web
counter
 

Looking Fondly Back On a Decade of Potter

By Sarah Carlson | Posted Under Think Pieces | Comments (35)



IMG_0366.JPG

You may find it ridiculous, but it’s not hyperbolic to say that Friday’s release of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 marks the end of an era. Because for 14 years — 14! — pop culture has been influenced by J.K. Rowling’s The Boy Who Lived. There have only been two years (2006 and 2008) since Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone’s 1997 release in the U.K. that didn’t see a new book or a movie in the mega-franchise. For 14 years, fans have had a new installment to wait for in this entertainment juggernaut that has grossed billions worldwide. And while the continuous cranking out of eight films to keep pace with the seven books has been impressive — and as with the books, the Warner Bros. Pictures films have been increasingly better in style content — it’s the years the series has spanned that matter when you try to understand fans. I’ve spent a decade with Harry Potter, from age 17 to 27, attending every movie on opening night as well as release parties for several of the books. A fan who began the books at age 11, Harry’s age in Philosopher’s/Sorcerer’s Stone and actor Daniel Radcliffe’s age when he first donned the round-rimmed glasses to play him, is now 21. They came of age with Harry — and stars Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson. The hysteria surrounding the series and the many devoted fans’ mixed emotions at seeing it end makes perfect sense. Deathly Hallows: Part 2 is the last entry, the last midnight release, the last thing to count down to. At this point, Harry Potter isn’t just a part of our life experiences; it’s a part of who we are.

A former editor of mine didn’t want to hear this babble four years ago when Deathly Hallows was released. He wanted a column about my devouring the 759-page tome — as well as details on my dressing as Harry himself for the release party at the local Books-A-Million. (The above photo is me holding my copy in the store parking lot that night, not long after I’d run to the car, screaming and covering my ears with my hands to avoid spoilers shouted by punks I was certain would do just that.) The editor wanted some explanation for my devotion, but as I told my ideas for the column before that July 21, 2007 night, he seemed uninterested. Perhaps my anecdotes were too personal for his taste, but if I analyze the time in my life when I first encountered Harry — November 2001, when the movie Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone was released — I see my connection to the boy wizard may have begun as something entirely personal.

That film premiered exactly a year after the death of my best friend at 16 in a car accident. High school was a nuisance, something I needed to overcome before college, and the Harry Potter books, of which four had been released, proved a helpful escape. Here was a hero, both a celebrity and an underdog, who was special for his bravery and who was protected by what he would eventually and begrudgingly learn was what matters most in life: love. Additionally, coming just a month after Sept. 11, 2001, the ever-increasing dangers of the wizarding world made sense in comparison to our own. Here was an author refusing to present characters in terms of black and white and routinely driving home the point that confronting evil requires more complexity than seeing it simply as a specific entity to be vanquished. It’s about power. As Professor Albus Dumbledore told Harry at the end of book two, The Chamber of Secrets, “It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities.” In an increasingly chaotic and insane world, I turned to Rowling and her tales. There amidst the magic, I found reason. Amidst the political wars of our home, the only group I wanted to belong to was Dumbledore’s Army.

Other fans have similar stories. A 25-year-old I interviewed last week about Deathly Hallows: Part 2 described how she read and reread the Harry Potter books as she was diagnosed with and treated for a brain tumor at 16. It was cathartic, she said. A young woman’s sign at the New York City premiere of Part 2 on Monday said Harry Potter helped her beat an eating disorder. Of course, other fans have no such personal ties, and that’s OK. Many just enjoyed the books and/or movies and wouldn’t dream of wearing a robe and carrying a wand to a movie theater. That’s OK, too, though let’s face it, not as fun. With more than 450 million copies of the books sold worldwide, you’re going to have a variety of readers. But the key is that Harry Potter got so many people of all ages, including myself, engaged in reading. We all saw the books as a form of escapism; we just had different things to escape from. That sense of wonder we felt gave us a chance to have fun and act like kids, now matter our age.

As I attend Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 on Thursday night, having squeezed into a Quidditch T-shirt I purchased as a teenager, I’ll remind myself that even as it’s my last midnight release for the series, the books and DVDs are still on my shelves. They, like any good piece of art, can transport me to Harry’s world at any time. The magic has changed but isn’t gone. Because however fans came to Harry, we’re still his.

