web
counter
 

They Do It Over There, But We Don’t Do It Here

By Guest Critic Jenny Niese | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (31)



6207_9338603902.jpg

I’m not a big fashionista. I don’t own anything that small hands in India didn’t make, but I could name quite a few designers off the top of my head if needed for bar trivia. I was a loyal “Project Runway” fan, but after watching Valentino: The Last Emperor, I may never go back. Legends of industry, artists who have spent lifetimes honing their magic, are being melted down for brand names to slap on magazine spreads — this is the beautifully tragic message of the Valentino documentary. Part comedy, part love story The Last Emperor was not the fashion retrospective I feared, but a timeless snapshot into the life of a master of his craft.

The movie was filmed over two years and opens with Valentino preparing for his Fall 2006 show, which is three days away. He has finished sketching a signature Valentino Red evening dress when a naked model comes into the viewing room. Like a slightly overbaked Oompa Loompa, he effortlessly twirls yards of sheer fabric around her and in seconds has created an amazing likeness to what he had drawn. His head seamstress is in the room, taking notes and placing pins, before heading back to the workroom where hundreds of middle aged Italian women, like a sea of grandmas urging me to another helping of cannolis, are lovingly hand sewing every piece of clothing for Valentino. Not a sewing machine in the place.

Most of the movie is told through the eyes of Valentino’s one-time boyfriend and business partner of 45 years Giancarlo Giammetti. Their witty banter and playful insults are indistinguishable from an old married couple. Giancarlo reminisces about how he met Valentino at a little cafe and offered him a ride home. Valentino waits until Giancarlo leaves and tells the camera he thought they met at the bar across the street. As Valentino’s business manager, Giancarlo’s financial wizardry made the company millions of dollars and a household name, all the while shielding Valentino in his quest to express his creativity. Giancarlo was Valentino’s white knight clad in a silk suit with matching cravat. Valentino seems oblivious to how his fashion shows are put together, how much things cost, or even how famous he is.

After his 2006 show, the only question people wanted to know was when he will be retiring. The media buzzards circle, hungry for the scoop of his inevitable decline. The movie takes an ominous turn as Valentino genuinely says he never wants to retire. And unlike most aged artists, Valentino’s star has yet to lose its shimmer. Giancarlo explains that a European investment firm has just bought a major stake in Valentino’s company and may or may not renew his contract. To lighten the mood, the company plans an enormous four-day celebration for the 45th anniversary of Valentino. As the movie shows the lavish details and displays of vintage Valentino clothes, we see the investment firm snatch more and more of the company until they hostilely claim the entire soul. It’s heart-breaking to watch Valentino become suddenly aware of what Giancarlo has tried to protect him from all these years.

At the 45th anniversary celebration, while the famous designers are heaping Valentino with congratulations, Tom Ford pulls him aside, expresses his hope Valentino doesn’t retire, and points out “compared to us, the rest are making rags.” As Valentino contemplates whether to get out while the getting is good, the movie laments the decline of luxury labels into licensing their names for belt buckle, oversized bags, and dog carriers just to make their investors money. All the while quality garments get shoved to the back of the closet. Throughout the entire film, I was flanked on both sides by two different sets of fashion whores “ohhing” and “ahhing” at every single solitary fucking garment that appeared on screen and gushing with star-struck-fuckery any time a celebrity appeared. They were completely oblivious to the fact they were the idiots contributing to the cheapening and diluting of a brand name just so they could have a logo on their sunglasses. They praised Valentino as they were sticking Chanel daggers into his corpse.

I went into the Last Emperor expecting a retrospective of Valentino’s whole career and didn’t expect to be quite as entertained as I was. I went from laughing out loud to getting misty eyed. Valentino is hilarious, fascinating, and a one of a kind. While others in his company were flaring with diva-like tantrums that you’d expect from Valentino, he simply shrugs, “I don’t care about the collection. My dogs are much more important.” With that, Valentino saunters off, his five pugs in tow.

