web
counter
 

rav3.jpg

Pajiba’s Underappreciated Gems

Eat or Die

Ravenous / Ranylt Richildis

Underappreciated Gems | May 7, 2008 | Comments (40)


Is Ravenous really underappreciated? It may be at large, but I suspect it’s wormed its way into the hearts of many Pajibans, so I may be wasting my breath and your time. This one’s on the edge, but I’d rather err on the side of gushing and make double-sure it’s in everyone’s DVD collections or rental queues where it belongs. While Ravenous barely pinged the North American box office when it hit our shores in 1999, you’d be hard-pressed to find a horror geek, or a fan of Guy Pearce or Robert Carlyle, who hasn’t already stewed in this movie’s viscera. It’s got cannibalism — and Pearce and Carlyle — and pre-allegations Jeffrey Jones rocking his kindly authority figure — and Neal McDonough flexing his inner Arian — and Ojibwa lore — and jagged mountain vistas — and an unforgettable Michael Nyman/Damon Albarn score that chitters and plinks and dances — and virile direction by Antonia Bird, that reel-goddess who might finally have new feature film coming out (with promise written all over it).

Ravenous is a period horror piece, a genre that’s difficult to pull off without stumbling into Hammer-esque camp. Events take place in 1847, during the Mexican-American War, when “Continentalism” (the American ambition of subsuming Mexico and Canada into the United States) was still a miasma obscuring the view of Reality. Capt. John Boyd (Guy Pearce) has just been decorated for bravery by his regiment; the problem is, he only managed to infiltrate and capture a Mexican camp because he played dead on the battlefield and was dragged behind enemy lines on a body cart. His superiors know this, but feel a court-marshalling won’t fly with the men; they dispose of Boyd and his ersatz medal in a remote Sierra Nevada way-station to wait out the rest of the war. Boyd is haunted by a coward’s guilt, and Pearce — one of today’s canniest actors — is a convincing vehicle for the character’s self-loathing; he avoids eye-contact with others and mumbles his speech without the defining inflection of self-esteem. He can’t look in a mirror without recalling his drop to the ground in the pitch of battle, or the horror of being crammed into a cart, pressed under the bodies of his dead comrades, his commander’s blood seeping into his mouth.

Fort Spencer is a snow-ragged yawn in the middle of nowhere, inhabited by an afterthought company: Col. Hart (Jeffrey Jones), their barely competent leader; Knox (Stephen Spinella), an inebriated excuse for a medic; Cleaves (David Arquette), who wanders around in a peyote-scented cloud; Toffler (Jeremy Davies), a chaplain who cringes and whines like a fair externalization of Boyd’s cowardice; and Reich (Neal McDonough), the coward’s polar opposite, a bellicose young yahoo with a face that could cut glass. Each of these soldiers is off his rocker in his own peculiar way and needs to be propped up by Martha (Sheila Tousey), their Native American servant, and her brother George (Joseph Running Fox). Boyd’s entry into their fray barely stirs the air; the men are as isolated from one another as Fort Spencer is isolated from the nearest California outpost, and they only seem to share something akin to camaraderie when the pipe or the bottle is going around. Boyd is resigned and accepts his tour like a world-weary penitent, relieved he won’t have to make friends dear enough to spot the shame crawling under his skin.

The atmosphere livens at the Fort when a stranger (Robert Carlyle) is found outside the officers’ mess on Boyd’s first night, frozen and starved. The men bring him inside, treat him back to life, and listen to a harrowing récit: the distressed Colqhoun had been traveling with a group of settlers who got lost in the mountains at the outset of winter. They took shelter in a cave and, after their rations ran out and their livestock and pets had been eaten, resorted to the obvious. As Colqhoun tells it, their first meal was a “servant” named Jones who died of starvation and made good steaks while Colqhoun was out collecting wood. When Jones had been gnawed to the marrow, hunger attacked the survivors anew — only now their hunger was different. “It was severe … savage,” admits Colqhoun. They picked one another off for food until Colqhoun fled the cave and wandered into Fort Spencer. Col. Hart immediately orders a search party for the survivors. Hart, Boyd, Reich, Toffler and George set off to find the cannibal camp, with Colqhoun as their guide.

