web
counter
 

Kim Kardashian and the Other Hollywood Marriages That Hock Peanut Butter Loogies on the Idea of Your "Sacred Institution"

By Courtney Enlow | Posted Under Celebrities Are Better than You | Comments (30)



kim kardashian wedding 2011-1.jpg

Yesterday, after about two months, love died. RIP.

I honestly think it’s super cute people are reflexively asking “why?” Because bitch got paid, you guys. Almost $20 million for a giant publicity factory of a wedding that they didn’t have to pay one cent for. The Kardashians are whores, through and through, and I mean that in the purest sense of the word. They are products, a brand. They are not human beings. They sold that away. And it would be neat if this calculated act backfired on them and became their undoing, but for that to happen, they would need smarter fans. And they don’t have them.

Look, if I’m the one breaking the news that the Kardashians are faker than the extensions, Restylane and spray tans clamped to their gaping maws, then I may also be the one breaking the news that you’re really fucking stupid. And I’m so sorry to have to do that. Really. It just feels mean. Someone should have told you sooner. You deserve better. Stupid are people, too. Here’s some paper. Go color.

Sadly, Kim’s is not the only marriage to spit in the face of nationwide gay marriage. Every website on the planet today has a list of the shortest marriages in Hollywood. Some (I’m talking to you Carmen Electra and Dennis Rodman) were obviously for attention. Others are just indicative that the parties involved were dumber than a Kardashian fan, or maybe just kind of sadly naive. Probably both.

And, no, I, unlike every other giggling blog, am not including Britney’s 50 hour cry for help in Vegas in this discussion. Do you know me at all?

Now, in this time of reality TV and completely transparent, over-the-top PR moves, marriage is just as much a commodity as anything else. Shoe lines, weddings, babies, handbags, they’re all the same. Do you know how many people watched that god-forsaken wedding? 10.5 million people. And it would have been more had the family not sold the pictures to every magazine and website that would give them a dollar.

I want to blame someone so bad. But I really don’t know who or how, and it won’t matter. In the absence of anyone else, I choose to blame these two.

A21BA62212D4F36AA348E73C693A45.jpg

Fuck you, Darva Conger and Rick Rockwell.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Joseph Gordon-Levitt In The Dark Knight Rises, Does Bulletproof Fulfill The Vest Rider In His Contract? | Ron Weasley Almost Died, And Five Movie Sidekicks Who Should Still Be Alive









Comments

The Kardashians are whores, through and through, and I mean that in the purest sense of the word. They are products, a brand. They are not human beings. They sold that away. And it would be neat if this calculated act backfired on them and became their undoing, but for that to happen, they would need smarter fans. And they don’t have them.

You deserve a medal for that...

Posted by: Kenny G. at November 1, 2011 2:18 PM

And so, Harry and the Kardashian's comes to an end.

Posted by: gutpunchprod at November 1, 2011 2:19 PM

I don't want to sound stupid, but could I have some paper and go color, too?

Posted by: Meghan at November 1, 2011 2:31 PM

Maybe instead of banning gays and lesbians from marrying they should ban celebrities from marrying.

Posted by: John W at November 1, 2011 2:34 PM

I don't have any idea who any of these people are. And that makes me really, really happy.

Posted by: SBrown at November 1, 2011 2:40 PM

And yet it's the gay folk that are denied the right to marry.

The fact of the matter is for all the obscure bible quoting and moral citing they do, many people who object to gay marriage don't give a good goddamn about the sanctity of marriage. It's obvious they're just scared bigots. Marriage has been something that straight people have been able to do that gay people until recently could not. It was something these jackasses could lord over gays' heads as though they were more special. When the idea that gays could enjoy the same privilege as straights, the assholes among them cited that doing so would mean marriage would now be perverted- as though all the insults that straight people had already done to the institution never happened. Straights throughout history have been making marriages into mockeries of all sorts. And yet I NEVER see the degree of hatred expressed for those instances as I do for people who often don't even have the right in the first place.

