free counter with statistics Adventureland Review | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

adventureland403.jpg
I Got Soul


Adventureland / Daniel Carlson

Film Reviews | April 3, 2009 | Comments (81)


If the humor in director Greg Mottola’s Superbad was largely credited to writers Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg, then surely Mottola deserves accolades for taking all those dick jokes and giving them a sturdier than expected emotional context; like it or not, there’s a kind of gritty sweetness to the way the core male relationship played out in that film, and it’s that kind of emotional truth that Mottola brings in spades to Adventureland. Directing from his own screenplay, Mottola creates a film that’s funny without being wacky and sweet without being saccharine, and he manages to perfectly capture that glistening moment right between youth and whatever comes next. The film is a heartbreaking, bittersweet coming-of-age story born of Mottola’s own experiences working summer jobs, but it’s broad enough to resonate as more than just a comedy about (post-)teens. It couldn’t be further from Superbad in tone or execution — for just starters, no one’s pants are at any point stained with menstrual blood — but it’s that film’s direct descendant in emotional honesty and its filmmaker’s decision to mature just like his characters.

It’s 1987, and James (Jesse Eisenberg) has just graduated from college. He’s got big plans for life after school that start with a backpacking trip through Europe, which is more a convenient shorthand for James’ socioeconomic status and blindered view of life than anything else. But his parents (Jack Gilpin and Wendie Malick), who had promised to help him out, let him down, and his only way forward is to seek out that humiliating milestone of everyone’s youth, the summer job. After realizing he doesn’t even have the proven skills to wait tables or drive a truck, James turns to Tommy Frigo (Matt Bush), a mildly psychotic friend from his childhood, to get him a gig working at Adventureland, a local theme park/carnival. The park is staffed by young men and women James’ age who find themselves stuck there and would gladly leave if only they had someplace better to be. Joel (Martin Starr), showing James the ropes of how to run the various ring-toss and water balloon games he’ll be overseeing for the season, reminds him that they’re “doing the work of lazy, pathetic morons.” At the park, James also meets Em (Kristen Stewart), the kind of tragically pouty young girl destined to lead boys like James to dangerous conclusions about their lives. One of the great things about Mottola’s story is that it takes what in a simpler film would be James’ entire goal — pursuing and hopefully being with Em — and makes it a first-act signpost. James and Em flirt and date and hang out with the other employees at house parties, and it’s because the goal here isn’t some basic romantic comedy but an actual emotional arc that pushes past easier beginnings and endings and gets at the hearts of the characters. It’s always more daring to explore an actual relationship instead of just the anticipation of one. There’s less of a safety net below the characters, and Mottola is wonderful at the way he explores how these people on the brink of adulthood feel about each other and what that means for the lives they’re still trying to figure out how to lead.

But in case I’ve made the film sound somehow too maudlin — and James is admittedly the kind of guy who listens to Velvet Underground while thinking Really Intensely about the girl riding shotgun — I should point out again that it’s also a comedy, and a great one. Starr is incisive and soulful as Joel, a pipe-smoking elder statesman among the employees who bonds with James because they’re two of the smarter ones forced to dispense prizes to tourists. The park is run by Bobby (Bill Hader) and Paulette (Kristen Wiig), who have a fantastic comic chemistry and whose scenes often contain randomly improvised moments. Frigo won’t stop punching James in the balls because it’s something he started doing to kids when he was 5 years old and never grew tired of doing. Mottola’s screenplay is packed with a dry but heartfelt wit he sharpened working behind the camera on “Undeclared” and “Arrested Development,” and he’s funny in an honest way, by which I mean his characters are never meant to be ironic comments on modern youth or placeholders for real people. There’s a straightforwardness to his comedy, and that grants it emotional heft. Mottola is also far too talented to let his film become some kind of 1980s in-joke, where characters riff about the wonders of the VCR or car phones or some similarly cheap, easy way to skewer the era. James and his newfound friends at the park live in normal houses with older cars and don’t talk about them as if they’re in a period movie. They just live their lives.

