
The First Ever Pajiba Mulligan!
Van Wilder 2: The Rise of Taj / Dustin Rowles
Author’s Note: This is my second stab at reviewing Van Wilder 2: The Rise of Taj. If you’d like to see a critic attempt, and fail miserably, to take a reasonably enjoyable conceit and run it into the ground, you can see the original review here. What can I say? When you try something inventive, every once in a while it blows up in your face and ruins a day already marred by a shitty film. I got too fucking cute with it. The following is a more straightforward attempt — though, I’m now a little embarrassed I’ve wasted so much time on a film that certainly doesn’t merit it. Cheers.
The original Van Wilder may have been the then low-point of the National Lampoons films, at least until 2003’s Dorm Daze came along. It was, after all, a flick that featured Tara Reid as a “brainy reporter,” Curtis “Booger” Armstrong as elder statesman, a bulldog masturbating into an éclair, an ex-lax milkshake that elicited trash-can diarrhea, and the lowest-rent cameo money can buy in Erik Estrada. But for all its misogyny, gerontophobia, and lame gross-out humor, it still had Ryan Reynolds, whose smarmy sarcastic charm made Van Wilder at times downright amusing. Reynolds, whose only discernible talent, it seems, is stealing scenes in otherwise horrible films (Waiting, Just Friends, and Blade: Trinity, to name a few) may actually be the one guy who had to potential to extract a laugh out of Van Wilder 2: The Rise of Taj. Too bad nobody bothered to cast him.
Without the charismatic Reynolds, the tiny, addled brain of director Mort Nathan (who wrote Boat Trip, for fuck’s sake) can’t even piece together a goddamn gross-out joke respectably. In fact, the only prank the entire film attempts is to feed a large show-dog some Viagra, but even then, the big dog/little dog fornication is left to the imagination of the viewer up and until we are blessed with a rainstorm of ejaculate. Good times, if you like the sort of scatological comedy a three-year-old kid could produce with a few minutes around the toilet trainer.
The film opens in an airplane, with Taj on his way to England, where he’s set to carry on his father’s “Sultan of the Sheets” legacy as a member of the Fox and Hounds, a racist, classist fraternity to which Taj’s father purportedly belonged. It is on that airplane that Taj attempts to join the scalded genitalia mile-high club by dousing his penis in hot-sauce while a generic, large-chested blonde gets his rocks off, a particularly unfunny scene with little bearing on any of the rest of the film, though the same could be said of most of Van Wilder 2’s scenes.
Once Taj arrives, Pip Everett, the Earl of Grey, informs him that his acceptance letter contained a typo — it should have said he was not accepted into the Fox and Hounds, a typo that doubles as the film’s one running gag. Funny one, eh? Taj is instead shipped off to the Barn, a ramshackle dormitory that houses an assortment of other losers, who found their way to the Barn via the same typographical error.
Among the key members of the Barn are Seamus (Glen Barry), whose sole talent appears to be head-butting; Gethin, (Anthony Cothens), who has mathematically calculated that Camford University has the highest number of attractive women willing to fuck pathetic geeks; Simon (Steven Rathman), who is completely silent during most of the film — as it turns out, he has an 11-inch penis that pulls most of the blood from his brain, rendering him speechless; and finally, Sadie (Holly Davidson), whose face is given about one-tenth of the screen time given to her cleavage. Oh — she also has a cockney accent, which you can listen to discuss the intricacies of fellatio as the camera lingers between her breasts. All thoroughly well rounded characters, to say the least. No matter, really — they’re only there as sounding board for Taj’s increasingly lame sexually-themed puns, penned by a first-time writer (David Drew Gallagher) whose most notable contribution to pop culture was as “Nerdy Frat Guy #1” in a 1993 episode of “The Fresh Prince of Bel Air,” something I’m sure provided all the credentials he needed to subject 2,500 movie screens to his ruminations on the female anatomy (“Sunny side up on the way to the butt”).
