web
counter
 

Cannonball Read III: A Visit from the Goon Squad by Jennifer Egan

By Amy | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (8)



jennifer-egan.jpg

**Alert**

This book was the winner of the Pulitzer Prize. It says so on the cover. I will not tell you whether or not that heightened or lowered my expectations of the contents. I will, however, tell you that I don’t believe I’ve ever read a Pulitzer Prize winning book, so this one felt special to me, and I was glad that I read it. (Okay, a quick look at the list shows that I am wrong and have read the following Pulitzer winners: The Old Man and the Sea, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Color Purple, Beloved, The Shipping News, Interpreter of Maladies, and Middlesex… phew!)

Jennifer Egan, will the time come that I am ever not seduced by your voluptous prose? The Keep was so magical, Look at Me, less so, but I held out hope and ordered a third book from you from the library, despite you batting a soild .500 in my personal “likes” department. This book has music pulsing through it as the undercurrent, and I felt attached to it as the past few books I’ve been reading have all had music in them somehow. The back of the book leads you to believe the story will revolve around Sasha, a “troubled” young girl with a penchant for pickpocketing, and her boss Bennie, head honcho at a record label. In fact, the book has many layers, following many story lines, that pick up off one another in unexpected and startling ways. There are so many plots and subplots, it made my head hurt, and more than once I had to flip back and forth between the chapters to remember how everyone was connected, but ultimately this multi-faceted approach lended credibility to the story in that it seemed more like real life.

Music held it together, all stories coalescing around a band, or a song, or a sound, or a music producer. Technology, growing up in a digital world, connectivity, etc. was the other bookend. I can pinpoint the part of the novel when Bennie begins to go into an inner monologue where Egan’s voice, which had annoyed me so much in her last novel, really shone through, but I trudged right along through and I’m glad I did. I’m excited that I can recognize her voice, pick out exactly where the novel goes from being just any old novel to her novel. It means I’ve been reading too much.

In terms of content, the book was very good and layered nicely. The interconnectivity of people was stretched pretty thin, but it worked for what it was. All of the characters had believable personalities, and each chapter felt more like it’s own encapsulated short story, so that helped with making this a short read. The first and last chapters dealt with Sasha and Bennie, which gave the novel the most cohesive feeling it had the entire time; their story starting in supposedly modern times and ending only a dozen or so years in the future, which made it all seem possible and creepier all at once. Unlike Super Sad True Love Story, which I will not be reviewing here, I get more unnerved by things that are supposed to happen in my near future, my current lifetime, as opposed to things that are set 50 or 100 years in the future. Coming of age in this digital time has been fascinating, but knowing that kids today won’t know a world without Google or Facebook makes me really sad. I suppose our grandparents probably say the same about computers or other modern coveniences such as the microwave… but I digress.

This book comes recommended from me, not because it’s a Pulitzer, but because it’s damn good. If you like music and you like to think about our wired world, this one’s for you. Good luck :)


For more of Amy’s reviews, check out her Cannonball Read III blog.

This review is part of Cannonball Read III. For more information, click here.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Celebrities in Cowboy Hats: Who Fills Out All 10 Gallons? | Paranormal Activity 3 Poster: Because Prequels are Always a Good Idea









Comments

I'll just go ahead and say it: I hated this book.

It's one of those books where, in the back of my mind, I know it's good, but I never connected with it. Couldn't wait to get to the end just so I could start something else.

Posted by: Zirze at September 21, 2011 11:37 AM

I started off hating this book but it grew on me when I realized it wasn't going to be about Sasha (because I found her character annoying). Actually, there wer no characters I liked in the book, but it was a good read nonethelss. I'm with you on the "near-future" stuff: it was just proximate enough and realistic enough to seem pretty solidly possible and therefore quite un-nerving. She did an excellent job there.

Posted by: PaddyDog at September 21, 2011 12:21 PM

I found Look at Me to be more on par with the "near future" idea, even though it is an older book. The pseudo-Facebook stuff was the creepiest to read, and reading this book in current times makes me wonder if she's onto something in the future. (Especially with the way people use their cell phones!) I waffle between really loving and really hating Egan's writing style. I mostly feel sad since her first book lead me to believe she was more of a supernatural-thriller type writer... oh well.

Posted by: Amy at September 21, 2011 12:53 PM

I wish you could review the end of everything by Megan abbot. I loved it but I'd like to hear another persons take on it.

Posted by: Nieve 'The Threadkiller Queen' at September 21, 2011 1:08 PM

I'm with Zirze, I had trouble finding what was so special about it. No doubt, it was smart... but if i put the book down for a few days, I had to back-chapter just to get my bearings. Kind of took the fun out of it for me.

Posted by: TJ at September 21, 2011 2:53 PM

I hated it too, and I think it was because I had a difficult time connecting with anyone in the book. All of the characters were flawed, but not in a relatable way. Egan's writing was strong and I did really enjoy Amy's (the daughter- I think that was her name) chart spread about love in the middle, but that was about it for me.

Posted by: Even Stevens at September 22, 2011 3:26 AM

Even - exactly! The chart spread was quite brilliant. The rest of the book was blah.

Posted by: Zirze at September 22, 2011 5:23 AM

I think there's a consensus building here. A good friend of mine recommended this book to me, and I read it, and I couldn't for the life of me figure out why she'd recommended it. I thought it was pretty ordinary. Ordinary language, about people it was really difficult to give a damn about, and a dose of really amateurish futurism toward the end.

William Gibson-lite. And after Zero History, that's really saying something about lite.

Posted by: rocky at September 23, 2011 3:30 AM