free counter with statistics 500 Days of Summer Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

500_days_of_summer.jpg
What I've Got's Full Stock of Thoughts and Dreams that Scatter


500 Days of Summer / Dustin Rowles

Film Reviews | July 31, 2009 | Comments (109)


You’re going to hate 500 Days of Summer.

Wait. Let me back up and restate that. In 456 days from now, you’re going to hate 500 Days of Summer. We first mentioned 500 Days of Summer on the site about two months ago. Let’s call that day one. On day one, you were just getting to know the movie. You knew it starred Zooey Deschanel — who you like off and on, depending on the role and just how pixie she is - and Joseph Gordon-Levitt, who impressed the hell out of you in Brick and Mysterious Skin and, by rights, should be well ahead of Zac Efron on the “next big Hollywood leading man” chart.

That makes today Day 62. On Day 62, you read the review for 500 Days of Summer and, though the gimmick employed by the critic was a tad too twee, you were nevertheless excited about the prospect of seeing the movie. It is, after all, the best indie romance since Eternal Sunshine of the Mind, a movie that fills you with that helium-like affection and a movie that will alternate between playing your heart strings like Eddie Van Halen on a coke bender and Yo Yo Ma covering a Beth Orton ballad. Jumping around chronologically, 500 Days of Summer tracks the rise, the fall, and the possible rise again of Tom (Gordon-Levitt), a greeting card maker with an architecture background, and Summer (Deschanel), an assistant in the greeting card company.

It’s a story about love, but it’s not a love story. Tom falls hard for Summer, but Summer - for reasons unexplained at first — is slightly detached. She wants to keep it casual. We know from the outset that they break up at least once, on day 288. And we see the days leading up to the break-up, which are intercut with the days subsequent to it, a brilliant chronological device that allows us to see the long-term consequences of a certain statement or gesture in a more immediate sense. Tom and Summer’s relationship travels from the idle talk of two co-workers who obviously have an affection for one another through the courtship and up to the relationship’s more cemented status before the floor is pulled out from under Tom. Then it explores the stages of heartbreak - the denial, the deconstruction, the wallowing self-pity, and the attempts to resurrect the relationship. But it does so without ever getting maudlin — 500 Days of Summer remains a breezy fast and emotionally exuberant film from the first minute to the last.

If I’m not doing a particularly good job of explaining 500 Days of Summer, it’s because it’s not an easy movie to describe. Try explaining to a friend why you’re in love with your significant other. You might say, “She’s beautiful; she’s got a great sense of humor; she’s wicked intelligent; and she has a great rack,” but this won’t do your significant other justice. They’re just words, and words rarely stack up to the effervescent giddiness you feel when you’re falling in love, or the crushing heartache an unexpected end to relationship can often leave. 500 Days of Summer, like few movies I’ve ever seen, accurately captures the range of emotions that accompany falling in love and then having your heart shattered. And while the dialogue is witty, and real, and funny, and smart, it’s director Marc Webb’s attention to the details that make 500 Days of Summer such a deeply authentic movie. There are a lot of movie about love, and even more that think they are, but very few successfully capture that helpless uncertainty attendant to a new relationship — the overwhelming need to pin it down, to label it, to gain a sense of security, to know that what he or she is feeling is not fleeting.

You’re already falling in love with it a little, aren’t you? When you see 500 Days of Summer, you’re going to fall heels pinned to head in love with it. It’s going to take a bicycle pump to your heart and expand it three sizes and then it’s going to cut you. And you’re going to laugh the whole way through. On Day 150, you’re going to see it again. By Day 200, you will have told all your friends about it, and they will have seen it twice. Suddenly, this little indie romance you heard about on a movie review website won’t feel like yours anymore. Everyone else will have seen it, and that will diminish some of the intimacy. By Day 325, friends of yours who forgot that you told them about the movie will come up to you, after seeing 500 Days of Summer on DVD, and recommend it to you, tell you how great it is, how it seems like a movie you’d really love. And you’ll be, like, “No shit. I told you about that movie six months ago.” And as this movie gets bigger and bigger, and as even people you despise fall in love with it, too, you’ll start to feel a little resentment toward it. By Day 375, the backlash will be in full force — a small, but vocal minority of cynical jackasses on that same website that first told you about the movie will start to rant about how 500 Days of Summer is too clever for its own good, that it’s too precious or whimsical or quirky or offbeat, and the voice of that vocal minority will drown out your own once-great affection for the movie. And by Day 456, you will absolutely despise 500 Days of Summer. You will jump on the backlash bandwagon. You will scream, “Overrated!” from the rooftops. And Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s newfound fame will irritate the hell out of you.

But on Day 498, 500 Days of Summer will air on television late one night while you’re alone, and you’ll watch it for the first time since you saw it the second time in the theater (your DVD copy remains unopened). And you’ll fall completely in love with it all over again — you’ll remember what it was about the movie that felt so honest and true and relatable and heartbreakingly beautiful, and everyone else will have moved on to the next big Zeitgestian film, and the intimacy you once felt for 500 Days of Summer will return. You may even quietly appreciate it more than you once did, because in the last 498 days, things have happened in your romantic life that made 500 Days speak to you even more than it once had. And the next morning, while you’re at brunch with friends, you’ll remark, “I forgot how much I love 500 Days of Summer. It’s such a funny, powerfully moving romantic film.” And some guy sitting across from you, scarfing down a steak-tip omelet and sweating from all the Tabasco sauce he poured onto it, will reply, “Overrated!”

