web
counter
 

Colombiana Review: Please Line Up in a Single-File Line and Collect Your Ass Kickings

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (48)



The-Losers-Zoe-Saldana-25-11-09-kc.jpg

Colombiana is not a very good movie. In fact, it’s barely mediocre. But that’s OK. The lithesome Zoe Saldana more than makes up for the film’s woeful shortcomings; she is pure hotness and terror, a nimble shit-kicking human apparatus who is as vicious and unrelenting as she is drop-fucking-dead gorgeous. She is better than this movie. She may be the best female action hero since Linda Hamilton retired the wife-beater. Of this generation’s action heroines, Saldana would choke Kate Beckinsale to death with a bath towel and break off one of Angelina Jolie’s arms and stab it in Milla Jovovich’s ear. And she wouldn’t say a fucking word. She does all the dressing down with her eyes, and if you aren’t dead from the shame, the bullet in your head will surely do the trick.

I went into Colombiana an admirer. I came out a goddamn believer.

Colombiana follows Cataleya Restrepo (Saldana), who as a young girl (played by Amandla Stenberg) witnesses the death of her parents after a transaction between her father and Generic Colombian Kingpin goes sour. In the bloodbath, Cataleya escapes from Generic Capo and his Henchees with a microchip that she exchanges with the embassy for free passage to America. There, she moves in with her Generic Colombian Grandmother and her uncle Emilio (Cliff Curtis), the only other character in the film with any dimension. What was on the microchip is forgotten, and we never even get an idea of what kind of business Generic Kingpin is in, although it’s surely the business of choice for Generic Colombian Kingpins: Drugs. All that matters is that he killed Cataleya’s parents, and that’s motive enough for her to want to grow up and be a killer, an occupation that Emilio — a Kingpin of sorts himself — is happy to indulge, so long as she also hits the books.

Fifteen years pass, and in the meantime, Cataleya has the lucky goddamn fortune of growing into Zoe Saldana’s unholy body. She’s a killer, some sort of humanitarian assassin who gets rid of bad guys for a fee. She has also taken to leaving a tag on her victims. The tag is meant to draw out her parent’s killers, but it also invites the attention of the FBI, who start their own manhunt. In between the time she spends killing and escaping, Cataleya also finds a spare scene or two for booty calls with her fuck-buddy Danny (Michael Vartan).

Vartan is the epitome of what is wrong with Colombiana. He is the gaping genital sore of leading men, a cheap-suit commercial come-to-big-screen life. Saldana deserves better than Michael Vartan. She deserves better than generic Capo, and she deserves better than another one of the early drafts of Luc Besson’s The Professional. At the very least, she deserves the right to bury Clifton Collins, Jr. or Danny Trejo and fuck Gael García Bernal through a wall. But Vartan? That guy has to hire assistants to swing his dick for him. Jesus. Hollywood finally gives us Bourne with a bra, and they surround her with weak sauce like Vartan and Jordi Mollà, give her one of Besson’s hired-hands to direct, and then dump her into the second-to-last weekend of the summer? They’re not even giving her a chance.

But the miracle of Colombiana, if anyone bothers to check it out, is that Saldana has the kinetic agility not only to slink and kick, but to drape herself over giant plot holes and distract you from the pawns that stack up around her. She’s acrobatic, and so full of quick-edit energy that you’ll have no problem believing that she can beat the living snot out of men twice her size and pulverize their goddamn corpses. She deserves better than this shitty movie. She deserves her own shit-kicking franchise. But for now, this’ll do. Just wear a helmet to the theater, lest Saldana throw around one too many head slams.










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Rum Diary Trailer: Briefly, Disney Lets Johnny Depp Borrow His Own Soul | Interpreting Your Celebrity Dreams









Comments

this is interesting, because the trailer made me wonder how her stick arms could lift all those heavy weapons

Posted by: ugh god at August 26, 2011 11:14 AM

This is one of those movies that I really want to see because of the preview, and my life partner/moviegoing companion really doesn't want to see, also because of the preview. I will make a lot of noise about angrily going to the theater alone, but will probably just wait and catch it on demand at my parents' house this Christmas.

