web
counter
 

50/50 Review: Somehow, Cancer And Comedy Combined To Make One Of The Year's Best Films

By TK | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (34)



50-50-movie.jpg

The worst descriptor one could use for 50/50 is “that cancer comedy,” for no other reason than because it oversimplifies what is a stunningly poignant, moving and occasionally devastating film that deals with one of the most dreadful diseases known to man. Of course, the hook is that 50/50 is also incredibly funny, bordering on hysterically so at times, yet the humor is so wry and bittersweet that it creates an emotionally jarring picture that, even when you’re laughing at loud, always feels like you’re waiting for the next gut punch. And I mean all of that in a very, very good way.

50/50 stars Joseph Gordon Levitt as Adam, a winsome, good natured 20-something who, after being afflicted with strange pains in his back for some time, finally goes to the doctor where he discovers that, to his despairing astonishment, he has cancer. A particularly voracious kind of cancer (that I can’t possibly reproduce the full name of), and his survival chances are somewhere around 50 percent. Adam takes the news surprisingly in stride, not quite accepting his fate, not quite descending into despair, but instead simply trying to understand his chances and do what he needs to do to try to beat it. At the same time, everyone around him goes into full-blown panic mode, whether it’s his best friend Kyle (Seth Rogen), whose coping mechanism is to try to get Adam laid; his girlfriend Rachael (Bryce Dallas Howard), who can’t seem to truly invest herself in Adam’s new problems, or his adorably manic mother (Anjelica Huston), who defaults to smothering mode. Each of them seems to be slipping into their own almost selfish world of coping with Adam’s problems, while none of them are, at least visibly, truly giving Adam the support that he needs.

Representing his harsh internal realities are a new set of acquaintances that Adam makes, including Kathleen (Anna Kendrick) a young, inexperienced and out-of-her-depth therapist, as well as two older gentlemen that Adam meets during chemotherapy sessions, played with the brutally honest, dry-wit brilliance of Phillip Baker Hall and Matt Frewer (yes, Max Headroom himself).

Where the film goes from there needs to be seen to be fully appreciated, but what’s important is that writer Will Reiser and director Jonathan Levine (The Wackness) have carefully crafted an amazing film that’s simultaneously beautiful, despairing, uplifting, hilarious and heartbreaking. Unlike most films that deal with cancer, it’s neither a maudlin sobfest nor a film filled with forced triumphs of the human spirit. Instead, it’s simply a film about Adam and the people he loves, and each of them comes with their own foibles, dramas, quirks and tragedies. None of Adam’s friends know quite what to do, because deep down inside, they know there simply isn’t anything they can do. There’s a bracing and discomforting honesty that comes with their portrayals, and the actors fill their roles to bursting with a heartfelt resonance that was at times almost too much to bear.

That this particular group of actors shone so brightly should be no surprise, though in Rogen’s case I was a bit taken aback at some of his more dramatic moments. For the most part, he plays Seth Rogen, the affable douchebag that we’ve come to know and (well, some of us anyway) love. Yet there’s a surprising depth to his character — the conflicted confusion of an amiable dope whose best friend is slowly slipping away, both literally and figuratively, and he resorts to what he knows best to try to cope with it. Bryce Dallas Howard’s Rachael has perhaps the toughest supporting role, in that it’s far and away the least likable, though that’s a testament to her ability. Rachael and Adam are still in the early phases of a relationship, not even close to a true commitment, when Adam’s affliction smashes into their tenuous companionship. Rachael’s determination to do “the right thing” has consequences that were unforeseen, and it’s an interesting spin on the relationship dynamics of a couple where one of them takes ill. What is the right thing to do? Stand by a man that you’re not even sure you loved in the first place? Or abandon him, and risk the subsequent self-loathing and guilt? It’s a complicated role Howard handles quite well, even if it’s a thankless and unpleasant one. On the other end of the spectrum is therapist Kathleen, who should know what the right things to do and say are, yet finds that her training is failing her in the face of Adam’s eventual crisis of mortality, as well as her inability to emotionally detach herself from his case.

