free counter with statistics Citizen X | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

citizenx.jpg

Pajiba’s Underappreciated Gems

There Are No Serial Killers in the Soviet State

Citizen X / Ranylt Richildis

Underappreciated Gems | February 18, 2008 | Comments (36)


In 1995, HBO aired one of the most elegant American movies ever produced about a child-killer: Citizen X. Being a made-for-TV effort, Citizen X suffers from a few tell-tale symptoms, like conspicuous exposition, sentimental strings, and textbook sequencing, but these appear in doses small enough to be swallowed comfortably — and while they may remind us that we’re watching a cable TV movie, that recollection also prompts us to notice how much better these aspects are handled here than elsewhere. When North American viewers think Great Serial Killer Films, our memories usually trot out big, brash numbers like The Silence of the Lambs, Manhunter and (for a lot of you, if not for yours truly) Seven. It’s a shame the foreign and independent treatments on the same theme have been banished to a sort of underclass; some of the best serial killer portrayals or stories can be found in films like George Sluizer’s original 1988 The Vanishing, or The Cold Light of Day with Richard E. Grant, or the infamously ragged Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer or the incomparable Peeping Tom. Citizen X may have been produced just inside the awning of the US corporate media system, but it was made before HBO earned its mane as one of the lions of the American entertainment world, and it squats a very wee potato indeed next to its better-known feature-film counterparts.

Based on the real-life crimes of Andrei Chikatilo, Citizen X is about one of the most prolific serial killers on record (with 52 known victims), who was lucky enough to flourish under a government which believed that serial murder was “a decadent Western phenomenon.” When the mutilated bodies of children and women began surfacing around Rostov-on-Don in 1982, Soviet officials pulled a classic Amity-Mayor move, and put ideology before investigation. They refused to admit to the public that such an abnormal psychology could emerge from the homogenous body of an indoctrinated collective. A forensic pathologist with no real investigative training was assigned to track down Citizen X, a process that took nearly a decade, thanks to poor resources, an inadequately trained police force, and an overall atmosphere of listlessness. And thanks to a backroom fraternity of ambitious officials, the investigation into the Rostov sex murders was further hampered by a bureaucracy that would have ruffled even Kafka. In its interpretation of events, Citizen X examines the paranoia of a government — over losing its control of the population — as much as it underscores the general paranoia that gripped educated professionals and factory workers alike in the USSR’s final decade.

The film’s made-for-TV pedigree allows for a few more stumbles that are noticeable but not unforgivable — not when they’re set against the film’s strengths, at least. Some might criticize Citizen X for the “accent” presentation of local speech (the international cast, which includes an Irishman, a Canadian, a Swede, two Brits, and a whole bushel of Hungarians, speaks English at each another with Russian swallows); or we could roll our eyes around a little over the typically officious American rendering of Soviet life and society. But these generic flaws are dead moths of inconsequence next to what really makes Citizen X worth seeing: its gripping story, its quiet, haunting atmosphere, its steely performances, and the arcing trajectory of the friendship that develops between the forensic investigator (Stephen Rea) and the Colonel (Donald Sutherland) who batters against the political wall that stands between them and a closed case. Regular readers may have tweaked by now onto my incapacitating allergy to Hollywood sentimentalism, but the sentiment in Citizen X, generated by the relationship between the over-sensitive investigator and his over-understanding superior, has an authentic sweetness to it that works for me. That sweetness is welcome and almost necessary, because it balances out the raw reality of the child deaths that are allowed to multiply over the years, and the helplessness of Rea’s character as he watches the corpses stack up.