The bulk of the film follows James’ mercurial relationship with Em and how it affects his dwindling time at the park, and what it means for his life after that summer. Eisenberg was basically born for roles like this one, playing a smart, sensitive, nervous little guy who gets youthfully smitten. He’s got the courage to let himself get in too deep in a relationship, to overcommit out of fear of not doing anything, and he inhabits the character so well it’s like Mottola wrote it just for him. Stewart is about as good as she’s ever been, which is to say she’s adequate at seeming vaguely desirable and excellent at playing mute and aloof. The surprise standout is Ryan Reynolds as Mike, an easygoing maintenance guy at the park who plays in a local band and trades on tall tales about jamming with Lou Reed to impress the ever younger visitors and employees at the park. Reynolds is allowed to play his own age and play it quietly, and he does some of his most interesting work to date by creating a slightly skeevy adult who hates what he’s become but doesn’t quite have the motivation to snap out of it. But Adventureland truly belongs to Mottola, who firmly establishes himself as a skilled writer-director with a story about love, youth, and what it feels like to drown in possibility. James and Em are forced to confront the very real chance that their lives will be more defined by loss than gain, or at least by the risk of loss as opposed to the safety of retreat, and when James hears Lou Reed sing about “everything I had but couldn’t keep,” you know it’s the first time he’s really understood the idea.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a low-level employee at a Hollywood industry magazine. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.


Fast & Furious Review | Fastestest and Furiousest Wins the Giant Ass Panda



Comments

Saw it last night, actually. I was surprised at how much more serious/dark the tone was than I expected it to be. Pleasantly surprised though. It was fantastic.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at April 3, 2009 3:51 PM

I wasn't going to see this movie, my reasoning being Superbad and its ilk have never interested me. I'm just not that demographic. But I didn't know it was set in the 80's and now I think I've changed my mind. I was a teenager in that era and I worked for a children's amusement park one summer... It's possible this movie will hit me where I live after all.

Posted by: kerin34 at April 3, 2009 3:57 PM

Wow. I planned on seeing this as a devoted obligation to my hometown amusement park; I totally expected it to fail. Now I'm kinda looking forward to it. Plus I don't loathe Kristin Steward, so that'll make it easier.

Posted by: Kate at April 3, 2009 3:59 PM

*Stewart. I don't loath stewards either, though.

Posted by: Kate at April 3, 2009 4:01 PM

Great, great review Dan. I can not wait to see this. I keep hearing how fantastic Hader and Wiig are together, and I've always loved both Martin Starr and Eisenberg. So excited.

he’s funny in an honest way, by which I mean his characters are never meant to be ironic comments on modern youth or placeholders for real people.

That's what made those shows so great. It's so sad Undeclared ended so early.

Posted by: Julie at April 3, 2009 4:01 PM

You had me at "It's 1987..." Like all people, I'm a sucker for the decade in which I came of age.

I'm also intrigued that it's not like Superbad. I tried so hard to watch all of that movie, I heard it was SOOOOOOOOOO funny. And I probably chuckled a few times. But honest to God, and I'm no prude, there's only so many times you can hear extreme cussing and ball and dick references before you just get totally bored with it all. I fast fowarded through the last 30 minutes or so, including the entire thing with the cops.

This sounds like something I'd even see in the THEATER, gotdamnit.

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at April 3, 2009 4:05 PM

jesse eisenberg doesn't glitter like diamonds in the sunlight, does he?

then how the hell do you expect me to believe kristen stewart's gonna get with that?

Posted by: gp at April 3, 2009 4:06 PM

Yaay, I half-wanted to see this when I saw commercials, but I was afraid it would be disappointing.

Posted by: sabrIna at April 3, 2009 4:07 PM

Nice review, sounds like a decent movie. For once I'm actually looking forward to the experience.

Posted by: lordhelmet at April 3, 2009 4:08 PM

his characters are never meant to be ironic comments on modern youth or placeholders for real people

This, more than anything else, will make me see this. I mean, I actually wanted to see it anyway, but this makes it seem like less of a stupid punching-people-in-the-balls guy movie and more like something I'd actually be interested in the story of.

Posted by: totally not Anna von Beaverplatz at all (which is not-AvB, not not-AB) at April 3, 2009 4:09 PM

Snuggie, I feel you. The boy dragged me to see that movie out of his devotion to Michael Cera. I knew it was going to be a kinda gross out comedy and wasn't interested at all. I walked out after the penis drawing part. It wasn't that it was offensive, it was just so repetitive and gross.

I went to Big Lots.

Posted by: Kate at April 3, 2009 4:09 PM

gp,

I'm sure she's able to imagine the glittering so she can kiss him. I mean come on, if he doesn't glitter what's the point? He has craft supply herpes!

Posted by: Kate at April 3, 2009 4:11 PM

He has craft supply herpes!

