web
counter
 

"Whitney" Review: Joining NBC's Comedy Graveyard in 3 ... 2 ...

By Sarah Carlson | Posted Under TV Reviews | Comments (33)



whitney2.jpg

I miss “Friends.”

That’s all I could think about as I trudged through “Whitney,” NBC’s latest attempt at filling one of the holes “Friends” left on Thursday nights when it finished (a couple seasons after it should have, to be fair) in 2004. The network has found some gems in “The Office,” “30 Rock,” “Community” and “Parks and Recreation.” But there’s always that other spot to fill, the one that seems cursed by the many multi-camera comedies that once ruled the night for NBC, from “Seinfeld” to “Frasier” to “Will & Grace.” Recent inductees into the network’s comedy graveyard include “Perfect Couples” and “Outsourced,” as well as others I’ve thankfully forgotten. Hopefully, “Whitney,” a bland, unfunny, wannabe “Friends,” joins them. Soon.

Whitney Cummings has been touted as this fall’s “It” girl, producing both her star turn in “Whitney” and “2 Broke Girls” on CBS, but the fact that her biggest previous credit is appearing regularly on “Chelsea Lately” on E! should have been a red flag. Both of her new shows feature tired plots and bad writing, with “Girls” relying on sexual references and jokes that would be at home on “Two and a Half Men.” At least Kat Dennings does her best to save the show, which despite its many flaws still has potential. But “Whitney” falls flat in all aspects, most notably with its cast of stock characters. We’ve got the bitter single friend, Roxanne (Rhea Seehorn), who drinks too early in the day and never smiles; the horny and single male friend, Mark (Dan O’Brien), who tortures viewers with his sex jokes and sees women as prizes; the hyper-sexed and overly affectionate couple, Neal and Lily (Maulik Pancholy and Zoe Lister-Jones); and Whitney’s bitter mother (Jane Kaczmarek), who still rails about Whitney’s father even though both she and he have been married multiple times since their relationship failed.

And then we have Whitney and her boyfriend, Alex (Chris D’Elia). They’re three years into their relationship, content living together without getting married. Whether they are happy, though, is hard to tell. Whitney is too busy being “eccentric” and lacking facial expressions, and Alex is too busy making half-hearted commentary about her eccentricities to notice that his girlfriend doesn’t smile. He’s the straight man here, although Whitney lacks the spark and humor necessary to pull off the slightly-neurotic, says-the-wrong-things-but-still-is-adorable persona she must be aiming for. (Zooey Deschanel, on Fox’s “New Girl,” handles this role well. And her face moves.) Conversely, Whitney plays the straight man for her crazy friends, none of whom seem nice. Who would want to hang around in this crowd? I’d be bitter and drunk at 2:30 p.m., too. Perhaps that is how they got the live studio audience to play along, although I could have sworn it was a laugh track. Alcohol may make the show more tolerable.

The beginning of the pilot has the friends attending a wedding, a theme likely to recur here as Whitney and Alex are confronted with the issue of not marrying, a fresh, bold topic in 2011. After hearing how many times Neal and Lily have sex a week, however, Whitney is worried that she and Alex are growing apart. She picks up a sexy nurse outfit for a bit of role play, and here, halfway through the episode, is the only bit that brings a few chuckles. But as an excited Alex races to the bedroom to follow Whitney — after she makes him present his insurance card and fill out forms — he trips, hits his head on the counter and ends up in the hospital with a concussion. The only funny segment is cut short. In fact, most of the segments, just as on “2 Broke Girls,” feel frantically patched together, with bad editing and awkward transitions. There’s not enough story here to present a story, just a bunch of scenes that don’t go anywhere. “Whitney” has no real theme, or an anchor bringing the characters together, such as an office or a school. This type of show can work — again, “Friends” — but the friends need to be likable, not shrill.

