web
counter
 

Christina Aguilera Shakes Her Ass. A Lot.

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Videos | Comments (32)



burlesquireaguilera.jpg

For those of you who have been seeing trailers for Burlesque — starring Cher, Stanley Tucci, Christina Aguilera, Kristen Bell, and the dude with the funny name — and sort of hoping it’d be more than just a big honking musical, well, I’m sorry. It seems fairly apparently now that it’s going to be a big song-and-dance number kind of movie. Really big.

Here’s the first full-length clip released from the movie, of Ms. Aguilera singing “I’m a Good Girl,” shaking her ass and spreading her legs. That’s actressin’, folks.

(Via Movieline)









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Brother, Can You Spare a Dime? | Get the Hell Away from Me | New "Doctor Who" Clips From Series 5 | Get Your Coat, Love, the Doctor Is In









Comments

Why would anyone think that a movie called Burlesque wouldn't be anything other than a big-ass musical?
And ain't that the kind of actressin' as what comprises a big-ass musical?

Posted by: Rykker at November 11, 2010 9:44 AM

Christina better be careful or those wonderful body piercings will get snagged in her bustier.

Posted by: Kballs at November 11, 2010 9:55 AM

Anybody else annoyed by how much this looks like Chicago? And isn't Stanley Tucci sick of giving people makeovers?

Posted by: valerie at November 11, 2010 10:00 AM

Burlesque may have just killed all the pro-musical good will acquired by Once, Across the Universe, and A Mighty Wind. Who wrote this tripe, anyway? Oh, the guy who did the score to the musical episodes of Buffy. Draw your own damn conclusions from that. I'll go with mediocre TV composer carried by excellent campy performances shouldn't be doing songs and lyrics for a feature length musical.

Posted by: Robert at November 11, 2010 10:01 AM

i'm with Rykker on this one, i'd actually be pretty disappointed if the whole thing isn't done in song and dance. and, across the universe was garbage...pretty looking garbage, but definitely on the bad end of musicals

Posted by: Sinnh at November 11, 2010 10:11 AM

Hmm. Subtle. Could possibly do with more Bowler hats and black eye-liner.

Posted by: Ballymena Bob at November 11, 2010 10:12 AM

Anybody else annoyed by how much this looks like Chicago? And isn't Stanley Tucci sick of giving people makeovers?

Posted by: valerie at November 11, 2010 10:00 AM

Mmm Hmm. I thought I smelled Rob Marshall.

Posted by: greer at November 11, 2010 10:17 AM

On the plus side, it turns out Christina can get through a song without all those annoying riffs and unnecessary high notes.

Posted by: Cadet at November 11, 2010 10:37 AM

I thought this movie came and went already. You mean it's still coming? Damn, this is worse than those Krull promos I used to see for 7 years.

Posted by: BWeaves at November 11, 2010 10:40 AM

I'm just a girl who cain't say no.

Posted by: BWeaves at November 11, 2010 10:42 AM

Hmm. Let's see what we have here.

* Christina Aguilera, well-established but relatively minor diva in the gay pantheon
* Cher, who isn't quite the mother goddess of said gay pantheon (that would be Judy Garland), but who is damned close.
* dragariffic costumes
* brassy songs
* saucy dance numbers
* Cam Gigandet showing lots of skin
* makeovers
* Rob Marshall

Yup. I smell shameless pandering to white urban gay men. Perhaps the producers are hoping that clips of this movie wind up in video bars all across the land, just like "Mommie Dearest".

Posted by: jeem at November 11, 2010 11:02 AM

I certainly make no attempt to speak for the entire gay community, and i'm sure there are some of us queers that are dreading this. I am not one of them.

I can't wait. My gay bits are all a-tingle for this mess. Yes, they're pandering to me, and yes, I'm eating it up with a goddamn spoon. Singing, dancing, wigs, and Cammy Baby. I'll be having drinks before it and will be a tipsy gay spectacle, and if you're surprised by the musicalness of it, offended by the overt homosexualness of it, too bad. Don't go. Every couple years Hollywood makes a big gay wreck of a movie in a shameless attempt to swallow some of the famous "Disposable Gay Income," and I'll gleefully fall for it.