This movie was more about a dying art form than one notable designer. Even people who could care less about fashion should remember the words of The Devil Wears Prada’s Miranda Priestly:

I see, you think this has nothing to do with you. You go to your closet and you select out, oh I don’t know, that lumpy blue sweater, for instance, because you’re trying to tell the world that you take yourself too seriously to care about what you put on your back. But what you don’t know is that that sweater is not just blue, it’s not turquoise, it’s not lapis, it’s actually cerulean. You’re also blithely unaware of the fact that in 2002, Oscar De La Renta did a collection of cerulean gowns. And then I think it was Yves St Laurent, wasn’t it, who showed cerulean military jackets? … And then cerulean quickly showed up in the collections of 8 different designers. Then it filtered down through the department stores and then trickled on down into some tragic casual corner where you, no doubt, fished it out of some clearance bin. However, that blue represents millions of dollars and countless jobs and so it’s sort of comical how you think that you’ve made a choice that exempts you from the fashion industry when, in fact, you’re wearing the sweater that was selected for you by the people in this room. From a pile of stuff.


Jenny Niese spends most her time whipping both Prisco and his insane ramblings into a less awkward shape. She works magic with whole grains, and is learning kitchen alchemy to turn simple cakes into fantastic creatures.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The 15 Most Influential Classic Movies | Singing In Tongues









Comments

I need to see this. I am not generally fond of orange people, but I'm willing to make an exception for Valentino. I've taken quite a liking to his wee citrusy eccentricities ever since the Fug Girls started doing those delightfully insane non-sequitor bits about him.

Posted by: Sarina at April 14, 2009 11:31 AM

I've been meaning to read Deluxe: How Luxury Lost its Luster for some time, and it sounds like a companion book to this movie.

Thanks for the review. I will have to go see this.

Posted by: twig at April 14, 2009 11:34 AM

This is rather unfair. A great review prompts me to see a movie that would destroy any last shreds of my fragile masculinity. I have decisions to make.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at April 14, 2009 11:38 AM

Optimus, "naked model." There's your cover.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at April 14, 2009 11:41 AM

Nicely done, Jenny. Clearly, you've taught Prisco everything he knows. I look forward to kitchen alchemy lessons should we ever be in the same wood-neck.

Posted by: Sean at April 14, 2009 12:41 PM

Great review, Jenny!

I find the haute couture industry rather fascinating, to be honest. I love the art of it, the amazing things some of these designers create. But, as with any artistic industry, it's been invaded and largely destroyed by fame-hungry whores with no talent that cater to other fame-hungry whores with too much money. It's sad, and it's become a seriously horrible industry in some respects (like designers prefering to lose money rather than make clothes in sizes bigger than an 8, for example), but every now and then you see a true artist putting some amazing things out, and I have to love that aspect of it.

I really want to watch this now. Seems like a good criticism of what the industry has become.

Posted by: figgy at April 14, 2009 12:42 PM

twig: On Deluxe

You'll slip into a stunned fog and forget to read at around three separate places in that book. It hurts, and will make you consider the teeny white label inscribed with "Made in China" differently for the rest of your life.

Rock in Roll ain't dead, but haute couture? Another story.

Posted by: Sweetie Daling at April 14, 2009 12:53 PM

I still don't care about fashion. It might be an art form, but it's still 90% Form and 10% Art.

Posted by: Neodiogenes at April 14, 2009 1:11 PM

Good review yet it grinds my gears every time I read, or hear, that BULL. SHIT. Miranda Priestly quote.

I'm also glad that all these awful self-important assholes are getting the Wal-Mart treatment and being mass marketed to the "salt of the earth" type folk. Meaning that it warms my heart every time I see some welfare recipient wearing oversize PRADA sunglasses.


Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 14, 2009 1:52 PM

Nice review. Anyone that sprinkles a "fuckery" now and again gets a thumbs up from me.

Posted by: heather! at April 14, 2009 2:13 PM

lovely review, Jenny! I want to see this now. I'm not anything resembling a fashionista either, but the industry definitely holds a bit of fascination for me.

