eggers.jpg
What is the What? Eggers, Capote, Lethem, and more ...

What Pajiba's Reading / The Pajiba Staff

Well, I finally finished The Naked and the Dead, and though it’s not the longest book I’ve ever read, it’s one of the more draining experiences I’ve had in recent memory. And I don’t just mean reading; I mean waiting in traffic, dealing with that weird guy in the online department at work, doing my taxes. Everything. Since I discussed the book last time, I won’t waste too much space on it here other than to say this: It’s a sweeping, at times beautiful story that’s drowned in its own sorrow by the end. I don’t mind a bloodbath when it comes to bumping off main characters, and deaths come with the territory in a war novel. But the characters’ personalities remain rooted in unfortunate stereotype, not to mention that they’re generally dull, unlikable men. The book’s anticlimactic ending would have had more impact if the penultimate scene among the recon squad had been placed at the end, but instead things wrap up in the mind and affairs of an officer back at camp. Sure, Mailer’s point about the plodding inevitably of the soulless war machine is well taken, but if our hearts and minds are supposed to be with recon, he should have honored them and given them the final say.

I was in the mood for something short after that. Short and smart and contemporary. I found all three in The Brief and Frightening Reign of Phil, a quick read — all of 130 pages — from short story author and Syracuse professor George Saunders. Saunders’ parable deals with the realm of Inner Horner, which is so small that “only one Inner Hornerite at a time could fit inside,” while the rest wait outside in the no man’s land between their own country and the much larger surrounding area of Outer Horner. Annoyed that they keep spilling over into his country, an Outer Hornerite named Phil decides one day to levy a tax against the Inner Hornerites for using his country, enlisting a few of his fellow citizens as a makeshift police force in the process. Saunders chronicles Phil’s despotic rise to power with a quick wit and economy of language that still carries emotional weight. The story can be interpreted several ways, including a sly critique of the United States’ current involvement in Iraq and the trampling of human rights that tends to happen when one nation overtakes another, as well as a look at the current reactions to immigration. The characters are physically indescribable, some hybrid of machine and man, complete with sliding brain racks and blinking blue lights, and they’re all outlandish enough to be eerily recognizable: The president of Outer Horner is an addle-minded leader who tends to ignore the present and fondly talk about the past; the members of the media literally speak out of their asses; etc. Saunders’ story is brilliant and funny and poignant, and a sadly relevant parallel to 21st-century America.

I read Lethem’s The Fortress of Solitude on a whim; it was one of those titles that had been floating around my subconscious that I knew for some reason I would have to pick up, so when I found a good copy at a hole-in-the-wall used bookstore near Hollywood and Las Palmas, I nabbed it. It was beautiful and rich and sad and funny and filled with a heady mix of youthful angst and comic-book mentality. That novel convinced me to read more Lethem, so I was excited to jump into Men and Cartoons, a collection of short stories loosely connected by, um, men and cartoons. Lethem’s skill at constructing perfectly realized little worlds didn’t hit me until the final page of the first story, “The Vision,” when I glanced down and saw that stretch of white below the last sentence and felt a sudden pang that the tale would be ending so soon. “Vision” is a wonderful start to the collection, a compelling little story that hints at the larger complexities of its main characters’ relationship while also revolving around Lethem’s favorite subject: grown-up boys who defined themselves as youths via the tortured heroes of Marvel Comics and who now find themselves wandering through a lonely adulthood and trying to fight the same battles. Lethem constantly shifts tone between stories, varying writing style and the narrator’s perspective as he swings from the poignant, reality-based “Vivian Relf” to the surreal quirk of “The Dystopianist, Thinking of His Rival, is Interrupted by a Knock on the Door.” Lethem hits his peak in “Super Goat Man,” an oddly realistic story about a superhero who gives up the rescuing business to teach at a tony private college in New England. It’s smart and sad and wonderfully unique. The only complaint I have about the book is that the trade paperback includes two stories — “This Shape We’re In” and “Interview With the Crab” — not featured in the original hardback, and they’re just tacked onto the end with little thought. They’re serviceable enough, but they’re jarringly different from the rest of the volume, which culminates in the elegiac “The National Anthem,” which is so damn beautiful I slowed down to savor every word. If I was uncertain before, Men and Cartoons sealed it: I loves me some Lethem. — Daniel Carlson

