web
counter
 

Satan is Their Motor

By Drew Morton | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (41)



rosemarys-babyf.jpg

For the bulk of my college career, I tended to avoid the films of Roman Polanski. I always tried to validate my blind spot as morally motivated by Polanski pleading guilty to unlawful intercourse with a minor and subsequently fleeing to France. Yet, I came to the realization that this would ultimately write off a work of art, crafted by many people, to the poor decisions of one. Also, I was employed as a teaching assistant for a film noir class at UCLA and we had to show Chinatown (1974) and I could no longer avoid the absence of Polanski in my knowledge about film.

Watching Chinatown, I began to realize that Polanski, personal indiscretions put aside, was capable of genius. Aided, no doubt, by a superb screenplay by Robert Towne, Polanski crafted one of the most tightly constructed films I had ever seen, climaxing with one of the most heartbreaking deaths in the history of cinema. Looking into the production of the film, I learned that this resolution was the invention of Polanski, who had recently lost his wife Sharon Tate to the Manson Family. This pessimistic world view guiding a Hitchcockian attention to film form, in addition to an obsession with sexual repression, stands at the center of Polanski’s films, Rosemary’s Baby (1968) included.

The film begins with Rosemary (Mia Farrow) and her struggling actor husband Guy Woodhouse (the great American independent filmmaker John Cassavetes) looking for an apartment in New York City. The couple finds a flat in the Bramford, a building with a history of mysterious events which Rosemary soon witnesses when a neighbor commits suicide. Briefly after their move, the Woodhouses begin to get close to their elderly neighbors, the Castevets (Sidney Blackmer and Ruth Gordon). Rosemary is somewhat put off by the eccentric couple, while Guy becomes fascinated by them. One evening, Mrs. Castevet brings Rosemary a dessert that causes her to become sick, pass out, and experience visions of being raped by a demon. Shortly thereafter, Rosemary discovers she’s pregnant. You’ve probably already guessed who the father is.

While Rosemary’s Baby is often dubbed a horror film, the contemporary viewer may find that generic attribution confusing. Due to its slow pace and reliance on less-traditional formal tools to create suspense, Rosemary’s Baby, like Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining (1980), is best described as a psychological thriller or suspense story. Polanski’s film, adapted from a novel by Ira Levin, isn’t furnished with bloody murders and shocking off-screen entrances. Rather, what makes Rosemary’s Baby terrifying is the sense of inevitability. Yes, this inevitability not only manifests itself in the plot, as Rosemary is incapable of stopping the plans set in motion by her neighbors, but from the audience as well. Polanski cues us in to the cult’s true intent quite early with the aid of surrealistic dream sequence, so we’re aware of Rosemary’s potential fate far sooner than she is. Hitchcock once described the difference between surprise and suspense as involving the knowledge of the audience, concluding that in order to fully capitalize upon suspense, “the public must be informed.”

While Polanski achieves this through narrative information (Rosemary’s book on Satan worshippers) and film style (surreal dream sequences, odd chants heard in the middle of the night), he also fully capitalizes on the abilities of his crew. Mia Farrow, like Catherine Deneuve in Polanski’s Repulsion (1965), has to keep her character consistently in the grey area between sanity and madness for the bulk of the film. Are her abdominal pains typical of childbearing or from cloven hooves scraping away at her uterus? We squirm in our seats as she tries to make the important distinction. Cassavetes, Gordon (who would win an Academy Award for best supporting actress for her role), and Blackmer make the most of their ambiguous characters, with Cassavetes oscillating between kindness and cruelty and Gordon driving both Rosemary and the audience insane with her grating accent and questions.