And you will retort, simply, “You’re an idiot.”


This review was originally published during the Boston International Film Festival.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. You can email him or leave a comment below.


The Hurt Locker Review | The Hurt Locker Review



Comments

Oh thank god. I am almost completely immune to heard mentality with regard to things that I like (backlashes don't bug me, I'm kinda like "whatever, go over there and be too cool to enjoy things" and then dance to my old Spice Girls CDs while watching 10 Things I Hate About You for the zillionth time) I'm so glad that I can safely look forward to this movie.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at April 27, 2009 2:24 PM

The next time one of my friends decides to rip on Juno, I'll simply link them to this article. That sums up the sentiment quite nice. Excellent job!

Posted by: Dev at April 27, 2009 2:27 PM

Enough already! I'll go see it! I just wish it came out sooner. When I'm still at school where I can see it for $5 if I go before 1 and I have people who'd see it with me.
And what has been up with all the good movies lately?
I still need to get around to seeing The Brothers Bloom.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at April 27, 2009 2:27 PM

yay.

Posted by: s. pisaster at April 27, 2009 2:47 PM

...tobacco sauce?

Posted by: Withnail at April 27, 2009 2:51 PM

Thats a pretty nice timeline for falling with a film. Makes me really look forward to the next shitty 450 days.

Posted by: jim of the lower case at April 27, 2009 3:14 PM

Ditto, Optimus. As a student, I'm currently in possession of -$13.84. All of these good movies coming out are not going to improve that number, though I'm glad that we're out of the cinematic wasteland that was the first quarter of the year.

Fuck the haters. I was this movie's bitch from the first trailer and JGL's from Angels in the Outfield.

Posted by: jM at April 27, 2009 3:17 PM

aaaaaaand that's why i love this site

Posted by: RL at April 27, 2009 3:25 PM

I strangely have fond memories of Angels in the Outfield.
Hey, It Could Happen!

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at April 27, 2009 3:29 PM

and that ladies and gents is why Pajiba is the only site worth coming back to for more than five godtopus damn years already. I love you all so god damn much. *sob*

(Rowles: wow dude you really got me)

Posted by: Thaf at April 27, 2009 3:30 PM

Fantastic review. I've been looking forward to this movie for a while, and I solemnly swear I will never be one of the "haters." Unless, of course, I actually hate this movie. Which I probably won't. Because Joseph Gordon-Levitt is my secret boyfriend.

Posted by: Bre at April 27, 2009 4:03 PM

Note to self: Make sure you actually see this film when it comes out. No, not that hopeful promise you make too often about seeing a film that you really want to see, but then it just never happens and you're lucky if you catch it on DVD. No, this time you really, truly need to make it to this film, because it sounds perfect.

Thanks Dustin.

Posted by: tamatha at April 27, 2009 4:10 PM

Oh dear god, yes this is what always happens. Juno, Napoleon Dynamite (in fact I just rekindled my romance with it last night--it felt great), Saved, Eternal sunshine, across the universe, Amelie, Paris je t'aime. It always happens and it kills me every time it does. I saw the trailer for this about a month ago and have been nearly wetting myself in anticipation. Goddamn you uniformed masses and obnoxious hipsters who ruin everything. Good thing pajiba is here to call you out on your shit.

Posted by: Elise at April 27, 2009 4:26 PM

literally halfway through the review i scanned up to the top to make sure that i had indeed read correctly that i was going to hate the movie. the payoff at the end was quite worth it! and screw the juno-haters. i loved it when it was a cute, non-mainstream indie flick and i love it still, regardless of the press and the ridiculous backlash.

Posted by: aprileee at April 27, 2009 4:28 PM

Squee! I just had a Pajiba-gasm!

Posted by: Arib at April 27, 2009 5:28 PM

Wonderful write-up, Dustin. I have been yearning to make sweet whoopee with this film ever since I first heard about it. I can't bear to think that other people are going to have their wicked way with it.

Posted by: Caspar at April 27, 2009 5:29 PM

Oh my Gaaaawdddd. You are so right on it hurts.

This is really why I come to this site. The awareness. We may all fall into these stereotypes at one time or another, but goddammit if we aren't painfully aware of it!

Oh, I love pajiba soooo much!!! Hilarious and oh-so-true.

Posted by: AgoGo at April 27, 2009 5:34 PM

wow that was a good review i cant wait to see this.

Posted by: dhighman at April 27, 2009 6:19 PM

The review made me want to see it, even though I'd never heard of it before, but the ending pissed me off a little, just because it gets so annoying when people assume I don't like, say, Juno because of a knee-jerk backlash reaction. If I liked a movie pre-hype, I'm not ashamed to still like it post-hype.

Posted by: SaBrina at April 27, 2009 7:32 PM

A second Juno? Sounds good, yet despicable, yet funny, yet stupid, yet likeable.

Posted by: George at April 27, 2009 8:27 PM

Suddenly, this little indie romance you heard about on a movie review website won’t feel like yours anymore. Everyone else will have seen it, and that will diminish some of the intimacy.

Great description, Dustin! That is EXACTLY how I felt about the group Slum Village before they made the song "Selfish," which then introduced them to the masses. (As much of the masses as an underground rap group from Detroit would be privy to, but the masses nonetheless) And yes, I was selfish, and I did not want everyone telling me how great they were when I had known it all along years before that! Ok, done ranting about that. It opened up some old wounds, D, some old wounds.

