web
counter
 

Rape and Hollywood's Gravitation Toward Clunky Similes

By Courtney Enlow | Posted Under Celebrities Are Better than You | Comments (77)



0_62_depp_johnny_030807.jpg

Ah, rape. The Hollywood star’s answer to Godwin’s law.

Celebrities get their photo taken a lot. Sometimes this is wanted, sometimes this is not. And I’m sure that when it’s not, it sucks. It must be an enormous violation of one’s privacy and incredibly dehumanizing.

But it’s not rape.

Unfortunately, Hollywood people don’t quite get that. They live in a completely different universe where our version of bad things and theirs are incredibly disparate. That’s why some of them freak out at waiters for one miniscule flaw in their meal, or ream extras for looking them in the eye. Their idea of terrible has been skewed by existing in a bubble of wealth, fame and fancy outfits. (Kevin Smith’s “It’s 3am in Minnesota. I need a camel.” story pretty much sums this up)

So, certain celebrities with preternaturally awesome lives do not quite understand the concept of actual awful things that ruin the lives of those to which they happen. And one of those awful things is rape. And that is why they often compare rape to the act of getting their pictures taken.

It’s one thing when someone lame does this, but it’s another thing entirely when it’s Johnny Depp, who wasn’t even speaking of paparazzi, but rather paid photo shoots, as in photo shoots he gets paid to do.

JOHNNY. HONEY. WHY?

In a recent interview with Vanity Fair, he said this stupid shit:

“Well, you just feel like you’re being raped somehow. Raped … It feels like a kind of weird — just weird, man. Whenever you have a photo shoot or something like that, it’s like — you just feel dumb. It’s just so stupid.”

Did anyone else’s vagina just manage to climb inside of itself? Impressive, right? Yes, that header photo? Total rape.

He’s not the first. He won’t be the last. Kristen Stewart did it last year, Mila Kunis did it to a lesser extent this past summer, and of course pretty and perhaps less bright than one would hope people like Sofia Vergara and Jason Momoa have made seemed-like-a-good-idea-at-the-time rape jokes here and there.

Why do people keep saying this shit? Why do people write it off so easily because they’re famous and therefore dumber than most other people? What’s the line between dumb offhanded joke and vile overstatement that spits in the face of those who’ve actually had their lives forever destroyed by that act? Are we just waiting for someone to add the words “…a baby” before we’re genuinely upset with them that they dared compare their jobs to rape?

So, Hollywood, if you’re listening, I’m sorry your lives all suck so bad. But they’re not THAT bad. So shut the fuck up about it.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



5 Shows After Dark 10/4/11 | Too Sexy To Die: 10 Characters Who Were Saved By Their Sex Appeal









Comments

The Sofia Vergara rape quote is something that simply doesn't translate culturally. "Rape" in English (in the US) and the word "Rape" in Spanish (Colombia) have very different emotional connotations. Technically they mean the same thing, but it's just not as heavily charged word in Spanish. There is a whole "can't admit I had sex out of wedlock so we'll chalk it up to me not REALLY wanting to" thing that's hard to understand unless you're familiar with the culture.

The Johnny Depp thing, I dunno... maybe he meant it feels dehumanizing? Not to defend the guy, but he's never struck me as insensitive.

Posted by: the other Courtney at October 4, 2011 2:12 PM

Agreed, it really pains to me see actors I like and respect being so crass and insensitive and just plain dumb.

Posted by: Nieve 'The Threadkiller Queen' at October 4, 2011 2:13 PM

Sometimes people say stupid shit. Sometimes it's established "nice guy" Johnny Depp.

I think we may end up creeping towards the inevitable discussion about forgiving the stupid comment because for some reason you otherwise "like" the person who spat out the offending idiot remark.

Sometimes it's Johnny Depp who offendeth and sometimes it's Michael Richards or Mel Gibson or fill in your personal umbrage blank.

Posted by: klingonfree at October 4, 2011 2:15 PM

Oh, bullshit, on this.

I just finished reading about the magazine article online and Depp was just using an extreme word to describe something extremely uncomfortable for him. Kinda like a little girl using the word 'amazing' to describe even the most unamazing shit.

No call here for righteous indignation of any kind.

Posted by: GMan at October 4, 2011 2:20 PM

Fame does not equal intelligence.

Posted by: , at October 4, 2011 2:29 PM

There are two flaws in your analogy GMan. First is that while a child (or adult for that matter) may inappropriately use a word, "amazing" doesn't quite carry the same connotation as "rape." Also, a child can be forgiven for not knowing any better. Depp is a grown man. He doesn't have that excuse.

I don't think anyone is disagreeing that a photo shoot can be a humiliating, dehumanizing thing. We just expect some people, including Depp, would know better than to use a word that carries so much baggage.

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at October 4, 2011 2:31 PM

Barf. Well, that's rape culture for ya. Even the most likable of famous folks (and regular folks) aren't exempt from it.

Posted by: Angeleno Ewok at October 4, 2011 2:31 PM

Granted, I'm not the biggest fan of political correctness, but if he's referring to paid, pre-arranged photo shoots as opposed to being stalked by paparazzi, wouldn't the proper metaphor be prostitution and not rape?

Posted by: cinekat at October 4, 2011 2:33 PM

Johnny, I love you, but that was one fucking idiotic thing to say. Stick with the old stolen soul thing. Nobody gives a shit about souls anymore.