I was blown away by In Cold Blood when I read it many years ago, but I always knew there was another Truman Capote who I was missing — just as impressive a stylist, but cattier and wittier. I found that Capote in Answered Prayers, the novel that was unfinished when he died at the age of 59. He had been working on it in one form or another for more than 25 years, and everything in it had been published in magazines while he was still alive. Many of the characters are thinly veiled representations of his many famous friends, so the public appearance of the material caused a few bridge-burnings. With his flair for summing people up, it’s easy to understand the hurt feelings:

[A]s Kate McCloud has said, ‘A really good lay is worth a trip around the world — in more ways than one.’ And Kate McCloud, as we all know, has earned an opinion: Christ, if Kate had as many pricks sticking out of her as she’s had stuck in her, she’d look like a porcupine.

Capote, even more ambitious than he was talented — and he was very talented — wanted Answered Prayers to be his In Search of Lost Time. It doesn’t approach that level, which is an obvious assessment, and maybe unfair, too, since he never had the chance to make it what he had envisioned. It’s filled with name-dropping that occasionally feels dull, but there are several brilliant extended passages that make up for that.

In addition to picking up the rest of his work, I’m also about 200 pages into Capote, a biography written by Gerald Clarke. I’m lucky to have the original version, borrowed from Mom, with Capote himself on the cover, rather than the new version, graced by Philip Seymour Hoffman. After the recent movies that focused on the dreary years of In Cold Blood, the book is a sweeping romp — Capote’s childhood was a somewhat troubled one, but his early career in New York is dramatic, dazzling, and proof that the Age of Gawker is a pale, pale copy of past gossip and glamour. — John Williams

After a long, multi-month struggle, I’ve finally given it up. It wasn’t an easy decision, nor was it one I don’t feel guilty about. Indeed, it comes with a heavy, aching heart. I don’t normally have issues with prematurely retiring novels, of course, but it’s different when the author is one of my favorites, when the novel is so noble and well-intentioned, and when the story is so weighty and imperative. And now, sadly, 250 pages in, I have resigned myself to the knowledge that I will never fully understand What the What is. I recognize that there are folks out there who are diametrically opposed to Dave Eggers, for reasons I don’t quite understand. AHWoSG is one of the best books of the last 25 years, and its stylistic elements were generationally defining, while You Shall Know My Velocity/Sacrament was the sort of smart, not entirely successful novel one might expect from a guy trying to relieve some of the guilt he must have felt for capitalizing on the death of both his parents (and God — Beth, too). And yeah, he’s the poster boy for the sudden derogatory nature of the hipster label, but whatever. Few hate Salinger for half the shitty novels we’ve had to endure the last 50 years, so there’s no reason to hate Eggers for my contemporaries’ and my fourth-rate hackery.

For me, unfortunately, the conceit in What is the What was both its genius and its undoing: A fictional memoir based on the real life of one Darfur’s Lost Boys, Valentino Achek Deng, written in Deng’s voice. And it’s a voice that he absolutely nails. And the novel (or the half I read) is a harrowing, brilliantly written account of the horrors of genocide, life as a refugee, and dealing with the experience of living in the United States. But because it was written in Deng’s voice, What is the What lacked the Eggers whimsy that I’m so ridiculously fond of, as well as his ability to work a keen sense of humor into otherwise weighty stories. And even though you know that Deng will ultimately survive, his story and the plight of the Sudanese is so bleak and depressing that simply picking up the book overwhelmed me with a sense of dread. After 250 pages, I simply couldn’t stomach reading about his life any longer. I wussed out. So, sadly, What is the What will now have to join a shelf with 21 McSweeney’s journals that I haven’t really bothered to read, either (McSweeneys, to me, is like shopping in the natural foods section at the local grocery story: You know it’s not going to taste as good as the additive-heavy foods and, ultimately, you may not eat it at all, but it sure feels good to buy it).

