web
counter
 

The Dark Knight Rejuvenated

By TK | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (29)



rehood1.jpg

DC Animated Universe has to date shown a near-flawless track record for animated adaptations of DC heroes. With the exception of the middling Green Lantern: First Flight, they have, under the production tutelage of legendary animator Bruce Timm, thrived and continually impressed viewers and essentially cornered the direct-to-DVD superhero market. Their newest endeavor, Batman: Under The Red Hood may well be their finest work to date. A bold statement to be sure, but certainly a true one.

First and foremost: it is difficult to review this film without spoiling some of it — I’ve already done so with the header pic, but I’ll try… try… to keep any further spoilers to a minimum. That said, much of the content of the film is taken from the already-established Batman comic book canon (namely A Death In The Family and Under The Hood), so it won’t be too much of a shock to regular comic book readers.

Batman: Under The Red Hood starts with a depiction of one of the more controversial moments in Batman history — the death of Jason Todd, the second Robin, at the hands of the Joker. It’s a surprisingly brutal scene, based on the comic storyline of A Death In The Family, although it’s given an independent twist. It takes place in Sarajevo, where the Joker (John Di Maggio) has captured Robin and methodically beats him to near-death with a crowbar, and then blows up the building he’s in before Batman (Bruce Greenwood) can arrive to save him. We quickly cut to five years later, where Batman is still haunted by that night in Bosnia, the Joker is locked up tight in Arkham Asylum, and Gotham is still a hotbed of organized crime.

Shorty thereafter, a new player shows up named The Red Hood (Jensen Ackles), a red-masked, steel-tempered individual intent on wresting control of Gotham’s criminal element from the manic, disfigured crime lord, Black Mask (Wade Williams). What follows next is a breathless visual assault as Batman tries to stop both Black Mask and Red Hood, before their escalating war brings the city to its knees. However, there’s more at play than meets the eye, and soon several of Batman’s old ghosts are coming back to torment him. Batman, with the assistance of the always-steady Alfred (Jim Piddock) and the Dick Grayson, the original Robin now called Nightwing (Neil Patrick Harris), must get to the bottom of it all and try to (as usual) save the city.

Under The Red Hood is unquestionably one of the darkest entries in DC Animated’s repertoire. It’s a grim, harsh look that focuses on Batman’s scarred psyche and the demons that drive him. Typical of DC Animated fare, it’s a relatively mature take on the material — not as rough as The Dark Knight, but it certainly spends a good amount of time in PG-13 territory. Batman, especially the modern, post-Crisis On Infinite Earths incarnation, is one of DC’s more complex characters, a morose, almost psychotically driven hero who, rightfully or not, takes every mistake as a personal failure, adding to the ammunition of his drive for justice. It’s smartly explored here, and Bruce Greenwood’s voice talent is pitch-perfect. Taking a page from Christian Bale no doubt, his depiction is smart, rough, harsh — though lacks the near-incomprehensible growl that Bale used under the cowl. The remaining talent is equally spectacular — Ackles’s performance surprised me, given that I’ve always thought him to be something of a dimwitted prettyboy (based on limited exposure, I’ll concede). However, he brings a wealth of depth to the unusual character of The Red Hood — a sociopathic crimnial who seems to believe that he’s actually working for the greater good, though he’s got more to his agenda than that.

Neil Patrick Harris’s Nightwing is unsurprisingly fantastic, and brings some much-needed levity to an overall grim picture. Perhaps most impressive though was John Di Maggio’s Joker — it’s a chilling yet disturbingly amusing depiction that captures the madness of the Joker perfectly. He certainly leans towards the Heath Ledger end of the dial — a complete and utter lunatic who kills without hesitation, sometimes with purpose, sometimes simply out of boredom or to amuse himself. At the same time, his cracked voice and gleeful crowing is just right — there’s enough of “The Clown Prince Of Crime” there to satisfy those who don’t see the Joker as the twitching madman that he was in Nolan’s universe. With all due respect to Jack Nicholson and Mark Hamill, it may well be the second-best depiction of the Joker I’ve witnessed.

The animation is as is typical of DC Animated’s efforts — superb. It abandons the overly stylized, muscle-heavy drawing of Superman/Batman: Public Enemies, and instead returns to the technique reminiscent of Wonder Woman or the superlative Superman: Doomsday. However, its lines and shading seemed more striking, the setting darker and more intense — fitting, given the subject matter — but still, it was a lively, gorgeous film. Directed by Brandon Vietti (Superman: Doomsday) and written by Judd Winick, it’s a strong entry into DC’s ongoing series of films. The action scenes are fast-paced and hard-hitting, but it’s (thankfully) not over-edited, enabling the viewer to see clearly what’s going on. The fighting is at times amazing graceful, and at others gritty and dirty, just what one wants from a Batman film. And while Batman’s gadgets are as impressive and varied as always, they are never allowed to take center stage.

