3. Normally awkward stuff is fine by me. It makes me laugh at times. Some of the awkward stuff in this movie was the kind of awkward in which you are willing to chew your leg off to get away from. At one point he mimes giving a blow job in front of this psychic guy for several agonizing minutes. He doesn't miss a single detail of the pantomime and it's totally silent. We get it. Stop already.

All in all, I'm glad I only went to a matinee and didn't pay full price. I'd rate it a 3 on a scale of 1 to 10. Maybe less than that.

Oh the parents willing to put their kids through ANYTHING to be photographed were absolutely horrifying. That was one part I really did just drop my jaw. The one mom who was willing to have her 30 pound toddler daughter lose TEN pounds in a week and possibly have her undergo liposuction? I hope to God she was lying. That was horrible.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at July 11, 2009 5:18 PM

I think Cohen has the makings of a talented comedian, but I don't like his Borat or Bruno shtick. I don't enjoy seeing anyone humiliated, be it a liberal/conservative/moderate. It's simply not funny to me. I also think cutting down someone else does not make the perpetrator superior, though it may make one FEEL that way. Ultimately, this kind of joke demeans both parties involved.

Also, I have to agree with those who denounce the blanket statements covering a specific region. I come from a blue-collar community that's not exactly known for its progressive views, and yet, I've experienced just as many close-minded individuals here as I did when I attended a diverse 4 year liberal arts college, (which prided itself on being a bastion of progressive thinking.) The opposite can also be said; despite being a largely conservative and strongly Catholic area, my city elected the first openly-gay mayor in New York State history.

Yes, stereotypes are stereotypes for a reason, but pigeonholing a region doesn’t serve to strengthen any argument.

But I digress.

My original point was that I won’t be seeing this movie.

Posted by: Sarah at July 11, 2009 5:40 PM

And speaking of gay, Ryan Reynolds read that Ryan Reynolds got cast as Green Lantern.

Somebody get Rowles some extra absorbent tissues.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at July 11, 2009 8:45 PM

There was no way I was ever going to see this, given that I've never found Sacha Baron Cohen particularly funny, from the days of Ali G up to Borat (with the sole exception of the 'kidnapping Pamela Anderson' scene, which was pretty awesome). But even if I found the guy funny, I'd still be avoiding this movie, largely for the reasons that Matt 2.0 suggested - that Bruno's OTT schtick just doesn't work for me as satire.

The whole gimmick seems to be "watch how uncomfortable and grossed out people get around the gay guy!", but I'm gay as all bejesus, and I'd react with discomfort and annoyance when faced with anyone displaying Bruno's level of obnoxiousness, or being that in-my-face about their sexuality, whether gay or straight. I find Tucker Max's overt heterosexuality kinda disgusting, and don't see Bruno as being much different. There's no point in presenting people with a caricature of gay people and then saying "Look! Look at how homophobic you all are!" when they inevitably react how you're trying to make them react, because all you're doing is reinforcing the negative stereotypes that some people hold while letting others off the hook by making Bruno so cartoonish that the homophobia doesn't seem real.

Look, I don't want to sound militant, and I'm not trying to get all het up on a soapbox about what is essentially a low-brow, crappy film. But I'd point out that if this film involved SBC putting on blackface and wandering around America with a watermelon and a bucket of fried chicken calling people "Massah", this movie would never have hit theatres.

Posted by: Shay at July 11, 2009 9:14 PM

Couldn't agree more, Shay (and I would never have thought of it, but drawing the parallel with Tucker Max is kind of ridiculously appropriate). I didn't enjoy Borat, and I will be skipping this one.

Posted by: meaux at July 11, 2009 10:02 PM

Yaaaaaay! Yet another movie that makes (through the magic of editing) all Alabamians look like brain-dead, fundamentalist hillbillies. Believe it or not, we're not all morons, and finding the handful of mouth-breathers who still scream and yell about homosexuality in the South doesn't make for an interesting or even funny commentary of homophobia. It's makes for sloppy film-making.

