web
counter
 

Inception Explained

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Videos | Comments (26)



Inception-South-Park-Insheeption.jpg

I actually found this clip, from this week’s episode of “South Park,” a little annoying. Not because it’s bad, but because it hits a little too close to home. Screw you, Matt Parker and Trey Stone — you’ve reduced something I very much loved into a puddle of its own urine. Inception is smart! And I’m smart for liking it, damnit.

*kicks can*

Why can’t you stick to “Jersey Shore,” and leave us poor pretentious people alone!

(The Daily Beast)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Got Ghosts? | An Evening Comment Diversion | Proportionate Justice Is for Lily-Livered Yellow Bellies | No Cuts, A**hole. I Said: No Cuts









Comments

Because for Trey and Matt, there are no sacred cows. Thats how comedy should be, IMHO.

Unless you wanna get in to the whole Mohammad thing again. They're probably STILL pissed about how Comedy Central handled that last episode...

Posted by: Green Lantern at October 22, 2010 8:38 AM

This clip in a nutshell is why I stopped watching South Park. Matt Stone and Trey Parker are brilliant satirists, but I find their humor annoying when they act like they're above all of it.

Basically they're guilty of doing what they accuse Inception of doing. In other words, if everything is stupid and has no inherent value, why should I care about Matt and Trey's opinion about anything?

Posted by: Tom Brazelton at October 22, 2010 8:39 AM

I like South Park, and I like Inception. That being said, I think they simplified it a little bit. Of course everything seems stupid when you break it down to it's simplest, basest components. Hell, let's try it with South Park:

Four 10-year-old boys swear a lot, make fun of celebrities, politics and pop culture, and make shit jokes, but it's all okay because they have a message about it!

Is that an accurate description of South Park? Yup. Is it an accurate portrayal though. Hell fucking no. Fact is, any work of art can sound stupid if you put enough effort into making it sound stupid. The episode made me laugh as a throwaway bit, but did it make me change my mind about anything? Not really.

Posted by: Jeremy Feist at October 22, 2010 8:52 AM

I'm not one of the people that found Inception clever, so this clip made me fall out of my chair laughing. Great way to start a Friday at work. And I also believe that in comedy nothing is sacred.

Posted by: Danielle Lilly at October 22, 2010 8:56 AM

Reduced to Sub-intellectual Drivel? Reduced????

Not a long trip...

Posted by: Case at October 22, 2010 9:01 AM

Yeah, they pretty much nailed it. I do agree with Tom up there, they don't seem to care about anything, to the point of coming across as ...being so non-comformist that they won't conform to being non-comformists.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 22, 2010 9:22 AM

"Four 10-year-old boys swear a lot, make fun of celebrities, politics and pop culture, and make shit jokes, but it's all okay because they have a message about it!Is that an accurate description of South Park? Yup."

Maybe that was a yup thing to say, but yup doesn't make it funny. South Park, on the other hand, was and is funny.

Posted by: schmerpes at October 22, 2010 9:45 AM

Well, I thought the entire episode was pretty damn funny, one of the better ones they've done in a while (I liked the Jersey Shore ep, but it's an easy, easy target) and I still love Inception like a good Nolan fanboy should. They really did break the film's plot down to it's base, and ridiculed it as a silly fantasy to which people gave too much credit. They're not wrong, but the movie establishes itself as a fantasy* early on, so everything that happens is perfectly fine within the structure of that filmic universe. It is pretty silly of them to attack the film's rules, when it sticks to its rules. All the same, it was damn funny.


* I use "fantasy" and intend all of its meanings, deliberately.

Posted by: RobP at October 22, 2010 9:55 AM

Huh. Not even a giggle.

I mean, I get the "joke" and all. But it just seems...tame. I mean, this is South Park, land of Gay Fish Kanye West, Cartoon Wars, The Super Adventurer's Club and, yes, Mohammed cartoons.

And the best they could come up with for Inception was...stating the plot holes? Something that every jackass with a keyboard and residual "I knew Bruce Willis was dead" syndrome (like Case, apparently) has done since the movie was released? What exactly am I supposed to find so hilarious or insulting about it? This is some weak-sauce Family Guy shit.

Maybe there were better jokes in the rest of the episode or something. But I don't see how this clip is supposed to be all that funny or outrageous, or make me feel less intelligent for enjoying the film.

