web
counter
 

Battle: Los Angeles Review: Enough Small Boom, Let's Boom the Boom

By William Goss | Posted Under Film Reviews | Comments (32)



alg_battle_los_angeles.jpg

Every bit the Black Hawk Down-War of the Worlds hybrid that it’s being advertised as, Battle: Los Angeles is a loud and proud piece of semper fi sci-fi, occasionally thrilling, periodically groan-inducing and thoroughly familiar in its efforts to imitate ground-level warfare against a biomechanical menace.

Staff Sgt. Nantz (Aaron Eckhart) is on the verge of retirement, naturally. After 20 years in the Marines and one seriously rough tour in Iraq, he’s putting in his notice — a notice rendered null and void by an incoming alien invasion. Nantz is assigned to a platoon that’s being dispatched to Santa Monica; their orders: save some civilians that are holed up in a police station and high-tail it out of there before the place gets leveled.

Jonathan Liebesman’s direction puts the busy and loud aesthetic above all else, with a camera that’s often antsier than it needs to be, but for a few critical sequences — namely, a gas station gambit and a freeway siege — he establishes geography well and sustains tension nicely. At other times, the narrative does resemble that of a first-person shooter: point A, point B, point C, big boss; it’s just that some skirmishes end up more exciting to watch than others.

Christopher Bertolini’s script traffics strictly in hoary archetypes — the rookie soldier (several in fact) excited by the prospect of conflict and then terrified by the harsh reality of it, the nigh-retired officer with a troubled past who must redeem himself, the guy with a grudge against said officer, the woman who can hold her own alongside the men, etc. — and the dialogue usually isn’t much better. It seems that the only thing worse than interchangeable grunts grunting are characters that we’re clearly meant to care for adhering to formulaic fates throughout. The film gets off to a sluggish start with its introduction of the entire ensemble, with each member having one defining characteristic or less, and the second act comes to a halt so that Eckhart’s character can deliver a tearful speech before capping it off with “But none of that matters right now.” He’s right. It really doesn’t.

Until that point, though, Eckhart sells that moment well, and his default stoicism (read: that chin of his) manages to make at least one character worth remembering, let alone worth rooting for. Michelle Rodriguez pops in to play Tech Sgt. Michelle Rodriguez, while Michael Pena and Bridget Moynahan take turns either holding children’s hands or proving surprisingly handy for a civilian. Everyone else in the unit is fairly nondescript, with wives they love and friends to lose, and they’re often left to dole out the obvious before being picked off.

Therein lies the dilemma of whether or not these characters should matter. We don’t care in monster movies; we should care in war films. The archetypes worked in Aliens, ostensibly a monster movie more than a war film; Battle: LA is clearly more the latter type and yet couldn’t feel lazier. It’s possible to make scaled-back spectacle work effectively — Cloverfield knocked it out of the park, personalizing the panic with its approach — but Liebesman’s goal here is mayhem first, and in that regard (and that regard alone), he succeeds. These are the same old fireworks seen from a different vantage point, and only you can tell me if that’s worth your $10.

William Goss now lives in Austin, Texas.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Deus ex Machina by Andrew Foster Altschul | A Much-Needed Reminder That One Sheen Still Has The Profound Power To Make Me Perspire









Comments

"Michelle Rodriguez pops in to play Tech Sgt. Michelle Rodriguez". That's just great and precious. I don't know if I thank you for pointing that our or... Well, yes, definitely thank you.

Posted by: godzilla_foil at March 11, 2011 12:32 AM

Thanks for the plot synopsis. Can we have the review now please?

Posted by: Vick at March 11, 2011 12:35 AM

Now all I can think of is Michael Peña handing out vitamins and personality tests during an alien invasion with Flight of the Conchords playing in the background.

Posted by: Uda at March 11, 2011 12:36 AM

So it's exactly what it meant to be -- a better version of that shitfest, Skyline.

I'll still go see it. Lord knows that after all the Oscar movies melodrama I need me some 'splosions!