Rea, as Viktor Burakov, evolves over the course of the movie from a diffident lab-coat in a blue-tiled morgue to an unstoppable force of justice with a native genius for crime-solving. Forbidden to contact foreign organizations like the FBI for advice, Burakov teaches himself the basics and, over time, convinces others to practice painstaking forensic methods, like walking the grid of crime scenes and overturning every last stone in a pasture, looking for scraps of junk that might be linked to their killer. Rea’s performance (as usual) is quiet and weirdly pregnant with a fullness that transmits his character’s frustration and deep kindness. Sutherland, as his compassionate superior, is slightly cartoonish, but only slightly, and with good, thematic reason: as a character, he’s a hybrid, negotiating the tipping-point between Burakov’s reality in the field and that of his own, somewhat detached life in the political ranks he manipulates on Burakov’s behalf. Those ranks are populated by even more cartoonish and brazenly Kafkaesque figures, who exist in a bubble of luxury and privilege; they brag that their own families have no need to ride the electric trains on which Citizen X appears to be fishing for victims. They are apoplectic ideologues whose party principles are only guises to deceive others and delude themselves — and they are represented best by Joss Ackland’s obnoxious Comrade Bondarchuk. Ackland is one of those unsung That Guy actors who crops up thanklessly again and again on our screen and deserves to be a household name — his corrupt Zuid Afrikan diplomat is the only thing I remember about Lethal Weapon 2, and in Citizen X, he’s once again high art as the villain-VIP who hectors Burakov into a ball on a chair, and muddies the investigation for his own personal and political ends.

A performance-rich film that includes Rea, Sutherland and Ackland is already designed to satisfy, but Citizen X just keeps bringing it: Imelda Staunton has a small role as Burakov’s wife, and Max von Sydow turns up as a wily psychiatrist who writes a profile on Citizen X based on crime-scene evidence and instinct. The most memorable thing about the movie, though — along with Rea’s character and the film’s moldy powder-blue and gray palette — is Jeffrey DeMunn as Chikatilo. DeMunn has turned up in guest TV roles in everything from “The X-Files” to “Law & Order,” and like Ackland, he’s a staple, go-to actor for a certain type of performance — in DeMunn’s case, it’s often (though not exclusively) the muted, sinister everyman. DeMunn’s serial killer is like a cold wet rag pressing up against your skin; you sense his difference, but you can’t put your finger on what makes him distasteful. He looks like your chemistry teacher but he smells like rot. He’s the awkward guy in the corner with zero charisma, a pathetic shambler who blends into the walls and lures children and disenfranchised women into nearby forests to let his inner monster out all over them. And yet, in these killing scenes, he never throws off his drab little everyman shell for a second, because that’s really all he is: a bullied, timid, socially clumsy passerby in a trenchcoat and a graying beard who hosts a sexual dysfunction and a fatal lack of conscience. There’s nothing exalted or even unusual about DeMunn’s Chikatilo. There is only the real skin of a real predator, with no exaggerated power to mesmerize à la Hopkins, and no contrived blandness à la Spacey. DeMunn is brave enough to show the viewer what the real victims of sex killers see in their last moments: a face, a cock, a knife, and a wince of anguish. His portrait of the wounded regular is one of the most convincing portrayals of a serial killer out there; he is neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic, which is a near-impossible line for an actor to straddle — and it’s rarely seen in serial-killer movies, whose actors usually reach histrionically for one extreme or the other. If you’re a completist when it comes to these kinds of thrillers, DeMunn’s performance makes Citizen X a can’t-miss.

Ranylt Richildis lives in Ottawa, Canada. She can usually be found sneezing in college libraries or dropping chalk in lecture halls, but she’s somehow managed to squeeze in a film or two a day for the last decade.


Say What One More Time | Lost: The Economist



Comments

This is by far the best most under-appreciated HBO movie ever made. That is all.

Posted by: ciji at February 18, 2008 12:45 PM

Oh God, Ranylt...I haven't seen this since when it first came out when I was 15, and there are scenes in this movie that still haunt me (Chikatilo and his female victim in the woods springs to mind). Great great serial killer movie.

Posted by: Julie at February 18, 2008 12:59 PM

Funny thing...I first read about this movie on a videogame magazine, 8 years ago. At first I didn't care, but a couple of years later, I remembered the article and decided to read it again and give the movie a chance (at first I was kind of dissapointed by the TV-Movie thing, but I decided to leave out my prejudgments). It was simply awesome, specially the perfomances. I'm glad this is part of Pajiba's underappreciated gems

Posted by: Radlum at February 18, 2008 1:03 PM

Oh hells yeah, I remember being riveted by this little gem.

I was thinking about posting a "poor Joss Ackland" paragraph, before I read the whole column and saw that Ranylt has done that for me. Same for Jeffrey DeMunn; you won't recognize his name, but all of you will know him the second you see him on the screen. Everybody's great in this.

This "little" movie is well worth putting in your Netflix queue if you haven't seen it. Everything Ranylt says about it above is right on.