At the wedding, a girl who hit on Alex refers to Whitney as, essentially, “that loud girl.” This as Whitney grabs a few cupcakes to eat, not knowing she was supposed to wait for the bride and groom to get first dibs. Oh, Whitney! Alex can’t take you anywhere. If only you were actually charming — and looked like you actually ate cupcakes — we’d smile and shake our heads right along with your boyfriend. But he’s acting. We have no reason to pretend you’re fun to be around.

“Whitney” airs at 9:30/8:30C on NBC. For now.

Sarah Carlson has a front-row seat to the decline of the newspaper industry and lives in Alabama with her overly excitable Pembroke Welsh corgi. She also loves cupcakes.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



"Revenge," It Turns Out, Is A Dish Best Served Hot. Like, Supremely Smoking Hot. | Is Your Friday Drab, Dull, Unglamorous? Let Emma Stone, Ryan Gosling And A Dog Fix That!









Comments

I don't like to judge someone's personality on their looks but whenever I see Whitney Cummings I think she looks...how do I put this nicely?

She's definitely no Marcellus Wallace.

Posted by: Paultera at September 23, 2011 1:17 PM

Many, many years ago, I saw an interview with John Cleese talking about how they put each episode of Fawlty Towers together. Before they event started writing, they built a really complex chart of the episode that plotted every scene, every move, how each scene would relate to the next, how often a character should re-appear, and how each thread they had started would tie up or contribute to the ending of each episode. Then and only then would they start writing dialogue. And even if they thought of a really good joke, it didn't make it in if it didn't work within the framework they put together.

Most shows these days seem to start with "hey, here are a few good lines" and then they build a filler show around them.

Posted by: PaddyDog at September 23, 2011 1:19 PM

I hate to be one of "those people" who judges something without having seen it, but. . . I will here. Just based on the 15 second commercials for this show, I despise this Whitney person. She seems obnoxious, freakishly unattractive, and terribly unfunny. The unattractive part really shouldn't matter, because I'm tired of every show casting some model-turned-actor in every role to fill the screen with perfect-looking 20-somethings. However, there's something about her that makes me physically turn away. I can't watch her, and I can't explain it. It's not like she's really ugly or anything, but she just looks so weird.

Posted by: Hoof Hearted at September 23, 2011 1:23 PM

I watched 15 seconds of this last night. Right up until the 2nd canned laugh kicked in. I can't remember the last time I watched something with a laugh track. Turned to the husband, wild eyed, and said, "Uh, can't, no, turning, bye."

I actually sat through an episode of Jerseylicious while waiting on Sunny to begin at 10:00 just to get away from the laugh track.

Posted by: Jill at September 23, 2011 1:49 PM

I read on her IMDB page that she was born in 1982.
I don't think so.

Posted by: daria at September 23, 2011 1:49 PM

Whitney looked so uncomfortable in front of the cameras. It bugged me that she said a lot of her dialogue while looking at the floor, not at whomever she was speaking to. I realize she's a stand-up comedian, not an actress, but you think someone would have directed her not to do that.

Can't say I'll mourn this one.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at September 23, 2011 1:50 PM

Do they ever explain why Alex is with her? In the first half of the episode I learned that she's awful, they don't get along, and he doesn't seem to have trouble attracting women.
Why is he dating her?

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at September 23, 2011 1:54 PM

Hoof Hearted: The show is freaking horrible. You did yourself a favor by skipping it.

Posted by: TylerDFC at September 23, 2011 2:22 PM

I watched it, but I was about 2/3 of the way through a bottle of wine, so I didn't notice much. Except for the jacket her deep-voiced blonde chick friend was wearing in one scene. The trenchy-coat thing with the piping? I must find that jacket and possess it.

Posted by: Captain Tuttle at September 23, 2011 2:28 PM

Most shows these days seem to start with "hey, here are a few good lines" and then they build a filler show around them.

Posted by: PaddyDog at September 23, 2011 1:19 PM
---
It's worse than that. Most shows seem to start with "Hey, here's a cliche phrase nobody's used yet, let's make it a title and then come up with a show!"