That’s more set-up than I’m usually wont to offer, but I’m not sure how to pimp the real merits of Ravenous otherwise. To get to the bones of the movie is to unearth a few spoilers in the process. Fuck it — spoilers ahoy. It’s not that the movie’s charm rests on plot twists, anyway. It should be obvious to viewers what Colqhoun’s really up to, and it’s only after he lures his prey to the cave that Ravenous becomes Ravenous, and the human smorgasbord is laid out to tempt us, not with its gory, fatty morsels per se, but with tense survivalist drama followed by a lingering, close-quarters game of cat-and-mouse between the unapologetic cannibal and his reluctant protégé. Wait — that’s not quite accurate. It’s only after Toffler suffers a compound fracture on their way to the cave, and wakes up to the sensation of Colqhoun licking his wound, that the bits and pieces of plot and theme rattle their way to the surface and begin to click at you like crab-hands. Then again, only the village idiot could miss what’s coming; if the movie’s title doesn’t give it away, the film’s opening scene of officers inhaling bloody steaks pinned by the camera’s eye probably should have tipped you off. The point is that, once the action reaches the settlers’ cave, there’s no more denying that Bird’s gone and flown straight into the taboo’s nest.

As Colqhoun chases his food around a mountainside to the rhythms of Nyman and Albarn’s inimitable score, something happens to Carlyle’s eyes: they become hard little Charlie Manson nuggets in his face, electric with madness, signposts of his unlikely strength and ferocity. The Wendigo lore that feeds the film’s horror is fully exposed in Colqhoun’s expression and gestures — in his satisfied gnawing at warm human bones. A First Nations’ variant on the vampire myth, the Wendigo (according to one of several traditions — the one the film’s chosen to use) is a man who, after tasting human flesh, grows addicted to the infusion of vigor that comes with ingesting the lifeblood of others. The script points out that the myth hails from the North of the continent, but harnessing it to tell a tale of the American West is metaphorically natural. Some of you may have thought all that prattle up top about the film’s Mexican-American War setting was gum-flappage that I planted in this retrospective to fill up space. Not so. The backdrops of Continentalism and colonial expansion amplify the cannibalism trope and darken the movie’s already charred tones. Granted, using cannibalism to satirize imperial greed isn’t unique to Ravenous, but few films have ever done it better; it often takes a foreigner’s eye to read the guts of our nastier historical beasts, and Bird and her mainly British crew (a nation that knows a thing or two about colonial plunder) don’t shy away from hard truths.

It begins with Martha: “You give yourself,” she explains to Boyd. “Wendigo need more, more. Never enough. He takes, never gives.” A statement like this coming from a First Nations woman in a movie about cannibalism and Westward expansion can’t help but have a double meaning. Gluttony for the flesh is an image for a larger kind of gluttony — the kind hinted at in the opening scene in the officers’ mess, and the celebrating of territorial victories over steaks swimming in blood. Nations grow stronger through colonialism like the Wendigo grows stronger when he eats another man. And if there were any doubts about this uncomfortable underlying theme, Carlyle rams it home late in the film when his character talks about Manifest Destiny. “This country’s seeking to be whole,” he tells Boyd. “Stretching out its arms, consuming all it can.” The satire sparkles in Carlyle’s eyes and the metaphor is complete. Boyd stands in for all European-descended Americans, catching his own Wendigo lust by proxy back in the cart when another man’s blood trickled down his throat; some Wendigos consciously consume with guilt-free avarice, but anyone caught in the colonial machine winds up being complicit to a degree. So watch Ravenous knowing that there are two sides to every proposition; Boyd’s official bravery was born in a craven moment, and winning the West wasn’t bloodless, no matter how cherry patriots try to paint it. Films that open with a shot of a fluttering US flag usually go one of two ways: they celebrate the American mystique or they vex it, and Ravenous vexes it beautifully with shiny gore, dark humour, and some fine young cannibals that stick to the memory.

But all the subtext in the world is ultimately neither here nor there. This movie deserves promotion for cinematic reasons alone. It’s the literal horror that makes Ravenous what it is, and its particular tang of wit, and the collection of characters Bird and her screenwriter, Ted Griffin, have set out on the landscape, and the dramatic landscape itself, and that haunting soundtrack which almost seems to be laughing at us. There’s a hue and tone to Ravenous that’s difficult to describe, but once you’ve watched it, it’s like you’ve felt the frozen creek Reich bathes in, breathed in Cleaves’ dopey cloud, and tasted a bowl of man-stew yourself. This movie stimulates most of your senses, and makes everything about it seem three-dimensional and present. Ravenous is a rare beast: a smart, witty, gruesome, and beautifully constructed film that defies categorization, yet comfortably wears the Horror label, delivering where it needs to, and then some. And it wouldn’t be half of what it is without Pearce and Carlyle doing some of their best, most memorable work against a memorable background.