Sarah Carlson has a front-row seat to the decline of the newspaper industry and lives in Alabama with her overly excitable Pembroke Welsh Corgi.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint Career Assessment: One Of Three Ain't Bad | Kiss Him With Tongue! 16 Movies We Wish Were A Little Gayer









Comments

This was lovely. It's a very weird week for me. In addition to the Harry Potter chapter of my life ending Friday, I'm leaving my job of the past two years, and putting up a show that I've been working on the past two months. That's a whole lot going on. It's really hard to know that there will be no new Potter anymore, but I agree with your assessment that we will always have the books and movies to help us escape to his world whenever we want. And I look forward to one day sharing that with my kids.

Posted by: KatSings at July 13, 2011 3:15 PM

Friday a group of us are watching the 7th movie, and I've got my ticket for Saturday. Really looking forward to Rickman's performance - I hope they don't short-change Snape's story.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at July 13, 2011 3:31 PM

As someone who had the first book read to me by a teacher in elementary school, when I was just a year older than Harry, I feel our generation is connected to this series in a way that few generations, if any, can say they are connected to a pop culture phenomenon of any kind. Harry Potter didn't just excite readers of my generation; it helped us understand how we felt and thought, how we move through the world, how we define what is moral and true, because as the books and characters grew, so did we. It's not hyperbolic at all; there are millions of people who, without Harry Potter, would be completely different adults than they will be because they grew up with these books.

A great write-up, and truly deeply felt.

Posted by: ChristianH at July 13, 2011 3:44 PM

Thanks for the meditation on (for me) the last 14 years. I read the first books to my daughter when she was 4; now she's going off to college. So the ending of the series is (for me) blended with the ending of my daughter's time at home. Crap, now I'm tearing up. But thanks for a sweet and honest reflection.

Posted by: John at July 13, 2011 4:00 PM

I've told you the story before, of how I got my little nephew to start reading by giving him the first Harry Potter, and then the 2nd, and 3rd, and then the 4th came out that same summer. He asked for the 5th and I told him she hadn't written it yet, but I'd get it for him as soon as it was released in a couple of years. The look on his face! That will never happen again, because kids today can buy them all and read them one after another without having to wait. The anticipation made it even better.

Posted by: BWeaves at July 13, 2011 4:01 PM

I was already out of college when the first book came out, but I fell in love right away and read them voraciously as they came out (though a little sheepishly at times, since I was a grown woman). I now have all the books, all the DVDs currently out, and all the audiobooks (fun to listen to while walking or cleaning house). I also have various supplemental books like Quidditch Through the Ages, not to mention the Wii game of Lego Harry Potter and a Lego Harry Potter game on my iPad, so I'm a bit of a Potter geek for an older broad. I've really been enjoying getting my kids into it. My oldest son (almost 9) has finished the first 6 books and is in the middle of #7. I'm a little sad sometimes that I wasn't younger when these books came out, and like BWeaves said, my kids won't have the anticipation factor but can just read them one after another, but it's still a magical place for us to go when we read together.

Posted by: pickled tink at July 13, 2011 4:22 PM

The WSJ had an article about how Harry Potter saved reading. I'm not sure about that, but my own kids devoured those books and many, many others as they became avid readers. It certainly helped.

Posted by: James S at July 13, 2011 4:53 PM

I, like so many others, pretty much grew up with Harry. And as I am a July baby and that was when the books/movies tended to be released, it was like another little present for me every year. I was a little sad this year because aside from the first time I saw the trailer, I haven't felt much about the release of Deathly Hallows P2. I think that just changed.

It really is the end of an era. And now I don't get to look forward to my extra prezzie anymore. :)

Posted by: elleyezee at July 13, 2011 4:58 PM

I'm going with my BFF. Ever since Chamber of Secrets we've gone to midnight premieres together - this is not only our last HP premiere, but probably our last midnight movie ever, as she's 7 months pregnant. There . . . might be crying.

Posted by: Lauren at July 13, 2011 5:23 PM

I graduated from college a year ago and started a job with Americorps. This movie comes out this weekend, and my job ends next weekend. It's like childhood is ending.

Great write up.

