web
counter
 

Tired and Feathered

By Daniel Carlson | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (105)



black_swan_review.png

Darren Aronofsky is a master at making beautiful films you never want to see again. Part of this has to do with the inherently unpleasant nature of the obsessions and addictions he chronicles: the heroin chase of Requiem for a Dream, the eon-spanning pursuit of doomed love in The Fountain, the thirst for a dying fame in The Wrestler. These are dark and unwelcoming stories, but Aronofsky presents them in such a way that their emotional impact becomes a physical one through an often dazzling use of sound and vision. Think of (respectively) Harry’s infected arm, Tomas’ physical martyrdom, or Randy the Ram’s gruesome flagellations. These moments aren’t observations by a filmmaker but inflictions upon an audience. Yet even though none of Aronofsky’s films could remotely be called fun, the ones that worked married the director’s fondness for skin-crawling discomfort with a commitment to telling a story populated by rounded characters. The pain only matters if it’s being felt by someone real, which is why, for instance, Tomas remains a caricature cobbled from rough ideas while Harry and Randy feel like genuine, breakable people. Black Swan, Aronofsky’s latest, feels like it’s meant to be a companion to Wrestler, in that it also deals with the relentless physical strain performers put on their bodies as well as the lengths someone will go to in order to achieve their dream, a theme common to the director’s works. But it feels closer to Fountain in its use of broad, messy strokes that rely too heavily on melodrama. That Aronofsky’s films are often trials to watch doesn’t necessarily rob them of their value; it’s only when he fails to live up to his promise, as he does here, that the destination isn’t worth the journey.

The film’s defining aesthetic is Aronofsky’s favorite: mounting dread mixed with the fear of physical injury. Cinematographer Matthew Libatque keeps the camera nervously and tightly fluttering around Nina Sayers (Natalie Portman), an emotionally fragile ballerina in New York, to constantly highlight her mental state, while sound mixer Ken Ishii and sound editor Craig Henighan make things truly teeth-grinding with a focus on the gristly sounds of knuckles popping, tendons stretching, and toes gently tapping across the stage. The soundtrack is alight with mechanical groans and a twisted devotion to physicality that feels like you’re grinding your teeth. When Nina experiences the first of many injuries — a cracked toenail — it’s only the beginning of Aronofsky’s visual and aural onslaught. Nina’s on edge when the film begins: after years of dancing ballet but never rising to a lead role, she finally gets a shot when Thomas (Vincent Cassel), the head her company, casts her as the lead in their upcoming production of Swan Lake. The role is a dual one, requiring Nina to portray both the White Swan, a woman who was turned into a bird, and her evil twin the Black Swan, who seduces the White Swan’s lover, sending the White Swan into a spiral of depression until she throws herself off a cliff and dies. (Cursory research reveals this to be a pretty loose interpretation of the actual Swan Lake plot, but such are the needs of Aronofsky’s narrative.) Nina’s got the White Swan moves down pat — she’s precise, nervous, and constantly afraid of pretty much everything — but the Black Swan’s vibe is better captured by Lily (Mila Kunis), a new dancer who has the grace and adaptability that eludes Nina. The film plays out as a kind of meta version of the ballet within it, as Nina competes with Lily for status, success, and the respect and possible affection of Thomas.

That’s a remarkably simplified version of what happens though, stripped of the film’s exploration of Nina’s crumbling sanity as well as her hallucinations and possible dementia. She sees other women that resemble her on the street; she imagines that Lily’s face turns into hers on occasion; she develops a rash across her shoulder blade. Her personality is splintering, and she progressively finds herself torn between the slight woman she’s always been and the darker person she’s driven to be by her director and her desires. She’s also physically falling apart, suffering from bloody fingernails and other ailments that are as gruesome as they are fleeting: Nina will suffer some horrible break only to glance again and see that she’s unharmed. She’s an unreliable anchor for the story, and as a result, Aronfsky’s third-act leap from psychosis into full-on metaphysical manipulation feels phony and cold. Nina’s a cipher, a depiction of a good girl going bad who evokes sympathy in the moment but never feels like anything other than a thinly sketched version of a person. This is not entirely accidental. Aronofsky’s working in grand gestures here, loading the frames with black-white contrasts and giving the characters subtext as text. (The creepiest line from the screenplay by Mark Heyman, Andres Heinz, and John McLaughlin is probably Nina’s tearful “He picked me, Mommy” as she tells her mother about getting the lead in the show, delivering the line with a weary relief that hints at all manner of daddy issues left to fester on their own.) Like the ballet within, the film is meant to be much larger than life, emphasizing epic visuals instead of a coherent story. Yet as a result, the final product only works in fits and starts — a conversation here, a look there — and never comes together as a whole. Aronofsky’s made a film about a nervous breakdown but cast himself as the victim instead of the omniscient observer, and he’s content never bothering to make heads or tails of the delusions. They simply are.

For her part, though, Portman is captivating in the same way a wounded animal is, inspiring a sense of troubled curiosity about its survival. Already a small woman (she stands 5’3”), she lost 20 pounds to play Nina, and the close-ups of her skeletal frame are less than pleasant. She creates a skittish, believable portrait of a woman falling increasingly over the edge of sanity, but the tragedy of her portrayal is that it’s within a film so enamored of its own empty theatricality that it often overrides the actors. She’s a player moved around a stage, not a person. Kunis is good, too: this kind of breezy, sexually adventurous woman is right in her wheelhouse, and the best she’s been since Forgetting Sarah Marshall, though it’s also the darkest role she’s ever inhabited (save for the questionable American Psycho 2). Yet so much of the eerie nature of her relationship with Nina winds up being nothing more than a projection, a blast of smoke, that it’s as if she never existed.

Aronofsky gets into some interesting territory exploring the duality of performers and the torturous rituals they undergo to achieve something transitory, but he never quite makes it work. Nina’s tenuous grasp on reality leads to some fascinating twists and truly stunning visuals during the eventual performance of the ballet, but that’s ultimately all they are: pictures divorced from emotion, drawn merely to please a distant creator. The increasingly brutal punishments visited upon Nina feel not like a price being paid for art but like dull torture visited on someone for no other reason than that she was standing nearby. The director’s earlier works are difficult to watch (let alone revisit) for the powerful emotional toll they exact on the viewer, but Black Swan earns the same fate for a far less satisfying reason: it’s just not worth it.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a member of the Houston Film Critics Society and the Online Film Critics Society. He’s also a TV blogger for the Houston Press. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba's 4th Annual (Sh)it List | "The Fighter" Review | It Doesn't Take A Big Man To Knock Somebody Down, Just A Little Courage To Lift Him Off The Ground









Comments

I read the revised script and what struck me was that the story was remarkably simple and FREAKY AS FUCK, so I'm definitely watching this one. AND Burlesque.