That problem aside, the movie is just not that funny. It was much funnier when it was called Borat, and like so many have posted before, all the good jokes, if they're even good, were in the trailers. In short, if you've never seen two guys kiss, seen a pair of balls on the big screen, or witnessed a dildo up close, go see it. If, however, you aren't from an Amish community, you'll not really find anything all that shocking in this movie. I really hate it when people think they're funnier and more clever than they really are. THAT is what made me uncomfortable.

Posted by: The Pink Hulk at July 11, 2009 10:24 PM

One quick note of praise though:

The sequence where Bruno has Mexican workers pose as furniture on which Paula Abdul is asked to sit? Fucking priceless. I reeeeally didn't get the impression that she was in on the joke.

Posted by: The Pink Hulk at July 11, 2009 10:26 PM

Now's the point at which Cohen needs to transition into comedic character work in more traditional fims; his "prank" movies only have so much steam.

He's got the chops; he stole entire scenes away from Will Ferrell and Johnny Depp in Talladega Nights and Sweeney Todd.

Posted by: Daniel Hall at July 11, 2009 11:31 PM

oh geez, bslim, i just logged back on, after being gone all day and you drop the gl news.

put him in a deadpool movie.
give him the freakin flash.

but i can't think of one popular gl that ryan reynolds would fit. and i LIKE ryan reynolds.
and am mainly ambivalent over both hal jordan and kyle rayner (i did read the paperback about rayner's origin, which endeared me to him, but only because it was pictureless and my imagination filled in the blanks.)

*babbles offscreen*

Posted by: gp at July 11, 2009 11:48 PM

here's the deal - i like this site too, but COME ON. borat was not only about hoodwinding/exposing small towners or southerners. if i remember correctly, there were many vignettes in that movie that took place in in L.A. and NYC. yes, there were hilarious parts that capitalized on parts of the south - and that's fine and legitimate, etc. in bruno (which btw was not very funny) there were also parts that made fun of the south - maybe more than other places. again, fine. i'm from the south, and i make fun of things there all the time. what is not fine is this site - which i generally find to be on spot - saying inaccurate things - like borat's premise was making fun of the small-mindedness of southerners. it exposes your own (unfounded) biases. borat was hilarious because it exposed the moral fault lines and cracks in various parts of this country - not just the south. you tick me off, pajiba. i have lived in NYC, texas, and DC, as well as different parts of the south. the south is not the only place where ppl are homophobic or racist or, as you illustrated, small-minded.

Posted by: csc at July 12, 2009 12:03 AM

None of the sequences lasts very long, as if Baron Cohen was constantly on the verge of being found out.

He was, and I was surprised so many of his incomplete gags made it into the film, like the anti-gay protest some paparazzi wrecked for him. To me, it feels like the whole film wanted to do more but he kept being stopped just short of hitting his next plot point. Like, there's so much time spent on stageparents that for the payoff to be one tiny moment, it just didn't seem worth it. It really did play like an All-Bruno special edition of Da Ali G Show.

I still immensely enjoyed the film, if for nothing else than seeing a man who commits so fully to a character go further than he ever has before without a single moment of unintended breaks. Borat had a few "Oh shit, what did I get myself into" moments (the Evangelicals being the most obvious), but Bruno didn't seem to have them at all. Plus, the original song is pretty awesome when you pay attention to exactly what is being said. It's far greater than the fake Kazakhstan national anthem from Borat.

Posted by: Robert at July 12, 2009 10:31 AM

"I think he meant the current Governor of California."

please tell me you're joking

Um, Fredo... Oh...

Es macht nichts.

Well who else? Hedy Lamarr? Maximillian Schell? Egon Schiele? Strauss? Mozart?

....Falco?

Posted by: Fredo at July 12, 2009 12:06 PM

and yes I was being facetious.