Posted by: Fredo at March 11, 2011 12:56 AM

I will be going to see this movie... but because I simply don't believe in California, I'll be rooting for the aliens.

I for one welcome our new Digitally Rendered Alien Overlords, and look forward to a position working in one of their sugar mines or rendering plants. In an advisory capacity of course.

Posted by: Wintermute at March 11, 2011 1:35 AM

Michelle Rodriguez is always there when you need your tough-as-nails, sneering girl soldier/boxer/cop/whatever she was in Resident Evil. She's not gonna take your shit, you know, but deep down, she's a really good person.

Posted by: John G. at March 11, 2011 4:36 AM

Flight of the Conchords reference. You, sir, win the internet

Posted by: Laurie at March 11, 2011 8:01 AM

As I was reading the first paragraphs and the bit about the archetypes I was thinking "Michelle Roriguez and her huge schlong need to be on this" and then BAM up she pops.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at March 11, 2011 8:21 AM

"We don’t care in monster movies; we should care in war films."

This is right on. Aliens is not the best example to look at, because it is in a class by itself, but this works as a general rule.

I think the horror/war hybrid worked in Aliens because we pretty much knew they were all going to die. Since it was a sequel to Alien, I expected a "final girl" kind of horror movie, even though most of the dead teenagers were Space Marines.

Posted by: The Mutt at March 11, 2011 8:35 AM

If they're gonna use stock characters, they should have used stock characters from other genres to keep things interesting: Moynahan should be accompanied by her superqueeny best friend, Michael Pena as the hooker with a heart of gold, Eckhart as the nerdy soldier in need of a makeover (which he doesn't need because beauty comes from within), Rodriguez as the manic pixie dream sargeant. These plus explosions equal the Palme D'Or.

Posted by: sars at March 11, 2011 9:33 AM

Where's Duke Nukem when you really need him?

Actually this looks like a prequel to Duke Nukem 3-D (A video game title not a movie- Honest) Where the "hero" mercilessly kicks alien ass out of a bombed-out L.A.

Well if Schwarzenegger really wants to do a movie again, a sequel to this one as our boy Duke might be the ticket. He'll just have to live with Bruce Campbell dubbing over him.

Posted by: bleujayone at March 11, 2011 10:05 AM

I so wanted this to be good.

I knew it was going to suck.

Because I so wanted this to be good.

Shit.

Posted by: , at March 11, 2011 10:22 AM

Fun Fact: Michelle Rodriguez actually died during the making of Resident Evil. Every role she's been in since has been reused footage and dialogue.

Posted by: Paultera at March 11, 2011 10:30 AM

i will be going to see this with my husband for only $4.50 a piece.Thanks livingsocial

Posted by: blacksred at March 11, 2011 10:32 AM

Eckhart must be a shitty soldier if he only made Staff Sgt after 20 years. And Rodriguez beter be a REMF and not an infantryman or I'll be pissed.

That's right, I'm bitching about the military in a movie about robots from space.

Posted by: the EPA at March 11, 2011 10:35 AM

Oh sars, I would sooooo go see that movie.

Posted by: JenVegas at March 11, 2011 10:40 AM

sars, I may have to wear a mask to do it, but I could kiss you for that comment. In the spirit of Cannes. On the lips. With tongue (through the mask). Sloppy. Wet. Kind of disappointing. Like the French do it.

Posted by: RobP at March 11, 2011 10:50 AM

RobP, gotta buy me dinner first.

Posted by: sars at March 11, 2011 11:03 AM

I second Vick's response.

Posted by: Eva at March 11, 2011 11:57 AM

"I will be going to see this movie... but because I simply don't believe in California, I'll be rooting for the aliens."

What, it's just a conspiracy of cartographers, then?

Imma watch the hell out of this. I love me some alien invasion movies. I might even watch ID4 again before I go.

Posted by: figgy at March 11, 2011 11:59 AM

From Roger Ebert's review: Battle: LA is "an insult to the words 'science' and 'fiction,' and the hyphen in between them."