Posted by: Angeleno Ewok at August 26, 2011 11:16 AM

Psst as if. She is barely mediocre

Posted by: YesPlease at August 26, 2011 11:23 AM

Well I guess this is my best bet. A size 2 ass-kicker. yay.

Posted by: logan at August 26, 2011 11:25 AM

Angeleno Ewok, I could have written that comment. Same thing in my house, and I will inevitably end up watching it eventually on Netflix.

Or you and I can go together and revel in the glory that is Zoe Saldana kicking some ass! ;)

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at August 26, 2011 11:33 AM

I would watch the fuck out of a movie movie with Zoe Saldana and Gael Garcia Bernal fucking through a wall.

Posted by: Will at August 26, 2011 11:35 AM

Header pic is from The Losers.

Posted by: Scott at August 26, 2011 11:36 AM

Saldana exudes ass-kicking, which is why this might have a chance.

Then again, I've read other reviews that aren't as kind. So I'm torn.

If nothing else, the question from a few days' back is answered: Zoe will inherit Angelina's heroine crown. So let it be written. So let it be done.

Posted by: Fredo at August 26, 2011 11:47 AM

my thoughts exactly ugh god. fatten up a bit and then i'll start believing.

Posted by: senseless at August 26, 2011 11:48 AM

I, too, concur that Zoe Saldana could use a hoagie in her life. 3 hoagies. Plus some pasta.

But remember that god-awful piece of shit ballet movie Center Stage that she was featured in back in 2000? Homegirl was a certified ballerina at one point in her life, and exceptional dancers - especially ballerinas - are very strong. Very. So your unbelief is WROOOONNNNG!!!

Posted by: Rest In Peace at August 26, 2011 12:02 PM

So back to the plot for a moment... If I'm reading that much of it correctly, her parents were killed while doing business with a drug kingpin, right? Somehow I don't think they were fixing him a Grande Americano and a carrot cake muffin, so I will assume whatever they were a part of wasn't particularly reputable either. So while Zoe Toothpicks might be avenging the death of her parents, they don't exactly sound like innocents caught in the crossfire.

She was trained by a criminal to became a criminal, who kills criminals for killing her criminal parents. In other words she is exactly what she hates. Either that or she in fact has no qualms with the criminal life itself only to those in it who affected her negatively.

Might I assume in about fifteen years time she herself should expect a tsunami of vengeful children assassins gunning for her boney ass? It would seem to be only fair. Perhaps she should meet up with Beatrix Kiddo, as they would now seem to be in the same boat.

Posted by: bleujayone at August 26, 2011 12:15 PM

bleujayone - Have you been to the movies? If this follows most standard Hollywood fare, her parents were probably good people who got in the way of the Generic Kingpin, and that's why they were killed and why she's so hell bent on revenge.

Posted by: tamatha at August 26, 2011 12:42 PM

Oh sure, we think Andy Serkis is a motion-capture god for his emotive acting, but we can't give Saladana the same credit for using her expressive gifts in Avatar?

Avatar's script may have been crap, but it was obvious who actually showed up to act in the movie. That Saladana could kick your ass without a greenscreen suit was pretty clear.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at August 26, 2011 12:43 PM

Having only seen snippits of trailers, I was under the assumption this movie starred Thandie Newton the whole time.

The more you know.

Posted by: =DocDoom1= at August 26, 2011 12:43 PM

Idiosyncratic, that point you raised from Avatar was it's only saving grace for me. Didn't stop me from leaving the theater fore the denouement but it did give me hope about bridging the Uncanny Valley.Seems Ms. Saldana can do this across both the pixel and the page.

Posted by: Mr.West at August 26, 2011 1:24 PM

You know Rowles, sometimes you have bouts of sheer brilliance, and other times we get this. In the history of the world when ever has a broad that wears a size zero been able to kick someone’s ass, let alone a full grown man’s ass? These movies that have women in the lead as hit-women never seem to work out, maybe because a woman can’t kick a man’s ass like another man can. Some broad wants to impress me, make a porn movie, which is what this movie basically is, some broad running around in her panties killing motherfuckers.