There’s a certain predictability to 50/50, but the writing is so well-executed that it doesn’t matter. The dialogue is crisp and unforced, with none of the artificial conversational contrivances that movies about younger generations (my own included) sometimes depict. There aren’t sweeping speeches or rain-splattered declarations of love, there’s no soaring music or moments of clarity. Instead, there’s simply love and hate, joy and anguish, fear and comfort, all delicately woven into a challenging story. What makes it all that much more remarkable is the filmmakers’ ability to create such a gamut of emotions that feel genuine. 50/50 goes barreling through that emotional gauntlet, yet it does so with a quiet sense of purpose. At the same time, it’s also uproariously funny, which creates an visceral sense of dissonance. It’s an almost uncomfortable imbalance, a tumbling sense of uncontrolled swaying between brilliant, self-effacing humor and abrupt descents into heartrending poignancy.

50/50 is a testament to the best kind of filmmaking. It’s a brilliant run through a complex emotional issue that manages to touch upon all of the incumbent feelings of dread, sadness, joy, humor, desperation, and happiness. It’s one of the funniest, most intelligent movies of 2011, and certainly the most affecting. It’s a heartbreaker at times, but it’s also filled with a peculiar sense of winsome joie de vivre that makes it all the more engaging, and made it unquestionably my favorite movie of the year so far.

And seriously, fuck cancer.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Michael Murray's Adventures in Driver's Ed | Let's Pour Some Out for the Stars Who Never Were









Comments

Sounds great. Never would have heard of it otherwise. Thanks!

Posted by: twig at August 22, 2011 2:05 PM

Cancer. Yeah, thanks anyway.

Posted by: Meander at August 22, 2011 2:14 PM

I am pleasantly surprised by how good you are making Seth Rogen's performance sound. I wouldn't have expected that. Also, I had no idea that Anjelica Houston is in this, so yay!

With regards to your last sentence, as a Canadian on a day when our country lost the only Canadian politician I've ever found to be profoundly likeable...yeah, fuck cancer!

Posted by: kdm at August 22, 2011 2:20 PM

Did TK miss the real life connections to Seth Rogen and this film or is it all an internet hoax?

"The film is written by Rogen's real-life pal Will Reiser, and it is inspired by the true story of how the two friends dealt with Reiser's cancer diagnosis while they were in their early twenties."

Posted by: anikitty at August 22, 2011 2:32 PM

Again, I'm not sure if I should see this or not, even though I want to. It's very true that when I found out, it wasn't devastating or horrific, it was more, "Ok, what do I have to do now?" It's interesting that the writers took that route, rather than the usual after-school special emotional theatrics. The other truth I see is the reaction of those around you. No one really knows what to do or say.

When I found out I immediately went online to find out all I could. Part of that was joining several websites, forums and facebook groups. I found it odd that the most prominent complaint I heard was what people said while trying to comfort. I was actually astonished how mad people got at others' fumbled attempts at support. "You look good" was the main gripe. Almost all reacted as if it was insensitive to say "you look good" when obviously they aren't "good" inside, not with this disease eating them up.

I can identify with this in one way, because after surgery I did not "look good". I got tired of people saying it. I wished someone would come into my room and say "You look like shit, dude", because it would have been honest. It would have broken the fragile lie that everything was fine, which is actually why no one said it.

I still can't understand, though, why cancer patients were so mad at people. Transference I suppose. There isn't anything that can be said really. Nothing that is comforting. No one knows how to respond or what to say and that's ok. Getting mad at people for at least trying to do or say the right thing seems petty and selfish, but then, I also understand that emotions are a bit frayed at that point.

I eventually stopped going to many of these forums because the bulk of it seemed to be gripes and complaints of this nature. It's also easy to say "you find out who your real friends are". In some ways it's true, because people I thought were friends have said absolutely zero to me since this began, while others I barely know have gone waaay out of their way to offer support, but I also know that some people just can't handle this sort of thing, and I can't blame them for that.

Posted by: Protoguy at August 22, 2011 2:49 PM

I haven't been a very happy person since middle school a few years back it was worse than usual so I decided to go talk with someone. The therapist I saw seamed to be reading from the manual of the good therapist, when I got home I told my mother about her and she deadpanned: "She need a few suicides under her belt before she figures out how to do her job".

Posted by: rio at August 22, 2011 2:57 PM

and those few sentences had more grammatical errors I can count. shoot me now.

Posted by: rio at August 22, 2011 3:01 PM

50/50 is a testament to the best kind of filmmaking.

Dang. Didn't see dat coming.

Posted by: haplo at August 22, 2011 3:23 PM

God Seth Rogen again. Seriously when will people stop casting. He along with the other fat douches like Kevin James,Jonah Hill always bring crap performances

Posted by: YesPlease at August 22, 2011 3:48 PM

@ kdm - my sentiments exactly. Fuck cancer, and RIP Jack.