Anyway, Taj, discouraged with the apathetic state of his housemates, decides to form the Cock and Bulls, a Revenge of the Nerds-inspired fraternity, assembled to compete against the Fox and Hound for the coveted Camford Cup, which is a goddamn trophy where all the film’s humor apparently resides, permanently sealed within its brass confines, where it will remain as punishment to film critics who poorly execute silly conceits.
Conveniently enough, Taj is also a teaching assistant, charged with instructing his housemates on English history, which he does by way of a London tour bus and a paintball re-enactment of some French and English war, which is about as inspired as a Napoleon Dynamite/Larry the Cable Guy debate on the merits of luncheon meat (man, I loved that fake ham-like substance with hunks of cheese built in — whatever happened to that?). The head T.A., Charlotte Higginson (Lauren Cohan) isn’t a fan of Taj’s 10th-rate John Keating teaching style, however, and says as much up and until he wins her over in a poetry reading, in which he strings together song names from Green Day, R.E.M., and U2 (no, seriously — for a full five minutes. I actually felt my brain leaking from my ears.)
The problem, of course, is that Charlotte is betrothed to Pip, and Pip is a wanker, which means that Taj will have to win the Camford Cup and somehow humiliate Pip in the process to attain Charlotte’s eternal affection and win the respect of … whomever the fuck it is that doesn’t respect him. I’m not really spoiling anything that isn’t spoiled the second you walk into the theater by saying that he does so, during the final fencing competition, which features absolutely nothing original, enjoyable, or worthy of keeping you awake (the two other attendees to the screening I was at both left 45 minutes into the film to go do something more pleasurable, like bathe with a hair dryer).
Van Wilder 2 is a bad film, which is obvious enough in the fact that not even Tara Reid makes a return appearance, choosing instead to do an incredibly low-budget bowling film featuring Robert Carradine. But, goddamn — it doesn’t even try. It’s not just a terrible film for reasonably minded folks — surefire morons wouldn’t find it entertaining, either (and if you’re that surefire moron who did, I offer my apologies and hope that someday you find a friend at the AAMR). I mean, seriously — how hard would it be to satisfy its core audience, made up of largely drunk college kid(s) who have to coordinate brain cells to make it to the theater on time? How difficult would it be to throw in a few topless women jumping on trampolines and a couple of English fraternity guys who puke Stella out of their nose? Hell, Jimmy Kimmel does that shit five nights a week, and God knows that he hasn’t even fully evolved yet — his knuckles still scrape the ground when he walks. Clearly, however, Mort Nathan and his amoebic-sized intelligence and prokaryotic sense of humor haven’t even made it that far on the evolutionary scale.
Hell, a movie like this doesn’t even warrant worst film of the year, because to anoint it as would be to call attention to it — it’s like mocking Kevin Federline. You’re just feeding the motherfucking beast, when it ought to be left to die, alone, in a hot desert, neck-deep in sand, forced to listen to its own music until its dreads melt in the sun and seep slowly into its skull, until the cranium warps and folds, falling into the oral cavity, where it trickles down into the lungs and rots until the buzzards and centipedes eat its remains. And that ought to be the fate of Van Wilder 2.
Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He is currently halfway through a three-year ‘sentence’ in upstate, NY, where he lives with his wife. You may email him, or leave a comment below.
Turistas | | Nativity Story, The
Comments
But...Kal Penn! I love him! Why is he making me sad :(
Posted by: Tam at December 2, 2006 12:41 AM
Look, I know roles are few and far between for those actors who don't fill the WASPy shoes most of Hollywood seems to look for. But Kal? What in the holy hell are you doing in this crap? I had a crush on you.....and it's fading. Sigh.
Posted by: Daphne Wilson at December 2, 2006 12:59 AM
For anyone who doesn't know: AAMR = American Association on Mental Retardation. According to their website they shall soon be AAIDD = American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
Posted by: jbrader at December 2, 2006 2:06 AM
"...how hard would it be to satisfy its core audience, made up of largely drunk college kid.."