Posted by: Cindy at October 4, 2011 2:37 PM

Actors can be fucking dumb-asses, even the generally nice and well-meaning ones. Film at 11.

Posted by: MM at October 4, 2011 2:38 PM

So, Hollywood, if you’re listening, I’m sorry your lives all suck so bad. But they’re not THAT bad
So you have both been raped and are a A-lister Hollywood star who knows the feeling of your most private moments being violated by paprazzi or even the feelings you get from a high profile photo shoot?I mean you must oterwise you are doing the same thing that you are accusing the stars of right? Talking out of their ass about things they have never experienced and can't possibly comprehend?

Posted by: YesPlease at October 4, 2011 2:43 PM

It's definitely an insensitive thing to say, but I don't think I'm going to bother holding it against him. For whatever reason, it seems that people casually throw the word around these days. I can't even count how many times my friends have claimed to have "raped" me in a competition.

True story, I was playing XBox Live with some friends and a 7-year old showed up on our team. He spent the entire time complaining that he was being raped by our opponents. It was uncomfortable.

It's all over the place. Remember that skit on SNL where Will Ferrell plays the hugely abusive boss? At one point he shouts: "I'm this close to raping you!"

My point, if I have one, is that society in general tends to throw the word "rape" around without taking the time to think about the people who have actually been the victims of a rape.

Johnny Depp should have known better, but I'm not going to write him off for something that so many people casually get away with. If the amount of press this interview has gotten is any indication, he is already painfully aware of what a stupid thing it was to say.

Posted by: Pfft at October 4, 2011 2:51 PM

Also, YesPlease makes a good point.

Posted by: Pfft at October 4, 2011 2:54 PM

I think the whole issue is being overblown. Yes, Depp probably should have used the word "violated," and even that wouldn't have been entirely accurate (as cinekat points out, Depp is more of a "whore" in this regard, though certainly he might feel uncomfortable about being one). But are we really going to waste our righteous indignation on this -- an unfortunate choice of word? Who of us hasn't ever said anything insensitive?

Posted by: jimbob at October 4, 2011 3:01 PM

Ah its fascinating to me how some celebrities get a pass for this clueless behavior and some dont.

Posted by: logan at October 4, 2011 3:08 PM

I wish people stop comparing rape to things that are not rape. Eating meat is not like rape, Natalie. Getting pictures taken is not like rape, Johnny.

Ask any rape victim.

Posted by: The Dude at October 4, 2011 3:10 PM

celebrities are followed day and night by microphones and what they say goes into print and then across the web. that once in a blue moon someone might say something not thought out, or while searching for a word ended up with a insensitive hyperbole doesn't seem a great justification to go to war in a frothy rage.

hell, on this website barely a day goes by that someone doesn't say their childhood is being raped by a remake.

it's hyperbole. like when we say someone has murder in their eye, we aren't really accusing them of being homicidal

people who have been hurt suffer all kinds of things that others cannot imagine, and can be sensitive about a great many things, justifiably so. but there are limits to how controlled and buffered the universe is going to be.

people make thoughtless comments and analogies for emphasis every day. i'm sure soldiers don't love when people make PTSD jokes over a rough day at the office, and many people get offended when autism is lightheartedly used as a synonym for socially awkward. (the list here is potentially endless)

there's never going to be a perfectly sanitized offensive to no one language

Posted by: idleprimate at October 4, 2011 3:17 PM

De-lurking ...

I agree with those who are saying it's being way overblown. Yeah, it was a stupid thing for him to say. Does it mean he's insensitive to rape and the victims of rape? No.

Take for example: cancer. I have had cancer. When someone in a movie or a TV show says "I hope you die of

Now, I don't think people should go around making rape jokes. And I realize there is a difference between cancer and rape, therefore a difference between jokes about cancer and rape. I just think in today's 24/7/365 media, jumping on the first "offensive" thing someone says is lame and boring.

Posted by: Kelly at October 4, 2011 3:19 PM


And what Lucas did with the Star Wars prequels wasn't rape either.

Posted by: cockroach at October 4, 2011 3:21 PM

Oops. Used tags the wrong way. Third paragraph should have concluded "I hope you die of ... cancer" and then people laugh, I flinch at first and then, if the punchline is funny, I laugh. Cancer isn't funny. But not being able to joke about cancer is worse.

Ugh. First comment ever on a site I've enjoyed for years and I fuck it up. My apologies.

Posted by: Kelly at October 4, 2011 3:22 PM

He did also defend Polanski so I am not surprised that his choice of words for his ridiculous, pampered photoshoot includes rape. Gazillionaire movie starts should stop comparing their silly obligations to violent, sexual assaults. This comparison IS a big deal, not just a slip up. He should know better that this is offensive to people who have been actually raped. If you guys are so willing in letting him to 'casually get away with it' then these people will not learn to stop throwing rape away as a flippant comment in their safe, perfectly lighted sets.

Posted by: vallo at October 4, 2011 3:26 PM

Jesus, people; it's hyperbole. (Albeit the worst possible example of it.) Celebrities can't find the appropriate words to communicate how they feel violated, so they jump on the EXTREME hyperbole wagon like utilizing a word like 'rape' off the cuff.

I don't think they're trying to be purposely insensitive, but I think they need to knock that shit off already and buy a thesaurus.

Posted by: readrick at October 4, 2011 3:29 PM

Oh god, this is going to be a shitshow (the comments, not the post, which I appreciated).