Posted by: Will at July 13, 2011 5:31 PM

Excellent article, Sarah. I was already in college when the first movie came out, so I envy those who grew up on the books and movies. Reading them as an adult was still wonderful, but I can't imagine how much more so it would have been if I'd been a kid. Should I ever decide to have kids, I will absolutely look forward to sharing the series with them.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at July 13, 2011 6:29 PM

Sarah, like you, my first foray into Hogwarts was after a death. My grandmother died the day Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets premiered in theaters. It was the first death of someone I loved that I ever experienced, even though I was in college. That day was both one of the worst and one of the best days of my life, as I wasn't going to leave town for the funeral until the following afternoon, my friends insisted that I go with them to the movie. I didn't want to, but I didn't want to be alone and I definitely didn't want to be with my parents, yet, as I knew I had to be stronger than my father when I eventually saw him. So, we watched the first movie in the evening, and while I knew it wasn't perfect, it was a happy film, and that was sorely needed. We saw the second at the midnight showing, and I enjoyed it even more than the first. The next day, at the airport, I bought the first three books and spent any alone time I had before, after, and during my grandmother's funeral just devouring them.

I'll probably never have a completely unbiased view of the series, but it truly is amazing how carthartic Rowling's books can be. The way I had to discover them was painful, but they helped, and they still help. I wonder if it's because they deal so pointedly with death that they help actual mourning? Regardless, I can't wait to see the last movie, as it will almost feel like closure. Finally.

Posted by: RobP at July 13, 2011 6:57 PM

I always bought three copies - one for me, one for my sister's kids, and one for my Dad. Dad and I would talk on the phone until FedEx showed up with both boxes, then we'd sign off after cracking open the cover. I'm so glad he lived long enough to finish all seven books.

Posted by: funtime42 at July 13, 2011 7:45 PM

Great write-up, thank you. I have been taking my sister-in-law (there's sixteen years between her and my husband) to these movies since they began and it's our "thing". We've managed to see them, just the two of us, despite my having four babies in eight years, her going off to university and various other obstacles. She has even turned down going with her friends to see them with me, bless her! So while I am sad to see the movies come to an end because they are entertaining, I think I am mostly sad because my connection to my sister may falter. We have laughed and cried together thanks to Harry.

Oh well, there's always those four children to introduce to my Pottermania!

Posted by: wildflower at July 13, 2011 7:51 PM

I too grew up with Harry Potter, and am very thankful for it. I find it fitting that the last movie comes out the same year I graduate high school. I don't think it's hit me yet that I'll be going to college in the fall, but I know when those credits roll it will finally smack me in the face.

Thank you for this think piece.

Posted by: Pat at July 13, 2011 8:11 PM

Excellent post. I'm one of the older Potter fans (28 when the first book came out...40 now) and I think we all feel the sense of the end of an era.

Posted by: Neal at July 13, 2011 9:00 PM

My 11-year-old told me just tonight, "When I grow up, I'm going to make my kids read Harry Potter. They're going to love it."

Posted by: mswas at July 13, 2011 9:38 PM

It is the end of an era for me as well. I discovered HP my junior yearof college (2002), and now, as I'm about to hear my baby's heartbeat for the first time on Friday, I know how much I've grown as a reader and as a person. I know Harry, Hermione, and Ron have something to do with that.

I can't wait to introduce my baby to the joy of books!

Posted by: cumdog at July 13, 2011 9:55 PM

I read the first book to my daughter when she was five. We both fell in love. After that, she could read well enough to read the books as they came out. Once the movies started coming out, it became a family tradition to go. We went to the midnight releases of the books and posed for pictures with fake Harry Potters and Hagrids. She devoured them as they came out. I did, too. All of her friends in school were insane about the books and movies. Her 7th birthday party had a HP theme and even though it was a simple partty at home, it's still her favorite birthday.

Now she's nearly 17 and has grown up with this story. She's feeling sentimental and weepy this week about the last movie.

She'll go off to college in two summers. I've already decided I'm getting her a box set of the books and the movies to take (so she has a second set of each and can leave one at home). Any time she's down or lonely or super stressed, she can lose herself in Harry's world like she did her whole life. She calls it her "happy place."

And now I'm the weepy one.

