web
counter
 

Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury

By Robert Scott | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (12)



3113297454_e285db35be.jpg

I count myself a Science Fiction nerd. I will freely admit that my reading list is veritably smothered in it and I’ve now become quite comfortable with the stigma that it may bring. That being said, I feel no small amount of shame that this is the first of Ray Bradbury’s books I’ve ever read. I throw myself upon the mercy of the bespectacled court; please make sure the phasers are set on stun.

Fahrenheit 451: the temperature at which book paper catches fire, and burns. That’s the tagline of this 50th anniversary edition of the book and, of course, burning books is the central premise upon which the story unfolds. Guy Montag is a firefighter. However, in this day and age, firefighting has taken on a whole different meaning. Guy is charged with the socio-political responsibility of burning books wherever they may be found. There are still all the lights and sirens that we associate with being a firefighter — they even have a pole to slide down on — but now, when the fire engine pulls up outside your door, it is met with trepidation not relief. Whereas water used to be the fluid of salvation, kerosene has become the liquid of suppression. Guy goes about his duties with the typical verve that a firefighter must have and he never thought twice about lighting a match to save people from themselves. That is, until a new neighbor moved in.

Clarisse McLellan is 17 and, as is typical of persons of that age, doesn’t care for how society requires her to think and behave. Guy and Clarisse happen to meet one day while he is returning home from work and they engage in a bit of idle banter. Guy is initially confused and a little disturbed by Clarisse’s questions and opinions; however he chalks them up to youthful ignorance. But, Clarisse asks, “Have you ever read any of the books you burn?” Of course he hasn’t; reading books illegal. Guy continues about his normal routine and even manages to talk to the strange girl next door on occasion. Eventually, Clarisse’s views causes Guy to begin questioning what he once thought were societal norms which causes no small amount of stress at work and home. His boss begins interrogating him due to the inquiries Guy makes and his wife becomes concerned that he’s acting strangely. That is, when she can pull herself away from the people on the wall. Guy tries to hide his new unconventional feelings from everybody but he is also hiding something else: a book. When Guy’s indiscretion is finally uncovered, his own firefighting unit must pay him a visit which could cost Guy everything, including his life.

One of the reasons I love science fiction so much is that good authors base their writing in reality. It may not be today’s reality, but a writer with a modicum of skill can make you believe that a particular event or invention could easily happen by connecting it with the familiar. In Fahrenheit 451, Bradbury has proven himself somewhat of a prognosticator of our own times. Originally published in a shorter form in Galaxy Science Fiction in 1951, we can easily form associations to our own regulated and addictive multimedia world. How much time do you spend on the internet? What’s your favourite reality TV program? Would you rather talk to real, meat-bag people, or would you prefer to type? Do you want your movies with or without full-frontal nudity?

I believe media consumption is an underlying message in the book, but what Bradbury was definitely alluding to, was the book burnings that various parties engaged in historically and the control of information. It doesn’t take a minute to correlate many present day crusaders that are doing the very same thing that is the fireman’s mantra. Consider certain religious groups that insisted the Harry Potter books be banned from school libraries for promoting witchcraft. Or perhaps the FCC dictating that a pastied boob was more offensive than a number of men trying to tear each other’s heads off. Perhaps one could question the MPAA and their dictation of what may or may not be shown in a movie theatre. It doesn’t matter that a person could just change the channel, not go to the movie or decide not to buy the book; there is someone who knows better what’s appropriate for you, and damned if you question them.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba After Dark 8/15/10 | Vengeance Trailer | Try To Ignore The Cliches









Comments

Fahrenheit 451: a nice sorbet to cleanse the palate after the last book review. When I read this book in my early twenties I was full of rage against the censors. But you are so right: I read it again recently an so much more of the future trajectory of pop culture came through this time. Have you seen the movie version with Julie Christie? There's a great scene with the wife watching the people on the wall that could have been filmed in any living room in 2010.