The final quality that I found enabling of suspense is the world Polanski establishes. At one point, Rosemary picks up an issue of Time Magazine with the heading “Is God Dead?” Rosemary is a Catholic, experiencing guilt regarding her religion and practicing on a consistent basis. Through these devices, Rosemary’s abandonment of religion and the Nietzschian worldview of the post-1950s, Polanski seems to hint these may be preconditions of Satan’s rebirth. Does this make Rosemary’s Baby a didactic enterprising, preaching that we’re all damned if we stop going to church on Sunday? Not at all, it simply serves the function of making the final scene somewhat reasonable. Only in such a world would a cult, celebrating the birth of the spawn of Satan with cameras, cocktails, and baby toys seem plausible.

Drew Morton is a Ph.D. student in Cinema and Media Studies at the University of California-Los Angeles. He has previously written for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel and UWM Post and is the 2008 recipient of the Otis Ferguson Award for Critical Writing in Film Studies.









Jackman Set for Avon Man | "Big Brother 11" Review













Comments

Nice review. I believe I first watched this with Phillip Stephens. And let me just say, afterward, I could think of two mothers who should have had abortions.

Posted by: pissant at July 17, 2009 12:05 PM

Um, SPOILER ALERT!?

That cat down the hall tipped me off to what a crazy movie this is and I WAS planning on checkin' it out down at the theee-ay-terrr until . . . wait, what year is this?

Oh shit.

Posted by: Kballs at July 17, 2009 12:20 PM

I watched this for the first time last night, blew my mind to see it reviewed today.

Posted by: ashes at July 17, 2009 1:13 PM

I am glad to see someone review this movie. It is still one of the creepiest movies I have ever seen. The betrayal by her husband and the ending get me everytime; I can only watch this movie during daylight hours.

Posted by: androstarr at July 17, 2009 1:26 PM

Ashes: That's some serious shit. Don't go near a ouija board.

Andro: I think it's better than "The Exorcist" which, next to "Apocalypse Now" and "French Connection" is one of the most overrated films of the 70s.

Posted by: Drew Morton at July 17, 2009 2:13 PM

Is that title a Cake reference? I love Cake.

Posted by: Major Etiquette at July 17, 2009 2:32 PM

I just had a small heart attack when I read that you think French Connection is overrated. Then I realized that it was because I was thinking of The Conversation. (I always get the two confused, probably because I saw them around the same time. Plus, Gene Hackman.) Though I do have to say, I don't think The Exorcist is overrated so much as overplayed. It's actually a very good film.

Rosemary's Baby, however, is in my top 3 of all time. (I can't give you a more specific number because they move around a bit...) Polanski's use of the Dakota was really well-done, that's one creepy building. The pacing is superb, and the mood and atmosphere really give me a feeling of dread while watching it. That, and Rosemary's vulnerability, which raises a whole slew of feminist issues to chew on.

You know, this thunderstorm brewing outside me window makes me think tonight would be just an excellent night to watch this again....

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at July 17, 2009 2:35 PM

The Conversation is probably my favorite Coppola film, closely followed by Godfather II. Apocalypse Now is epic, no doubt but the message that war drives men to extremes is too simple to support three-hours. Watching the film, I'm more taken with how Coppola was able to stage such amazing sequences and the backstage drama of the production (see Hearts of Darkness) than I am with the content of the film itself.

My problems with The Exorcist are mainly pacing. Whereas The Shining and Rosemary take their time in the service of suspense, the whole first-act of Exorcist (the medical treatments in particular) just drag the picture down. Of course, I haven't watched it in years so my opinion may have changed, but that was my last impression.

If you're on a Polanski kick, I'd strongly recommend Knife in the Water. That's an uncomfortable couple hours. ;) Repulsion isn't bad, just a bit dated and obvious (sex, either too much or too little, drives people crazy!).

Posted by: Drew Morton at July 17, 2009 2:44 PM

And yes...the title is a Cake reference. ;)

Posted by: Drew Morton at July 17, 2009 2:47 PM

I love this movie. The moment that breaks my heart each time I watch it is Guy helping Rosemary to bed after the poison dessert and she falls in the hallway.

