free counter with statistics Moon Movie Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

moon-movie.jpg
The Beating of Our Hearts is the Only Sound


Moon / Seth Freilich

Film Reviews | June 15, 2009 | Comments (30)


As a former card-carrying scientist, and perpetual geek-nerd, I love science fiction. Which is why I hate most science fiction movies — like a fucking vampire, they suck all the goodness out of the genre and then take a big steamer on the leftover corpse. Science fiction done right isn’t just about high-gloss technology, aliens, dystopia, alternate histories, nanotechnology, clones, robots, time travel, space travel, spaceships and off-world exploration, etc. Sure, great science fiction often has one or more of these elements and, done right, that stuff is f’ing cool. But the best science fiction uses these themes and elements, or ones like them, as tools to explore. From Mary Shelley to Asimov, Pohl, Heinlein, and Gibson, from Kubrick to Ridley Scott to Joss Whedon, the science fiction genre, at its best, is put to brilliant use to study and explore not just science itself, but ethics, morality and the human condition.

Moon may not be right up there with the best that the genre has to offer, but it’s damn good. And given the usual crop of crap science fiction that’s thrown at us, it’s a welcome relief. No aliens, dystopic futures, or killer robots. Just a dude living on the moon. That dude would be Sam Bell (Sam Rockwell), a contracted employee of a company called Lunar Industries, which has mostly solved Earth’s energy crisis by figuring out how to harvest helium from sun-soaked moon rocks. Most of the process is automatic, but the company needs someone chilling out on the moon, overseeing operations and getting canisters of the wonderful He3 back to Earth.

As the film opens, we learn that Sam is anxious to get home to his wife and daughter, coming up on the end of his three year contractual term as the guy responsible for keeping the helium flowing. He’s on a little moon base all by his lonesome, save for the base’s sentient robot, Gerty (voiced by Kevin Spacey), and his existence is made all the more solitary by the fact that something on the base is busted, so he can’t get live communication feeds to Earth. So he and his wife are forced to exchange one-way video messages, a sort of lunar/video version of phone tag. Sam, of course, goes through all the chores and rituals one must do when living alone in space, daily exercise to fight the effects of low-gravity, plant cultivation, etc. But when he’s not doing that, or going out to get helium-tubes from one of the automated harvesters, he’s trying to fight the boredom by watching reruns of “Bewitched” while whittling a wood village. Or getting very good at one-man ping-pong. Point being, he be lonely.

The daily monotony is broken up one day, however, when one of Sam’s trips to a harvester goes bad. He survives the accident, albeit a bit bruised and bloody, but when he gets back to the moon base, he falls down the proverbial rabbit hole. Now at this point, I’m going to give away a minor spoiler, but I’m not giving away much since it’s in the trailers and most other reviews. It’s not really any sort of major twist — since it’s the center of the movie, it happens relatively early on, and the film telegraphs what’s coming even before it happens — but if you want to go into the movie with a naivete of not knowing what it’s really about (although knowing it does not diminish your possible enjoyment of the flick), best skip the rest of this paragraph and the next paragraph. So, minor spoiler warning, after Sam wakes back up, he eventually finds that he’s not actually the only person on the moon. In fact, there’s another Sam Bell there. This throws both Sams for a bit of a loop and, as one might guess, the main thread of the movie from this point on is the pair figuring out why there are two of them and what to do about it.

A film like this, with essentially a cast of one, obviously relies heavily on the performance of that sole actor, and the premise sets Sam Rockwell up with the opportunity to deliver a great performance (or performances, if you will). And he knocks it out of the park — from the earlier part of the film, focused on Sam’s utter solitude and possible mental cracking, to the later exploration of individuality, Rockwell is simply a joy to watch. He manages to make each Sam Bell a distinct and interesting character (though the characterizations are largely driven by the ultimate why’s and how’s of the two of them both being there). In a just world, Rockwell would see some award nominations from this performance, but we all know how this game goes.

Aside from Rockwell, the only other actor with any meaningful screentime is Kevin Spacey, as the voice of the base’s robot Gerty. As one might expect when you’ve got a talking computer in space, Gerty is naturally reminiscent of 2001’s HAL. Director Duncan Jones and Spacey wisely use that to the film’s advantage, as many of the scenes between Sam and Gerty have an underlying tension because we, the viewer, don’t know what Gerty’s deal is — because Spacey voices him with just a hint of emotion, we’re left wondering whether he can be trusted. Is he simply an innocuous computer running the base, or does he have some underlying, ulterior motive?

The tension is subtle, but it’s still a nice addition to what is a rather slow-paced film. When we saw Moon back at South by Southwest, the Pajiba crew was decidedly mixed on it — while myself and some others really dug it, there were those who found it drearily dull. For me, Rockwell’s performance was just a pleasure to watch, and I was intrigued by where the movie was taking itself. There are also moments of humor, and little bits of cleverness here and there for the observant viewer. And while Moon could have been a very dark movie, it’s not. It’s not light, either. It just is. With a beautiful soundtrack and an out-of-the-way direction, Jones lets the flick breathe and move at its own pace, in a more-or-less neutral fashion.