Yes, I mean it.

Posted by: THE Sofía at December 2, 2010 2:33 PM

My God Dan, great review. Reading your evaluation of a movie is like watching a pretty girl suck the meat off a chicken bone.

Posted by: superasente at December 2, 2010 2:35 PM

You broke my heart, Carlson! I'm going to see this anyway, with a friend who used to be a ballerina. I'm interested to hear her take on the film.

Posted by: Ginger at December 2, 2010 2:36 PM

My mom's been telling me she wants me to see this with her. She insists she "know[s] what it's about," but I'm really not sure she does. (I'm not sure I do, either, but I at least know this is not going to be about the beauty of ballet.)

Posted by: Todd at December 2, 2010 2:50 PM

@Todd,

Just so long as you are comfortable sitting next to your Mom watching the lesbian sex scenes and the masturbation scenes I don't see a problem.

Posted by: Yossarian at December 2, 2010 2:56 PM

This is why I like Pajiba so much. You can get simple reviews for simple movies, but when someone is challenging, the gang rises to the occasion to tackle it with honesty.

I'll probably still check out Black Swan just because Aronofsky's built that much goodwill with me. And if the worse it can be is another Fountain, I'll be fine. I love The Fountain.

Posted by: Fredo at December 2, 2010 2:57 PM

I'll probably be seeing this regardless as well but I'm kind of disappointed that it might not be as functional as it seems it should be. If that makes any sense.

Posted by: Paultera at December 2, 2010 3:18 PM

Yossarian: Considering that she punched me in the arm during the strip club scene in Lost in Translation, I'd say lesbian sex is a bit outside our collective boundaries. Thanks for the warning.

Has there been a "movies you regretted seeing with your parents" diversion? If not, there should be.

Posted by: Todd at December 2, 2010 3:19 PM

While I have never been able to revisit Requiem for a Dream, I have no problem with Pi, The Wrestler and especially The Fountain, which is my favorite of his films. I had to purchase a new copy, as my old DVD started to skip.

And while I am disappointed in reading this review, I do have hope that I will enjoy Black Swan, simply because we disagree about Aronofsky's earlier work.

Still, this was a wonderful review to read. Thank you.

Posted by: Scully at December 2, 2010 3:20 PM

Hearing the summary of this movie reminds me of a book I vaguely remember reading about a ballerina who goes a little nuts during a production a production of Swan Lake. I read it as a kid so it's something that would have come out before 1980. Does this ring a bell with anyone?

Posted by: Abby at December 2, 2010 3:22 PM

It seems to me DA could upgrade in the DP dept.

Posted by: cakle at December 2, 2010 3:24 PM

Excellent review. I'll definitely be seeing this.

Posted by: Jadine at December 2, 2010 3:26 PM

I never understood what the big deal was about one balerina playing both the white and black swans. I always thought it would make more sense to split the part between two balerinas. That way two dancers get to star and show off their best stuff, and not have to deal with costume changes.

Posted by: BWeaves at December 2, 2010 3:33 PM

As a former ballerina, I am dying to see this, despite the fact that I think I'll probably agree with the review whole-heartedly.

The problem is I feel like this should really be seen on the big screen but I live in NYC and fear the bedbugs!

Posted by: rhombus at December 2, 2010 3:39 PM

I've really been looking forward to seeing this film, a fact which I can attribute entirely to the aggressiveness of the publicity it has received. I wonder, however, whether the film is able to achieve more than that which the number of trailers and interviews (that I have been physically unable restrain myself from watching) have already revealed. I certainly hope so. I guess it's my own damned fault for being too greedy for the latest romp in 'Nofsky land.

And another thing! Huzzah for The Fountain love! I feel it often receives a great deal of trash talk on this site and...it...makes...Hulk smash. While the plot itself is...well, mer, the visual aesthetics have this incredible ability to evoke heartbreak and longing (and all the gobbledegoo of hardcore feelings) in such a specific way that it's like the 'Nof is reaching into your heart with a glove made of broken glass and knife-shaped dildos to force you to remember what loss (not just of love) truly feels like. Yeah, so...there's that.

Posted by: beet salad at December 2, 2010 3:47 PM

Wonderful review, Daniel. A bit disappointing, but I'll try and catch this nonetheless. I'm interested in Natalie's performance.

Posted by: KP at December 2, 2010 3:53 PM

Todd - I actually watched Requiem with my mom and (at the time) newish stepfather. So. very.uncomfortable.

Posted by: rubynicole at December 2, 2010 3:55 PM

I have never and will never see Requiem for a Dream simply because it fucked my sister's shit up in a big ugly way...then my little brother told me never to see it, and he knows me and how I can get so...no. BUT I loved Pi even though it messed with me and was cringeworthy and Cronenberg-esque.

That's the factor...the Cronenberg Factor. Aronofsky seems to have a touch of the Cronenberg! So I'll see this...ESPECIALLY beacuse it sounds like it doesn't quite pass muster. If you had said it was as disturbing as Requiem I'd have taken a pass.

So I'll see it bcz it doesn't sound that good. I wonder if that makes any sense at all.

Posted by: klingonfree at December 2, 2010 3:59 PM

klingonfree, it makes sense. Look at it this way, whatever your feelings on the movie or Aronofsky, you know you're not seeing something that's been focused-group and tested to death.

beet salad, my brother is a Philosophy student and he loved The Fountain for the way it depicted various different sets of ideas. Don't ask me which ones. I know I got something else out of it, but that's the point.

Posted by: Fredo at December 2, 2010 4:14 PM

"klingonfree, it makes sense. "

Thanks Fredo. I, uh, don't hear this particular phrase very often.

Posted by: klingonfree at December 2, 2010 4:18 PM

I thought Black Swan was a super-hero movie, drat!

The Fountain - enjoyed, may watch again

Requiem - despised, felt I had been damaged, will never watch again

Posted by: TrickyHD at December 2, 2010 4:36 PM

I think I'm definitely in for this one. I agree with a lot of Carlson's other reviews and, even though he definitely saw some problems with this one, I'm even more intrigued by it. Sort of jolie-laide, I guess.

I wonder how many people are going to go into this expecting just a movie about ballet? It reminds me of that time my sweet ballerina friend called me up a few years ago, traumatized, after watching Suspiria. I . . . did try to warn her.