Ranylt Richildis lives in Ottawa, Canada. She can usually be found sneezing in college libraries or dropping chalk in lecture halls, but she’s somehow managed to squeeze in a film or two a day for the last decade.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



DVD Releases 05/07/08 | Movie Snacks









Comments

when "Continentalism" -- the American ambition of subsuming Mexico and Canada into the United States -- was still a miasma obscuring the view of Reality

No, no, we're still totally doing that. Haven't you been paying attention to our choice of chief executives?

Thanks for this review, RR -- I've spotted the film on the channel guide a number of times and found the premise intriguing, but I've never seen it. So now I will.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at May 7, 2008 1:16 PM

Oh, God. I can't believe I ate chili for lunch.

Posted by: AllGussiedUp at May 7, 2008 1:30 PM

Ha ha, good thing it was tofu, vegitarian chili! It's reviews like these that make me thankful that I gave up red meet for the new year!

Posted by: AllGussiedUp at May 7, 2008 1:31 PM

I can't think of another actor that could pull this role off as well as Pearce did. His acting chops are unbelievable. The tone of this movie really reminds me of The Proposition.

Great review, RR. I can't imagine people having a fit over this one. But I'm open to surprise.

Posted by: boo at May 7, 2008 1:35 PM

I just saw this a few months ago and liked it a lot. Guy Pearce is such an interesting actor to me. He's capable of roles that have some physicality to them, but he imbues them with a world-weariness that's always fascinating. And obviously Carlyle is great at playing the psychopath; his antics outside the cave, as Boyd and Reich explore deeper and deeper, were just so creepy and suspenseful.

The music, also, was really well done. It was almost jaunty, but with a twisted edge, perfect for this kind of Deadwood-except-it's-a-horror-movie movie.

Posted by: Todd at May 7, 2008 1:44 PM

Great choice, Ranylt. I've recommended this one to friends for years and have been planning on re-watching it again myself. Great review, made me remember why I liked it so much.

Posted by: Rob at May 7, 2008 1:45 PM

Yeah, and that meat ad up there? Not pretty.

Posted by: boo at May 7, 2008 1:49 PM

Yes! Yes, yes, yes, YES, YES!

One of my very favourites. The score is, of course, insane and wonderful. I've been intending to watch this movie all week... the DVD is sitting on my desk right now! Clearly I'll have to watch it tonight.

He was licking meeee!

Posted by: Lannie at May 7, 2008 1:51 PM

Can we talk about the part where Colqhoun was coming after someone with a knife and the guy throws his gun at him instead of, oh, I don't know, shooting him? Because that was fantastic.

Posted by: Cara at May 7, 2008 2:00 PM

Fantastic review, Ranylt! This movie always makes me feel slightly dizzy for some reason, but it's still one of my favorites...

Posted by: Melissa at May 7, 2008 2:16 PM

I hated this movie when I saw it. Not so much that it was poorly made, but that the premise was so incredible and I didn't feel like it had much of a payoff. However, this was in my younger and more impressionable days. You raise an interesting point with the subversive digs at colonialism and such.

Okay, Ranlyt, I will give it another gander. But if I don't like it, you're stew. But at least you'll be a tasty stew. You don't get to be this fat without learning how to use thyme and paprika.

Posted by: insertclevernamehere at May 7, 2008 2:31 PM

loves, LOVES this movie. I'm always making people watch this when i hear they haven't seen it. Funny enough most of my horror buff friends are made really uncomfortable by it.

Posted by: bookslave at May 7, 2008 2:53 PM

Saw it when it first came out on video, I enjoyed it, tho it wasn't great. I thing Guy Peirce is a great actor.

Posted by: Nerf at May 7, 2008 2:57 PM

Ranylt, your praise for a good film is much more enjoyable than your pretentious attempts at skewering a bad one. I can almost forgive your half-assed review for "The Mist" for just reminding me of this movie. By the way, pajiba is not very funny anymore. What happened? You are all becoming smug.

Posted by: B-rant at May 7, 2008 3:02 PM

something happens to Carlyle's eyes: they become hard little Charlie Manson nuggets in his face, electric with madness, signposts of his unlikely strength and ferocity

No way I'm watching this. I'm still recovering from Carlyle in 28 Weeks Later. Enticing review but it'll be another year until I'm ready to see Carlyle chomping on some flesh again.

