web
counter
 

There's a Time and a Place for God

By Jelinas | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (24)



h-annakarenina-01a.jpg

They say that you should write what you know. Plenty of books include references to their authors’ real life experiences. This is certainly the case for Anna Karenina.

The book actually follows two characters whose lives are loosely connected. The titular character, Anna Karenina, is married to a statesman, Alexei Karenin, and they have a young son, Seryozha. She has everything she could possibly want — or so she thinks until she meets the young, dashing Count Vronsky.

The second storyline follows Konstantin Levin, whom Tolstoy based largely on himself. Levin wants nothing more than a simple country living and a family to share it with, but the girl he loves, Kitty, has refused him because Vronsky has been flirting with her.

Anna’s brother, Stepan, is married to Kitty’s older sister, Darya. The book begins with a crisis in Stepan’s marriage: he’s been unfaithful to Darya. Ironically, Anna is the one who convinced Darya to forgive Stepan. Shortly thereafter, she meets Vronsky and carries out a flirtation with him that ends in adultery.

At first, Anna’s affair is about her infatuation with Vronsky and his near-worship of her. But after Karenin discovers their affair, she chooses to run away with Vronsky, and a destructive chain of events is set in motion.

In the meantime, Levin withdraws to his country estate to lick his wounds after Kitty rejects him. During his time there, he comes to truly appreciate the peace of pastoral living.

Tolstoy said that Anna Karenina was about family, and the contrast between the Karenins and the Levins shows two vastly different family lives: the idyllic, pastoral happiness of the Levins and the languid, corrosive misery of Anna and Vronsky.

There’s no question that Tolstoy is an amazing writer. After spending years being intimidated by Russian lit, I was surprised to find that Tolstoy was quite readable. Considering its length, the book is well-paced and doesn’t drag, except when it kind of needs to in order to accentuate the monotony and meaninglessness of Anna’s life.

However, I did find the novel somewhat self-indulgent at times. Levin’s progression through the novel mirrors Tolstoy’s life a little too precisely at times, to the detriment of the story. Tolstoy added Part Eight of the novel as an afterthought, and against his publisher’s advice — in fact, he self-published it because his publisher wouldn’t do it.

Being a Christian myself, I can understand why Tolstoy felt the need to add a Christian conversion for Levin at the end of the novel. However, from a literary point of view, the novel would have been stronger without the neat, happy ending.

It reminded me of when I first became a Christian in high school and tried to write the gospel into every essay assignment that year in a misguided attempt to give honor to God. I later came to see that it was OK for me to stick to the topic in my essays without trying to force God into it. I learned that there was a time and a place for God-related conversations, and that high school English wasn’t always the appropriate avenue for sharing my enthusiasm for my budding faith in God.

From a story standpoint, it was odd to me that Levin seemed to have already found peace and happiness in his family life, and that he suddenly starts to feel all conflicted and miserable out of nowhere, and at the very end of the story. While I can agree with Tolstoy’s message there, I didn’t think it added much to the impact of the novel as a whole. There was a reason I never got higher than a B on any of my “Christian tangent” essays.

But, at the end of the day, there’s no denying that Anna Karenina is a pretty amazing work, and it was definitely worth the read.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. For more of Jelinas’ reviews, check out Book Bloggy Blog.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



The 2010 Teen Choice Awards Nominations | Here's Your Participation Award | News: Twilight Producer Wants to Remake Martyrs









Comments

Anna karenina is one of my very favorite books. i was hard pressed on the comment diversion about books to choose between hamsun and tolstoy. i have to say, if i had to go to an island with 10 or 20 books, karenina and tolstoy's "resurrection" would be in the pile.

personally, as a man reading the book, i was torn between sympathy for anna, and hating her, and I was still crushed about the train which i guess settles that debate.

I was lucky enough to read anna karnenina while holed up in the country. i spent my days taming wild spaces, and my evenings tiredly reading. i spaced it out. at the time it was normal for me to gulp books down, sometimes at a single sitting, but i read anna over months. lingered. dwelled. lived in time like the characters. one of the best times of my life.

Posted by: idleprimate at June 15, 2010 8:40 AM

I read the book many years ago after watching the tremendous Masterpiece Theatre production almost 30 years ago. I did enjoy the book very much. I would like to put in a plug for the TV series. Anna was wonderfully played by the very talented and beautiful Nicole Pagett.

Posted by: Phil at June 15, 2010 8:45 AM

The moral of the story: if thou doest as Nicole commands, and thou shalt be rewarded with thine review on Pajiba.

Off to catch up on some more book reviews! Reading, YAY!! :D

Hope that those Pajibans who hated this book (and I know there are a lot of you) come out to play in the comments, anyway.

Posted by: Jelinas at June 15, 2010 8:48 AM

Also, idleprimate's story made me super-jealous. You know where I read most of Anna K? On the LA Metro. BOOOOO.