And on another note, doesn't Zoey Deschanel have the perfect name for a cute, indie princess? I think so.

Posted by: ChaCha at April 27, 2009 10:24 PM

Slow clap.

This is one of my favourite things I've read on Pajiba in all these years. Well done, Dustin.

Posted by: dsbs at April 27, 2009 10:54 PM

You forgot The Lookout...Joseph Gordon Levitt was also pretty damn incredible in that as well.

I have a big girly crush on him and have always wished I could be Zooey Deschanel. So, naturally, ever since I saw this little nugget pop up on their imdb pages and saw that they were cast together in an indie rom-com I nearly shit my pants, and I nurtured that feeling for a long time and then let it blossom and now I have grown a shit flower for this film.

Can't wait to see it.

Posted by: citizen_cris at April 27, 2009 11:00 PM

This might be the best review I ever read. Amazing job :)

Posted by: Irina at April 28, 2009 7:29 AM

YES. This better not let me down, I have enough of that kind of shit in my life...

Posted by: soto at April 28, 2009 9:58 AM

Nuh-uh! I will see it, and I will love it, and when the backlash starts I will feel all special for being someone who's not so "pretentious" as to pretend not to get it, and our love will endure.

Although, I will feel jealous that J G-L will be suddenly univerally recognized and appreciated. But that's just, you know, part of any healthy relationship. When it's not blown out of proportion, a little jealousy can be endearing and spice things up a bit.

Posted by: Sweetie Dahling at April 28, 2009 11:55 AM

I can't wait to see this movie. I have watched the trailer so many times already. You had me scared though for a second, Dustin.

I second citizen_cris... JGL is AMAZING in The Lookout (one of my favorite films). Here's hoping he truly gets the fame he deserves.

Posted by: Melissa at April 28, 2009 1:31 PM

Dustin, I love it when you write about love.

That being said, I'm excited about this movie. However, I won't fall in love when everyone else does. I'll let the hype die down, because right now I'm not really in a good place to have a relationship. I'll rent it on DVD and fall in love then. That was how I did things with Mr. Suz, and it seems to be working out.

Angels in the Outfield was a great movie. Don't judge me.

Posted by: Suz at April 28, 2009 9:28 PM

Was there a backlash against "Eternal Sunshine"? I loved that movie.

Posted by: samantha t at April 29, 2009 3:54 PM

Saw it at Sundance...didn't care for it. Needless to say, most will be attending the new Harry Potter anyway.

Posted by: Stein at May 4, 2009 10:45 PM

I've been working up the courage to view a matinee, sort of a noncomittal gesture...like asking someone for coffee instead of dinner. Hopefully it will just be me, 65 year- old Enid and 5 of her bridge playing buddies...but now... I may just fork over the 4 extra dollars and go to the 7 o'clock show...On opening night :)

Posted by: Bo at June 26, 2009 10:10 AM

Fantastic Review Dustin! One of your best.

Posted by: "Luker" the barbarian at July 17, 2009 2:35 PM

...aaaaand it's playing NOWHERE NEAR ME.

suck.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at July 17, 2009 2:37 PM

Dustin, you just wrote a thumbnail to your first script. Through the eyes of an avid movie lover and the reaction of the general public. Splice three lives, yourself, the movie goer, and the movie idiot and you are ther.

Do it now, or Smith will still the idea.

Posted by: richmac at July 17, 2009 2:39 PM

*steal* so cast me as the idiot, I fit it.

Posted by: richmac at July 17, 2009 2:40 PM

It's only a limited release so I can't go see it anyway.

So BACK OFF!

Posted by: Jay at July 17, 2009 2:53 PM

Yup, nailed it.

"It's only a limited release so I can't go see it anyway."

Then you get in a car and you DRIVE UNTIL YOU FIND IT.

Posted by: TK at July 17, 2009 2:55 PM

I'm a sucker for movies that fuck with the time-space continuum.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at July 17, 2009 2:56 PM

I guess I'll watch it eventually, probably on TV when I'm bored. It's not the hype or the indieness of it, or the herd mentality. The trailer makes me not want to see it. I don't particularly like JGL. Or Deschanel. I'm just not interested.

Posted by: figgy at July 17, 2009 2:56 PM

Unless you can get to Boston, Chicago, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Los Angeles, San Diego, New York, San Francisco, Seattle, Toronto, or Washington, D.C., you is out of luck this week.

I'm a sucker for movies that fuck with the time-space continuum.

Bonus points for the inclusion of hump-back whales.

Posted by: branded at July 17, 2009 3:03 PM

figgy, if you don't like JGL, the problem isn't the hype or the indieness of it, the problem is that gaping chasm where your soul ought to be. Just ask Dustin. He'll tell you - or cut you. You never know.

Posted by: Landon at July 17, 2009 3:23 PM

I just don't like the Man Child type of actor. The ones who can be very talented, and make great movies, but will always look like babies and thus I will never buy anything they do. See also: Leonardo DiCaprio.

Posted by: figgy at July 17, 2009 3:31 PM

Then you get in a car and you DRIVE UNTIL YOU FIND IT.

Well, I'm getting on a plane to watch "Half-Blood Prince" with a very nice girl that I don't have to chase instead. Then we're gonna ride a bunch of roller coasters and drink a bunch of gin.

And what if I just felt like watching "Annie Hall" instead if I want a nonlinear breakup comedy, huh? Whatcha gonna do about it??

