web
counter
 

Batman: Year One Review: Maybe Gotham's All I Deserve. Maybe It's Just My Time In Hell.

By TK | Posted Under DVD Reviews | Comments (12)



y13.jpg

Batman: Year One is yet one more excellent entry in DC Animated’s pantheon. Coming off the success of last year’s excellent Batman: Under The Red Hood, it’s another adaptation of the character that’s taken directly off the page. In this case, co-directors Lauren Montgomery and Sam Liu (who previously collaborated on Justice League: Crisis On Two Earths) undertook one of the more challenging offerings out there - Frank Miller’s legendary graphic novel about the birth of Batman and the personal trials of Bruce Wayne and Jim Gordon.

What made the comic book so striking, in addition to its fierce, hard-lined art style, was that its story was far more grim and dark than many previous tellings. Furthermore, it spent a large part of its time describing the events from Gordon’s perspective, allowing him to serve as a chorus not only for his own life, but for the growth and subsequent corruption and decay of Gotham City. The film is a near-perfect, direct adaptation, an unflinching look at the seedy underbelly of Gotham City (you’ll notice many scenes served as inspiration for Christopher Nolan’s films), and the development of its two greatest defenders, albeit ones who come from very different places. The film pulls no punches as it depicts Gordon as a dedicated, determined hardass who transferred from another city under a dark cloud, who wants to just step in line and follow along, but can’t bring himself to suffer the injustices and dirty dealings of Gotham’s police force.

At the same time, Gordon isn’t a perfect citizen by a long shot, and Year One also deals with his ill-advised extramarital affair with a co-worker (voiced by Katee Sackhoff), and the danger that his stubbornness and mistakes bring upon himself and his family. Interestingly, the Gordon side of the story is far more engaging than the Bruce Wayne side. Wayne is interesting enough, I suppose, but part of the disconnect stems from everyone’s collective knowledge of the Wayne/Batman dynamic. Gordon has a great deal more complexity to him, and it’s aided by the fact that the voice actor, Bryan Cranston (“Breaking Bad”), delivers his performance with far more grit and nuance. Which isn’t to say that Benjamin McKenzie is bad as Batman/Bruce Wayne, he’s just not nearly as good.

Similarly, the character of Bruce Wayne is a far less intriguing character once you pull away the cape. However, it’s still exciting to watch, and the stripped-down, tech-free Batman is always a novel take on the character. Bat-shurikens aside, Batman does little more than use his smarts and his brawn to get through his early adventures (eventually even having to steal a motorcycle for transportation), and watching him develop his knowledge and techniques was a joy. The remaining characters all perform admirably, including a minor but enjoyable part for Eliza Dushku, playing the prostitute/thief Selina Kyle/Catwoman. It’s a full-blown badass role, depicted as a smart, street-tough woman who can hold her own against the toughest of foes, but who lives down in the dirt because she’s given up hope on the city. The dialogue crackles with a hard-boiled intensity, and there’s an air of desperation and hopelessness in the novel that successfully transitions to the small screen.

But at the end of the day, it’s an animated movie, so it lives and dies by that animation. As has become the norm with DC animated fare, the animation for Year One is spectacular — not to mention a perfect example of the page come to life. It’s a washed out, dulled palette of grays and browns interspersed with occasional bursts of color for sharp contrast, showing Gotham as once a city of industry and innovation, and now more a blasted-out land of decay and decrepitude. Not to say it looks like a warzone, but more like a once-great monument that is crumbling all at once. The character animation is all hard lines and sharp angles, designed to create both a retro appeal but also to eliminate the possibility of mistaking this is a kid’s movie. Yet despite that seemingly dreary art design, it’s still a beautiful picture, and the characters move with a harsh grace that’s remarkable. Batman’s huge showdown in a collapsing building, as the cops storm in from all sides, is a harrowing and intense scene, aided by the stellar animation and the fluidity of the movement of the characters.

Despite its title, Batman: Year One is Jim Gordon’s show, and that’s not even remotely a bad thing. Cranston nails the character almost as perfectly as Gary Oldman does in Nolan’s films, depicting him as a flawed, world-weary but well-intentioned warrior who wants his life back, and sees saving the city as his salvation. Batman is on the forefront, to be sure, and is well-rendered, but it’s nice to see Gordon get his moment to shine. Batman: Year One is yet another fantastic animated entry from DC, a slick compliment to the novel that keeps the tone of the live-action films, but still manages to make its own mark in the crowded Batman universe.

P.S. - the DVD also includes a short film starring Dushku’s Catwoman. It’s fun, exciting, has an absolutely brilliant chase scene, and is decidedly not for children. Enjoy.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



"The Walking Dead" - "Bloodletting": Get Busy Living Or Get Busy Dying | Christina Hendricks Continues Her Campaign For Most Perfect Woman Ever. This Time With Scotch.