Posted by: Pookie at August 26, 2011 1:24 PM

For some reason, I have no trouble whatsoever believing that Zoe Saldana could kick the living shit out of men twice her size. Same goes for Maggie Q, who does it regularly on Nikita. To me, at least, they look like their bodytype "fits" them, compared to good old Angie, who just looks malnourished.

And fuck yes, I'm seeing this.

Posted by: Vanessa at August 26, 2011 2:07 PM

Since when did sneering become acting...oh yeah, hello Rambo! Love the bit about using Jolie's arms as sticks. Netflix me, baby.

Posted by: James S at August 26, 2011 3:32 PM

Eff this overhyped shit...where's the Don't Be Afraid of the Dark review?

Posted by: PissBoy at August 26, 2011 4:30 PM

I'd take Zoe over Christina Hendricks any day.

Posted by: stump at August 26, 2011 4:31 PM

I agree that Saldana has a great shit face. As in, "Keep this shit up and I'll beat the shit out of you", not as in her face looks like shit. Girl is hotness on a stick.

However, there's no way that girl could kick a grown man's ass. Hell, she couldn't even kick my lady ass. I was a ballerina too (nowhere near as talanted as she, mind you) and yeah, there's strength and stamina involved, but not in a contact kind of way. Could she effectively perform a choreographed fight? Yes, girl can bring it no problem. But could she kick someone's ass for real? No. Difinitively no. Can I suspend my disbelief? Dustin gives a strong argument that it's possible with this film so we'll Red Box it.

I honestly don't know that any woman is capable of really, really beating up a man, especially if that woman is a size 0 Hollywood actress. Men are simply stronger and bigger, and they're exponentially stronger and bigger than a 5'7" woman weighing maybe 110. I hate to say that being a woman myself, but just because I don't like it doesn't make it less true. If you're barely heavy enough to donate a pint of blood, you cannot kick a grown man's ass.

Posted by: Double R at August 26, 2011 4:55 PM

Dustin, I'm sorry for being kind of a dick, but can I be very honest with you? I love your site, I love most of what is written around here, and I love the way you write, but I'm beginning to think you are kind of a shitty reviewer. There's a lot of reviews where you simply try to fit the movie into a bunch of elements that you think makes a "good movie", instead of letting the movie guide you and then trying to analyze the experience in a broader sense, which is what I think is a good way of reviewing a movie, in the sense that it gives the reader a good idea about what he can expect, and gives the person who has already seen it a broader understanding of his own experience... and in my opinion most of the others reviewers here at Pajiba do that, reason why I always look back here after watching a movie or when deciding which ones I'll pay for.

So I'm sorry, but you should really rethink the way you analyze the movies, because it's a waste of space in a great website, and it's a waste of great writer, because you're a damn good writer and if you could actually conduct a film analysis, you'd be a great reviewer.

I only read the first paragraph of this article... what really got me thinking was the Super 8 review, which I read yesterday, in which you keep putting the nostalgic feeling as a "cheat" without any apparent reason... and then I was thinking about recurring problems in your reviews.

Posted by: zito at August 26, 2011 6:28 PM

Zito, why would you come here and call someone you claim to admire a shitty reviewer? Personally I think Rowles is one the best reviewers I’ve read, Rene Rodriguez of the Miami Herald is my favorite. Zito, no disrespect but “Colombiana” isn’t’ exactly a film a true movie critic can sink his or her teeth into and come up with something profound to write. Rowles is a big fan of Saldana and maybe this review isn’t a great way to judge the way Rowles reviews films. Maybe he went to the theater as an average moviegoer and not a critical reviewer. What I’m trying to say is that Rowles’s work is very impressive.

Posted by: Pookie at August 26, 2011 7:18 PM

Personally, I just enjoy reading people's reviews when they talk mostly about what they got out of the movie. Their experience, how they saw it, what they felt. Such is the beauty of film, right? Being able to be something unique to each person who views it.

So Rowles got that Zoe Saldaña kicks ass out of the movie, among other things. I got that he got that, so I dig the review. It's a snapshot of someone's movie experience.

But you know, that's just like, your opinion, man.

Posted by: =DocDoom1= at August 26, 2011 7:33 PM

It's not like she's beating people to death. Looks like she's using guns. Don't have to be big to kill someone with a gun, or a knife, for that matter. So in that sense, it's realistic. As realistic as any other "action" movie.