I want every intolerant, bible-thumping, ultra-conservative, gay-bashing hypocrite to permanently shut their collective pieholes since they really cannot be bothered to say much of anything (if anything at all) when straight assholes take a piss on the concept of marriage. It's bad enough you lot are such assrags, but you can't even be consistent ones at that.

Posted by: bleujayone at November 1, 2011 2:44 PM

I used to see Rick Rockwell at the gym here every now and again and I'd invariably think, "Douche." I think it was like that thing when the doctor hits your knee with a little rubber hammer, but way funnier and less pain-y. And with more douchtastic-ness.

Posted by: klingonfree at November 1, 2011 2:44 PM

@bleujayone - Patton Oswalt did a bit on his "Finest Hour" album ("The Best Argument Against Gay Marriage)" you ought to give a listen to - he pretty much echoes your sentiments, in typical Oswalt style.

Posted by: edgartronic at November 1, 2011 2:50 PM

It is at least worth noting, if we are going to inject the gay marriage issue into this pop culture spectacle, that Kim & the Kardashians have lent their fame to support gay marriage and other LGBT issues.

There is plenty to criticize here and the inevitable gossip blog backlash is all well deserved, but it is unfair to lump them in with the other side in the struggle for marriage equality. The Kardashians are not the problem, and the argument for marriage equality has nothing to do with the wedding-as-publicity-stunt bullshit that these celebrities engage in.

"Kim and her sisters, Khloe and Kourtney, have previously endorsed marriage equality and have posed for the NOH8 Campaign, which raises awareness and funds for gay rights causes, including ending Proposition 8, California's gay marriage ban."

http://www.ontopmag.com/article.aspx?id=9960&MediaType=1&Category=22

Posted by: Yossarian at November 1, 2011 3:26 PM

Hey, at least someone is suing Kim Kardashian to prevent her divorce...

Posted by: Jerry at November 1, 2011 3:31 PM

A little off topic, but I'm not a loogie expert. How does a peanut butter loogie differ from your garden variety loogie?

Posted by: MM at November 1, 2011 3:40 PM

I already have some paper. Can I have some crayons, please?

Posted by: PDamian at November 1, 2011 3:42 PM

Stupid are people, too. Here’s some paper. Go color.

I consider this an insult to my 5 year old, an avid and skilled colorer who is already leaps and bounds smarter than the stupid people in question.

Posted by: katy at November 1, 2011 3:58 PM

And it would be neat if this calculated act backfired on them and became their undoing, but for that to happen, they would need smarter fans. And they don’t have them.

SMARTER fans? Are you implying their fans are already smart? Because all evidence points to the contrary on that one. I think I'm going to need to see some hard evidence before I buy into that particular theory.

Posted by: TylerDFC at November 1, 2011 4:01 PM

Yossarian-

The point was never about the Kardashians. The point was about people who object to gay marriage and using the argument that gay people marrying invalidates the legitimacy of all marriages in general. Given that some straight people, celebrity or otherwise, have done a bang-up job on that already, it seems very much a hypocrisy that those aforementioned voices of objection have been strangely silent when it come to those people doing essentially what they have already judged that all gay marriages will do.

And while it's nice that the Kardashians allegedly support gay marriage, I personally could not give one shit about any of their beliefs. As it is, I'm sure they'll have to draw straws to determine who has to tell Khloe the truth about the Easter Bunny.

Posted by: bleujayone at November 1, 2011 4:17 PM

Yosarrian - you're right that this stunt should really have no place in the argument FOR equal marriage rights. I think all we're saying here is that the lack of voracious, bile-filled commentaries decrying this as an attack on the "sanctity of marriage" is suspicious.

Basically, poking holes in the excuses anti-gay marriage folks like to use, but don't actually care about. An argument AGAINST anti-gay crusaders if you will.

Posted by: Bert at November 1, 2011 4:27 PM

I just think that, for as eager as everyone seems to be to make the connection between Kardashian reality TV marriage and gay marraige, it's a pretty weak argument to make.