Comments

Thanks for the review, and I probably going to buy this outright.

Header pic is so dark as to be invisible.
~~~

Posted by: Meander at October 25, 2011 12:33 PM

I really hated it - everything just felt off, it came across as really pointless and a much less elegant version of the book - something was just lost in the translation.

Which was disappointing because clearly what is there is good. I'd happily recommend to someone who hasn't read the book.

Irritating, as I was really looking forward to seeing this done right - but much as the All Star Superman one just didn't bring the beauty across so did this loose that unknowable.

Posted by: PyD at October 25, 2011 12:52 PM

I was tempted to buy this last week, but I've been burned by animated fare before. Thank you for making my decision.

Posted by: admin at October 25, 2011 12:54 PM

Header pic is so dark as to be invisible.

That's how Batman likes it.

Posted by: Lauren at October 25, 2011 12:59 PM

To sum up the cartoon :

Jim Gordon is bamf who completely overshadows Batman in every aspect including asskicking. And this is a good thing

Posted by: YesPlease at October 25, 2011 1:40 PM

Y'know, I've got to both agree and disagree with PyD.

I thought "Year One" was pretty perfect, and it was hard not to make it so based on the cinematic scope of the original story. Frankly I'm surprised "Year One" wasn't produced earlier due to the "paint-by-numbers" ease in which it lends itself to the screen. Cranston was great, not-Cranston was good (I even heard some snippets of Kevin Conroy-eque Batman in there), and Dushuku was better than I thought.

Still, like "All-Star Superman" before it, the challenge in producing a 60-70 minute film based on something so dense means you're not going to include everything. "Superman" felt a little hollow, though I loved it, and so too did "Year One".

This is not an excuse to ignore either...it's just that IMHO "Year One" was about as good as I expected. Maybe the problem is it wasn't GREAT.

Still, it is most worthy of praise and should be considered so. Also, if there is a "Year One" film or TV series, I want Cranston in as Jim Gordon. Period.

Posted by: Green Lantern at October 25, 2011 1:59 PM

Still, like "All-Star Superman" before it, the challenge in producing a 60-70 minute film based on something so dense means you're not going to include everything. "Superman" felt a little hollow,
It didn't feel so hollow to me as more of hmm how to put it.... badly written fanfic who's sole purpose is to help Superman fanboys masturbate more easily to the image of their favorite boy in red and blue. Or to put it more simply the cartoon equivalent of Twilight

Posted by: YesPlease at October 25, 2011 2:07 PM

I'm pretty sure the script to All-Star Superman used actual punctuation and knew the difference between "whose" and "who's" though, so it couldn't have been that badly written.

Posted by: Craig at October 25, 2011 3:40 PM

PyD, as a Batfan since the 60's and obsessive comic collector I was expecting my reaction to be much the same as yours. There was no way they could bring the power of those pages into motion. I was so wrong.

This and Return of the Joker are the two best DC animated movies so far. This was everything I liked about the comic with great voices and excellent pacing and animation.

Posted by: Adam C. at October 25, 2011 5:52 PM

Haven't seen this yet; it's on my Netflix queue. But I've been immersed in the Batman: Arkham City game for the past week, which is a damn fine piece of Batman storytelling. And fun too.

Posted by: space oddity at October 26, 2011 12:07 AM

Personally, I don't get it; this wasn't a good film, period. While I do agree, Cranston and the animation is great, the whole movie is disjointed, in what I call the "Watchman syndrome". They simply tried so hard to present the movie as the comic did, it became more or less a disjointed... thing... that perambulates across the screen like a minstrel with a short-term memory disorder. The comics were presented as a short serial, which explains for its nature, but the film had no excuse. It's supposed to have been a linear story that exposed the duality of Gotham and the justice system it possesses in the form of Batman and Gordon, but instead they proceeded to masturbate to the fans, saying "WASN'T THE COMIC GREAT! NOW YOU WOULDN'T HAVE TO READ THOSE TINY WORDS TO ENJOY THE COMICS!"

Granted, I never thought the comic was that great either. As much as I love Sin City (the comic, although the movie's pretty great too), Frank Miller just doesn't come across as a great writer, not to mention the fact he can't seem to handle anything without a prostitute in it, so much as to turn a wealthy (and bored) socialite that goes cat-burgling into a prostitute, just because.

There's also the voiceover. When in the hell are people going to realize you're supposed to show, not tell. I blame the elementary school system and their methodical use of the perpetuation of "show AND tell". Bastards.

Posted by: FDBluth at October 30, 2011 10:09 PM

batman is one of my favourite comic book,because he is the smartest one !he is the brain of the JLA ,and he always finds way to kick his enemy's ass no matter what ...even the darkseid as well ...this character is freakin awesome man !

Posted by: Jennine Valois at November 13, 2011 12:08 AM