And I like Michael Vartan, but eh, to each his/her own.

Posted by: Slash at August 26, 2011 7:45 PM

This looks like complete dog shit. And the fact its an abandoned script for a sequel to Leon is a down right travesty. And this lady is just lame. Shes never been in a good movie besides Star Trek. Look at her IMDB page.

Posted by: Sad Rockstar at August 26, 2011 8:20 PM

pls tell me this is a joke.

Posted by: haplo at August 26, 2011 8:31 PM

I saw this last night... The plot honestly doesn't even matter. Worth a matinee price to see Saldana take down a guy with naught but a hand towel and two toothbrushes.

Posted by: Jess at August 26, 2011 9:36 PM

Meh. The only thing that sounds worthwhile here is bleujayone's Grande Americano and a carrot cake muffin.

Posted by: Ish at August 26, 2011 10:38 PM

Pookie, the "shitty reviewer" was really uncalled for, I apologize for that. I was trying to get some constructive criticism here and not bash the guy (who I do truly admire), specially because I'm not really nobody to come and tell the guy which is the "right" way... my idea is that we can provide feedback that the guy can use to improve his work.

And as I said my argument wasn't really about this particular review, but about what I've been finding in Dustin's reviews as a whole. The "Super 8" review was the one that made me want to say something about that, in which I was really surprised to see a reviewer say that the movie somehow "fools" you into liking it without being "really good". What is a good movie if not one you like watching? As I see it, this is the reviewing trying to put his view in contact with a more universal view... which is a good thing to do, but that analysis can never try to set apart the movie from the experience, which is what I think Dustin has been trying to do. I didn't comment on it then because I read it months after it had been posted... then when I started reading this review today I thought of that again and decided I'd just say something here.

Posted by: zito at August 26, 2011 10:49 PM

I have beaten a full grown man up. Slammed one guy's head into a brick wall several times after he was stupid enough to grope me in a violent way. Hopefully he thought twice about doing that to a stranger next time it crossed his mind. I'm average sized. Training with knowledgeable martial arts instructors helps.

Posted by: Viking at August 26, 2011 11:36 PM

I know two former dancers-turned Krav Maga instructors. Neither of them is bigger than 5'6", and they're probably size 2 and 4 respectively.

One of them made the news a few years back for taking down a guy who her at her car one night. Broke his nose, his wrist, and could have done far, far more.

It's not always about sheer mass. It's how you use that mass, combined with speed, knowledge of the body and it's weak points, and knowing how to use your opponent's size against him.

Posted by: Lexie at August 27, 2011 12:04 AM

"It's not always about sheer mass. It's how you use that mass, combined with speed, knowledge of the body and it's weak points, and knowing how to use your opponent's size against him."

YES! And of course, (if you're Saldana) let's not forget the terribly distracting erection your opponent has to contend with.

Posted by: Scott at August 27, 2011 3:22 AM

She's cool, and she kicks arse. But...Haywire. Gina Carano'd take down Colombiana like gravity would a tower of toothpicks in a breeze - that is to say: effortlessly.

Posted by: zeke the pig at August 27, 2011 5:15 AM

Is this one of those movies where eight or 10 bad guys stand in a circle around her and take her on one at a time so she can kick their asses*, rather than gang-rush her into a pig pile or just do an Indiana Jones and pull a gun and shoot her ass? Because those movies tend to be stupid beyond comprehension.

*--If the bad guys are going to insist on doing this -- and I bet bad-guy gangs probably do act this way because they see so many movies that tell them they should -- then they should just send the baddest-assed bad guy out first, because if she kicks HIS ass, well then, there's not much point in the rest of the bad guys giving it a go with anything less than a flamethrower, is there? Run away! Run away!

(No, no. It was more like, she would send a rocket grenade into a big circle of men, and then come in with an Uzi and finish off the guys who were still breathing. I don't think she faced off against more than one guy at a time. So, it was TOTALLY realistic. -- DR)

Posted by: , at August 27, 2011 10:30 AM

"He is the gaping genital sore of leading men [...]"

Well done sir,well done.