Maybe we could just agree on the following:

1) It is a bad idea to compare things to rape.
2) It is a bad idea to compare things to rape even if you are Johnny Depp.
3) A lack of bad intentions does not mean you are immune to criticism. The fact that we kind of understand what you are getting at does not mean that the words you used stop being offensive.
4) Acknowledging that Johnny Depp said something that is, at a minimum, really insensitive does not mean you need to shun him forever (or even at all!).
5) The fact that this was "just words" or that "everyone says stupid stuff" does not mean that we shouldn't call out shitty things people say. It isn't overreacting to point out that this is a common analogy and a really bad one.
6) It is in fact possible to talk about feeling violated or vulnerable or about something bad happening to you without using the word rape. And if you have trouble doing so, I suggest your problem could be better remedied with a thesaurus than with an offensive analogy.

Posted by: Artemis at October 4, 2011 3:30 PM

Maybe we should invoke Whoopi's distinction:

"Rape", N, Forcible sexual congress. An unforgivable act of deliberately demeaning violence, entangled with sexual roles and cultural norms, chosen vs. other violent options to reinforce ownership, possession and despite.

"Rape-rape", N, Occasional passtime of scampish good-time directors, using drugs to make it go easier for under-age girls (while conscious, anyway) who probably wanted it, besides what do they think goes on in Hollywoodland anyway?

Oh, wait. I got that backwards, I think. Who do we like, again?

I'm not a fan of PC-policing movie quote posters out of college theater departments because somebody might get offended, but words mean things. "Rape" when not strictly descriptive is a powerful analogy to be used sparingly, I think. Over-use is one way the unacceptable thing is diminished, then accepted, and finally defended because it's something we've said, done, or tolerated, so it can't be that bad.

I'd hope that Depp, an actor and intelligent man, would reserve the language big guns for a powerful piece about big issues. Since it is an interview in Vanity Fair. I am not hopeful.

So, do we downplay the act because we like the actor or reconsider the man because of his actions?

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at October 4, 2011 3:31 PM

I get that he was just being hyperbolic. This interview isn't going to affect my decisions to see any of his future movies in one way or another. It's not a big deal to me. It's just a poorly thought out, off the cuff remark, but I can see why people would get upset. And you know what? When we (the little people) get caught offending someone with an insensitive remark, we usually just have to apologize, acknowledge that it was a mistake, and show people that it wasn't really what we meant. That's all I think he needs to do here. Maybe not at some big press conference, but if it comes up in subsequent interviews, there's his chance.

I also think there's at least a little bit of a distinction between telling a joke and what Depp's saying here, which seems to be serious. Not a huge one mind you, but at least with the jokes you can be sure that the person doesn't actually believe what they are saying.

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at October 4, 2011 3:36 PM

This doesn't alter one bit the mad crush I have on Johnny! It's just very disappointing to hear coming from him and hopefully he will acknowledge the situation for what it is--a poor choice of words spoken without thinking. We have all been or will be guilty of it sometime in our lives.

Posted by: NeoCleo at October 4, 2011 3:44 PM

1 in 6 women and 1 in 30 men in the US have been sexually assaulted (usually by someone they were in regular contact with) at least once in their lives (often when they were children). Rape is something that happens to a lot of people. Most people have a friend or family member who's been raped, whether they know it or not. This may come as a surprise to Hollywood, but rape survivors buy movie tickets. Survivors and their friends and families probably aren't going to pay $15 to watch a man who makes light of their pain.

Posted by: Inaras at October 4, 2011 3:49 PM

We've been here before.

Posted by: admin at October 4, 2011 4:01 PM

It seems to me some people are a bit too sensitive about it, he was figurative.
If he said he feels 'physically attacked' by paparazzi no one would have gotten his panties in a knot.
As I see it any kind of violence deprives the victim of his basic humanity.
'Rape' has become a serious no-no buzz word and everyone who uses it not in the most direct sense immediately tagged as insensitive and frowned upon.

Posted by: cruch at October 4, 2011 4:12 PM

@admin

Several times, sir or madam. Several times.

Posted by: ZombieMedic at October 4, 2011 4:13 PM

By your logic, YesPlease we are either to assume Depp has also suffered rape, or we can go right back to saying that comparing a paid gig where he gets his picture taken to sexual assault is a crappy and misguided thing to do.

Since I have had my picture taken in ways that are dehumanizing and make me feel objectified, I can honestly say that it is nothing at all like rape. It's like being dehumanized and objectified. You know what's like rape? Rape, and not any other goddamned thing. Not taxes or remakes or miscasting of your favorite childhood book or being forced to work on the weekend or anything besides actual sexual assault. Sort of like being shot is nothing like anything except being shot.

I am so very tired of hearing "he didn't mean it THAT way." Apply that to other offensive words/statements and get back to me on how we should give Mel Gibson - or Hank Williams, Jr. - a pass.

Posted by: Reba at October 4, 2011 4:13 PM

Is it really coming as a shock to people that Johnny Depp is faux-deep and not really all that bright?

Posted by: Craig at October 4, 2011 4:19 PM

I'm not defending his comments. I'm really not. And I absolutely get that rape is a complicated subject, a vile, repugnant, invasive, violating crime and that it requires the utmost of care and respect when being discussed. And, yes, I don't believe the word should be used quite so casually.

BUT with that said, what about murder? Isn't murder a horrible, repugnant crime that affects victims and their families? Are we drawing the same line? Is it unacceptable to say that "my team got murdered in the game last night"? Can that not be used casually either? Are we holding these things to the same standard?