Posted by: Jelinas at June 15, 2010 8:50 AM

It is a good book, but it's a book you have to be ready to read, especially if you're not familiar with Russian lit and the endless variations on nicknames and patronymics and slipping into French every time a servant appears on the scene.

Anna's a heartbreaking character. She makes an incredibly brave choice, given her culture, for such stupid, stupid reasons.

It's also not a book to read if you've just been dumped by somebody.

Posted by: Wednesday at June 15, 2010 8:58 AM

The Russian naming thing is maybe the most Russian thing about the novel. Tolstoy, to me, is more Victorian; Dostoevsky more Slavic. And I don't want to suggest that this is a hard-and-fast literature rule, but usually folks who really like Dostoevsky tend not to like Tolstoy (and vice versa).

This, of course, will raise a cry of, "But I would totally marry both of them."

Anyway.

I think Tolstoy is looking at more than two marriages; there are three to consider:

* Anna and Karenin/Anna and Vronsky

* Levin and Kitty

* Stiva and Dolly

I'm most interested in the Stiva/Dolly marriage at this point in my re-readings. Stiva, for me, is the actual villain in the novel. He never struggles with infidelity; he merely wants to find ways to make it easy to always buy coral necklaces for dancers. Karenin is easy to read as a heartless monster; but I think he's just a very limited man in Russian society who has no concept of unhappiness in marriage. His struggle, and failure, break my heart more and more each time.

Vronsky is an interesting character because he's introduced to us as a bit of a twentysomething cad, popular and with his own twenthysomething's moral code. But the Vronsky we meet at the beginning is not the Vronsky who trudges off to his fate at the novel's end.

It's an absolute favorite novel of mine, and rewards rereading and rethinking.

Posted by: Mike B. at June 15, 2010 9:18 AM

I read this while in college--during the semester that I read for fun rather than attend class. I recall generally liking it, but I thought that some of the social messages were a bit heavy handed and really didnt't belong with the rest of the story (I've always had similar issues with a lot of Dickens). It seemed like there were about 100 pages in the middle of the book about the plight of Russian peasants that really did not go with the rest of the novel. On the whole, I prefer Dostoyevsky.

Posted by: maceo at June 15, 2010 9:19 AM

i absolutely fall into the class of loving dostoevsky and tolstoy. i used to have trouble reconciling that.

dost was interested in dirt. following the untidy pathways of the mind and heart. tolstoy was intesetsted in air. examining our breath ad how high we might reach..

Posted by: idleprimate at June 15, 2010 9:57 AM

OK, so, this novel is my Moby Dick. I mean that in the sense that it is my white whale; it's the thing I've been after forever and still haven't caught it.

This is the book I've started to read AT LEAST 4 times. I've never gotten more than halfway through, usually far less than that. I don't know why; it isn't that I haven't liked what I've read, and miserable marriage tales are right up my alley, as are depressing endings. *sigh* Someday, Moby ... erm, Anna! Someday I will FINISH YOU!

dost was interested in dirt. following the untidy pathways of the mind and heart. tolstoy was intesetsted in air. examining our breath ad how high we might reach..

P.S. Did anybody else get a little warm reading this? Or get a little crush on idleprimate just now? ...yeah, I didn't think I'd be the only one.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at June 15, 2010 10:19 AM

I've read AK twice. The first time (19 yrs old), I was swept up by the romantic bravery of the beautiful oppressed Anna, and the second time (28 yrs old) I found her totally insufferable and selfish. I kept trying to figure out why I had initially found Karenin to be so monstrous and cold, but like Mike B., I think he is a much more sympathetic character, particularly when you consider the social ramifications of infidelity and divorce at the time, though we find them unfathomable now.

I don't think I'll read it again. I threw it down a couple of times.

Posted by: HB at June 15, 2010 10:36 AM

Another good love story, passion play, Satanic intrique, burlesque, anti-totalitarian, classic, and a Russian master who came after the big two mentioned here: read : The Master and Margarita, by Michael Bulgakov. An artistic experience you will never forget.

Posted by: rafael bolero at June 15, 2010 12:18 PM

The book is wonderful, but I loathed Anna as a character and found it impossible to have any sympathy for her whatsoever. Sure, she was pretty broken up with Karenin took her son away, but it wasn't until she lost Vronsky that she threw herself in front of the train.