Posted by: Cherry at December 2, 2010 4:38 PM

I have every intention of seeing this as I knew it would play like this for many people. It's an exploration of a nervous breakdown but not a portrait of a person having a breakdown. It is style, tone, and concept. Considering this is not a new well that Aronofsky dug (there are many plot-heavy theater/film/music/ballet/art darling falls to pieces films in horror and drama), I'm not surprised he tried a different way of telling the narrative.

Posted by: Robert at December 2, 2010 4:43 PM

I always get so excited when Pajiba breaks out The Carlson for reviews like these. I am never disappointed.

I must say I am disappointed in the the movie, but we'll see it anyway. Just not in the theatre. I say that all high and mighty, but let's be honest, we see virtually nothing in the theatre. We seem to get to all of the Harry Potters, but other than that it's highly unlikely.

I haven't seen Requiem for a Dream based on comments from a thread right here on Pajiba.

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at December 2, 2010 5:07 PM

I thought the The Fountain was the most enjoyable of his works, so I think I will be down for this

Bweaves To answer your question about splitting the role, if memory serves me correctly in the story the "black swan", Odile, does magic to make herself look exactly like the "white swan", Odette and thus dupes the unsuspecting prince at a huge ball where he was supposed to leave to be with the white swan in order to help her turn back into a real princess. Thus why it is played by the same woman - they are supposed to look identical.

As a larger psychological portait I think it is supposed to represent two aspects of the same woman - the virgin/whore, good girl/sexual woman dichotomy that seems to be played up in this film as well.

Posted by: ninetwenteetoo at December 2, 2010 5:22 PM

Rhombus, don't be lame. Embrace the dirtiness of NYC (um, and the fact that you live in a city where this movie will actually be playing)

Besides, everyone who would spread bedbugs to a movie theater most likely takes the subway. And that doesn't stop you from taking the subway, does it?

Please tell me it doesn't. If it does, well then, the bedbugs have won.

Posted by: Sara Tonin at December 2, 2010 5:41 PM

Oh, Requiem for a Dream is a movie that evokes in me the same thing as the movie Happiness. Amazing movie, glad I watched it, never want to watch it again. Except when I wonder if it really was as powerful (read: painful/traumatizing) as I remember. And then I recall how few movies I consider traumatizing...

Posted by: Sara Tonin at December 2, 2010 5:46 PM

if they would only play requiem for a dream for students in middleschools, drug cartels would go belly up.

I'm terribly in love with aronofsky's film making and have been since Pi. I think the Fountain is one of the greatest films ever made and transcends anything you would call 'watching a movie'.

and i am still having trouble summoning excitement for this movie. maybe it's that I don't like portman or kunis. maybe it's the ballet angle.

i'm a sucker for descent into madness stories--I usually relate quite vividly, can't figure out why i haven't been counting down the days for this.

i will be at the box office, one, because his movies cry out for the big screen, and also to make sure my democratic dollar casts its vote for aronofsky.

Posted by: idleprimate at December 2, 2010 6:09 PM

I could scarcely believe the on-screen description given to "Requiem" by DirecTV: "Brooklynites want to better their lives."

I think the final 15 or so minutes of that movie are among the most harrowing ever committed to film. After a long pummeling, it finishes you off with that series of gut punches. I thought I'd never watch it again after the first viewing, but then I watched it 3 or 4 times in the span of one month.

Posted by: growler at December 2, 2010 7:03 PM

I read an interview with Aronofsky where he said that originally Black Swan and The Wrestler were the same movie (with Nina Sayers being The Wrestler's daughter), but it was too much story for one movie so he split it in two. So it would make sense that they feel like companion pieces.

Anyway, I saw this movie a couple months ago at the Chicago International Film Festival and again earlier this week at a screening, and I completely loved it, though I am probably a bit biased because I've been pretty much obsessed with Darren Aronofsky for the past decade.

Posted by: Stephanie at December 2, 2010 8:42 PM

devil's advocate. bitchy people.

Posted by: John at December 2, 2010 9:11 PM

I read an interview with Aronofsky where he said that originally Black Swan and The Wrestler were the same movie (with Nina Sayers being The Wrestler's daughter), but it was too much story for one movie so he split it in two. So it would make sense that they feel like companion pieces.

Whoa. That would have been one fucked up movie. And while I can certainly see the common themes, I have a hard time imagining moving from wrestling to ballet - though maybe that was the point. In wrestling, we know that the barbed wire has to hurt, that's part of what we're paying to see. In ballet, the pain is every bit as real, often much more intense, but when it's done right, we see none of that - it looks absolutely effortless. Hmmm....

Come to think of it, the main problem with The Black Wrestling Swan as a single film is that it would just be too incredibly depressing for words. Just when you recover from the end of The Wrestler, the daughter starts going insane. GAH.

I kind of love how many people are praising the review, and then saying they are going to see the movie. That's what a good review does - it doesn't just say "see it/avoid it" - it tells you WHY the reviewer thinks the movie fails, so that you can see if that is something that would present a problem for you. I can absolutely understand that Natalie Portman's character remains a cypher, which robs some scenes of their impact, but I can also see that this might still be a really interesting film. Hmmmm.

Posted by: Edith at December 3, 2010 1:27 AM

Thank you for your review. It is very interestin­g to get your perspectiv­e.

Posted by: Susan at December 3, 2010 8:05 AM

Requiem harmed me for years. My husband loves it, don't know why and made me watch it. Had to watch Spongebob Squarepants right after to remember that life could be silly again.
I have been dying to see this and reading this riveting review makes me look forward to it even more. I actually would prefer it not to scar me for life.
I am hoping the more I see of Mila on film I can forget her as Meg. That is all I see sometimes.

Posted by: daria at December 3, 2010 10:17 AM

As a former ballerina, I am dying to see this, despite the fact that I think I'll probably agree with the review whole-heartedly.

Doesn't it bother you that she lacks any dancing talent and is as graceful as a flat footed goose? It bothers me and I'm NOT a former ballerina.

Posted by: Patricia at December 3, 2010 12:06 PM

Sara Tonin In that case it's the sexual predators who have won, because they are the reason I no longer take the subway. When they were just flashers it was kind of funny, but when they started getting physical it was time to put on my walking boots. I still take it when I have to, but don't like to...

But no bedbugs on the subway, they require cushion and darkness. They have shown up at Abercrombie and Fitch and Victoria's Secret too, apparently. Fucking freeloaders.

Posted by: rhombus at December 3, 2010 2:49 PM

And Patricia Natalie Portman's mere existence bothers me. I really think it was foolish to cast anyone who didn't have a ballet background in this. There is just no way you can fool real dancers with one year's work, and the extent that it will mess your body up is unfair to do to someone. I mean, my body is certainly messed up from ballet and always will be (and my head even more so). I think it's pretty wrong to put someone's body through all that in a year. It's bound to cause problems.