It's that fucking song! It's the worst Hall & Oates song! And he went and quoted it! I already knew I didn't like it and then it became melded in my mind with the "Chuck and Larry" trailer, which I had to sit through several times. Every time I hear it now I also see Kevin James falling off a ladder. "Kiss On My List", motherfucker! "Kiss On My List"! Shit, gimme "Walking On Sunshine"!

Damn I hate that song.

Posted by: Jay at July 17, 2009 3:36 PM

This review makes me want to see the movie. That's a first.
Thanks for taking my influential review virginity, Dustin. Will you still respect me in the morning?

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at July 17, 2009 3:38 PM

(Yeah, yeah, yeah, I'll probably watch it soon or later, and I was already going to, of course. Pajiba can't convince me to see a movie I wasn't going to though. You had your chance, motherscratchers!

And I don't hate or love or love/hate "Juno" cause I've never seen it! Ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!)

Posted by: Jay at July 17, 2009 3:45 PM

I always liked JGL on 3rd Rock from the Sun. An underrated show.

Posted by: mswas at July 17, 2009 3:46 PM

branded, I had "Memento" and "21 Grams" and such in mind more than actual time travel. Sorry if I didn't make that clear. Should have said "nonlinear storytelling."

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at July 17, 2009 4:22 PM

See, I knew this was an old review posted again but I didn't expect the comments to be the same. I saw someone said they could go see it for $5 if it was before noon and I said, "Hey. Me too. Wonder if they go to Central". And then I looked and saw it was my old post. Then I tasted metal for a second. Doc Brown warned me about this, I think.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at July 17, 2009 4:25 PM

So...good date flick? Yes? No?

Posted by: DeistBrawler at July 17, 2009 4:41 PM

Oh thank god, I thought I was having the worst case of deja vu ever.

And if you keep up with this I will end up hating it because it isn't out here for a frickin age and all the love will push me over the edge. Plus I watched The Happening recently and that's really made me question my like of Zooey D. What the hell was with that film?

Posted by: Carrie at July 17, 2009 4:49 PM

Wicked review. I am going to see this asap, it is only playing at one theater in Vancouver and only sunday night at 10pm :(

Posted by: Alli at July 17, 2009 5:03 PM

I do want to see this film, though I'd be more convinced if someone other than Dustin -- with his priapic boner for it -- had written the review. I remember all the hype on this site for "The Wackness" and was really excited to see it. I was . . . bitterly disappointed.

Posted by: jimbob at July 17, 2009 5:23 PM

Branded, I think you might have done a little too much LDS..

Posted by: lordhelmet at July 17, 2009 5:49 PM

Optimus - when this baby hits 88 comments, you're gonna see some serious shit!

Posted by: Doc Brown at July 17, 2009 5:56 PM

Woah, Woah....are people arguing and I'm missing out? Please say yes. Please?

Posted by: DeistBrawler at July 17, 2009 6:34 PM

no matter how clever your allusions to the juno backlash, it really doesn't change my mind that that movie truly did suck and was overrated, and that this one is one of the best i've seen in a long time.

Posted by: Scotty at July 17, 2009 6:44 PM

Branded, I think you might have done a little too much LDS..

Posted by: lordhelmet at July 17, 2009 5:49 PM
---
To my knowledge I've never done a Latter Day Saint, but I'd give it a try. The men all have four wives with 10 kids each, so while they're funny about alcohol and sody pop, the concept of "a little too much" apparently doesn't apply to fucking.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at July 17, 2009 6:52 PM

sigh...see star trek 4 please, ,. Why's it all come back to sex with you, anyway?

Posted by: lordhelmet at July 17, 2009 7:14 PM

in defense of , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy)...its sex. You don't have to say anything more then that. It's...just...sex. Sex is the whole reason that anyone who is on this site is here. In fact, if you even want to look at it further; We fucked the earth, the earth is fucking us, and god is fucking both of us. The universe is one giant orgy.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at July 17, 2009 7:45 PM

I'm in the middle of a cosmic three-way? Shouldn't I feel something in my pants?

*checks pants*

Nothing.

Eh. At least I've outlived Walter Cronkite.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at July 17, 2009 8:49 PM

Dear guys, come here !! *******Cougar circle.com******** a place to
date Sexy women and rich men will bring you fun and happiness ! If you are
over 2 2 years old, you will have more chance to be the focus of others
because of your Maturity !!!

Posted by: william at July 18, 2009 7:10 AM

The best since "Eternal Sunshine"? Really? I hate to be the sour puss at a wedding, but this movie is incredibly overrated. I fear you all have been duped. How so? For starters...thinly drawn characters, savvy montages w/ delicious indie music playing underneath and a story line that really gets wobbly around Day 440 or so. Stylistically, the film was unique, cute and even likable. It presents a lovely variation on the broken narrative format but let's not go crazy about it. The choice itself wasn't original, just the approach used.

Dustin, I generally like your reviews, but I'm at a loss as to how/why you found this story and these characters to be so...real, smart and relatable. Especially when comparing it to "Eternal". With Joel and Clementine we were given the very best and the very worst of what those two people had to offer in a relationship. We saw legit flaws that made, in moments, both of those characters deeply unlikable (which is how it should be when telling a 'real' story). With "500 Days", I feel it's too quirky for its own good. That's the difference between these two films. "Eternal", at the core, is about these two damaged people and the choices the filmmakers made in telling their story. Joel and Clementine were at the core of the narrative...why it existed, how it was moving forward. That's not the case with "500 Days". This film is clear, from the get go, that the 'story' is what comes first. "This isn't a love story. It's a story about love." That approach is where the characters, tone and style are derived from. Based on the final product given, it doesn't appear that the characters were created first, rather a specific type of story. I wasn't blown away by it.