I will now be using that description ALL THE TIME when explaining Twilight to people.

Posted by: Julie at April 3, 2009 4:17 PM

I got that little nostalgic ache in the pit of my stomach when I watched the trailer - now, I really want to go see it.

BTW, I *heart* J.Eisen. I've thought he had talent from the first time I saw him on "Get Real" (also the first credit for Horseface Hathaway, who I grudgingly admired in Rachel Getting Married). That show was pretty good, but tried too hard to be another My SoCalled Life.

Posted by: Treena at April 3, 2009 4:20 PM

If nothing else, I'm glad to see Martin Starr getting some serious facetime in a major release. He's one of the Freaks and Geeks alums that I always felt was underappreciated and deserved better than what we've seen him in since then. Glad to hear that this is a good flick too! I think I'll wait for it to hit the cheap seats, but it's one flick I'll definitely check out.

Posted by: Roaddog at April 3, 2009 4:20 PM

Nice review Dan. I was planning to see this because of Heder and Wiig (who is my love slave but doesn't know it yet). I am even more inclined due to it sounding a little less Superbad then I thought it would be.

Ryan Reynolds can act? Who knew?

Posted by: totallynotadminpretendinghe'sDr.SueJohanson at April 3, 2009 4:21 PM

Gah! outed by the remember me checkmark.

Posted by: admin at April 3, 2009 4:22 PM

Nice review. I've wanted to see this since I first saw the trailer and now I want to see it even more. Sounds like a good date movie.

Posted by: sosumi at April 3, 2009 4:24 PM

Whoa, Treena. "Horseface Hathaway?" Rachel Getting Married as pretty good? It wasn't entertainment, it was a documentary about a dysfunctional family with substance abuse issues. An overly long, far-too-realistic look inside a wedding weekend with incomprehensible multicultural artifacts. The lovely, elegant, and talented AnneHath was the best thing about it, and the only reason I finished it besides a lack of anything else on TV at the time.

Posted by: lordhelmet at April 3, 2009 4:30 PM

Yet again, this site and these reviewers write what I wish I could articulate. I was able to see this a few weeks ago at my university, and it was all a bit too close to home with graduation looming. But yes, funny, but more importantly honest.

Also, I now have a huge crush on Martin Starr after hearing him hit on a girl by discussing 19th century Russian writers. Who knew Bill Haverchuck would come close to Jeff Goldbum in my Jewcrush pantheon?

Posted by: foursweatervests at April 3, 2009 4:32 PM

"AnneHath was the best thing about it, and the only reason I finished it besides a lack of anything else on TV at the time."

Posted by: lordhelmet at April 3, 2009 4:30 PM

I didn't finish it, and can't for the life of me figure out why everyone thought it was so great. I thought it was pretentious and boring.

I can visit the in-laws if I want dysfunctional.

Posted by: annoyingmouse at April 3, 2009 4:35 PM

This movie really hit home for me, and your review does a great job of explaining why. I really hope it doesn't disappoint too many people thinking they're getting "Superbad." I hope people can accept it for what it is.

Posted by: Eric Melin at April 3, 2009 4:36 PM

Julie: DO IT.

Just remember Dimitri Martin deserves the props. "Uh oh, it's sunny outside: FLARE UP."

Posted by: Kate at April 3, 2009 4:39 PM

I read the music for this was really great - so I'm glad to hear the film is as well.

Posted by: Cindy at April 3, 2009 4:40 PM

Okay, maybe I'll go a little gentler on Hathaway. She is the reason I got through the movie too. Mind you, I watch Intervention, so I'm kind of a sick addiction voyeur (addict?)

She just really put me off in Brokeback, and has chosen to star in some real garbage (Prada, fucking Bride Wars?) J.Eisen has seven projects coming up in the next year alone, so he'll have more opportunities to put me off in the near future.

Posted by: Treena at April 3, 2009 4:41 PM

Man, that's a relief.

I wasn't really sure how to interpret the film, as I heard of it's dark elements mixed in with the comedy. That, and, it seemed like on of those movies that could go either way, being highly praised or ridiculed because it was trying to be something it shouldn't have been.

I was gonna see it regardless of whatever anyone said about it, yet it's kind of nice to see it praised.

Posted by: Riley at April 3, 2009 4:52 PM

totallynotadminpretendinghe'sDr.SueJohanson

Ryan Reynolds did illustrate that he could be in movie roles that required him to be more serious.