The thing that bothered me most was that she worked out five hours a day and lost 20 pounds to play this. To do ballet for three hours a day and swim for two hours and to LOSE 20 pounds is incredibly messed up. She probably gained about 12-15 pounds of muscle from the combined workouts. While she doesn't look horrible to me, and her weight is probably below normal but not technically in the anorexic range, I would doubt she didn't do some heart damage. And as much as I think she's a pompous ass, I don't really wish that on anyone. It's no fun.

But yeah, they should have cast a dancer. It's rare but there are people who can do both well.

Posted by: rhombus at December 3, 2010 3:02 PM

Rhombus: I hear you loud and clear on those critters. I have read that you actually can pick them up from the wooden benches in stations, so I won't sit on them. I'm typically not a paranoid person, but those things terrify me in that once you've got 'em, you've got 'em.

I think that Natalie Portman actually used to dance. Doesn't mean she has acting talent (so far as I'm concerned, she has little), but I read that in the New Yorker's review (which was pretty tepid).

Posted by: samantha t at December 3, 2010 3:29 PM

Why, oh why, is this movie only playing on one screen in the Chicago area?! This seems very dumbstupid to me.

Posted by: Scully at December 3, 2010 4:55 PM

...and whenever Mia speaks, all I hear is Meg Griffin...

Posted by: litmus0001 at December 3, 2010 5:40 PM

So I'm the only human being who has watched Requiem more than once? Because I have. I will admit to skipping through what Jennifer Connelly had to do, holy hell. Seen that once, never need to see it again.

But Ellen Burstyn as Sara Goldfarb, SHIT. That is some amazing fucking acting right there. Every big name actor who just phones their shit in collecting a paycheck should be forced to watch her in this flick as many times as it takes to get it to sink in that they are no good, that THIS is acting.

And I don't like Natalie Portman. She brings back bad memories of those newer Star Wars flicks, ug and horf.

BUT. I watched the trailer for this and was totally fucking intrigued. I rarely ever see things in the theater and I think Mr. Snuggie and I have a date. I don't even care if Aronofsky doesn't quite pull it off. Sounds and looks like there are several other factors worth the ticket price alone (Barbara Hershey, for instance).

Absolutely fantastic review, Dan.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at December 3, 2010 6:00 PM

Yeah, does anyone know if this is going to get a wider release at all? Because I would LOVE to see it big-screen style, and it's playing in NYC, but I'll be honest: It's a pain in my ass to go into the city. I just don't have the time to do that.

Oh, and Mrs. Snugglesworth, I've got Requiem on DVD and watch it frequently. I love that movie SO HARD. And Ellen Burstyn deserved the hell out of that Oscar (and Connelly, Leto, and Wayans were amazing as well).

Posted by: Anna von Beav at December 3, 2010 6:52 PM

So then, this is Showgirls in pointe shoes, right?

Posted by: Humbert at December 3, 2010 7:14 PM

Scully - it's playing at 2 theaters! (3 if you include Evanston)

Posted by: nosio at December 3, 2010 7:50 PM

Requiem blew me away.
The Fountain, the same. I really loved it.
Neither are perfect, ok, but there something in his films that make me watch. His work is compelling. I didn't expect this one to be his best, from the trailers, but I still want to see it. I can't quit you, Aronofsky. Well, not yet, anyway.

Posted by: Chickaboom at December 3, 2010 9:36 PM

Hmmmmmm.....
Scenes of lesbian sex and masturbation vs my irrational hatred of breaking toenails.
Tough call.

Posted by: Odnon. at December 4, 2010 2:17 AM

I'm glad to see Natalie Portman made a movie she actually cares about, her perform- ances in the Star Wars prequels were the least I've ever seen an actor care about a role, but if you're willing to go through this for a role, you have to care.

I wonder if Androvski will be as factually correct as he was in The Wrestler. Everything in that movie was true, especially the stuff about the Necro Butcher, who, sadly enough, is an actual wrestler.

Posted by: Devil Child at December 5, 2010 3:30 AM

I completely believe that this would be a companion piece to The Wrestler, ballet and wrestling have so much in common. Incredibly short careers, immense pain, a great sense of epicness, everyone wears tights, one's male dominated, one's female dominated, many people automatically mock the audience and performers, people who used to sell out places go on to have no clue what to do with their lives, and nobody seems to take the pain they suffer seriously.

Do you realize how many people still believe that wrestlers use fake blood?

Posted by: Devil Child at December 5, 2010 3:36 AM

This movie was better when it was called Perfect Blue.

Posted by: twig at December 5, 2010 4:01 PM

... and I realize that was pithy but unnecessary, because I do like Aranofsky a great deal as a director and The Fountain is one of my more favorite movies.

I don't know why this one didn't click. I can't tell if it's because of some of the issues raised by the review or simply because the preview - like always - gives away far too much of the film.

Either way, it just wasn't exceptional, though it sure was a visceral look at just how far dancers push themselves for their art. The FX guys deserve full marks for those bone-popping sounds.

Posted by: twig at December 5, 2010 4:05 PM

Damn. When I thought this was mostly a psychological thing, I was totally pumped about this movie.

But as a former ballerina who had a nearly-crippling injury at the age of eighteen (I can walk, but I'll never run or dance again), I don't think I can handle scenes of ballet-related injury worse than blisters and sprained ankles.

Posted by: That Girl at December 5, 2010 10:45 PM

"Darren Aronofsky is a master at making beautiful films you never want to see again... These moments aren’t observations by a filmmaker but inflictions upon an audience."

Beautifully put.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at December 6, 2010 1:11 AM

her performances in the Star Wars prequels were the least I've ever seen an actor care about a role

George Lucas wouldn't allow her to care about her performances in those. I heard somewhere that he never did more than three takes, because he just didn't give a shit about the acting and considered post-production to be where he really "made" the movies.

Posted by: Todd at December 6, 2010 9:43 AM

I want to see this badly, but it's not playing near me. Boo. I loved The Fountain and Pi. I was not fully sold on the Wrestler. I hated Requiem with a passion (not that it was a bad film, I just hated it). It absolutely traumatized me to the point where I went into a little bit of a depression for weeks afterward (I am by no means a depressed person naturally, I just felt scarred). It was just too, too much. So if this film is a little less Requiem and a little more Fountain, I'm glad for it. I don't really feel like huddling in a corner while sobbing and banging my head against the wall after the credits roll.

