web
counter
 

Boogie Nights Review: You're the Cock of the Walk, Baby!

By Drew Morton | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (28)



boogie-nights.jpg

Boogie Nights (1997), Paul Thomas Anderson’s follow-up to his stellar chamber/crime drama Hard Eight (AKA Sydney, 1996), is a film that has stayed with me since I saw it as a freshman or sophomore in high school. Contrary to what may be your gut reaction, my favorable reaction to the film was not inspired by the nude beauty of either Julianne Moore or Heather Graham. Rather than being swept away by the sensual presence of the female form, I was dazzled and intoxicated by Anderson’s embrace of film form to capture the tone and mood of what is essentially a three-hour version of a VH1 “Behind the Music” special except, in this case, the story is the rise and fall of a porn star primarily; Dirk Diggler (Mark Wahlberg) only attempts to be a pop star…poorly.

When the film begins in the late 1970s at a discotheque in the San Fernando Valley, Anderson’s style flies as high as Amber Waves (Moore) after a line of coke. Split-screens, Steadicam shots, and overlapping edits are used to introduce us to this peanut gallery of a family, formed not by marriage and genetic bond, but by their social outcast status. For instance, Buck Swope (Don Cheadle) is down and out because he does not embody the black, masculine ideal. A stereo salesman by day, Swope’s demo music of choice when testing out the bassy kick of the TK-421 is not the funky sounds of Earth, Wind, and Fire or Sly and the Family Stone. Rather, it is pure, unadulterated, country. His trajectory throughout the film is one of looking for identity. When he skews the other way and attends a “Hello, 80s!” New Year’s Party, he dons a Rick “Super Freak” James outfit. Yet, by the end, Buck finds a way to deal with his outcast status and he embraces who he really is after a violent encounter in a doughnut shop. His tale stands as a start contrast to protagonist Dirk Diggler.

Diggler, or the kid formerly known as Eddie Adams from Torrence, is introduced to us in the nightclub as well. A bus boy in his late teens with assets of mythic proportions, Eddie is so attracted by the nightlife offered by the club that the long bus ride from south of LAX to the northern end of the city is not of any consequence. We soon find out what he is running from: a family life defined by a shrew of a mother, who belittles her child for taking the road to nowhere. While he attempts to escape into the womb of his room, lined with posters of fast cars and faster women, not even Farrah Fawcett can keep mom at bay. Eddie is kicked out of the house and seeks shelter with Jack Horner (Burt Reynolds), porn director.

Eddie’s escape from home begins his journey to redefine his identity. In the beginning, he’s Eddie Adams from Torrence. Once he reaches Jack’s house and is embraced in the form of a massive pool party, complete with girls ODing on coke, margaritas mixed by resident magician turned stunt cock (John C. Reilly), and gravel-assed driveway sex, Eddie goes out the window and becomes, lined in neon, Dirk Diggler. On the set of his films, he insists on being called Dirk. After becoming successful in the spunk racket, his drapes are monogramed with his stage name; his posters of fast cars and fast women have been replaced by their actual. Eddie Adams has become the house that Dirk Diggler can never return to. Instead of realizing his identity over the course of the years like Buck does, Diggler fools himself into believing he’s a star. It’s a tragedy. Watching Boogie Nights is akin to watching a car crash in progress.

The reason why Diggler’s transformation towards the dark side works so well is primarily due to two factors. First, in one of his first screen roles, Wahlberg’s portrayal, unlike his later roles (The Other Guys, The Departed) is played as faux cockiness. Diggler’s desperate attempts to underline his own significance portray a buried vulnerability, a pathetic quality. Over the years, Wahlberg has turned this into actual cockiness and swagger, and it takes away everything that is endearing about the persona he established in Boogie Nights. It feels forced into overly masculine heights and, quite simply, feels like getting hit on the noggin with a tack hammer after a while. The second trait the film has in its corner for telling the rise and fall of Diggler is again, Anderson’s wrangling of film form to fit mood. The first half, chronicling the 70s, is defined by hyperkinetic camera and editing techniques. We are invited into the world of Jack Horner, Amber Waves, and Dirk Diggler with flash and pizazz. Yet, the film includes a Steadicam shot that effectively breaks the spell of drugs, soul, and sex. During the transition from 1979 to 1980, Little Bill (William H. Macy), one of the technicians on the set of Horner’s porn epics, discovers that his wife (porn starlet Nina Hartley) is once again being unfaithful. Having been disgraced numerous times before, Bill reaches his breaking point and Anderson follows him, dazed, through the party in an unbroken shot. When Bill arrives at his car and removes a handgun, the conclusion is obvious.