Batman: Under The Red Hood is easily one of DC’s best efforts, which is high praise indeed. It features top-notch animation that we’ve become accustomed to, and clever, slick writing and direction. There’s not a weak spot to be found among the voice actors, and it features an excellent assortment of classic and new characters — in addition to Batman, Robin, Nightwing, the Joker and Alfred, it also features appearances by The Riddler (voiced by Bruce Timm himself) and Ra’s al Ghul (the suitably menacing Jason Isaacs). It’s yet another solid entry into the animated pantheon, and this particular Batman fan found it to be resoundingly satisfying.

TK writes about music and movies for Pajiba. He likes dogs, raising the dead, and tacos. You can email him here.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Baby, Come Over, I Need Entertaining. I Had a Stilted, Pretending Day | "Celebrities Are Better than You" | "Jersey Shore" Season Two Review | Comin' Up Next on The Violence Channel: An All-New "Ow, My Balls!"









Comments

Before reading this review, I definitely wanted to rent it. Even considered forgoing the Netflix wait and going back to the old Blockbuster. Just this one time. After reading this review, however, I want to leave work and purchase this movie right now, then skip the rest of the afternoon and watch the hell out of it. You really do have the best job, TK.

Also, based on the plot outline (regardless if you've read the comics) described here, is it really a spoiler to say that the Red Hood is-- Kidding!

Posted by: RobP at August 3, 2010 2:50 PM

I'm glad that this is good. The movie offerings this year has been subpar at best and I've found myself watchign some of DC's animated movies of the last several years and they've been pretty good.

And I can't believe you thought Jensen Ackles was a dimwitted pretty boy , you clearly haven't seen Supernatural yet. A mistake I hope you'll one day correct.

Posted by: koolio123 at August 3, 2010 2:53 PM

I totally agree with everything you said.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at August 3, 2010 2:57 PM

It's "Clown Prince of Crime". Not Crown.

And while DiMaggio is awesome (both Bender from Futurama and Marcus Fenix from Gears of War), I'm going to disagree: Mark Hamill IS The Joker.

See here for why

That said, they got a really terrific cast to work on this. I'm impressed.

Posted by: Fredo at August 3, 2010 3:05 PM

I just saw this a couple days ago and loved it.

Posted by: jadeblue at August 3, 2010 3:05 PM

i want it NOW. a death in the family is one of the saddest story arcs i've ever read, from any title.

Posted by: gp at August 3, 2010 3:06 PM

I am also seconding the suggestion to watch Supernatural. I am consistently impressed with Ackles.

Posted by: jadeblue at August 3, 2010 3:07 PM

"Under The Red Hood is unquestionably one of the darkest entries in DC Animated’s repertoire." Agreed. I loved it! Good review.

Posted by: SarahReznor aka Barkai at August 3, 2010 3:08 PM

Mrs. Lantern let me get a PPV showing of this over my birthday weekend and...well I gotta (mostly) agree with TK. "Red Hood" was well written, well acted (or voiced...is that the preferred term?), and comfortably handled a lot of DC lore in a tight package.

Though I gotta say, I didn't love Joker's voice. It was good...but not GREAT...and threw what could've otherwise been a stellar characterization. I also found it interesting how much Greenwood (and pretty much every actor who's voiced Batman) seem to be channeling Kevin Conroy. This should be seen as praise to Conroy for setting a gold standard, not a detraction of everyone else.

Posted by: Green Lantern at August 3, 2010 3:33 PM

Shit dude, I'm glad then that you got some more exposure to Ackles. Supernatural is on The CW, so it gets lumped in with shit like Gossip Girl and Vampire Diaries, but Jensen Ackles is fantastic. Kind of ridiculously fantastic.

Posted by: sarahk at August 3, 2010 3:43 PM

The last scene (spoilers?) kind of killed me. Where they show that flashback to Jason Todd at happier times after everything that happened.

Posted by: Dillingerlives at August 3, 2010 4:11 PM

Echoing the comments about Ackles - Supernatural is one of those shows that started out okay and with each season just got better and better, and that's in large part due to Ackles's increasing range as an actor. (Jared Padalecki also improved quite noticeably, but not as dramatically as Ackles did.)

Posted by: mightygodking at August 3, 2010 4:54 PM

Sorry. "Under the Red Hood" just sounds dirty. And painful.

Posted by: Odnon. at August 3, 2010 4:59 PM

I little disappointed by the absence of Messrs. Conroy and Hamill, but this is still gonna be on my watch list.

Posted by: stryker1121 at August 3, 2010 9:06 PM

You really do have the best job, TK.

Posted by: RobP at August 3, 2010 2:50 PM


Try telling him that while he's doing a real-time review of "The Client List" on Lifetime...

