web
counter
 

The Dull One

By Malin | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (16)



mansfield-park.jpg

Publisher’s Note: Congratulations to Malin, who joins Jen K. in the Cannonball Read Winner’s Circle.

Fanny Price, the eldest of nine siblings, is rescued from a life of relative poverty and drudgery when she is taken in by her wealthy relatives, Sir and Lady Bertram. At first she is terrified in the huge house with her well-meaning, but rather selfish and careless cousins, but her cousin Edmund (the younger of the two Bertram brothers) takes pity on her and shows her kindness and friendship. Thus starts the love Fanny feels for Edmund throughout the book.

Fanny is small and sickly, and even as she grows older, seems to tire and wear out faster than her livelier cousins. While she has the benefits of a good home and an education, she is always a bit outside the Bertram family, and her other aunt, Mrs Norris, never stops making her aware that she is lucky to be there on their sufferance. She becomes the helper and companion of the air-headed Lady Bertram, and puts up with a lot of fairly ill treatment with grace and forbearance.

While Sir Thomas Bertram and his eldest son are away in the West Indies, the young and handsome Crawford siblings arrive in the area, and shake things up considerably. The siblings are orphaned, good-looking and wealthy, and Henry Crawford, while a gentleman, is clearly a bit of a rake. Mary Crawford, his charming sister, has a fortune of nearly 20,000 pounds and feels drawn to Edmund, even though he is the younger son, and planning to become a clergyman. She makes an effort to befriend Fanny, and seems amused by her brother’s flirtation with both the Bertram sisters, even though Maria Bertram, the older, is engaged to another man.

Once Maria Bertram marries her rich, but ridiculous and silly suitor, and her younger sister Julia is hurt by Henry Crawford’s attentions to her sister, he sets out to make Fanny Price fall in love with him instead. This backfires, and he falls in love with her instead, finally offering for her. Fanny is appalled, having quietly watched as he toyed with her cousins, and as she’s in love with Edmund, refuses him multiple times. Edmund, however, only has eyes for the lively Miss Crawford.

Mansfield Park is probably the least popular of Jane Austen’s novels, and it is the only one I had never read before. I can see why it is known as “the dull one” and why many readers would have been a bit disappointed when this came out the year after Pride and Prejudice, as the novels really are extremely different. Pride and Prejudice was of course written many years before it was published, in a time when Austen was younger and more optimistic. But compared with the wit and sparkle and strong emotions of Pride and Prejudice, Mansfield Park fails to satisfy. Fanny Price is kind and self-sacrificing and a genuinely good person, but she’s also a bit of a drip. She seems to burst in to tears at the drop of a hat, and she would never dream of doing the wrong thing or saying something mean, even though her relatives, especially Mrs. Morris, often treat her badly. She just suffers on and loves Edmund from a distance.

Edmund Bertram is again a very good person, but not exactly a Mr. Darcy calibre hero. He spends most of the book in love with someone else, only to realize towards the end that she does not hold the high moral character he looks for in a wife, and noticing his saintly and ever-present cousin in a different light for the first time.

Mary and Henry Crawford may not be upstanding moral characters, but they were generally a lot more fun than Fanny and Edmund. In some ways, I ended the book thinking that they’d both made lucky escapes, free to marry other people (although Austen in her last chapter makes it clear that they don’t). Henry Crawford may have caused a scandal, but in a more modern romance, he would totally be the hero, the rake who gets reformed, and I would probably be cheering him on.

So now I’ve finally read all of Jane Austen’s novels. I must admit, I can’t see myself rereading Mansfield Park like I do the others. I didn’t have to actually put it down because it bored me to tears, but I did read two other books while finishing it, and it does not amuse and entertain at all as much as her other novels, for all that it’s a good work full of sharp observations and pithy commentary on Regency society and the social differences of the time.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. For more of Malin’s reviews, check out her blog, Malin’s Book of Blogs.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Real-Life Jane Lynch More Like "Party Down" Character than "Glee" Character | What? No Angry Hate Sex | Jason Lee Pours on the Sleazy Charm in "Memphis Beat" | Also: Is "Entourage" the Gayest Show on TV Not Called "Glee"?









Comments

See, I always figured Jane Austen wrote Mansfield Park on a dare, to see if she could make a character she would normally sideline (relentlessly good and fairly boring) the main character for a novel.

And though it's far from my favorite Austen novel, I've always found Mansfield Park fascinating for all the shocking behaviors bubbling to the surface around Fanny, that sort of endanger her ability to live in this delicate shell of purity.

Posted by: misselise at May 20, 2010 8:57 AM

Congratulations, Malin! I agree with your review - not the best, and I don't think I'll re-read it, either.

Posted by: Chickaboom at May 20, 2010 9:21 AM

Is this the one where Rose Tyler plays Fanny Price and looks and acts like she is completely miscast?