This is the first film directed by Duncan Jones (who, yes, is David Bowie’s goofy-looking son), and he does a very clean job with it. A lot of the direction here seems pretty straight forward, given that the film was shot mostly in a closed, tight set with not a lot of stuff actually going on. But I could see a director trying to compensate for that by making the direction and edits quick and frenetic. Jones doesn’t fall into this trap, and if some complain that this makes the film too slow-paced, so be it.

In fact, my only real complaint with the film is that it feels a bit underdeveloped, thematically. I’m not sure if this is because Jones didn’t want to come off as pretentious, or if it’s because the first-time screenwriter (while the story idea came from Jones, the script came from Nathan Parker) just didn’t have the chops to take the idea any further. The premise offers the possibility for deep exploration of some fascinating topics, and Rockwell’s performance touches on some of this. But Jones doesn’t do more than stick his toes into the water and so, while I really like this film, I’m left with a little longing for what it could have been. Because I think the potential was there for this to be that rare breed of a truly fantastic science fiction film. Nevertheless, it is is a very solid sci-fi film, and scads better than the usual shit thrown at the genre.

The film’s only playing in Cali and NY right now, but it’s opening in most major cities over the course of the next month.

Seth Freilich is the one and only.


The Five Most Overused Words by Movie Critics | 2009 Teen Choice Awards Nominations



Comments

I was completely fooled by the title of this film, I thought it had to do with...

never mind.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at June 15, 2009 4:05 PM

Promising. And Sam Rockwell is always a pleasure. Why oh why is he not in more movies? I mean, he's not just talented, he's also immensely likeable. When the character allows, his is one of the most charming presences I've ever witnessed. Why hasn't that translated - and you think it would, naturally - into massive mainstream success?
Grr

Posted by: Alayna at June 15, 2009 4:14 PM

Holy crappity, I can't wait to see this. I could be intrigued by Sam Rockwell reading a newspaper (hopeless actor whore), but throw in an original, intriguing story to boot? And good use of science fiction as well?

Must scrape together money for tickets.

Posted by: ShinyKate at June 15, 2009 4:25 PM

"...the science fiction genre, at its best, is put to brilliant use to study and explore not just science itself, but ethics, morality and the human condition."

Brilliant description of what makes the genre so important to so many of us.
I have been anticipating this one and will be seeing it asap. I'm glad that you found it enjoyable and that you could appreciate the deliberate pace of the film.
And Sam Rockwell? A national treasure and one of our most underrated actors.

Posted by: Spender at June 15, 2009 4:32 PM

please, oh please, let there be an ass shot somewhere in this thing.

Posted by: gp at June 15, 2009 4:34 PM

Nice review Seth, I was pretty curious about this movie already, now I'll definitely have to watch it.

Posted by: Julie at June 15, 2009 4:37 PM

I don't know how this will go over, but I despise 2001. I can handle long movies, but that film was 4 hours long with almost no dialogue, sound effects, or even music. It was just pretentious, and normally I love Kubrick (Dr. Strangelove, A Clockwork Orange).

Posted by: George at June 15, 2009 4:38 PM

So it's "Cast Away" in space?

Nah.

Posted by: Phat girl at June 15, 2009 4:47 PM

i hate 2001 as well, and have never been able to get past the first 30 min. I've tried. Lord knows I have tried. I cannot keep from falling asleep during that movie. But then, I'm not a Kubrick fan.

Posted by: Stella at June 15, 2009 4:56 PM

George: I'm right there with you on "2001". I know my geek card can be pulled for this but I really don't like it. I've tried 3 times to watch it and my opinion just doesn't change. It is damn boring and I usually fall asleep. For the record I also loathe "Snow White" and "Natural Born Killers".

Posted by: TylerDFC at June 15, 2009 4:57 PM

"...like a fucking vampire, they suck all the goodness out of the genre and then take a big steamer on the leftover corpse."

Vampire shit on their victims?

It would have been so much more interesting if this concept had been applied to Twilight.

Posted by: TheBoy at June 15, 2009 5:12 PM

Solaris + Space Odyssey? No wonder it's a mixed review! The premise sounds really cool, the execution maybe a little less than what I would look for, plus it's designed in the vein of 2 of the slowest paced movies on the planet, so..I guess I'm gonna be waiting on this one until I'm either extremely mellow or in a 3-day-long fit of insomnia after having complete my to-do list. Nice review, anyway.

Posted by: lordhelmet at June 15, 2009 5:19 PM

"So it's "Cast Away" in space?"

So, we aren't much for critical thinking today, are we?

