web
counter
 

Junky by William S. Burroughs

By Dropout! | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (12)



6a00d8341c8a8c53.jpg

“I drink a lot of coffee, but you know what’s really addictive? Heroin.”

This is frustrating. Junky was definitely holding my interest, in a sort of sociological way, teaching me about The Way of the Junky. Then, halfway through, I idly read the back cover and discovered that it wasn’t an autobiography, like I had thought, but a novel. I tried to pretend I never gained that information. After all, I knew it still had elements of reality in it, from Burroughs’ life as an actual gay heroin addict. But I couldn’t get past that, and I had to force myself to finish. It didn’t help that he started repeating himself, either; his descriptions of junk sickness, and the usual timelines for becoming addicted or getting off junk, were taken almost word for word from the beginning and plonked in again. The whole plot, too, was just more of the same “Now I’m doing junk in this different place, and this different junky informed on some other junky to the police, and some other junky died, and I tried more drugs, and I quit junk, and I went back, and junk is sooooo good, so nice and fresh, and junk junk junk.” I get it, Billy, the guy likes heroin.

But just now, I found out that it was autobiographical, or at least partly. He had it published under the name William Lee, which I assume I would’ve known if I had bothered to read the introduction, but I did not bother, and thus I became immensely confused when he was referred to as “Mr. Lee.” I don’t know if I would’ve stayed more engaged despite my problems with it if I had known this going in. Perhaps.

And what was up with his wife? First of all, the guy’s not ambiguously gay. Why is he marrying chicks? And second, why is she only mentioned once or twice? “So then my wife, who I have never mentioned before, bailed me out of jail, and went home and knitted potholders for fifty pages, apparently, because she sure wasn’t doing anything worth writing about.” Except I did some ‘net investigatin’, and Burroughs fucking shot his wife in the head and killed her! That is crazy.

On the bright side, I am now 100% certain that I am never going to do heroin. Ever. Or play drunken William Tell. Peyote doesn’t sound too good, either. Shit, he even managed to make drinking tequila sound like a nightmarish journey through an unrelenting hellscape.

Parting words of wisdom, courtesy of Mr. Lee: “Who wants kids for customers? They never have enough money and they always spill under questioning.”

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. For more of Dropout!’s reviews, check out her blog, Beauty School Dropout.










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba After Dark 2/15/10 | Pajiba After Dark 2/15/10









Comments

Kudos to you for reading Burroughs. I have a friend who went insane after reading "Naked Lunch." From what I hear, that one's semiautobiographical too. Guy liked to talk about his addictions, I guess.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at February 15, 2010 7:56 PM

"Nightmarish journey through an unrelenting hellscape" is a great phrase.

This is a great day! I wish we could do more non-stop review days.

Posted by: vikky at February 15, 2010 8:36 PM

This really confuses me. So he shot his wife in the head? Why isn't he in jail?

Posted by: dene at February 15, 2010 9:14 PM

Dropout dude, why did you pick this book? If you want to just skip over the surfaces there are lots of other books - some even have sparkly vampires!(pure snark - I love books with vampires).

Oh and I can't imagine why a gay man might want to be married in the 1940s and '50s? Oh wait, maybe for the same reason as John Travolta today?

Posted by: amobogio at February 15, 2010 9:18 PM

It was interesting as a thinly veiled autobiography and the unapologetic, self-pity free tone was welcome. Had Burroughs couched it as a "learn fom my example" tale, the impact would have been diluted.
It captured the self absorbed arseholery of every junky I have ever met with absolute clarity. There was barely any acknowledgement of anyone else in his life besides his fellow 'enthusiasts', when he mentioned his wife two thirds of the way into the book, I thought he was concocting an alibi. Imagine my surprise a few pages later when she was introduced, albeit as little more than a sketch.

There's an adage about not meeting your heroes, at least Burroughs established up front that he wasn't one.

Posted by: Squirrelgripper at February 15, 2010 9:30 PM

OK i just read his wiki page (which I probably shoulda done before commenting) so now I know his life. but fun (more gruesome/random than fun) fact: Burroughs got in trouble with Jack Kerouac for failing to report a murder involving Lucien Carr, who had killed some guy. Lucien Carr is the father of Caleb Carr, who wrote The Alienist, and I was on his wiki page earlier today.

Posted by: dene at February 15, 2010 9:32 PM

I, for some reason, loved Naked Lunch when I read it in college. It took about three ridiculously intense readings of the novel with extensive note-taking (much of which consited of "??????") but I felt like I "got it" eventually and somehow managed to crank out a 20+ page paper dissecting it.

Quite the devoted nerd, me.

Posted by: Mattfactor at February 15, 2010 9:37 PM

Oh and I can't imagine why a gay man might want to be married in the 1940s and '50s? Oh wait, maybe for the same reason as John Travolta today?

Well, yeah, but I didn't get the impression that he had been trying to hide the fact that he was gay. Add that to his wife/wives never being mentioned, I was confused as hell.

About the surface thing: like I said, I liked the first half of it. It was absorbing, and opened up a new, previously alien world to me. It was only once I thought it was fiction that it lost me. Unless you mean the review, in which case, most of my reviews are unprofessional.

dene, that's really funny about the Carr coincidence.

Posted by: SaBrina (aka Dropout) at February 15, 2010 10:16 PM

Great review. I haven't read Junky, but read Naked Lunch in high school. From what I recall, the gay sex scenes are hot.

Posted by: Carmensandiego at February 15, 2010 11:23 PM

the cut-up technique.

yeah. that was awesome.

Posted by: jimmy at February 16, 2010 5:20 PM

with all due respect, was this review intentionally written so randomly? I feel as though I have no idea whether the book is good or not because this review was so oddly structured...

Posted by: mae at February 16, 2010 10:27 PM

I'm reading the book right now and like it a lot. It has a lot of insight on the cultural context of dope culture at the time. But I have to agree with you about the wife thing. Why was she barely mentioned? When he first mentions her it came as sort of a confused shock. It may have been that he was trying to convey the distance a junkie reaches with their significant others, but somehow I doubt it.

Posted by: SteveO at August 29, 2010 10:00 PM