Posted by: Aura at May 7, 2008 3:33 PM

Not funny anymore? Really? I happen to like PajibaLove, and many of the Eloquents have their moments. Maybe there should be a comment diversion or "clip show" column with our best moments in it? (But seriously, TK and his zombie horde are no laughing matter.) Excellent review Ranylt, now I just need a night when LadyHelmet's not around!

Posted by: lordhelmet at May 7, 2008 4:29 PM

Jeez, B-rant, what a backhanded "compliment." And I wouldn't sling "smug" around like that until I took a good look in the mirror first.

ANYway -- I logged on just to say: YAY! I love this film! You have repeatedly demonstrated impeccable taste in semi-obscure genre gems, particularly horror.

Aura: I wonder what occurred to make this a motif in his career?

Posted by: be right back at May 7, 2008 4:34 PM

A bowl of man-stew is my preferred movie recipe.

Posted by: Lauren at May 7, 2008 4:44 PM

I've watched Pearce since Neighbours and Crowe since Romper Stomper. Two great Australian actors sublime
together in LA Confidential. If Pearce is somehow not as "famous" as Crowe now is, he is all the more endearing and precious to me because of it. great actor!

Posted by: andrew at May 7, 2008 5:16 PM

Oh yes!! This movie is also in our collection of "what we show friends who stumble into our house and want to watch a DVD". Everyone who does finally join the cool kids loves it as well.

And the stew does look delicious on screen. I usually end up making some the next day but it never looks quite like his recipe. I kinda wish I had a cauldron to make it in too. Stew looks sexy in a cauldron.

Posted by: Becky Tri-Tip Goddess at May 7, 2008 5:38 PM

"BOURBON NOOOOOOOOW!!!!"

Posted by: chris meier at May 7, 2008 5:38 PM

Oh, and we've also had to buy it a few times over. One time we had just purchased the DVD after misplacing our previous copy, left it behind at the theatre, tried to call the management to see if it was turned in but no dice. We felt happy that somewhere, someone was watching it for the first time and hopefully digging it.

Posted by: Becky Tri-Tip Goddess at May 7, 2008 5:42 PM

I've watched this movie three times and I still can't decide if it's genius or madness.

And I mean that as high praise.

Posted by: alone in the dark at May 7, 2008 5:48 PM

I normally hate horror movies, as sensless violence gives me nightmares, but I did enjoy this one. I appreciated the social commentary that went with the gore, and it's rad that the woman ends up being the only one with any sense, instead of being the first one hacked up à la Roth.

Posted by: Agente Provocatrice at May 7, 2008 7:46 PM

No, B-Rant is right... this is a pretty smug place. Don't get so defensive, embrace the NPR-loving, Barack voting, black-frame glasses wearing, library frequenting, coffee drinking smugosity that is Pajiba.

Posted by: I Am The Greatest at May 7, 2008 9:12 PM

Ravenous? An underappreciated gem? Seriously? Personally, I thought it was found in the dictionary under "meh".

Posted by: moogles at May 8, 2008 12:15 AM

This movie came out when I was in the 7th grade. I remember talking to my math teacher, who I had a crush on, about it and him saying it was very weird. I didn't watch it until years later very late one night on HBO. As Alone In The Dark said, it's hard to decide whether this movie is just crazy or genius. Both probably. Either way, I remembered not wanting to eat steak for a while after watching it. The music that plays at the end still gives me chills.

Posted by: B at May 8, 2008 12:16 AM


fucking fantastic review.

i know i gave you some minor shit over your review of "the mist", but you captured the tone and intent of "ravenous" perfectly in this review.

i have never really understood the haters of "ravenous"...thought it was well directed, well-paced, score was awesome, acting and casting was phenomenal...

anyway, any of you pajibans who haven't seen "ravenous" need to check it out. i myself do, about 4 times a year...

Posted by: idiot dentist at May 8, 2008 12:43 AM

This is one of my "forbidden delights" movies, along with "Dead Man" and a few others. My kids absolutely refuse to watch with me (so far) but I will lure them in. Guy Pearce is amazing (note to Kevin Costner---THIS is what you should have been doing in Dancing with big doggies, dipshit!!! this is called REALLY ACTING!!!!), and Robert Carlyle plays a madman like few others. Its like the Donner Party on acid. Hunker down with a nice six-pack of cold beer and a nice meaty pizza or burger (extra rare, of course) and enjoy!!!