Posted by: Snuggiepants at July 13, 2011 10:36 PM

YES.

I've been an avid bookworm ever since I started learning to read in kindergarten. I've especially loved British fantasy - by the 3rd grade, I had read both Alice and Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass unabridged several times, and Kenneth Grahame's The Wind in the Willows unabridged several times. Yes. I'm better than you. Plus the entire Lord of the Rings series beginning with The Hobbit and the Narnia Chronicles.

I say all this because TO THIS DAY I experience pompous asses who want to question my intelligence and fantasy literary cred for having the audacity to enjoy the Harry Potter Series. I began reading the series when I was 16. I was 24 when the last book was released. What I adore about the Potter novels is not just that I find them just as entertaining, multi-layered, and enriching as all the other novels I just mentioned. What I adore most of all is how contemporary Potter is! I love how that even the background secondary and tertiary characters feel real, I love how that Rowling specifically included children and adults of color and different cultures in the books because it reflects my world. I love how the series progressed from "magic mystery kids" to "shit just got real". I came of age while Harry, Hermione, and Ron did.

As much as I love those older aforementioned novels (and do not question my love - I have Jabberwocky and The Mouse's Tail memorized), I could never see myself in them. Once a year, I read the entire Potter series including Beedle the Bard, and each time I can personally identify with the story. It's beautiful, it's fun, and all those pompous clowns can stick it up their asses.

Posted by: Rest In Peace at July 13, 2011 10:39 PM

Forgot to say...

...So since I never got into the films, the end of the era feeling came for me when I finished the last book three days after it was released. I relive all of that, however, when I re-read the entire series once a year. Not the same, but it still feels so good.

Posted by: Rest In Peace at July 13, 2011 10:46 PM

The stories in this very column are why the Harry Potter series (books and films) were special. I'm in my mid-fifties, but after my niece introduced me to the books, I was hooked, and like Rest In Peace, I don't care what anyone thinks about that.

Posted by: Uriah Creep at July 13, 2011 10:54 PM

Great piece. I started reading it at 11, so like everyone else, I too grew up with the series. I'm also very sentimental about the books just because of what they mean to me. Harry Potter came into my life when I was just a lonely little kid and gave me a place where I could fit in. It kept me sane and I'm so very thankful for that.

Posted by: Drea Manon at July 13, 2011 11:37 PM

I was 11 years old when the first book was published so I literally grew up with the Harry Potter characters. I remember getting each book and staying up all night reading them...through middle school...through high school...and I remember sobbing through the last book at 20 years old.

I couldn't tell you exactly what it is about those books but you just open the cover and you're sucked into that world. Like so many millions of other people I found such an escape through them, feeling every triumph and heartbreak the characters experienced and exploring that amazing wizard world as they did.

JK Rowling created something really special that affected a lot of people, and I feel she deserves every cent of the money she has for bringing so much magic into our sad muggle world. I'm almost afraid to see the last movie in theaters because I know I'll be an emotional wreck. It's going to be very hard to say goodbye to The Boy Who Lived.

Posted by: LaRhue at July 14, 2011 1:56 AM

I remember getting a call at work the night that the Deathly Hallows book came out. She wanted me to stop at Meijer and get a gallon of milk and the new Harry Potter novel.

I got to the store, the line went all the way to the back of the store and bent around, so I got the milk at the gas station, and bought the book the next day. No line, same book.

Posted by: Uncle JR at July 14, 2011 5:30 AM

14 when the first movie came out. Read the books later. Wow, 10 years? Where did my youth go?
The other night, the local cable run b2b2b series until Azkaban, my fave in the series. I hated Goblet back then, but this time around, the Yule ball and the syrupy Magic Works made me cry. It still made me chuckle that a huge outfit like HP bowed down to some obscure Canadian band for the rights to the name Wyrd Sisters. the band that needs no introduction. Teeheehee.

Posted by: Adrien at July 14, 2011 9:10 AM

That was a nice piece, Sarah. I was in my late 20's when I first read Harry Potter (just before Goblet of Fire released in hard cover) and I devoured the first 3 books in about a week before picking up Goblet at its midnight release. I'm a bit surprised by all the reminiscing and end of an era columns but that's because the Harry Potter saga wasn't of my generation. So it's interesting to be on the outside looking in this time but I still enjoyed the hell out of it and can to this day tell you where I was when I first starting reading Sorcerer's Stone.

