web
counter
 

Cannonball Read III: Big Girls Don’t Cry: The Election that Changed Everything For American Women by Rebecca Traister

By Carolyn | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (9)



clintonpalin.jpg

Here’s the main thing: Rebecca Traister can write her ass off. If anyone was going to be up to the Herculean task of summarizing what went down in the 2008 elections with regard to gender, race, and class it was Traister. Maybe I’m a glutton for punishment, but I have already read a couple of the behind-the-scenes accounts of the election which were interesting, but ultimately forgettable. Reading Big Girls Don’t Cry brought back the most infuriating moments of the year leading up to the election. This isn’t the just story of the candidates; it’s the story of how the 2008 campaign brought out the still-raw feelings of the women’s movement. It’s about how on one hand, women are more influential and powerful than we have ever been, but on the other hand, women hold only about 17% of the seats in the House and Senate.

While I was reading the book, I couldn’t help reading sections out loud to my eternally patient roommates, like this: “What Palin so beguilingly represented…was a form of female power that was utterly digestible to those who had no intellectual or political use for actual women: feminism without the feminists.” I felt, quite often, like yelling, “Oh snap!”as if I were watching a freestyle battle and Traister was killing it against every sad sack pundit who botched getting to the deeper meanings of the 2008 election. When was the last time you read passages from a political book out loud because you found it so poignant and witty that you couldn’t help but share? Traister, a Salon reporter who covered the election extensively, draws from own her reporting as well as acute analyses of MSNBC coverage, daytime television talk shows, and many, many print pieces. Incorporating such powerful voices as Melissa Lacewell-Harris, Jessica Valenti, Gloria Steinem, and Rachel Maddow, Traister examines the sexism endured by Hillary Clinton by both the conservative and liberal media, the divide among liberal woman voters, and the catapulting of Sarah Palin as the queen of “the new feminism.”

Traister’s examination is not limited to the political world, as she also weighs in other American cultural markers such as the “Daily Show,” “Saturday Night Live,” and reactions from her colleagues. Most of the book focuses on Hillary Clinton and the media’s perception of her, calling her a shrew, castrating, and as legendary sack of shit Dick Morris put it, her “hiding behind the apron strings.” I’m sure that a lot of us remember hearing people say these things on TV, and being shocked when no one chastised them. Big Girls Don’t Cry goes into great detail about the Clinton campaign, especially the press coverage, which was different that year because so many women were in a position to report on a woman running for her party’s nomination. Traister also dissects the coverage of Sarah Palin, as well as that of Michelle Obama. She notes how many women were promoted to cover these women, making the presence of a woman in the anchor’s seat a media event for Katie Couric, old news when Diane Sawyer and Gwen Ifill and Christiane Amanpour became anchors. Women comedians were big news too, as they shaped the way we looked at the candidates. Traister covers the comedy angle especially well. One of my favorites is the line superdelegate Donna Brazile cracked to Stephen Colbert -“Look, I’m a woman, so I like Hillary. I’m black, I like Obama. But I’m also grumpy, so I like John McCain.”

What I found most interesting in the book was Traister’s conflicting feelings about Sarah Palin and what a woman like that meant for the feminist movement. “I didn’t know which was worse: watching a grim cycle lurch once more into gear or acknowledging that the Republicans and John McCain, in their attempts to manipulate the female electorate, had walked through a door that had been left opened by my own party.” Despite Palin’s sex, she had nothing in common with the typically identified women’s movement; she didn’t believe in abortion, even in the case of rape or incest, she wanted to cut government funding that would disproportionately affect poor women of color and, not to belabor the point, she did seem like a perfect idiot. But despite her feelings about Palin, Traister still had to point out the sexism Palin underwent as well, even from liberal, feminist websites. The book is a reminder that while women may have come far, the 2008 serves as a glaring reminder that we still have a long way to go.


For more of Carolyn’s reviews, check out her blog, cupcakesandcarbombs.

This review is part of Cannonball Read III. For more information, click here.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Kneel Before Zod...For Real This Time: Michael Shannon Cast In Man Of Steel | When Do the Kids Even Have Time for All That Premarital Sex?









Comments

That book sounds really interesting and I'll definitely give it a read. I thought that the treatment of gender during the 2008 election was so fascinating and I would love to see a well-thought-out dissection like what you've described.

Posted by: Sassafrass Green at April 11, 2011 10:06 AM

Excellent review, Carolyn.

Posted by: jamiepants at April 11, 2011 10:27 AM

I don't read political books generally, but I'll try to keep this one in mind for the next time my short-term reading stack totals less than five thousand pages.

Posted by: Todd at April 11, 2011 10:43 AM

I’m sure that a lot of us remember hearing people say these things on TV, and being shocked when no one chastised them.
---
Dick Morris is a weasel, but if you're "shocked" no one chastised Morris for using something as mild as "hiding behind the apron strings," try to imagine, just for a second, how us granny-starving, women-hating, black-people-despising, poor-people-trampling, catering-to-the-filthy-rich economic conservatives must feel.

That Palin was painted as a "perfect idiot" (and for all I know is) by the Left should come as little surprise to anyone old enough to remember that 1) Ford was painted as a bumbling idiot (as often well-parodied by Chevy Chase); 2) Reagan painted as a doddering old moron playing cowboy; 3) Bush I was painted as an out-of-touch idiot for not knowing how a bar-code scanner worked; 4) Quayle was painted as an idiot for misspelling "potato"; 5) Bush II was painted as an idiot and a puppet for being Bush II.

It's the Left's M.O.

(The Right's M.O., of course, is painting the Left's candidates as pointy-headed intellectuals -- see Gore, Kerry, Obama.)

Posted by: , at April 11, 2011 10:46 AM

It'll be interesting to see her references, if any, to my favorite feminist website, Pandagon.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at April 11, 2011 10:48 AM

It actually pains me to see HRC and Palin side-by-side here.

Posted by: samantha t at April 11, 2011 3:15 PM

Hi! Nice post. I learn something more challenging on different blogs everyday. It will always be stimulating to read content from other writers and practice a little something from their store. I’d prefer to use some with the content on my blog whether you don’t mind. Natually I’ll give you a link on your web blog. Thanks for sharing.

Posted by: jersey shore season 3 episode 5 megavideo at April 11, 2011 10:15 PM

Ossom review, Carolyn!! Sounds like a great read.

Posted by: Jelinas at April 13, 2011 2:40 AM

I was wondering if you ever considered changing the layout of your blog? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or two images. Maybe you could space it out better?

Posted by: buy Tricor at April 19, 2011 7:46 PM