And as for being pandered to, isn't that what every movie does? The sad, sappy RomCom panders to the woman that wants to believe that a magical romance can take root thru the postal service, transcend time and space, and end up with the manly yet sensitive ideal husband making her breakfast in bed in the perfect house while her perfect 2.6 children slumber peacefully in the next room. The movies that blow shit up pander to the men that want to leave their dreary desk jobs, blow shit up and partake in general badassery. The sci-fi nerd flicks pander to those that want to be on a spaceship decked out in their steampunk finest. Perhaps I really do want those around me to burst into impromptu song and have us all know the dance steps. Imagine how much more fun going to the bank would be. Lets not all be shocked and appalled at the pandering.

Now, if you'll excuse me I have to go shine my thigh-high patent leather tap boots and find my Bowler hat. It's probably under my pile of wigs and eyeliner.

Posted by: The Gay at November 11, 2010 11:57 AM

Oh, The Gay, I lurv you.

Posted by: coveredinbees at November 11, 2010 12:03 PM

I really want to like Aguilera, because when you ignore all the tramp and glitter, wow that voice. So powerful.

It's just that everything else is so very distracting about her.

@The Gay

Comments full of style, humor, and flip pride. You're living the stereotype man! And might I say doing a damn fine and entertaining job of it.

You're absolutely right, if the pandering hits the right spot, why not enjoy the hell out of it?

-Frob

Posted by: frobme at November 11, 2010 12:52 PM

They keep trying to sell this sleazy ho' and it just aint happening. Is she even relevant?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 11, 2010 1:00 PM

People. We are not digging deeply enough for metaphoric antecedents. Burlesque is Forty-second Street. Warner Baxter: "You're going out a youngster but you've got to come back a star!"

Posted by: Jerry Kenney at November 11, 2010 1:05 PM

I ... it's so SPARKLY.

Posted by: Anna von Beav at November 11, 2010 1:06 PM

1. CHER! But with the Cher! I love Cher!

2. DO NOT DISRESPECT the Buffy musical episode.

3. I do so love Judy Garland and if that makes me a gay man then sign me up!

Sidebar: I have a Judy Garland as Dorothy magnet in my cubicle. I imagine the day when someone asks my why so I can say, "Because they don't make one of her singing The Man That Got Away".

4. Like Frob, I think Aguilera has a killer voice, I'm just not that enthused about her song choices (except for that Beautiful song, I'm not made of stone) so a non-trilly performance sounds alluring.

5. This apple is clearly not the McIntosh advertised on the bag it came in.

6. I will see this on Netflix because camp requires either a. co-conspirators or b. the privacy of your own home for cackling.

7. I am adding thigh-high patent leather tap boots to my requests of Santa. Right after the request to have all of my wire hangers replaced with wooden ones.

8. Sinnh's evaluation of Across the Universe is more than fair.

9. The Rob Marshall aspect gives me pause. I HATED Chicago. It was like the editor was a whippet on speed. There's nothing, nor should there be, quite like a musical where you can't actually watch the dancing. I'm not a Gere fan, but if he took the trouble to learn to tap dance show him in a full body shot!

10. Because it bears repeating: CHER!

Posted by: Mrs. Julien at November 11, 2010 1:37 PM

Everything The Gay said.

Except I'm not gay.

And I loves me a big-ass musical, and I hope they don't screw it up like Chicago and make all the musical numbers either imaginary or some kind of dream sequence.
~

Posted by: Meander at November 11, 2010 2:57 PM

Mrs. Julien,

The Buffy musical episodes were cute TV one-offs. A feature length musical needs a hell of a lot more, especially with Genie in a Bottle taking the lead. The lyrics in that song are atrocious (false and dropped rhymes, sometimes back to back), and I haven't heard anything to indicate they get better from other the trailers. If you're not a brilliant lyricist, you shouldn't do score and lyrics. We're not all Sondheim, and even some of his best work has co-writers involved to make it more accessible. Partnering with another writer isn't a crime and often produces a far stronger product.