Posted by: Andrew at July 17, 2009 2:48 PM

Great movie, great review. Everytime I see this movie, my heart breaks when Rosemary realizes what Guy has done to her.

Posted by: Carolina Girl at July 17, 2009 3:30 PM

I can stop this car at any time.

Posted by: mswas at July 17, 2009 3:40 PM

"....Rosemary’s abandonment of religion and the Nietzschian worldview of the post-1950s..."


Is she abandoning one or both? Or is one taking the place of the other?

Nietzschean.

Posted by: Recondite at July 17, 2009 3:45 PM

She abandoning religion, not the worldview. Poorly phrased.

As for your correction, isn't it just a stylistic preference Nietzschian or Nietzschean? OED lists EAN as a variation of AN.

Posted by: Drew Morton at July 17, 2009 3:56 PM

Nietzsche is how his name is spelled, thus -ean and -an are identical in case. No stylistic preference.

Posted by: Recondite at July 17, 2009 4:03 PM

OED has both spellings listed.

Posted by: Drew Morton at July 17, 2009 4:08 PM

FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT!

(Hee.)

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at July 17, 2009 4:21 PM

Well, good for the OED.

Holding to original rationale.

It's not Nietzschi...

Posted by: Recondite at July 17, 2009 5:17 PM

I don't doubt your logic but both, as indicated by the OED, are used. I'd write it off as a matter of personal style.

Posted by: Drew Morton at July 17, 2009 5:33 PM

Great review! Very interesting.

I always took the film less literally--not so much a response to the increasing secularization of society as an articulation of the feminist pro-choice abortion discourse that was so prominent in the 1960s.

After all the film illustrates the way a pregnancy is not always a blessing for many women. Pregnancy involves a woman’s body being misappropriated by others, while her unborn child feeds off her like a vampire making her physically ill and mentally drained.

Posted by: 2Sassy at July 17, 2009 7:09 PM

I was struck when I watched this movie and then rewound (yes in VHS days) and saw Rosemary again at the beginning. She went from being so outgoing and happy to so vulnerable and broken (the hair made a great change). As, the change is pretty gradual over the course of the move and you actually miss the full extent of it.

When I saw the movie I wondered what would have happened if her neighbours had tried this stunt 20 years later after the invention of ultrasound? What would you have seen? Probably you'd assume it was some terrible mutation and terminate it.

I also thought that if my husband had had sex with me while I was unconscious I would refuse to conceive on principe and I'd take a quick morning after pill. Pity Rosemary didn't have that choice.

Posted by: ChrisD at July 17, 2009 8:01 PM

A touch inaccurate in regards to Sharon Tate; this movie was released in 1968, and she passed in 1969. Her death affected his next work The Tragedy of Macbeth, in that it become more violent than previously intended.

Posted by: Goldie at July 17, 2009 8:20 PM

2Sassy: Interesting reading, although keep in mind that Rosemary wanted a child in the beginning and that was a key point of pressure in the marriage. The idea of having a baby was held with great desire by Rosemary, the circumstances (demonic rape) and the actual outcome (satan) not so much. ;)

Goldie: The Tate issue was in reference to Chinatown where her death is rumored to have affected the ending of that film as well. How is Macbeth?

Posted by: Drew Morton at July 17, 2009 8:27 PM

Ashes: That's some serious shit. Don't go near a ouija board.
---
Oooo, I had a terrible experience as a young teen. Me and some of my cousins were in my bedroom fooling with a board, and we had our fingertips on the ... thingie, and I closed my eyes, and the thingie slid around the board for awhile as someone called out the letters, and I don't remember what it spelled but I finally opened my eyes and I was the only one with hands on the thingie. Everyone laughed at me because they thought I was pushing it around the board but I was BARELY touching it, just my fingertips.

That scared the fucking bejeezus out of me, and I have never touched a Ouija board since.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at July 17, 2009 10:22 PM

For some reason, I thought one of the most disturbing things that happened in that movie was an actor, the husband's competition, suddenly and irrevocably losing his sight for no apparent reason. Rosemary calls him and he sounds half-crazy, a man on the edge...