I forget the part where Tom Hanks finds he is not alone on the island, and that the other inhabitant is another Tom Hanks*. They surely have similarities on the surface, but it sounds like they explore different things all together.

* - Holy shit! Wouldn't that be a damn pleasant island to live on?

Dear diary,
It is day number 392 on the island. Boy, Tom sure are nice. Tom play off each other so nicely and he are generally just fun to be around. Sometimes I forget that I'm stuck on this island. Gotta go, Tom are doing the piano scene from Big!

Posted by: pissant at June 15, 2009 5:44 PM

Lovely review, Seth. You've got me thoroughly intrigued. I adore Sam Rockwell, and I really hope this comes to town (it can be iffy, even in Bawlmer).

"Maybe you're the plucky comic relief."

Posted by: lizzieborden at June 15, 2009 6:06 PM

See, the problem ya'll are having with "2001" is that you're watching it AFTER 2001. You needed to watch it in 1968, and watch it while high. It's like trying to watch a black and white, silent movie today. You have to watch it in the right context (i.e. drunk, high, and make up your own dialog and sound effects).

Posted by: BWeaves at June 15, 2009 6:14 PM

gp - there most certainly is an ass shot.

Posted by: seth at June 15, 2009 6:21 PM

hey george: 2001 bears fruit upon repeated viewings. now that you know that it's long and largely dialogue-free, you can watch it down the road and not sit there waiting for something to happen. you've got your whole movie-watching life ahead of you--don't consign this masterpiece to the dustbin just yet.

Posted by: icecreammang at June 15, 2009 6:41 PM

In fact, you've probably got time to read the book while you watch the movie, waiting for something to happen!

Posted by: lordhelmet at June 15, 2009 7:01 PM

I never thought I'd see the day we'd have a Tiffany lyric as the title of a post. Nice review Seth, I think the premis and the acting sound promising, but I'm dissapointed we had to sink so low. Belinda Carlisle maybe, but Tiffany? *shakes head*

Posted by: admin at June 15, 2009 7:26 PM

Wait! Tiffany did Playboy didn't she? All is forgiven.

Posted by: admin at June 15, 2009 7:28 PM

Plus, it's not like Tiffany wrote the song, nor was she the only artist to record it. Maybe Seth was thinking about Tommy James & The Shondells.

Posted by: elsie at June 15, 2009 7:51 PM

I cannot read this until I see the film. Fuck!

Posted by: Cindy at June 15, 2009 8:04 PM

Elsie, it's Seth.

Posted by: admin at June 15, 2009 8:18 PM

I am intrigued, and a little mad I didn't catch it during SXSW.
I shall make a note to see it.

On happier news, because no one pays attention to the damn FB group, Alamo Drafthouse might play Mega Shark Vs. Giant Octopus. So there.

Posted by: Sharon at June 15, 2009 9:36 PM

I read People mag's review of the film while getting my pedi the other day (it's true, Nicole's a girly girl sometimes!) and this review has taken the slightly piqued interest I felt while getting mah tootsies buffed and turned into anticipation. Jules, we gots a movie date.

Posted by: Nicole at June 15, 2009 9:49 PM

I have had the pleasure of meeting Sam Rockwell and let me just say, he is a real dear. He took dance classes at dance studio I worked at, working on a film that never seemed to get made. I knew who he was, (though many did not at the time) and he was so gracious and kind and open. He came back a few months ago, wanting to learn tap with his girl. Still so cool. I'm so happy because he IS so good in every film (galaxy quest? people--he wasnt famous then and he ROCKS it) and its always sad when in person a goodie can't deliver as much. He is a sweet one. He's so cool.

Posted by: amandita at June 15, 2009 10:38 PM

I was firmly in Seth's camp at SXSW...loved this movie. I can see your point about the thematic development, but it wasn't glaring enough to dissatisfy me.

And for those of you who are afraid of 2001 syndrome, don't be. Rockwell is mesmerizing.

Posted by: Smokin at June 15, 2009 11:41 PM

Wait! Tiffany did Playboy didn't she? All is forgiven.

Posted by: admin at June 15, 2009 7:28 PM
__________________________________

So did the lovely Belinda Carlisle, admin!

Posted by: Spender at June 16, 2009 12:17 AM

I love that the title on this page is 'Moon Movie Review', as if to distinguish it from a review of the actual Moon.

"Shiny. Round. Oftentimes crescent-shaped.
A cold, distant reminder of the loneliness that haunts us all, and of our insignificance within the greater universe.
Reminds me of pie.
Three and a half stars."

Posted by: Daniel Hall at June 16, 2009 9:55 PM

This movie was really weird. Sam's up in space all alone with a clumsy robot and there's a ping pong table. He hallucinates about a girl you never see again. It is never explained what caused the "twist" in the movie. Good acting but way too many loose ends. It did have potential, but the potential was left untapped. Great idea, no follow through.

Posted by: Paul Anthony at July 26, 2009 10:45 AM