Posted by: Jerce at February 18, 2008 1:05 PM

I started out being interested about this particular movie and/or the review, but then you distracted me by mentioning "Seven," which got me thinking of Josh Hartnett, and wondering why his entire emotional range just goes from "thinking really hard" to "taking a shit." Homeboy looks constipated in every scene he does.

Continue being relevant, I'll just be over here.

Posted by: marebear at February 18, 2008 1:15 PM

"And yet, in these killing scenes, he never throws off his drab little everyman shell for a second, because that's really all he is: a bullied, timid, socially clumsy passerby in a trenchcoat and a graying beard who hosts a sexual dysfunction and a fatal lack of conscience"

Thank you Ranylt. That was perfect. For years I have railed against the Silence of the Lambs lobby and Hopkins hamming it up. This is a truly chilling film that doesn't need lampshades of human skin to terrify. And I think we can all agree that if Neil Jordan never did anything else in his life, his role in introducing Stephen Rea to the movie world would be enough. As an aside, I sat next to Stephen Rea on a plane once and he was an absolute gentleman.

Posted by: PaddyDog at February 18, 2008 1:23 PM

Consider it Netflixed.

The admission that you didn't care for Seven is almost hurtful.

Posted by: TK at February 18, 2008 1:28 PM

The most neglected serial killer movies are the ones about homosexual pedophile serial killers. The one about John Wayne Gacy was made in Canada for TV but starred Brian Dennehy as Gacy and BOTH of the TV movies about the Atlanta homosexual pedophile serial killer Wayne Williams and which were made in 1985 and 2000 actually argued that the wrong person had been convicted.

Jeffrey Dahmer had only one reference in a character search for a film made in 2002 while Ted Bundy had eleven films made about him.

Posted by: OscarTamerz at February 18, 2008 1:35 PM

TK:
You're online? Isn't this President's Day? I was sure your employer would be shuttered and you would not grace us with your presence until tomorrow demanded an escape from the tedium of work once again.

Posted by: PaddyDog at February 18, 2008 1:36 PM

PaddyDog: I'm taking a quick break from sitting around in my sweatpants, drunk off my ass, playing Rock Band and watching Deadwood on DVD.

Posted by: TK at February 18, 2008 1:43 PM

I'm Netflixing it as we speak.

I liked "Seven" when I first saw it, but catching parts on cable in recent years -- especially Pitt's ridiculous playing of the final scene ("Oh, what's in the boooooxxx?!") -- has diminished my appreciation. But "Silence of the Lambs" -- come on. Sure, it doesn't have to take lampshades made of human skin for something to be scary, but that don't mean lampshades of human skin ain't scary.

Posted by: JMW at February 18, 2008 1:52 PM

Serial killer blah, blah, yeah I'll Netflixit. I ain't here to talk about that shit. I'm here, to talk about those paragons of democracy...yes, our beloved, presidents.

I'll state for the record RIGHT NOW, Martin Van Buren was the money President, anyone who doesn't agree should get beaten to death with a rolled-up first draft of the Constitution.

It was all in the Muttonchops, hoss.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 18, 2008 2:19 PM

TK:

Can I come over?

Posted by: PaddyDog at February 18, 2008 2:26 PM

...you distracted me by mentioning "Seven," which got me thinking of Josh Hartnett...
Posted by: marebear at February 18

The admission that you didn't care for Seven is almost hurtful.
Posted by: TK at February 18, 2008 1:28 PM

If thinking about Seven makes you think about Josh Hartnett, well, that's your thing; but do you maybe mean some different actor whose "emoting" bears an eerie resemblance to the grimaces of constipation? And maybe that actor's name has an amusingly thematic rhyme, like "Bad Shit"?

And TK, how come you didn't catch that? Are you dru...oh. Never mind.

Posted by: Jerce at February 18, 2008 2:26 PM

I had forgotten that the USSR considered mass murder a "decadent Western phenomenon".
I visited Soviet Russia in 1988, during the brief shining moment that was Glastnost. During arranged meetings with Communist party members, I was told that they did not suffer from the "drawbacks of Capitalism" (their words). Things like serial killers, rapists and drug problems simply did not exist there.

Just like there are no homosexuals in Iran, right?