Yeah, OK, I haven't read this one either. Just the synopsis bored me to tears.

Posted by: BWeaves at May 20, 2010 9:52 AM

Congrats, Malin! I read this sometime in high school, but I have little to no recollection of what I thought about it it is that boring.

Posted by: kelsy at May 20, 2010 10:37 AM

Congratulations on finishing Cannonball!

Posted by: Sbrown at May 20, 2010 11:55 AM

I'm in the middle of re-re-re-reading this for the Cannonball (I'm way behind!). Once a year I read my collected works of Austen. This one is my least favorite, save for Emma. But you're right, Fanny is such a drip, and Edmund's not much better. Mrs. Norris may be one of the most evil characters in literature. I hate her.

Posted by: Captain Tuttle at May 20, 2010 12:05 PM

First of all, congrats on finishing Cannonball! You should definitely be proud.

Second: I understand the MP hate. It's certainly Austen's least "sparkling" work, and her heroine is more sober and Quakerish than any of the others. Having said that, it's my personal favorite, because it perplexes me the most. How Fanny, seemingly such a doormat, can resist the pressures of her uncle and the temptations around her, never ceases to fascinate me. And then of course, there's her love for Edmund, who IS a drip (but that's a rant I won't go into).

You nicely summarized the plot and problems modern readers identify in the novel. It certainly doesn't have the splendor of P and P, but it is worthy in its own right.

@Captain Tuttle: Emma is also my least favorite. I can't get through it without getting mad at Emma every time.

Posted by: bonnie at May 20, 2010 12:55 PM

I love MANSFIELD PARK. Only a genuis like Jane Austen could make us understand that boring people rule and the world is better for it.
Also, I love the fact that Fanny's poor relations are portrayed as worst than her rich ones.

Posted by: Arkansan at May 20, 2010 1:34 PM

While it fills me with joy that yet another of my reviews have been published here (I KNEW reading Mansfield Park would pay off), I must in all honesty say that I haven't actually read and blogged the 52 books yet. I finished book 51 this evening, and will start book 52 (a Doctor Who novel - I promised my husband) tomorrow. Both reviews should be up during the weekend.

So I don't quite deserve to be in the winner's circle with JenK yet. But soon.

Posted by: Malin at May 20, 2010 5:43 PM

The movie adaption should have made the list of "movies that were better than the book." I have had the book for years and have never been able to get through it, although I normally Love Jane Austin, but the movie is one of my favorites. Fanny isn't portrayed as a drip, but rather a woman stuck in a bad situation refusing to take the path of least resistance if it means compromising her soul. I highly recommend it.

Posted by: Jennifer at May 20, 2010 9:57 PM

I read this book back when I was in high school and then again a couple of years ago (10 years after high school). I hated it the first time and didn't like it any better the second. I just loathe Fanny Price.

Posted by: Pia at May 21, 2010 12:13 AM

I think Mansfield Park is the story of an abused heroine. The reason Fanny turns out the way she is is because since the age of six or seven she is emotionally abused and devalued by her new family except for Edmund. I can't find the Crawford's as delightful as others do, since most of their charm and social skills are used precisely to wound and dominate others. At least Henry's are, and his sister doesn't find anything really appalling in this behavior. I don't see what's so charming about that. Why would anybody cheer these two on? Because they're fun at a party before they decide to break your heart? They're unquestionably villainous, at least as villainous as you can get in an Austen novel without losing your humanity.

The thing about Fanny is that she's not some relentlessly good person like people keep describing her as. She's been abused all her life, and the story shows her noticing all the nastiness that happens around her and doing her best to stay above it, to not give in. She isn't weak or drippy at all if she can do that, even if she isn't capable, because of her situation in life, of resisting most of her Mansfield Park situations and of giving snappy comebacks like that 1999 adaptation had her doing.

I did find most of the first half boring, but that's because I was getting tired of all the details of Henry Crawford courting Maria and Julia, with all the intrigue that didn't even involve Fanny because she was just an observer. The second half, in which Fanny is more of a central player, makes the book memorable for me.

Posted by: On Mansfield Park at May 22, 2010 10:41 PM

Hey! I was searching on google for sites smiliar to your and luckly fund your site and I'm already a fan! keep up the good work.Please add more new posts daily, because I will definitely come back

Posted by: Carroll B. Merriman at March 6, 2011 2:32 PM

I don't know if I see where you are comming from, but do indeed elaborate a little more. Thanks

Posted by: atlanta plasitc surgeon online help at March 10, 2011 7:09 PM

Thanks i like your blog very much , i come back most days to find new posts like this.

Posted by: Luigi Fulk at March 15, 2011 2:03 PM

Spot on with this write-up, I actually suppose this website needs far more consideration. I’ll in all probability be again to read much more, thanks for that info.

Posted by: cheap Cardigans for Men at March 16, 2011 11:23 AM