I watched the movie for the first time just a few years ago and laughed at the quaintness of this scene: after Rosemary breaks away and goes to see her old doctor, not the Satanist-approved one, she is collected by her husband and the Castavets and forced to return home. Standing in her building at the elevator, she senses it's her last chance to escape - and her escape strategy? She drops her purse. Of course both men immediately bend down to gather her lipstick and compact and what have you, like good gentlemen, while Rosemary bolts for the door. Good luck trying that these days.

Posted by: jkate at July 18, 2009 4:53 AM

While Rosemary’s Baby is often dubbed a horror film, the contemporary viewer may find that generic attribution confusing. Due to its slow pace and reliance on less-traditional formal tools to create suspense, Rosemary’s Baby, like Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining (1980), is best described as a psychological thriller or suspense story.

You use the pace of the film and a different approach to suspense to discredit it as horror? I guess Carnival of Souls, Cat People, I Walked With A Zombie, The Invisible Man, and The Exorcist aren't horror, either, because they move pretty slow and use vastly different approaches to create suspense than simple jump scares and blood.

For me, not only is Rosemary's Baby the shining beacon of hope and integrity in the much-maligned horror genre, it is the single greatest film ever produced. The cast is perfect, the editing sublime, and that score drives me wild. I can't grow tired of it, as I always notice a few new tiny details that make it even better. I can't just credit Polanski, either, as he basically filmed Ira Levin's novel page by page to create the film.

Posted by: Robert at July 18, 2009 8:03 AM

2Sassy: Interesting reading, although keep in mind that Rosemary wanted a child in the beginning and that was a key point of pressure in the marriage.

See, now I kind of agree with 2Sassy, but maybe in a slightly different direction: Rosemary thought she wanted a baby at the beginning of the film, because that was the accepted norm; it's what you're supposed to want, marriage and children, when you're a woman. And Guy and Rosemary were newlyweds, and that's what newlyweds *do*. Plus, Guy was distracted by his burgeoning career, and how better to focus your husband's attention on you? I think you can read the film as how Rosemary experienced that decision, a decision she didn't really want to make but didn't feel like she had a choice; thus, her conception and the beginning of her pregnancy were horrific, then she had a period of acceptance, and then she began to doubt again, and finally, her baby was the spawn of Satan.

Just me? Maybe. I never had any desire for children, and had I lived at that time, I would have been looked upon as a freak (still am a lot, actually. People really do think your body is their business when you're a woman). Perhaps I'm just projecting...

Also, there was that whole Thalidomide thing going on, with deformed babies being a major cause for concern. I'm sure that could be worked in there too.

This is so fun! I like this Drew Morton character.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at July 18, 2009 11:08 AM

2Sassy and Anna: The odd thing is that she never considers the issue of abortion, even when she begins to put the pieces together. She still wants to find some way to hold on to the baby, and does so even she finds out its Satan's spawn.

Robert: I think some would define it as horror, but in the days of Hostel and Friday the 13th remakes I would tend to differentiate Rosemary and the rest of the pack. I love Carnival of Souls though... ;)

Posted by: Drew Morton at July 18, 2009 12:52 PM

Exactly. Abortion was still pretty taboo at the time, and I'm talking about reading it as her reaction to an unwanted pregnancy without even thinking of abortion as an option. Of course she has the baby, because that's what you do.

Sometimes I have difficulty articulating myself... it's like she doesn't even consciously know she doesn't want to have a baby, because that's so far "outside the norm" (in pre-Women's Lib-era thought) that she doesn't want to allow herself to think about it, so it manifests in her vision of the conception as rape (by Satan or by her husband? both are present in her nightmare/vision), in her difficulty during the pregnancy itself, and in the birth of her (thalidomide) Devil-baby. She goes to the baby anyway, because she is the mother and that is what the mother does.

