web
counter
 

Portrait of the Artist as a Hot Mess

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (24)



joaquin-phoenix-rapping-big.jpg

Congratulations, we’ve all been had. Though there were brief gaps in the logic of Joaquin Phoenix’s much ballyhooed “retirement” from acting — right after he had been twice nominated for Academy Awards — to start a career as a hip-hop artist, for the most part, it simply seemed like Phoenix had a break from reality and chose to act that out spitting phat beats into a microphone. His brother-in-law Casey Affleck follows Phoenix around, recording his meltdown from behind the scenes and his attempts to break in to the music industry. And by god, it is the bread and circus he promised in Gladiator. It’s one part rockumentary, one part mockumentary, and one part shockumentary — and it adds up to a fascinating study in the 24/7 cult of celebrity that plagues our culture. And it’s all bullshit. I debated whether or not to be like my peers and pull back the curtain on the sideshow, but in reality, it’s always been exposed. Which sucks, because it was a pretty fucking badass social experiment. Like a backyard magician trying to perform card tricks with a surly half-in-the-bag suburban fuckknuckle bellowing “It’s fake! I can see him palming it! Phony!” from the front row, Phoenix’s gambit was constantly scorned and ridiculed as an obvious hoax. But like The Blair Witch Project and James Frey’s A Million Little Pieces, if the end result is still entertaining, does it really fucking matter if it’s true? I submit with Joaquin Phoenix’s two year descent into faux lunacy that it does not.

It’s hard to feel sorry for the hairlipped Man in Black. Oh, boo hoo, you feel creatively stifled for getting paid to essentially be a glorified “puppet.” Guess you’ll have to cry yourself to sleep tonight on your stacks and stacks of cash. Yet, he did lose his older brother to a drug overdose at a tragically young age. And when you achieve even the smallest hint of notoriety or fame, you instantly become free game to anyone with a camera/cameraphone and good dental insurance who wants to shout any disgusting and horrible thing at you. The price you pay, I suppose. But there are plenty of people who make money as performers who manage not to suffer a complete mental breakdown.
I’m Still Here seems to be a commentary on the gossip ghoul mentality. How as a culture we hunger to see people at their worst, but especially if those people are celebrities. Christian Bale freaking out on set, Mel Gibson threatening his baby momma, Britney Spears shaving her head, Lindsay Lohan’s constant drinking binges — this is what we feed on when we slop at the trough. And yet, I guarantee if you put us in the public eye and caught us at our worst, we’d be a hundred thousand times more vile. We cluck at LiLo for getting shitfaced and stumbling out of clubs, but none of us have ever gotten so drunk we threw up Church’s Chicken at 3AM? If my twenties were actually videotaped, I’d definitely be in jail. Friends of mine have photos that will prevent me from ever running for public office. We’ve all had bad days, we’ve all had dark moments, we’ve all hated our jobs. (And if you’re shaking your head saying no, I love my life, then get hit by a prison bus and hurry into heaven now.) And so, I guess it’s an interesting take. It just seems like an awful convoluted way to go about making a point.

Affleck and Phoenix do an amazing job in building this character of the shattered actor. Phoenix is just a babbling frantic spastic mess for most of the film. He doesn’t once doubt that he can become a hip-hop superstar, that he’s got something to say that can only be expressed through angst ridden lyrics about fame. When he gets his chance to present his CD to Sean Combs, Phoenix is stunned when he’s told he’s got work to do and he’s not ready. When he finally makes it to his Letterman appearance to promote his last film, Dave mocks him and his appearance and the audience laughs at him. He’s honestly distraught. You can see in his eyes — he realizes that he’s the joke. It’s like watching someone get tortured in slow motion. and it’s awful.

Or it would be if it were real. The end credits essentially reveal what we’ve seen has been all “written and produced” by Affleck and Phoenix. Which is something of a relief, because otherwise Casey Affleck is the biggest sonofabitch bastard in the world. At first, I thought maybe he was like Hasselhoff’s daughter taping her dad drunkenly molesting a cheeseburger — “I’m doing this to show you what you’re like.” In actuality, he’s just playing along with his brother-in-law. There are a few tips of the hat to the reality of the project before we see that several of the characters are actually actors. Even in a documentary, you can’t videotape yourself doing illegal activities, particularly getting head from a hooker and snorting copious amounts of cocaine. He didn’t really need to quit acting to start a rap career — he could have just cut an album. Larry, his “caretaker and friend,” is an actor I know I’ve seen on film and TV before. Also, his longtime assistant Antony, is actually Antony Langdon, the guitarist for Spacehog. And the man who plays his father in the film is actually Tim Affleck.