Posted by: Fredo at July 12, 2009 12:09 PM

Shay and Pink Hulk, Sacha Baron Cohen isn't going to bat for your rights or acceptance. And this movie is not critique on the South. That Bruno is unbelievable should make people check him in a non-violent way. The point is that people of all stripes are more than willing to believe the worst about someone they've pre-judged as wrong. There is being tolerant, a term I do not like in terms of society, and there is being reasonable. People should not feel the need to be so politically correct that they cannot question something they see as totally bogus. Of course, after they hear the explanation, it isn't necessarily their right to exclude such behavior. Unless, of course, it's naked and climbing inside your tent. Still, the movie was more about multi-layered complex pranks so that Jackass 2 doesn't dictate the way comedians can be funny in public. Not that Bruno should either--I'm mostly impressed by the technique. It is ballsy, and you really shouldn't be too concerned about what ignorant wretches the South looks like to you. I've lived in the South. There are plenty of people who hate. I've lived in the north. They look nicer, but there's a heaping amount of hate up there too. Now I'm in Texas. You can bet your ass that gays have a tough time most places in this state. Mostly it's because the Rage Industry is in full swing in this country, and people, gay or straight or Presbyterian, just don't fucking get over themselves. Half the people think the other side are bad with some good ideas, while we think of ourselves as good but looking to improve our driving force. The righteous indignation swells up and we are left with no middle ground because they are sold on the exact same message but with all their variables reversed with ours. I don't think rifts get resolved so much as we just stop caring to hear about them. It makes all the pointless bullshit much harder to clean off, but do realize that it is somebody's job to push the mop and bucket.

This comedy is a welcome medium outside of stand-up that I would love to see more of even if we have to suffer through Dane Cook or Ashton Kutcher or Steve-O taking their best shots.

I know, I know. We're all hurt now. Some of us thought there was no way we could go to this movie and not bust a gut. It was not to be. I haven't really watched Borat all the way through since the two times I saw it in theatres. I still do catch 20 minutes or so if it comes on tv. I enjoy it. I don't need to watch it a million times, but come on, the shows and movies we do watch like that-- it's pretty fucking sick of us.

Posted by: Jackseppelin at July 12, 2009 12:33 PM

Shay and Pink Hulk, Sacha Baron Cohen isn't going to bat for your rights or acceptance.

No, but his excuse for presenting a film with a flamboyant stereotype of a gay character is that it's designed to hold up a mirror to society; that people are being invited to mock the homophobes, not the homosexual. I'm just saying that that doesn't exactly work, and that even a comedy shouldn't necessarily get away with perpetuating hugely negative stereotypes in the name of "humour". Baron Cohen doesn't have a responsibility to go to bat for mine or anyone else's rights, but if he's going to feed people's bigotry for cheap laughs, he could at least man up and admit that that's what he's doing, rather than hiding behind the "social commentary" shield. Also, to reiterate, is blackface acceptable to most people as a comic device?

Posted by: Shay at July 12, 2009 12:51 PM

Have I told you lately, Shay, that I am kind of a little bit in love with you? Some days, I kind of wish I were a boy.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at July 12, 2009 2:15 PM

After much consideration I think this flick delivered. Honestly, I feel as if different groups are pinning expectations on Cohen that frankly aren't warranted. When has he ever assigned himself as spokesperson for gays? (try never)

This, is what he does, people. He puts the viewer and his targets in uncomfortable situations, sometimes it's funny, sometimes it's awkward almost painful. That's precisely the way he wants it to be. He was never an advocate for gays just as he was never an advocate for Chavs. If you are disappointed that he's just doing longer versions of the Ali G show, that's YOUR issue.