See what I mean? Again, only my personal interpretation (and possible projection), so obviously I could be totally making this up. But I really do believe that this argument can be made.

Either way, I totally want to be Ruth Gordon when I am an old lady. Oh, andCarnival of Souls is awesome. So creepy!

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at July 18, 2009 2:48 PM

Anna,

Perhaps she doesn't view abortion as an option (Roe V. Wade was 1973) but I still do not believe she thinks of the baby as an unwanted pregnancy. I'd be inclined to go with the "we need to have a baby to fit in" reading before the abortion one.

I did find an essay you may want to check out though. "Rosemary's Baby, Gothic Pregnancy, and Fetal Subjects" by Karyn Valerius in College Literature 32.3 (2005).

Posted by: Drew Morton at July 18, 2009 3:23 PM

That's it exactly! She doesn't *think* of it as an unwanted pregnancy, as many women don't. Many talk themselves into wanting a child out of fear of being looked at as (or even being) "unnatural", and I imagine that to be especially true at that time, when the majority of married women did not work outside the home, because that was the man's job, as reproduction was the woman's. That's what I was trying, and failing, to get across.

Even if we drop "abortion" and "unwanted" from the equation altogether, though: we come to the pregnancy fear subgenre of horror. A baby is, quite literally (and as 2Sassy pointed out), a parasite, feeding off of a woman's body for almost a year (and well beyond, depending on whether and how long one plans to breast feed). Her body is not her own for that entire time. She can't eat or drink whatever she likes, because that affects the baby's nutritive intake. And even after the child stops being literally dependent on her for sustenance, it is still unable to hold a job and feed itself; it still depends on the mother for care for many years. Add to that the recent (early 60s) issue with prescribed drugs affecting your fetus, your child; who wouldn't be completely terrified of pregnancy and view the baby as a demon?

Anyway. Sorry. I took a shower and my brain swirled around and around with the water. Thanks for that article, I found it in my college library's website and bookmarked it. It looks really interesting and I can't wait to read it. Right now though I think right now it's time to walk away from the computer and get some sunshine and fresh air. Hooray for discussion! Refreshing.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at July 18, 2009 4:12 PM

Anna,

An interesting take. Think of Alien as a masculine fear of pregnancy! I actually took a horror lit class at UWM on the genre being used (like most) to address societal fears (Frankenstein is also about the fear of Parenthood).

Posted by: Drew Morton at July 18, 2009 4:24 PM

Genre overlap is great, isn't it?

Apparently they can't for some people, though.

Also, you have this "What's going on in our society with all these weird kids?" phenomenon occurring (1968). For the older generation, writing the kids' behaviors off as satanic served as a convenient excuse because of the parents' strong christian roots. There is still this type of backlash in society with respect to various behaviors of the new generation that the old generation does not comprehend.

However, this is complicated by the fact that some of the older generation were Satan worshippers (of the 1930s Aleister Crowley-type) and used young people to accomplish their infernal plots. Throw this into the 1968 "cultural revolution" and it becomes very interesting.

Posted by: Recondite at July 18, 2009 4:36 PM

I read this a long time ago, and it's always increased the creep factor of "Rosemary's Baby" for me tenfold.

Polanski shot this film at the Dakota. A year later, his wife and her friends were slaughtered at his home by the Manson Family, who believed they were receiving coded messages from Beatle records. Eleven years later, John Lennon was murdered at the Dakota.

Creep city!

Posted by: ashleymarigold at July 18, 2009 8:05 PM

"Looking into the production of the film, I learned that this resolution was the invention of Polanski who had recently lost his wife Sharon Tate to the Manson Family."

Let's see, Rosemary's Baby was released in theaters more then a year before tate was murdered by the Manson family and Chinatown was in production 4 years after the murder, which is long enough for Polanski to have gotten over Tate's death as he was dating and banging many chicks by that time.

In other words, stop lying, quit making shit up, and get your facts straight.