For one thing, I'd bet that most of the fundamentalist Christians and conservatives who oppose gay marriage would also find fault with staged Reality TV marriages from vapid, promiscuous Hollywood celebrities with sex tapes who frequently showcase their immoral behavior on cable television in a seemingly endless series of television shows and guest appearances. It's not like the people lining up to advocate against same sex marriage go home to a DVR full of Kardashians. These are not the hypocrisies you are looking for.

I also think you're willingly arguing from a weak position if you try to undermine your opponent by saying "see, straight people have already perverted the sanctity of marriage so much that you may as well let the queers marry, too". There is a much better case for marriage equality that can easily be made without stooping so low.

And ultimately the struggle for gay equality is not going to be won by proving the hypocrisy or inconsistency or bigotry of the hard core "defense of marriage" assholes. Ironically, the real turning point in this struggle is the fact that vapid, inexplicably popular fame whores have no problem doing NOH8 photo shoots and dropping anti-prop 8 statements into their red-carpet blather. You see, this is where I differ from bleujayone. I think it is important that they do this. We the enlightened, compassionate intellectual minority may know that gay people are deserving of the same rights and privileges as anyone else but nothing is going to change if we are the only ones. To enact real change you need a cultural shift that extends this seemingly simple concept the big stupid mouth-breathing masses. You need sports radio hosts, reality TV stars, and Miley Cyrus to take up the message (for whatever stupid self-serving bandwagon-jumping, image conscious PR manipulated reasons they may have) because that's how you make it normal, which is what we want.

Make no mistake about it, the people who like Dan Savage will never accomplish this on their own. The people who like Kim Kardashian (or train wreck TV) can, and will.

Posted by: Yossarian at November 1, 2011 4:59 PM

@Yossarian - While I completely agree with you in that this dumb bitch probably is pro gay marriage (she's not dumb for that reason, just to be clear), I don't think that the issue is really whether she herself was spitting in the face of the gay community who desperately wants the right to do what she did so cavalierly for a few million bucks (okay, maybe she WAS spitting in their face a bit, albeit not on purpose).

I think the bigger issue is the massive hate machine that is the anti-gay movement which uses the 'sanctity of marriage' argument to further their cause every day. One of their main gripes is that allowing gays to marry will take a little bit of meaning away from straight marriages, which were intended for a man and a woman to share their eternal love under the Lord's protective gaze. All anti-gay marriage arguments are based in religion, which is why it's patently unreasonable for the government to even entertain the notion, given the whole separation of church and state thing. You don't hear anyone complaining that gay marriage makes their spousal medical benefits any less meaningful, or their joint tax returns any less special - it's all religious bullshit, which is fine for a church to endorse, but not the United States government.

ANYWAY, my point is, even if you do have the odd belief that someone else's marriage can have any kind of bearing on your own relationship, this bullshit right here does SO much damage to how marriage is viewed by espeically young people - it was egregiously false and more than that, it was a publicity stunt. Do these anti-gay marriage advocates honestly think that this sham of a wedding is doing less harm to the 'sanctity of marriage' than genuinely loving gay marriages?

Sorry to get all serious on a post about this ridiculous family, but on this issue I can go from 0 to Pissed Off with very little provocation. Also, I just saw Prop 8: The Mormon Proposition and the faces of those people sobbing when the ruling came down was absolutely heartbreaking and so unnecessary.

Posted by: Nicole at November 1, 2011 5:02 PM

@Yossarian again - Sorry, in the time it took me to finish my novel, there's been a bunch of activity and I just had to respond to a couple of things (not that I'm trying to fight - we're all on the same side basically).

First, I think that the Venn Diagram of People Who Hate Gay Marriage and People Who Watch the Kardashians would overlap more than you think. I know a couple of people who would fit into both categories and I bet a lot more of them exist.

