web
counter
 

Cannonball Read IV: Tess of the D’Urbervilles by Thomas Hardy

By Jelinas | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (15)



Strawberry

Another year, another Cannonball. CBR-IV is on like Donkey Kong.

Ahh, there’s nothing quite like a depressing tale of ruin and social stigma to kick off the New Year.

I’d heard the title of this book many times growing up, but had never actually heard what it was about. Then, right before I started reading it, a friend told me that it was just really depressing. I enjoy a good, sad book (Of Mice and Men, anyone?), so I decided to plunge in.

Tess of the D’Urbervilles taught me that there is a big difference between good sad and bad sad. Good sad has some redemption involved that kinda makes the sadness worthwhile. Bad sad is just depressing, and even if there’s a little redemption or at least some social value, it doesn’t really make it worth how depressing the story is.

Tess Durbeyfield is a simple peasant girl who lives a simple peasant life until, one day, her alcoholic father hears from a parson that the Durbeyfields are likely the descendants of the D’Urbervilles, a noble family fallen into ruin and obscurity. Hearing that there might be some distant (and wealthy) relatives living nearby, John Durbeyfield determines that he and his family ought to get a piece of that pie and sends his pretty daughter Tess to go and collect.

What was supposed to be a golden opportunity for Tess ends up leading to her ruin (you can probably guess how. I mean, it’s a book about social stigma back in old-timey England. You do the math).

It was a scandalous book for its time. It involves a taboo subject, and, at the time, probably shed some light and helped people to reconsider the justice of how “ruined” women were treated. Because of this, it’s also an important work.

But, man, it’s a sad book. Poor Tess never meets a man who does right by her, from her father to her would-be noble relative, to the love of her life, to her employer. The only man in the entire book who shows her the least kindness is an old dairyman. This book isn’t really sad in a way that makes you think of noble things and want to be a better person. It makes you think of injustice and makes you despair of ever living in a world free of it.

In that way, I suppose it’s almost as important as Native Son, which was probably the best book I read in 2011. But I think Bigger Thomas was a more realistic character than Tess Durbeyfield, whose blind devotion to the man of her dreams and patience under unjust suffering make her seem rather two-dimensional to me. The way Wright wrote made me want to stand up against injustice, whereas Hardy’s book made me want to buckle under the weight of it.

I can appreciate Tess for its literary achievement, and acknowledge its social and historical importance. But I can’t say that I enjoyed reading it, or that reading it really did me any good.

And, for what it’s worth, this is the Tom Hardy I prefer to come to mind when I hear that name in the future:

Tom Hardy.

For more of Jelinas’ reviews, check out her blog, Book Bloggy Blog.

This review is part of Cannonball Read IV. Read all about it.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba Love Up All Night | Rumors Of The Fantastic Four Film Franchise's Demise Have (Unfortunately) Been Greatly Exaggerated









Comments

I've never read this but it's one of those books I feel like I should read, even though I had no idea what it was about. I think I'll pick it up, though, and try and imagine Tom Hardy the whole time to ward off the depression.

Posted by: baxlala at January 17, 2012 9:47 AM

I HATE Tom Hardy (the author; the actor, I adore). Between this book, and Jude the Obscure, I would never recommend him to anyone. I actually think I threw the latter across the room when I finished reading it. It's like you said: there's good sad and bad sad. His books have no point other than to torture his protagonist as much as possible. Yes, he points out some social injustices, but even if you took those away, there is no moral other than "Life's shit and then you die." Which, okay fine, I guess that's a point of view. But it's not the type of story I enjoy, or think is even worthwhile.

I love Native Son; it's probably my favorite book. I also love Things Fall Apart. And Tom Hardy, actor.

Posted by: Kristobel at January 17, 2012 10:12 AM

Tess was one of the most unsympathetic literary characters I've ever had the misfortune to experience. She, Anna Karenina, and Hester Prynne mademe just want to scream. I guress I just find noble self sacrifice (I'm the case of Hester and Tess at least) tiresome.