And whoever posted up there that Ali G In Da'House was an awful movie just didn't get it. I think it's a classic in the UHF/Beerfest vein.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at July 12, 2009 4:09 PM

I saw this on Friday.
My impression above all others is that Bruno is as close to modern performance art as you'll see on film.
There's really no way to evaluate modern performance art other than from the standpoint of how you feel. I laughed, I was shocked, I really wish I had been in Fort Smith AR for the cage match (I live in Little Rock).

Posted by: Ian at July 12, 2009 4:28 PM

No, but his excuse for presenting a film with a flamboyant stereotype of a gay character is that it's designed to hold up a mirror to society

I'll agree with Shay and Pink Hulk that all in all, this doesn't do much. I tries to hold a mirror up to society, but in the end, it's a funhouse mirror. You know what would work better? If you put an ACTUAL gay couple in public and see how people react to it. Everything it ends up trying to say is either (A) grossly exaggerated to the point where it can't even be considered representative or accurate, or (B) In no way shocking or controversial. Basically, the only parts that ARE entertaining are total bullshit, and when they actually do make a point, I couldn't give a shit.

That being said, there were parts I laughed my ass off. Oh, and where the hell were Tyler Saint and Tony Cappucci? Seriously, way to blue ball us, SBC. Way to blue ball us.

Posted by: Jeremy Feist at July 12, 2009 5:34 PM

argh i have returned from the pitifully small but exciting (like my penis) mountains of the United Kingdom and am back to the glory that is pajiba. tomorrow my task is to catch up but firstly while I'm angry and drunk I will attempt a post and then retire to bed to masturbate.

Posted by: jim of the lower case at July 12, 2009 6:30 PM

Look, I don't want to sound militant, and I'm not trying to get all het up on a soapbox about what is essentially a low-brow, crappy film.

I don't think you have to worry about getting all het about anything, Shay.

Da Ali G Show > Borat > Bruno (I'm assuming, because I doubt I'll watch it) >>>>>>> Ali G Indahouse. God that movie was terrible. I fucking OWN it, and the only reason I haven't thrown it out is so that I can eventually give it as a present to someone I don't much care for. Oooh, my parents' anniversary is coming up soon...

Posted by: SaBrina at July 12, 2009 6:45 PM

bah SaBrina ali g in da house wasnt so much terrible just an anomaly... it was baron cohens first and only try at a non reality tv scripted setting. it is quite singularly scary at both skewering and informing what is called chav culture over here in the UK...
Heck half the time our politics looks more like that film than any other; with our politicians arguing with each other over what to classify cannabis as in an attempt to curry favour with certain elements of society and also with politicians announcing hug a hoodie campaigns to involve the youths (sic) that baron cohen was parodying and influencing with the character.

Somehow that film is the most prescient in terms of modern britain.

How Ive missed pajiba

Bless you godtopus.

Posted by: jim of the lower castle at July 12, 2009 7:03 PM

JIM, aren't you supposed to be masturbating right now?

OK, all that might be true, but it meant nothing to me, being an ignant Murican. To my friends and I, it was just stupid, poorly acted, and proof that he was nowhere as good at writing movie scripts as he was at improv-ish TV.

Hug a Hoodie, though? Is that the for real name, because holy poop that is awesome. Are you supposed to randomly go up to street toughs and wrap your arms around them? That sounds kind of like sexual assault.

... I like it.

Posted by: SaBrina at July 12, 2009 7:21 PM

"Ali G Indahouse. God that movie was terrible. I fucking OWN it.."


I submit that you wouldn't know a good comedy even if the DVD was covered in Banana Cream and someone plastered it all over your face, madam.

Good day, to you.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at July 12, 2009 7:24 PM

Yeah, I probably wouldn't. I'm not a big fan of slapstick comedy.

Posted by: SaBrina at July 12, 2009 7:30 PM

I said GOOD DAY!

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at July 12, 2009 7:37 PM

masturbation was fun but pajiba is more so...

ali g in da house is still poorly acted and crazily plotted and executed,especially compared to all of baron cohens other work.