Ebert for the win.

Posted by: Matt at March 11, 2011 12:31 PM

They remade ID4 ?

Posted by: Mr. Stitch at March 11, 2011 12:53 PM

figgy! What with the Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead reference of the year. You saved today from the earthquake. I love you so much.

Posted by: judochop at March 11, 2011 1:44 PM

Rodriguez is an Air Force ELINT specialist and not infantry.

Posted by: Adam C at March 11, 2011 3:55 PM

Haters gonna hate, but I'm going to put it out there. If you liked Armageddon at ALL, you'll enjoy this movie. Stuff 'splodes. People die. Humans win. Do you really NEED much else? No it doesn't have a Big Message (beyond "Marines are really badass, and by the way you should join") but I didn't go wanting a larger theme either. It works really well as it was intended, an action-y war movie with space things in it.

I enjoyed the hell out of it.

Posted by: Roaddog at March 11, 2011 4:32 PM

Humans win?

Clearly you're not taking the long view on this.

Posted by: Recondite at March 11, 2011 4:42 PM

This movie kicked ass.
Highbrow? Of course not.
Sci-fi? BARELY.
It's a war movie. If it were Sci-fi, the baddies would have had lasers and shields and cloaking devices. They didn't. They had armor and projectile firing weapons. Their ships had jet engines for godtopus' sake! It was a little over the top at times with SEMPER FI and whatnot, but a bad movie?
My ass.

Posted by: grendel at March 11, 2011 9:11 PM

I'm thankful that Michelle Rodriguez is starting to be a surprise in a cast and not a showcased talent. Maybe that means I'll be treated to not seeing her in the not so distant future. I would like to believe that Paultera is correct about Resident Evil being her last living performance. It was the last time I had patience for her in anything. At least her character sorta fit. But other than the magnificently terrible Bloodrayne (oooh Uwe Boll, there is a parallel universe somewhere that welcomes your films with open arms, that is the real tragedy) Michelle Rodriguez is always the same. I have never understood her longevity. And I cheered when Michael killed her on Lost, though screamed seconds later, poor Libby. If they are using stock footage of her, they need to use the frames of Harold Perrineau shooting her and maybe I'll want to see their silly movie

Posted by: protoformX at March 12, 2011 2:13 AM

I'm thankful that Michelle Rodriguez is starting to be a surprise in a cast and not a showcased talent. Maybe that means I'll be treated to not seeing her in the not so distant future. I would like to believe that Paultera is correct about Resident Evil being her last living performance. It was the last time I had patience for her in anything. At least her character sorta fit. But other than the magnificently terrible Bloodrayne (oooh Uwe Boll, there is a parallel universe somewhere that welcomes your films with open arms, that is the real tragedy) Michelle Rodriguez is always the same. I have never understood her longevity. And I cheered when Michael killed her on Lost, though screamed seconds later, poor Libby. If they are using stock footage of her, they need to use the frames of Harold Perrineau shooting her and maybe I'll want to see their silly movie

Posted by: protoformX at March 12, 2011 2:28 AM

this movie was very good. glad i didnt wait for the dvd and i cant say that about a lot.

Posted by: blacksred at March 12, 2011 6:44 PM

the Missus picked this movie and it was ok. Not great not bad just ok. All the characters are stock but they all try hard and Eckhart does as much as he can with what they give him, which is a stock character. The aliens must of been some kind of space pirates because their tech was LOOOOW. Which actually makes sense if marines are gonna save the day. It's almost an old fashioned war movie really. John Wayne, who's mentioned, would of approved.

Posted by: logan at March 13, 2011 1:14 PM

The patriotism and military glorification in this movie is the most ridiculous I´ve ever seen. I guess since pretty much everyone on the planet has had ample opportunity to come to their own conclusions about the "heroic US marine" stereotype by now, aliens are the only possible enemy left not to make a movie like this look like "Triumph of the Will".

Posted by: Qualtinger at April 27, 2011 9:39 AM