Whether people love it or hate it, Smokin' Aces showed Reynolds in top form as a serious actor, never so much as making even a minimal joke.

I still appreciate that movie for what it was, being a very over-the-top, convoluted action film.

Jeremy Piven's best acting role...sort of.

Posted by: Riley at April 3, 2009 4:55 PM

Yayy Martin Starr. I loved him so much in Freaks and Geeks, and HATED the kid who played Sam.

Posted by: Sharon at April 3, 2009 5:28 PM

BILL HAVERCHUCK IS MY BOYFRIEND. That is all. Carry on.

Posted by: coveredinbees at April 3, 2009 5:42 PM

side note: If any of you have ShoW (showtime west I believe), True Romance is on tonight at 9PM CST. That's all..as you were.

Posted by: legib at April 3, 2009 6:01 PM

I just realized that Martin Starr was in this movie. There's just something about his mannerism that gets me.

Great review. I can't wait to see this now. Thanks Dan.

Posted by: Wormer at April 3, 2009 6:04 PM

Bitchin' review, Herr Carlson. I'm planning on seeing it tonight or tomorrow, depending on how much vodka I have in the freezer when I get home.

Posted by: Skitz at April 3, 2009 6:06 PM

coveredinbees, NO, THAT MAN IS MINE. (Rips off your weave and parades it around stage triumphantly.)

Posted by: Brook at April 3, 2009 6:19 PM

Hey does anyone know if this is the movie that was filmed at Adventureland on Long Island? I remember there was a movie filmed there 1 or 2 years ago (or maybe it was 3? They all run together at this point in my life.)

Posted by: JenVegas at April 3, 2009 6:43 PM

Does Ryan Reynolds deliver every line with that same jerky Ace Ventura impression he does in every movie I've seen him in where he's supposed to be funny?

Posted by: dave at April 3, 2009 6:56 PM

I was thinking of going to see this just to see how they dirtied up Kennywood, but now I think I want to see it because Dan makes it sounds pretty damn good.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at April 3, 2009 7:00 PM

It seems to me from the trailer and this review that Ryan Reynolds is basically playing Caddyshack-era Chevy Chase. It's about time somebody did; I miss that guy.

Posted by: Eep at April 3, 2009 7:05 PM

COMMENCING TOPIC-APPROPRIATE, NON-THREATENING COMMENTARY OF CONCISE LENGTH*

I like your review. I would like to see this film. This site is fun.

*Robot voice. Guh.

Posted by: Lauren at April 3, 2009 7:05 PM

I had to watch Squid and the Whale twice; once to see it, and the second time to try and concentrate on the story instead of how ridiculously snoggable Jesse is. What a pout!
That said, he has this way of seeming blank, yet simultaneously inhabiting his entire body when he acts. As if he is truly thinking everything his character is required to be thinking in the scene, and not a thought more. It's mesmerizing.


Like his pout.

Posted by: Sweetie Dahling at April 3, 2009 7:11 PM

Hmmm... might see this tonight. I love Martin Starr, Bill Hader and the guy from Squid and the Whale is a dead-ringer for the guy that stalked me in high school (a lot cuter in retrospect). Still... I'm getting a little irked at all these Gen Y/Z kids (r)aping my tender teenage years with their Palestinian scarves and leggings and Clash t-shirts and ironic Member's Only jackets and movies set in 1980-something with "Blister in the Sun" on the soundtrack. Make your own counterculture, already! OH, and words can't describe how much I hated "Superbad."

That is all.

Posted by: Dascha at April 3, 2009 7:33 PM

I was hoping Daniel would review this. Lovely review as always.

As for Ryan Reynolds talking about Lou Reed....well, that's pretty dangerous for my loins. I'll take the risk.

Posted by: alison at April 3, 2009 7:40 PM

Kate, I'm from the Canonsburg area, went to Point Park and lived for a while in Swissvale and then Greensburg. ,daughter and I try to hit the 'Wood every summer.

You?

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at April 3, 2009 8:22 PM

Oh, Dan! That was a lovely review. It sounds like this movie is everything I'd hoped it be after seeing the trailer but feared it wouldn't live up to. I thought Superbad was funny, but it wasn't great for me.

I'm a big ol' sucker for movies with heart and honesty. But aren't too sweet they make me go into a sugar coma.