The second-half of the film trades flash for an ominous gloom. Diggler remains largely the same, intoxicated by his ego, but the form of the film no longer allows us to buy into his lifestyle. When he quits porn and attempts to break into the music industry with “You’ve Got the Touch” and “Feel My Heat,” we feel a distance from the character that is markedly different from the beginning. Instead of being an object of desire, Diggler has become a self-obsessed caricature, held up for our ridicule. The characters who have been led into a life of illusion hit bottom hard, Michael Penn’s score underlying the inevitable sadness with bells chiming and Anderson exchanging the free will of montage to the fatalism of the long take.

My main criticism of the film, and a slight one at that, is that Anderson never acknowledges the elephant in the room: the AIDS crisis and how it affected the porn industry. As a somewhat historic study of the industry, it’s odd that he deals with the transition from film to video but not the more physical toll that porn takes on its talent. I did not wish to see Diggler, Amber, or the other family members “punished” for their actions by contracting HIV, but to never mention the disease at all or steps taken on behalf of the production crew is akin to making a film about King George VI and only focusing on how the guy couldn’t speak publically. Still, like The King’s Speech (2010), Boogie Nights flies thanks to its performances. But this one also has Anderson’s honed style, an asset of even bigger proportions than Dirk’s member.

Drew Morton is a Ph.D. student in Cinema and Media Studies at the University of California-Los Angeles. His criticism and articles have previously appeared in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the UWM Post, Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Flow, Mediascape, The Playlist, Senses of Cinema, and Studies in Comics. He is the 2008 and 2010 recipient of the Otis Ferguson Award for Critical Writing in Film Studies.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



That's So Gay Balls | The Best Lines from NBC's Thursday Night Comedy Block | A Seriously Random List | The Prisons of the Future









Comments

That was a great review, Drew, and spot on.

Posted by: admin at February 4, 2011 11:41 AM

A movie I've watched almost every year since '97, and sometimes more than once a year. Also, the only film soundtrack I own, despite my dislike for owning soundtracks/best ofs/collections etc.

The opening scene is still only example of perfect style/technique/score/exposition/mood setting/character introduction etc. etc. that I've seen. Then again, as you can tell I'm slightly biased.

Posted by: headmonkeys at February 4, 2011 12:12 PM

Headmonkeys, watch Goodfellas again.

Posted by: Brian at February 4, 2011 12:45 PM

I agree, headmonkeys. I've always said that this film is one of the most, if not THE most, technically perfect films I've ever seen.
I'm biased too, as this is hands down my absolute all time favorite movie ever.

Posted by: anon33 at February 4, 2011 12:50 PM

"First, in one of his first screen roles, Wahlberg’s portrayal, unlike his later roles (The Other Guys, The Departed) is played as faux cockiness. Diggler’s desperate attempts to underline his own significance portray a buried vulnerability, a pathetic quality. Over the years, Wahlberg has turned this into actual cockiness and swagger, and it takes away everything that is endearing about the persona he established in Boogie Nights."

Beg pardon, but Wahlberg stole the show in The Departed with all his cockiness and swagger. He owned every scene he was in, so to knock him down for it is just...odd. Now don't get me wrong, Boogie Nights has been a favorite of mine for a long time, ever since I saw Heather Graham for the first time in the trailers. I can't lie, I went for the nudity and the promise of a nekkid Graham, but the film is filled with fantastic performances and humor. And while it wasn't his first film, it showed us for the first time that Wahlberg was going to be a star, a bright and shining star.

Posted by: EJ at February 4, 2011 1:02 PM

EJ,

I can tolerate that in "The Departed," mainly because the script is so damn good. He is just beginning to feel one-note to me and it's an obnoxious note at that.

Posted by: Drew Morton at February 4, 2011 1:05 PM

Headmonkeys,

Try "The Player." Great opening continuous camera shot, something like 8-9 minutes long, that sets everything up beautifully.