Posted by: dammitjanet at May 8, 2008 9:50 AM

I'm de-lurking after what seems like a million years of reading pajiba to express my absurd love of this movie. I saw it back when horror movies still scared me sh*tless (granted, zombies in the night are a very real possibility when climbing into bed) and it's had a special place in my heart for a) the gorgeous setting, b) the amazing score, c) people eating, d) Robert-f*cking-Carlyle, sexy pants people eater that he is. It's one of only a handful of movies that I would take to the "deserted island."

I'm especially ecstatic about Ranylt being the one to grab this gem out of obscurity (sure, maybe not to you lot, but I can only name two people that even know what I'm talking about when bringing up this movie). While I enjoy everyone's reviews and style, Ranylt's has to be my favorite. Her writing is so full of rich imagery and a special kind of flow that I'm instantly immersed and lost in. Thank you so much, RR for sticking it out even when some folks get their panties in a twist about your reviews. It's something I've never quite understood...

Posted by: SZ at May 8, 2008 12:19 PM

I apologize for being a dick, Ranylt. I get a little testy without my vicodin. Perhaps I am one of those losers who wishes they were writing the reviews. I should just save some of that bitter, self-loathing attitude for the creators of these films, not the reviewers. Still, I would like to see some more blasting of bad movies. Why not have an overappreciated section on films? You know, crap like "There Will Be Blood", "Titanic", "Crash" etc.

This may not be exactly what you had in mind, B-R, but....ask and ye shall receive:

http://www.pajiba.com/hellboy.htm

--RR

Posted by: B-rant at May 8, 2008 3:08 PM

Um... listen, Ranylt, I hope this doesn't affect our friendship but...

I've never seen this movie.

I'll fix it, I promise!


I'm so confident this movie was made just for you, I'll gamble our bond on it and wait to hear you rave post-view (that is, if insertclever hasn't potted me into a stew by then--I don't know enough about his film proclivities yet). It'll also convince you McDonough could make the perfect Captain America! --RR

Posted by: TK at May 8, 2008 4:53 PM

Wow, that's such a good idea: Robert Carlyle as Charles Manson. I wonder what RC is doing lately? Haven't heard much from him since that Hitler film.

On the commentary track, someone notes Carlyle is the smallest of the actors, but definitely the scariest. Think of that scene in the woods, and later by the cliff. He wouldn't have to do anything -- I would rather throw myself over the edge than be caught by him.

Yes, this is a fantastic film, and you have to see it. The sound track is the best I ever heard. Just listening to it frightened the crap out of me.

Posted by: Janis at May 8, 2008 9:20 PM

I'm also delurking to express my love of this movie. Although I personally always define it as more of a dark comedy to people. But maybe it's just me who laughs maniacally through half the movie. Some people say I'm morbid.

Oh and the score, my god the score, it's amazing. It sets the perfect tone for the film.

Posted by: KC at May 8, 2008 10:41 PM

f I'm not mistaken, didn't Jeremy Davies play Manson in a tv movie not too long ago. There really dosen't need to be another movie on that guy. Ugh, but they are making another one called Manson grls with Lindsay Lohan. I just can't, I can't.

Posted by: B at May 8, 2008 11:57 PM

I haven't seen this movie in years, but I'm definitely going to seek it out and get reacquainted with it in the near future. The only thing I remember from last time I saw it is Neal McDonough's face...it was the first film I saw him in, and I remember thinking, "No way that guy really looks like that." Turns out he does! Too bad his acting isn't nearly as interesting as his physical appearance.

Great review, RR.

Posted by: Jen at May 10, 2008 3:39 AM

Oh, I LOVE this movie and it made my day to see it deemed an "underappreciated gem!" This is the movie that really hammered Robert Carlyle home as one of my favorite actors (along with "Plunkett and Macleane"). I could write an essay on the music alone. I've tried to describe this movie to friends before as, "Well, it's a kind of horror/western/comedy."

If you have the DVD, definitely watch it with Robert Carlyle's commentary.

Posted by: Noelegy at May 10, 2008 9:33 PM

P.S. "Run."

Posted by: Noelegy at May 10, 2008 9:34 PM

i always loved this movie, though it wouldnt be nearly as great without that insane score. i need to go to the old movie-dungeon and dust this one off again. congrats once again for reminding me about why i love this site.

Posted by: smatt584 at May 14, 2008 3:33 AM

Posted by: songs at October 15, 2008 11:46 PM