web
counter
 

The Ghost Inside

By Drew Morton | Posted Under Underappreciated Gems | Comments (24)



carnival_of_souls.jpg

Herk Harvey’s $30,000 dollar horror film Carnival of Souls (1962) is a cult-film, a low-budget, black and white shocker that spent years on cable access and in the public domain but still elicits both scares and confused looks. Whenever I mention the film at a cocktail party, I tend to get one of two responses. “Hell yes! I grew up in Lawrence, Kansas (where the flick was lensed). We watched that one all the time!” OR “Never heard of it, sorry!” The film isn’t a particularly well-constructed or well-acted yarn. Harvey and John Clifford, who began their careers making industrial films for Centron Films, didn’t have the time or resources to iron out the kinks. Yet, Carnival of Souls is a in a different league than Plan 9 from Outer Space (1958). Harvey’s film, unlike Ed Wood’s, is actually quite chilling and he is able to squeeze aesthetic blood from his low-budget turnip.

The film focuses on Mary Henry (Candance Hilligoss), a young organist who is involved in a car accident in the opening moments of the flick. Riding with a bunch of friends in a drag race, Mary Henry’s car is nudged off a bridge, into the still river below. When the car is pulled from the river, everybody but Mary Henry has perished. Mary, shaken by her near-death experience, attempts to move on with her life by accepting a job as an organist at a church in Salt Lake City. En route to her new home, she drives past a large, abandoned amusement park. The park haunts her and her obsession with it unleashes the presence of a ghost (director Herk Harvey), who spends the rest of the film haunting the young organist.

Soon after raising the specter of the ghost, Mary Henry begins to experience shifts in her reality. She finds her reflection replaced by that of the ghost. Other times, she finds that she is inaudible or invisible to the people around her. Her near-death experience has made it impossible for her to reconnect to the world around her and the dilapidated amusement park feels like her proper home. She returns to the park, after experiencing a trance-like state, in order to face off with her destiny.

Obviously, there isn’t much to the story of Carnival of Souls. The film’s plot is held together by small vignettes that are bridged by the presence of the ghost. Mary Henry seeks answers for her shifting reality, speaking to a doctor and a minister. The film doesn’t have a lot of dialogue, it doesn’t have a lot of action and, to some people, it probably plays as a pretty boring flick (thankfully, it’s shockingly brief at 78 or 83 minutes, depending on which version you watch). Moreover, there are awkward goofs that made it into the film. For instance, in the opening scene, one of the “dead bodies” in Mary Henry’s car is seen moving.

Despite these errors and the picture’s irregular form, the film succeeds in Harvey’s use of mise-en-scène, paired with the film’s cinematography by another member of Centron Films, Maurice Prather. The high-contrast, black and white images of the carnival, featuring Harvey in pancake makeup, are surprisingly effective thanks to the emphasis that the organ score by Gene Moore brings to the images. These images, along with a third-act revelation, make Carnival of Souls a brief, creepy watch on a cold October night.

Drew Morton is a Ph.D. student in Cinema and Media Studies at the University of California-Los Angeles. His criticism and articles have previously appeared in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the UWM Post, Flow, Mediascape, The Playlist, and Senses of Cinema. He is the 2008 and 2010 recipient of the Otis Ferguson Award for Critical Writing in Film Studies.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



E. Pluribus Anus | The Ten Best Lines from NBC's Thursday Night Comedy Block | Not Even the Media Could Completely Spoil the Sincerity of These Events | The Chilean Miner Rescue









Comments

I'm not sure if "Unknown" means the same as "Underappreciated," but whatever.

Creepy old movies are great because there's the added level of these-people-are-actually-dead-now-so-it's-like-their-ghosts-are-performing-for-me. Same for John Candy movies. What? Too soon?

Posted by: Kballs at October 15, 2010 11:15 AM

This is one of my favorite films. I don't care about the mistakes as that third act revelation renders them all moot. In fact, all of the problems--narrative, performance, continuity--make sense in light of that revelation. It's the "of course" moment.

I'm a sucker for an interesting ghost story, and this one's about a musician. That means wonderful scoring and glorious shots of organs. The only thing missing to hit all my buttons is a big song and dance number with a kickline and smart tuxedos, but that would be a bit out of place here.

Posted by: Robert at October 15, 2010 11:18 AM

"Positively no refunds!"

Heh, haven't seen that one for awhile.