Posted by: tt_marie at December 6, 2010 4:00 PM

I saw this with my 16-year-old daughter. She was blown away, and I found it compelling but the whole time I kept thinking it was a ballet-themed version of Fight Club.

Posted by: Temeraria at December 8, 2010 7:50 AM

rhombus, the only problem with casting a dancer in a lead role in a movie about dance is that they just. Can't. Act. Especially on the big screen.

Exhibit A: Leslie Browne and Mikhail Baryshnikov in The Turning Point
Exhibit B: Amanda Schull and Ethan Stiefel in Center Stage
Exhixit C: Everyone in the Step Up movies

I love the dancing in all of them, but I always fast-forward through any speaking parts. My guess is that acting is a pretty big part of this movie, and that Aronofsky was willing to sacrifice some dance quality for the acting part.

I actually think Portman's a decent actress in the right role. Ahh, yes, that's why he picked her.

Posted by: Jelinas at December 8, 2010 8:56 AM

So...this isn't a remake of the Tyrone Power-Maureen O'Hara movie?

Posted by: KateNonymous at December 8, 2010 3:29 PM

So…is this being released to more theaters this weekend? Because I have yet to watch it. I drove to one of the 3 theaters in the Chicago area to see it, where it was playing on 1 screen and since there was no parking, I arrived 20 minutes too late. And hell if I was going to wait 2+ hours for the next showing. (Also, it was past my bedtime.)

I love Aronofsky, and would love to support his work, but 3 theaters in Chicago?!! CHICAGO?! You’d think this movie would have a bigger release since it was promoted extensively.

Posted by: Scully at December 10, 2010 10:01 AM

This film is nothing short of extraordinary. The plot is inventive for what it turns out to be (if not the story it tells) and the performances are great across the board. This is, without a doubt, my favorite Aronofsky picture and falls just short of All About Eve in the lengthy list of life in live performance films I've seen. It's smart, it's suspenseful, it's tragic, and it's beautifully crafted on every level. It's a shame that some people loose themselves in Portman's performance and don't take notice of everything else happening around her. She's the focal point but not even close to the entire film.

Posted by: Robert at December 10, 2010 3:04 PM

So I FINALLY got to see this last night and I loved it! The ending was a bit disappointing. But I felt that considering the build up, Natalie Portman's performance and the music more than made up for the ending.

Barbara Hershey was fantastic. Vincent Cassel was great. And for the very fist time I enjoyed Mila Kunis.

Also: Clint Mansell, wow. Just wow.

Posted by: Scully at December 11, 2010 2:52 PM

This movie is fantastic. Top 5 of the year for sure. Scarier than I though it would be and still amazing. Aronofsky does a good job of making you think it's gonna end one way, but ending it differently.

Posted by: Larold at December 11, 2010 11:50 PM

This is a great review and really does an excellent job of summing up how I felt about it. When it was over I told my friend that I thought it was very interesting and the performances were great, but I can't imagine watching it again. I have no desire to ever see it again. It was visually stunning, but it just felt like something was missing to me.

Christ was Cassell creepy.

Posted by: Katie at December 13, 2010 8:08 PM

This review is wrong. The Black Swan was totally captivating. I mean "totally" as in my entire being was totally captivated by this experience of being inside a neurotic perfectionist from start to finish. The filmmaking surrounding the performance worked hand-in-hand to make me feel trapped inside Natalie Portman's head. It was a very satisfying film experience.

Posted by: John G. at December 14, 2010 2:57 PM

This ballerina is going to see it, just to see if Mila Kunis pulls it off as a dancer.

Posted by: kristin at December 14, 2010 9:23 PM

I completely disagree with the review. This movie has a lot to do with the transformation of girl to woman- and the paradoxes of duality that are unique to that particular transition. You don't understand the symbolism of the skin picking, or the character frame of reference struggling to free herself from her critical and over bearing mother. Nina went from captive to captivating....which is what the movie will do to anyone who can understand the mother/ daughter- girl/woman- virgin/whore backdrop.

Posted by: loudogg at December 15, 2010 6:16 AM

I sorta liked it, and thought Portman acted her ass off. But it was missing A LOT in plot and character motivation. So it felt underwritten and empty to me. Lovely, and empty. Focusing on whether it should have had a real dancer in the lead role seems to be beside the point when the script still needed so much work.

Posted by: Chickaboom at December 17, 2010 11:35 AM

I'm not sure quite what our esteemed reviewer was smoking when he saw this, but I couldn't disagree with him more. The movie was brilliant, the acting was AB-SO-LUTE-LY breathtaking, and the tension this movie achieved was to be applauded. I left the movie sick to my stomach but quite aware that I'd just been in the presence of greatness.

Any movie that can put to actual good use the acting talents of Winona Ryder, Natalie Portman, Barbara Hershey, AND Mila Kunis is to be applauded. The score (obviously) was brilliant, as were the sound mixing, make up, and costuming.

All in all, I was more than happy to have spent money to see a movie like this.

Posted by: The Pink Hulk at December 18, 2010 6:58 PM

Pink Hulk:Well said. Just saw it and it is still resonating. Not many movies leave me with that experience.

Posted by: QueBarbara at December 18, 2010 8:16 PM

Saw it, worth it, I've completely re-assessed Natalie Portman. And damn Barbara Hershey was amazing. Mr. Snuggie loved it. I'm going to probably see it twice in the theater--I'm going with another friend. That'll be worth it, too.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at December 19, 2010 1:36 AM

I went and saw it tonight and loved it. Still not sure what I went and saw exactly, but was mesmerized the entire time.

Posted by: MyySharona at December 19, 2010 4:25 AM

I loved it, I just watched it and I'm still a little shaken by this beautiful film. People go watch it for yourself and make your own decision. I think this review was too negative.

Posted by: Malware at December 20, 2010 5:35 AM

I saw this movie and I definitely had mixed feelings. I think it had an amazing plot line, wonderful actors and some beautiful scenes, however I think they took the gruesome, disturbing graphics too far. In some cases they were necessary and served a definite purpose. Other times, I think Aronofsky was depending too much on shock value. The physical injuries started out as subtle and more realistic. Towards the end, they were unnecessary, disgusting, and way over the top. And I am not a squeamish person; stuff like that usually doesn't affect me. However, after watching this, I was disgusted and appalled. I have no desire to ever see this movie again or anything else by Aronofsky. I just felt like I was on a bad trip. A REALLY bad trip.

Posted by: CK707 at December 20, 2010 8:56 AM

Great review, even though I completely disgree that the trip is not worth it. Its about an experience, and that is a wonder to behold, supported by artfulness and some brilliant acting. I would urge people to go see for themselves, though if you're seeking simply "enjoyment", probably Aronofsky's films as a whole aren't your cup of tea.