Should we? If not, why not?

Posted by: Ghisent at October 4, 2011 4:26 PM

So hollywood people don't really take rape seriously? That explains their attitude toward Roman Polanski.

Posted by: Majicou at October 4, 2011 4:28 PM

I can't believe people here are blinded by Depp's stardom so they dismiss this comment. This is the same man who also defended Polanski, who raped a child.

If he made a racist remark you would be on his ass but "rape" is apperently nothing and can be compared to a bloody photoshoot.

Posted by: d at October 4, 2011 4:33 PM

We've been here before.
Posted by: admin at October 4, 2011 4:01 PM

And yet, here we go again.

Seriously, as someone already said, it isn't like we here on the internet are innocent of such "misuses" of language. We just don't have cameras and magazines immortalizing such things.

So I can assume that we are all free to call each other insensitive idiots who should know better the next time we joke about childhoods being raped? Or how about those declaration to get celebs pregnant? I don't think they have much choice in those scenarios. In fact, let's just cover any and all instances of possibly offensive language. Just to be on the safe side.

Jeez is this really going to be a thing now? You might as well censor TK completely if we are going down this route. Good thing Prisco left, he would be in prison at this point.

Posted by: Vermillion at October 4, 2011 4:41 PM

I am seriously confused by the people who are reacting like Johnny Depp is suddenly a rapist now, as opposed to someone who stuck his foot in his mouth. Maybe an eye roll and a pass for a guy who is, by all accounts I've ever read, a thoughtful and generous human being? Haven't you ever said something idiotic and immediately regretted it?

Posted by: TheEmpress at October 4, 2011 4:47 PM

Prisco left...? Huhwha? I live under a rock. Whyhow?

Posted by: klingonfree at October 4, 2011 5:11 PM

Oh my God. Johnny Depp said something stupid and shallow. Crap, before you know it these people might figure out that "Almost Famous" was not the greatest movie of all time and John Hughes was just a director of crappy 80's movies. What next!

Posted by: Phat girl at October 4, 2011 5:16 PM

Yes, we have all said insensitive and stupid things. But we don't have that sort of megaphone. If called out on our word choice or behavior, most of us will admit that we could have used different, better, more accurate words, or that we were in full out douche mode, and then we'll apologize for upsetting the person. I see very little in the way of that from public figures.

Are we supposed to be okay with politicians remaining silent while an audience calls for a sick man's death or boos a soldier for his sexual orientation? I mean, if we are to take no offense at words and assume only the best motivations for those who say them casually, then I suspect we will see more and more ethnic/racial slurs being tossed about without repercussion (as, in fact, we are seeing now). I guess that's okay with the rape apologists, too. If it isn't, why not?

Posted by: Reba at October 4, 2011 5:17 PM

I want to pop him on the back of his head and tell him to shut his mouth. Much like I did to my 12 year old last night when he said "asshole" at the dinner table. Can he speak that way with his friends? Yes, he can. At the table withi his family ? No, he cannot. The lines between private talk and public talk are blurry for him. He's 12.
So, when my sometimes bumbling, clueless tween stands up to some jackhole bastard on the bus who is making rape jokes and talking all kinds of shit "because that shit isn't fucking funny" and gets suspended from the bus for 3 weeks for his language while the rape-humorist gets nothing, I am proud of my kid and gladly work out his transportation until his punishment is overturned and the situation is handled correctly.
If my tween knows it's off-limits so should a grown fucking man. It's not cute, clever or comparable.

Posted by: Agogagogo at October 4, 2011 5:20 PM

Also, this is an amazingly civilized discussion, and one of the many reasons I love this site. Discourse is not dead, and we don't have to agree all the time for it to be okay to hang out.

Posted by: Reba at October 4, 2011 5:27 PM

@ Ghisent

I think the difference is that murder is virtually always recognized to be a serious and bad thing. Whereas rape is often talked about as a serious crime in the abstract, but when a real life situation arises it's excused, or minimized, or doubted, or outright ignored. So when rape is compared to things that are in no way comparable to it, it's both the result of and a contribution to the belief that a lot of rapes aren't a really, really horrific and inexcusable thing that is miles away from having your picture taken.

I also think that there's a difference between "my team got raped in the game last night" and "that photoshoot was like being raped". I don't like the former, which takes this terrible crime and uses it to hyperbolic ends, but at least it's clear that you don't actually think that what happened to your team was like rape. Whereas the way Depp and other celebrities have used the word to describe having their picture taken makes it sound like they do believe that it's a similar kind of violation (not the exact same, but similar).

(I would also guess, though I don't have data to back this up, that the word rape inspires a more personal and visceral reaction from victims of sexual assault than the word murder does from family and friends of someone who was murdered. That isn't to say that a loved one being murdered is somehow less painful than being sexually assaulted--I don't really think the two can be compared--but many victims of sexual assault even years later find casual use of the word rape really hurtful and traumatizing, whereas I know fewer people who have been impacted by murder who find casual use of that word to be as hurtful.)

Posted by: Artemis at October 4, 2011 5:44 PM

I think the point is that Johnny Depp is allowed to think and say whatever he wants. If he says something stupid, as he clearly has, his image will suffer, ticket sales along with it.

If he had pulled a Michael-Richards-style racist rant, he would no doubt be judged much more harshly.