The characters bothered me. I'm still perplexed as to how/why you found this to be so 'real'. Every standard cliche was in there. JGL had his two best friends...one that was the whipped, in a relationship for 12 years man and the other providing the comedic relief as the relationally/sexually depraved one. Thanks to "Juno" and "Little Miss Sunshine", JGL even had a little sister that was a hodgepodge of the two ladies from those respective flicks (though, in this case, they decided to completely remove any representation of a parent). I still can't decide if I like Zooey. I had issues with her character. The turning point, on my end, came during the Ikea sequence. Cuddling on a bed she tells him she just wants something casual, nothing serious. He's clearly deflated upon hearing this. Not 60 seconds later, leaving the store, she grabs his hand to hold (talk about getting a man's hopes up) only, by the end of the day, to end up naked in his bed (now that's really playing with a man's emotions). Characters like hers (regardless of gender mind you) don't sit well with me. We let them off the hook too easily. If her character can set the ground rules, telling him they're "just friends", then she's giving herself permission to then, through action and behavior, do whatever the hell she wants without consequence or repercussion (at least not to her). It's emotionally manipulative, not quirky and endearing. She was never taken to task for completely screwing with his emotions. Shame on you screenwriters.

Anywho, that being said, I didn't hate the movie. I laughed out loud a few times, found some moments endearing and would mildly recommend it to others. I won't (and I apologize for this) throw myself all over it and praise it for being the best indie love story since "Eternal Sunshine". Cheers....

Posted by: PeevedMovieBuff at July 18, 2009 2:18 PM

PeevedMovieBuff I actually just liked your review better. Now do one for Garden State and I will determine whether to love you or hate you.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at July 18, 2009 6:45 PM

Can't wait to see this, despite ZD.

Also a huge fan of The Lookout which rarely gets mentioned. When I watched the extras on the DVD for that film, I fell hard for JGL. He is so well read, eloquent and sincere. He did a bang up job on that part. A difficult role that took some guts and humility. I am looking forward to watching him grow.

Posted by: Kelly Booth at July 18, 2009 8:54 PM

"Eternal", at the core, is about these two damaged people and the choices the filmmakers made in telling their story.

That makes no sense. A film is about the choices the filmmakers made? What?

It's emotionally manipulative, not quirky and endearing. She was never taken to task for completely screwing with his emotions. Shame on you screenwriters.

Isn't the film essentially about Tom's unrealistic expectations in his relationship with this girl who has warned him from the outset that she doesn't want to get too serious? And what is this notion that any remotely unlikeable or slightly less-than-romantic female character should be punished for, as you're basically saying, being a cocktease?

If we're seriously talking about characters we don't like getting their comeuppances on film, I'd have loved to see Clementine hit a pedestrian in a crosswalk on one of her drunk-driving sprees and end up in prison. I fucking hate that character.

Posted by: Another Jen at July 18, 2009 10:55 PM

The movie's name is 'Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind', you left out "Spotless".

Posted by: Mr OCD at July 19, 2009 1:53 AM

"In 456 days from now."... Not sure that works. Don't you either say, "456 days from now" or "In 456 days"??
I gotta admit that made it hard for me to keep reading what was probably a great review.

Posted by: dg at July 19, 2009 10:27 AM

Hola DEISTBRAWLER. Thanks for your kind words. I admire your brevity. Regarding "Garden State"....in a nutshell....me thinks a generation of 'movie lovers' doth protest too much. I hate to use the word again, buuuuut "overrated" still, after all this time, feels to be the best adjective to use. Zac owes a hearty thank you to the music supervisor for creating a cultural phenomenon. You know, its kinda like how Diablo Cody owes the editor of "Juno" a big ass thank you for the Oscar she won. Did you see those deleted scenes on the DVD? What an (even more) drawn out, overwrought mess that story was. "Hey, let's get a 16 year old girl pregnant and make her self deprecatingly sarcastic!" Is that really what we pass off as character depth nowadays?

ANOTHER JEN, thank you for your feedback. I'd like to clarify the question marks you presented. I know it would be obvious that a film is about the choices a film maker made. As it relates to these two examples, here's what I meant. With "Eternal", the characters came first. In concept, design, lay out. The story itself was built around those two fu*$e! up people. Based on the structure and execution of "500 Days", the opposite was the case. The characters were built out of the concept of "love story, not about love", whimsical broken narrative, etc. They were constructs of a specific style as opposed to ("Eternal") having a unique style that was influenced by the characters themselves. I hope I clarified that better.