Posted by: Eric at December 21, 2010 9:07 PM

As usual, I must disagree with Daniel's review. I just saw Black Swan and I thought it was amazing -- without doubt one of the best movies I've seen these last few years. And I'll most certainly watch it again.

Posted by: Thijs at December 22, 2010 3:32 AM

Im pretty certain that the debate about this movie, and the visceral reactions people are having to it, mean its at least a real piece of art, and not just "Some movie"

Love it, hate it, art makes you react.


I loved it. The whole way home from the theater I was totally paranoid.

And... the people who go see it for the ballet won't be totally disappointed either. While I thought Portman could use maybe a little more... flow? I suppose... she was rather stiff... it went with the character and the plot, and quite frankly I was impressed with the amount of technique she learned. To progress THAT far in a year... is more than I progressed in a 22 year old lifetime. Although I agree- the weight loss was distressing, and she probably didn't do her body any favors getting that technique. Natalie was nearly unrecognizable, and had that prematurely aged look ballerinas get at higher levels where the pressure is so huge to be tiny. Kunis... was skinny but I hardly think she looked as disturbing as natalie.

Posted by: Michelle at December 23, 2010 2:14 AM

Sorry-your review does very little justice to the film. Brilliant directing, brilliant script, brilliant acting, especially by Portman. Any film that stays with me days after watching it is an 'A' in my books. The mark was squarely hit.

Posted by: Tedward at December 23, 2010 6:22 PM

Don't go see this with your mother, or anyone you don't feel comfortable watching awkward masturbation with. The movie was weird, and nothing really happened...she just imagined it or hallucinated it. The whole time I just felt awkward...the theater was silent because I think everyone felt the same way.

Posted by: meme at December 23, 2010 6:34 PM

This movie was overrated, empty and lacked a cohesive narrative. It was a series of creepily sorta-pretty pictures shown via PowerPoint slide show with some music behind it.

Abysmally bad. The movie sucked.

Posted by: Steve Spiel at December 23, 2010 6:45 PM

"art makes you react"

If this is the best that they can do to make you eat this schlock, then you know the movie is bad.
"You don't get it" is usually what people say when they don't get how bad their beloved (f)art piece is.

You know what else makes you react? Someone sh1tting on your bed unexpectedly. I'm sure you'd react. Doesn't make it art.

Posted by: Jane Hamsher at December 23, 2010 6:48 PM

I think this reviewer missed the point of this film completely. loudogg is right on the money. This movie is all about the insanity of the feminine ideal and the destructive nature of the virgin/whore dichotomy.

You can't have a meaningful discussion about this film without talking about perfection. Nina's progressive breakdown was the result of her attempt to embody the paradox of the feminine ideal. It was only when she had destroyed herself that she could be, finally and at long last, perfect.

I think this movie deserves a lot more credit all around.

Posted by: Cherry at December 23, 2010 9:29 PM

the bottom line. if you have to ask people what the ending meant or what exactly was going on, then the director has failed.

Posted by: archer at December 24, 2010 6:51 PM

This move was so well done. Yes, you can analyze every aspect of it and say the characters were not as well developed as you would like, or that the actors were not the best dancers ever. This could be the case, but I felt the more important part of the story was her transformation. It was done so well. The symbolism may be obvious, but it doesn't make it not captivating. It was a very good film, one of my favorites. And Natalie Portman did a wonderful job! (As well as Mina Kunis). I LOVE this movie, every part, except I could do without the blood.... made me queazy.

Posted by: Panic Attack at December 26, 2010 12:05 AM

So many people here have already said what I would... along the lines of loudogg. Basically Dan, you are not doing the film justice by writing this review. I don;t believe you could possibly understand the symbolism or character if you really believe anything was missing. The whole point was that she was empty, cold, virginal, stressed, delusional, bolemic, and mentally unhinged. She didnt know how to interact with her peers and had daddy issues (that was a good point you made). If you felt something was missing, there is a reason. Aronovsky purposefully made us aware of her emptiness through her lack of connection to others. Don't discount Nina's visions of Mila Kunis' character (Lily) either. They were necessary to establish Nina as a paranoid schizophrenic.
Through her transformation to her dual persona, the black swan, she embodies a more visceral woman while simultaneously suffering more and more from her psychosis and other medical conditions (bolemia, delusions, self mutalation, etc.). It would not have made sense for Nina to actually kill Lily, since Lily was not the person keeping her from realizing her other self. Nina was her own enemy. Her transformation to the black swan is completed in the final scene as she kills off the white swan --- herself. That was the perfect ending.
Frankly, this kind of review shouldn't be published Dan. Someone without vision and understanding should not stand on the shoulders of master craftmen and belittle their work.
Back to the Movie. It is hands down one of the best films ever made. Bravo to all involved, especially the leading 3 (portman, kunis, and cassell), the music director, cinematographer, and most especially Aronovsky.

Posted by: Aaron at December 26, 2010 1:38 AM

Aaron is dead on. The movie was brilliant. Nuff said.

Posted by: Snorglord at December 26, 2010 7:18 AM

I saw Black Swan last night with my son. OMG! I never thought I's say a movie was too intense, but that describes it. It was too single minded and the camera was often too close to the subject-- kind of made you seasick. So, without dimension, and not to mention the disturbing sexual scenes, we watched an hours worth and then walked out.

Posted by: Robert Standridge at December 26, 2010 1:31 PM

I side with the reviewer. There are aspects of the film that I very much like -- the physicality and of the dance life; the glances and jealousies and bitchiness of the dancers; Portman's performance; and the portrayal of New York in all its grit and glory, the subway and theater and parties.

And I liked how Kunis's character is a tease, what seems to be real ends up being in Portman's mind.

But ... ah, a little tiny bit of Goth and the camera shrieking "horror" with dramatic jerky shots and faux Hitchcock go a long, long ways. And this was a whole lot bit.

The more I got slugged in the head, the more bored I became.

Posted by: Mark McKenzie at December 27, 2010 9:41 AM

I agree with the review as well. This film just left me cold and I couldn't feel anything for the lead character, much less care about her struggles. For that, the film falters. However, it's not a total failure since the acting all-around is superb, the visuals are striking, and the music is perfected suitable.

It is interesting to read the interpretations on here about the whole madonna/whore-transition from girl to woman-duality of the feminine ideal stuff. I never thought of that while watching the film, but it makes sense. That would give the film a much deeper meaning than a simple critique of obsession and perfectionism, which was my initial impression.