Most brilliant and fitting typo ever.
I don't know that Ryan Reynolds made 'Just Friends' watchable.. I barely made it fifteen minutes. Even if he was in this, I wouldn't watch it. (I may check out 'the Namesake', however. )
Posted by: Mara at December 2, 2006 2:25 AM
Tam & Daphne, I'm with you, Kal must have owed someone a favor or needed serious $$$ to do this piece of shit. IMO, the first VW was downright AWFUL, with or without Ryan Reynolds. The semen in the doughnut gag literally made me gag as well. Talk about an all time low for comedy.
However, when I heard about the sequel, I didn't care less until I saw "Harold and Kumar go to White Castle" and realized that Kal Penn could ACT. I'm thinking, "He won't really do this crap VW sequel, will he? Please, say it ain't so!"
Unfortunately, it is so. Hopefully, Kal will redeem himself in "The Namesake".
Posted by: Brie at December 2, 2006 3:21 AM
Awww, don't be so hard on yourself. I liked the first review.
Oh, and "Camford"? As in "Cambridge + Oxford"? *groans* Even after the two reviews I can't believe the writers of the film were so unimaginative they'd go for that as "generic British university name".
Posted by: MJ at December 2, 2006 10:55 AM
Oh come on! I liked the first review too. It had a certain Borges-esque quality to it (if Borges had grown up in Arkansas instead of Argentina, I suppose) that made it quite enjoyable. Unlike this film, aparently.
Posted by: Armando at December 2, 2006 12:39 PM
I third liking the orig. Man, I knew we were critical but this is taking it to new heights!
I promise to shut up about errant diphthongs next time.
Posted by: ranylt at December 2, 2006 1:29 PM
that last paragraph is poetic. i still think its too good a fate for either monseuir federline or this film, though.
Posted by: the-ian at December 2, 2006 2:30 PM
Your last paragraph is wonderful :)
This film's jokes look lame as Lucifer:
British fairy: "Let's settle this like my ancestors did."
Taj: "You want to exploit me economically?"
Is this what a crappy screenwriter's first-year course in Post-Colonial studies lead to?
Posted by: KissKiss at December 2, 2006 4:58 PM
I haven't seen the first Van Wilder, but it's can't be worse than National Lampoon's Last Resort. That may actually be the worst movie I've ever seen, and boy howdy I've seen a lot of bad movies.
Posted by: T at December 2, 2006 11:33 PM
i have to agree, i loved the first review, but of course i have to (sigh) admit that i lived in fort smith with my ex-wife (named missy, no less) for a brief stint in the late 90's. i never sold used cars, however. on the subject of the film, i can think of nothing to add. it sounds dreadful, to say the least.
Posted by: tim at December 3, 2006 12:41 PM
What is up with Kal Pen's career? He went from starring in a movie (Harold and Kumar), to having a non-speaking part in the last Superman movie.
Why cast him if you're not going to let him talk? They could've picked anyone up and set him in the same part.
I thought he was really funny and it's a shame he had to submit to being in Van Wilder II in order to be permitted to talk.
Posted by: ecp at December 3, 2006 2:50 PM
Your crack about the AAMR was truly odious. Sure the film sucks, and I understand that you want to get a little sassy, but come on: insulting retarded people might just be the only form of humor lower than Van Wilder 2. And, you know, your first review.
Posted by: fth at December 3, 2006 4:18 PM
Back in my days doing script coverage, Van Wilder came across my desk.
It was torture reading it, and I gave it as much negative coverage as I could, but they still made it. Needless to say, I did NOT subject myself to the finished product, but the previews and ads were enough to confirm for me that they had NOT improved it since my reading of its original script.
I thought the preview of VW2 was actually rather funny, but not enough to actually plunk down the dough to see it.