Posted by: Kayanne at April 3, 2009 8:26 PM

Sorry Riley, I forgot the sarcasm tag.

Posted by: admin at April 3, 2009 8:35 PM

Great review, Dan. I didn't hear about this film, but I may have to check it out during my spring break.

The timing is actually kind of funny for me. I went to a tri-valley teen job & volunteer fair the other day, and the county fairgrounds, located in the city I live in, is offering jobs for the summer.

Posted by: KP at April 3, 2009 8:58 PM

Thank you to all the posters who have indicated that they do not fall down an worship at the altar of Ryan Reynolds, like most of the people I know. I do not get the attraction at all. All right, the dude is buff, but he always looks like a smarmy frat-boy to me.

Posted by: kerin34 at April 3, 2009 9:58 PM

I'm from the South Hills (Greentree) area; I'm back here again for a while. I think I've missed Kennywood during the summer for 2-3 years since I was..., 5?

Oh, and the boy went to Point Park for a year or two.

Posted by: Kate at April 3, 2009 10:10 PM

PPU a happening place now, has bought up half of downtown (they keep hitting me up for money; I figure they must have more than I do). When I was there it was just a few years after students went into the streets with cans and hit up passers-by for change because the school was an inch from bankruptcy and having the doors padlocked.

I don't get to town too often but I will be at the Pirates home opener. And various watering spots before and after.

Nice to meet another older 'Jiban, Kate, especially a Burgher. It's like a day care around here sometimes ...

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at April 3, 2009 10:41 PM

Ryan Reynolds is ripped, and his face is not unattractive, but then you have to go about a mile across his forehead to get to his hair. Am I the only one who has noticed this? It was very distracting (like Hathaway's mouth, or as my sister once pointed out, Kevin Kline's lack of an upper lip) when I watched Definitely maybe. Haven't seen him in anything else.

Looking forward to this movie though.

Posted by: icyn2 at April 3, 2009 11:14 PM

Daniel, your "...manages to perfectly capture that glistening moment right between youth and whatever comes next." line perfectly presents that vague time in my life that I've never been able to articulate but always appreciated having experienced.

Your solid review pushed me over to the "looking forward to seeing it" side of the fence.

Posted by: JustMo at April 3, 2009 11:31 PM

Ah, I was just messing with ya. Besides does it really matter if Reynolds could act or not? He's awesome just for who he is.

He made something as simple as showing off your cock and balls in a restaurant funny. Movie wasn't perfect, but it most likely would've been a helluva lot worse had he not been one of the main characters in it.

icyn2, really, you don't think Reynolds is handsome? Hmmmm...I always that he was a good looking cat.

And Anne Hathaway is so damn beautiful. She may be often pale as a ghost, but c'mon, isn't it a guy fantasy to have sex with ghosts*? Or it that just me?

*Ghosts, people, not the dead. Just wanted to clear that up, though I doubt I helped my arguement any.

Posted by: Riley at April 3, 2009 11:32 PM

Heeeheeheeee! I love me some good ol' springtime Indie action.

Posted by: Sapphiar at April 3, 2009 11:38 PM

I dunno about that Anne Hathaway. She's oddly mannequin-ey to me. It's that smile.

And someone above mentioned how they were put-off by her in "Brokeback" yet, for me, that's probably one of the only times I tolerated her. She was a bit of a hard-ass; it was kinda hot.

Posted by: Sapphiar at April 3, 2009 11:41 PM

It's like a day care around here sometimes ...

bucdaddy, my mom was wondering if she should bake cupcakes or cookies for the spring time sugar swap! She said no matter which one she makes, I gets to frost 'em!

(Also, I've grown nervous of seeing this movie as the whole "no job after college" plotline may hit a little too close to home. Help.)

Posted by: Kayanne at April 3, 2009 11:43 PM

K, Why one or the other? Cupcakes AND cookies, Sugar!

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at April 3, 2009 11:57 PM

Reviews like this are precisely why I come to this site.

Daniel Carson, I have a way with words crush on you. Keep it up, dude.

Posted by: Gee at April 4, 2009 12:28 AM

Brook, do not MAKE me cut you. (aside: How was that? I'm really really really white. Does it show?) Ahem, I mean, biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitch.

Posted by: coveredinbees at April 4, 2009 1:23 AM

Hathaway's just got that elegant beauty to her, and the smile is dazzling. If you want a really big mouth that's distractingly so, and arguably detracting from beauty, look at Julia Roberts or Sandra Bullock.