As a side note: I'm surprised so many people could not re-watch "Requiem..."! I immediately wanted to see it again after I first saw it and I've seen it so many times now. "Irreversible" (with Vincent Cassel) on the other hand, that's one I can't seem to bring myself to watch again.

Posted by: Jessica at December 27, 2010 10:43 PM

Aaron, I couldn't agree more. This movie seems to have a fairly strong split opinion though.

Posted by: Mick J at December 29, 2010 3:33 PM

Just saw this film tonight & read this review afterwards.

I was left cold by this film and wanted to see what some reviewers had to say (the ones who weren't gushing over the film).

Portman is great, but her character is so thin emotionally as well as physically...I couldn't feel empathy for her when I tried. More like annoyance.

I almost left after the first 45 min, very slow moving first piece of the film. You constantly want to kick Portman's character in the ass and tell her to pull herself together.

It just gets SO tedious watching her disappoint herself and Tomas over and over and over again...Portman has the same pained expression on her face for the whole almost-two-hours...it's a bit tiresome...you want to yell at the screen, tell the character to consider another career if she can't abandon herself as needed for the Black Swan piece.

Kunis was great...actually, the whole cast was. I was just left feeling lukewarm given the many stellar reviews I'd read & heard beforehand.

I hope you all enjoy it regardless of what I think :)

Posted by: Carina at December 29, 2010 11:47 PM

I needed to watch this movie a second time to truly appreciate it. The first time I saw it, I was too preoccupied with the horrible visuals (meaning the graphic injuries all over the place) and the extremely graphic sex scenes to really take in what else was going on. The second time I saw it, knowing what to expect, I could definitely appreciate the mastery of the movie.
However, I would have to criticize it because of this. If the audience is too busy being terrified of what nasty injury is going to come next to appreciate the rest of the film, the director didn't do a good job. They should be focusing on other things, but with scenes like that, it was nearly impossible for me the first time I saw it. To a point, I completely understood their purpose. But in the later half of the movie it was just nasty.
However, the second time I saw it, I definitely realized how incredible it was. Phenomenal acting, GREAT story line, so much symbolism, etc.

Posted by: Alyson at December 30, 2010 12:52 AM

am pretty sure mot guys want to go see this just for this kiss between Kunis and Portman.

Posted by: MRod at December 30, 2010 2:23 PM

Saw it and LOVED it. I see Daniel's points, but I don't agree with them. However, I absolutely agree with the assessment that this is the kind of movie that is an absolute trial to watch.

I was on knife's edge from the start. Most of the body horror was based in the little injuries that I find particularly icky. From the flooring imagery to the soundtrack to the heartbreaking performances, I was so viscerally unsettled and disturbed by this movie that I was glad when it ended in much the same way I was with Requiem for a Dream: it was a beautiful, heart-wrenching movie that was so well-done as to affect me so much, but holy shit was it ever disturbing.

There are very few movies that really put me in such a awed-yet-horrified place, but this takes the fucking cake.

Posted by: Sassafrass Green at December 31, 2010 2:14 AM

Cannot read this review, having see the movie, without thinking that Mr. Carlson reveals his own psychological or other agenda. The review says so much more about Carlson than the movie. From the first scenes this movie riveting. The story unfolds bit by bit at just the right pace. There is beauty, romance and suspense as we enter a world that lifts us out of our experience. Could it be that the central character's role and Portman's performance was just too much for Mr. Carlson who has evidently led a pretty sheltered life?

Posted by: Judith Logue at January 1, 2011 7:19 PM

I was a bit dissapointed. I will completely admit, I am goddamn jealous as hell of Natalie Portman. I do think it's her beauty that's gotten her all of the places she's gotten (including Harvard, I don't think she'd have gotten in without the fact that she was a beautiful universally revered actress by the nerds) including this movie. She's good here, the best I have ever seen her, but she didn't do very much actual acting in this movie. I just don't get the oscar buzz for her. And Mila was meh too as much as I do like her.

Overall, I watch a lot of horror movies and wasn't super impressed with the way they portrayed dread. Also, the lesbian and masturbation scenes didn't really make any sense. They were put in to draw buzz otherwise I guarantee no one would have seen this movie.

Posted by: stump at January 3, 2011 8:22 AM

Saw this yesterday, it was OK.

Posted by: the new transported man at January 3, 2011 8:34 AM

This is a rare time I disagree with Daniel's review. I think he's unhappy because the trailers built up this movie to be a thriller of a derailing personality. Because of the trailers, I too expected more gruesome physical aspects and more horror. But after discounting the trailers, I am not disappointed in the least with the movie. While The Black Swan is a movie about a derailing personality and physical trials, I think Daniel missed the actual premise: the struggle an artist goes through when wanting it to be "perfect" but at the same time needing to release some of that perfection in order to tap into true passion that makes their art great. That's what the whole movie is about! And it's wonderful! Look at it from that aspect and see that this artistic struggle is what fuels the personality breakdown (because she struggled so much to unleash her passion, she ends up unhinging her mental state to achieve it). As an artist, this really spoke to me and I also loved the paralell stories of her life and the ballet. I was pleased with this movie.

Posted by: staylor at January 4, 2011 5:12 PM

I wish some of you would back off. This review is exceptional, whether you agree with its conclusion or not. I'm quite disturbed to notice how many women project their personal issues as criteria for artistic success. This is a film, not a documentary about ballet. It is primarily poetry. And as such it shamefully childish and at times pretentious. I am appalled that so many women so transparently root for the destruction of innocence as they champion this films tragic morality. Only the ignorant and naive could possibly suggest that nina is progressing as a character. Aronofsky and his writers have sketched such cliche stereotypes for the ballet director and mother I am shocked to discover so many viewers openly praising the plot and describing it as gripping. "center stage" had a better plot than this indulgent "cinema". Does modern feminism really begin and end with everyone being a rebellions fornicator? Is every ambition borne of sadistic parentage and misogeny? The answer is no ladies. This is the usual pseudo intellectual stroke piece for the urban neophyte, and aronfsky proves only that he can statistically torture a willing participant for 1 hour and 20 minutes. I will now state that I did appreciate the 3rd act, rarely accomplished by such a mediocre director, and would recommend this as a study in schizophrenia that maintained its clinical integrity while wallowing in artistic licence. Thank you for your review, and I repeat, ladies especially and gentlemen, grow up.

Posted by: djaz at January 9, 2011 2:20 AM

"Does modern feminism really begin and end with everyone being a rebellions fornicator?"