Posted by: numchuck at February 18, 2008 2:31 PM

JMW:
I have to disagree. The lampshade of human skin made me laugh out loud when I saw the film. I haven't read the books so I don't know if it was in there or not it just seemed silly. I would have been terrified by other uses for the human epidermis but the lampshade was a little twee. HOWEVER, I am prepared to give it a retrospective pass since it's presence set up one of the best lines in 40 Year Old Virgin

Posted by: PaddyDog at February 18, 2008 2:33 PM

you distracted me by mentioning "Seven," which got me thinking of Josh Hartnett

Pourquoi? (Mallory: It's French, I think. Alex: Congratulations -- now you're illiterate in two languages.)

Very satisfying review; the fun thing about Underappreciated Gems is that you get to be more analytical and inquisitive about the depth and structure of a film you've seen more than once and don't have overriding time pressure to review quickly. If only someone can give that treatment to The Hottie and the Nottie in the coming years. In the meantime, Citizen X is going in the queue.

Best little-known fact about The Silence of the Lambs: Chris Isaak as SWAT team member #3 when Lecter escapes.

As an aside, I sat next to Stephen Rea on a plane once and he was an absolute gentleman.

So he did or did not adjust your volume and tuning?

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at February 18, 2008 2:33 PM

Numchuck: yeah, what a good thing we've moved past that and Russia is now a healthy democracy with due process, open media and.....never mind.

Posted by: PaddyDog at February 18, 2008 2:36 PM

what a good thing we've moved past that and Russia is now a healthy democracy with due process, open media and.....never mind.

Posted by: PaddyDog at February 18, 2008 2:36 PM

--------------------------------------------------

BAM!

What would Jack-Off Smirnoff say....mmmmm: "In Soviet Russia, KGB would tell you to go to the plaza, now, mafia buries you IN plaza! *hilarious canned laughter*

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at February 18, 2008 2:41 PM

B'slim: I'd respond but I have to go drain some polonium out of my teacup. It's so annoying when that happens.

Posted by: PaddyDog at February 18, 2008 2:59 PM

Looks like I'm going to have to pick this one up. I think the difference though between this and that (aside from this being a movie, and that being real), is Chikatilo. He just has one of the most horrific faces. Regardless of his status (or lack thereof) as a serial killer... sweet fucking Jesus. Close your damn mouth.

Posted by: Lola at February 18, 2008 5:07 PM

thank you for this review, Ranylt. i had no idea about this film.

my only exposure to this story was when i first moved here and a Cold Case Files type of program here did a 3-part on this case. very few people old enough to remember that time had actually heard of this case (Afghanistan was the big story of the day), and for the younger generations it was quite a shock to hear about it. too bad i'll probably never get to see this film much less show it to my friends.

numchuck- the term i still hear often is "rotting capitalism".

i have always thought that Spacey's "motivation" in the final scene was not his character taunting Pitt's character, but rather Spacey himself taunting Pitt- "C'mon, act! That all you got?!"

Posted by: causaubon at February 18, 2008 5:10 PM

Oh man, I LOVE this movie and I've been thinking about it on and off for years. I gotta sign up for that Netflix all the kids are talking about.

I remember watching this at the house of my boyfriend's cousin, he lived with 2 other guys in their 20s and it's where we'd all go to smoke pot or drink beer. And as the movie played, eventually this rowdy household got quieter and quieter as each member and all their assorted hangers-on one by one got sucked into the movie and just quietly sat, watching it.

The ending, man. "Don't turn around."

Posted by: june at February 18, 2008 5:17 PM

I live two hundred miles from where Ed Gein lived (original skin-lamp shade guy), fifty miles from where John Wayne Gacy lived, forty miles from where Jeffery Dahmer lived, and 10 miles from where a guy (who lived 2 miles away from my grandfather) 1) killed a teenage boy, 2) hung him up on his garage door opener and cut his limbs off, 3) shoved his brain down the garbage disposal, and 4) threw the rest of his body onto the county roads in various garbage bags. Somehow, I don't think depraved serial killers should be a form of entertainment for me. However, I saw this when it came out because Donald Sutherland was in it, and I enjoyed it.

The best thing about this movie is it introduced me to Stephen Rea. If I hadn't seen this, I wouldn't have seen The Crying Game or The Butcher Boy.