Great review, btw, but this premise just leaves me cold. If it comes on TV I'll give it a shot but I've got better things to spend money on.

Posted by: lordhelmet at April 4, 2009 2:02 AM

GREAT review, but did you have to bring up Ryan Reynolds? Are we on this topic again? And really, saying this performance represents some of his best work is pretty faint praise.

And who's responsible for bringing up Horseface Hathaway? Another inexplicably popular "star."

Posted by: jimbob at April 4, 2009 10:40 AM

She may be often pale as a ghost

*breathes deeply, gently taps fingers a few times*

Pale.....is not something to qualify with.

Posted by: Jay at April 4, 2009 1:00 PM

I'll wait until is Pay Per View. I rather take a moment to hate on Anne Hathaway aka Sarah Jessica Parker's stablemate, one of the ugliest most overrated players in Hollywood right now. Seriously, I don't know how this chick has fooled so many folks into believing she's some sort of serious actress. Apart from the fact that she should be doing hard time in the Federal pen.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 4, 2009 2:43 PM

Must I defend m'lady's honor, Barb?
I cite the film "Havoc" as evidence towards the shapeliness and high quality of her breasts. Also, her legs go on for miles.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at April 4, 2009 5:21 PM

Point of Clarification: I meant Anne Hathaway, not the mare SJP.
BACK TO YOUR REGULARLY SCHEDULED REVIEW:
I might actually be working at a similar sort of gig over the summer. Except it's more old timey. I see something like this and hope for similar schenanigans.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at April 4, 2009 5:24 PM

I just don't understand how people can find Anne Hathaway unattractive. Mystifies me completely. Those eyes! That figure! The porcelain complexion! *sigh*

Onto Adventureland: thanks to this review, I'm now rather excited about this one. The ads I've been seeing did not make it look appealing at all--looked more like a cheap Superbad knockoff than a less-crude version of same.

Posted by: meaux at April 4, 2009 6:08 PM

Dascha!!!! Thank you! In my day only Palestinians wore those scarves and "Blister in the Sun" came out in 1992!

My hairstylist goes on and on about how she detests Anne Hathaway. It's hilarious. She is so utterly succinct and well-spoken on this topic alone.

Good review Dan. I was gonna skip it and see I Love You, Man tonight, but I may have to go and see it now. Also, anyone seen Sunshine Cleaning? Really want to know if it's any good.

Posted by: rayliota at April 4, 2009 7:35 PM

"Blister in the Sun" came out in 1992

1982

Posted by: Jay at April 4, 2009 8:46 PM

hee hee I know. My typing's been all out of whack today. For shame!

Posted by: rayliota at April 4, 2009 9:00 PM

Phew!

Posted by: Jay at April 4, 2009 9:12 PM

I know, close one there! Never let it be said that rayliota doesn't know her Violent Femmes.

Posted by: rayliota at April 4, 2009 9:15 PM

Ryan Reynolds is ripped, and his face is not unattractive, but then you have to go about a mile across his forehead to get to his hair.

I will make that journey, my friend. See, I'm actually put off by the super-cut abs...they are intimidating and not a little inhuman. A softer tummy indicates familiarity with the pleasures of the flesh.

The gently receding hairline, now, it whispers naughty promises in the night.

Posted by: ALR at April 4, 2009 11:31 PM

"A softer tummy ... The gently receding hairline ..."
---
ALR, looks like this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship.

Gonna try to get Mrs. , out to this today.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at April 5, 2009 12:42 AM

"the kind of tragically pouty young girl destined to lead boys like James to dangerous conclusions about their lives."

I am in awe of this excellent piece of prose.

Really nice..........

Posted by: Barec2 at April 5, 2009 9:09 AM

Thanks for this review, Dan. I cannot wait to see this film.

Posted by: Caspar at April 5, 2009 10:52 PM

hmmm, I guess my issue with Ryan Reynolds forehead is that it doesn't seem to be a receding hairline, he's got plenty of hair, he just has an inordinately large forehead that makes the rest of his features seem squished into the lower part of his face. Why doesn't anyone see this?

Posted by: icyn2 at April 6, 2009 3:43 AM

Fantastic review. I work at a theme park now and my manager sent me an e-mail about this movie maybe 3 weeks ago. Thinking of taking some of my department to see it on Friday, right before opening day. The trailer put me off cause it seemed kinda dumb, but now I have some hope that I'll enjoy the movie itself.