Posted by: Uriah Creep at August 3, 2010 9:53 PM

Great review.

I hate you.

Gonna see it.

I hope Stacey traps you in a closet with a TV locked on Lifetime for a month for that Ackles stuff.

I did mention I hate you, right?

Posted by: Vermillion at August 4, 2010 12:16 AM

Yay! Viva la Netflix!

Posted by: Chickaboom at August 4, 2010 2:40 AM

@stryker1121 I'm honestly getting tired of hearing about how people are disappointed Conroy and Hamill aren't in this. I LOVED BTAS but as much as I loved that I know that eventually someone else is gonna have to do these voices and personally I would love if Greenwood and DiMaggio took over for awhile.

Posted by: thingschange at August 4, 2010 4:44 AM


I'm male,and just had a brief encounter with a young woman. It was wonderful. We met on this si te: ``sugardaddy hunt .com - a good way to meet sugardaddies or sugarbabies, and she actually approached me first.It just so happens I like young women and she likes men around my age. We had an amazing day and later on she joined me at a hotel. It was like a fantasy come true. Amazing company, amazing sex too and a really warm and loving woman.She will turn 21 this month, and my goodness what a conn

Posted by: sugardaddyhunt.com at August 4, 2010 5:28 AM

I really enjoyed this; I appreciated its straightforward emotional complexity, if that makes sense. depth if that makes sense. Everyone had predictable depth (or predictable insanity) and it was moving (or entertaining). Great voice work, great animation.

Posted by: nigeltde at August 4, 2010 8:41 AM

You really can't argue against Bruce Greenwood. C'mon. When he gets Capt. Kirk to straighten his dumb-ass out? God, if Bruce Greenwood were MY dad I would have cured AIDS, forged peace in the Middle East and had enough spare time to save the world thrice over.

p.s. on the subject of Dark Knight bloat, I am also going to throw my hat in the boat for the undying love. *EXCEPT*

Posted by: D-Day at August 4, 2010 11:59 AM

for the last scene with the passengers on the boat trying to figure out whether or not to blow up the other. It felt forced, and the tension was seemingly removed from the scene.

I actually understand what Nolan was saying throughout the entirety of that little sub-plot, but I think he could have brought some more drama by not showing it as much. The prisoner boat in particular should have been a few quick shots of the place going bullshit, in some way or another. Even if it ends at the same point, it just felt not quite up to the other standards of the movie.

Sorry for the double post, accidentally hit "post".

Posted by: D-Day at August 4, 2010 12:01 PM

I loved this one, especially the ending. I'm so glad they took it in a darker direction. Great review TK.

Di Maggio's voice bothered me because I was expecting Hammill but it eventually grew on me.

Posted by: Mick J at August 4, 2010 11:55 PM

I loved this, but I think the worst thing in the movie is Joker's delivery. The voice is OK but he is not maniacal enough.

Posted by: Teckla at August 5, 2010 1:01 PM

Finally ended up watching this last night, and TK's review was right on. Under the Red Hood really is one of the best Batman adaptations ever done, and I loved the way they incorporated the comic's mythology into a new story. Very cool. Almost all of it would work within Nolan's universe, as well.

On the subject of DiMaggio's Joker... I liked it quite a bit. I can't say it's my favorite Joker, but it worked quite well for this movie. A sort of combination between Heath Ledger and Mark Hammil. And, personally, I'm glad the laugh wasn't as "maniacal" (I read that as "loud") as Hammil's, it wouldn't have fit. Though, I will admit, part of me was waiting for it go there. But, that, sirs and madams, is just conditioning. I was expecting the worst, like hearing Bender in every line, and it was far, far from it. Definitely proved he's more talented than I ever gave him credit for.

Oh, and Bruce Greenwood was fine, but Kevin Conroy is always and forever the best.

Posted by: RobP at August 5, 2010 2:20 PM

kolp

Posted by: noaff at August 10, 2010 9:35 AM

preuiew of gour comment:

Posted by: noaff at August 10, 2010 9:47 AM

I lived with Bruce Greenwood as the voice of Batman, but I wasn't happy with the animation of Batman. Nightwing's animation was closer to what I was expecting. With his cowl off, Batman looks so young and soft (square and flat) but then he's aged and more angular with it on. At the same time, it bounces back and forth on the look with his cowl off. Yes, I realize it is a cartoon. But I've come to expect certain things from my Batman cartoons. Either way, HUGE FAN! Kevin Conroy is definitely Batman.

Posted by: thorsgal at November 10, 2010 11:55 AM

oh please

Conroy is played out, his voice sounds especially out of place when it doesn't take part in the DCAU

Time for a big change, hopefully Arkham City is his last outing a la Mark Hamill

Posted by: The Man who speaks the truth at February 13, 2011 5:49 AM