free counter with statistics Southland Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

425.southland.030409.jpg
From the Top of the Mountain, There's Only a Valley and Whatever Lies Between


"Southland" / Sarah Carlson

TV Reviews | April 16, 2009 | Comments (18)


Last winter and into the spring, I spent hours watching the entire series of “The Wire” on DVD, catching up to watch its final fifth season live. Since then, in almost everything I’ve written for this site, I’ve praised the HBO series about Baltimore cops and the “criminals” they chase, usually in the same breath with slamming other television or film works for not even touching the bar “The Wire” set. It’s just the best show in the history of television, and one of the best works of art I’ve ever seen. Period. And this is what kills me, and makes me curse the show’s creator, David Simon. By showing me how good TV can get, I’m ruined on anything that settles for less, especially dramas. “The Wire” changed the way I think about society and government and education and all of their collective problems, which makes it all the harder for me to tune in to brainless procedurals my grandparents enjoy just for some mild brain stimulation at the end of the day. Simon summed it up best himself in his pitch for the show in 2001 to Carolyn Strauss, then of HBO:

It is a significant victory for HBO to counter program alternative, inaccessible worlds against standard network fare. But it would, I will argue, be a more profound victory for HBO to take the essence of network fare and smartly turn it on its head, so that no one who sees HBO’s take on the culture of crime and crime fighting can watch anything like “C.S.I.” or “N.Y.P.D. Blue” or “Law & Order” again without knowing that every punch was pulled on those shows. For HBO to step toe-to-toe with NBC or ABC and create a cop show that seizes the highest qualitative ground through realism, good writing, and a more brutal assessment of police, police work, and the drug culture — this may not be the beginning of the end for network dramas as the industry standard, but it is certainly the end of the beginning for HBO.

It’s almost unfair that cop shows have to compete with “The Wire,” just as it’s unfair I began a review of one of the latest said shows by detailing why it can never be great because greatness has already been accomplished. But it’s the best way I can make it clear that I’m almost at a loss to talk about “Southland,” NBC’s drama about the LAPD. It’s good, fairly engaging, interesting. It’s “Wire” Light, which is OK. Not a bad way to spend 44 minutes, and certainly a better option for the masses than most of what’s on primetime. But, being on network television and having an executive producer of John Wells, the man who gave us too many years of “E.R.” and who gutted the heart and soul of “The West Wing” once Aaron Sorkin left, viewers can expect a lot of darkness in the set design, not in the actual story.

Following various beat cops and detectives in South Los Angeles, the key character is Officer Ben Sherman (Ben McKenzie), whom we meet on his first day on the job, riding around town with the fairly annoying Officer John Cooper (Michael Cudlitz). McKenzie plays the wide-eyed rookie well, but blends in reserve and sensitivity and intelligence to make the character easily likable. His fellow officers are a tad unnerved, though, especially when Cooper finds out that Ben comes from wealth, and this is where the plot is eerily similar to ABC’s new cop show, “The Unusuals.” In that, Amber Tamblyn’s character comes from money but decided to be a cop out of principle or something. But she wants her background to stay there, and apparently Ben does, too. But both characters are outed to the viewers by people from their pasts who can’t believe they’re wearing badges. What they are out to prove isn’t clear, but at least in “Southland’s” pilot we get the sense that Ben has separated himself from his family ties and likely whatever career path he was designed for. Cooper is rude to him, though, and tells him he has “90210 written all over him.” OK. Another cop — the requisite loudmouth and hothead who gets his ass shot for sucking at his job as well at life — refers to Ben as “Generation Y” as he’s yelling at him to get out of his way and obey his orders. Really? These are insults? No case was made for the viewer to feel either way about Ben’s apparent fish-out-of-water experience, but the writing and fake conflict are so two-dimensional that we end up not at all blaming the intelligent Ben for questioning the choice of working with these guys. I thought this was supposed to make us like cops?

Other characters that are followed are Det. Lydia Adams (Regina King) and Det. Russell Clark (Tom Everett Scott), and a few others. King is busy furrowing her brow and looking concerned while Scott stands in the background and does nothing. I’ll give the writers this, though: For a primetime show, they were willing to let two young kids be hurt, one gunned down and the other abducted and killed, as well as show a partly decomposed body that had been lunch for rabid dogs. That subject matter was more believable than the actual banter between the cops, if not truly dark, but it may be the show’s saving grace. The hitch comes in that “Southland’s” pilot has some Crash-like qualities to it in that the cases being followed and the cops working them are all slightly connected, even if it’s just Ben and Cooper driving past the young girl right before she is kidnapped and before Adams and Russell are brought to the scene. L.A. is kinda big, and the sooner writers stop trying to connect all of its residents’ lives — and never follow Paul Haggis’ lead on anything — the better we’ll all be.