That's the beauty of the viewing public. Some of us don't give a shit about the casual use of the word "rape" and some of us care very deeply. He is in the process of being judged and punished for his misstep as we speak, and we are the ones doing the punishing.

Posted by: Pfft at October 4, 2011 6:17 PM

Whereas rape is often talked about as a serious crime in the abstract, but when a real life situation arises it's excused, or minimized, or doubted, or outright ignored. So when rape is compared to things that are in no way comparable to it, it's both the result of and a contribution to the belief that a lot of rapes aren't a really, really horrific and inexcusable thing that is miles away from having your picture taken.

Well said, Artemis.

Posted by: The Dude at October 4, 2011 7:03 PM

I completely agree with this article. Making statements like this completely trivializes rape, regardless of ones intentions, however misguided.

Posted by: Aparently at October 4, 2011 7:12 PM

I have to give my own pat on the back here to Artemis. Thank you. You articulated my own thoughts on this matter much more eloquently than I ever could have.

Posted by: CC at October 4, 2011 7:13 PM

I'm not really angry about this one way or another because it's just a stupid view not a stupid act. I am surprised that Depp would say it because I thought he was smarter. I am also surprised at how many people give him a pass saying its off the cuff. No it was in an interview for Vanity Fair no one with a micro phone jumped him. Also it was a paid photo shoot one he could of passed on. He didn't then whined about it. I thought you were better Depp my mistake.

Posted by: logan at October 4, 2011 7:34 PM

That isn't to say that a loved one being murdered is somehow less painful than being sexually assaulted--I don't really think the two can be compared

But you ARE comparing them. Just like folks in this thread are comparing rape to racism. Which is just as offensive on BOTH ends.

If you don't think they should be compared, then don't compare them. And if you do that, then you can't try to defend a hyperbolic use of murder as being any different from one of rape.

Yes, we have all said insensitive and stupid things. But we don't have that sort of megaphone. If called out on our word choice or behavior, most of us will admit that we could have used different, better, more accurate words, or that we were in full out douche mode, and then we'll apologize for upsetting the person. I see very little in the way of that from public figures.

Uh, yes we do have such a thing. It is called the internet. Trolls, cyberbullying, fraud, naked photos and sex tapes; all kind of crap people get away with simply by being "anonymous". They are actually working on ways to make such activity illegal, under the guise of making people more responsible for the crap they let fly from their mouths. Even now, people are advised to monitor their online activity to prevent employers or such from seeing unflattering material attached to you. So yes, we do have a microphone for our most inane and idiotic of moments, and very little in the way of editing or apology can make up for it once it is out there. We just don't engender the same level of schadenfreude that a celebrity does.

You know what? Whatever. We go through this every time the media brings up a new supposed scandal. You people want to pat yourselves on the back to admonishing another "idiot celebrity with fame gone to his head" or whatever bullcrap you decide to throw upon him (since nobody here seems to know him outside of said celebrity window) on a random movie website, when it will have no real bearing on the people he supposedly insulted, have at it. Have your righteous indignation and choke on it.

Oh sorry, shouldn't say that. I will trivialize choking victims.

Posted by: Vermillion at October 4, 2011 7:43 PM

Why's he gotta be so pretty while he's saying stupid shit? Couldn't he have let this one rip when he had his longish, orangy hair, dark glasses and homeless hat?

Posted by: Cindy at October 4, 2011 7:47 PM

If photoshoots are like rape, that means rape is like a photoshoot, or if a team loses a game is like rape, that means that rape is like your team losing a game. Putting it this way round would be considered unacceptable by most people; why then is the former tolerated?

People should be held accountable for saying stupid shit. We don't know if he regrets it or not; we don't know if he even realises his choice of words was offensive or even problematic.

The difference between using the word "kill" or "murder" and "rape" as a metaphor is that the former are generic, not gender-specific. Rape (in most cases in the Western world) is associated with women, who are robbed of their choice and person-hood while men retain theirs. Casual use therefore contributes to a culture where it is acceptable to dehumanise and violate women, where rape is not considered to be serious.

Rape is something that is becoming more and more widespread as an analogy for a momentary inconvenience rather than a serious crime. If Johnny Depp apologises for trivialising the issue that could go a small way to changing this - but he won't do that unless people protest.

(And, unlike a lot of female actresses, particularly younger ones, he gets to keep most of his clothes on for said photoshoots.)

Posted by: Lily at October 4, 2011 7:50 PM

After the pass he gave Roman Polanski for drugging and raping a 13 year old girl I'm not really willing to make excuses for Depp. His world view seems a bit fucked up.

Posted by: Jules at October 4, 2011 8:28 PM

You people want to pat yourselves on the back to admonishing another "idiot celebrity with fame gone to his head" or whatever bullcrap you decide to throw upon him (since nobody here seems to know him outside of said celebrity window) on a random movie website, when it will have no real bearing on the people he supposedly insulted, have at it. Have your righteous indignation and choke on it.

Or we could just be having a discussion over the power of words, how experience informs our views, the constant trivializing of a crime that mostly affects women, and the places where our individual lines are drawn in terms of how we regard people who toss the word rape around as if it has no deeper meaning or cultural impact. But you apparently missed that part in your rush to condemn us for having an opinion.

Posted by: Reba at October 4, 2011 8:58 PM

as long as we are chatting about words, you drew an equivalence between rash hyperbole and rape apologist. somewhere else along the way rape became gender specific. there's been much holier-than-thou and good old fashioned self righteousness, you know, the kind that hammers on any dissenting opinion.

there are some polarized views here, but lets not pretend either side is in an open minded discussion.