I think only the most diehard Buffy fans would claim that every line of every song in the musical episodes was pure poetry and every note just the perfect choice. It was camp sold by a cast of actors willing to let go and have some fun at their own expense.

Posted by: Robert at November 11, 2010 4:57 PM

I appreciate the input of whoever it was who got her to put the kibosh on the wrecking ball melismas. I also find it interesting that getting into the guise of a burlesque performer basically constitutes a 'makeunder' for her. 'Send In The Clowns' indeed.

Posted by: Jo 'Mama' Besser at November 11, 2010 6:13 PM

Speaking as a huge burlesque aficionado, I like The Crazy Horse Paris' choreography better. It is simpler but therefore more elegant, and check out those kicks! Ms. Aguilera does, however, sing "I Am A Good Girl" very well.

Innocently NSFW:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlsGRHmBwNQ&feature=related

I'm looking foward to seeing this movie but am worried it will be only to see how badly they get burlesque culture wrong. I feel this will be to Burlesque what "Whip It" was to Roller Derby. Oh well, Hollywood.


P.S. I saddened that I live in country where I have to warn that a video like this is NSFW and most "Jackass" style stunt videos are not. What is wrong with us?

Posted by: Darth Darko at November 11, 2010 8:06 PM

Dude, it's going to be Showgirls 2: Electric Boogaloo. Don't even start with me.

Posted by: figgy at November 11, 2010 9:21 PM

As far as I can find, Rob Marshall had nothing to do with Burlesque, but in any case, I think this would have been a better movie with Neil Marshall.

Posted by: Uriah Creep at November 11, 2010 9:29 PM

I was expecting this movie to become a huge guilty pleasure for me, but now... not so sure. The singing fell completely flat for me and the choreography was only so-so and... there's not nearly enough artful stripping for burlesque, at least not in that act.

So... meh. I was thinking about seeing it in theatres but now I'll wait for Netflix for sure.

Posted by: Nat Kittyface at November 11, 2010 10:57 PM

If Ginger Rogers were alive (she was the original Roxie Hart) to see this, she'd be horrified.

That being said I MIGHT POSSIBLY download this. It looks like Chicago with more vadge in it.

Posted by: Jessica at November 11, 2010 11:49 PM

Yeah, figgy, you're probably right. AWWW hell!!!!!! I know you're right! But can't I at least get drunk and go see it on a Sunday night after the Saints game with my Burlesque dancer friends and have a sad laugh?

Posted by: Darth Darko at November 12, 2010 4:30 AM

well I'm just happy Christina Aguilera isn't yelling her way through a song, and actually shows she can bloody sing...
I do think this kind of movie is a smart choice for her, it requires her to do what she does well (sing and preform) and a minimal amount of acting that she could do with out looking ridicules (at least I hope so)

Posted by: yifatshaik at November 12, 2010 5:40 AM

I was not impressed. I hate the MTV-style short cuts; a couple of long 2-second cuts, then most of the time it's 1-second cuts, climaxing at several cuts/second for a while. And then the cycle repeats. Come on, lets see the dancing of the actors, not of the camera angle.

Posted by: Anonymous coward at November 12, 2010 6:08 AM

I am not a huge supporter of Christina Aguilera, I enjoy a lot better Britney Spears along with Lady Gaga ! They're all just bad duplicates of Madona anyways !

Posted by: disabled dating at November 26, 2010 2:39 PM

Very usefull blog. i will follow this blog. keep up the good work.

Posted by: trex 700 at January 9, 2011 7:15 PM

Almost all I can point out is, I don't know what to really say! Except naturally, for the excellent tips which have been shared within this blog. I'll think of a zillion fun approaches to read the posts on this site. I think I will finally take action employing your tips on those things I could never have been able to handle alone. You had been so thoughtful to let me be one of those to learn from your practical information. Please realize how considerably I am thankful.

Posted by: zero friction marketing at February 19, 2011 8:55 AM