web
counter
 

What Hath Millennials Wrought: “Melissa & Joey” Returns

By Sarah Carlson | Posted Under TV Reviews | Comments (13)



melissa-and-joey.jpg

The simple trick of Woody Allen’s latest and beautiful film, Midnight in Paris, is having his viewers fall for the precise nostalgia trap he’s warning us about — that longing to go back to another era we feel must have been better than our present one, even if the residents of back then also are looking at the past. It crosses generations, Allen points out, an interesting “grass is always greener” approach to time no matter when that time was. A modern-day American writer, Gil (Owen Wilson), longs to live in Jazz-age 1920s Paris, while a woman he meets during his mysterious visits to that era thinks Paris was at its best during La Belle Époque, namely the 1870s-’80s. Gil gets to learn his lessons about looking back the magical way, what with middle-of-the-night adventures with a young Ernest Hemingway, Salvador Dali, Cole Porter and F. Scott and Zelda Fitzgerald. But it’s that magic that viewers love and is what had my friends and I immediately calling for trips to Paris, preferably if time travel is involved. We can’t help it — nostalgia is addictive, and it’s hard to remember only to take it in doses.

Us Millennials are having our own problems with nostalgia as we grow closer to or have just passed 30 and have the (debatable) fortune of writing for entertainment publications that target readers akin to ourselves. Our romanticized past is much lower-brow than Allen’s, however. Give us the 1980s and ’90s of America, please, preferably if shopping malls, multi-camera family sitcoms and original “Behind the Music” episodes are involved. Our favorite age is gilded in neon, adorned with scrunchies and set to tunes by Snap! It’s not because our childhood eras were that much greater or more creative; we simply lived through them with innocent eyes and a freedom from the responsibilities that keep cramping our 21st-century style. “All That” was all that because we weren’t old enough to drink.

The ABC Family show “Melissa & Joey,” starring ’90s TV darlings Melissa Joan Hart (“Clarissa Explains It All,” “Sabrina the Teenage Witch”) and Joey Lawrence (“Blossom,” “Brotherly Love”), seems designed with my generation in mind. Hart plays zany councilwoman Melissa in Toledo, Ohio, who is raising her niece, Lennox (Taylor Spreitler), and nephew, Ryder (Nick Robinson), with the help of their nanny, Joey (Lawrence). It’s sweet, simple and a classic set-up, a family comedy where the action stays mainly in a home’s living room and kitchen. A voiceover at each beginning assures us the show was filmed in front of a live studio audience. “Melissa & Joey,” which returned from a long hiatus Wednesday night, does have an appealing quality to it, a departure from the more ironic single-camera comedies that have populated the airwaves since the 2000s. Lawrence proves he has surprising comedic timing, as does the young Robinson. Hart at times seems to be on fast-forward, her expressions and mannerisms almost spastic, but her pairing with Lawrence reminds viewers why they were once teen idols.

Their new vehicle resembles shows such as “Family Matters,” “Full House” and “Step By Step,” down to the silly plots and easy laughs, which do come occasionally. Those shows weren’t great or even all that good, but it can be argued we didn’t know better at the time. We should know better now, but the ratings for “Melissa & Joey” prove otherwise. When the series debuted last August, it drew record ratings for the network with 1.26 million viewers in Adults 18-49 and 2.15 million total viewers. Overall, it ranked among cable’s Top 5 scripted cable series in Adults 18-34, Women 18-34, Viewers 12-34 and Females 12-34, according to Nielsen Media Research. Yes, it is adults who are keeping it alive, those of us looking for a somehow comforting format and faces to help us feel young again.

At least “Melissa & Joey” is a new, even if familiar, creation. Sure, I’ll tune in to some of the ’90s Nickelodeon shows that TeenNick is reairing this fall. But how much nostalgia is too much? When do we get to the point where we are, as my brother eloquently put it on Twitter this week, “eating ourselves alive, starting with memories”? His several-tweet tirade was ignited by The A.V. Club’s baffling “classic” TV recaps, a rehashing of shows such as “Alias,” “Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” “Angel,” “NewsRadio,” older episodes of “The Simpsons,” “Homicide: Life on the Street” and “Batman: The Animated Series.” More recent fare also is dissected, from “Arrested Development” to “The West Wing” to “Veronica Mars,” but it’s no surprise the majority of pieces are dedicated to the shows upon which Millennials were weened. And now, here come recaps of “The Real World,” Season One. Things are getting out of hand.

I’m guilty of watching “Melissa & Joey” — and perhaps mimicking its theme song along with my roommate, complete with choreography, although you can’t prove it — out of boredom and curiosity, but I can’t deny I’m also entertained by the sitcom. It shows that a new take on old formats can work, which was part of Hart and Lawrence’s plan all along. It can be my guilty pleasure. I also realize I need to be careful; I can’t let this ABC Family series be a gateway drug to rehashing the intricacies of shows such as “Hey Dude” and “Salute Your Shorts,” episode for episode. Looking back on remnants of our childhood, or even eras we wished we had lived in, is fine. VHI reviving “Pop Up Video” is frankly awesome. But we can’t actually go back, as tempting as it is. We have to grow up.

So we beat on, one blog post at a time, hoping the rest of our generation won’t stay in the past.

Sarah Carlson has a front-row seat to the decline of the newspaper industry and lives in Alabama with her overly excitable Pembroke Welsh Corgi.