Posted by: Gabs at April 6, 2009 11:19 PM

They tried to make Kennywood look crappy, and they failed. There's a brief shot of the park (the Racer, Kate) at night with the neon reflected in the pond that's just beautiful. There are few places I've been that are prettier than Kennywood lit up at night.

This is a neat movie. These people talk and act like people I went to college with, not like Young Adults In Movies. While the ending is pretty much a foregone conclusion, the story doesn't take the easy way out along the way for the secondary characters.

SPOILER ALERT

SPOILER ALERT

SPOILER ALERT

I figure in your standard teen/young adult comedy, Joel would get the hot girl, and Mike would end up at the bottom of a pile of roller-coaster vomit. That neither of these things happens gives me respect for Mottola. Real-life people often don't get what they deserve, for good or bad. Smart but ugly guys end up alone; assholes fuck up people's lives and walk away. That's the way it mostly is.

In other words, this (probable) work of fiction seemed real. Nice job.

Nice review, too. Thanks, Dan.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at April 7, 2009 1:17 AM

fine review and this film is well written, directed and acted. eisenberg is the perfect neurotic..... only thing is that i don't think dan should apologize for leaving the impression that it is maudlin......it is maudlin ... just not in a bad way.

Posted by: snake at April 8, 2009 12:29 AM

I'm going to break away from the pack and low brow it up in here and admit that the highlight of the movie for me was the baseball bat scene with Hader.

I giggled intermittently for what felt like forever afterward.

Posted by: monkey_b at April 13, 2009 3:06 AM

This movie bugged me. I grew up outside of Pittsburgh, and frequented this park (Kennywood, where they filmed it) in the late 80's. What bummed me out was the lack of mullets and extreme perms. Mullets were EVERYWHERE (um, and still kinda are in many areas of PA) and I think there was MAYBE one mullet in the entire film with a vague attempt at spiked bangs. You cannot throw in some INXS and Falco songs with some acid washed jeans (which were unpegged. hello?) and simply have an 80's movie (although I was impressed that the license plates and inspection tags were in the proper time frame...)

Anyhoo, this film felt about 30 min. too long. I really didn't think it was funny, and thought James was just a whiny, spoiled little pussy. I'm surprised at the positive review - this film just felt too self-absorbed to really be noteworthy. I'm glad my friend dished out the cash for me to see this one. It's not great; it's not awful. It's just meh with a sprinkle of douche.

Posted by: Big Red 34 at April 13, 2009 2:01 PM

a) How did these comments devolve into a discussion of Anne Hathaway's and Ryan Reynold's respective levels of attractiveness?

b) To Big Red, above me: I think the point, as Daniel and others have noted, was to downplay the obvious 80s staples so it did not end up being That 80s Movie. It was more relevant and timeless this way. Meh with a sprinkle of douche?! Unnecessary.

c) Lisa P = WhooeeeooohMAMA!

d) Really liked the film. Criticisms: little too much Angsty Subplot and concomitant Weighted Acting going on with the Em character. The romance story felt contrived in its middle and end. Pluses: all the moments, honest, funny, random, a real that made up the film. The glance between James and his Father during that confrontation. Reynolds' line immediately after James pushes the button. ("You really fucked it up good"? Something like that?) The baseball bat wielding. Night scenes in the park. The blazed bumper cars. God it really got that lightness, the nostalgia down.

Really nice movie IMHO overall.

Posted by: nhakimi at April 13, 2009 4:59 PM


Yes I know the level of attractiveness on some actors is not the main point here but anyway I will comment.I think Anne Hathaway is BEAUTIFUL if there are something wrong in her style she can change it,that's it.
And about Ryan Reynolds: sometimes I think he's HOTTT as hell,and sometimes I just can't stand his forehead.Lately I can quit of staring at it.I guess it depends on the picture or the time(year)it was taken..Obviously he always have had a big forehead and despite of that I though he's VERY attractive but in the last two years the receding hairlines are getting bigger. I think he should fix that somehow.Am I shallow?Well he's an actor and is suppossed for actors their looks count a lot, and he got money rigth? Also personally I don't like to see a very handsome guy (any) ,still young with that problem early, worst if there are solutions and is not necessary to look that way ,but if he doesn't care...

Excuse me for the faults in writting,english is not my mother tongue.

Posted by: Ruby Y Moulet at April 24, 2009 10:59 PM