Posted by: Cocaine is MyFriend at July 19, 2009 6:41 PM

Cocaine,

You might want to read up on the matter. For starters, check out Roger Ebert's Great Movies essay OR Peter Biskind's Easy Riders, Raging Bulls (page 166 in case you don't know how to use an index).

You're also misinterpreting the subject of my paragraph, which was Chinatown. The seedlings of a pessimisitic worldview are visible in Rosemary as well as Knife in the Water.

Try not getting high on your supply before commenting.

Posted by: Drew Morton at July 19, 2009 9:53 PM

This movie is truly brilliant (as is Levin's novel). Mia Farrow (in one of the prettiest/best-dressed roles for a woman ever) is truly stupendous as the perfect wife-turned-paranoid-turned-absolutely-fucking-correct at the end. It is a true feminist film in that its message is "ladies, if you think some shit is going on and everybody, including your damn doctor, tells you you're crazy, you're still right." All the men are against you! I love it. [caveat: some parents carry this logic too far in 2009 and refuse to vaccinate their kids, but I digress]

No discussion of this movie is complete without singing the praises of the Castavets, their neighbors. Ruth Gordon was truly incredible in that role - funny, but menacing, throughout.

Posted by: samantha t at July 20, 2009 7:34 AM

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Susan

http://toddlergirls.net

Posted by: Susan at July 21, 2009 9:22 AM

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Susan

http://toddlergirls.net

Posted by: Susan at July 23, 2009 9:44 AM

For everyone asking why she didn't consider abortion, remember that Rosemary desperately wanted that baby, and as the film progresses it becomes the one thing she has left to hold onto. The only person she can trust (often speaking to Little-Andy-or-Jenny in times of crisis). At no point does she ever suspect that she's carrying the spawn of Satan, she only suspects that her neighbors/their friends are a coven who want her baby for the sake of sacrificing it. It isn't until she reaches into the bassinet that she understnds what her baby is (and even then she immediately jumps to the conclusion that the coven have somehow mutilated it).

And to Cocaine, Roman slept around with other women while Sharon was still alive. He was a womanizer, period, and it's hardly a surprise he'd be sleeping around five years after her death. However, to suggest that having his eight and a half month pregnant wife and three of his friends suddenly butchered in the middle of the night by a group of maniacs wouldn't have some dark influence over his work and life is a little ridiculous. While it's true that it can't account for the darkness of his work prior to 1969, you have to bear in mind that Polanski's life hadn't been very rosy up until then either (growing up in the Krakow Ghetto during WWII and losing his mother to the gas chamber).

Posted by: Jax at August 22, 2009 10:33 PM

Rosemary to me ( with all the devil stuff aside) represents an unborn woman who has no sense of control of her life. Her character disturbs me much more than the idiots surrounding her. How she demurely accepts everything,and is too quiet and passive.Rosemary is basically your essential "good girl".She is in a coma throughout the film.A victim who has given up her control to the older Patriarchal society,has a husband who throws away her new book telling her it will disturb her(the book on witches);but to me the book really is about her waking up, having choices,knowing what is around her.Something that is forbidden to a polite girl.The anagram is her subconcious showing her the truth.The dead doctor, the cemetary, is her old self being buried,so her new self can form.And as she becomes aware & empowered the traditional forces fight every step of the way and finally entrap her back to her delusions of being the good girl the good wife and now the good mom to a child of deception,lies,and control.And that is where the real tragedy unfolds.And I can't help but shed tears for the death of a woman with so much potential. Rosemary is every women that hasn't escaped or woken up to realize the power she has. Now even though this is just a kitsch horror film I feel it was the only way it could have been marketed to the public at that time.Incidently as Mia Farrow was in filming she broke down,and trugded on as her husband at the time Sinatra sent her divorce papers,he specifically forbid her from filming,he wanted her to be a stay at home traditional wife.....

Posted by: Jessica Petersen at September 1, 2009 2:47 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time