film / tv / politics / social media / lists / web / celeb / pajiba love / misc / about / cbr
film / tv / politics / web / celeb


Viggo Mortensen Has Issues With Some of the Career Choices of His 'Lord of the Rings' Director Peter Jackson

By Dustin Rowles | Celebrity | May 15, 2014 |

By Dustin Rowles | Celebrity | May 15, 2014 |

This week, Viggo Mortensen — who is about promoting his new film, The Two Faces of January — gave an interview with The Telegraph and opened up about his issues with the work of Peter Jackson, including two of the three Lord of the Rings films. After stating that the only reason he took the gig in the first place was because his son really loved the books, Mortenson revealed that the second and third films were initially a mess that nearly went straight to video.

“Anybody who says they knew it was going to be the success it was, I don’t think it’s really true,” he says. “They didn’t have an inkling until they showed 20 minutes in Cannes, in May of 2001. They were in a lot of trouble, and Peter had spent a lot. Officially, he could say that he was finished in December 2000 - he’d shot all three films in the trilogy - but really the second and third ones were a mess. It was very sloppy - it just wasn’t done at all. It needed massive reshoots, which we did, year after year. But he would have never been given the extra money to do those if the first one hadn’t been a huge success. The second and third ones would have been straight to video.”

He continues, saying that the technological advances that Jackson made after the first film caused him to lose touch with the subtlety of the story.

“Peter was always a geek in terms of technology but, once he had the means to do it, and the evolution of the technology really took off, he never looked back. In the first movie, yes, there’s Rivendell, and Mordor, but there’s sort of an organic quality to it, actors acting with each other, and real landscapes; it’s grittier. The second movie already started ballooning, for my taste, and then by the third one, there were a lot of special effects. It was grandiose, and all that, but whatever was subtle, in the first movie, gradually got lost in the second and third.”

He doesn’t stop there, either, suggesting that the big budgets went to Jackson’s head.

Now with The Hobbit, one and two, it’s like that to the power of 10…I guess Peter became like Ridley Scott - this one-man industry now, with all these people depending on him,” Mortensen adds. “But you can make a choice, I think…And Peter, I was sure he would do another intimately scaled film like Heavenly Creatures, maybe with this project about New Zealanders in the First World War he wanted to make. But then he did King Kong. And then he did The Lovely Bones - and I thought that would be his smaller movie. But the problem is, he did it on a $90 million budget. That should have been a $15 million movie. The special effects thing, the genie, was out of the bottle, and it has him.

Ouch. He’s not wrong, but damn brother, that’s cold. He did make you a rich motherf*cker with more financial freedom to star in movies no one will ever see like, for instance, The Two Faces of January.

The Telegraph via The Mary Sue

Screencapping Keri Russell's Wardrobe Malfunction on Last Night's 'The Colbert Report' | Ashton Kutcher: A True Hero

Dustin is the founder and co-owner of Pajiba. You may email him here, follow him on Twitter, or listen to his weekly TV podcast, Podjiba.