But even though this is simply a mockumentary, sitting back and realizing that Phoenix essentially pulled this hoax for something going on three years is something else. He practically demolished his own career for this joke. It’s outstanding. And it’s still a funny film. Particularly the various actor cameos through the film — from Edward James Olmos spouting mountaintop raindrop wisdom, to Puffy playing a less cartoonish version of himself from Get Him To The Greek, to Ben Stiller trying to pitch Greenberg to an angry Joaquin. Which in retrospect makes Stiller’s Oscar appearance as Phoenix that much funnier, considering it was actually a fucking joke on us. The film relies a little much on SHOUTY = FUNNY and bodily functions, but it’s a damn amusing film. Whether this means Phoenix will rise again from the ashes — now that this all came out as a put-on — or if he’ll seriously just stop acting remains to be seen. I hope he faux-marries Britney Spears and they make a sex tape. Because what else is there going to be for us to read on the internet?









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba Love 14/09/10 | Terriers Review | It's Like Raaaiiiin, On a Rainy Day









Comments

so...you liked it?

Posted by: banana at September 14, 2010 1:17 PM

His level of commitment has been enough to make me want to see this. I appreciate the occasional attempt to hold up a mirror -- as with any performance art, all along this has been about audience reaction as much as about the thing itself.

Posted by: sansho1 at September 14, 2010 1:21 PM

Prisco, I read your reviews because they are thoughtful and enjoyable - and I do respect your opinion. But I don't think anything would make me want to see this; there doesn't seem a point. I can't imagine who thought Phoenix's performance was in any way "real" and it all just sounds like a load of garbage.

Posted by: Cindy at September 14, 2010 1:39 PM

I honestly didn't give a fuck that he was spiraling out of control...fake or not.

I didn't give a shit that Britney Spears flipped out...nor that Lindsay Lohan has destroyed herself.

I could care less about the celebrity side of celebrities.

This kind of sounds like a skit on Jackass that just went on entirely too long.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at September 14, 2010 1:42 PM

Wow. Now THAT is art.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at September 14, 2010 1:42 PM

So, we're going with no one would come out and say this was a hoax immediately? Cause I remember that happening all over the place. Even here. I also like to think they delayed the release of this film to make people forget how many of us were calling out "bullshit."

I still want to see this as a commentary on the lens of the media and how we respond to the downward spiral of fame, but I'll go in knowing (like I already did months and months ago) that it was all fake.

Posted by: Robert at September 14, 2010 1:49 PM

I know I'll get flamed for saying this, but it's very Kaufman-esque. Blurring the lines between practical jokes, acting insane, and out and out insanity is exactly what Andy did. Phoenix just did what Andy might have done had he been around for the 24 hour news cycle, the culture of internet memes, and "celebrities" who are famous simply because they are famous. Kaufman would have had a field day.

In that sense, the guys behind Christwire follow in that same vein.

Clifton lives!

Posted by: alphawhiskey at September 14, 2010 2:02 PM

I was seriously thinking of Kaufman when I first heard Affleck was documenting it. Good call.
Fuck if it's fake or not, it sounds entertaining as all hell.

Posted by: Patrick Cooper at September 14, 2010 2:15 PM

I know I'll get flamed for saying this, but it's very Kaufman-esque.

No flames here, I agree - although Kaufman would have kept you guessing forever on whether he was in on the joke or was the joke.

-Frob

Posted by: frobme at September 14, 2010 2:20 PM

It is a lot like Kaufman.

I hate Kaufman.

Posted by: Courtney at September 14, 2010 2:21 PM

I was delighted to see Brian Prisco's name on this review, & paused a second to think how pissed I might have been if anyone but Brian had done it.

I managed to distill the last two sentences of the first paragraph, correct me if I'm wrong: if the end result is entertaining, does it really matter if it's true? and that no, it does not.

"He practically demolished his own career for this joke. It's outstanding. And it's still a funny film."

Okay, I 'get' that it's a joke. But it was a "relief" seeing the ending credits to show that it was? That seems to imply that the 'mockumentary' is a mostly uncomfortable experience to sit through, until the "relief" at the end.

And I'm left with more questions: is this "funny" like one of those Sasha Cohen films that subject regularly 'normal' people to situations that aren't so normal, apart from the camera & lights in the background, making their discomfort the "funny" of the film?

The Letterman appearance was brilliantly described, and totally accurate- it's "awful," as Brian writes. So that certainly isn't a part of the "funny" in this film, right?

Is it funny like Jackass-The Movie, where there is a clearly-defined form of humor that appeals to a certain demographic, where the "funny" is purely subjective (and there's nothing wrong with that)?

Would it make any difference how funny the film is depending on whether we even like the 'actor' it focuses on?

I apologize if anyone takes this as the least bit sarcastic, or sneering, or a lame attempt at 'insult humor': I'm not stupid enough to cross swords with this reviewer, I'm just being as honest as I can when saying I'm a big fan of Mr. Prisco's, I even love this review, but this "awful(ly) convoluted way to go about making a point" remains convoluted to me.