And Hug a Hoodie is seriously the name that david cameron (he of the leader of the oposition) used as a way to get involved with yoof culture...

what a prick.

man im so tired i could do with a good sexual assault... far less effort than real life.

Posted by: jim of the lower case at July 12, 2009 7:42 PM

Thanks, you have a good day too, Slim!

Jim (Heehee, Slim and Jim. STEP INTO A SLIMJIM!), you can't complain about your sex life when you have an open invitation from a New Yorker that you are blatantly ignoring.

Posted by: SaBrina at July 12, 2009 7:52 PM

hmm how to ignore that comment...

argh im too tired to ignore it so ill just blame unemployment.

Time to sign on at the job centre tomorrow with the old UB40.

Posted by: jim of the lower case at July 12, 2009 7:58 PM

Slim, sometimes (when I'm drunk) I have to tell you that I love you. This is one of those times.
UHF should not go unnoticed.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at July 12, 2009 8:08 PM

Oh whatever, the offer was rescinded after that comment about your penis anyways.

Posted by: SaBrina at July 12, 2009 8:12 PM

oh no ive broke SaBrina

Posted by: jim of the lower case at July 12, 2009 9:02 PM

well, at least now we have a good excuse to take SaBrina in and get her fixed...

Posted by: gp at July 12, 2009 9:31 PM

Yeah, how does it feel to be the one who's internet-rejected NOW, huh? OOOH DOES IT BURRRRN LIKE PAIN??

I mean... unless you've changed your mind...

NO. BE STRONG, SAbRINA!

gp, were you waiting for an excuse to have me fixed? Because that's a little creepy. And strangely alluring.

Posted by: SaBrina at July 12, 2009 9:56 PM

there are quite a few on here that could use a good fixin'.
*looks around for kayanne*

but no, i wasn't waiting around or anything. i'm just in a spay-and-neutering kinda mood lately.

on mother's day, i had to put down my baby girl (she was 17)... and recently i adopted a chihuahua named paso doble (p.d.) and even though he's 2, he's still got his balls.
and we're trying to decide if and when to have them clipped.

it's almost a shame to do so. he's all of half a pound, and half of THAT is ballage. the heft in this sack! and i work with a 170lb great dane and p.d's lipstick is just about the same damn size! THAT'S MY BOY!

(creep-o-meter goes up, allure goes down.)

but seriously, he's so cute; his apple-head is made for kissin'.

Posted by: gp at July 12, 2009 10:13 PM

Dan,

Please see and review Moon if possible. I thought it was fantastic, and so would many here in the Pajibaverse. The world needs to KNOW about this movie. Also, there's only one character and it's Sam Rockwell. SAM ROCKWELL PEOPLE.

Posted by: AM at July 12, 2009 10:31 PM

Um...ok Jackseppelin...

This comedy is a welcome medium outside of stand-up that I would love to see more of even if we have to suffer through Dane Cook or Ashton Kutcher or Steve-O taking their best shots.

I'm going to skip over the first paragraph of your comment, because to be honest, it was really long and drawn out, but as much as you wanna decry it and underline it, this comedy failed because it just wasn't funny. It was mildly humorous at BEST. In fact, in the crowded theater in which I saw the movie, only one guy laughed consistently, and I'm pretty sure he was just high.

I guess at 33, I just don't find dick jokes the height of hilarity anymore, but I guess it could just be because I'm a militant Southerner and Homosexual. That big ol' chip on my shoulder makes it hard to bust a gut laughing.

Posted by: The Pink Hulk at July 12, 2009 10:41 PM

but seriously, he's so cute; his apple-head is made for kissin'.

That is what she saaaaaid.

I thought you were talking about putting down your daughter at first, and shit that was scary. What kind of dog was she?

AM, I'm pretty sure Moon has been reviewed on here already.