Posted by: MachineGunJeanMaurice at August 27, 2011 11:29 AM

Posted by: =DocDoom1= at August 26, 2011 12:43 PM

I've always thought that Saldana looked exactly like a cross between Thandie Newton and Jada Pinkett-Smith. In other words: Extraordinarily hot!

(And isn't it hilarious that she got her start in the awful Britney Spears movie? That was her, wasn't it?)

I would go see this, though I do agree that she should have had a better actor cast as her fuck buddy than Michael Vartan (who is cute but somehow totally uninspiring). I'm thinking Idris Elba. And in totally unrelated news, I need a new vibrator. Gotta go!

Posted by: Lisa at August 27, 2011 2:11 PM

Am I the only one who found some bitter twist of irony in the fact that, not only is Zoe Saldana undeserving of such a low film, but she's also apparently not entitled to a proper header picture (as Scott said, it's from The Losers) for said mediocre film's review? Guys, I know we all want to fuck her, but come on now. This isn't the way to go about it.

Posted by: duckandcover at August 27, 2011 10:55 PM


She was trained by a criminal to became a criminal, who kills criminals for killing her criminal parents. In other words she is exactly what she hates. Either that or she in fact has no qualms with the criminal life itself only to those in it who affected her negatively.
Posted by: bleujayone at August 26, 2011 12:15 PM

Are you a robot bleujayone? if A, then B, but Not C bleep blorp bloop. If someone kills your fucking parents, who cares what they were doing before it happened? Don't let logic be the enemy of thought.

Posted by: John G. at August 27, 2011 11:20 PM

Such good news. You have renewed my faith in you, Dustin.

Posted by: Nicolae at August 27, 2011 11:25 PM

John G.-

I grant you this is a movie who's plot takes great liberties with the absence of logic. Let me see if I can elaborate my previous post.

If you you do business with criminal activity- the possibility of being killed should be an expected occupational hazard. This review stated they were involved in a deal that went south rather than just innocent people with the bad luck of being in the wrong place at the wrong time. The difference being the first is asking for problems and the other is not. In terms of the child, yes she probably isn't really all that interested in why Mommy and Daddy are gone. Just that they are and someone is to blame. In this case though, when said child becomes an adult one might think she could sit back for a moment and think about her parents' wisdom in placing both themselves and her in harm's way in the first place. I would like to think that a well-developed character might stop for even just a moment and consider if its worth it to avenge people who seemed to willingly endanger their lives and the life of their child. Perhaps even have some unresolved anger with the dead parents for being so foolish and leaving her alone. But as mentioned before this is a mindless revenge movie that all but asks the audience to check their brains at the door. Again, I'm only going on Dustin's review here, but I'm fairly confident he didn't leave any vital details out.

To me this is like declaring war on a brewery because your parents irresponsibly got drunk and killed themselves in a car accident, or to be more ridiculous, being angry at bears because your folks ran around Yellowstone Park in Lady Gaga's meat wardrobe. In either case, maybe they didn't intend to die, but they put enough variables against themselves for that to be a strong possible outcome. They are partially to blame.

By the way, such a nice family she ends up inheriting. Her uncle not only is also involved in criminal activity himself, but takes a grieving child and essentially uses her to turn her into a weapon. Basically, she had no chance in hell at having any semblance of a normal life. In that sense, this movie isn't even a straight up revenge story because she's not just going after the people who did her wrong, she's going after anybody. And though the review suggests her career is assassinating "bad" people, that doesn't make her her actions any less evil themselves. But again I'm trying to look too deeply into what clearly is a kiddie pool.

I concede this movie is far from highbrow to begin nor is it very likely that it ever claimed to be. I am saying that it is difficult to identify with a character's motivations if they themselves do not stop and think about why they do what they do. To do otherwise suggests they become a mindless automaton (you know...a robot) of a character. (Kill Kill Kill) I'm not saying that's not possible, but often it's not very entertaining.

Posted by: bleujayone at August 28, 2011 12:49 AM

Thank you, Lexie! Too many people are giving Saldana grief about being petite and thus being unable to kick some ass. Guns aside, it is quite possible to beat the shit out of someone without being corded with muscle. A lot of martial arts don't focus on using brute strength to take down someone but rather application of balance breaks, pins and yes, pressure points. Self defense is all about ensuring that smaller people have a chance against bigger ones.