Maybe the problem isn't the movie or the show, but this idea of smug superiority you folks have in your heads, whee if someone dares question your taste (like in the Jackass 3D saga), you either go on a rampage or fold faster than Steven Segal's deck chair. And that goes for EVERYONE.

Huh. If the parody of Inception (which is saying that the movie wasn't clever) isn't clever itself, does that count as irony?

Posted by: Vermillion at October 22, 2010 9:57 AM

I warned my brother before he got to watch this episode that Matt and Trey really hate Inception and Sharon of all characters is their proxy for the hatred. I still loved the episode and very much enjoyed Inception. The entire episode is more of a send-up of the conceit of Inception than a declaration of the film being horrible or stupid, no matter what Matt and Trey's intent really was.

Posted by: Robert at October 22, 2010 10:01 AM

Whether it's South Park or Inception, the fact is that we're headed to the world or Idiocracy. This happens when no one wants to read anymore and can't tell the difference between good and bad story telling. South Park is funny but not witty, while Inception is just obvious and boring.

Posted by: HeadOn at October 22, 2010 10:10 AM

I enjoyed Inception, I won't lie. It was visually stunning and conceptually new. But halfway through the movie, I realized I was just watching a heist movie. And while it still looked really pretty, it got real boring, real fast.

Posted by: ahamos at October 22, 2010 10:26 AM

STOP confusing "it's" with "its," people.

You are better than that.

Good god. How many times did has it happened in this thread so far? I refuse to go back and count. I just know that I have had several tiny aneurysms.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at October 22, 2010 12:24 PM

The best part of this was the mockery of the music.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at October 22, 2010 12:25 PM

The strangest thing about the South Park video is how close it is to a College Humor video from a few months back. Some of the jokes are literally..word for word pretty much.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmRYtN9xUwg&feature=player_embedded

Posted by: Caillan at October 22, 2010 12:52 PM

Reductio ad absurdum is only funny when done correctly. That is not the plot of Inception, it is what someone who didn't like Inception thinks the plot to Inception is, and for me that renders the argument invalid even if it weren't reductio ad absurdum which is automatically an invalid argument.

Usually, or a few years back, which is the last time I was regularly watching South Park, they were above most things because that's where the opinions of the show rode -- above both sides, arriving at really good objective areas that didn't tow a party line or one side of an argument. This is just the argument of people who didn't like the movie, and that's what annoys me about it. If I want to hear a flat argument like this, I'll watch Family Guy. Only, wait, Family Guy just did an episode where Brian becomes a Republican after finally reading what Rush Limbaugh's actual opinions were instead of what other liberals told him Rush Limbaugh's opinions were, then went back when he realized he just wasn't a Republican at heart. That's sound like more of a South Park episode than this joke does.

I didn't think Inception was cool because it was complicated, I thought it was cool because I read lots of complicated literature and science fiction and therefore understood Inception, allowing me to figure out that Nolan pulled off something really cool that happens to be buried under a mountain of plot. BTW, if I reduce Star Wars down, it becomes: "A farm kid gets into a fight with his dad over religion."

Godfather: "College kid begrudgingly takes over family business."

Casablanca: "Guy runs into ex-girlfriend -- awkward!"

Dune: "Avatar."

Posted by: puppetDoug at October 22, 2010 2:18 PM

I only thought Inception was a clever movie after I read this article:

http://www.chud.com/articles/articles/24477/1/NEVER-WAKE-UP-THE-MEANING-AND-SECRET-OF-INCEPTION/Page1.html

Asinine title aside, the article made me watch the movie in a completely different way. Whether the article is accurate in it's assessment or not, the movie is constructed in a way that it leaves lots of room for thought provocation. This is what pushes it into grade A territory for a movie, for me at least.

Posted by: Socrates at October 22, 2010 2:20 PM

Wow....I've never watched South Park and never felt like I was missing out on a lot. So, yeah, I didn't watch this clip and don't care.

I was confused as hell by Inception, but still thought it was pretty cool.

Posted by: dammitjanet at October 22, 2010 2:46 PM

For the Southpark guys, there are no sacred cows which is how it should be. I think Trey and Matt probably enjoyed the movie though. Making that episode and enjoying Inception are not mutually exclusive. They are satirists. Swift didn't actually eat any babies you know.