Posted by: SaBrina at July 12, 2009 10:47 PM

she was a mutant mix. but she was real chill.
putting her down was the hardest thing i've ever had to do.

and i haven't had a boy dog since i was a kid.
when i first got him, i was rubbing his belly and thought, what the hell? oh yeah...
he's part scaredy cat/part bad ass.

and he sits up like a meercat.
airing out the goods, as one does...

Posted by: gp at July 12, 2009 11:00 PM

Really?
Good place for all big and tall singles, please check:
____Tallconnect Co M____ ,More fun waiting for you...

Posted by: Owen at July 13, 2009 8:13 AM

Great review! Many of my feelings about the film currently revolve around some of these issues; I'm trying to keep unbiased, but it does seem very much like the skit is a little tired. Plus I really think that while Baron Cohen's comedy is at times sophisticated, he plays a dangerous game of pandering to lower urges and thoughts in his audience - i.e. in Borat we're laughing at the racists but also laughing at the funny accent; in Bruno I expect that we'll be laughing at the homophobes but mostly at the big flouncy gay man. He can't have it both ways.

Posted by: Caspar at July 13, 2009 8:20 AM

It felt as if they had nothing to work with so they just brought out the dicks and asses. It was a strained experience watching the movie.

Posted by: Candy at July 13, 2009 8:32 PM

Oh Anna. If only you were a boy, and lived in the same continent as me. We'd be deliriously happy til we realised that we're actually the same person, at which point it would just get kinda weird. But we could have lots of crazy sex before then...

Posted by: Shay at July 13, 2009 8:34 PM

Pink Hulk, I knew you were the last two, but who knew you were so old? I swaer, you put some of your elders to the yard. What, are you crotcheting in the parlor room snifting bottles of rye in between posts to the Pajiba?

was that ball of string enough for you?

Posted by: Jackseppelin at July 13, 2009 9:17 PM

Get off my lawn! Get OFF my lawn!

Posted by: The Pink Hulk at July 14, 2009 1:44 AM

Bruno/Borat is intellectually stimulating humor for the deeply pretentious.

It puts stupid people on a box and throws stones at them for being stupid, then expects a gold star for cleverness. To say nothing of playing into stereotypes.

I've got family who are Roma. They moved to the southwest from Jersey because up until about a decade ago, there were actually anti-Roma laws on the books in that state. (Of course, that's one up on make-the-Roma-register-with-the-government law in Italy that was passed a year ago, but still.) My girlfriend and I moved here to the southwest because we figured we've got as good a chance as being treated like freaks here like we were in the north. Of course, the racially-exclusive clubs and churches we kept encountering up north helped with that decision.

So what I want to know is Daniel: you care to run your fucking review by me one more time?

Posted by: Jen at July 15, 2009 8:24 AM

Fredo:

It's Hitler you dumbass.

Posted by: Big E at July 15, 2009 6:02 PM

hey jen (who posted at July 15, 2009 8:24 AM):

i remember the roma fondly while travelling throughout europe ~ bunch of fuckin' BEGGARS that harrassed your ass no matter where you fuckin' went. and i'm not talking "begging with @ least a little bit of dignity" - - this was full on aggressive begging where they would practically hang off your arms & legs until you gave them money. these fuckin' people were EVERYWHERE! shameless fuckin' people, sending young & old to harrass hapless people. truly awful fuckin' people.
then, i come back to north america. here these fuckin' people are. i couldn't believe it. same shit. but now this time, not only are they aggressively begging, they're also taking the taxpayers' money by getting government assistance. wtf?!?
in europe, they despised the roma. in north america, same fuckin' thing. get the fuck outta here!
that's what i think of your comment, you fuckin' douchebags!

Posted by: Ishtap Begen at July 16, 2009 12:13 AM

Greetings to those wandering fat babes! Are you guys still worried about your overweihgted body? always the loser in a relationship huh? Ain't love innocent? there must be another way for us fat babes. I do believe it. And i fell in love with a fat guy in this April thanks to the website http://www.plusflirt.com/ i wanna share it with all of you. it is really the right place for us fat group.You are warmly welcomed to this site.