Posted by: TylerDFC at July 14, 2011 10:26 AM

During the first few weeks of my Junior year of college, I lost a girlfriend in a car accident, totaled my own car, and was told by my parents that they were getting divorced. I was so heartbroken and just a fucking mess. My good friend handed me her copy of The Sorcerer's Stone to keep my mind off of all the crap. I fully credit HP for my retained sanity that year. I feel such affection for that little wizard and his friends.

Posted by: Julie at July 14, 2011 10:40 AM

I think I'll wear my Ravenclaw scarf tonight. I've been debating it. But...why the fuck not.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at July 14, 2011 1:24 PM

My sister reads the Harry Potter books every single night before going to bed. Even when she's exhausted/drunk/sick/anything else, she picks up the books, even for a few pages. She has a stack of the books next to her bed and when she finishes one, she just reaches down and picks up the next. She reads other books, too, but Harry Potter is her favorite and she's probably read the entire series close to 20 times. She definitely has some OCD tendancies so this seemed like perhaps another compulsion. When we poked fun of her for reading these books over and over and over again she told us simply: they make me happy.

And what argument can I give to that? Who doesn't want to be happy in those final moments before going to bed?

Posted by: J at July 14, 2011 4:53 PM

Snuggiepants, you absolutely MUST buy the set of Harry Potter for your daughter before she goes to college! Right after the 7th book came out our mom got my siblings and me the "truck set" of all seven books. Even though we each had some of the books (with the pages bent and the covers ripped off from overreading - typical books for kids who read them at 11) she wanted us to have our own complete set to bring with us in our real lives. My truck in my tiny studio apartment in NYC and is cherished. My fiance makes so much fun of me, but hey! I love them.

Also I talked about my sister above and how much she loves them but I guess this outs me as someone who loves the books (and I suppose the movies too) just as much.

Posted by: J at July 14, 2011 4:58 PM

ugh, a threepeat. I meant "trunk" every time above. as in, this glorious specimen: http://www.amazon.com/Harry-Potter-Boxset-Books-1-7/dp/0545044251/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1310677120&sr=8-1

Posted by: J at July 14, 2011 4:58 PM

J -- me, too. I've read them all at least a dozen times each. Aspergers, whaddaya gonna do?

I am 43. I love these books so much it hurts.

The movies are good -- but not the same.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at July 15, 2011 1:46 AM

This is the first time in years I've missed the midnight opening. End of an era, indeed. Well done, Joanna.

Posted by: welldressed at July 15, 2011 10:51 AM

I made the decision a long time ago to read the Harry Potter books only when the series was complete. I had spent too many years watching patrons at my library put themselves through the agony of finishing one more part of the series and then having to wait another year for the next parcel in the story. Granted, some of them enjoyed the speculation and anticipation in between releases, but I knew I couldn't put myself through that. I finally read through the entire series in 2008. Part of the reason I had not done it sooner was the long waiting list on the copies at my library.

My coworkers and I have expressed some sadness about the end of Harry Potter. The loyal Potter fans who couldn't afford to own the books for themselves would usually bone up on all the earlier stories before the new books were released. They would go through the cycle again before the movies came out. We have always had multiple copies of the various HP books. We have also had to replace almost all of them over the years due to wear and tear. I like seeing books that can stand the test of time, and I enjoy seeing people get excited about the books over and over again. It's rare to find something with the broad appeal of Harry Potter. Oh, sure, there are other series marketed to kids these days. Just don't try to tell me The Hunger Games is going to have the same enduring power. (I loved the books overall, but I still get upset about the way a certain important character spent a lot of time in and out of consciousness for Mockingjay.) Maybe that's what the WSJ meant about Harry Potter "saving" books in a corporate sense. If not for Harry Potter, there would not be a bestsller list of children's books on the New York Times. Someone created an entire new list of books to market just so "adult" authors wouldn't get their collective undies in a bunch over having losing to Harry Potter week after week. For any other latecomers to this thread, it's something to think about.

Posted by: LibraryChick at July 20, 2011 10:22 PM