For its shortcomings, “Southland’s” strength will undoubtedly be the talented McKenzie, whom I’ve liked since “The O.C.,” which I truthfully followed all the way through its four seasons. But it was in that least-watched fourth season that some surprisingly funny and touching moments came and where McKenzie sharpened his timing skills and proved he could do more than brood and skulk and brood some more. That season also came after his impressive turn in Junebug,” and hopefully he’ll continue to be in more projects. That his presence is a main reason to tune in continues a trend this spring season in TV, such as with Jeremy Renner on “The Unusuals” and Nathan Fillion on “Castle” stealing their respective shows. The shows aren’t great, but with great actors taking what they can get, we’ll have to do the same as well. Which brings us full circle. “Southland” can only represent reality as it’s deemed acceptable by broadcast networks and advertisers. It’s grittier than, say, “Law & Order,” and will be worth keeping up with for now, but we’ll watch it mainly because it’s on, and it’s one of the better cop shows airing and, well, why not? We hit the peak; now there’s nowhere to go but down.

Sarah Carlson has a front-row seat to the decline of the newspaper industry and lives in Alabama with her overly excitable Welsh Corgi.


"State of Play" Review (the BBC Series) | Indiscreet Review



Comments

Good review. I liked the show well enough. I haven't seen The Wire yet, so I haven't been tainted and can enjoy these relatively easily.

Posted by: Snath at April 16, 2009 3:19 PM

I will probably be skinned alive for this, but I didn't enjoy The Wire. I gave it a shot...but couldn't get into it. I am in a serious minority, I know.
I will probably give this show a shot, though, especially now that I know my secret boyfriend Ben McKenzie is in it. Yum.
I watched the OC until it started taking all kinds of implausible wrong turns (after season one, to be honest) and focused less on Ben's character. I'm excited to see him doing another show.

Posted by: Whorish Mouth at April 16, 2009 3:23 PM

I haven't even watched The Wire, but was really bored by the pilot--except of course when Benjamin McKenzie was onscreen.

Posted by: kelsy at April 16, 2009 3:40 PM

Sarah, I had the exact same thing happen to me! I LOVED Damages last season and was so, so excited for it to come back in its second season. And then I made the mistake of watching The Wire, which means that nothing else can even compare. Regardless of the actual quality of Damages S2, I just couldn't enjoy it when I thought about how much better The Wire was in every regard. And yeah, Damages is still a great show... but nothing can compare. And that's why The Wire kind of ruined drama for me. I'm glad someone else is having the same problem.

Thank goodness The Duel is back so I can enjoy something without the comparison! David Simon: stay away from MTV has-beens.

Posted by: J at April 16, 2009 3:57 PM

So note to self: DO NOT add The Wire to Netflix until all other shows have been exhausted?

Posted by: Stella at April 16, 2009 4:26 PM

Usually, promos make me at least a little curious to check a show out - not "Southland" (question: do people in L.A. call it that?). In fact, every time I saw the promos for it, with that one guy doing those "intense cop speeches" that network TV shows think makes up for realistic dialogue, it made me want to see it less. Rookie cop in the big city? Don't care don't care don't care, really don't care...

The Unusuals is growing on me. It's not great, but it's better than Life on Mars was. And I watched Life on Mars, simply because there wasn't anything better on at the time (usually).

Posted by: Slash at April 16, 2009 5:04 PM

I've watched The Wire all the way through, and although it sets the bar impossibly high, I don't understand how other shows get cast off due to their not being "as good as The Wire."

I enjoyed The Wire immensely for what it is, namely a realistic crime drama that follows a group of police officers over several years. However, it fills a different space in my viewing needs than the popcorn procedural crap I still routinely tune in for. I don't watch NCIS to get a realistic understanding of what goes on in the actual Naval Criminal Invesitgation Service but rather to watch Mark Harmon growl at people, listen to Michael Weatherly crack some jokes and hope that they put Cote de Pablo into something form fitting. Its not highbrow entertainment at all, but I enjoy the time I spend with the show and it allows me to shut my brain off and be entertained when that's what I'm looking for.

Just as I don't go to the store and buy a cube steak hoping it tastes like filet, neither do I sit down in front of NCIS, CSI or Law and Order hoping to probe the deeper depths of the human condition.

I feel like our expectations should be tempered by what is actually being offered us, not what we expect or want them to provide. You won't find television like The Wire on a major network, nor will you find mindless brain candy like CSI on HBO, so is comparing the two really fair?

Posted by: Roaddog at April 16, 2009 5:18 PM

But it would, I will argue, be a more profound victory for HBO to take the essence of network fare and smartly turn it on its head, so that no one who sees HBO’s take on the culture of crime and crime fighting can watch anything like “C.S.I.” or “N.Y.P.D. Blue” or “Law & Order” again without knowing that every punch was pulled on those shows.

Although I've read some of the articles Simon wrote and interviews he gave about "The Wire," I had no idea he said something so prescient. I was once a loyal fan of shows like "NYPD Blue," but after watching "The Wire," there's no way I can watch any of the current procedurals and detective shows like "CSI" or "Life." Even the roughest of them is just too twee and candy-colored in how the police interact with each other and with their environment, and I sit there rolling my eyes every time someone makes a cutesie comment or tries to talk "street." Guh.