From where I am sitting, it starts to sound a lot like your garden variety witch hunt.

Posted by: idleprimate at October 4, 2011 9:20 PM

From where I'm sitting, if someone is okay with trivializing rape and using the word to mean any minor inconvenience, and further insists that anyone who finds such thing offensive is somehow overreacting regardless of their reasons, then they're part of a culture of rape apology. That doesn't mean I think they condone rape; it means that making light of the horrific experience is akin to trivializing it, and attempting to shut up people who object to that is actively trying to marginalize them. I am not sure why victims of rape and those who help deal with that trauma are asked to stay quiet when the world belittles their experience, but it happens every time the topic comes up. Every single damned time. I find that interesting.

Posted by: Reba at October 4, 2011 10:00 PM

I’m not convinced that people truly change their behaviour until experience teaches them. I stopped casually using the word “rape” when it happened to a close friend- not just out of sensitivity to her experience, but also out of witnessing the nature of the real thing. There were few things in life I could compare rape to once I saw the lasting trauma first hand. People generally get the violation angle of the act itself, which is probably why it gets casually thrown about, but few ever consider whole, lasting truth when drawing hyperbolic analogies. It’s disappointing when a guy who uses words as a tool of trade couldn't demonstrate a little more respect in his choices but to be honest, I found his defence of Polanski more disturbing. That was an actual event, not an misapplied simile.

On a tangent: as the parent of a couple of autistic kids, I'd love it if everyone stopped casually throwing “retard” and it’s variants around as a clearly intended insult… until I remember I only refrained after they were diagnosed. I imagine casual observers would see the tics, the flapping, the physical and verbal struggles and imagine “what a cursed life”; and to a point that is true. But few would consider what I see: the oddball humour , the intelligence, the focus: the whole and wonderful human being within the shell. To have a part of who they are cast about as a casual insult is tough for a parent to bear, but I temper outrage with understanding that such things are more likely a product of a lack of experience than malice, as it was for me. People who meet the boys see them for who they are, not what. Hell, some even love them :-)

Empathy is such a tough lesson to teach, so I guess we need the occasional memorandum of understanding. "Nazism" has Godwin’s Law- anyone care to draft a convention for ludicrous rape analogies?

Posted by: Arkhams Razor at October 4, 2011 10:28 PM

That doesn't mean I think they condone rape; it means that making light of the horrific experience is akin to trivializing it, and attempting to shut up people who object to that is actively trying to marginalize them. I am not sure why victims of rape and those who help deal with that trauma are asked to stay quiet when the world belittles their experience, but it happens every time the topic comes up.

Well, I might as well condone it, considering all the negative connotations you attach to such comments.

Making a stupid comment does not mean a person condones rape, nor that they are contributing to the dissemination of rape culture. And stating that the supposedly moral outrage thrown at such a comment may be farfetched and over-exaggerated does NOT mean someone is trying to shut down any and all real discussion of the issue. I don't want you to shut up; I would like it if you'd reconsider the actual severity of the slight compared to your reactions. I am not trying to keep anyone from talking about rape at all. I am simply saying that there are much more effective points to take a stand on than this.

If anything, taking slight against a person because of an ill-advised comment (especially when the comment was not intended to be insulting, and not being the target of said insult) is also trivializing it, because it scares people who may actually WANT to have serious dissertation on the issue from doing so because they may say the wrong thing and get ostracized for it. And even if he apologizes or makes some act of contrition, nobody is going to accept it. They will simply sit and wait until he messes up again, and fling out another "toldja so". It might as well be as if he actually did rape someone.

Hell, with all the smarmy yahoos crowing about his defense of Polanski, it has already begun.

Posted by: Vermillion at October 4, 2011 10:53 PM

who is trivializing rape? if i don't lose my mind and go on a tirade when someone uses the word rape in a way i don't like, then I am part of rape culture?

do we now condemn people for ill-advised sentences? he wasn't joking about rape, he made a stupid comment about his own uncomfortable feelings being a commodity to be consumed. on the spot, in the moment, after being asked a question that we didn't see in the article that sparked this conversation.

you also make a bunch of assumptions about what i have or have not experienced because it is outside your imagination that anyone other than the enemy might disagree with you or feel that his single comment in a puff piece in a magazine was worthy of so much vitriol and malice.

since you have such a stringent code, i hope for your benefit someone polices your every word. oh wait, him describing his own feelings was unconscionable, but its really ok for you to go around calling strangers rape apologists and telling everyone how they may and may not express themselves. try turning the mirror on yourself once in a while.

Posted by: idleprimate at October 4, 2011 11:22 PM

Johnny Depp doesn't look at rape like normal human beings do. He's worked with a child rapist before with no moral dilemma even though he is a father. These hollywood people with their warped sensibilities make me sick.

Getting paid millions to promote a stupid movie is rape to him? He can kiss my ass.

