web
counter
 

The City Dark Review: I Don't Think This Is What Carl Sagan Meant By "It's Better To Light A Candle Then To Curse The Darkness"

By Seth Freilich | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (9)



the-city-dark.jpg

“What do we lose when we lose the night?” That’s the fundamental question The City Dark explores, a documentary that looks at the impact of ever-increasing light pollution from city glow. The documentary is loaded with talking heads, from astronomers and cosmologists (including the awesome Neil deGrasse Tyson, naturally) to biologists and ornithologists, from historians and criminologists to lighting designers and even the owner of a light bulb store. Through a series of chapters, the documentary looks at the impact of the fact that two-thirds of the human population live under skies polluted by light and what this growing glow means for our pale blue dot.

The obvious impact of the increasing light pollution, caused by our city lights reflecting off of particulates in the atmosphere, is on our ability to view the night sky. As a longtime New York astronomer tells us, folks in New York City have been able to see the Milky Way exactly twice over the past several decades, when there were two city-wide blackouts. Similarly, Tyson notes that thanks to the conditioning that comes with living under a city’s glow and often only getting to see a beautiful night sky in a planetarium, on the rare occasion when he gets to be on a secluded mountaintop looking at the beautifully rich and filled sky, he has the “sickeningly urban” thought that it “reminds me of the Hayden Planetarium.” The lack of true nighttime visibility severely impacts scientists’ ability to study the universe, which harms the general process of science and inquiry. Astronomers try to combat this as best as they can, such as by building telescopes on Hawaiian mountaintops above the clouds or creating dark villages in the middle of nowhere, but they face an uphill battle.

The film goes on to show how it’s not just human inquiry that is harmed by the loss of the night sky. In the most interesting parts of the film, we see how human health itself may be affected, and how animals are also finding their lives complicated by the increasing of light pollution. Apparently, several years ago the World Health Organization declared that working night shifts, because of the disruption to a person’s circadian rhythm, is a probably carcinogen. This was fascinating news to me, and The City Dark wonders about the relationship between this and increase in light pollution, since light at night leads to a suppression of melatonin, which directly affects your circadian rhythm. As for the impact on animals, The City Dark shows the suffering light pollution has caused to certain migrating birds that have evolved to use the stars as their map, or hatchling sea turtles whose evolutionary preconditioning has told them that the bright horizon leads to the sea (where it now leads to Miami). Because the film covers so many topics, it’s not able to hit certain things in as much depth as one might like, and these are the sections that particularly suffer. What is included is good, I just found myself curious to hear more, particularly about how animal life is suffering as a result of our never-ending need for more light.

The doc also looks a little at why humanity has this needs to add more light, and how some folks are trying to meet these needs while also minimizing the impact on the sky and the environment. Ultimately, The City Dark tries to cover a lot of ground and winds up suffering as a result, feeling a bit underdeveloped. The problem that The City Dark tries to address is an important one, and the film does a decent job of exploring this problem, but the breadth of topics covered, which should make the doc feel rich, actually winds up making it rather flat. It’s not a bad documentary, it’s just that it would probably work better as a documentary series, with four or five longer documentary shorts. And to my disappointment and dismay, no Strangers ever show up in the documentary.

The City Dark had its world premiere at South By Southwest 2011.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Better This World Review: The Truth Is, I Thought It Mattered | The Dish & The Spoon Review: A Whimsiquirkilicious Film without Any Whimsy or Quirk









Comments

I think of this issue when I can see even my small college town glow in the night sky from 6-7 miles away. I look differently at shopping complexes that use well-directed, soft lighting vs. the ones lit up like Vegas.

I'm not the kind of guy who goes off to mountaintops to look at the Milky Way, but I certainly agree there ought to be places left on earth for people who want to. And there are getting to be fewer and fewer of them, at least in North America.

What I hadn't realized, much, was the effect it has on other species. That's interesting, in a sad way.

Posted by: , at March 16, 2011 11:20 AM

“reminds me of the Hayden Planetarium.”

We're still renaming Hayden Panettiere?

Posted by: schmerpes at March 16, 2011 12:01 PM

I live on the very edge of Madison where you can still see the night sky fairly well, but last April I went camping in a pretty remote area of Wisconsin. I was literally reduced to the mental capacity of the Double Rainbow Guy once the sun went down. I spent most of the night laying in the grass in complete awe of just how utterly different the night sky appeared. Since it had that big of a positive impact on me, I can only imagine the negative impact th inverse would have on animals.

Posted by: baboocole at March 16, 2011 12:11 PM

My daughter has long loved looking at the moon, since she was about 16 months old. In the last year or so she has actively been studying space and the solar system in her preschool and is endlessly fascinated by it. We've bought her tons of accompanying books, models for her bedroom, all that kind of stuff. But the kid still has not seen a night sky in its true form. She knows it's there in theory, but that's a pretty abstract concept for a four year old. I look forward to getting her out of the city this summer and letting her stay up late enough to see the fully dark night sky. It will blow her mind.

Posted by: katy at March 16, 2011 12:28 PM

This sounds interesting in an academic way. It certainly can't hurt anyone to understand the impact of artificial lighting on flora and fauna. As long as the doc doesn't take the position that this is some sort of crisis. It certainly isn't. Lights are good. More efficient lighting is really, really good.

Posted by: ed newman at March 16, 2011 1:20 PM

I complain a lot about living in a small town and how a lot of good movies don't come here and whatnot but being able to travel merely 20 minutes away and see the sky perfectly is a grand trade-off. I typically stop complaining about my little town when the weather gets nice because I can and do go camping often.

Posted by: Paultera at March 16, 2011 2:43 PM

I'm a NYC girl, lifelong urbanite, and the only time I've ever seen a true night sky is when I paid a tour company to drive me into the desert around Moab, Utah. It was truly incredible. And kind of scary in a "ponderous vastness of the universe" kind of way. I went home and turned on all the lights.

Posted by: RhymesWithSilver at March 16, 2011 9:47 PM

If you want to learn more I suggest this website:

http://www.darksky.org

It is a non-profit group that seeks to educate people about light pollution.

Posted by: EshinX at March 17, 2011 1:03 AM

This film was made by Ian Cheney, one of the guys behind the documentary King Corn. I am really excited to see it. His work has a way of revealing troubling issues without pointing fingers but while also offering hints of emerging solutions. I think it's exciting this issue is getting some attention. I hope the film does well.

Posted by: homeslice at March 17, 2011 2:55 AM