web
counter
 

Review: The Postmortal by Drew Magary: Eternal Youth Will Mess You Up

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (21)



The Postmortal.jpg

Drew Magary’s The Postmortal starts from a simple premise: A geneticist, attempting to isolate the gene for ginger-ness inadvertently stumbles upon “The Cure,” a treatment that stops the aging process. The Cure, initially illegal, floods the black market before the government — after much political and moral debate — eventually opens it up to the entire world with drastic and increasingly dire consequences.

Told from the distant future through the journal entries and article excerpts of John Farrell — a divorce lawyer with a cure age of 27 (meaning, he never ages past 27) — The Postmortal is best when its focus is on the dilemmas that The Cure creates, and the way in which the world reacts. It is fucking phenomenal sci-fi, meticulously examining the consequences of a society that never ages. Individuals are still capable of dying from disease, accidents, or murder, so in some ways, individual life gains more value; people are less inclined to join the military or engage in risky behavior because death means more than throwing away a life with 50 or 60 years remaining on it. It means throwing away the potential of infinite life. Moreover, divorce rates skyrocket — “till death do us part” gains an entirely different meaning when forever actually means forever.

In other ways, however, life loses value. Faced with the prospect of infinite life, there’s no longer any urgency. “The Cure” eradicates ambition, leaving the populace in a perpetual state of malaise and hedonism. The law lacks teeth; what’s 20 years behind bars when you have thousands more ahead of you? There’s also nothing to keep population in check; resources dwindle while the concepts of love, regret, and redemption lose almost all of their meaning.

Pitted against the “pro-cure” faction are the fundamentalist “pro-lifers,” who not only refuse The Cure but engage in terrorist activities designed to discourage eternal youth. They read initially like wackjob hippy tea-partiers, but as the novel progresses, and this incarnation of the world seems less viable and desirable, the ideological arguments of the pro-lifers gain traction.

What’s so remarkable about The Postmortal is how terrifying realistic it reads. How far is science from actually isolating the gene for aging and halting it (in the novel, The Cure is discovered in 2019)? And who would be granted The Cure? The super-rich, people under a certain age, everyone? The prospect of eternal life is compelling on an individual level, but chilling at a societal level, and Magary brilliantly navigates the forces at play on both sides.

Those familiar with Magary from his work on Kissing Suzy Kolber, Deadspin, or the half a dozen other online outlets for which he writes may be surprised at the depth of this novel, as well as the serious and grim nature of The Postmortal, although his blunt sense of humor frequently bleeds through. The use of journal entries is smart, allowing Magary to rely on the style of writing in which he excels: Short bursts of prose, dense but always vibrant. It makes for an engrossing and quick read (I knocked it out in under 24 hours) and tellingly, ideal for an eventual motion-picture adaptation (I’m shocked the rights haven’t been purchased yet). It’s an outstanding debut in serious fiction for Magary (who also wrote the hilarious but frivolous Men with Balls), a bold and challenging sci-fi novel that’s as entertaining as it is thought provoking.

(Full Disclosure: I write a weekly column for Uproxx.com, which owns Kissing Suzy Kolber, a website for which Magary writes.)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



"Doctor Who" -- "Let's Kill Hitler": The Doctor Invokes Godwin's Law | The 5 People (and Things) on Network TV I Miss the Most Right Now









Comments

It sounds awesome.

(Full Disclosure: it sounds awesome)

Posted by: superasente (Full Disclosure: my name is Matthew Conor Asente) at August 29, 2011 4:09 PM

I love the premise of this book because there are just so many pitfalls, but it's entirely realistic that it could happen (if available) because so many people are craving this kind of medicine (of course it would put the Botox people out of business). Does this mean that parents can choose to have their children remain children forever? And does one just physically stay the same age but with mental aging? Thankfully, I don't think there is an "aging gene" per se. I think it's more a sequence of regenerative processes starting to die off slowly as we age (not that there might not be a gene that triggers this) so it isn't a quick fix kind of thing.

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 29, 2011 4:26 PM

Oh my god! Superasente just gave away his secret identity! I agree with Mr. Kent, there. This sounds like an excellent read.

Posted by: Paultera at August 29, 2011 4:29 PM

I'll definitely pick it up. I loves me some "oh shit what did we do!" Science Fiction.

Posted by: admin at August 29, 2011 4:47 PM

ideal for an eventual motion-picture adaptation (I’m shocked the rights haven’t been purchased yet)

Seems like potential miniseries material. I'm thinking Bill Pullman, Lauren Ambrose, John Barrowman, and Mekhi Phifer. No? Just me?

Posted by: branded at August 29, 2011 5:56 PM

why is it that evry story involving eternal youth or immortality comes with a curse?
i would love to be immortal and young forever why can't they talk about the positives such as no death threats no murders or suicides no kidnappings.

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at August 29, 2011 7:50 PM

You'd still have death threats and murders and suicides and kidnappings. Eternal youth doesn't mean you're not going to die. You're just not going to age.

Posted by: BWeaves at August 29, 2011 8:36 PM

eternal youth plus immortality means can't die

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at August 29, 2011 9:04 PM

Superasente! What got into you??!! For a minute there, I felt like I was in a cyber-version of Truth or Dare. Anyway, nice to meet you.