Fortunately, I was able to offset some of that guilt by reading the latest from Dave Eggers’ wife, Vendela Vida: Let the Northern Lights Erase Your Name. In fact, I met Vida, briefly, a few years back in Harvard Square, when she was doing a book tour for her first novel, And Now You Can Go, which turned out to be a somewhat awkward experience when only a handful of people arrived — it was akin to being the first to show up at a party, only to realize half an hour later that no one else was coming. At any rate, Northern Lights is a carefully written novel about a woman named Clarissa who discovers, after her father dies, that he wasn’t actually her biological Dad, so she leaves her fiancĂ© to search for both her real father and her mother’s whereabouts in Lapland (northern Finland). The scenery is gorgeous, the writing is crisp and taut, and the narrative is compelling enough, if not occasionally powerful. Still, while it’s certainly not as bleak as What is the What, it ain’t exactly beach reading, either, though Vida does have a dark wit that surfaces occasionally to add some levity to themes of violence, identity, and discovering ourselves through the past. It’s moving, but it’s a bit too meticulous and thought-out to really tug at the heartstrings.

And I realize this sort of idle speculation is silly, but reading What is the What and Northern Lights back to back, it’s hard not to wonder if Vida has been a sobering influence on Eggers. Judging from Velocity, it’s likely he was already veering toward more serious-minded, somewhat humorless literature anyway, but don’t you just imagine she steered him toward the cliff and pushed him off the precipice? — Dustin Rowles


Zodiac | | Pajiba Love 03/05/07 |



Comments

I really, honestly tried to like Eggers Book of Genius, but I couldn't get into it. After a while I just wanted to smack the shit out of him for his constant and forced cleverness. It isn't that I don't appreciate wit, it's just that the whole thing reeked of pretension, and I found it quite dull after a while.
This newer book does sound good, however, and at some point I will break down and read it.

Posted by: zadzi at March 5, 2007 2:25 PM

You should try Eggers' first novel, "You Shall Know Our Velocity," Zadzi. While parts of it, particularly at first, struck me, too, as rather pretentious, as it got going it not only grew on me but I actually became very heavily invested in the characters' lives (the inclusion of an explanatory section by one of the characters which, among other things, brings to doubt the narrative of the rest of the novel,into the paperback edition is either infuriating or adds a whole new layer of narrative to the thing that is almost _almost_ transcendent).

You guys should try some David Mitchell sometime. I'm currently half-way through his latest novel, "Black Swan Green," which is an absolutely beautiful, funny and poignant little novel (especially after the epic "Cloud Atlas" which preceded it). I'd love to read your thoughts on his novels.

Posted by: Armando at March 5, 2007 2:49 PM

May I suggest for further Lethem reading: Motherless Brooklyn, Girl in Landscape, and Gun, With Occasional Music.
All excellent!

Posted by: debkakes at March 5, 2007 3:46 PM

AHWOSG really moved me, and got me back into devouring books in a way I had not since I was in the 9th grade and read Flowers for Algernon. Despite having a completely different childhood experience, for some reason I identified completely with Eggers and his friends... the scene in the book where Dave and Toph are driving in the car singing Journey could have been my sister and me (with me as Toph). I love Dave Eggers. I want to take him out behind the middle school and get him pregnant.

Posted by: La Femme Nikita at March 5, 2007 5:57 PM

As an alternative to What is the What, the (mercifully) short Beasts of no nation, by Uzodinma Iweala. Just breathtaking, unrelentingly in the present tense, beautifully written, and like I said, short.