Posted by: , at February 4, 2011 1:16 PM

Drew,

I'll grant you this: Wahlberg was the least memorable character in "The Fighter."

Posted by: , at February 4, 2011 1:17 PM

BN was the first time I had ever seen Alfred Molina on film. What an iconic role...seriously. That scene made me about a nervous as I've ever been watching a movie. "Why won't that chinese guy stop lighting those firecrackers, goddamn it!?!" I kept repeating to myself.

My bias is towards PTA's other behemoth, Magnolia which I find his true masterwork. While not as re-watchable as BN, it is superior.

Posted by: gunnertec at February 4, 2011 1:20 PM

The "family" dynamic of the characters in Boogie Nights was what impressed me, particularly Burt Reynolds and Julianne Moore as the paternal and maternal figures respectively. Amber's doomed attempt to gain custody of her child and the scene with Dirk turning to Jack after hitting rock bottom will always stick with me.

Posted by: Craig at February 4, 2011 1:46 PM

BN is one of my favorite films - I have seen it dozens of times - and not once did it occur to me to find fault in it because it doesn't mention AIDS.

It's like saying that Exit through the Gift Shop sucks because there aren't enough gift shops in it. You can't fault a movie for what it is not.

Well, I mean, you can, but come on.

Posted by: Skyler Durden at February 4, 2011 4:00 PM

It didn't deal with HIV and AIDS for a much more simple reason. There really wasn't that much AIDS in the straight porn community. Lisa De Leeuw is the only female listed on the Dead Porn stars list/AIDS. And that is a debated topic. HIV/AIDS is very rare in straight porn. A dozen or so(yes, that is way too many). And almost all of them from male performers who did gay/tranny movies. But considering the sheer number of partners, and sexual acts, the number is shockingly low.

Posted by: Sean at February 4, 2011 4:06 PM

Skyler,

Only "Exit Through the Gift Shop" isn't about gift shops and Boogie Nights deals with porn and promiscuity. Not sure how your analogy (pun intended) works out.

Sean,

Given that I am not a porn historian, I have to take you at your word, but that is a good point. I'm not saying it should have been a plot point, but not even a reference to the condom use or something was a bit odd.

Posted by: Drew Morton at February 4, 2011 4:29 PM

Especially given that Diggler was based on Holmes of course.

Posted by: Drew Morton at February 4, 2011 4:30 PM

I am a huge Boogie Nights fan. Need to buy it on DVD as I only have it on VHS (shows you how long ago I bought it).

gunnertec - Magnolia is also my favorite PTA movie, but this one just blew me away the first time I watched it.

And regarding ,'s comment about Wahlberg's performance in "The Fighter", I don't think it's really fair to say he was the least memorable character or at least make that due to Wahlberg's portrayal. It's hard to stand up to two amazingly written and terrifically acted characters like Dickie and Alice. I think the whole point of the film was that he was always on the backburner in his own family. If his character had been bigger, it wouldn't have felt true. His place in the family was defined by him being the quiet, take-what-comes-his-way kind of guy. I mean, his character as much as said that when he finally reached his breaking point and told everyone fighting over him/his career, "Here's what I want: I want all of you in my corner."

I'm not saying Mark Wahlberg is a genius of an actor but I thought he played nicely against and balanced out the bombastic, brilliant performances by Christian Bale (God love him) and Melissa Leo.

Just sayin'. . .

Posted by: prairiegirl at February 4, 2011 5:58 PM

I was under the impression Holmes turned to gay porn during his slide and into the rock bottom days. He died from AIDS, in fact. Its a legitimate point fact, but I believe its inclusion would have killed the film. Just my opinion- there was already so much going on another plotline might have done it in.

Posted by: EJ at February 4, 2011 6:00 PM

One of my all-time favorite films.

As far as the omission of AIDS, remember the movie's timeline--it doesn't go terribly far into the 1980s. The first New York Times mention of the disease was in the summer of 1981, and it wasn't even called "AIDS" until a year later. The Times' headline read, "Rare Cancer Seen in 41 Homosexuals", and, in the early years, it was thought to occur only among "homosexuals, hemophiliacs, and Haitians". At the end of 1981, there were only 152 reported cases in the world. It would later kill more than 25 million.

