web
counter
 

Lovely Bones by Alice Sebold

By Sophia | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (22)



lovely_bones.jpg

I can’t just ignore a couple of book recommendations for the same novel, especially when they come from disparate sources. The Lovely Bones (2002) by Alice Sebold was on a number of reading lists and kept making itself known to me until I could ignore it no longer. I really liked many things about this book; it only kind of lost me near the end. In order for me to really discuss this novel, though, I think I’ll have to bring up some happenings near the back of the book. Please consider this a warning that there might be some spoilers ahead.

Susie Salmon, the narrator of Sebold’s novel, is 14 years old and she’s just been brutally raped and murdered by her neighbor. She watches as her family reacts to her disappearance and assumed death, she watches the police wander past clues and suspects, and she watches her father talk with her killer. At first, I was a little leery of a story that began with the rape and murder of a young, white girl near her home. The sensationalist take on these cases is inevitably over-the-top and incredibly annoying. If this book garnered interest in the same way that Nancy Grace does, then I wanted no part. Fortunately, Sebold, for the most part, bypasses the exploitative nature of these cases by using Susie as her storyteller. Although the tragic occurrences in her life are still moving and sad, hearing it all from Susie means that she’s not completely gone, that things can get better.

After her death, Susie finds herself in a heaven-like place where she can watch over her family. There are others with her, but everyone has their own version of heaven, comprised of what they know and wish for, so there are many different versions and Susie only sees her own. She is still desperately attached to her family and watches as they struggle with the reality of her fate. Four-year-old Buckley doesn’t understand what’s going on, but Susie’s sister struggles with her own grief as well as growing up as the poor sibling of a “murdered sister.” Susie’s parents also fight through their grief, and some problems inherent in their relationship come to a climax under the stress.

The combination of suspense and the sensitive portrayal of a family in crisis was incredibly interesting. The characters felt real and likable, and Susie herself kept the book surprisingly light given the topic. As Susie describes what might have been her first kiss, she says, “[i]f I had known this was to be the sex scene of my life, I might have prepared a bit, reapplied my Strawberry-Banana Kissing Potion as I came in the door.” Lindsey, Susie’s sister, is strong and independent and somehow manages to continue living, despite her grief and challenges.

While Susie is discovering heaven, watching over her grieving family, and wanting her killer to be caught, I was hooked. But once the living discovered the identity of Susie’s killer, the pace of the book slowed down and I started feeling a little lost. And then the end of the book came out of nowhere. Susie changes places with the body of a friend of hers, one who somehow has had the power to sense the dead and wanted to switch with her. Susie uses her limited hours back on Earth to have sex with her middle school crush, and then she goes back to heaven. Then, from heaven, Susie makes an icicle fall into the chest of her murderer, killing him, before he can kill again.

I can appreciate the bittersweetness: that a girl who was ripped from the Earth, only knowing brutality, and never making love, would have the chance to go back and experience it. But Susie comes back for only a couple of hours and she sleeps with her middle school crush? Is that really the best use of her time? I like the idea that she would choose love over vengeance, but she had just been watching as her killer stalked her sister. He’s out there, he’s a danger, and she knew where he was. And what about her family? I guess I also found the whole “coming back to Earth” plot point hard to believe. From my perspective, Sebold’s world wouldn’t allow for that, and I couldn’t imagine her old boyfriend suddenly believing that Susie had come back from the dead and was inhabiting her friend’s body. The whole falling icicle thing was also a little hard for me to believe, and it was a little too convenient. I did like this book; I was impressed how Sebold could twist a horrible murder into an often funny and touching story, but I did have some problems near the end.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. For more of Sophia’s reviews, check out her blog, My Life As Seen Through Books.









Remaking Your Favorite Classic Movie | Charlize Theron Atlas Shrugged













Comments

I read this book and enjoyed it as well; but I have to say that Sebold's memoir Lucky is far superior.

Posted by: beegeek at July 22, 2009 8:36 AM

This book lost me halfway through. I just stopped liking the family, especially the mother.

Posted by: Wednesday at July 22, 2009 8:54 AM

I had the same problems with this book. The first two thirds are surprisingly beautiful and the victim-as-first-person-narrator conceit worked well for me. As soon as the rules set up by that conceit began to be broken and Susie comes back to earth as a possessing spirit (or whatever), the book just began loosing me and it was all I could do to finish the unravelling, cornball mess that is the novel's final third.

Posted by: Armando at July 22, 2009 9:04 AM

It's been quite some time since I read this book, although I do remember liking it very much and finding it very moving. I think I found the ending quite muddled too, especially the bit with the icicle. I think I wanted the murderer to pay more for what he had done, and for everyone to know it was him. Instead he was bumped off and that was that.

I read her memoir, Lucky, which was also very good, but her latest book, The Almost Moon, went unfinished. I found it basically unreadable.

Posted by: Carrie at July 22, 2009 9:17 AM

Never read The Almost Moon. No matter if you adore The Lovely Bones (as I did) or enjoyed Lucky (as I did, to a lesser extent), just heed the warning and never pick up that boring, depressing book.

Posted by: becks at July 22, 2009 9:41 AM

MORE SPOILERS*******
I think the return to earth was a little contrived, but it definitely followed through on Susie's main complaint about being killed so young: missing out on sex and romantic love. Sebold strongly suggests that a life without sexual intimacy is a life unfulfilled. It's a little naive and immature but definitely fits a 14 year old's mindset. I would personally inhabit a body and go around hugging my loved ones one last time, regardless if they knew it was me. Susie got her chance to experience sex and followed through. Good for her.