Posted by: , at September 23, 2011 2:31 PM

Most shows these days seem to start with "hey, here are a few good lines" and then they build a filler show around them.

Posted by: PaddyDog at September 23, 2011 1:19 PM
---
It's worse than that. Most shows seem to start with "Hey, here's a cliche phrase nobody's used yet, let's make it a title and then come up with a show!"

Posted by: , at September 23, 2011 2:32 PM

The real travesty here is that Whitney the human being is AWESOME. Caught her on Howard this week and she is smart, funny, quick, honest, cool. I would TOTALLY hang out with Whitney in real life. Whitney on the show gave me douche chills.

I hope that this show blows because of all the network suits giving "notes" and such. It won't be easy for her to recover from such a public failure as these two shows will shortly be.

But I think she could rock something on cable a la Louie.

Posted by: Alexis at September 23, 2011 2:33 PM

Why is he dating her?

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at September 23, 2011 1:54 PM
---
Because if he married her, he'd have to kill her.

(Also, 'pologies for the double post.)

Posted by: , at September 23, 2011 2:33 PM

I think she's attractive, but not in an overwhelming traditional sense. I've watched all the comedy shows she's got on Netflix. She's cute, and funny, but she seems to regurgitate the same jokes over and over again.

My problem is her voice. It gets on my nerves...so fucking bad. I wanted to watch the show, but I couldn't. Because I remember that goddamn voice.

@daria, I don't know why you don't think she was born in 1982. I was born in 1982. She looks, and acts, like a lot of the women I know my age.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at September 23, 2011 2:49 PM

This is probably just me, but the boyfriend looks like a very strange mix of Martin Starr and Hugh Jackman.

Posted by: Socrates_Johnson at September 23, 2011 3:36 PM

I've seen Whitney Cummings do stand-up and she CAN be funny. It's in more of a raunchy, good-time-girl sort of way too. Her show though is horrible. She looked utterly uncomfortable and nothing about it felt funny or put together.

Posted by: Sassafrass Green at September 23, 2011 3:41 PM

I have seen her standup and her pictures and she just looks botoxed to hell. I don't understand why someone that age would do all that crap to her face. She has had a lot of obvious plastic surgery. If she is that age, the work definitely makes her look older.

Posted by: daria at September 23, 2011 4:04 PM

She can't be that age. I was born in 82, and so were a lot of my friends and peers here in LA who have done more drinking and drugs than me. Whitney Cummings CANNOT be 29. I saw her at the Improv a few years ago, and she was semi-funny, but even then I was pegging her at 32 or 33.

Back on topic - I know a guy who's friends with Chris D'Elia, and he seems cool and funny, so when I saw the feature-length commercial for Whitney in the theaters, I was hoping it would be funny. 23 seconds into it, I was like "Make it stop! It buuurrrrnnnnsss!!!" And that laugh track was painful. Makes me glad I don't have a TV.

Posted by: Rest In Peace at September 23, 2011 4:15 PM

Why not build a show around Jane Kaczmarek, instead of putting her in the background?

Posted by: grumpiestoldman at September 23, 2011 4:18 PM

There's already a "Friends" replacement, it's called "Happy Endings" and it's on ABC and it's pretty damn good.

Posted by: Slash at September 23, 2011 4:26 PM

Friends? Gross.

Posted by: seth at September 23, 2011 4:48 PM

Happy Endings is a great Friends replacement, but the best one is Cougar Town. You even get an orinal "Friend" in the mix.
Also, I was drunk and it did nothing to make Whitney even remotely tolerable.

Posted by: Penny Kann at September 23, 2011 5:26 PM

I'm going to say it. Outsourced was better than this. Maybe it's like comparing apples to rotten apples, but it was more watchable.

Poor NBC. I really root for them but....yeah I don't need to finish that sentence.