Posted by: lizzieborden at April 14, 2009 5:18 PM

Really nice review, glad to see there are people in the fashion industry who get it:

"While others in his company were flaring with diva-like tantrums that you’d expect from Valentino, he simply shrugs, “I don’t care about the collection. My dogs are much more important.” With that, Valentino saunters off, his five pugs in tow."

That's the truth right there; FUCK "The Devil Wears Prada" and all it's hyperbole bullshit, man I hate that quote. Sometimes people wear clothes because they like the fit, they like how it feels, they like how it looks, or maybe they are just too lazy to care and throw something on.

Not everyone goes through the meticulous history of fashion design and what they've been wearing in sequence for the last month before they decide what type of shirt to put on; some of us just grab a shirt and say "fuck it."

Posted by: Devin at April 14, 2009 8:47 PM

Barbado: not to get completely sidetracked (too late!) but the Priestly quote is completely appropriate in context because the young lady in question is working AT A FASHION PUBLICATION and yet poses as someone who is too "smart" to care about dressing appropriately for the job. The larger point there was that the kid was making a lousy impression in her first job because she was unwilling to take it seriously, or to recognize that her cheap sweater came from the same research/design/culling process as a couture gown. I don't think the intent was to say that fashion is only for the wealthy, or that knockoffs shouldn't exist; the point is that high fashion is the origin point of all clothing, and that writing it off as irrelevant is an oversimplification.
/rant

Posted by: manders at April 14, 2009 10:30 PM

Fashion isn't art? The hell? In it's pure form, by which I mean haute couture from Paris worked on for hundreds of hours by hand, hell yes it is. The trite crap found at Kitson or Intuition in LA isn't art. It's simplistic crap marketed to "starlet" obsessed village idiots.

Valentino is a damned icon and hilariously awesome man. Even if he is no longer a natural skin tone.

Very well done Jenny!

Posted by: Melody at April 14, 2009 11:31 PM

Anyone who says making clothing or creating fashion is not an art has obviously never made their own clothing. It is not an easy thing to do, especially to do well.

Posted by: osmate77 at April 15, 2009 1:16 AM

This really was a great review! I was only mildly interested in seeing this as I was hoping it might allude the the secret behind Valentino's TANG-tastic skintone; however, you have definitely piqued my interest! I hate fashion... I really wish people were not so judged by appearances in any way, shape, or form. But, I have to admit that making clothes can be an art form. And I do love art. So, thanks again!

Posted by: AgoGo at April 15, 2009 2:44 AM

the point is that high fashion is the origin point of all clothing, and that writing it off as irrelevant is an oversimplification.
Posted by: manders at April 14, 2009 10:30 PM

-------------------------------------------

See, I don't think it is, although within the context of those who work in the industry, I guess, *THEY* think the quote is pretty relevant.
But here's the way I see it: People *NEED* clothes, and they have to get made, whether Yves St. Whathisface comes up with a cerulean sweater for next season or not. NOBODY is gonna lose their job 'cause people have to be clothed ANYWAY.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 15, 2009 8:27 AM

"Good review yet it grinds my gears every time I read, or hear, that BULL. SHIT. Miranda Priestly quote."

BSlim,
Could you elaborate on that? What I took from that quote wasn't so much about the millions of dollars and countless jobs, which is what you seem to be focused on. I thought the main point was that if all clothes can follow their trail of influence back to the fashion industry, then no one is exempt from the fashion world. And even their attempts to exempt themselves are influenced by the same industry they claim to hate.

Now, I haven't seen the movie, so I could be taking things out of context here, but I felt that that was the heart of the quote.

Now, if I were to call bullshit on this it would be because I've been wearing plain, single-colored pocket-t's since 2004. My influence came from the fact that I had gained weight and needed new clothes. I hated all the American Eagle/Abercrombie & Felch(couldn't resist) stuff out there and I needed a sustainable source of clothing. You can always find plain pocket-t's(though I've come to find that I'm very particular about my pocket-t's). I'm pretty sure the pocket-t was borne out of necessity(they're not even v-neck), so I say I'm exempt.