Posted by: your neighborhood librarian at March 5, 2007 6:03 PM

I read Motherless Brooklyn when it came out and enjoyed it, but I hadn't read any other Lethem work since. UNTIL I picked up an advance copy of You Don't Love Me Yet (coming in June? maybe--can't remember). Granted, Lethem himself calls this a "profoundly unimportant book." Still, I thought it was not worth the time it took me to read it. I hope that you'll review the book here, because I'd like to hear someone else's thoughts--particularly someone who is a big fan of Lethem's. Make me see what I am missing!

Posted by: bound to read at March 5, 2007 7:56 PM

Eggers recently came to my college and I asked him about the changes he was making in his books (and i haven't read WitW yet, full disclosure) and if he felt that the restlessness in his earlier characters was something he was outgrowing. From what I gathered from his response, it seemed like those characters were an outlet in response to writing in one confined place - literally sitting in a room for 12 hours and writing - and wanting to keep in contact with the outside world, so to speak. But he said that he felt that he beat that horse to death, so to speak, and was moving on to other kinds of plots. Which, I guess, is what the "what" is.

He was a really cool guy, by the way.

Posted by: a at March 6, 2007 1:02 AM

Ugh, that earlier comment was some horrible writing. sorry. remind me to "preview" next time...

Posted by: a at March 6, 2007 1:03 AM

Thanks, Armando, I'll have to check it out. I'm not all that cynical (yet)..:)

Posted by: zadzi at March 6, 2007 1:54 AM

"I recognize that there are folks out there who are diametrically opposed to Dave Eggers, for reasons I don't quite understand"


AHBWOSG is the literary equivalent of having a friend who is in Alcoholics Anonymous and has just returned home from the Peace Corps. Half the people who have to suffer his presence are going to think he is a whiny, self absorbed little bitch. The other half are going to think that he is wonderful and profound. It's the same thing with Dane Cook. Well, not really. But you get the idea.

Posted by: Dave at March 6, 2007 12:13 PM

Armando, "A Heartbreaking Work..." was Eggers's first novel. "Velocity" came several years later and seemed, as Dustin points out, to be a mechanism through which Eggers could absolve some of the guilt and trauma he felt at having parlayed his parent's deaths into literary celebrity.

There is no way one can say this without sounding like a despicable, hyperemotional, hipster bandwagoneer (a thing I really dont think I am,) but AHWoSG is my favorite book. To the first poster, Zadzi, you've just gotta get through the fist part of the book-- in which his mother is dying. Its only included to establish circumstances and inform the rest of the book, but it is more solomn and depressing than entertaining. Get past that part, and the book takes off like a frisbee along the san francisco bay.

I'm currently in the middle of What is the What, and have yet to grow weary of it. I can definitely see Dustin's point though.

I wouldn't have admitted it first, Martin. But, hipster bandwagoneer or not, it's my favorite book, too. I own four copies, just because I couldn't wait to get a copy back before loaning it out to another friend, though I don't think any of them saw the same things in it that I did. I think it was the first book I ever truly appreciated not for the narrative, but for the use of language.

And to Armando above; I read Black Swan Green last year, on Phillip's recommendation. It was one of his favorites of 2006, and definitely an exhilarating read. It reminded me a lot of a novel I read when I was about 15; Robert McCammon's Boy's Life, though I doubt anyone remembers McCammon anymore. -- DR

Posted by: Martin at March 6, 2007 12:16 PM

McCammon's "Wolf's Hour" is one of the best guilty pleasure books I've ever read. And as long as we're talking about books with wit, how about the Fletch series. The movie(s) never happened, ok?

Posted by: carl at March 6, 2007 1:01 PM

I think Eggers is a great writer, but he really shines in his shorter pieces. I agree that the first part of "Heartbreaking Work...." is wonderful, but the book should've ended perhaps about halfway through. I'm not entirely against long works of fiction - some are brilliant, but not many.