Hell, it's taken forever just to write this, hopefully the commenters posting during this time have already provided some answers that I just didn't get from Mr. Prisco's otherwise great review.

I also keep in mind that I'm not yet fully functional at work or anywhere else on a hot, miserable Tuesday- wouldn't be the 1st time I missed the point.

Posted by: abliac at September 14, 2010 2:58 PM

WHOA, THANKS COURTNEY!

You're the first comment I saw when I clicked, and that one ALONE gives me a more concise impression than the review did.

Thank you!!

Posted by: abliac at September 14, 2010 3:00 PM

What kind of drooling moron do you have to be to believe they were ever doing anything other than masturbating each other's ego?

Posted by: Wembley at September 14, 2010 3:48 PM

I think seeing the movie was worth it just to think about it. Although it did involve me cringing from discomfort for the majority of it, the way I cringe at most reality TV shows, which is kind of what this movie was like. There's got to be some kernels of truth that were mixed into the planned stuff, but it's still engaging. And if this is just a way to get out of showbiz for Joaquin, it's kind of genius.

Posted by: kelsy at September 14, 2010 4:08 PM

I'd say it was art if anyone was actually fooled, but was anybody worth fooling actually fooled? I mean, sure, I had the occasional moments of doubt where I thought maybe he really was crazy, but they were like the moments of doubt when I step on an airplane and acknowledge the tiny chance that this might be the one that goes down. That's no achievement as far as I'm concerned. This movie is a monument to my annoyance with Hollywood and its life up its own ass. And I LIKE Joaquin Phoenix.

Posted by: Eep at September 14, 2010 4:43 PM

"Hairlipped"?! Oh, for fuck's sake...

Hairlipped = Having an upper lip that is mustachioed (see: Sam Elliott)
Harelipped = Having an upper lip that resembles the cleft lip of a hare (see: a god-damned rabbit)

Seriously, you guys are smarter than this...or at least you act like you are.

Posted by: Jen at September 14, 2010 7:50 PM

OhhhhYeaahhh!
Watching a bunch of overindulged idiots cum into their own (mouths). Yesss.... That is SO ART, so... so POP! So... dear lords, we must appreciate and fondle this excersie this in journals on po-mo pitty-porn.


Fuck you.
If this is what you consider interesting and daring, Camille Paglia must be your God.

Posted by: HMDK at September 15, 2010 3:03 AM

Who?

Posted by: alphawhiskey at September 15, 2010 8:47 AM

Good for him. I liked him in something, I don't remember what, but he was great and two thumbs up and four stars. Didn't he play Casey Jones in Ninja Turtles? Yeah, that's what I saw him in. I love that movie.

Posted by: Lucas at September 15, 2010 12:49 PM

I am anticipating an absolutely stunning comments section for this review. Clearly folks do not like their media to be self-aware.

It's really weird to read responses from people that basically resolve as, 'I hate it because they tried to trick me with a message! On purpose! I can totally tell!'. As though the act of being engaged (or the attempt to engage) is worthy of instant disdain.

Somehow the notion of a media message being carefully crafted - in any obvious way - gives some folks a clear point to digress from, and the thrilling simplicity of the ruse generates the most basic of black vs. white responses.

We don't hate SJParker because she's ugly - we hate her because we're TOLD SHE'S PRETTY!

We don't like Joachim's film because it's bad, but because we knew he was TRYING TO SAY SOMETHING IN A TRICKY WAY!

This product is a LIFESTYLE CHOICE, I'm not sheeple!

It's just one big - 'I see what you did there! I shan't be PWND!'

Posted by: replica at September 15, 2010 4:00 PM

More of that ol "putting unknowing random people in uncomfortable situations with borderline behavior and filming it" humor. Not for moi

Posted by: Protoguy at September 15, 2010 6:27 PM

"Whether this means Phoenix will rise again from the ashes..."

Jesus, so that's what a 'douche chill' is. I'd heard Americans use that phrase, but now that my spine feels like it was hit with a sledgehammer, I understand it. Prisco, you're better than that.

Also, I'm now much more interested in this film than I was before. So at least the rest of the review that wasn't a tear-inducing pun did a damn fine job of selling the film.

Posted by: Steve at September 16, 2010 4:31 AM

abliac
"how pissed I might have been if anyone but Brian had done it."
Huh, it must have been typing that while sucking Priscos dick

Posted by: Jack Random at September 16, 2010 11:39 PM

This seems as close as we're going to get to some present-day Andy Kaufman shit and I'm looking forward to checking it out.

Though, the difference between Kaufman and Phoenix is that we would have never, ever known for sure if Kaufman was putting us on or not.

Posted by: Seany D at September 17, 2010 12:07 PM