Posted by: Bert at August 22, 2011 3:57 PM

Fuck you too, TK.

Posted by: Cancer at August 22, 2011 4:07 PM

@YesPlease...dunno if you noticed, but apparently Rogen doesn't bring the suck.

Posted by: PissBoy at August 22, 2011 4:23 PM

Am I the only one going in expecting the same level of sad and humorous desperation from an episode of Louie (minus the absurdity)?

This is one of my most anticipated. I'm debating using one of my TIFF tickets just to see it a week before its release.

Posted by: aptrapani at August 22, 2011 4:53 PM

Sounds good. This one completely slipped under my radar.

Protoguy >> Thank you for sharing all that. If I could go back in time and tell you that you looked like shit then, I would. :- ) Keep up the fight and get well!

Posted by: DarthCorleone at August 22, 2011 5:00 PM

*sigh* Doesn't open until 9/30 in my area.

Posted by: Matt at August 22, 2011 5:20 PM

Thirded, kdm and Bert.

Posted by: meaux at August 22, 2011 6:43 PM

Credit where credit is due, TK: this was a great review. Good job.

Posted by: Uriah Creep at August 22, 2011 9:44 PM

I lived this with my college roomie, don't think I'm ready to see that again, but good to know it's out there. Fuck Cancer sideways with pointy sticks

Posted by: karen at August 23, 2011 11:46 AM

Many moons ago, when I was diagnosed with something I prefer not to discuss, the reactions of those around me were fascinating. People whom you think will react well are basket cases or say really unthinking things and then someone who is ordinarily a dip will say the perfect thing.

When I contacted a support group for the something I prefer not to discuss, they said by all means STAY OFF THE INTERNET because the information will only frighten you. A little internet is a dangerous thing. It can still freaks me out when I look it up all these years later and I KNOW how it is turning out for me. The support group even told me to avoid a specific movie as it "had set them back 20 years in public education".

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at August 23, 2011 4:33 PM

TK I second that this is a great review.

Fuck cancer (you too Cancer.)

And I can't wait to see this movie. Deeply personal (thanks @ proto and Mrs for giving some insight,) but this movie looks like what I wish more movies could be: honest.

Posted by: aroorda at September 5, 2011 8:25 PM

I'm interested to see how cancer itself is represented in the film. I have terminal cancer and I'm always wary of non-patients writing characters with cancer.
The title "50/50" made me wince, 'cause that's the big myth about cancer: that you're given a prognosis ("50/50"), treatment, then you either "beat it" or you die. That myth is frustrating. Nice onscreen, but nah. Doesn't happen that way.
This says it more succinctly than I can: http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/lanes.png
Yup. All that said, still wanna see it. I'll probably laugh my ass off.

Posted by: gordita at September 5, 2011 8:31 PM

GORGEOUS review TK, you sexy bastard.

Posted by: Caspar at September 6, 2011 4:42 AM

I read a version of this script back when it was "I'm With Cancer" and it was just "good". Everything I read regarding the film, and every trailer, seems to have been improved dramatically. Now I can't wait to see the film (JGL love pretty much ensured I'd see it as soon as I could, anyway), which I was previously pretty "meh" on.

I am most interested in Rogen's human, dramatic moment/s. There was a glimpse of it in my version of the script, but not nearly enough for my liking, or enough to warrant such praise in every review.

Can't wait.

Posted by: Steve at September 6, 2011 8:02 AM

@Gordita: perfect link. I was thinking about that exact cartoon.

@YesPlease: Seth Rogen gets cast b/c he's warm and fuzzy and he's co-WRITING a lot of these movies.

Posted by: bananapanda at September 6, 2011 3:06 PM

@YesPlease:
I guess they'll stop casting Seth Rogen in movies when he stops signing on to produce them. Like this one. Which, as noted above, was written by his good friend who quite literally lived the situation. And in which Seth is fundamentally playing himself.

Posted by: Jerry at September 30, 2011 2:56 PM

I saw this last week and it gave me a "I just experienced an amazing movie" high for several days. It is absolutely the best movie I've seen this year.

Excellent review TK!

Posted by: MN_Jen at September 30, 2011 2:59 PM

Rogen is playing Rogen because the Rogen-ish character Rogen is playing is based on Rogen.

