web
counter
 

Cannonball Read III: The Colour of Magic by Terry Pratchett

By FyreHaar | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (24)



colour_of_magic.jpg

The Colour of Magic is the first Discworld novel. It is a send up of fantasy, a genre ripe for mocking. The heroes are a wizard who failed out of magic school and a tourist from the other side of the world, which is a disc that rests on the back of four elephants who are riding on a celestial turtle.

Rincewind, the wizard, is tasked with showing Twoflower, the tourist, around the continent. Twoflower is the first tourist from his side of the world to visit the main continent. He is extremely naive as to the culture on the continent he is visiting. Most of the hijinks that ensue do so because of his ignorance and Pollyannaish nature.

Absurdism abounds and is quite diverting. Eventually it became distracting. The satire is forced and relies heavily on puns. The tourist, Twoflower, brings modern day concepts into the story, but they are sometimes hidden behind impenetrable veils of punnery. It just broke the frame. In the end, the point was the absurdism rather than the plot, which in the end meant absolutely nothing. Definitely not escapist fantasy. This book was so self aware that it is hard to get into.


For more of FyreHaar’s reviews, check out her blog, Fire & Sonic.

This review is part of Cannonball Read III. For more information, click here.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Justin Timberlake's Brilliantly Meta Rehearsal Sketch from "Saturday Night Live" | "The Transporter" Television Series Updates









Comments

This article is a stub. Please help by adding to it and expanding it.

Posted by: Craig at May 23, 2011 10:18 AM

I find Pratchett a bit twee for my tastes as well -- but Good Omens, his collaboration with Neil Gaiman, was absolutely brilliant -- it was the best parts of both authors, and hands down one of my favorite books.

Posted by: linny at May 23, 2011 11:06 AM

Almost anything Gaiman contributes to becomes so, to the point of wondering how much, ever, is the other and how much is Gaiman. But, maybe he's like BASF

Posted by: Protoguy at May 23, 2011 12:03 PM

No, Protoguy. You don't understand the mechanics of Good Omens at all. You need to read it, and then read a few Discworld novels. Terry Pratchett's hand is extremely dominant in Good Omens.

That said: Colour of Magic is his first Discworld, and it's not so much a novel as an anthology of short stories about the same guy. Also, it's not entirely satire. Discworld is a fantasy series. What he tends to satirize are the "establishments" in fantasy, the human conceptions forced onto a wild, magical world. And yes, it is rough, as were most of his previous novels. But its still a good read if you can let your preconceptions go.

Also, I agree with Craig. This review is too short and doesn't to the seminal work of a best-selling series justice.

Posted by: Kat at May 23, 2011 12:24 PM

@Kat & Craig-

This length of the review is reflective of my experience of the book (and my incredibly poor writing skills). I was not inspired to write more because the book in no way inspired me.

I've heard from a lot of friends about how much they love Pratchett. After reading this book I figured that either I was missing the point, his later works are better, or I know a lot of people with bad taste in books.

-fh

Posted by: FyreHaar at May 23, 2011 12:30 PM

FyreHaar: I would say a little of Column A and Column B, and none at all of Column C. Terry Pratchett is one of the best sci-fi/fantasy writers on the planet, at the moment, and a lot of that is precisely because he's largely a satirist. It makes all of the melodrama endemic to fantasy more palatable to a certain kind of thinker.

Also, as a book reviewer, I'd like to suggest that you need to find stuff to write about, and the fact that it is, in fact, a series of short stories might have been reason to add at least another paragraph sketching out the types of adventures or themes discussed.

Posted by: Kat at May 23, 2011 12:45 PM

I recently (finally) read Good Omens and loved it and have been thinking about giving the discworld series a try. I'm still not sure based on this review, so any comments to the contrary would be great.

My two cents--lay off the length of the review, 52 books in a year is hard enough as it is.

Posted by: maceo at May 23, 2011 12:50 PM

maceo: Start with Small Gods. It's a mostly standalone novel, and while it has a lot of self-references, it pretty much encapsulates the Discworld sensibilities. Either you find it a funny-yet-thoughtful treatise on religion, or you think its stupid.