Posted by: Sadie at September 23, 2011 6:30 PM

Once the show started...my Wife and I immediately couldn't believe the overzealous "CANNED LAUGHTER."
Then, in the credits, it states, "FILMED BEFORE A LIVE STUDIO AUDIENCE"...We both simultaneously did a MAKE ROOM FOR DADDY spit-take...and completely lost the rest of the alcohol we would have needed to enjoy the rest of this 3 episode series...

@Seth...No shit!

Posted by: Strandlund at September 23, 2011 6:56 PM

I rather watch back-to-back marathons of this crapfest and Chelsea Lately than that shit pile Zooey Hipstertwat is discharging over at FOX.

Seriously, you folks need to get over that woman.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at September 23, 2011 8:47 PM

Whitney herself is a funny woman trying really hard to fit the shock comic mold of a Joan Rivers. The problem is that she's best when she's being natural and riffing on whatever comes to her mind. Her stand-up is pretty consistently bad; her live TV panel appearances are generally funny. She's great on Chelsea Lately and gets called on her bullshit act whenever she starts trying the "I'm a ho" jokes on TV. She holds her own on those awful Comedy Central roasts, too.

Posted by: Robert at September 23, 2011 10:56 PM

Without hyperbolie, Whitney Cummings makes Dan "Larry the Cable Guy" Whitney look like the greatest comedian of the century. I'd say Whitney's a female Dane Cook, but Cook is someone people actually pay money to see.

Posted by: Devil Child at September 24, 2011 2:08 AM

Her body language tells me that she's really excited about how skinny she is.

Posted by: Melissa at September 24, 2011 3:12 AM

Whitney was unbearable. I only tuned in, because I read somewhere that it was going to be bad on purpose or turn something on its head, but it didn't. It was just terrible.

Posted by: John G. at September 24, 2011 3:59 AM

The unattractive part really shouldn't matter, because I'm tired of every show casting some model-turned-actor in every role to fill the screen with perfect-looking 20-somethings.

Hah, Hoof Hearted, she actually WAS a model. It was in middle and high school, so I don't know if that counts, but still.

The boyfriend looks like the offspring of Gaius Baltar and someone else who looks a lot like the actor who plays Gaius Baltar.

Posted by: SaBrina at September 24, 2011 11:12 AM

I agree with BarbadoSlim - what is with the Pajiba nation's infatuation with Zooey D? Whitney's show is crap but I actually laughed once or twice. I think I could have a cup of coffee with her character. I couldn't stand to be in the same room as Zooey's zany, "adorkable" character. Nails on a chalkboard that one!

Posted by: BitterKitten at September 25, 2011 1:22 AM

After being bombarded in LA with a wave of outdoor marketing for this show, I felt as if I already read all the insipid and lackluster jokes it had to offer. Still, I tuned in out of morbid curiosity. Dear Lord in heaven, make it STOP! This show is tired and flat with highly unlikable characters. Lots of folks are commenting that Whitney looks much older than someone born in 1982. She must have sold her soul to The Dark Prince to get her show on the air but unfortunately forgot to include maintaining youthful good looks.

Posted by: Andrewsaysso at October 14, 2011 1:11 AM

Whitney is the worst show I've ever seen on TV. I gave it a big chance because I am a Howard Stern fan and she was on a few times. The promo where she says "I love you" in that horrid tone is the worst. She is all about crappy cheap and not funny sex jokes. Yawn. She has no character, is ugly and way too thin and ugly is fine if it has any redeeming character or quirk but she is just trying to be thin girl pretty and she's horrid botox plain and not funny. Even on Howard's show she was not funny. She tried to use sex appeal and sex jokes but she is not sexy and not funny. Her face and personality are corpse like: dead, none.
Please make her go away. Her unfunny and ugly signs all over LA
are the worst and the show is the worst thing I've ever seen on TV. I wanted to like it because she was on Howard but really, calling it garbage is a compliment. Bad sex jokes are just an embarassment. I hate this show enough to write a comment which I never do. GO AWAY WHITNEY.
You are BORING and awful. Make it all go away. Hurry.

Posted by: lisa davis at November 4, 2011 7:55 AM