Posted by: tnassip at April 15, 2009 11:40 AM

It's just as much bullshit to claim because a piece of clothing is plain or comfortable or worn everyday, it or you are exempt from being part of the fashion industry's influence. T-shirts were originally designed, no doubt by someone who worked in the fashion industry, in Europe as underwear. The lingerie sector of the fashion industry is just as big as the haute couture part. Someone had to research and study which blend and cut of cotton felt most comfortable. Just because it didn't begin life covered with sequins on a runway doesn't mean it magically got manufactured for your local Walmart's shelves.

Posted by: The Land Snark at April 15, 2009 1:02 PM

It's bullshit in the sense of the Miranda character's sense of importance for being in "the biz" (maybe that's how the filmmaker thinks too?). I don't subscribe to the proposition that if CK/Valentino/Versace et. al. don't "bless" us with their genius MILLIONS of people wouldn't to eat.

That's crap, clothing would still be manufactured, maybe just not in cerulean hues.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 15, 2009 1:21 PM

*get to eat

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 15, 2009 1:22 PM

The Miranda character may have a bullshit attitude but the comment that she makes about the fashion industry having a wide reaching influence is not.

The fashion industry is important even to those who don't "care for fashion". It has housed millions of jobs from bullshit magazine editors to teenage store clerks.

Of course clothes would still be manufactured if there weren't any haute couture designers left but food would still be served in restaurants if there weren't any gourmet chefs around as well.

Posted by: Wormer at April 15, 2009 1:34 PM

@ The Land Snark

OK, but it's gotta start somewhere, right? Would you say that the first caveman that skinned an animal and draped that skin over itself was a designer? That was borne out of necessity. I'm not necessarily convinced that the design of my t-shirt constitutes fashion. People like Valentino put on fashion shows, and most people that see their work will never even touch one of their garments. So, I wouldn't say that choosing fabric based on how comfortable it is would be a fashion decision. And if you would agree in my caveman scenario, I would argue* that the t-shirt could just as easily come about by peasants making simple clothing. Maybe once the technology came about, they no longer wanted to bother with wrapping themselves in one or several long pieces of cloth, and instead wanted something that was cheap, covered the body, and needed only to be put on and not arranged. Some entrepreneur could've come along and recognized and filled that need with cheap, comfortable t-shirts. However, while, in this scenario, the t-shirt was designed, I would hardly call that fashion.

Also, if I wanted to be a real dishonest prick, I would say that I chose the pocket-t over the plain-t because nature favors things that are asymmetrical(insert smiley face here).

Anyway, if neither of us really knows, I could see either situation being equally plausible.

* - I admit, I have no clue about this. If you, too, have no clue, then I feel my point is valid. If, however, you do have a clue, I'm screwed. But, you did say "no doubt".

Posted by: tnassip at April 15, 2009 2:13 PM

It has housed millions of jobs from bullshit magazine editors to teenage store clerks.

Posted by: Wormer at April 15, 2009 1:34 PM

Since I don't consider bullshit magazine editing, ESPECIALLY fashion, actual work I'm not sweatin' it. The point *IS* the Priestly character went on some holier-than-thou diatribe that was based on the "fact" that "haute-couture" was necessary, ney CRUCIAL! to millions of jobs... I say, CRAPOLA.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 15, 2009 2:31 PM

Umm.. I really don't get what BSlim is saying. Why argue what isn't reality? Why say that Priestly is wrong because IF major fashion designers didn't exist we would still have clothes?

The point is - fashion designers DO exist, and they influence the shit clothes you see at Wal-Mart and Target. That's just the way it is. It's just funny how these anti fashionistas don't realize it. Yeah, you can dress in slouchy unattractive clothes, but that doesn't mean that if you hadn't worn it out, or bought it too sizes too big, or maybe left it at the store for a garment that flatters you more, the color, cut, or style wasn't influenced by Kors.