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



How Dare England's Real Royal Couple Get Married In A Private, Discreet Ceremony? Will No One Think Of The Hats??! | Defanged and Pie-Faced: David Cronenberg Knows Just What to Do with RPatz









Comments

I like the TV recaps. When there is nothing on in the summer it's fun to pop in Veronica Mars Season 1 and see what other people have to say about it. Alan Spinwall is reviewing Deadwood right now and by reading the reviews I'm learning a lot about the show that I would have normally missed.

Posted by: Ashley at June 30, 2011 2:08 PM

Thought everyone realized the only reason ABC Family existed was for Whose Line Is It Anyway reruns they occasionally show at midnight. The rest of the channel is just dead air really.

Posted by: googergieger at June 30, 2011 2:29 PM

You write about how Melissa and Joey's the methadone to millenial nostalgia, and you don't even mention how they're doing impersonations of Tony Danza and Judith Light?
I think I'd like to speak to your boss... Who is it?

Posted by: Leroy Grey at June 30, 2011 2:31 PM

I understood the swing revival because it was nostalgia 1) for a long-gone era and 2) it was something cool. I don't understand nostalgia for complete garbage. Family Matters wasn't funny; it was a live action "Family Circus." New Kids on the Block was shit 20 years ago and they're shit today. This would be like our parents pining away for Willie Taylor and Lester or Disco Duck. If you're going to be nostalgic for something that happened within your own lifetime, at least be nostalgic for good stuff.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at June 30, 2011 2:46 PM

In that case, let's just forget about the eighties entirely.

Posted by: googergieger at June 30, 2011 2:49 PM

"Eating ourselves alive."

Or as I have called it: the cannibalization of pop culture.

There's nothing wrong with a well-crafted allusion or the occasional bath of nostalgia, but it does seem to me that our films and television lean more heavily upon the brute force reference these days and expect to earn points merely for wedging a familiar character or quote into a spot where it is being artlessly jammed. I'm guilty of perpetuating the trend myself with some of my viewing and t-shirt selections. Perhaps if I traveled back to 1920s Jazz-age Paris, I'd find malcontents there griping about how shamelessly derivative art had become. Still, the current trend seems like an egregious blight to me, and it leaves me wondering if the storytelling of twenty years from now is going to consist of far too many references to references that the creators do not even realize were direct references in the first place.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at June 30, 2011 2:53 PM

Shut your mouth, Tracer. Disco Duck is KING!

Posted by: JenVegas at June 30, 2011 2:56 PM

Joey Lawrence was on a local morning radio show last week, and the DJ thought it would be funny to have everyone in the studio speak to Joey only in "Whoas" (a la Blossom) until he hung up. It was a sort of dickish way of telling him he's no longer culturally relevant. I tend to agree with them, considering Joey insists on pumping out the same ol' shitty sitcoms he was doing 15 years ago.
Really, who expects the crap they liked at age 8 to hold up 20 years later? OH, because 8 year olds are renowned for their discerning and sophisticated taste in comedy, music, film, etc., right?
The one exception being "Boy Meets World", of course. OF COURSE.

Posted by: Jessie at June 30, 2011 3:02 PM

The one exception is The Adventures of Pete & Pete, if there can only be one, Jessie.

I like the TV Club Classics, not because I'm nostalgic for the 90s, but because I like reading reviews for things that are good and dense enough to be reviewed. The Sepinwall-style of TV criticism didn't exist when Buffy and Alias and the others originally aired, so it's interesting, and then the commenters often have as much or more insight as the critics. I agree, it would be nice if they did classic shows from older eras, but they probably wouldn't get nearly as many page views.

That said, those new Pete & Pete recaps really are just nostalgia dumps with very little actual criticism involved.

Posted by: RobP at June 30, 2011 3:40 PM

True that, RobP. I hadn't considered Pete & Pete. Although that may be because I didn't have cable in my household until I was in high school, so my love for the Petes is borne of watching reruns, sans nostalgia. That show is the shizzle no matter how old you are.

Posted by: Jessie at June 30, 2011 4:28 PM

I was not impressed with this show. I wanted to like it, because I grew up watching Hart and Lawrence. I genuinely thought it was cool to see them together in a show. Ted McGinley's even in there! But it was very formulaic and unconvincingly acted, IMO. There was just no spark or "oomph" to the show. It was flat. Everyone was just going through the motions. It probably didn't help that the episode I saw was a Very Special Episode where Lennox sees the mayor's son drinking alcohol but then he tells his dad that she was the one drinking. That sort of thing certainly is a throwback to the old sitcoms of the 80's and early 90's, but were the ones back then so darn boring? (The answer is most likely yes, at least for some of them. If I watched "Full House" or "Family Matters" now I'd probably be bored out of my skull.)

Posted by: Corntree at July 1, 2011 2:19 AM

Oh! One thing I forgot to mention is that, at least in the episode I watched, Melissa Joan Hart actually had some meat on her bones, and I was pleased to see a show with a woman who wasn't a stick.

Posted by: Corntree at July 1, 2011 2:26 AM

"Thought everyone realized the only reason ABC Family existed was for Whose Line Is It Anyway reruns they occasionally show at midnight. The rest of the channel is just dead air really."

Lies! The only reason ABC Family exists, in the platonic sense, is for Middleman.

What's that you say? You didn't watch Middleman? It's your fault it was cancelled? Get Out! Leave!

Posted by: Ender at July 1, 2011 5:27 AM