Posted by: Carolina Girl at June 15, 2010 12:59 PM

There is a thing about Tolstoy: yes, he`s a genius, no question about that, but he also is a preacher, and a heavy-handed one. It might be not as obvious for those, who only read two or three of his novels, but it is so. I read almost everything the guy wrote, trying to understand why exactly I don`t like his books (I`m Russian, Tolstoy is one of our Great Writers, one of those we know from our childhood to be Something Big, on of those we MUST read, and, in other words, one of those you can`t just dismiss with a simple "not my thing" without wondering, whether there is something wrong with you), and it all come down to him preaching the ideas I`m not comfortable with.
There is all the political and religious stuff (Nechludov`s (from "Resurrection") and Levin`s multi-paged insights are basically author tracts on that, and there are also Tolstoy`s philosophical essays): trying to organize societyby rational means is entirely pointless, the only thig working (at least with Russian people) is the ability to channel the great unknown inner currents of the "spirit of the people", same with organized religion, etc...
But the most unsettling thing about Tolstoy are his views on family and women ("all the happy families are happy in the same way"... yeah, right). A woman is only "good" as long as she is motherly and animalistic. The highest form of love a man can feel for a woman is entirely free of lust (which, having in mind Tolstoy`s personal history... well "hypocrite" is a big word, but...) and is all about her being a mother of his children. A woman feeling lust? Bad. A woman not wanting (more) kids, not liking babies? Evil. An adulterous woman? She dies, period. Anna was dead the minute she laid her eyes on Vronsky, there was only the question of how (and the "how" is great - Tolstoy is a genius after all). Well, at least "Anna Karenina" is not "The Kreutzer Sonata", which is just plain scary.

And yes, there are "Tolstoy people" and "Dostoevsky people", like with cats and dogs...

Posted by: Jae at June 15, 2010 1:38 PM

I really want to give this another try, but the simple truth is that I just...can't be bothered. See, I tried to read it. And I kinda liked it? But then I got about halfway through, got bored, got distracted for some reason, put the book down and just could never muster up enough interested to finish reading it. The apathy won. Maybe I will conquer it some day.

Posted by: figgy at June 15, 2010 1:42 PM

figgy, I think that's a pretty common reaction. A friend of mine has been halfway through it for a year and a half now. However, it is SO worth giving another try. It is actually absorbing as long as you're not super busy while trying to read it (ha!).

Anyway, it's in my top 5 for sure.

Posted by: esme at June 15, 2010 3:43 PM

i so wonder about the folk that turn away. i think of this as a page turner, you cant put it down. it is such a soap opera that there is no way to turn away. and yet modern readers cant even step up. i wonder what they are reading.

Posted by: idleprimate at June 15, 2010 3:58 PM

"and yet modern readers cant even step up."

You could be a little more charitable to modern readers. Contemporary readers of Tolstoy's novel weren't puppies-and-rainbows about it. Tolstoy himself disavowed both Anna Karenina and War and Peace when he came crazily out the other end of his religious conversion.

I also don't entirely understand this point you make, either: "dost[oevsky] was interested in dirt. following the untidy pathways of the mind and heart. tolstoy was intesetsted in air. examining our breath a[n]d how high we might reach." It sounds great, but I worry that it breaks down under consideration. I think both writers are equally interested in the untidy pathways (for instance, Stiva, via Tolstoy; Raskolnikov, via Dostoevsky) and the rarefied air (Sonia, by way of Dostoevsky; Levin through Tolstoy). Where they part ways, I think, is in how "Russian" they sound. Dostoevsky fits much more cleanly on the Russian Literature Continuum (tm) that gets to Bulgakov than Tolstoy does. I think Dostoevsky is much more interested in the fate of Russia; Tolstoy is interested in the fate of his characters. But even that is almost too trite.

And while I love the novel (maybe not as much as you love the novel; but that's an irritating contest anyway) -- I don't think it's always a page-turner. Levin can be insufferable, and I am less interested in his fate than I am with the fates of Dolly and Karenin. And there's a hunting scene towards the end of the novel that brings the whole narrative to a wrenching standstill. There are lovely moments with mushrooms and love that almost but not quite makes it. But the novel is a page-turner only literally, in that one has to turn the pages to continue reading it.

Posted by: Mike B. at June 15, 2010 4:45 PM

Well...I'd like to think I'm far from your average 'modern reader', but as with everything...some things you just don't get into.

Posted by: figgy at June 15, 2010 9:19 PM

Figgy, I'm with you. I've been working on this book for months now. I really don't find anything to like about any of the characters. If I don't like the characters I just can't get into the book.
I'll finish it, eventually, because that's what I do. I'm just not sure how long it will take.

Posted by: trixie at June 16, 2010 12:02 AM

"If I don't like the characters I just can't get into the book."

I understand that sentiment -- but I also really like this comment that Fran Lebowitz: "A book...should take you away. A book is not supposed to be a mirror. It's supposed to be a door."

Posted by: Mike B. at June 16, 2010 9:41 AM

Hey have you heard of this debt relief company called National Relief?

Posted by: credit debt at March 10, 2011 8:42 AM

I actually understand the concept be hind this. I would have done it a tad diffrently.

Posted by: seo for plastic surgeons at March 11, 2011 2:41 PM

@willywashere it is appreciated. some days i just need breaks. I'm not dating him so i get sick of him.

Posted by: free online dating at March 17, 2011 3:03 AM

*Oh my goodness! an amazing article dude. Thank you However I am experiencing issue with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anyone getting identical rss problem? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Thnkx

Posted by: Matthew H. Sriner at March 23, 2011 3:48 AM