web
counter
 

A Wrinkle in Time, by Madeleine L'Engle

By Intern Rusty | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (21)



340x_wrinkleintime.jpg

I can’t remember the last time I read this book, but it had to be at least ten years ago and I probably read it the first time when I was about eight and it’s one of the few books from my childhood that I could remember specific details from as an adult.

A Wrinkle in Time tells the story of Meg Murray, her bother Charles Wallace and their friend Calvin O’Keefe as they travel across the universe to rescue Meg and Charles’s father who has been trapped on a distant planet for years. This is a very simplified version of the plot, but it’s necessary to boil it down to it’s most essential elements.

This book stayed with me not necessarily because of the plot, but because of the emotions Meg experiences. Her feelings are strong, conflicting, and frequently not the sort of things that good, smart girls are “supposed” to feel. She hates her appearance and wishes she could fit in better while at the same time lashing out at anyone who teases her for not fitting in. She can be sullen, moody, and aggressive. Her journeys place a responsibility on her that is too great, and she knows that it is too great and actively rebells against that responsibility being placed on her. Too frequently in books where children are given great tasks they rise to the occasion like it’s only natural that an 11 year old should defeat powerful enchantments and face down an adult wizard. The fact that Meg doesn’t made her much more real to me.

Other parts of the book bug me, though. Charles Wallace’s precociousness can be a little hard to take when he addresses his much older sister with “good girl” as he’s walking her through a deductive reasoning process. I’ve never had a genius telepath for a little brother, but I do have a particularly bright younger sister and I can promise you if she ever said “good girl” to me at a similar age she would have been pinched under the table and hard. I understand that he’s different and special and Meg and her whole family have nothing but love for him, but siblings are siblings and Charles addressing Meg (or his mother, in other passages) in such condescending fashion doesn’t read “intuitive genius as a young child” to me as much as it reads “arrogant little shit.”

A Wrinkle In Time is an imaginative and interesting children’s book that has stood the test of time. The details of Meg’s everyday life are generic enough that the story really hasn’t aged too much, and Tessering is still an unknown technology so those sections are still intriguing as well. The writing doesn’t insult the intelligence of children, and the characters are flawed enough to be relatable (except Charles Wallace, but I don’t think he’s supposed to be relatable). My mom read it as a kid, I read it, and whenever I have kids they’ll probably read it, too.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. For more of Rusty’s reviews, check out her blog or catch her each evening, Sunday through Thursday, here on Pajiba, where she hosts Pajiba After Dark.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Dustin Will Soon Be Out of A Job | The Beginning of Pajiba's End | Reese Witherspoon IS Peggy Lee | ...IN "Peggy Lee: Man of Action"









Comments

Posted by: Scully at August 10, 2010 9:19 AM

This was the first sci-fi book I read, and I read it when I was 11. It also stuck with me, I think because the protagonist was a girl my age and I could really relate to her. I also thought the little brother was an arrogant little shit, hahaha.

It also stuck with me because it starts, "It was a dark and stormy night . . ."

But the tesseract, and Aunt Beast, and the psycho stuff also stayed with me. And there was a cute boy, too, I think. And witches.

I recently reread it in the last couple of years and it just didn't hold up. After reading the Harry Potter's, I started rereading books I loved as a child, and some of them just missed it as an adult. However, I still think an 11 year today would love A Wrinkle In Time.

Posted by: BWeaves at August 10, 2010 9:25 AM

Oh, great. Here we go. It's gonna be one of those days. Better start practicing...

Yes, Dear.
Right away, Dear.
Anything for you, Dear.

Ok, then... don't screw this up, Mulder, you lunk head. Your back can't take much more of the couch...

Posted by: Mulder at August 10, 2010 9:47 AM

The fact that L'Engle always writes it as "Charles Wallace", and never "Charles", or even "Chuck" drove me bananas.
Inevitably someone says his full name in nearly every line of dialogue. As a child i grew to hate him with a passion.

Posted by: Scott at August 10, 2010 9:51 AM

You're approaching dangerous territory, honey.

You know that thing I do? You know, the one you like oh so very much? Yesss. That thing. Remember how much you like that? You do? Yeah, I thought so.

Keep practicing the Dears. They help. Maybe you can come back to bed tonight. Maybe.

Posted by: Scully at August 10, 2010 9:52 AM

Love you, Dear.

Posted by: Mulder at August 10, 2010 10:26 AM

This was my favorite book as a child. I still have a copy, and had actually been considering re-reading it, but maybe I should just let it stay in my happy memories.

Posted by: Drake at August 10, 2010 11:25 AM

I still love this book, and certainly a big part of that is because of the strong emotion I had for it as a child. I also highly recommend the third book 'A Swiftly Tilting Planet.' Same characters, but involved in time travel and some engaging 'what-ifs' - very entertaining.