Also, please understand: Discworld is one of the largest, most popular adult fantasy series in the Western world. Dismissively reviewing the pilot in a couple of paragraphs is akin to reading the first Hitchhiker's book and writing "Pfft. People in a space ship? Whatevs." There is going to be some backlash from people who grew up with Terry Pratchett informing their world views.

Posted by: Kat at May 23, 2011 12:54 PM

you really shouldn't review a book, if you cant write more than a back-sleeve summary... honestly.

i've been waiting so long for this site to do a pratchett review and this really did disappoint.

if you had such a terrible experience with the book, maybe forgo "reviewing" it, and find something that inspires you to write more than 2 short paragraphs.

Posted by: sara at May 23, 2011 1:00 PM

Also "Very interesting Things" by pratchett is one of the funniest things i've EVER read...and "Equal Rites" is one bad-ass feminist story...anyone new to the Pratchett should try them out.

Posted by: sara at May 23, 2011 1:06 PM

Maceo, I started reviewing in October, and I have 27 reviews completed and submitted, and a couple of those are for entire book series. I also have nine books I've finished reading on deck. And I work a real job, because I don't get paid for the reviews (though the free books are rad). I'm not saying everyone has to live up to that standard, but no, I'm not going to cut her slack for sheer numbers. Sometimes you have to dig deep, but there has to be more there to show respect for the author.

I mean, sheeyit, Twilight was terrible, and people took up tens of pages at a time detailing how terrible it was.

Posted by: maceo at May 23, 2011 1:09 PM

When it comes to Discworld, I think you should start at the beginning and go from there. The reason is that he gets better as he goes along. The Light Fantastic is an improvement, Equal Rites is better still, and with Mort he finally gets his feet under him and starts off. It continues to improve until about Reaper Man, at which point the series shoots up in quality and stays there.

Posted by: Shadowen at May 23, 2011 1:27 PM

@ Sara - this is not a Pajiba review, it's a Cannonball Read review and thus should not be judged by the standards usually applied to Pajiba content.
I do the Cannonball to force myself to write so I can develop my skills. I appreciate the suggestions for improving my technique.

@maceo (who was writing to maceo so I don't think that's maceo) I'm glad that you both read and write more quickly than I read and write. I had my review of the Twilight series posted from last year's Cannonball. I wrote more about it because it was so ghastly that it inspired me to write about it. The Color of Magic left me feeling meh.

Posted by: FyreHaar at May 23, 2011 2:18 PM

A couple of things folks:

First, FyreHaar is not "a book reviewer," she's a Cannonball Read III participant, which means she's participating in a good cause, but did not sign up to review books in any sort of professional capacity.

Second, CBR reviews are only required to be a minimum of three paragraphs, which this is.

Third, she was not reviewing the whole series, merely the first book.

Fourth, CBR participants don't pick which of their reviews are selected to be posted to Pajiba. I do that. I picked this because I was hoping it might generate a good discussion, where folks who liked the book would jump in and explain why they liked it. Perhaps without disparaging the author of the review (see my first point). Of course everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion.

Fifth, this is not the first Pratchett review posted on Pajiba. Perhaps you missed this one. Also, Good Omens has been reviewed twice. You can find both of those reviews under the Book Reviews Archive.

Sixth, sadly, it's a good day when a CBR review gets 5 comments. Given that this one has at least 12, I putting this one in the "win" column.

Now please carry on with your comments of what you liked about this book/series and Terry Pratchett in general. And maybe show up to some other CBR reviews to make helpful comments. The Cannonblallers are fabulous for simply signing up for the shindig in the first place and agreeing to not only read a bunch of books, but review them, and take the chance that I might grab one of their reviews randomly to throw up here, whether they like it or not. --TU

Posted by: tamatha at May 23, 2011 2:43 PM

Agreed with the sentiments that Colour of Magic is not really representative of the Discworld series as a whole. It's really a pity that the first one is not great, since that's where most people start (obviously) and I wouldn't be surprised if it put more people off than anything else. Also echoing that Mort (#4) was more or less where Pratchett found his style and Reaper Man (#11) has most of the characters more or less established. I would also recommend reading not necessarily in the exact published order, but reading each of the various 'strands' - there are books based on the Watch, the Witches, Rincewind, Death and various stand alone books, which are almost like several different series that happen to share a universe. My personal favourite is the Watch which starts with Guards! Guards!, but they're all good.