Posted by: , at October 15, 2010 11:19 AM

LOVE this movie. Have it on Criterion. Perfect for Halloween.

Posted by: A. at October 15, 2010 12:04 PM

The voice over in the trailer ... Anyone know the man's name?
Anyone have information about how many 'old flick trailers' he did? :)

Posted by: Ms MoMo at October 15, 2010 12:13 PM

" The only thing missing to hit all my buttons is a big song and dance number with a kickline and smart tuxedos, but that would be a bit out of place here."

Posted by: Robert at October 15, 2010 11:18 AM

Cue the Bollywood remake.

Posted by: BWeaves at October 15, 2010 3:37 PM

The announcer on the trailer doesn't exactly do the film any favors. It sounds like he can't tell if he trying to sell us toothpaste or a horror flick.

Posted by: RhymesWithSilver at October 15, 2010 3:46 PM

My favorite part of "Carnival of Souls" is when she sees the doctor and pours out all of her fears and worries, he counsels her for a while, and then at the end of the conversation nonchalantly mentions that he's not actually a shrink. My best friend and I, since first viewing this 20 years ago, still joke around about that scene! But it is actually quite a creepy little film.

Posted by: Kate at October 15, 2010 5:56 PM

I saw this years ago at Tampa Theater after a an article or review in the New Yorker. As I told my sister later, this movie can be summed up thusly:
"The dead just wanna dance."

Posted by: annecruz at October 15, 2010 6:03 PM

I'm going to go off on a mini-rant here that started when reading the line "(where the flick was lensed)". Is lensed really a go-to term, to me it smacks of when TV shows have characters use jargon, where it was obvious the writers found it through research, and are like "yeaaa this is great, it really grounds the viewer in our world." I am not knowledge enough to know if "lensing" is a preferred term over "shot" in the industry; it just sparked the other thoughts.

Posted by: anon at October 16, 2010 12:42 AM

anon, lensed is a perfectly acceptable term. It might not be the most commonly used, but it's certainly not unheard of. And yes, it is jargon used on film shoots (and often in serious film criticism).

Posted by: Robert at October 16, 2010 9:07 AM

...and film snobs.

Love this movie though!

Posted by: Ben Ruthlessburger at October 16, 2010 11:07 PM

!!! Never heard of it before today..! Sounds awesome!

Posted by: Sarah Barkai at October 17, 2010 2:35 AM

Ben Ruhlessburger (great name)is right 'lensed' is a film snob term, as is 'helmed' or 'helmer', used instead of 'directed' or 'director', this megawank term is used waaay to often in Empire movie magazine by smug writers who think they are somehow vicariously part of the creative process by using such terms.

Posted by: anthony at October 17, 2010 7:23 AM

FYI, this is available on Netflix instant. I caught it a few months ago, I think based on a Pajiban recommendation.

Posted by: that damn monkey at October 17, 2010 2:26 PM

(where the flick was lensed).
Kill yourself you fucking flim school douchebag.
Thanks for your time

Posted by: Jack Random at October 18, 2010 8:34 PM

I watched this when I was 10 with my dad. He really liked buying weird random shit at West Coast Video (you guys remember that?) and watching it with me. Also how I saw "The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari". I remember bits of pieces of this movie and thinking it looked cool even when I was that young. Don't remember much about the plot.

Posted by: ninetwenteetoo at October 19, 2010 4:21 PM

Just thought I would mention most of the film was shot in Salt Lake City, Utah and at the now burned down Saltair resort on the shores of the Great Salt Lake. Only the first few minutes were filmed in Kansas.

Posted by: Karen at October 28, 2010 4:54 PM

Uhm... that was quite interesting :)

Posted by: lavoro da casa at November 18, 2010 1:48 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: Allison at November 26, 2010 6:23 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: lavoro da casa at November 28, 2010 9:11 AM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: Jonathon Pouch at January 5, 2011 2:32 PM

We really appreciate your site post. You can find a multitude of tactics we could put it to really good use by means of a minimum of effort with time and money. Thank you so much for helping make this post give light to many problems we have encountered before now.

Posted by: fare soldi at March 2, 2011 8:17 AM

I couldn't currently have asked for a much better blog. You're always at hand to supply excellent information, going directly to the point for easy understanding of your website visitors. You're surely a terrific pro in this area. Thank you for being there for folks like me.

Posted by: zero friction marketing at March 17, 2011 3:30 AM