Rogen Rogen Rogen.

Row. Gen.

ROOOOOOOOOOGEEEEEEEEEEN!!!!!!

Posted by: superasente at September 30, 2011 4:01 PM

After "The Wackness" I would watch anything by Levine. Levitt doesn't hurt either.

Posted by: Michin70 at September 30, 2011 4:43 PM

I enjoyed this movie. Went and checked it out today with my brother. He said the room was a little dusty. My allergies were acting up a little bit which totally explains the redness of our eyes when we left.

Posted by: Rubble44 at September 30, 2011 6:50 PM

Lovely review, TK.

Protoguy, I thought of you when I read this review and wonderered, as I read it, what you thought. Thanks.

rio, it's not the grammatical errors that count (as I always tell my students), it's CONTENT. You made me laugh. THAT's what matters.

My mom died from complications due to cancer treatment in the mid-1990s. There were MANY hilarious episodes in our family drama along the way (the Southern nurse who confessed that she ate Nestle-Quik powder because she developed an unnatural craving for all-things-chocolate when she was menstruating; the sibs and I set about trying to help her find alternative sources of chocolate so she wouldn't risk aspirating (her big fear) on chocolate powder).

In retrospect, MOST of the things we did---for and to Mom---could have been done "better," but, Mom graciously pardoned our ignorance, like you, Protoguy.

Maybe it's just better for close friends and family members to admit, "I love you, but I don't know WHAT to say or do because I'm colosally-screwed-up by my pathetic, emotional-reaction to your cancer, even though I want to 'be there' for you. What do YOU want to talk about?" And then be honest.

Posted by: Stinky at September 30, 2011 8:01 PM

"and those few sentences had more grammatical errors I can count. shoot me now."

Don't worry about it, rio; at least the point of the comment is understood. Can you decipher this one for me?


"Seriously when will people stop casting." YesPlease

or

"YesPlease...dunno if you noticed, but apparently Rogen doesn't bring the suck. PissBoy"

Okay... So now-- who exactly "noticed" this? If PissBoy claims to be one of the lucky few, even he can only commit to "apparently" noticing this, so what is the intent of the comment?


And please forgive, Protoguy: cancer is a very serious and cruel disease, but even after reading your comment I'm still not 100% certain of whether or not you yourself are indeed unfortunate enough to have "it."

"It's very true that when I found out, it wasn't devastating or horrific, it was more, "Ok, what do I have to do now?"

About cancer, you mean? Was cancer what you found out about?

"When I found out I immediately went online to find out all I could."

About the movie? About cancer?

"I can identify with this in one way, because after surgery I did not "look good"."

Identify with--- with???


And after what goddamned surgery?? Was it in fact for cancer? There are 'surgeries' for all kinds of things, cancer and its various permutations comprising a large number of them. Or if in actuality you only identify with not 'looking good' after said unspecified surgery, allow me to point out that a major segment of the planet's population could not in all honesty claim to "look good" immediately after just about any kind of surgery one could name. Maybe a few more nouns could have eliminated this need for clarification.

In any event, cancer, a fucked-up condition to be sure, is no excuse for obtuse writing.

(and rio, that should probably be "more grammatical errors than I can count.")

There, that's better.


Posted by: GMan at September 30, 2011 9:16 PM

Protoguy, could you look me up on Facebook and "friend" me? I'm listed as "Samantha Elliott" with a picture of the glorious Pepe Le Pew as my profile pic. I can't figure out which "Protoguy" you are on FB to send a "friend" request to but, I promise, ths is the only public, piitiful, friend-seeking I'll ever do via-Pajiba---or anywhere.

That is all.

Posted by: Stinky at September 30, 2011 10:40 PM

Amazing review. Thank you. It actually reminded me a little of a "This American Life" episode way back in '96 when Julia Sweeney discovered she had cancer and did a whole bunch of stand up about it. If you have a chance to give it a listen, I strongly recommend it

http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/9/julia-sweeney

Posted by: ajk at October 2, 2011 11:56 PM

"(the Southern nurse who confessed that she ate Nestle-Quik powder because she developed an unnatural craving for all-things-chocolate when she was menstruating; the sibs and I set about trying to help her find alternative sources of chocolate so she wouldn't risk aspirating (her big fear) on chocolate powder)."

Uh, you mean like real chocolate bars?

Posted by: BWeaves at October 3, 2011 10:45 AM