Straight porn stars would probably not have worried about AIDS until the mid-80s, if then. (Holmes, probably the best known porn star to get AIDS, died in 1988, and had done a number of same-sex videos.)

We know what's coming, but the characters don't. There's no more reason to refer to AIDS than there is to refer to the events of September 11.

Posted by: bcarter3 at February 4, 2011 9:58 PM

@ Brian, I also love Goodfellas, and you're right, that opening shot is perfect in terms of meeting my previous criteria, how could I forget it. I guess I was just temporarily blinded by my Boogie Nights love.

@ ',' Haven't seen The Player, but I have seen the opening tracking shot, and it's also great. Though I prefer the BN one if only because it's a more vibrant scene (can't beat The Emotions)

Posted by: headmonkeys at February 5, 2011 10:05 AM

Hate to pull an AOL-style "me too!" posting but bcarter3 hit 17 nails on the head. Drew is flat out wrong here (and only here because the rest of his review is quite good). bcarter3 is full on right.

Before the later 1980s (not even the mid-80s), I'll bet the mortgage that there isn't a single person/producer in porn sincerely worrying about using condoms. At that time, condoms and AIDS are no where near the porn production radars.

Put it this way, the Adult Industry Medical Health Care Foundation wasn't even founded until 1998. Until then, AIDS was more or less dealt with using a non-scientific, Russian roulette method. And if you tried to use condoms, hardly bought your video tapes. This last point is still pretty true even to this day.

Posted by: JudoChop at February 5, 2011 1:42 PM

I love this movie but unashamedly watch it mainly for the last scene.

Posted by: wildflower at February 5, 2011 7:22 PM

Bcarter may have converted me...

Posted by: Drew Morton at February 5, 2011 9:03 PM

my fucking wife has an ass in her cock in the driveway! I'm sorry if i'm not concerned with the cinematography

Posted by: Wadji at February 5, 2011 11:20 PM

I guess I need to try and watch this again. There was something about the less-than-serious feel of the whole thing that turned me off right off the bat and I confess I didn't give it a chance.

On the side topic of awesome open sequences, Serenity's is still one of my faves.

Posted by: Protoguy at February 6, 2011 2:37 AM

"my fucking wife has an ass in her cock in the driveway!"

huh wha?

Posted by: Protoguy at February 6, 2011 2:38 AM

I thought about this for awhile and wasn't going to post at first, but it's still nagging me.

You can't review this movie without addressing the music. The music is so evocative of the time that, along with the clothes, "mellow" ambience of Jack's house, recaptures the zeitgeist of this time and region.

These people were obliviously barrelling through their lives with previous blood-family fragmentation and look to put the pieces back with a surrogate family of suburban outcasts, people who had skills separate from the zombies. So they put their own carnivalesque parade on display and damn the opinions of others. Listen to the very last song in the credits. It's like the end of a carnival/circus. Every once in a while, when life rears its ugly head, they can't deal and retreat back into their "family".

Also, notice the tracking shot on Wahlberg's face during "Jesse's Girl". What's going on in his head during that particular verse? Epiphany? End of his tether? Spun out from his dream that turned into a nightmare, going off the rails with the American Illusion of Surface and Soul-Sellers. Vacuous meat-sellers and the logical conclusion of materialism for its own sake.

This movie put P.T. on the map. Cannot be overstated what was accomplished in this film.

Posted by: Recondite at February 7, 2011 12:40 PM

Should have added/appended hedonism at the end (the long way down). He's no different from a debauched libertine during de Sade's age. The only difference is that he has something of a redemption (although the "he" here is not Diggler; it's the dick who is the star).

Posted by: Recondite at February 7, 2011 5:16 PM

To be fair, they called it The King's Speech not The King's Whole Fucking Life. You know, if we're being fair.

Posted by: becks at February 13, 2011 6:01 PM

Or they could have called it "Mundane Events in a Relatively Important White Guy's Life," that doesn't excuse lowering the bar.

If I take a bag of dog poop and sell it as "Shit!," it's still shit at the end of the day.

Posted by: Drew Morton at February 13, 2011 11:24 PM