Posted by: nikkibabes at July 16, 2009 2:19 AM

This film was rubbish. The reviews are misleading, unless the reviewers really are stupid. Just about all scenes are obviously staged and scripted, making any shock value useless.One or two amusing sections in the Middle East but not the exposure of predudice that was billed and promised. Very dissapointed

Posted by: Tam at July 16, 2009 4:35 AM

The Roma, you fucking racist, have been so cut off rom regular society in Europe that according to the UN, the average life expectancy and living standard of a Roma is equal to that of any third world citizen.

I love how people ont this site think they are so fucking educated and liberal.

Posted by: Jen at July 16, 2009 4:37 AM

Response to Jen at July 16, 2009 4:37 AM:

whatever buddy. i'm sure you're scheming of some way to get more government assistance. how'd you get over here? you probably took a "vacation" and then claimed refugee status to stay. now our tax dollars are paying for you while you scheme your way on how to beg/steal from people and then get the rest of your family over here.

europe already knows how awful you people are and that's why everyone there despises you. now you're bringing your shit here to north america 'cause no one knows of your reputation abroad.

we've already got problems we need to take care of in this country. now we gotta take care of and worry about you, too?!? now we all have to look over our shoulders, wondering when you guys are going to steal from us.

north americans were thankful that the roma problem only existed in europe. now here you all are. fuck. it's about time someone spoke the truth. we're sick of people living off of us.

Posted by: Ishtap Begen at July 16, 2009 1:44 PM

Really?

To whom it may concern,

I fully agree people don't need there buttons pushed... They need their vending machine masquerading as a life kicked in, but maybe it's because I am not some "PC" bullshit nazi.

Am I racist, sexist, homophobic, etc no.

But you whiny mother$%^()# are just a sicking as the aforementioned issues.

Get off your politically correct socially acceptable soapbox and kill yourselves because I don't want have to share precious resources and
space with an uptight a-hole and you would make better compost heap then a real contributer.

Bruno 8 out of 10

Ron Paul Sex tape out soon.

Posted by: Down with liberals-and-conservatives at July 18, 2009 8:48 PM

I enjoyed this film a lot more than the reviews led me to believe I would. I don't really understand all the hatred directed at Cohen or "Bruno", it's just a comedic farce and it succeeds at that level. With all due respect, many of the above comments read like they were written by folks who didn't even bother checking it out before they decided it sucked.

Posted by: Avery Bondage at July 19, 2009 3:15 PM

Bruno was a filthy, painful waste of time.

I cannot believe I was stupid enough to not read a review about it first. It was 60 minutes of vile filth, abhorrently offensive, brainless: a waste of $17. If CHILD ABUSE offends you, if graphic HOMOSEXUAL PORNOGRAPHY offends you (just a straight porn would offend someone - no Im not homophobic) and If watching real COUPLES Have SEX and S&M scenes offends you(although some may be turned on by this), and RELIGIOUS VILIFICATION and RACISM offends you, then PLEASE DO NOT SEE THIS MOVIE.

Little Britain was funny, Summer Heights High was funny, We Can Be Heroes is funny.... This is NOT. For me who has a high tolerance to "unique" movies, and I "get satire", in fact i love it. But I found this INHUMANE and PUTRID. It was an ASSAULT to my senses, my ears and my eyes.

To see a "Black Baby" by the name of "OJ", being crucified on a cross, and a penis that fills the screen. Shame on the musos (Bono??) at the end who supported the Cruelty, Ignorance and Hate in this movie. It is very sad that it relies on extreme antics. This movie is all about bad values. This movie will do nothing to win points for the Gays, and this was part of the movies intention. Simply a painful,vomitous extension of "Jackass:The Movie" - nothing original at all.