"Dexter" and "Breaking Bad" are so far away from this genre that I guess I approach them differently. "Dexter" is more of a fable, and I don't expect the slightest bit of reality from the PD (nor do I get the slightest bit). "Breaking Bad" isn't about cops, though it may be a decent, if absurdist, take on the drug gangs. At least they're portrayed as unrelentingly nasty and cunning, if frequently stupid, which I think is pretty much right.

I've stopped giving shows a chance when they're "just okay" out of the gate. You just can't open up with your "B" game -- if you've got an "A" game, you better bring it early to prove you belong. I don't have the energy or the heart to spend time hoping against hope that they'll turn into something decent, and this one seems like a poster child for that breed.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at April 16, 2009 5:36 PM

I feel like our expectations should be tempered by what is actually being offered us, not what we expect or want them to provide.

If there's no alternative available, then I think that's right. To use your example, if I can't find or can't afford tenderloin, I'll go with cube steak rather than do without.

On the other hand, I used to like Budweiser, back in the misty eons of my youth; it was all I knew. Once I'd had a Guinness, I realized I'd been drinking water with tin shavings and aftershave splashed in it. There was little chance I would ever go back to a regular diet of Bud. I drink one now and then when it's all that's available, but I can't drink a Bud without thinking how much happier I'd be if it were a Stella, and I think that's the metaphor Sarah is spinning. You may tolerate the Bud if you have to, but once you've had Guinness or Stella, you'll never get over how much less worthwhile the Budweiser is.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at April 16, 2009 5:41 PM

You may tolerate the Bud if you have to, but once you've had Guinness or Stella, you'll never get over how much less worthwhile the Budweiser is.

I understand your point, and it may very well be that I'm simply not built like the rest of the television viewing public. I guess my argument revolves around the fact that I don't always want to watch the top notch stuff like The Sopranos or The Wire because it IS so good it requires me to engage on a level deeper than simply casual viewing. I view something critically and I expect it to be good. I view something casually and I want it to keep me busy for a few hours.

I suppose knowing how good television CAN be as compared to what we all watch is a sad and sobering thought for some. For my money though, there are just some days where I wanna kick my shoes off, slam some PBR and watch a dumb cop and his hot partner solve some shit in the simplest way possible.

Posted by: Roaddog at April 16, 2009 6:10 PM

Off topic: FUCK you guys and your fucking embedded ads with sound included. The last thing I want to hear when I come here is about "Coke's secret formula." You really can't pay the bills without using the most annoying form of ad service? Fuck sakes...

Posted by: Roaddog at April 16, 2009 6:18 PM

I saw a preview for this thing in a showing of Frost/Nixon, and I gotta say, the only thing that it made me do was laugh. Ma and I both made fun of it the entire time, and picked on it for months after.

My uncle is an actual officer up in Chicago, and knowing what really happens in the world of crimefighting kind of renders absurd even the best of cop shows. I'm making an exception for comedic shows, but that's all. Hopefully, The Wire is so good that I'll ignore all that if I ever get around to seeing it.

Posted by: George at April 16, 2009 7:07 PM

I'm with you on that one Roaddog.

I hate having to mute my speakers before clicking the "pajiba-bitches" bookmark.

Posted by: adam at April 16, 2009 8:28 PM

I equate people who love TV and have not seen The Wire to people who love movies and have not seen The Godfather movies. I note that your love is imcomplete and go about my day feeling sorry for you.
I says to myself, "What a miserable bastard." Then I drink a Monster.

Posted by: Kballs at April 17, 2009 9:43 AM

@ Slash: People in L.A. do NOT call it the "Southland." It's so weird--the only people who call it that are our local news reporters. I've never heard anyone actually use the term in regular conversation. Why do our news reporters say it? It's a mystery I've pondered for a while.

I got The Wire from Netflix, but I found the first episode to be so boring that I couldn't muster the enthusiasm to watch another one. At which episode does it start getting interesting? I'd be willing to give it another shot.

Posted by: Leota1313 at April 17, 2009 2:54 PM

WhorishMouth... not that I have to point this out (most intelligent people have probably already had this thought, resulting in complete disregard of your comment) but in the same breath you stated that "The Wire" wasn't special and that Southland is. You gave no real reason for your opinion of "The Wire". In the same post you actually suggest that Southland is great because you have a baby crush on the main character. I'm so happy the internet exists so that people like you can be exposed and, perhaps, change.

Posted by: najneb at April 19, 2009 10:03 AM

This show's from wells too?
ok
so
why is it different from Third Watch?
A: Because it's only about cops
oook.

Posted by: marlom at April 19, 2009 8:59 PM

I watched the first episode of Southland and throughly enjoyed it. Granted, I haven't seen The Wire (no HBO in my home) but in an age of mindless reality TV, I'm grateful for a scripted drama. I think Regina King is a standout and does alot more than just "furrowing her brow and looking concerned," but then I'm not the type of person who watches a show with the main purpose of comparing it to other TV shows. I think Southland shows promise and I'd like to see it develop further.

Posted by: She at May 10, 2009 12:40 PM