Posted by: Candy at October 4, 2011 11:51 PM

yes, he was every girls favorite quirky star, until he chose a bad turn of phrase.

oh, and like hundreds of people on set, he took paying work with a director who committed a crime decades ago, one who by all accounts admits to the crime and fleeing a deal gone south. perhaps all those other folk just paying the rent should also head to prison for silently endorsing the crime by taking a rare good job.

yes, depp can afford not to, so where was everyone taking him down for that movie? oh right, its people who are indignant for ten minutes, like with this vanity fair article. but during that ten minutes, they are indignant, and righteous and terribly offended by the injustice in the world. wow, to have that energy to fight corporate rape of cultures and lands. to fight weak governments that only support the rich. sheesh, to do anything other than invest so much energy into freaking out over a badly chosen hyperbole about a soul chewing business. because all those other directors are really nice guys.

its an ugly grey world. let's lynch everyone who doesn't take a stand where we do. good thing i don't run things, i am an eco-fascist and would probably lynch everyone.

but it is always fun to watch people whip themselves suddenly into a feeding frenzy on a whim. have at it.

Posted by: idleprimate at October 5, 2011 12:15 AM

Sorry, but I'm tired of people going up in arms over the use of words they can't deal with. This is the problem of the hearer's not the speaker's.

And before we get into the whole "blaming the victim" argument, remember that no one was raped, ok?

No one, not even Johnny, really, really feels that the camera is raping them. That the photographer is bending him over the casting couch and violating him with his zoom lens. Anyone can see he's just trying to find a visceral word to describe his issues with something he doesn't like doing.

It's called hyperbole, isn't it?

Yeah, rape is horrible. So is being retarded. And this is a stupid as trying to ban the word "retarded" because it's offensive to people who are (mostly the relatives of people who are) retarded.

The idea that we all somehow have the right not to ever be offended or be made uncomfortable or hear a contrary word is retarded.

No offense to Courtney, but this is why people think the media make up controversies. Because they do.

Posted by: Protoguy at October 5, 2011 12:54 AM

More men get raped every day than women. This is a fact. It just deosn't count because the men getting raped are in prison. Rape is not gender specific to women - people who say that are disingenuous.

I read comments every day on this website that are outrageous. That is one reason I don't comment more often. I can't seem to muster the requisite level of hyperbole to get the attention I want. Just like every rational person I abhor rape and hate that it happens at all, but the definition of the word allows for its use in many circumstances. Look it up and the definition will say among other things, "any violation or abuse" and "the act of despoiling a country in warfare." That is why people say a team got raped. Because it is an accurate use of the word. It is possible to use the word rape without condoning the forcible sexual assault of another person. Any one who says otherwise is just plain wrong.

Posted by: jesuschrysler at October 5, 2011 1:18 AM

Roman Polanski should've been in jail almost 40 years ago. That fact that he nevewr served his sentence and still wins Oscars is an ethical and moral crime. The actors who work with him have no ethics themselves along with the people who work to put his films on screen. Almost no one in the hollywood community will stand up and say this. Its not right, yet get any actor out there and have them make a racial or assholic remark like Dirty Depp and there is quick outrage. It's a rightful response but. Its an asbackward community.

I can't understand anyone who wants to call out the people who take offense to these remarks. Getting paid millions of dollars to put on nice clothes and smirk or laugh with a mouth full of yellow teeth cannot compare to getting your body violated. I won't even get too much into it but some of these comments are making me upset because some of you have absolutely no idea. Words can hurt. These people in the spotlight need to check themselves and get their asses out of their heads. Just stfu, make movies, smile for the camera if needed, stop making clueless complaints and stop supporting child rapists or rapists period.

Rant is fucking over. I hope I got some kind of point across. I'm not in my best form tonight.

Posted by: Candy at October 5, 2011 1:42 AM

what do your remarks have anything to do with the discussion?

let me put it another way. fuck off martyr.

Posted by: idleprimate at October 5, 2011 2:03 AM

Christ, this got ugly fast...

Posted by: CC at October 5, 2011 3:41 AM

I sincerly hope that fuck off wasn't directed at me. I'm not going to get to calling out specific people because I'm expressing my opinion which some people on here doesn't seem to think its popular. Believe it or not, there are very many people who don't support the child rapist Polanski and won't endorse his films. It's not discussed everyday, but there are people that have standards and when the subject comes up, they express them.

I don't get the double standard in hollyowood. No one wants to work with Mel Gibson for example (remember he Hangover 2 incident?)and they freely admit that its because of his racist attitude, yet this pedophile gets accolades and the people that work with him suffer no consequences.

Put that aside. Johnny Depp is an insensitve asshole who obviously doesn't understand the horrors of sexual violation or he'd choose his words better, but judging from the company he keeps, he's incapable. My views can apply to others just like him but he's the one dumb enough to be quoted.

Allow me my freedom to dislike his fucked up mentality and others like him. That's if you were refering to me idleprimate

Posted by: Candy at October 5, 2011 4:18 AM

I dunno, from what I've seen, Johnny Depp is the exact opposite of "insensitive asshole". I may have been led by my nose by his PR team, but I distinctly remember reading a number of times how far out of his way he goes to be nice to his fans and people in general without making big press over it. The fact that I know that kinda deflates that last part itself, but I've certainly never heard negative things about him. Seems to me he's being unfairly labeled for no reason other than people like being outraged.

You can feel about him the way you like, but in my opinion, it's more about your beliefs and feelings about the word than his use of it.

Posted by: Protoguy at October 5, 2011 4:36 AM

To clarify: I know where it comes from, have been there myself and know that killing a word doesn't automatically kill a attitude- most times it seems to just replaces the word with a euphemism anyway. If I put a black line through everyone who chose an ill considered phrase, it would strike out an awful lot of people I like, myself included.