TL;DR version: in spite of what Maria von Trapp says, in this case the beginning is not a very good place to start.

Posted by: Aston at May 23, 2011 3:48 PM

Yay Terry Pratchett!!!

I'm a recent Discworld-obsessive (thanks to Pajiban recs on FB late one night). I've been hopping a bit out of order . . . I started with Mort, then made my way through all the books dealing with the City Watch. I recently went back to the top of the list and started with Colour of Magic and I'm now on Eric Faust.

Colour of Magic was a bit of a letdown after reading further in the series, but it's easy to see that Pratchett is getting his legs under him, and it does provide a handy bit of history for Rincewind, as he pops up a lot in other books.

People have said it, and I repeat it here . . . just wait until you meet Granny Weatherwax and Sam Vimes. Two of my favorite characters in any series, hands down.

Also, I highly recommend Monstrous Regiment as a good standalone. It only barely touches on other characters, but was a good read (I may have vaguely sniffled through a couple parts).

Posted by: MyySharona at May 23, 2011 5:29 PM

Dammit, Faust was supposed to have a strikethrough. I've been proofreading for the past 7 hours, so this is going to bother me until I post a second comment with a correction.

Posted by: MyySharona at May 23, 2011 5:31 PM

The first couple of books in the Discworld series are fairly dismal, almost shockingly so if you've read his later books first and gone back to see what you've missed. It took Terry Pratchett three or four books to really hit his stride, but I don't think anyone else can compare to his humorous-but-affectionate observations on the quirks and foibles of human nature. He's just as cynical as Douglas Adams, but a good deal more warmhearted about it.

Posted by: Craig at May 23, 2011 6:52 PM

I always like to read a review about Pratchett's work because of the personal pride I feel at having stuck with his work for years. Yeah, irrational. It's nice to see the communal joy for his work!

It's a shame he's not everyone's cup of tea. I understand FyreHaar's (damn, I love that name!) shrug off of Colour of Magic. But girl, if you ever get around to reading any of his others, I hope it's one with Nanny Ogg. When she's drunk and launching into "that" song! Some characters are more fully fleshed out than others, but you've got to have room in your heart for Nanny Ogg and Granny Weatherwax! And Death, where there's no flesh at all!
Ok. I'm done! I'm done!

Posted by: Four Eyes at May 23, 2011 6:52 PM

I've heard from a lot of friends about how much they love Pratchett. After reading this book I figured that either I was missing the point, his later works are better, or I know a lot of people with bad taste in books

His later works are better. The Colour of Magic and The Light Fantastic are epically dull compared to later novels.

For Pajiba readers, I'd recommend starting with either "Wyrd Sisters" (Macbeth with laughs) or "Moving Pictures" (Movies, Hollywood and Cthulhu).

Posted by: Ballytmena Bob at May 23, 2011 7:30 PM

Long-time lurker here, I'd just like to add to the noise - I love Terry Pratchett; I hate The Colour of Magic.

I can completely sympathise with what appears to be a let down for you of sorts, FyreHaare. The Discworld book you elected to read is really not representative of the excellent stride Pratchett hits later on.

If you're ever curious to try again (and hopefully, really get what the fuss is about), I'd recommend, in no particular order:

- Wyrd Systers
- Night Watch
- Thud
- The Fifth Elephant
- Carpe Jugulum
- Lords and Ladies
- Witches Abroad
- Maskerade

I've probably had my perception coloured by the audiobooks I've listened to narrated by Stephen Briggs (a collaborator of Pratchett's). They're simply astounding and I think actually lend a lot of richness to the books which I find missing upon physical rereads. If you have some menial tasks you want a bit of accompaniment to, Audible has them available.

Posted by: Saucin' at May 23, 2011 10:55 PM

Thanks Kat, I've kinda stayed away from Pratchett for some reason. I do like Gaiman though. I'm willing to give Terry a try and Omens does sound like a good way to do so.

Posted by: Protoguy at May 24, 2011 2:45 AM

@Saucin' and others. Thanks for the suggestions! I guess my need to read a book series in order sort of bit me in the ass here.

Posted by: FyreHaar at May 24, 2011 11:29 AM

FyreHaar, I'm all for reading things in order (normally) but a series as long as this one needs some patience with it, I think.

Posted by: MyySharona at May 24, 2011 5:18 PM