web
counter
 

Long Story Short

By Joanna Robinson | Posted Under Videos | Comments (13)



fullsize_4.jpeg

The main reason I’ve gathered you here today is to show you this short film entitled Lazy Teenage Superheroes. You know I’m prone to ramble sometimes, and I don’t want you to get bored and wander away before you get to the video. So go ahead, watch the film. It’s about 13 minutes long. I’ll wait.

That’s pretty great, right? Sure, fine, the acting is rather painful and the dialogue fails to wow, but the effects are fairly nifty considering that the budget was $300. THREE HUNDRED CLAMS? I have shoes that cost more. Frankly, I’d prefer to see more of this than I would any number of comic book adaptations currently in the works. (Especially since X-Men: First Class director Matthew Vaughn described his film as having “a lot of teenage angst. The Twilight girls will like it.” Oh, lord.)

Short films are such an interesting medium, the provenance of film students and wanna be auteurs. And while the lack of studio involvement gives a short filmmaker the benefit of a more pure artistic expression, the shoe-string budget can impose somewhat crippling limits on the quality of a piece. The two ways I’ve seen a short film director work around the budget issue is to either shoot a film that relies heavily on clever dialogue (The Clerks approach), or to get really, truly, bloody inventive.

It’s the inventive stuff that intrigues me. I used to work a lot of film festivals and have seen scads of dreadful shorts, heaps of pretentious shorts, and just a few shiny gems. The shiniest in recent memory is 2007’s Death To The Tinman. This short was director Ray Tintori’s film school thesis, so it’s not entirely devoid of certain pretentious film student cliches, but I’ll be damned if it isn’t highly watchable and creative. So watch it, and then think of all the creativity you have in your clever Pajiban heads and the technology you have on your laptop, or cell phone, or iThingie and ask yourself why you’re not making films. I’d watch your movie.


Joanna Robinson wants the soundtrack from Death To The Tinman to play while she, like, does the dishes or her taxes or yard work and stuff.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



This Film Ought to Be Confiscated. Burned. | Reaction to The Woman | DVD Releases 1/25/11









Comments

Boo!

I don't know what's going on in here but you are too happening of a chicklet to have that nasty 0 staring you in the face.

As for teenager superheroes, I um...er...gotta run now!

Posted by: Cindy at January 25, 2011 7:54 PM

You could at least answer me. We can drive this thing up to 9 in like, three minutes.

Posted by: Cindy at January 25, 2011 8:01 PM

Those both were pretty neat.

Posted by: Rykker at January 25, 2011 8:30 PM

Inventive, cheaply made short films like this make me feel sooooooo lazy.

Also, how terrible is Ratner at his job that he had a budget of $210,000,000.00 and ended up with the turd that is X-Men 3, while those guys had only $300 and ended up with that excellent little film?

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at January 25, 2011 8:34 PM

yeah, i enjoyed the first one. only 300? that's pretty freaking good for 300 bucks.

couldn't see the second one as i don't live in the u.s. but i think i may have already seen it. and if it's that film, it was freaking good too!

Posted by: splinter at January 25, 2011 8:59 PM

Somebody's been on videocopilot.net.

Posted by: HappyGobo at January 25, 2011 9:37 PM

They should show these things in theaters before the feature in stead of the lame trivia.

3 pts for the superscope bong.

Posted by: bradm at January 25, 2011 11:14 PM

Especially since X-Men: First Class director Matthew Vaughn described his film as having “a lot of teenage angst. The Twilight girls will like it.”

He really said that? EPIC FAAAAAAAAAAAIIIIIILLLLLL!

Posted by: Uriah Creep at January 25, 2011 11:30 PM

Ugh, really? That first one was intolerable. I only got to 3:38 before my vagina suddenly filled up with water. Excuse me . . .

Posted by: Lauren at January 26, 2011 12:21 AM

Death to the TINMAN was great!

Thanks for sharing. Most shorts suck. Ive only seen a handful of shorts that are really worth watching.

The Lazy Superhero one was good too. You can tell they only spent 300 bucks but it still rocked.

Posted by: junierizzle at January 26, 2011 2:19 AM

@bradm - Seriously, how great would it be to see a new short film between the previews and the feature at movie theaters? I'd be at the cinema every week instead of lazing at home with my laptop and ... never mind.

Posted by: cinekat at January 26, 2011 5:32 AM

In our local fleapit we get short movies shown before anything else, courtesy of Virgin Media. Always great fun.

Posted by: Limey Bastard at January 26, 2011 6:24 AM

considering that the budget was $300. THREE HUNDRED CLAMS? I have shoes that cost more.

*sigh*

Women.

Posted by: DeistBrawler at January 26, 2011 3:47 PM