What was that old saying again? Ah, yes - The bigger they are, the harder they fall.

Posted by: Four Eyes at August 28, 2011 1:54 AM

I'm almost positive this broad can easily beat me on account of all the blood rushing from my brain down to my junk, thus making me dizzy and easy to defeat.

Posted by: Pookie at August 28, 2011 3:25 AM

No, there's really no way for me to ever believe that Ms. Saldana would ever have a chance in hand to hand combat against an average sized man who is also trained. I've trained for a number of years myself and have been in a lot of fights against trained and untrained people alike, sparring and for reals; I even got stabbed twice in a bar fight, but that's a story for another time.

She just doesn't have that much of a chance at winning with those odds. She's too small and too light both to effectively strike and grapple as well as being able to resist someone doing the same to her.

It's like that scene in Salt that ruined (well, finishing blow ruined, there was already a lot wrong with the movie) the whole movie. You know, where she has the showdown with Liev Schreiber who's like twice her mass a half foot taller.

Posted by: Salad_Is_Murder at August 28, 2011 5:52 AM

The difference I see between the incident someone mentioned above re beating the shit out of a man who tried to hustle her into his car and this kind of thing is, the attacker in the parking lot isn't expecting any resistance; certainly he's unlikely to know he's taking on someone trained in martial arts. But shouldn't the Bad Guys' Social Media Network have clued everyone in by now that Zoe is no one to fuck with? Do these guys not tweet, or email, or simply pick up the phone and tell each other: Do Not Fuck With This One, She'll Rip Your Lungs Out, Jim?

I mean, every criminal in the world knew of and feared Keyser Soze for a damn good reason. That, to me, seems more realistic. What was the line, "Criminals tell their kids: Be good or Keyser Soze will get you"?

I guess the key word there is "realistic."

I tend to decline to check my brain at the door for movies like this, because I'm always afraid they won't let me have it back.

Posted by: , at August 28, 2011 11:40 AM

Pookie sums it up better than anyone else ever could.

Posted by: MM at August 28, 2011 10:47 PM

There's key scenes in the first 15 minutes of the film - images that more or less scream at the viewer, "You're watching a comic book. It may not have superpowers and guys in tights, but it's a fucking comic. If you can't suspend disbelief, you should get the fuck out."

And it's like, Luc Besson. It's not going to be the height of Realism or Cinéma vérité. Buy a clue along with your ticket, critics.

This movie is a milder PG-13 issue of 100 Bullets in its early stand alone stories. Those weren't very good either, but it was outstanding single elements in that noir cheese that gave the writers another chance with the next issue.

My wife was entertained, as was I. Considering we've seen some really bad movies for the sake of being a parent, this was worth the time and cash.

One last thing: "Hollywood finally gives us Bourne with a bra . ." Bullshit. She didn't wear a bra for most of the movie.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at August 29, 2011 12:55 PM

Agree Karla. Why didn’t luc Benson just call the movie Frenches revenge and use Zoe Saldana as the main character. I mean their are Afro French people who live in France and speak French fluently.Example Cheick Kongo is Afro French. In fact they speak better french than Zoe can speak Spanish. I mean Paris is a hub or Drugs and guns and illegal activities like the drug trade.

Instead of trying to ruin Colombia’s beautiful image and people & the Latin culture why not just taint his own French culture. Also their is Afro English, Afro Japanese, Afro Chinese, ect ect but lets be clear. While their is all these people when you think let say of Japanese you don’t think of Afro Japanese even though their is some just like Zoe doesn’t pop into you mind when you say Latina. You think Sofia Vergara, Eva Longoria, ect ect. I mean their is a Afro Colombian population and they have tried to keep their roots & original language. Look up Palenque in Colombia on youtube. These people are honorable people who are way more inspiring then Zoe Saldana but have had to fight to keep their culture alive & fight being Latinized because many are not seen as part of the Latin community. Maybe the rich and famous & successful but that is about it.

Just copy and paste the link below on youtube.

Palenque San Basilio, Bolivar, Maroon Community in Colombia

Posted by: LeBraun at August 29, 2011 7:17 PM