Also, I didn't mind Susie personally taking revenge since she was tortured by watching the killer go unpunished for years. It wasn't very original, but I want to chalk it up to a nod to the narrator being 14 more than Sebold's inability to finish a story with more imagination. If another book of hers is as unimaginative, well, I will be Kballs' moderate disappointment.

Posted by: Kballs at July 22, 2009 9:45 AM

Talking about the movie adaptation for a second, I always pictured Sam Rockwell as the dad, someone like Catherine Keener as the mom, and Tom Wilkinson as the killer.

I don't see the current casting in the roles at all...Mark Wahlberg as the dad, Rachel Weisz as the mom, and Stanley Tucci as the killer.

Did they just random names out of a hat?

Posted by: Groovekiller at July 22, 2009 10:40 AM

I agree with Kballs. Though the ending seemd a little cornbally and frankly absurd (going back to earth to bone your boyfriend?) it does play true to what a typical 14 year-old might think and do. In that regard, the author was faithful to his narrator.

Posted by: courtney at July 22, 2009 11:00 AM

"I read this book and enjoyed it as well; but I have to say that Sebold's memoir Lucky is far superior."

Absolutely. I was actually pleasantly surprised by "Lucky" - I thought it was well-written, poignant, and brutally, brutally honest. I thought TLB would be terrible, but it really wasn't. Detested the coming-back-to-earth thing, as well. The book suffered from it.

Posted by: samantha t at July 22, 2009 11:03 AM

Stanley Tucci as the killer? That doesn't fit my mental picture in the slightest.

I read the book when it came out but completely forgot the end, apparently I blocked it out my memory so I could remember the beginning and not hate it for going so far down hill.

Posted by: eden at July 22, 2009 11:12 AM

"Stanley Tucci as the killer? That doesn't fit my mental picture in the slightest."

I don't know - I don't think it's so off. I think Weisz as the mother is a bit off.

Posted by: samantha t at July 22, 2009 11:14 AM

Wow, finally a book in Cannonball Read that I have actually read! I liked it, my folks liked it, I continue to lend it out.
I am deeply suspicious of this movie adaptation, but I will give it the benefit of a doubt.
My casting:

Phillip Seymour Hoffman for the killer.
Dude can really do creepy 'normal' guy. He looks like 'that guy that lives down the street who always waves but no one seems to know anything about.'

Laura Linney for the mom.
No good reason, I could just see her doing it.

That's all I got.

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at July 22, 2009 12:52 PM

I think I really need to re-read this. At least to understand better why I hated it so much. I remember being bored, and just angry at the characters, and just completely depressed by the whole thing. I just really didn't like it.

Posted by: figgy at July 22, 2009 1:25 PM

"Susie changes places with the body of a friend of hers, one who somehow has had the power to sense the dead and wanted to switch with her. Susie uses her limited hours back on Earth to have sex with her middle school crush, and then she goes back to heaven."

Holy Fuck. I read this years ago and don't remember this part at all. The icicle stayed with me, though.

Posted by: Kate at July 22, 2009 2:45 PM

i want to read this book

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at July 22, 2009 3:45 PM

total schmaltzy shit

Posted by: mal at July 22, 2009 4:11 PM

It's such a shame that Ryan Gosling was let go/quit the movie and Marky Mark took his place. Gosling would have been absolutely astonishing. So will Marky Mark of course, but for a whole different set of reasons.

And say what you will about this book (and it's not perfect by any means) but the scene where the dad uses Monopoly to explain Susie's death to her younger brother absolutely DESTROYED me! I've explained that scene to about four different people recently and I've started crying every time. It's just wrenching.

Posted by: Popcultureboy at July 22, 2009 4:23 PM

I read this book a few years ago and remember really liking it though the memories are fuzzy. And yeah, I too blocked out the entire ending. But I do remember really feeling for the family, especially the dad, since he knew the truth in his gut and no one would believe him. It slayed me. But I agree, I usually have a really hard time with any stories dealing with rape and murder, but I loved the way the author dealt with it, making it just removed enough to get me through it, but not losing the tragic elements of the story throughout.

It's one of the reasons I could only get through one chapter of "Running with Scissors". Do I really need to know what it feels like to get raped in the mouth, in graphic detail, across several pages? No, thank you.

Posted by: BMG at July 22, 2009 6:23 PM

Once again, figgy and I are brainfoot twins. Except I'm perfectly content with never re-reading this to better understand why I hated it.

Posted by: SaBrina at July 22, 2009 7:37 PM

I'm with Kate; I read the book a few years ago, then went back and re-read it when I heard about the movie adaptation, and while I had a good enough recollection of most of the book, the "Susie returns to Earth" chapter had completely gone from my mind (probably because, as most people have said, it didn't really fit or work that well). I did love the book for the most part though; even with the random possession twist, it still holds up pretty well.

Posted by: Shay at July 22, 2009 8:08 PM

This book made me cry. Like others, I seem to have blocked the part about Susie going back and having sex out of my mind. Although that plot point sounds quite silly, from what I do remember it seemed to jibe with Susie's personality. I really liked how Sebold portrayed the family though. I also think knowing a bit about Sebold's backstory (Sebold was raped) probably affected how moved I was while I read The Lovely Bones. I think I'm a more objective, less schmaltzy reader the less I know about the author.

Posted by: Mik at July 23, 2009 10:44 AM

I think Alice Sebold's REAL LIFE rape was a hoax. I can feel it in my bones people. Sebold is hoaxing everyone.

Posted by: Missy at September 20, 2009 2:17 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time