I covered a lot of scripts back then -- so many that occasionally a new release will look vaguely familiar to me and it will bother me until I realise that I covered the script back in 2002. I rarely want to see the films made of those scripts -- there have been exceptions, of course -- Traffic and Iris among them...
Anyway. This review reminded me of those days when I had to find new and interesting ways to say a script sucked donkey dick... and failed. Your "mulligan" is fine -- and yes, the first attempt was a little confusing, until I realised that you would NEVER subject a GOOD film to a review written by this Bob Chase doppelganger fellow... Besides, knowing the original source material as I do, it isn't very difficult to imagine the sequel is just as bad or worse.
We'll get over it.
Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at December 3, 2006 4:49 PM
I thought "beer bungee" was funny, but I'm not risking actually going to the movie to find out for sure. I think I got all I needed from the preview. And the review(s).
(And I thought the other review was funny, but I have a somewhat beer-bungee sense of humour.)
Posted by: elsworthy at December 4, 2006 9:30 AM
Great review, blah blah... but the one thing about this film that truly bugs me, is that we don't have fraternities here in England! Why did they write that into the story? I don't understand!
Posted by: fran at December 4, 2006 1:18 PM
Fran, you can't let a little thing like the truth get in the way of a script.
Posted by: Josfan at December 4, 2006 2:52 PM
Hey Fran,
You're asking this about a Hollywood (American) studio film? These are the people who made U-571, for Chrissakes. Remember that screamer? Where they have the Americans cracking the Nazis' secret code?
Posted by: Canadian at December 4, 2006 6:56 PM
True, true... but I alway though Wikipedia was so accessible!
I can honestly say I took one look at U-571's trailers and promised myself I'd never watch it, mainly due to Bon Jovi's presence. I've saved myself from a lot of things that way.
Posted by: fran at December 5, 2006 4:00 AM
I agree, there's no way the original Van Wilder is worse than National Lampoon's Last Resort.
Think about this: both Coreys in a dick measuring contest. Now be glad you never saw that movie.
Posted by: The Anti-Corey at December 5, 2006 6:37 PM
Poor Kal Penn. Probably had it down in some horrible contract that if asked he would have to do a second one. I heard in an interview that most of his early auditions ended with "Where's your accent? And your turban?" It's a long way to the top I guess...
I'm just waiting on the Namesake and Harold and Kumar go to Amsterdam. A few friends of mine saw a sneak preview of the Namesake and said it was wonderful.
Posted by: thelizard at December 9, 2006 2:09 PM
It's time to address the only worthwhile thing from this entire crapfest movie...the soundtrack. It's pretty good. However, it omits the catchy rap song from the airplane scene in the beginning...anyone know the name/artist?
Posted by: AJ at December 13, 2006 7:48 PM
Why even bother, you could have reviewed something else with more intellectual ompf then this standard straight to video fare...at least some films pretend to take themselves seriously and deserved to be mocked...why torture yourself with this tripe, so you can prove how "bitchy" this site is?
Posted by: Gina at December 17, 2006 4:09 PM
fuck u it wasnt that abd of a movie
Posted by: sam at March 28, 2007 1:50 AM
[quote]It's time to address the only worthwhile thing from this entire crapfest movie...the soundtrack. It's pretty good. However, it omits the catchy rap song from the airplane scene in the beginning...anyone know the name/artist?[/quote]
I am also wondering what this song is called can anybody please tell me. Thanks.
Posted by: Andrew at April 7, 2007 2:03 PM
http://students.sessions.edu/?Xanax "> xanax online [url= http://students.sessions.edu/?Xanax ] xanax online [/url]
Posted by: herbal xanax at April 11, 2007 5:31 PM
Peace in the Middle East is obtainable with US and The European Union intervention
Posted by: Ass Nice at April 18, 2007 6:00 AM
Abortion should be, should not be kept legal
Posted by: XRumer at May 2, 2007 5:15 AM
Agree with a flat tax system
Posted by: foot secretary sex at June 9, 2007 6:53 PM