I wasn't born pure or ommiscient and don't expect anyone else to be, but I can't help what I react to and don't think it unreasonable to express it. If it's the only way to make your point, fine, you'll even get the benefit of the doubt unless you prove yourself a dick by other means. But if there is another way, a little consideration would be appreciated.

Posted by: Arkham's Razor at October 5, 2011 6:11 AM

Actually, I police my own words, and when I mess up, I apologize. Hi, nice to meet you. I work in an office that investigates discrimination, harassment, and sexual assault. I object when people say we live in a post-racial world. I object when friends send me "funny" emails that present degrading stereotypes (and most of those tend to be about how stupid men are, which is just fucking intolerable) and I have distanced myself from people who don't get why I find that unacceptable. I don't allow my kids or their friends to use words that mock the disabled, physical or mental, because I think that's cruel, and there are better words to use to express what they mean to say. So yeah, I have an objection to the word rape being used to describe a photo shoot, because I think it's really fucking insensitive. I am too aware of how many ways people hurt each other with words every single day to find it acceptable, and I don't have to give celebrities a pass just because I like some movies.

What I can't figure out is why my refusal to be okay with people staying what I consider to be stupid things should trigger such rage in other people. I keep hoping my job will lead me to greater understanding of that sort of mind, but ten years in, I'm still stumped.

Posted by: Reba at October 5, 2011 9:54 AM

I think it's incredibly interesting that the only people who seem really upset in this discussion are the ones claiming that people are overreacting to this comment. No one has said Depp should never work again or that he's the worst person ever. I think maybe one person said that they wouldn't go see his movies because of this. Everyone else who has criticized his use of the rape analogy has said some variation of "that was a stupid thing to say" or, at most, "I think less of him for having said it." If you consider that to be "losing your mind" over something, then I don't think people offended by Depp's comment are the ones who are too sensitive.

(I especially like the people who say that Depp is being treated like a rapist for this comment. I mean, it's sort of factually accurate in that most rapists are not prosecuted (if you don't believe me, look up the Department of Justices statistics on it), but in theory the consequences for rape would be something considerably more serious than some people on a pop culture site saying "man, that was dumb".)

On rape culture: rape culture is not limited to statements like "Rape is awesome! I am defending rape!" Rape culture is also all of things that, although they do not specifically condone rape, contribute to an atmosphere in which rape is tolerated or excused or, yes, trivialized. Saying "I'm not saying she deserved to be raped, but she went back to his place, got hammered, and took off her shirt, so what did she expect?" contributes to rape culture. Laughing about how a man being sent to prison shouldn't drop the soap contributes to rape culture. And saying that having your picture taken is like being raped contributes to rape culture. That does mean that anyone who has ever contributed to rape culture is in fact a rapist, or is personally responsible for the fact that rapes occur, or should be shunned. We've probably all contributed to rape culture in various ways at various times. That doesn't mean we shouldn't point it out when it happens, which is all that was being done here.

(And Vermillion, I was not comparing rape to murder. I was responding to a commenter who had asked if the use of the two words was the same, and I was explaining why I thought they were different.)

Posted by: Artemis at October 5, 2011 11:01 AM

Before anyone freaks out: that last paragraph should obviously say "That does not mean that anyone who has ever contributed to rape culture is in fact a rapist, or is personally responsible for the fact that rapes occur, or should be shunned."

Posted by: Artemis at October 5, 2011 11:02 AM

Johnny Depp apologized for his insensitive remarks.

"I am truly sorry for offending anyone in any way. I never meant to. It was a poor choice of words on my part in an effort to explain a feeling," Depp said in the statement. "I understand there is no comparison and I am very regretful. In an effort to correct my lack of judgment, please accept my heartfelt apology."

Well done, sir. Well done.

Posted by: Reba at October 5, 2011 11:41 AM

He sure did get that cover-his-ass "apology" statement out quick.

Posted by: buell at October 5, 2011 12:41 PM

What about those who contribute to asshole culture and seek to label otherwise good people over a poorly chosen word?

Posted by: Protoguy at October 5, 2011 5:48 PM

I love how society is so willing to take use of the word rape and make it into this ridiculous crime. Yeah Johnny Depp said something stupid. He's a guy from Kentucky that speaks with a British accent. He is stupid. But don't act like you actually care about the fact that people use the word rape to describe things other than rape cause not a damn person on here would bat an eye at two kids playing a video game and one of them saying "Man, I'm killing you." Because so many people want to make a pet project out of one aspect of our society without ever giving a damn about the society as a whole. Talk about killing each other thats fine. Say something about rape? I'm writing that rape apologist off for life. Grow up.


When YOU make the act of mispeaking about rape, as large of a crime as rape, then YOU trivialize rape. A person who says "I raped this team in Halo last night", and a rape apologist, and a rapist are three very very different things. To make them one thing does nothing but to increase your own self righteous indignation. It definitely isn't doing any favors for rape victims.

Posted by: Blank at October 5, 2011 6:19 PM

Poor Johnny Depp, he's getting raped by these comments!

Oooh.... too soon?

Posted by: Spoons at October 6, 2011 3:24 AM

I'm with idleprimate and Ghisent on this...it's an unfortunate analogy, but is it any worse than casually using "murder" "retarded," etc. Even if you say you felt like you got mugged in an exchange, a real mugging victim could tell you that it was nothing like that.

And lastly...to get all semantic - "rape" as a word can mean to violate, in a general rather than sexual sense.

Posted by: Sara Tonin at October 6, 2011 2:46 PM