And, on some level, I agree with you. The story is about Tom's unrealistic expectations, based on what he was told. But here's where I get sketchy on it. If she really didn't want something serious and if she respected his feelings and cared for his emotions, she wouldn't have carried out her behavior and actions in such a serious and intimate manner. When all of your co-workers see you as a couple, based on their own observations, then that's saying something. Tom was right when he yelled at her and said, "Is this what you do with all your friends?!" Clearly, it isn't. If you don't want something serious, then don't spend such long, intimate amounts of time together. Saying something (even if its the complete opposite is presented in action) doesn't absolve one from being responsible from their choices. You're right, she said it to him up front, but then all of her actions and choices is what caused his emotional confusion. And while it takes two to tango, it's her fault for presenting such mixed signals. For what its worth, I would have loved to see Clementine end up in prison as well. Neither of those characters were particularly likable in that movie, but I do have a much deeper appreciation for it than something like "500 Days". Why? Because we can all appreciate the desire to erase our memories during the pain. On top of that, the arguments and shite throughout that movie were dirtier, grittier, more accurate to what I've encountered in my own life. Go back and watch that....dude, those two characters said the most angry things to each other. They really knew how to cut to the core. For my money's worth, that was accurate to true life. Not some random, former frat boy randomly walking up to us at a bar. That entire scene felt out of place. "We need a situation that will lead to this argument. Oh, that's it! Brilliant!".

I also wasn't finger pointing to specific female types of characters. I did say in my original post that characters like hers (regardless of gender) don't sit well with me. It just happened, with this story, that it was a female in question. I'm gay, so trust me, the men should be dragged by their toes for that behavior just as much. Cheers....

Posted by: PeevedMovieBuff at July 19, 2009 12:31 PM

This is one of the best reviews I've ever read and am certain that it will be 100% accurate.

Posted by: Heather! at July 19, 2009 1:42 PM

Although I purposefully skimmed some of Peeved's post to avoid any potentially Spoiler-ish stuff, I have to say, I liked your review, and your rebuttal. Well thought out and stated. Keep posting.
But I also really enjoyed Dustin's review, so this will mean most likely that I will Netflix this movie - because much as JGL rocks, I really can't stand whatsherface (where the hell is the page up function on this mac??? I am not clicking 50 times to scroll up and view the spelling of her name...)...

..and the Home button... are there no Home buttons on Macs??

Posted by: Stella at July 19, 2009 7:42 PM

Why, why, why must I wait til September for this movie? By then, the backlash will have begun and that will probably dampen the experience for me.

Most of the time, I love Australia. When movies get delayed 3 months (or more)? Not so much.

Posted by: redfeathers at July 19, 2009 10:01 PM

Posted by: PeevedMovieBuff at July 19, 2009 12:31 PM

You're a smartass. I now like you.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at July 20, 2009 4:07 AM

"What an (even more) drawn out, overwrought mess that story was. "Hey, let's get a 16 year old girl pregnant and make her self deprecatingly sarcastic!" Is that really what we pass off as character depth nowadays?"

I actually have to agree with this comment. I liked "Juno", but found Page's character positively insufferrable and flat.

Posted by: samantha t at July 20, 2009 7:15 AM

I also really, really hated the scene in Juno where Juno's mother went off on the ultrasound technician. Yes, the techician was 100% out-of-line for commenting on how "tragic" it was that a teenage girl was going through with having a baby (though, in truth, it generally does end up pretty shitty for all involved most of the time when the girl keeps the baby), but the way the mother insulted her seemed a. gratuitous and b. out-of-line with her character. I mean, this woman deserves to be castigated while stepmom scarcely questioned Juno's wisdom in getting pregnant/going through with the pregnancy? Weird.

Posted by: samantha t at July 20, 2009 7:19 AM

GREAT review Dustin. Just amazing.

Posted by: AmbroseKalifornia at July 20, 2009 9:59 AM

dustin, forget the raunch, the cleverness, the wiseass lists you dredge up to keep the faithful coming back. forget all of it.... and when it is stripped away it turns out that you are, quite simply and undeniably, a hopeless romantic.

can't wait to see it.

Posted by: snake at July 20, 2009 4:02 PM

Terrible, terrible movie. Didn't like 1 thing about it...waste of my time.

Posted by: Julie at July 20, 2009 4:20 PM


Hot cougars? Sensual milfs?
"Cougar Central"? "San Carlos" ? or "San Francisco"?
*** Agelover. c o m *** is the real place that is packed with them.

Posted by: maggielindia at July 21, 2009 2:16 AM

OK. There's some dissent. Thank God. Because I thought I was the only one who thought this looks, while not entirely lame, not nearly as good as everyone keeps claiming.

I feel like this is basically How I Met Your Mother: The Movie. Except without the framing device of older Ted telling his kids the story. Summer is Robin and Tom is Ted. I mean, he's even got architectural aspirations!

About the only thing that rings true for me is Summer being like "I'm warning you that I don't want a relationship with you, I just want to keep things casual." Apparently, I am going to be rich when I write a book for clueless hipster dudes entitled "She's just not that into you."

Posted by: Zooby at July 21, 2009 4:08 AM

I want to know what "heard" mentality is.

Posted by: Arkansan at July 21, 2009 10:39 AM

i have just returned from seeing this film and
have to say that dustin's review was right on
the money. it is all that he said it was. my
only reservation has to do with the hated
voiceover gimmick. i will have to see it again
just to judge whether we really needed
everything explained. see this movie.

Posted by: snake at July 21, 2009 4:13 PM

I hated this movie. I'm a horrible person.

Posted by: Flannery at July 22, 2009 1:55 PM

So I saw it today, after reading tons and tons of love for it. And for the most part I agree, it's a really good movie. It's breezy and the time jumps allow you to avoid the usual rom-com cliches.

That said, why the heck have the indie cliche of the "wise beyond her years" little girl? That felt forced and out of tune.

Overall though, good movie. Can't wait for the backlash.