Posted by: jesuschrysler at October 22, 2010 5:47 PM

It would have been even better if they had actually seen the film, rather than ripping off much of the episode from the COLLEGE HUMOR parody:
http://www.avclub.com/articles/south-park-creators-apologize-for-borrowing-from-c,46720/

Oops.

Posted by: JLRoberson at October 22, 2010 6:58 PM

you have to understand something. matt stone and trey parker, on a general principle, are smart. not as smart as christopher nolan by any means, but reasonably bright. hell, theyre not even as smart as any of the actors or actresses in this movie, but they figured out how to piss ALOT of people off by making this, but they didnt succeed at pissing off the cast, crew, and makers of Inception. so in the end, THEYRE the failures, for not being able to stir up enough controversy about this episode. remember the avatar episode? that was a few weeks or so before avatar was released and even before critics had seen it. at the time, avatar was going to be just another cool sci fi movie, not what it turned into, an example of how the media blows up shitty movies, and i mean shitty in every sense of the word. anyways, people thought the episode was going to hurt the films progress. in my opinion, they shouldve made this episode before Inception.

Posted by: Taylor Kozakar at October 22, 2010 8:48 PM

"Everyone is in favor of saving Hitler's brain. But put it in the body of a great white shark and ooh! Suddenly you've gone too far!"

Okay, not the same show, but the point still valid, I think.

Like anyone, I think South Park's social satire is funnier when I agree that whatever they're lampooning is dumb (Jersey Shore for example ... or republicans). But if they make fun of something I like or think is important, it makes me uncomfortable.

They've said for years that they were equal opportunity insulters, and they make no bones about that. I can't think that the Terry Shaivo parody episode is great, but the global warming parody episode is misguided. They're both poking fun of national topics, and they both take the absurdity of one side or the other to a ridiculous extreme. That said, there's nothing wrong with liking one episode more than another.

Honestly, my favorite South Park Episodes tend to be the ones where the kids are just being themselves, and there's no broader social or cultural theme to the episode. More and more, it seems like they end up doing themed shows. The "Inception" show, the "Facebook/Tron" show, the "Family Guy" show, etc.

My favorite shows are the ones like when they got ninja weapons and accidentally stabbed Butters in the eye. The "boys will be boys" episodes tend to be the funniest, I think, and have the longest shelf life.

Posted by: Leftylad at October 22, 2010 11:46 PM

I agree with Leftylad. The non-themed episodes tend to be more consistently funny. The theme episodes can hit and miss. I was laughing at this episode, especially when they pulled out the goat or sheep to spoof the BRHAAAAAAMMM. The best point made here was "Making that episode and enjoying Inception are not mutually exclusive. They are satirists. Swift didn't actually eat any babies you know." Exactly, their "takedown" of inception felt a little halfhearted, probably because they didn't really hate it. It's amazing that they can produce/write/voice a show for so long and still manage a few episodes a year that are great.

Posted by: e at October 23, 2010 1:09 AM

I love both Inception and South Park. That said I was disappointed that the episode didn't have any shots of the van falling off the bridge for two straight hours. When Leo said "thoughts of my dead wife sometimes manifest as trains" I couldn't stop laughing.

Posted by: j at October 23, 2010 2:55 PM

I liked this episode a lot more before I found out they basically ripped off about 90% of it from the CollegeHumor parody. It was good that Matt and Trey publicly acknowledged it and apologized, but I find the only way to truly make a parody is to watch the original fucking source material and they didn't even bother to do that. Lame.

Posted by: RJ at October 23, 2010 3:57 PM

Well I can't belive that people who get paid to make jokes made fun of something I like. I'm gonna get all butt hurt and accuse them of being pretentious and plagiarist.

This is what you sound like right now...

Sorry boys and girls, but when you get so caught up in your own sense of self importance that you can't take a potshot at something you like, well then YOU are the punchline to this joke. Congrats Trey and Matt did it again.

On that note. Inception was the best movie of the year. Not because that plot or dream within a dream schlock was so groundbreaking. Just because it was a well acted well filmed movie. Yet somehow I still watched this south park episode and laughed my ass off... Probably has something to do with it being funny. Life's good when you don't take it too seriously.

Posted by: Blank at October 25, 2010 10:52 AM