Nah, it only begins with it. But seriously, this doesn't make sense--she doesn't have sex with anyone in the movie except herself. Lily makes it clear that Nina was only fantasizing about the sex scene that involves the two of them. The movie is partly about a transformation of a sheltered young woman finally breaking out of her girlhood. So, yeah, it's about rebelling against the ways of childhood. It's not just a feminist theme. Plenty of movies/books/plays depict characters that grow out of their childhood, and sexuality is a pretty important part of that period. It just so happens that this character goes batshit during her transition. Personally, I think she fails as a woman but succeeds as an artist. That said, I don't think this is a necessary thing to achieve perfection, but the director likes him some self-destruction.

Anyway, this movie struck a chord with me since I identify with the main character a little. (Of course, I didn't rock the house in Swan Lake and commit suicide, but I always was an unimpressive coward.) I was a prude during my adolescence and only recently has sexuality been a part of my life I'm comfortable with. Does that have to do with being female? I dunno. I think maybe you're focusing too much on the women and feminism thing.

Gods, the scene where Nina danced and grew the wings was just breath-taking for me. I might go back to the theater to see that. Hangnail up to the knuckle not so much.

Posted by: rsizzle at January 9, 2011 7:32 PM

To fans of disturbing cinema: Don't get your hopes up.
The "gruesome" images in this film were mostly limited to bloody fingernails and wone eak murder/suicide, not much else memorable, and I don't think the plot had anything depressing or scary to offer. so, no, judging by the opinions here, your taste has not been accepted into wide release films with overall positive reviews. You are still a freak

Posted by: Allie at January 9, 2011 11:03 PM

THUMBS DOWN. I'VE COMPARED THIS MOVIE TO DR. JEKYLL AND MR. HYDE, THAT IS, IF MR. HYDE WENT MIA. IT WAS SELF-INDULGENT, OVER-RATED AND FOR MY MONEY, A WASTE OF TIME. SURE, NATALIE PORTMAN DESERVES CREDIT FOR LOSING 20 POUNDS AND LEARNING SOME DANCE MOVES, BUT, HER ACTING WAS FLAT. MOST OF THE FILM SHE PLAYED NINA AS THE NAIVE, FRUSTRATED WOMAN THE ROLE REQUIRED, HOWEVER, WHERE WAS THE REDEMPTIVE AGGRESSION OF THE BLACK SWAN? THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN AN ACTING CHALLENGE! IT WAS REDUCED TO A FEW SCENES AT THE END. WASN'T THAT THE WHOLE POINT OF THE FILM? IT FELT LIKE, "OK, WE'RE ALMOST OUT OF MONEY SO LETS WRAP THIS UP"
AND DON'T TRY TO LABEL IT SOPHISTICATED OR ARTSY. PLEASE!! THERE'S NO MORE SOPHISTICATION HERE THAN A SKINFLICK ON CINEMAX. JUST BECAUSE NINA GROWS WINGS ON STAGE AND HER EYES TURN RED DOES NOT MAKE AN ART-HOUSE MASTERPIECE. AND THE TIRED LESBIAN SCENE IS SO GRATUITOUS AND FRANKLY OFFENSIVE. YEP ANOTHER GAY PREDATOR TRYING TO TAKE THE GOOD STRAIGHT TO THE DARK SIDE. BELIEVE ME THIS STORY COULD HAVE BEEN TOLD BEAUTIFULLY. AND NOT ALL OF IT IS BAD. THE MUSIC WAS GOOD AND SOME OF THE DANCE SCENES ARE BELIEVABLE. BUT, SOMEHOW -LETS BLAME SCREENWRITER AND DIRECTOR- IT ALL TURNS INTO BORING CLICHE': RESENTFUL MOTHER PUSHING HER DAUGHTER TO THE BRINK, LESBIAN SEX-SCENE, THE OLDER MAN/YOUNGER WOMEN LOVE TRIANGLE, ETC. CAN ANYONE TELL AN ORIGINAL STORY ANYMORE? BORING! AS FOR PORTMAN, SHE'LL WIN OSCAR FOR "BLACK SWAN" BUT, SHOULD HAVE WON IT FOR "CLOSER."

Posted by: geno at January 11, 2011 10:05 AM

Thank you for this review. Too many critics are easy to praise Aronofsky. And, while I admire his attempt to bring interesting visual style to main stream cinemas, his lack of storytelling ability is really distracting.

This film could have been great (as the final 15 minutes were) if it did not rely on heavy symbolism (HER LEGS INVERTING = BAD VISUAL EFFECT) and the characters actually felt as if they had a tangible motivation. When will he learn that it is not enough to work with broad themes and character sketches??

It was, as most of his films are, frustrating to watch.

Posted by: Rachel at January 12, 2011 12:46 PM

This is undoubtedly the WORSE movie I have ever seen. Four of us walked out during the lesbian scene (we should have left much earlier). If you are into porn, this is your movie. If you're into decent entertainment, stay away.

Posted by: george at January 15, 2011 4:34 PM

hahahahaha we watched this last night at home on an academy 'for your consideration' freebie..wow,price was right but saps are paying $14 at the theater!? somethings i just adored, tho....i loved babs badmama hershey channeling piper laurie in 'carrie', laughed out loud when lil scarf n barf beanpole nat kept calling ralph on the big white phone, loved watching her growing feathers from her skinny lil bony bod, mutilate her creepy cuticles, vowed to never in my life eat half a grapefruit and a fkn poached egg for a meal,made a mental note to watch cassel in 'irreversible' again soon, and oh yes, i did love me some 'requiem'. wonder if there will be 'black swan 2: electric boogalo'..hey, c'mon!! theres art to be made, and an oscar nom even, wtf

Posted by: devildoggie at January 28, 2011 12:39 AM

Just saw 'Black Swan' last night and I have to say that this review perfectly captures what I was feeling as I walked out of the theatre but was unable to verbalize to my viewing companion. I'm glad I saw it but definitely felt it was deficient. Very well-written (though it's so late in the game I doubt you'll see my praise here, Daniel).

Posted by: prairiegirl at February 6, 2011 9:53 AM

Couldn't disagree more. Loved it. I felt the emotion throughout. I was constantly frustrated by the Nina character and felt satisfaction when she was physically punished for being so pathetic. I also felt like I understood what it might be like to actually be losing your mind over an obsession.

I enjoyed the play within a play idea even though it has been done before.

I thought it was clever how it showed how people in the entertainment industry will turn a blind eye to almost any kind of self-destructive behaviour if it'll get the outcome they're after. I felt like the mother and company director got their just desserts in the end.

I could definitely see why some people wouldn't like it but I like movies that make you work for it :)

Posted by: Jo at February 22, 2011 11:15 PM