Posted by: kayla at April 15, 2009 4:15 PM

"The point is - fashion designers DO exist, and they influence the shit clothes you see at Wal-Mart and Target..."

Posted by: kayla at April 15, 2009 4:15 PM
-----------------------------------
First, of all skip the ad-hominem anti-fashionista slam because you are so way off it's not even funny. Unfortunately, out of work related necessity I'm forced to spend my hard earned money on label douchebaggery.

Second, I've never posted regarding the influence these folks have. My point has to do with the character's assertion that people would go hungry without "haute-couture."
I can't make it any clearer than that, honey.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at April 15, 2009 4:31 PM

"My point has to do with the character's assertion that people would go hungry without "haute-couture.""

@ BSlim

Am I missing something from having not seen the movie? I interpret that quote to just address that character's attempt to deny that the fashion world does impact her life. Personally, I glossed over the jobs and dollars part and took it only to illustrate the large number of people that have affected her life. I really don't see her saying that people would starve without haute-couture.

So, this quote being taken out of context, is there more in the movie that leads you to feel this way? I really don't see how you draw that conclusion from quote alone.

Posted by: tnassip at April 15, 2009 4:47 PM

That movie being "The Devil Wears Prada", not the documentary reviewed here.

Posted by: tnassip at April 15, 2009 4:48 PM

Hmm. Makes me glad I work for a Man that requires I wear a uniform. I don't have to think about what to wear ever.

Posted by: Porkchop at April 16, 2009 12:19 AM

I'm not necessarily convinced that the design of my t-shirt constitutes fashion. People like Valentino put on fashion shows, and most people that see their work will never even touch one of their garments. So, I wouldn't say that choosing fabric based on how comfortable it is would be a fashion decision.

It totally is. The feel of the fabric is called 'the hand'. Literally, it's how the stuff feels, how it drapes, does it have a nap (like velvet or corduroy), is it stiff (like taffeta) or drapey (like chiffon or lightweight rayons). Is there a rib structure to the weave (corduroy or faille)?

Do you like touching it? Would you (or your client) like it touching you?

Fabric selection *is* the base of couture, haute or otherwise, because that's where it starts. Back in B.C. there weren't the choices that we have today, but you can bet Ogg made choices based on what felt warmer or covered more. After all, there's always been tree bark to peel and wrap. Jersey has long been a favorite, due to its stretchiness, which gives considerable ease in wearing and movement.

The further away you get from haute couture, the more economics has to do with what fiber that jersey is made from - silk, wool, cotton, cotton-poly blends - and what details the shirt has.

Yes, the knit T-shirt has been refined into a clothing basic - but so has the Chanel suit. Details (neckline, trim, POCKETS or no-pockets) and colors may vary, but the core design continues, because it meets many people's clothing needs. Just at different price points.

Do you get the average, ordinary T, or do you select the 'athletic' fit? If there wasn't a fashion industry, you wouldn't even have the choice. (By the way, it's possible to actually blow $200 on a T-shirt - and it's 'justified' by how it fits, the neckline, and maybe the fabric.)

Oh and tnassip? You mentioned plain solids for your tees. Do you only wear white? If you get any other color, you too are affected by the fashion industry. What colors are available at any given time is a function of what's 'fashionable', what's in style.

So, even at the bottom of the clothing industry, you are affected by the fashion industry, even if it's just the colors you do or don't like, buy or don't buy.

Just like the lady said.

Posted by: bjs1109 at April 16, 2009 12:56 AM

good review, thanks. i loved this movie, and im rockin a size 16 at target, so i cannot really relate to the clothes part of it..but i was so touched by the relationship of these two fellas. anyone have any doubts about gay marriage just need to see the devotion, caring and mutuality between these two..sigh, what a blessing to have in your life. i cried when 'mio babbino caro' played, too.i am a sop. and the nino rota music was perfect! and those pugs..how wonderful.
not to nitpick, but it was karl lagerfeld, not that greaseball tomford who said, “compared to us, the rest are making rags.” ciao, bella!!

Posted by: devildoggie at April 27, 2009 9:52 PM