Posted by: Samantha T at March 6, 2007 1:25 PM

If you're an Eggers fan, I recommend The Best American Nonrequired Reading series he edits with Matt Groening. Great, great stuff.

Posted by: AM at March 6, 2007 1:55 PM

Holy crap, Dustin, you read Boy's Life? That's a blast from the past. I also read it when I was 16 or so.

Samantha T, Heartbreaking Work isn't fiction, but I still think you could argue it needed some trimming.

As someone with a lot of friends who aspire to write (and write), I think a lot of the backlash against Eggers (but not all of it) stems from simple jealousy. He's squarely in our generation, and he made it big on his own terms. Not many people you can say that about.

Posted by: JMW at March 6, 2007 2:09 PM

In a conversation with a friend last week, she asked me to name my favorite book, period. I read a lot. I usually have two or three books going at once, in a variety of genres. And my response? A Hearbreaking Work of Staggering Genius . Hands down. I have a degree in English lit and a personal collection of roughly 750-800 novels, and AHWoSG reigns supreme. The language, the tone, the sarcasm, the pain...I love it all. I had to replace my original paperback because the spine broke apart. I read the foreword, the afterword, prologue. I quite simply adore this book and just wanted to geek out with the similarly-minded.

Posted by: Nicole at March 6, 2007 4:12 PM

I have read What is the what, I enjoyed AHWoSG
but grew tired of it towards the end...but the real reaosn I am chiming in is to third the motion that Black Swan Green is a GREAT BOOK. I am finding that if I like the sound of it on KCRW's Bookworm podcast, I'm gonna like it overall. Same goes for Here they Come by Yannick Murphy. But oh, David Mitchell must remeber his adolescence perfectly. Which is sad for him but pitch-perfect for us.

Posted by: Theresa at March 6, 2007 5:27 PM

See, I was wondering about whether A Heartbreaking Work...was a novel or not. It's touted as a memoir but reading through it and comparing it with You Shall Know Our Velocity, its "memoireness" (?) strikes me as something of a red herring. It's definitely on my list for the next few months, after Black Swan Green and then some lighter fare.

Posted by: Armando at March 6, 2007 11:01 PM

Oh yes, Armando. David Mitchell is so very, very much better than Dave Eggers. But then David Mitchell is one of the finest novelists ever, and Dave Eggers, while he has his moments, is merely a so-so author with one good book to his credit.

Posted by: dot at March 7, 2007 1:06 AM

I wonder if there's something to wives' literary work subsequently affecting their husbands'work - I'm thinking in particular of Siri Hustvedt and her husband, Paul Auster, whose work has subtly but noticeably shifted as the years have passed.

I have What is the What, and will be curious to read it in light of this critique, but am also adding Vendela to my book list. Thanks! (Finally, please add me as a member of the David Mitchell fan club.)

Posted by: je lis tout le temps at March 7, 2007 5:11 PM

I read What is the What and parts of it are unbearably bleak, but its such a great book, I recommend it. I've been recommending it to everyone I know.

Posted by: mofo at March 8, 2007 8:56 PM

i am a dedicated mcsweeneys online reader, comparative lit major (read as: bookworm!) and appreciator of snobbish humor, but i absolutely reviled a heartbreaking work of staggering genius.
self-indulgent garbage with an absence of narrative flow. it was probably the most disappointing thing i've ever read because my hopes were so high (and with a title like that, how could they not be?)

Posted by: the-ian at March 11, 2007 1:06 PM

Really try finishing What is the What. I agree that it does drag in the middle and I had to push myself to get through it, but finishing it is definitely worth it. I agree with mofo and I recommend that it's definitely worth reading.

In fact, it should be required reading for all of the rich, bitchy teenagers and young adults out there. Put Lindsay and Britney in WITW rehab. It will sober anyone up!

Posted by: suzeeet at March 23, 2007 11:39 PM

Valentino Achak Deng is not from Darfur. Different region, different ethnic/religious group, different war.

Posted by: zorn at April 5, 2007 1:47 PM