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 16, 2010 9:28 AM

What a beautiful review.

The funds for my library have just been slashed in half. It was an extremely sad day when they announced that they will be closed on Fridays. And this library is on the national Top 10 list. To think of libraries closing completely in areas without funding makes me want to weep. And then I hear politicians who don’t mind this, who actually support closing libraries, because they claim the internet is all people need. It’s infuriating.

It’s enough to make me run out and buy Fahrenheit 451 and donate the book to my library.

Posted by: Scully at August 16, 2010 9:39 AM

I just re-read it because it was on my daughter's assigned reading list for the second time, and she was actually *happy* about that fact. It's not my favorite Bradbury book, but it's definitely more well-rounded than I remember from reading it was a teenager myself.

My house took a direct lightning hit a couple of weeks ago, blowing up half the electronics and causing quite a bit of damage. One of the side effects was that I had to replace my Old Reliable TV with a flat screen (you can't buy boxy TVs any more, best I can tell). My kid had been spending the week with my parents when this happened, and first thing she said when she saw the new TV is, "Oooh, now we can watch the people on the wall!".

Posted by: Wednesday at August 16, 2010 9:41 AM

first read this one about 30 years ago when i was a teen and re-read it about 5 years ago; it held up really well; a true classic

Posted by: splinter at August 16, 2010 9:44 AM

I read this early on in Cannonball. Enjoyed this review, it's a great book and well worth reading or re-reading as I found many of Bradbury's observations of our potential future to be well thought out.

You can read my review here at Mrs Smith Reads.

Posted by: Mrs Smith at August 16, 2010 10:05 AM

I actually haven't seen the movie, PaddyDog, but it is in my queue. I read the 50th anniversary edition and it has quite a good conversation with Bradbury at the back in which he discusses various aspects of the film. That's when I decided to see it. As for the people in the wall and 2010, I wholeheartedly concur.

Posted by: admin at August 16, 2010 10:10 AM

One of my all-time favorites that never gets old, no matter how many times I read it. Yeah, I'm a big sci-fi literature dork too (please please do a cannonball read of "Rendevous with Rama"!)

And apart from the already-mentioned extrapolations of technology, one of the best parts of the book is the one many people forget: that books originally weren't made illegal b/c of an oppressive government, but rather b/c people stopped wanting to read. In our world of more and more information, but less and less real comprehension, that scene has a chilling quality to me.

The movie is decent - if a little slow and too European (the book clearly has an American setting) - but the omission of the mechanical hound alone makes me want a remake.

Posted by: Jacktrade at August 16, 2010 11:51 AM

One little quibble - Firefighter as a term didn't exist for Bradbury when he wrote the book. I would even hazard that 'fireman' was a very purposefully chosen term and Ray, whom is a conceited and sour ol' bitcxh, will tell you such. Starting the review calling Montag a firefighter is just plain wrong.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at August 16, 2010 5:01 PM

I liked this novel a lot. I remember seeing something online a year or two ago about a girl who had to read this for a class and then she and her parents tried to get it banned because there was cursing and they burned the Bible. It makes me so angry how dense people can be sometimes. Just because something happens in a book doesn't mean the book is endorsing it - quite the opposite: it's showing you that it's wrong.
Good review.

Posted by: Jen K. at August 16, 2010 7:01 PM

Your place is valueble for me. Thanks!…

Posted by: Christine at March 7, 2011 1:35 AM

There are some interesting cut-off dates in this article but I don’t know if I see all of them center to heart. There may be some validity however I will take maintain opinion till I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we would like extra! Added to FeedBurner as effectively

Posted by: home remedies for acne at March 11, 2011 5:20 AM

*Aw, this was a really nice post. In idea I would like to put in writing like this additionally – taking time and actual effort to make a very good article… but what can I say… I procrastinate alot and by no means seem to get something done.

Posted by: Burton plones at March 22, 2011 11:18 AM