Posted by: Nyltiak at January 17, 2012 10:19 AM

Oh, I love Thomas Hardy. One of my favorite Victorian writers. Yeah, the plots are a little heavy with the melodrama and tragedy. You know Hardy is going to give you mores and moors: conflict rooted in rigid social constraints of the time against the backdrop of lush English countryside. You get intelligent and passionate female characters who are ultimately ineffectual and destroyed by their own desires, the evil of men, and the aforementioned restrictive social structures of the times. It's like Mad Men. It's like every good song by The Decmberists. Everybody is focusing on the plot but that's only the very beginning.

I love the writing. The guy can put the words together. He can weave in an obvious love for nature and naturalism and evoke the setting better than most. He can embrace what were rather forward-thinking ideas at the time of social justice, freedom, equality, and self-determination (by showing the tragedy and injustice resulting from their absence). He was subversive, critical of power, authority, and religion, he was a passionate humanist and lover of nature. It all comes through in the prose.

Whenever that brutish looking actor bloke is in some new film it always reminds me of good literature, which is nice.

Posted by: Yossarian at January 17, 2012 10:58 AM

I commend your stamina. I started reading Tess of the D'ubervilles last fall and I couldn't finish it. I just hit that point where I could finally see the horrible things that were about to happen to Tess and I knew that if I didn't stop I'd have to find a way to go back in time to kick Tom Hardy in the balls or possibly set him on fire.

So thank you modern literature for ripping off older story structure thereby allowing me to see the bad stuff coming. Your lack of imagination saved me a whole lot of ire.

Ugh, I hate the past. People were such dicks back then.

Posted by: Lipton at January 17, 2012 11:11 AM

I actually like Hardy's writing. In the vein of bad sad I see your Hardy's Tess and raise you Eliot's The Mill on the Floss. Now THAT'S a book that just pisses me off with its posturing, and silliness and ultimate life is sad, etc, etc. and no where near as adeptly as Hardy.

Posted by: Andrew K. at January 17, 2012 12:06 PM

I'm with you Yossarian. I tried to say it in my own words but i just wrote a couple of incoherent paragraphes that added nothing. I just want to chime in with my support for this novel.

Also I love the Mad Men comparison. Such dispicably human characters...I guess if they weren't all being awful to Tess we'd be able to sympathise more with their weaknesses.

There was a good adaptation recently...I think it was BBC. Gemma Arterton (if that's her name?) was Tess. I HATED Angel in this one but Alec was portrayed almost sympathetically.

Posted by: Sarah at January 17, 2012 12:33 PM

I had to read Tess during my first year of English Lit, during the tragedy course we did, and it still ranks as among the most depressing books I've ever read. I get that she's a victim of her time and all, but Tess is such a DOORMAT, you can't even care that all these awful awful things are happening to her, because she does NOTHING to fight back. Not one single solitary thing, she just keeps taking it, miserably. Must admit, I've never been even vaguely tempted to read any more Hardy.

Posted by: Malin at January 17, 2012 12:58 PM

Read both Tess of D'Urbervilles and Jude the Obscure (which is even more depressing than Tess, if that's possible) in high school English. Hated both books and have never opened another book by Hardy since.

spoiler below








Am I the only one who think the ending of Tess is creepy? Tess is giving her younger sister, who is a younger socially acceptable (i.e. not raped) clone of herself, to Angel as a replacement.

Posted by: True_Blue at January 17, 2012 1:49 PM

I am glad to see that I'm not alone in this opinion. I had to read this for AP English as a senior in high school and it was one of the most miserable literary experiences of my life. I am not sure how I got through the whole thing because it is so unforgivably, infuriatingly unfair and sad. It is less a call to arms than a call to lay down and die.

In conclusion, fuck Tess of the D'Urbervilles.

Posted by: Colin at January 17, 2012 3:44 PM

Everything Yossarian said. I read Tess when I was sixteen and loved it.

