web
counter
 

The Mysteries of Pittsburgh by Michael Chabon

By kingsmartarse | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (15)



mysteriespittsburgh.jpg

My first experience with Michael Chabon was the magnificent work, The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay. I had never heard of Chabon, and instead picked up the suggested work as a comic-book fan who revels in the behind-the-scenes of making comics and its storied history. It easily became a favorite, and is widely considered Chabon’s “magnum opus.” Having never heard of Chabon before Kavalier, I was surprised to learn it was, in fact, his third novel. Possessed by the incredible quality of Kavalier, I found myself wondering about his first book, which served as his thesis in grad school, and the vehicle between his status as an amateur student-writer and praised professional. And now, I’ve finally come to the beginning.

The Mysteries of Pittsburgh is a story about the summer after college graduation for Art Bechstein. It’s that odd time between the fairy tale of youth without responsibility and stepping into the real world and the person you will be for nearly the rest of your life. It was meant to be an easygoing time, a lazy time, but it quickly turns into a summer of loss and gain and learning for Art. By August, Art is changed by the questions he had never tried to answer, thoughts and discussions he’s avoided, and people from whom he had shielded himself.

In terms of writing, Chabon accomplishes what he continues to accomplish in his later work: A balance between detailed narrative and interesting dialogue. I’m typically a fan of character dialogue; it can tell you more about a character personally, and if done well, helps you empathize with those characters more easily and wholly than a narrative. It makes the characters seem less fictional. With Chabon, I think he actually is able to achieve this equally through both narrative and dialogue. His narratives are so telling; Chabon picks exactly the right details to tell you about a person, he tells just the right story, the right fictional anecdote, that you feel as though you know exactly who this person is without having to hear his/her entire life history. When you read the dialogue and speech of the characters, it reinforces these personalities, these likes and dislikes and quirks, and makes the characters real. You don’t feel like you’re reading a work of fiction, that you’re reading invented characters. Chabon’s story telling makes every character seem like a real person, someone you might meet out in the street, at work, or at school.

Perhaps it’s Chabon’s gift for characterization that makes Art Bechstein and his story worthy of standing beside characters like Tom Sawyer and Holden Caufield, and novels like On the Road and Catcher in the Rye (as some literary critics have put it). After reading Bright Lights, Big City, I touched on the similarities and differences in character I saw between Holden Caufield and the Unnamed Protagonist of Bright Lights. Holden had a way of thinking and speaking, but he seemed cynical of the “real” world and unable to grow and adapt or prepare himself for it. Unnamed Protagonist was similar in his quirks of thought and speech, but he was on a road of redemption; having tasted and experienced the lower levels of “Hell,” he realized and strove for personal growth. Art Bechstein is faced with this “coming of age” point in his life, but he neither refuses it like Holden or embraces it (at the end) like Unnamed Protagonist. He kind of just lives it. He has no agenda, no plans for this life. Art just seems to react and live through the moments and the people who enter his world, and I think it’s that quality that makes him easy to relate to, and easy to believe. The strings attached from story teller and story are not easily visible, therefore, Mysteries feels like a story you might have seen before, in yourself or in someone you know.

In that sense, the pieces seem to fit. Chabon wrote The Mysteries of Pittsburgh as he was graduating from grad school. Even though the events and characters are fictional, since Chabon was in a similar time in his life, he was able to wonderfully narrate the emotions and thoughts of that time in Art Bechstein’s life. The last few pages seem a bit cliche and rehearsed, with Art recounting the memories of that summer in the way that still-young people look back and reminisce about even younger times from which they grew. But it’s fitting. There is no one better to tell the nostalgia of so-called glory days of youth than a youth himself.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. For more of kingsmarte’s reviews, check out his blog, Feeling Red.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Blog Trends from My Bunk 03/15/10 | Baltar on Eureka, Three Inches, Battlestar Spinoff









Comments

kingsmartarse, you rock. This was a great review. I've actually never read any Chabon, but Kav & Clay has been in my queue forever, and now The Mysteries of Pittsburgh is going to go right next to it.

*sigh* So much to read, so little time...

Posted by: Jelinas at March 16, 2010 9:31 AM

I've been hesitant to read any of Chabon's other novels because I really disliked Mysteries of Pittsburgh quite a bit. I agree with the comparisons to Catcher in the Rye, mostly because the similarities between two self-obsessed main characters are spot-on.

I can usually appreciate good writing even when I despise the protagonist, but in both those cases, I just couldn't get past it. I'd truly hate Holden and Art as real-life people. At least until they grew up a lot.