Posted by: Fredo at July 26, 2009 3:06 AM

I saw this movie yesterday and it was so terribly disappointing I felt I had the wind knocked out of me. Vast.Emptiness. This movie does not come close to Eternal Sunshine. I loved watching All the Real Girls and for that reason alone I would not give up on Ms Deschanel. Alas, all things have an expiration date. Zooey has officially crossed over the line into a 'there is no there, there' actress. Pfffft...

Posted by: DorothyParker'sPinceNez at July 27, 2009 5:30 PM

Drove over an hour away from home to see this, then decided to make my first post on Pajiba after reading for over a year.

Loved it. Totally worth getting lost (twice) AND the outrageous ten dollars independent theaters charge around here. It made me so happy, then killed me, then made me so damn hopeful and giddy I can barely stomach it. That's a lot more emotion than I'm used to admitting to (I'm in a punk rock band, dammit). Been listening to the soundtrack since I got back and will buy the movie when it comes out.

Thanks for making me see this.

Posted by: Jordan B at July 28, 2009 4:48 AM

Is there a reason this keep getting bumped to the front page?

Posted by: Fantasysage at July 31, 2009 11:09 AM

Houston, we have a problem...

I thought I was getting a rather large case of the deja vus... this is a re-post, right? right?

Posted by: missh at July 31, 2009 11:59 AM

I believe the wide opening is today.

I know that it's now playing at an actual theater actually near me, and it's most likely what I'm doing tonight. Yay!

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at July 31, 2009 12:06 PM

so glad it's finally at a theatre near me!!! (and i don't live in a small city! errr...) was getting annoyed waiting for it. will see it first thing today!

Posted by: maxpurr9 at July 31, 2009 12:28 PM

I fully intend to go see this by myself. Probably more than once. Because I am awesome.

Posted by: Nicole at July 31, 2009 12:45 PM

I'm actually making a pilgrimage to Ann Arbor to finally see this with battgirl. For you Dustin. And so I can lord it over everyone when it finally makes it to rural Michigan. "Oh you haven't seen 500 Days of Summer yet? Wow, I thought EVERYONE did."

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at July 31, 2009 12:54 PM

Ooh, Nicole, I'll be seeing it by myself as well! Most of my friends are super lame (heh! Just kidding, friends!), especially pseudo-Mr. vB. Also, they're going down the shore, and I just don't think I feel like it. Maybe I'll go tomorrow. But tonight... Tonight will be movie night!

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at July 31, 2009 1:03 PM

I thought I was getting a rather large case of the deja vus... this is a re-post, right? right?

Worse, missh, this is the third time it's been posted. But the movie's been at varying times, and Dustin caught it at the film festival. The same thing will definitely happen with Worlds Greatest Dad.

Posted by: George at July 31, 2009 1:35 PM

This is the deal, I've already seen this movie twice.
I saw it last Saturday with a friend. And then, because the schedules of my friends and my girlfriend NEVER match up, ever, I saw again last night with my girlfriend.
The first time I saw it, I left the theater a little unhappy and not pleased with the movie.
But it stuck in my head, and I kept thinking about it (which annoyed me, a LOT), and then when I saw it last night I really liked it.
Weird.

Posted by: myysharona (formerly Sharon) at July 31, 2009 1:47 PM

I've had that with a few movies, Sha (you don't mind if I call you Sha, right? I hope not, because I'm way to lazy for more than one syllable). The first time I saw (and I know it's not a popular one) Napolean Dynamite, I was like, "What the hell just happened?!", but it stuck with me, and I have now watched it numerous times, and I love it. I know it's happened with a few other movies as well. Anything that sticks in your head like that has resonated in some way. To me, it's worth finding out why.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at July 31, 2009 2:05 PM

Good point, Beav (lots of syllables to choose from, I picked the funnier one).
I was the same way with Napoleon Dynamite. The first time I saw it I just kind of sat there, dazed. I looked at my friend and said "Um." Just like that. She says "What was, I mean, um . . . what?"
Yeah.
But I liked it more with repeat viewing.

OOOH, can THAT be a comment diversion, if it hasn't already? What movie did you only like after repeat viewings? Maybe there's some movie out there I think is crap, but only because I've seen it once.

Posted by: myysharona (formerly Sharon) at July 31, 2009 2:25 PM

Did you repost this review for wide release? Wasn't it posted a while back when it came out in limited release?

Still excited to see it.

Posted by: John Darc at August 1, 2009 5:58 AM

saw it. liked it.
saw it again. loved it!
beautifully put together.

Posted by: maxpurr9 at August 1, 2009 12:33 PM

Meh. Saw this film while vacationing in NYC, as a result of reading this glowing (to put it mildly) review. Thought it was pretty boring. I found JGL's character to be whiny and irritating, ZD wasn't too bad until she started babbling about twu luv at the end. Also there's a part where he's standing in the street and everything turns into a pencil drawing because he's sad...it felt really false and I found it irksome.

Posted by: prawntastic at August 1, 2009 4:37 PM

I caught this on Friday. My boyfriend and I were the only two people in the comfortably full theater who laughed at the "If someone gave me this card now, I'd eat it" line. And we laughed hard. And then even harder, when we realized no one else was laughing.

Posted by: jess at August 3, 2009 12:40 PM

Finally saw it. I think you talked it up way too much. It was good. I liked it. Away We Go was wayyy better.