Posted by: caragwapa at January 17, 2012 10:29 PM

I also read this in AP English my senior year of HS & I HATED it. And not just because I was an obnoxious 17 year old. I get that the world was different then & that women were no more than pawns but reading it was one of the worst literary experiences of my life. It is only book that I have ever used Cliff Notes for. I could not bring myself to read the last 60 pages.

The only book I hate with the same fury is The Awakening. And bet that will be a different review

Posted by: Bodhi at January 18, 2012 2:59 AM

Sorry to be so late to the party. Been out all day helping two brides whose weddings I'm standing in later this year. WHEW.

baxlala: The image of Tom Hardy does help to take the edge off Thomas Hardy. I highly recommend keeping that JPG handy while reading Hardy so that, when things get too hard to read, you can take a Hardy break.

Kristobel: I love that you and I love some of the same books and Tom Hardy. Woot.

Nyltiak: I also totally hate Anna Karenina (as a character -- I thought the book was mostly well-written. I actually had my review for Anna Karenina posted on Pajiba during CBR-II) and Hester Prynne. Word.

Yoss: I never said I didn't enjoy Hardy's writing. I agree that the dude knows how to cobble a sentence. But it's hard to relish the description of an idyllic pastoral landscape when you're weighed down by the oppression of an entire society.

Lipton: Thanks for the props. It helped that it was the first book I ever read on the new Kindle I got for Christmas. The novelty of my toy kept me excited enough to keep reading. Also, I read a lot of it whilst waiting for my sister in between wedding dress fittings (she's one of the aforementioned brides). As long as it takes to get in and out of a wedding dress, I was able to finish Tess in less than a week.

Andrew K.: Thanks for the warning about The Mill on the Floss. I need at least a little break before I dive back into bad sad again.

Sarah: You wrote: "I guess if they weren't all being awful to Tess we'd be able to sympathise more with their weaknesses."

But that's kind of my point. All of the characters were being awful to Tess; there wasn't a redeeming thing about a one of them. That's why the book read so 2-D to me.

Malin: I agree. Again, Tess' inability to even bemoan her bad luck or try to start over made her a really flat character to me.

True_Blue (and SPOILER ALERT): I'm totally with you on the creepiness. Also, who decides that it's a good idea to ookhay upyay erhay oungeryay istersay ithway ethay anmay owhay abandonedyay erhay? "Umyay, ehay idday ongwray ybay emay, utbay aybemay e'llhay oday ayay etterbay objay ithway ouyay. Otnay atthay I'llyay ebay aroundyay otay akemay uresay atthay ehay oesday."

Colin: You wrote: "It is less a call to arms than a call to lay down and die."

This is exactly what I see as the difference between Tess and Native Son.

caragwapa: Well, I'm glad you enjoyed Tess. If it doesn't sap the will to live out of you, then you're a stronger person than I.

Bodhi: Ahh, The Awakening. But I have to say that my least favorite book of all high school and college was Heart of Darkness. I had to read it at least three or four times in different classes and, by the time I graduated, I wanted to shred and then burn it.

Posted by: Jelinas at January 18, 2012 3:51 AM

The trick with The Mill on the Floss is to just stop reading it halfway through. Maggie Tulliver is much less boring and insufferable as a child.

I read Tess in high school (so it's been several years), but I do actually remember really liking it at the time, despite the fact that Tess just CANNOT win. (At anything. Ever.) It is a giant downer of a book, no question. Then again, I was a teenager at the time, so maybe I just liked being able to unload all of my pent-up vitriol at Angel Clare and Alex D'urberville during class discussion.

I actually recommended Tess to a friend not too long ago -- warning her, as I did so, that it is one of the most depressing books I'd ever read -- and she ended up throwing it across the room in frustration before she'd even made it halfway through the novel. She almost didn't trust my judgement enough to pick up Jane Eyre afterward.

Posted by: [ . . . ] at January 18, 2012 9:14 PM

I have to confess, [ . . . ], that I actually hated Jane Eyre. I know I'm in the minority on this one, but the Brontë sisters are just too melodramatic for me. I just can't stop rolling my eyes at them.

Posted by: Jelinas at January 20, 2012 10:58 AM