Posted by: Wednesday at March 16, 2010 9:53 AM

I wonder if you have to be a certain age to appreciate this. I read it a couple years ago and while the characters were engaging (every man should have at least one Phlox in his life) and I knew some of the actual places being referenced, I just don't get why it's considered such a classic. Maybe it's because I never had any loaf time once I got out of college. I graduated on a Sunday and went to work the next day. This "summer of figuring out who you are" stuff, who gets to indulge themselves like that in the real world?

BTW, fans of the novel might find this piece about the real "cloud factory" interesting:

www.post-gazette.com/pg/10028/1031690-155.stm

Posted by: , at March 16, 2010 9:54 AM

Wednesday hits on something I kind of agree with. I didn't actively dislike Art, but my memory is that he's the least interesting person in his own story.

Posted by: , at March 16, 2010 9:56 AM

I have no idea where anyone read that this was considered a "classic" but it is NOT one and should not be considered one. It's exactly what it is: grad school creative writing. Chabon was certainly trying to find his writing voice, here, and there is much to admire. However, the book was largely forgettable and made no real impression on me, even though I was only a few years older than the protag when I read it. I'd warn against the feeling that just because it's Chabon means it's bound to be good.

Posted by: gunnertec at March 16, 2010 10:21 AM

I actually just read this two weeks ago. I'm the kind of guy who likes to finish a book and jump right into the next one (Walker Percy's Love in the Ruins), but found myself so attached to Mysterious of Pittsburgh that I had to digest for a week.

There is a current of retreading certain thematic elements you find elsewhere in classics, ie. Catcher in the Rye, in Mysteries, but not with out something new to say. I actually found it more akin to The Great Gatsby, with the idea of being swept up by beautiful, exciting people, and their self destructive narcissm.

Great book.

Posted by: Brian at March 16, 2010 10:22 AM

I've been reading/watching a lot of books/movies that have the "coming-of-age" theme (Adventureland was really good) and I can't help but wonder, while reading your review, when the HELL DOES MINE HAPPEN?? Or have I already came (ha ha)? and I just missed it bc i don't live by a script?? I just graduated from college last May and have pretty much been working non-stop since... unless if it happened before graduation...

GAH this is gonna bug me for the rest of the day now.

Posted by: dene at March 16, 2010 10:35 AM

I'd say that if you graduated from college and are able to hold down a job now, you probably came of age long ago, in the usual fashion. You only hear people who don't want to or are unable to grow up making a big deal about it.

Posted by: AM at March 16, 2010 10:42 AM

Great review Kingsmartarse , and I'm glad you chose Mysteries as it's one of my favorite books. While I would never argue that it's destined to become a classic, I think it's an extremely well written book, and one that possesses an incredible insight into the turbulent emotions of youth--pretty remarkable for a 24 year old's debut novel. Maybe it was just because it caught me at a good age, but Mysteries stayed with me for long after I read it. I also agree with what Brian said above, there was definitely a Gatsby -esque element to the book. It's worth reading, if only to see the first complete effort of a tremendously talented writer.

Posted by: Adrienne at March 16, 2010 1:19 PM

I have no idea where anyone read that this was considered a "classic" ...
---
The director of the movie, for one:

Director Rawson Marshall Thurber (“Dodgeball”) compared it to “The Great Gatsby,” calling it “a classic American story"

Posted by: , at March 16, 2010 1:55 PM

I love this book. It's really one of my all-time favorites, and I say that as a person who a) attended exactly 1 1/2 years of college and b) someone who has never had a considerable amount of time spent 'loafing.' I tend to read the book about once a year.

Posted by: Sara at March 16, 2010 2:03 PM

(And on a side note, I thought the movie version was just ok. Not spectacular, but not horrible. Knowing that Michael Chabon was ok with the adaptation probably made me more forgiving, even though they changed a fair amount.)

Posted by: Sara at March 16, 2010 2:05 PM

I thought Kavalier & Clay was phenomenal; it's a gorgeous epic American novel. I loved the Yiddish Policemen's Union, and Gentlemen of the Road was fun. I also loved his book of essays, Maps & Legends.

That said, I'm not that interested in the reviewed novel. Having read his essay about writing it, I am not excited to read a coming-of-age novel by a grad student (as Lemon says, they're the worst).

Posted by: Brenton at March 16, 2010 7:53 PM

Pajiba really needs some new book reviewers. This one is painfully amateur, especially the first paragraph. Stop clearing your damn throat and WRITE dammit.

Posted by: Abby at March 17, 2010 4:41 PM

Abby, please see "Cannonball Read" to understand why your statement is at least partially ridiculous:

http://www.pajiba.com/2009-2010-cannonball-read-participants.php

The reason they seem amateur is because... wait for it... they are! Unpaid bloggers read and review 52 books in one year. Their reviews are then posted here.

Posted by: Brenton at March 22, 2010 7:26 PM