Posted by: fenchurch at August 10, 2010 11:55 AM

I always loved this book. Of course it has its flaws, but I think that's also partly because it was primarily written for children/youth who wouldn't completely pick it apart the way us asshole adults would. But anyway... this is sort of a skimpy/hasty review, no? I know with the Cannonball Read you can't have a buttload of time to go in depth with plot and symbolism and everything, but there's a whole lot more to this book than simply characterising Meg as pretty normal and Charles Wallace as pretty abnormal.

Posted by: b at August 10, 2010 11:59 AM

I loved this book (& the others in the series) when I was a kid. I re-read it recently, and it didn't hold up for me either. Meg was too much of a drama queen, and the whole Aunt Beast thing was weird. I was going to read the rest of these books again, but I've decided to leave well enough alone. They aren't as good as I remember.
So instead I'm reading the entire Harry Potter series for the hundredth time. Long live the Chosen One!

Posted by: Lemon Poundcake at August 10, 2010 12:01 PM

I loved this book when I was younger, although I think I liked "A Wind in the Door" and "Many Waters" better, perhaps because I read it first, and perhaps because I was an annoying precocious child and Charles Wallace's obnoxiousness hit a bit too close to home sometimes.

Posted by: Phaeolus at August 10, 2010 12:09 PM

This is one of those books that seems like everyone has read, but I never got around to. Maybe one day!

Posted by: Sara at August 10, 2010 12:47 PM

Yes, Meg is a drama queen, but she's a 13 year old girl whose father has been missing for years and whose younger brother is, to put it mildly, eccentric. Most 13 year old girls are drama queens and they don't have nearly the same excuses. I felt like the portrayal of her was frighteningly accurate.

I also didn't mind the portrayal of Charles Wallace, who we see primarily through Meg's eyes. Yes, he's an arrogant brat, but that almost leads to his (and Meg's, Calvin's and Dr. Murray's) undoing.

I love that Meg is unsure of herself. I love that she needs to learn to embrace her imperfections, and I love that there isn't some huge, clichéd physical and mental transformation as a result. That's not how life works. Things usually change much more subtly, and I think that the book handles that really well.

For me, the book has not only held up in the last 20 years, but I think I appreciate it even more now than when I first read it as a 10 year old.

Posted by: chipwitch at August 10, 2010 1:49 PM

As someone who read it in college for the first time, it had a lot of resonance for my adult life. I've since gone to read the entire series, and I will say that A Swiftly Tilting Planet is my favorite.

Posted by: bonnie at August 10, 2010 1:54 PM

I love everything by L'Engle. I still own a lot of her books and I think have 2 copies of this one. It was different from most of the crap I was given to read as a child, which is why I particularly enjoyed it.

Posted by: MyySharona at August 10, 2010 6:44 PM

Bonnie, I have to agree with you, A Swiftly Tilting Planet is my favorite out of the whole series. I think I have everything she's written and have read it umpteen times.

For those of you who've only read A Wrinkle in Time, if you continue to read the books, the characters develop more as they grow up.

And for those of us who grew up in the South, the whole two-name thing is not at all unusual. I guess that never really bothered me because I'm kind of used to it. I still get the double-name thing at family reunions, and I don't even use my middle name normally.

Posted by: kellyo at August 11, 2010 8:26 AM

The first time I read this book, I loved it. The second time I read it, I was a few years older and the climactic scene made me cry. I have read it countless times since and my perceptions of the book change every time. Case in point (possible spoiler ahead) - I first read A Wrinkle in Time as a single-digit, and when Calvin "kisses" Meg before she returns to Camazotz, it registered in my mind as a kiss on the cheek. In later years (and even now?), my brain wasn't so sure where he kissed her anymore...

It makes me think that this could be a textbook example of good writing and storytelling. Wonder how Harry Potter will hold up through the generations...

Posted by: kiyo-chan at August 11, 2010 1:10 PM

I read this book as a kid, I think for school, and did not like it at all. I was actually planning on someday re-reading it when I was older, like maybe I would appreciate it more with a more experienced viewpoint, but judging by the comments, the opposite result will probably happen. Fare thee well, L'Engle!

Posted by: SaBrina at August 11, 2010 9:03 PM

I think Charles Wallace had to be the way he was, in order for Meg to rescue him. Nowadays, his personality disorder would likely be labeled as Asperger's syndrome or even borderline autistic. Meg's emotional self-awareness is the key to saving her brother's soul. I didn't get that the first time I read the book though - I was probably 13 or 14. Worth another read, for sure.

Posted by: maewest at August 12, 2010 12:46 AM

An interesting dialogue is value comment. I believe that you need to write extra on this matter, it might not be a taboo subject but typically persons are not sufficient to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers

Posted by: best Cardigans for Men at March 16, 2011 5:55 PM