Posted by: Three-nineteen at February 18, 2008 7:30 PM

I've always thought movies about serial killers glamorized them, made them seem brilliant when all they really are is conscienceless, choosing the only easiest victims. They're pathetic. I like Silence of the Lambs OK for what it is. Have heard of this one, never seen it.

Posted by: Slash at February 18, 2008 10:02 PM

Three-nineteen you might want to look into moving...

I heard about this movie awhile ago and it got filed under "Always meant to see it but never had the time". I think I'll make time now.

Posted by: Kay at February 18, 2008 11:16 PM

Never, ever heard of this one before, but after this review and some of the comments which have followed, I will be making a determined effort to track it down. It doesn't hurt that I'll pretty much watch anything with Donald Sutherland or Max Von Sydow in it (although Judge Dredd nearly cured me of the latter affliction).

Posted by: Dill The Devil at February 19, 2008 4:23 AM

Sorry for posting twice in a row, but this only occurred to me after I hit 'Post Comment'; how about, as a counterpart to the Underappreciated Gems articles, doing a series about critically-revered movies that the Pajiba reviewers actually think are undeserving of the praise? Dustin's already eviscerated Citizen Kane in the past, the LotR franchise has been thoroughly kicked in the teeth, Ranylt doesn't rate Seven - what else is out there that Pajibans think the rest of the world is wrong about?

Suggested title for the series: Pajiba's Sacred Cow Slaughterhouse.

Posted by: Dill The Devil at February 19, 2008 4:27 AM

I know this is kinda late, but I really just needed to say that I hated Seven. Absolutely hated it. It was boring, it was cliche, it was entirely and utterly predictable. The instant the photographer tried to snap photos, I knew it was him. I knew the wife was dead as soon as the truck came up the road. The only thing remotely suspenseful was the chase scene in the rain, and that only because I was wondering if they'd actually shoot Brad Pitt (the character, not the actual actor, haha). So there.

Posted by: Cuno at February 19, 2008 4:19 PM

Serious impact in this movie, considering I have seen it once years ago on HBO itself and yet instantly recognized your still frame, and could recall the entire thing in detail reading your review. Seven for instance was obviously much better produced and Morgan Freeman seems instantly credible in any role; but as much as I like Spacey I'd have to say this relatively small time actor eclipsed him for a main character; I remember at the time thinking how desperate and sad he was, but completely undeserving of pity. Just...pathetic.

Posted by: Frob at February 19, 2008 5:17 PM

Run, don't walk, to your Netflix queue. This movie is fabulous.

Posted by: Fabiola Thing at February 19, 2008 6:10 PM

My parents never screened what I watched on TV, so if this came out in '95, I saw it when I was 12. I was a pretty mature viewer (I had definitely seen "Silence of the Lambs" by then), but this movie stuck with me- it's "Citizen X" I think of when I hear about crimes of this kind. This isn't to say that watching R-rated films scarred me for life, just that "Citizen X" is by far the most believable portrayal of a serial killer I've seen on screen. By the way, I later studied in Russia and visited Rostov-on-the-Don; people have never quite gotten over the things that happened in the surrounding woods.

Posted by: RhymesWithSilver at February 20, 2008 1:41 PM

Josh Hartnett = Lucky Number Slevin

Posted by: Trilbynhiss at February 20, 2008 2:15 PM

Few things are more fun to yell with a Russian-accented thick sticcato then, "Why do you have these abbrasions on the head of your penis?!" Say it twice. Normal volume 1st, then much louder and demanding the 2nd time. My wife & I have been hurling that line randomly back and forth at each other for years based purely on how fun it is to say. No, my wife doesn't have a penis. And no, I don't have any abbrasions. Today.

Posted by: FattyFatFat at February 20, 2008 2:52 PM

Ranylt (or anyone else), if you've seen 'Evilenko,' how does it compare?

Afraid I haven't seen that one. Bueller? --RR

Posted by: em at February 20, 2008 7:06 PM

I was watching Most Evil on Investigastion Discovery (they really should start showing this on Discovery Channel) and on an episode about vampires and cannibals Andre Chikatilo was briefly talked about. He was a #22 on the most evil scale, which puts him among the worst.

Posted by: B at February 24, 2008 1:06 AM