This book will be an ideal Labor Day read. And I'd really like to see the movie, so, Somebody, get on it.

U Dynamo has a good point, though: Eternal-youth stories always end unhappily, but I see far more plusses than minuses. And even if we live forever, it's human nature to find something else to fill our souls with existential angst. We'll always have taxes. And sex, religion, politics...

Posted by: Stinky at August 29, 2011 9:13 PM

There is a movie version of this, isn't there? Starring Justin Timberlake?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efNzhEKm3w4

It's not exactly the same, but ... kinda sorta is.

Posted by: exploranora at August 29, 2011 10:02 PM

I know it's nit-picky, but the age he's stuck at forever is 29... it plays a role later on in the story.

Posted by: ThatGuy at August 29, 2011 11:07 PM

No aging gene, exactly. Rather, at the ends of each and every chromosome is a section of genetic material called telomeres. Every time the chromosome is replicated, the telomeres shorten. The telomeres protect the chromosomes and keep them from getting tangled with each other, so, when they get too short, cell division stops.

The telomeres in cancer cells, on the other hand, don't shorten (or their reduction is greatly slowed. Either way, those fuckers are basically immortal).

(And because this is science, and relatively new, that's not the whole story, or probably even the most accurate story, but they're involved somehow. We think.)

Is it bad that it kinda tickles me the original scientists were trying to find the gene for ginger? If my brain wasn't fried by an eleven hour cull-day, I'm sure I could come up with some clever quip about curing death and gingers having no souls.

Posted by: ScienceGeek at August 30, 2011 4:35 AM

It is a weird question to ask yourself, whether or not you'd opt for eternal youth. As a person with suicidal tendencies, I have trouble bringing myself to go to the doctor, and if I got a terminal illness I don't know that I'd seek treatment. I feel like there's a good chance I won't live very long anyway, so why invest so much trying to prolong a life that I may cut short? Voluntary immortality always gets me thinking about that shit.

Posted by: Lucas at August 30, 2011 9:26 AM

This seems like a good idea for a diversion: If you could live forever at any age you've been, which age would you choose and why? 18? 21? 29? 39? 54? (ahem)

Are there any advantages to living a little older?

(This presumes that you can keep on learning and that your mental faculties never fade. Ask people heading into dementia if they'd like to live forever.)

While I'm at it, I assume that because these people don't age doesn't mean they can't massively abuse their bodies by eating and drinking and smoking and mething themselves into a coma every day so that they may never age past 21 but they'll look 65. Kind of like how they do now. I though you said this was science fiction? *wink*

Posted by: , at August 30, 2011 10:42 AM

"This seems like a good idea for a diversion: If you could live forever at any age you've been, which age would you choose and why?"

50. Being 50 was fantastic (especially since I look younger than I really am). I was (still am) healthy. My face finally cleared up. My boobs finally filled out (I'm a slow bloomer). My confidence was at an all time high (still is). Men bow at my feet, still.

Posted by: BWeaves at August 30, 2011 11:35 AM

Sounds interesting. Especially since no one knows what happens after we "pass-on" I think it could be that we would all be total assholes if we lived forever, and the dying part is the only thing that makes us want to be "good" people.

Okay, I am sold. Is this on audio yet?

I'd pick 42, because that is the answer to life, universe and everything.

Posted by: MRod at August 30, 2011 11:57 AM

The concept is fascinating. Reminds me of some aspects of the Known-Space books by Larry Niven... with regular boosterspice, a human just doesn't age. If you can afford it, you can be immortal.

Actually, also brings up thoughts of the Takeshi Kovacs trilogy, and the Wellstone series, and so many more science fiction novels going all the way back to the classics like "Portrait of Dorian Grey".

Immortality doesn't always come with a curse... Immortality IS a curse. Because humans aren't just fallible, we're fundamentally flawed. Living forever just gives us more time to find creative ways to fuck it up.

Though I could see going the way of Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged...

Posted by: Wintermute at August 30, 2011 4:27 PM

The telomeres in cancer cells, on the other hand, don't shorten (or their reduction is greatly slowed. Either way, those fuckers are basically immortal).

Likewise with germline cells--sperm and eggs. If their telomeres shortened, then you'd pass on shortened telomeres to your kids.

Posted by: Jesse M. at August 31, 2011 12:05 AM

Being 50 was fantastic (especially since I look younger than I really am). I was (still am) healthy. My face finally cleared up. My boobs finally filled out (I'm a slow bloomer). My confidence was at an all time high (still is).
---
Bow-chicka-bow.

Seriously.

Posted by: , at August 31, 2011 10:35 AM

I downloaded this after reading your review and finished it in two days. This book is incredibly readable--it had me hooked at once. It starts out exciting, then becomes depressing, then scary and extremely sad. What's so frightening about it is how REALISTIC it feels--if an "aging cure" was actually invented, I find it easy to believe that shit would go down just as it is described in this book. I feel like I need a good cry after reading it.

Posted by: Purvis at September 7, 2011 11:23 PM

Great theme!

Posted by: sejenax at October 27, 2011 1:33 AM