Yes I "get it", No it is not right: BOYCOTT BRUNO.

Posted by: mila at July 20, 2009 10:21 AM

this movie sucked. i only watched like 30 minutes of it in the theatre. i'm gay and it makes gay people look sick. i hated it and i dont know who in the world even thought of making this movie because i would rather pay to watch paint dry than see this movie again. i just hope that if anyone wants to see, don't. it is a waste of money. all that was pretty much was a pornography movie.

Posted by: tyler at July 20, 2009 6:33 PM

Yes this movie seemed more contrived then "Borat" ever was. But it does touch on issues such as homophobia (from the low and the HIGH alike), celebrity, the lust for fame and sexuality. The story itself is very funny and at times even endearing. The gentlemen who played Lutz deserves much praise for his performance. Baron Cohen and Company at least commit themselves fully to their work and the work is more entertaining for it. No one group is spared from ridicule. The Springer scene with "OJ" had me in fits.

I tip my hat to the self defense instructor who showed Bruno how to handle an attack by sex toy. He handled it with aplomb and decency, never going on the defensive even when showing how to fight defensively. Though I must admit that his terrorist/gay analogy was a bit chilling to hear. But otherwise he was the only person in the film that did not fly off the bit once the game was up.


Posted by: Mr. West at July 20, 2009 9:49 PM

Fun fact: the scene where Bruno's training with the US Army is Fort McClellan, in Aniston, Alabama. It is a training site for military police and the Officer Candidate School. I was there training Phase 1 of officer school when the incident happened(the black captain in the movie, Captain Miles, was my platoon commander). SBC talked his way into the base by pretending he was actually a journalist covering military training in times of war.

Posted by: Daniel Valentin from Puerto Rico at July 22, 2009 11:14 PM

Usually you're on the money but I feel that this review of Bruno misses the point. Yes, it's extremely formulaic in that it is exactly the same format as Borat, but it's a silly comedy film - it doesn't have to be clever, subtle, original or indeed ANYTHING ELSE other than funny. But humour is very subjective, of course, and so your comment that it has fewer laughs than Borat is essentially redundant. I found Bruno to be hilarious but I can appreciate that my parents, for example, would think that it is shocking beyond belief.

Love him or hate him, no one can deny that Sacha Baron Cohen is incredibly brave to take the risks he does in both of these films, putting himself in some highly dangerous situations to give us a laugh. The climactic 'Straight Dave' scene is utterly terrifying and - thanks to the actors' incredible method acting in the face of real physical danger - genuinely moving, and while you're right to say that Bruno doesn't teach us anything, it does compound very dramatically (and creatively) the sad fact that homophobia is still rife in certain sections of society.

Posted by: Nick Jones at July 26, 2009 9:44 AM

Usually you're on the money but I feel that this review of Bruno misses the point. Yes, it's extremely formulaic in that it is exactly the same format as Borat, but it's a silly comedy film - it doesn't have to be clever, subtle, original or indeed ANYTHING ELSE other than funny. But humour is very subjective, of course, and so your comment that it has fewer laughs than Borat is essentially redundant. I found Bruno to be hilarious but I can appreciate that my parents, for example, would think that it is shocking beyond belief.

Love him or hate him, no one can deny that Sacha Baron Cohen is incredibly brave to take the risks he does in both of these films, putting himself in some highly dangerous situations to give us a laugh. The climactic 'Straight Dave' scene is utterly terrifying and - thanks to the actors' incredible method acting in the face of real physical danger - genuinely moving, and while you're right to say that Bruno doesn't teach us anything, it does compound very dramatically (and creatively) the sad fact that homophobia is still rife in certain sections of society.

Posted by: Nick Jones at July 26, 2009 9:46 AM

This movie sucked, he went too far to try and make it funny. Looks way too staged and was really unfunny. -1 point for Sasha Baron Cohen.

Posted by: watch informant online at September 8, 2009 10:12 AM