Second, I don't think anyone is saying that 'well, these twats have ruined marriage already, why not let the gays do it?'. I think what we're saying is that the ARGUMENT about the sanctity of marriage is in and of itself utter bullshit, because there are a shitload of rushed, false, disingenuous, or otherwise 'not real' marriages out there as it is. If these people were really so concerned about the sanctity of the union, you'd think they'd be fighting against these marriages more than they do. The fact is, it's just a red herring so that they don't have to say what they're really thinking which probably boils down to 'ewww, two men getting married is icky' or 'i don't want to have to explain that to my kids'. So when something so egregious as this comes along and the Christian right isn't all over Fox News having a fit about it and demanding boycotts of E! Network, their entire agenda seems highly suspect.

Posted by: Nicole at November 1, 2011 5:16 PM

And again, it's not that I don't agree with you, but the arguments against gay marriage are inherently wrong and would be even if the institution of marriage remained a pure and sacred life long commitment unsullied by reality TV spectacle. It is wrong to restrict marriage to heterosexual couples only regardless of what happens on E! during fall sweeps. Kim Kardashian doesn't belong in the argument at all (unless she wants to lend her voice to normalizing acceptance and tolerance, in which case she gets a polite "thank-you-now-please-go-away" from me).

Posted by: Yossarian at November 1, 2011 5:22 PM

Kim & the Kardashians have lent their fame to support gay marriage and other LGBT issues.

My first thought, as soon as someone used this debacle to compare to the Gay Marriage Issue, was, "Wouldn't it be wonderful if this is some horrifyingly expensive, political statement made by the Whordashians showing the hypocrisy of protecting 'the sanctity of marriage'?"

Then I remembered who I was dealing with. And my hope died in a sadness swamp.

/ARTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAX

Posted by: Patty O'Green at November 1, 2011 6:12 PM

I mean if these two motherfuckers can’t make it, who can?

Posted by: Pookie at November 1, 2011 7:40 PM

For one thing, I'd bet that most of the fundamentalist Christians and conservatives who oppose gay marriage would also find fault with staged Reality TV marriages from vapid, promiscuous Hollywood celebrities with sex tapes who frequently showcase their immoral behavior on cable television in a seemingly endless series of television shows and guest appearances.

You left out humanists. How can anyone who thinks humans are exalted, who measures the world in terms of human excellence help but be appalled by vapid, promiscuous, fame-whoring ... etc.

And what is a humanist marriage but one person saying to another: "You. Above and before all else, I will take this trip with you?"

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at November 1, 2011 7:45 PM

I refuse to believe anyone over 18 thinks any celeb marriage is gonna last.

I also dont see what Kim getting paid by E has to do with gay marriage. Gay marriage is a real social issue. There is nothing about the Kardashians that is real.

I would also still like to have sex with Kim, physically she's my type, sadly I cant afford her.

Posted by: logan at November 1, 2011 7:47 PM

Here are my thoughts on all this.

When I first saw a picture of the both of them together, I thought she was marrying Blake Griffin. I'm glad that didn't happen. I actually like Blake Griffin. I have no idea who she actually married/divorced nor do I care to find out. Also I do enjoy the things that lasted longer that their marriage tweets. By which I mean I like the one tweet about Dora's pause after she asks you a question, lasted longer than their marriage.

Also the Tonight Show with Conan O'brien, right?

Posted by: googergieger at November 1, 2011 8:03 PM

I don't watch their show and I'm so glad for it. They make people who actually buy into their crap look really stupid and I'm glad I'm not in that number.

Posted by: Candy at November 1, 2011 11:45 PM

Wow, morons did something for money and more morons paid them, and even more morons paid attention. If she's not going to throw out some more pseudo-porn, she needs to go away.

Posted by: Protoguy at November 2, 2011 1:42 AM

demanding boycotts of E! Network,
---
This should already have been done for "Kendra!"

Posted by: , at November 2, 2011 2:03 AM

Patty, I was already having a bad day and now you make an Artax reference?

oh god

help me

please help me

*crawls into a corner and rocks back and forth*

Posted by: embertine at November 2, 2011 5:34 AM

It's all O.J.'s fault.

Posted by: , at November 2, 2011 11:12 AM