Posted by: Kate at August 4, 2009 10:48 AM

Saw this film last night, and while I thought it was cute and entertaining enough, I have to say that upon reflection I really hate 500 Days of Summer.

For all the fucking with time the narrative does, it can kind of lead you to believe that the characters are somewhat different at the end of the 500 days than they were beforehand, but I don't think that's really the case. Tom, at the beginning of the film, falls in love with a cute girl basically because she likes the Smiths, and hey, so does he! He believes this to be kismet, as if The Smiths are somehow unpopular (which, thankfully, his friends make fun of him for in the film). At the end of the film, he basically has the exact same reaction to another cute girl who likes sitting in the same park as him, which isn't exactly a stunning coincidence since the park is apparently architecturally interesting and they are both architects. So, for Tom, we basically leave the film watching him step into what could be the exact same scenario we just painfully watched him go through. Romantic boy falls in love, gets dumped, stops believing in love for a few weeks, rinse, repeat. Also, first girl's name is Summer, second girl's name is Autumn. Cue my vomit.

Summer, who comes off to me as somewhat of a sociopath, starts off the movie not believing in love but at the end, she does. We're never really given any indication as to WHY she had this philosophical change, other than she met a guy who was apparently much better than Tom. But, as I said earlier, she's kind of a sociopath, so who knows what the hell she believes by the end of the film.

Finally, I hate this movie because Summer has no redeeming qualities and the film makers seem to be saying that not only should we accept this, but we should be happy for her (or at least Tom should be). No, fuck that, I'm sorry. Summer has her cake and eats it too throughout the entire film, not particularly giving one shit how Tom feels about it.

Yes, she does say that she is just looking for something casual and doesn't believe in love. But why should Tom take that at face value? Her actions absolutely betray that sentiment, both in her behavior with Tom and the fact that a very short time after she ends things with him, she ends up MARRIED. So she may not be looking for anything serious, but she wasn't spurning seriousness either. After it's apparent that Tom is in love with her, she does next to nothing to tone things down. Even after she breaks things off, she continues to be completely thoughtless regarding Tom's emotions to her. She invites him to a party at her house after basically turning into his impromptu date at a mutual friend's wedding, and casually forgets to mention that she's in a deep relationship on the verge of engagement. Before this, she's sending him emails with condescending lines like, "I hope this means you're ready to be friends," as if he's being immature about being upset by their breakup.

And then comes the final scene in the park, the last straw. After delivering what seemed to me as an unnecessarily harsh remark to Tom (something about Tom just not being the new guy, I can't remember the exact delivery), Tom gets all smiles and says he's happy for her. The basic message being that Summer is cute and twee and can do whatever the fuck she wants and Tom should be a nice guy and be happy for her, no matter the fact that she seems like the most self-centered, uncaring "friend" on the planet.

Fuck that and fuck this movie.

Posted by: mangrilla at August 5, 2009 2:08 PM

Saw it today. Sat in my car for 10 minutes afterward and cried for loves come and gone, for lessons learned the hard way. This was, in short, a brilliant fucking movie, and I love it more than my words can say.

Posted by: The Pink Hulk at August 13, 2009 10:55 PM

I finally saw it today, and I agree with what Dustin said about it (how it's really actually shows what it feels like to fall in love/get your heart broken) but I also feel that mangrilla is absolutely right about Summer and Tom. The ending left me feeling kinda queasy, with that Autumn bit, and I hate that Summer got off the hook (especially since the beginning described her as getting basically everything she wants, like the cheap awesome apartment - I live in NY, so am bitter) in the end. Yea, the message sucks, mangrilla, i agree.

Posted by: dene at August 14, 2009 12:39 AM

I have to agree with Mangrilla and PeevedMovieBuff on their criticisms on Zooey Deschanel's character. Her character is what is preventing me from truly liking the movie for all the reasons previously stated.

Yep, Summer gets her cake and eat it too, damn the consequences and the feelings of the person she strung along while acquiring said cake. She talks a big game about not believing in love. Fine. She says she doesn't want anything serious. Fine. But none of her actions throughout the movie were consistent with what she said. If you don't believe in love and odn't want anything serious, then you don't kiss somebody in the copy room. You don't invite them to your apartment and tell them all these secrets that you claim that you've never told anybody else before. You don't make the other person believe that you're tearing down all these defensive walls. You don't create the pretenses of an intimate relationship if you are saying that's not what you want. The other person is not going to take your words at face value if your actions are not consistent with your words.

So, she strings him along, dumps him, and then after all that talk about wanting to be a free woman and independent and love doesn't exist and blah blah blah, she's engaged and married very soon after the breakup? Tom's completely disillusioned now and then she wants to say, "Oh, but you were right! It all exists and the world is a shiny happy place now! It's just that I wasn't sure of it with you!" Yeah, keep twisting that knife.

Posted by: Automne at August 18, 2009 2:10 AM

JGL

Posted by: the chaplain at August 23, 2009 5:59 PM

Posted by: the chaplain at August 23, 2009 6:00 PM

I saw it!! Yessiree. Didn't LOVE it but I'm a bit bitter in the man dept so that was rough.

But when JGL was singing karaoke I just about died.

So glad he is getting the fame he DESERVES.

This movie was totally right on. Not too hyped up or in the mainstream consciousness to drive me mad so thank god.

Go see it!

Posted by: grace b at September 6, 2009 7:39 PM

I'm the idiot. It was not just overrated, it was borrring.

Posted by: james S at September 10, 2009 1:16 PM